Congress has actually done something noteworthy by passing the Sunshine Act, which aims to make Daylight Saving Time permanent if the Senate agrees. It’s about time we tackle this twice-a-year clock adjustment that most folks find annoying. I mean, we lose an hour in March and then get it back in November, and honestly, who really enjoys that hassle? If Congress is serious about this, they need to pick a time and stick with it. I want to hear your thoughts on whether we should keep switching or just stop the madness altogether. Let’s dive into this and see what you think over at jamesabrown.net.

Takeaways:

• Congress has actually made a move by passing the Sunshine Act, making Daylight Saving Time permanent.
• Adjusting clocks twice a year has always felt like a burdensome ritual to many people.
• Most folks complain about the clock changes, yet nobody seems to want to end this practice.
• We lose an hour in March and gain it back in November; it's an endless cycle we deal with.
• If Congress is serious about this, they should just pick a time and stick with it.
• No matter the outcome, we all know we'll eventually adapt to whatever time we end up with.

This is the Daily note from jamesabrown.net as hard as it is to believe, Congress actually did something.

A shocker.

I know the House passed the Sunshine act, which would make Daylight Saving Time permanent if the Senate goes along with it.

Now, I've always found adjusting clocks twice a year ponderous.

It's one of those annoying rituals that that almost everyone complains about and no one seems capable of ending.

We lose an hour in March, we get it back in November.

So yes, Congress, if you really care about this, pick a time and stick with it.

Whatever happens here, we'll get used to it.

What do you think about all this?

Should we switch or stop switching?

Let me know on jamesabrown.net on that note, I'm James A.

Brown, and as always, be well.