Welcome to another episode of The Cents of Things with Ron and Jeff! In this episode, we dive into the world of finance, discussing the latest economic trends, the market mania surrounding NVIDIA, and some interesting historical facts. We cover everything from the valuation of tech giants to the divergence in economic indicators.
Join us as we analyze the Chicago business barometer, ISM manufacturing data, job openings, and labor turnover statistics. We will also touch on the recent surprises in government job hiring and ADP unemployment numbers.
Tune in for insightful discussions, market insights, and a few laughs. Don't forget to subscribe to our channel and leave us an upvote if you enjoy the content. Your support means the world to us! Stay informed and entertained with The Cents of Things. See you in the next episode!
You can also catch the show on our YouTube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/@TheCentsOfThings
To Follow Jeff Kikel
To Follow Ron Lang
Welcome to the Cents of things podcast, where your money talks
2
:and we listen, join host Jeff Kickel
and Ron Lang as they explore the
3
:economy, financial planning, and the
stock market, adding a splash of fun to
4
:make your financial journey engaging.
5
:Each episode, they break down
complex topics to give you the clear
6
:edge in your financial decisions.
7
:Stay tuned and let's make
Cents of things together.
8
:Good morning to the Cents of things.
9
:It's Ron and Jeff here once again, and we
are kicking off another couple of episodes
10
:of the Cents of things, talking a little
bit about what's going on in the world,
11
:what's going on in the economy, and maybe
a few funny things to get us kicked off.
12
:Ron, how you doing, brother?
13
:Ron Lang: Good morning.
14
:So basically we're just going to spend
the next two hours talking about NVIDIA.
15
:Is that right?
16
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah.
17
:And it's comparisons to
other things in history.
18
:Ron Lang: Yeah.
19
:All right.
20
:We'll have to set up a separate episode
for that, but I think the mania is
21
:getting a little out of control.
22
:Jeff Kikel: I'm with you.
23
:I'm with you.
24
:I just, once again I look at it
and, now we're down to basically
25
:the, we were the magnificent seven.
26
:Now we're down to the
magnificent three at this point.
27
:And you've got, you've now got
Nvidia Apple and Microsoft in the 3
28
:trillion range, which is just insane.
29
:Ron Lang: And yeah, that's another episode
we should do compare one of those stocks.
30
:Compared to the European market,
the Asian market, one, one company's
31
:market cap is larger than all of that.
32
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah.
33
:Yeah.
34
:And they were saying, and I think
I forget what the number was.
35
:It's 35 billion.
36
:NVIDIA is, close to eclipsing
Microsoft within 35 billion.
37
:And here's the crazy thing.
38
:I
39
:Ron Lang: hear some people coming out and
they're like, Oh, you could justify that.
40
:And then everybody's got their own
FACAC then I'm telling you, I got, I'm
41
:literally, I got PTSD of 97, eight, nine.
42
:Listening to people talking about
valuation of nvidia and not that
43
:it's a bad company and it's not
like it's not making money, right?
44
:microsoft and intel we're making
money in the mid to late 90s, but The
45
:pe and the valuations were absurd.
46
:I don't know where nvidia's pe is now I
know it was like 60 or 70 and then I hear
47
:people that are valuation people talking
about Yeah, you could make a case for it.
48
:I just know that two things one They
don't want to say it's too high or the
49
:valuation's out of control because if
it doubles from here, they look like
50
:a schmuck Yeah, and or they're in bed
with fund companies or other people
51
:that Have a big share of nvidia stock
and they would basically be like, what
52
:are you killing the golden goose for?
53
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah, the golden goose.
54
:That's
55
:Ron Lang: why I don't trust some
of these analysts coming out.
56
:Jeff Kikel: I don't trust
most of them, quite frankly.
57
:I think they're, it's a cartel and
they just all kind of work together
58
:in collusion a lot of times.
59
:Yeah I just I'm sorry.
60
:I don't buy most of the analyst research.
61
:I don't use the analyst
research at all in my practice.
62
:I do my own research because
I just don't trust anybody.
63
:Ron Lang: I actually we talked about it.
64
:I was originally one of the beta testers
of a website that holds the Analysts
65
:feet to the fire and they rate them
based on their price targets within
66
:a Within a calendar period of time,
maybe i'll share it with you Maybe i'll
67
:share with the audience at some point.
68
:I don't want to make it look like i'm
advertising, but I will tell you It's
69
:a damn good Bible for for not only
information, but following analysts
70
:that are truly worth their salt.
71
:Sure.
72
:Yeah.
73
:And there's not a
74
:Jeff Kikel: whole lot of them.
75
:Ron Lang: Yeah no.
76
:So we retired the bad business
decisions for a little bit.
77
:And so for the next, I think four
or five podcasts that I'm going to
78
:focus in on are just some fun facts.
79
:And these are some interesting ones
because I will tell you i'm a history
80
:guy I love nostalgia And every now
and then you come up with something.
81
:I remember that i'm like really so here
is here is something interesting So
82
:everybody who hasn't seen the titanic?
83
:Actually the original necklace that was
on You know in that movie was actually
84
:worth 10 million dollars Obviously
back in the day with the titanic
85
:people, people were like, look at this.
86
:I don't know how much they, I don't
know if they even said how much,
87
:how valuable it was back then.
88
:If you look over the next hundred years,
but I thought this was interesting.
89
:It's 171 carat 171
carat Sapphire necklace.
90
:It was a beautiful necklace and everybody
probably thought it was a stage prop.
91
:Yeah.
92
:I thought it was interesting.
93
:Jeff Kikel: I didn't realize
it was actually real.
94
:That's nuts.
95
:That's my point.
96
:Ron Lang: And at the end of the
movie, she threw it into the ocean.
97
:I know.
98
:I don't think that's a spoiler
alert for anybody that's listening.
99
:That's a good one.
100
:Okay.
101
:That was it.
102
:the Godfather, right?
103
:Yeah.
104
:Or at least the first two movies,
the third was pretty poor.
105
:But then it was eventually changed.
106
:But if you think about it, the book was
called The Godfather, so why would they
107
:have called the movie The Godfather?
108
:Yeah, why would you have changed it?
109
:But yeah.
110
:Thought that was interesting.
111
:And my last fun fact.
112
:The matrix code, when you see the
movie, and I only saw the first one, I
113
:fell asleep in the second one, but the
matrix code is actually sushi recipes.
114
:Okay.
115
:It's not a code at all.
116
:It's a series of sushi recipes,
cleverly disguised to create the
117
:illusion of a complex code in the
digital world of thought that I'll be
118
:very blunt with you, I like to cook.
119
:I don't follow any recipes.
120
:I got my things that I
like to do when I cook.
121
:And I'm thinking to myself, when you're
making sushi, is there really a recipe?
122
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah.
123
:Is there, theoretically, yeah,
because they're, they have, similar
124
:things that they put into it, but I,
nothing that you really have to follow
125
:Ron Lang: the Sriracha mayo or, whatever.
126
:But my thing is okay,
you take a picture of it.
127
:That's how you make it.
128
:Yeah.
129
:Huh?
130
:What you're not cooking the fish.
131
:You're not sauteing the fish.
132
:You got rice, you got seaweed,
you got fish, and then you
133
:got a couple of other things.
134
:I'm thinking to myself, how
complex are there recipes?
135
:Apparently it's more
complex than you thought.
136
:Obviously, obviously if you watch the
movie, you're not going to be able to
137
:stare at that code long enough to figure
out what the hell those recipes are.
138
:I,
139
:Jeff Kikel: I couldn't get past it.
140
:I started watching it, and I like Keanu
Reeves, and I like, Lawrence Fishburne,
141
:but I just couldn't get past the movie.
142
:Ron Lang: The crazy thing is,
and I did enjoy the first movie,
143
:but like that movie, like many
other similar type of movies.
144
:At some point you just get tired
of a 10 minute drawn out fight.
145
:What else is exciting with
him running through the air,
146
:20 feet kicking and punching?
147
:How many times can you watch that
in a two and a half hour movie?
148
:Anyway, I got a little tired of that.
149
:Okay.
150
:On to some serious stuff.
151
:So I thought this was interesting
every now and then I'm able to get
152
:some interesting charts that, and
I know we've been talking about
153
:this for a while, but this is the
the Chicago business barometer.
154
:It's also part, you don't include some
of their PMI information, but I thought
155
:this was interesting because this isn't
going back the last 10, 20 or 30 years.
156
:This is going back over 55 years,
157
:Jeff Kikel: 70.
158
:Yeah.
159
:Ron Lang: Looking at all this.
160
:And we talk about this all the time.
161
:We're not making this up, right?
162
:These are actual facts and figures now.
163
:I know we joke around quite a bit
Especially that one time when we chastised
164
:the atlanta fed for coming out with an
outrageous gdp number But everybody else
165
:was half of that amount or a negative
amount and they were almost dead on
166
:Yeah, Look again, I don't know how they
even come up with that, but these are
167
:actual numbers with their charts And
I don't know what is this telling us?
168
:We know we all know that the computer
is strong a computer the consumer is
169
:strong Spending money they got jobs.
170
:It's flowing into their 401ks They're out
spending money whether it's money they
171
:have or they don't and it's on credit.
172
:But
173
:Jeff Kikel: yeah
174
:Ron Lang: All the other economic
numbers have been trending down.
175
:And this chart is telling you a lot.
176
:Other than in 1990, everything came
down to this 35 ish level telling
177
:you that a recession was pending.
178
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah.
179
:Ron Lang: Thoughts.
180
:Jeff Kikel: I, once again I think our
next episode, I'm going to have some stuff
181
:on this, but I totally agree with you.
182
:I think it is.
183
:To me is starting to show and it's in
the cracks are widening in a lot of
184
:different areas, And we've been saying
this for a year now and I think a lot
185
:of people have been saying it for a year
that when do we start to see a recession?
186
:And, you and I both have the same feeling
about this whole soft landing, hard
187
:landing recession, whatever it is it's
going to happen, it's going to happen
188
:and it's starting to show signs across
multiple different areas, not just.
189
:Okay inflation's higher.
190
:Okay, this is high.
191
:It's just starting to show
in a lot of different areas.
192
:And I, once again, I think
it's you've got to be sure that
193
:you protect in those cases.
194
:Unfortunately, you also have to
you can't just sit back and go I'm
195
:just going to I think it's coming.
196
:I'm just going to stop.
197
:Stop investing because it'll
just beat you down and the market
198
:will keep running at this point.
199
:And, I think what you're seeing in the
market is when it was looking like.
200
:Okay, we're not really, we're not slowing
the market started to get a little bit
201
:soft because, okay, it doesn't look like
the feds going to lower rates and now all
202
:of a sudden, we've seen some soft numbers
and now the market's rocketing up because
203
:obviously the feds going to reduce rates.
204
:If you look at history,
that is probably not true.
205
:They're going to wait and then
it's going to go there for longer.
206
:Yeah, higher for longer.
207
:They keep saying it.
208
:They're going to keep
it higher for longer.
209
:That just means that they're probably
going to do what they've always done in
210
:history, which is to massively overshoot
the wrong way, because they waited for way
211
:too long to let inflation get out of hand.
212
:And they're probably going to wait
too long and it's going to cause
213
:the the market to go the other way.
214
:Ron Lang: Always behind the curve, but I
think it was Warren Buffett's, infamous
215
:quote, the market could stay irrational
longer than you can stay solvent.
216
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah.
217
:Then
218
:Ron Lang: you
219
:Jeff Kikel: have
220
:Ron Lang: money.
221
:Yes, absolutely.
222
:Jeff Kikel: Totally agree
223
:Ron Lang: with
224
:Jeff Kikel: him on that
225
:Ron Lang: too.
226
:Absolutely.
227
:All right.
228
:My next chart is taking their
the Chicago business barometer
229
:and their ISM manufacturing.
230
:And for the most part, it's almost
stayed lockstep and converged.
231
:And look what happened starting
st,:
232
:It diverged.
233
:Yeah.
234
:What is this telling us now?
235
:It's not necessarily the divergence.
236
:It's the depth of the
divergence to the downside.
237
:Now, again, and I don't know if
you know the answer to this or not.
238
:I do not because there, I know that
different feds have different ISM numbers.
239
:I actually never paid attention
to the quote unquote Chicago I
240
:accept the Chicago PMI numbers.
241
:No, we've been talking
242
:Jeff Kikel: about
243
:Ron Lang: Philly
244
:Jeff Kikel: fed,
245
:New York fed, Richmond,
all that I've really had
246
:Ron Lang: the New York ISM
index, manufacturing or PMI.
247
:So I thought this was interesting.
248
:And I'd like to maybe overlay this at
some time, if we could ever get a chart
249
:of all the different feds and their ISM
to see if they're actually following
250
:Jeff Kikel: along together or 100%.
251
:Is it something unique to that region
around Chicago that's having issues?
252
:But honestly, I don't think so.
253
:And most of the ones we follow have
the negative, so I would say they're
254
:probably along the same lines.
255
:It's interesting to watch how it
shot up there for the end of:
256
:And then 2024, it's just
Freaking going straight down.
257
:Ron Lang: For the most part, and look,
this has been for in history 50, 5 0.
258
:0 has always been like the demarcation
line of expansion or contraction.
259
:And the interesting thing is,
it's ISM number since late:
260
:Has been contracting.
261
:The PMI had a spike in
late 23, but holy crap.
262
:This is, if you just take a look
at, at the historical numbers
263
:in the last 25 years, this is.
264
:Parabolic move to the upside.
265
:This is just falling down an
elevator shaft to the downside.
266
:Sure Yeah,
267
:Jeff Kikel: Like I said the weird
divergence though between pmi And
268
:ism where ism's been creeping its way
back up, you know I mean in the end
269
:it's the pmi that's going to drive
stuff because they're the people that
270
:buy things From the manufacturer.
271
:Ron Lang: And my last one was the
the job openings and labor turnover
272
:summary, this kind of came right
from their press release on June 4th.
273
:And I'm not going to read all this,
you and I have talked about this just
274
:tad dozy and probably got revisions.
275
:So I highlighted the mar this is the
april and why it's a month behind.
276
:I don't know because it came out
in june for april don't understand
277
:that but the march revisions were
revised down to 133 thousand I just
278
:find that this is just crazy Because
down here what's also not calculated.
279
:I didn't highlight it is the
number of quote unquote quits
280
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah,
281
:Ron Lang: so there's a difference and I
don't know how they're able to decipher
282
:and differentiate The people that
are let go the people that are hired
283
:Versus the people that just i'm done.
284
:I'm quitting.
285
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah,
286
:Ron Lang: I don't know and here's
the other one the total separations
287
:This is my other point the total
separations were revised by 130 000.
288
:So what the hell is
the difference between?
289
:quits Separations fire.
290
:I don't know.
291
:All I know is it keeps
getting revised the wrong way.
292
:Whether it's the quits and the revisions
are quits and the separations to
293
:the upside and then the other stuff
294
:Jeff Kikel: goes down.
295
:And yeah, and I, in our next show, I've
actually got a chart on this that I'll
296
:go over to look at the consistency of it.
297
:And the jolts number hit
a high point up around 11.
298
:11, 000, 000 12, 000, 000 right
after the pandemic, and it's been on
299
:a continual downward spike, which,
meant, okay, part of that was people
300
:getting back into the workforce.
301
:And, of course, reducing
those open positions, but.
302
:I think what's happening now from
my perspective on the jolts number
303
:is, those jobs are starting to get
pulled back, companies are looking at.
304
:Okay.
305
:We don't want to fire people right
now, but we're just going to pull back
306
:the job openings, where there's not
as many job openings at this point.
307
:Ron Lang: Yeah, and actually one quick
thing I wanted to bring up here and I
308
:didn't highlight it I meant to bring it
up was we talked about this a couple of
309
:times that when the employment number
and actually we'll know tomorrow the
310
:unemployment for may and You know the
interesting thing we always talk about
311
:if you look into the details of the
numbers not just the headline But the
312
:details that half to two thirds of the
new hires were government jobs Yeah, I
313
:thought this was interesting in april
Federal government jobs went down.
314
:8000.
315
:Jeff Kikel: Yeah.
316
:Yeah.
317
:It was interesting.
318
:It was medical, medical and governmental
jobs, which I mean, I would argue
319
:the point that a lot of those I would
still categorize a lot of those medical
320
:jobs as, Government jobs in some way,
shape, or form, at that point, but
321
:yeah, those, it was really dramatic.
322
:And I think we, we covered that in a
couple episodes ago when that number
323
:came out of, this was just like a
really weird aberration where, we had
324
:seen this huge growth in government
and all of a sudden there was a
325
:massive pullback in government hiring.
326
:Ron Lang: The whole point is they
keep hiring, but here they let go.
327
:So are these people that retired are
these people that decided to go into the
328
:private sector again We don't know the
reasons behind all this and unfortunately
329
:You know financial media economists.
330
:I mean Are looking at the headline
number because that's the number
331
:they're plugging into their models.
332
:Yeah Again, I don't know what they're
doing with all these other details
333
:as far as How the sausage is made.
334
:But
335
:Jeff Kikel: and if we look at, although
it's sometimes not the best indicator of
336
:it, if you look at ADP unemployment this
week, it was a pretty big of a shock.
337
:I know I'm just looking at briefing.
338
:com.
339
:The forecast was 165, 000 jobs and
it came in at one 52 on the ADP.
340
:So it's interesting, but I just, what
I've seen from the federal numbers is
341
:it's they're budgie at the, when they
come out as a headline and then they
342
:revise them back, you, you've got to
really pay attention to what they're
343
:doing, back three, four months, because
they're constantly revising them.
344
:And those things have been going down
pretty dramatically on the revision.
345
:Don't know.
346
:I just, if you look at the jolts number,
you look at that and we'll, like I
347
:said, in the next episode, we'll cover
this a little bit more in detail.
348
:I just see that slowing and that's
just, that's the last kind of do
349
:that I see to fall potentially.
350
:So make sure you stay
tuned for the next episode.
351
:Where we actually get into
this a little bit more.
352
:Ron Lang: Never a dull moment and
there's always something to chat about.
353
:So absolutely.
354
:The good thing is
355
:Jeff Kikel: there's always news and
plenty of stuff for us to talk about.
356
:Folks, thank you for joining us.
357
:Once again, we do these shows for you.
358
:Make sure that you take the
time to subscribe to the channel
359
:and make sure that you take the
time to give us a little upvote.
360
:Let us know that you're around.
361
:We've gotten a lot of those
lately and it's been nice to know
362
:that you're out there and that
you're liking what we're doing.
363
:So thanks a lot and we'll see
you back here the very next time.