Artwork for podcast Blueprints of Disruption
Rabble Rants: Dismantled and Dispersed; Prisoner Exchanges but no Peace
Episode 8626th November 2023 • Blueprints of Disruption • Rabble Rousers' Cooperative
00:00:00 01:06:11

Share Episode

Shownotes

Topic 1: Dismantled and Dispersed

The City of Toronto, aided by Police, evicted an encampment community in the Kensington Market area of the city from a tiny parkette outside a church that welcomed them. The excuses used by the City and local Councilor Diane Saxe don't fly with our hosts or housing advocates.

Topic 2: Prisoner Exchanges but no Peace

We give updates on the release of hostages and prisoners, and a short term truce that is anything but. Those updates, plus a look at just how many children are imprisoned by Israel, what their conditions are and what generally puts them there.

All of our content is free - made possible by the generous sponsorships of our Patrons. If you would like to support us: Patreon

Follow us on Instagram

Resources:

Transcripts

Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. All right, we got a lot to talk about on today's episode. Later on,

Speaker:

we're going to be talking about the prisoner swap in Israel-Palestine and everything surrounding

Speaker:

that. But before we get to that, we're going to talk about something a little bit closer

Speaker:

to home. And for me in particular, this was right in my backyard essentially. Many of you

Speaker:

probably already have heard what has been happening, but as the cold weather starts to really come

Speaker:

in and we're trying to get the first few snowfalls of the season, the city of Toronto decided

Speaker:

that it was the perfect time to violently displace and evict another encampment. This time it

Speaker:

was the encampment outside of the St. Stephen in the Fields Church in Kensington Market,

Speaker:

on the north end of Kensington Market. And everything surrounding it, everything surrounding this

Speaker:

has been deeply, deeply disturbing. Very like, I mean... Just right off the bat, I'll say

Speaker:

that I didn't believe that when Olivia Chow first won the election a few months ago, I

Speaker:

thought that the days of these kind of evictions were behind us, but all that I saw was somebody

Speaker:

being a hell of a lot more sneaky about it and a lot more concerned about PR. But in terms

Speaker:

of the end result, nothing at all was different. and we're gonna unpack that. There's a lot

Speaker:

to unpack here. And you're kind of easy on Olivia Chow there. I feel like this is part of her

Speaker:

housing policy. It's, but I think a harder target needs to be placed on the city councilor from

Speaker:

this ward, Diane Sachs. She's been abhorrent towards poor folks just in her rhetoric and

Speaker:

policies. Yeah, yeah, like she's a known worst offender and. The evictions that have happened

Speaker:

under Chow have mostly, for my understanding, happened in this ward. Yes. So it seems as

Speaker:

though this councillor is actively pushing for evictions, and this area in particular, there's

Speaker:

two kind of reasons the city was looking to remove these folks outwardly. Two front-facing

Speaker:

reasons. One was to build a pollinator garden. something you can't do in this weather. And

Speaker:

the other was framing it as a fire hazard. Right, so that's what the city will tell you. The

Speaker:

reason is that they removed, what about 22 people that had been living in tents next to a church

Speaker:

who welcomed them fully and had been living there for about a year and a half. Right? More,

Speaker:

more. I spoke to a resident who said he'd been there for two years. And yeah, Diane Sachs

Speaker:

is the definition of a green capitalist. She is everything that's wrong with the Green Party.

Speaker:

As she was the deputy leader of the Ontario Green Party before being elected by less than

Speaker:

a hundred points, less than a hundred votes over Norm B. Pasquale, who's currently leading

Speaker:

the fight against Ontario Place. Shout out to Norm for that, because I support the heck out

Speaker:

of what he's doing right now. But yeah, no. They've been after this encampment for a while.

Speaker:

Earlier in the summer there was an attempt, and they did displace a lot of them, to cut

Speaker:

down a tree branch. And then what ended up happening was a lot of those residents got displaced

Speaker:

to Bellevue Park, which is more central in Kensington, and Sonia's Parkette, which is a bit more hidden

Speaker:

in Kensington. And then the city went and evicted the residents of Sonia Parkette. they were

Speaker:

threatening to evict the Bellevue Park. I don't think they actually went through with it. That

Speaker:

one would have been really difficult for them to do just because of the community there.

Speaker:

So this story, firstly, and there was, you know, you mentioned the pollinator garden. Before

Speaker:

the pollinator garden, there was something even more despicable where Diane Sacks proposed

Speaker:

building a memorial for dead homeless. Was that this park or is that a Bellevue? No, no, that

Speaker:

was at the church at St. Stephen and the Fields Church. She proposed... This woman has some

Speaker:

hard on for this area, this particular parkette. They are willing to throw anything and everything.

Speaker:

That's unreal to remove 22 people who this is all they have in a system where we know there

Speaker:

aren't enough shelter beds. Like, that is a vendetta. This woman is on some mission. That's

Speaker:

unreal. Yeah, no, I mean... Rightfully the condonation. What a villain. I'm sorry. Yeah, like it's

Speaker:

the idea of displacing people to build a memorial to dead homeless people. It's. And like hunting

Speaker:

them down. And hunting them. Right? Yeah. Like as they find another space to create for themselves,

Speaker:

to save for themselves. Nope, nope, nope. And we're gonna trash your stuff while we're at

Speaker:

it. It needs to be understood just like right off the bat. You like, cause they. You know,

Speaker:

they say, oh, we have some shelter space for them. Okay, we know shelters in the summer

Speaker:

have been turning away over 300 people a day. Right? So what happens if you get rid of people

Speaker:

in the shelters to make room to clear the encampment? Well, then that's an equal amount of people

Speaker:

that you have now kicked back onto the street, where and they're gonna have to find set up

Speaker:

an encampment somewhere else, right? So what this is what somebody I spoke to another community

Speaker:

leader from another local church. And the way she described this was as a cruel game of whack-a-mole.

Speaker:

And yeah, that was incredibly fucking accurate because that's exactly what the city does.

Speaker:

It chases people from park to park to park, regardless of whether or not people actually

Speaker:

want them there, right? And what's particularly fucking... What gets me about St. Stephen in

Speaker:

the fields is that the people do want them there. They want to support them, right? Maggie Helwig,

Speaker:

who is the reverend of the church, has been supporting them publicly for a year and a half.

Speaker:

feeding them. She describes herself not just as, she describes herself as a friend to them,

Speaker:

right? They have a community here. Damn straight, you live anywhere for two years surrounded

Speaker:

by folks. You have a community. Even anybody who's gone camping for the weekend can understand

Speaker:

the camaraderie or anything where you're trapped in a situation with people for X amount of

Speaker:

time. It becomes community. But this like actually is like we're talking about this is where they

Speaker:

live. And this is Right? Like in Kensington Market, right beside Chinatown. I'll tell you

Speaker:

this, like friends of Kensington Market has been publicly supporting them. The Kensington

Speaker:

Community Land Trust has been publicly supporting them. I know the people of Kensington have

Speaker:

been publicly supporting them. They're not asking for them to be kicked out. They're not. Who

Speaker:

is? And this is important. There's a fucking Montessori school down the street. Let me just

Speaker:

pull up the name because I forget. Westside Montessori School. Now, before I, there was

Speaker:

an organization that was created called Friends of Bellevue Parkette. Now, just to be clear,

Speaker:

there is no such thing as Bellevue Parkette. There's Bellevue Park. Bellevue Parkette is

Speaker:

what is a name that they created to describe the front yard of the church, which is technically

Speaker:

not the church's land. It's city land somehow. I still don't understand how that worked out.

Speaker:

Same at St. James Park, at St. James Cathedral there, whatever. the encampment is, was, right?

Speaker:

Now they're calling it Bellevue Parkette. Now this group, Friends of Bellevue Parkette, was

Speaker:

created by Elizabeth Gurvin, yeah, Gurvin, who is the director of Westside Montessori School

Speaker:

in Kensington Market, which if I'm not mistaken was, like there was a home for women, I think.

Speaker:

or something, there was some sort of public home that was there before that was in shutdown

Speaker:

and then they built this private school, which I can tell you most people cannot, like most

Speaker:

people who live there, like, the people who live in Kensington Market cannot afford that

Speaker:

shit first of all. It's a private school, right? And they've been making, they're the ones who

Speaker:

proposed building a pollinated garden. in front of the church to replace the encampment. And

Speaker:

from what I hear, what people are saying, the word in the street is with connections to Diane

Speaker:

Sacks. And it sounds exactly like what Diane Sacks, it sounds like green colonialism, which

Speaker:

we've been talking about. The level of fucking privilege it must take to look at a space where

Speaker:

the most marginalized people are living. And I'm gonna put some cone flowers there. I'm

Speaker:

all for saving the bees, but there's so much green space in the city. Okay, we're lucky.

Speaker:

I know we're trying to preserve it, but Toronto has a lot of green space, especially when you

Speaker:

visit other urban centers. There's lots of places to build pollinator gardens. There's lots of

Speaker:

people who own homes in the surrounding area that can make pollinator gardens. Yeah.

Speaker:

a space about 20 times the size of the encampment, all of just lawn that can be turned into a

Speaker:

pollinator. The amount of home and honestly, Toronto does a decent job at this of having

Speaker:

front lawns be native biodiversity as opposed to, you know, lawns, which by the way, for

Speaker:

those who don't know, lawns have a really fucked up history, like the idea of just having a

Speaker:

flat green non-native grass lawn has a lot of fucked up history. It essentially comes out

Speaker:

of, it's an English history and it was essentially a status symbol to have a lawn because what

Speaker:

you're saying is I have so much land I do not need to use this to grow food. Instead I can

Speaker:

have this land be nothing. That's how rich I am, right? I just, when trying to unpack their

Speaker:

like how a human being can look at that space and then be like, well, what are we going to

Speaker:

do with them? Like in their thought process, as they create this petition or this organization,

Speaker:

all these moms get together or whatever it is. I'm a mom, I'm allowed to say that. And you

Speaker:

know, does nobody in the group or nobody amongst them look at one another and be like, what

Speaker:

about those human beings? Like they're in the way of our possible garden? like our just our

Speaker:

community initiative that's going to displace 22 people in our community for flowers. What

Speaker:

happens to that human that they can get there? It's it's completely like and this is completely

Speaker:

disconnected from the local community there. Right. And this goes to show like a small group

Speaker:

of nimbus, I'll call them, I guess, right, because that's kind of what a small group, their voice

Speaker:

seems to be holding a lot more weight with people like Diane Sachs and the people in power, than

Speaker:

the massive public support from the rest of Kensington Market. Who gets this struggle?

Speaker:

Kensington Market being a neighborhood that has constantly fought against this, right?

Speaker:

Constantly fights for its people, fights against gentrification, right? The Kensington Market

Speaker:

Community Land Trust, Friends of Kensington, right? Like, this is a radical fucking neighborhood,

Speaker:

I spent a lot of time there. I spent a lot of time in Bellevue Park, you know. Other places

Speaker:

that, you know, you hear, you know, people complaining, but not here. Not here. Here, they're a welcome

Speaker:

part of the community. Right. So. It goes to show like it's. Who has the levers of power,

Speaker:

right? And this is a fucking it's a fucking private school, and it's not. And the pollinator

Speaker:

garden. This was broken. Like this story was broken, I think, in October, late October,

Speaker:

so like about a month ago. And St. Stephen in the Fields filed an injunction to prevent that

Speaker:

from happening, which got rejected a few days ago. And immediately afterwards, the city then

Speaker:

moved to clear the encampment. And the reasoning that they gave for that because... So I found

Speaker:

out through... Cathy Crowe, because another journalist in my program was talking to her

Speaker:

about the armories, and the story behind that was a whole other thing. It wasn't really like

Speaker:

being publicized. And then we sent them, we emailed the city asking for more information,

Speaker:

right? They came back with pages all about like fire hazards and fire risks, right? And this

Speaker:

is a very common narrative, right? That the encampments must be cleared for fire risks.

Speaker:

There's some validity to the fire risk being an issue. Just last night. Just last, yeah,

Speaker:

just the day of, the day of, so not last night, Friday night, Bellevue Park encampment burnt

Speaker:

to the ground. Now, I'm not gonna put on my tinfoil hat here and speculate. Just to be

Speaker:

clear, an encampment at Bellevue Park. So not like the park itself, but a community like

Speaker:

the one we're describing in a different park. Just on the street. Yeah, and like I said,

Speaker:

I'm not going to put on my tinfoil hat and speculate over the coincidence of it being the same night.

Speaker:

Life is funny and who's to know? Like, I have no reason to know. Like, definitely it sounded

Speaker:

strange to me. but. There is, like, especially as the winter gets colder, you know, people

Speaker:

are freezing to death, right? There needs to be heat. Now, there was a perfect response

Speaker:

to this, which Lorraine Lamb of the Shelter and Housing Justice Network and Diane Chan

Speaker:

McNally, who we had on the show not that long ago, or I don't know, time doesn't make sense

Speaker:

to me anymore. They had the perfect response to this. So I just wanted to credit them. In

Speaker:

2018, there was a coroner's inquest that looked into this issue and they recommended that the

Speaker:

city of Toronto distribute fire safe camping equipment to help prevent encampment fires.

Speaker:

So this came from the coroner's inquest, right? This was pretty official. The city has not

Speaker:

done that. They instead are weaponizing fire codes to justify the continued displacement.

Speaker:

Because for everything, everything for them is a cost benefit analysis, right? Replacing

Speaker:

fireproof tents and safer cooking equipment or whatever, you know, they could do. For them

Speaker:

it's absolutely not like there cannot be a visible reminder in the city for them of their failures

Speaker:

of poverty. but also they just see poor people as a blight. And you can tell this by the behaviors

Speaker:

of this counselor. So why would they try to make it more safe for them? Because clearly,

Speaker:

from the removal of benches and union station and all the anti-homelessness initiatives that

Speaker:

aren't at housing people, but just removing them from public space, from the public eye,

Speaker:

from the public mind. Right? Because all of it is a reminder that capitalism is failing

Speaker:

us miserably. And that's why people want to do that disconnect. They don't want to see

Speaker:

those people as members of their community. Right? They're outsiders who came down to the

Speaker:

city and, you know, like they don't genuinely see them as part of their community simply

Speaker:

because they don't have brick and mortar around them to sleep. And that's a huge human disconnect.

Speaker:

And we can see, like, they constantly have some sort of explanation. Right? Like whether or

Speaker:

not it's, oh, public. space it like parks are for the public not for encampments you know

Speaker:

okay well this one was in front of a church not in a park a church that wanted them there

Speaker:

their reasoning is invalid oh fire risk well you're not actually taking any action to mitigate

Speaker:

the fire risk it seems like the city wants there to be a fire risk so they continue to justify

Speaker:

this because they didn't get rid of the fire risk they've moved it right so the city will

Speaker:

tell folks that their housing They found shelter space for them, but we know that there are

Speaker:

no actual enough beds. So they're either displacing other people from shelter beds that, or they

Speaker:

found them where they don't exist, or what's really likely to happen is they will have emergency

Speaker:

accommodations that will last for X amount of time, and then they will simply be back to

Speaker:

their own means, which means another encampment. Let's talk about the shelter space, because

Speaker:

where is the shelter space, right? Now, Let's be clear, the residents of the Bellevue, of

Speaker:

the St. Stephen and the Fields Church encampment, some of them ended up in Rexdale, from what

Speaker:

I'm hearing. What? Yeah. Okay, there's people listening that won't understand the geography

Speaker:

there. Yeah. And we'll unpack in a second, but I spoke, another one, they were saying, they

Speaker:

were telling him that they were going to send him to Scarborough. Right. So these are the

Speaker:

far west and east ends of the city. And nowhere near. The park we're talking about is in the

Speaker:

core in the south end of the city. Now, right in front of St. Stephen in the fields, there's

Speaker:

the Fort York food bank. I think it's a Fort York food bank. There is a food bank, right?

Speaker:

They also get food from the church. They have their community there. I spoke to a resident

Speaker:

Alex Garcia aka the pirate. He's someone I've seen around in Kensington market a lot. And

Speaker:

he's been living at St. Stephen in the fields for two years. And he was, they were threatened

Speaker:

to send him to Scarborough, right? And he was saying about how he has his community here.

Speaker:

This is where he has his services. This is where he knows. And he also, part of how he makes

Speaker:

an income is selling why they call him the pirate. He looks like a pirate. He goes by the pirate.

Speaker:

He sells costume gear. That's what he said and in the market. So he has a life. connected

Speaker:

to Kensington Market, connected to that community. And they're saying, we're gonna send you out

Speaker:

to Scarborough and you'll have to figure it all out. I know that there was a couple, a

Speaker:

husband and wife who lived there and oftentimes what happens is you're not allowed to stay

Speaker:

with your partner, your spouse. They separate you when they sent you to shelters. They have

Speaker:

really early curfews, drug use is prohibited, which like... You can't just prohibit drug

Speaker:

use if someone is addicted. The cold turkey is not how you do this. There is a process,

Speaker:

right? And a lot of people will say, a lot of people are choosing to live there. And that's

Speaker:

correct. But it is correct in a way, right? Even if there was a shelter bed available,

Speaker:

right? The city tries to scoop folks up once in a while and shuffle them off to shelter

Speaker:

space, not. Those shelter spaces are not even for everybody. They were never intended to

Speaker:

suit everybody and they are not safe for everybody. Not even close the amount of deaths that occur

Speaker:

in homeless shelters in the city. I wish I had the figures. It was in our episode with Diana

Speaker:

Chan McNally. These are not safe places for the most part, even when we have the space.

Speaker:

I'm going to give the mic over and I'm going to read out the words of Maggie Helwig, the

Speaker:

reverend of St. Stephen the Fields Church, because she puts this quite well. So I'm just going

Speaker:

to go over this. The city makes things sound very simple and there are so many complexities

Speaker:

around encampments and shelter, which most people don't understand. To say that everyone in the

Speaker:

encampment was offered shelter, hotel space is not simple. First, the only shelter hotel

Speaker:

left downtown is for women only. Men and couples can only be accommodated a great distance from

Speaker:

their established supports, relationships and sometimes employment. People don't always have

Speaker:

TTC fare and commutes can be long. Second, shelter hotels have nightly bed checks at a time which

Speaker:

is very early for adult human beings, especially if they need to commute a long distance to

Speaker:

and from the hotel for supports, jobs and friendships. Hotels vary in their policy but most are very

Speaker:

quick to evict from minor issues, especially missing bed check. At least one of the people

Speaker:

at our encampment described as Bed check. That sounds like fucking prison. I'm sorry to interrupt,

Speaker:

but like one can't help but hear that and cringe. Yeah. At least one of the people in our encampment

Speaker:

described as quote unquote declining service has already accepted two referrals to hotels

Speaker:

and both times was rapidly evicted for missing bed checks. At this point, they're understandably

Speaker:

not willing to take another referral. And then there's a person who was trying to get a hotel

Speaker:

room or any kind of emergency shelter for months, but was refused because the city database listed

Speaker:

him as quote-unquote housed, and workers believed he just quote-unquote didn't want to go back.

Speaker:

In fact, he was evicted from city-funded housing run by a well-known housing provider last summer.

Speaker:

He wasn't even told by workers that they thought he was housed. They just didn't offer him anything.

Speaker:

I have no official position. I'm just a friend. But I believe what he tells me. Eventually,

Speaker:

I was able to sort out what was going on and run around between different agencies to get

Speaker:

papers for him so he could quote unquote prove that he was homeless. I'm glad he got a shelter

Speaker:

hotel room yesterday, but how many people are caught up in situations like this, without

Speaker:

friends who happen to be good at navigating bureaucracies? So many individual people, so

Speaker:

many individual stories, so much complexity which news stories hardly ever manage to cover.

Speaker:

Those are the words of Maggie Helwig, who has been supporting the encampment for a year and

Speaker:

a half, who knows incredibly intimately the inner workings of this system, how it happens

Speaker:

and has seen its failures over and over again. Now I want to be clear about something. We're

Speaker:

not saying encampments are the ideal fucking solution here. Like we need housing. Everyone

Speaker:

needs housing. And in the winter, encampments are particularly brutal. Like I remember early

Speaker:

summer in May, I went camping once. And it was a time when temperatures still drop quite a

Speaker:

bit at night. And it was brutal, I could barely sleep. And I had a sleeping bag and it was

Speaker:

not winter. Trying to survive in the winter, spending all of your times outdoors is incredibly

Speaker:

fucking difficult. It's a level of cold that we cannot imagine. And, you know, when it comes

Speaker:

to, you know, like, I mean, drug use is so incredibly stigmatized and everything. Um, yeah, like,

Speaker:

I think it's the most fucking normal thing in the world to turn to drugs in those situations.

Speaker:

Because how the fuck are you supposed to survive that? um otherwise right like you need some

Speaker:

sort of escape i completely understand it so for all of those people who are blaming home

Speaker:

i mean a lot of times it's the homelessness that comes first and then drug addiction very

Speaker:

often because there should be no contingencies on shelter like at all right we house the most

Speaker:

evil fucking people okay we put them in prison or they have massive houses on the bridle path.

Speaker:

Either way, like, there's no contingencies, none. None.

Speaker:

Your humanness, right? That is absolutely it. That's the whole basis of human rights, right?

Speaker:

That they are indivisible and inalienable, right? You deserve them no matter what, even when

Speaker:

it hurts, you know, even when, you know, the bad guys, quote unquote, you know? I mean,

Speaker:

This is clearly written in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and I'm going to quote from

Speaker:

it real quick. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being

Speaker:

of himself and his family, including food, clothing, housing, and medical care and necessary social

Speaker:

services, and that right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability,

Speaker:

widowhood, old age, or lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond their control. clearly

Speaker:

laid out. And we are failing so much. Our so-called housing first strategy, which is just, you

Speaker:

know, stolen term from Finland's housing first strategy is not really, like our housing first

Speaker:

strategy is shelters, not actual housing. Meanwhile, in Finland, while the entirety of the European

Speaker:

Union has seen an increase in homelessness, Finland hasn't. Finland has seen numbers go

Speaker:

down because they decided to actually house people. And I'm not saying that Finland has

Speaker:

a perfect system figured out because I don't know. But I do know that Finland is the only

Speaker:

country in the European Union that is seeing a decrease. And they're committed to actually

Speaker:

providing housing for people. And there are multiple studies on this that show that it

Speaker:

actually costs more. It actually costs more to not end homelessness. So this is a policy

Speaker:

choice. Homelessness is a fucking policy choice. This is a decision that our government makes

Speaker:

to allow this. We could house everybody. We have more than enough land. This is the second

Speaker:

biggest country in the world by landmass. Toronto is a fucking joke. It's so not dense. And even

Speaker:

on a small scale, you have Mayor Olivia Chow making these choices, making these policy choices

Speaker:

that will kill people. And I don't know how many housing, we talked about her a couple

Speaker:

of weeks ago, where how many Palestinian activists or folks that are pro-Palestinian have been

Speaker:

felt betrayed by her in the last month. And now I can only imagine every housing advocate

Speaker:

or homelessness advocate is just sitting there, scratching their heads, wondering like, what

Speaker:

you have to do in terms of municipal politics to end encampment evictions if it's not electing.

Speaker:

a figure like Olivia Chow. And I know folks will be like, oh, there was other options on

Speaker:

the table. You know, Kevin Clark comes to mind, certainly someone who would have more principles

Speaker:

in terms, and Chloe Brown, in terms of evicting folks from these parquettes, I would like to

Speaker:

think. But that is maddening, especially you just briefly touched on the armories. And I

Speaker:

know, again, there's a million reasons why folks are loving to defend Olivia Chow and her reasons

Speaker:

for turning down. the feds offer for the armories, even if it was for a limited time and just

Speaker:

a fraction of what the feds had promised her, there are people that are going to die in the

Speaker:

cold. The first cold snap, you bet your bottom dollar, there's gonna be additions to the memorial.

Speaker:

And... Yeah. Somebody was already overdosing when I was there. The morning that they were

Speaker:

clearing the encampment. Yeah. Right, which, once again. I don't believe that was a coincidence.

Speaker:

Can you imagine if you were Mayor Santiago? Like this is another human being. This is someone

Speaker:

who's worked on very similar campaigns that we've worked on, supported by really good people

Speaker:

that we know. And can you imagine you finally got to like this spot? Like you're not sitting

Speaker:

behind a mic raging about what coulda, shoulda. You're there, you're in the seat, you have

Speaker:

super mayor powers, and still the clock comes out in the dead of night. to destroy what little

Speaker:

homeless unhoused folks have. And let's talk about the claw for a second, right? Because,

Speaker:

so like I said, Humber, we got that email late on the night of Thursday. It was reported then

Speaker:

at that time, the city has informed us that they would be carrying out the eviction at

Speaker:

eight in the morning. I heard from CTV, I think it was, or CP24, someone reported seven to

Speaker:

nine. So on Friday, which is the day that the Humber paper comes out, and I need to be there

Speaker:

to make sure the paper comes out, I instead chose to head down. At 6.30 in the morning,

Speaker:

I was down at St. Stephen in the Fields. Shortly after, pretty much the entirety of Canadian

Speaker:

media showed up. CBC, Global News, Toronto Star, CP24, City TV, everyone. There was. four big

Speaker:

cameras, four or five, there was tons of journalists. And of course, the Hoser was also there. The

Speaker:

Hoser, by the way, I need to point people. And we're going to put this in the show notes.

Speaker:

The Grind, which connected the Hoser, their latest edition just came out. Megan Kinch wrote

Speaker:

a fantastic article about Kensington's encampments. And we're going to link that. This came out

Speaker:

right before. And it has tons of information on the history of. at St. Stephens, at Bellevue

Speaker:

Park, Sonia's Park at, and it's a must read for learning more about this. Anyways, so journalists

Speaker:

are plenty, plenty of journalists. You had your anarchists were there, you had a lot of local

Speaker:

community members were there. I saw a call go out late that night from friends of Kensington

Speaker:

to show up. So there was a lot of people, arguably almost. It was decided, Maggie Helwig said

Speaker:

that there would be no land defense, which, and that's what we do, you know, we follow

Speaker:

the lead of the residents, you know, they say whether or not they want us to defend the land

Speaker:

or not. It's worked in the past, it's failed in the past, you know. I think of Landport

Speaker:

Stadium as a particularly visible failure. But before that, it worked at Landport Stadium.

Speaker:

And there's another, there's a square. Just south of King Street in Toronto that was defended

Speaker:

for a very long time successfully. I'm not going to let you call it a failure because I want

Speaker:

to just check you there because very recently we've learned of like how people are politicized

Speaker:

on the line. So even when lines break and bodies are smashed quite often it you can still look

Speaker:

at that as some sort of gain. Yes, but that one that one was difficult. Because that changed

Speaker:

you. Yeah. But I'm not gonna lie though, that one hurt. And you know, I've talked to a lot

Speaker:

of people who were there since, and that one still... Like yeah, it was a radicalizing moment,

Speaker:

but it fucking hurt, that one. The good news is, you know, 25... There were 25 trespass

Speaker:

tickets that were given and 6 of the protesters were facing heavier charges. Those 25 tickets

Speaker:

were withdrawn and the 6 protesters who were facing charges got absolute discharges. This

Speaker:

was earlier this year. So, I mean, in that sense, you know, that was very good news there. But

Speaker:

yeah, so like I said, Maggie told everyone that there would be no land offence, right? And

Speaker:

at that point it was a little crowded, you know, it got a bit intense, but people needed to

Speaker:

be there to witness. People needed to be there to witness. At that point in time, then very

Speaker:

late on, like nine, city arrives. and they start, you know, quote unquote negotiating, which

Speaker:

I would use the word coercing, if you're asking me. We are. To get people to accept shelter

Speaker:

spaces, you know, get them to clear out peacefully, right? Now, sometime around 10 a.m., I had

Speaker:

to go, I had to go. I had no choice. The paper, I needed to get back and I needed to write

Speaker:

my op-ed, which was okay. I mean, I got the points across, but I feel like I wasn't as

Speaker:

coherent as usual because I was having to write really quickly. And we got a new story about

Speaker:

it too. You know, I had a couple other Humber journalists. But anyways, my point being is

Speaker:

that I had to leave, as journalists often do. And this is something that, in the world of

Speaker:

so many layoffs in journalism, it's true for everyone. So the vast majority of journalists

Speaker:

there, pretty much all, like all of the major media... They had to leave at some point because

Speaker:

you're not allowed to stay all day on one story because there's not enough journalists hired

Speaker:

So that they could commit that kind of personnel to one story, right? And the city knows this

Speaker:

because the city put out a media request They put out they announced it to everybody that

Speaker:

this was happening and I spoke to multiple Majority everyone was fucking confused about that. Everyone

Speaker:

was like, what do you mean? The city is telling us this they don't tell us this This is not

Speaker:

something they do Because they wanted the cameras to capture the coercion, the negotiations.

Speaker:

They wanted us there for the peaceful part. Right. They wanted us there for the peaceful

Speaker:

part, right? They wanted to make it look... They wanted the PR to be as good as possible.

Speaker:

And then... 17 hours later, I think it was, I forget what number. It was late, it was late

Speaker:

that I saw it, eight, nine o'clock at night. Eight, nine o'clock at night. That's over time.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's when they brought out the claw, that's when they brought out the police, and

Speaker:

that's when they brought out their private militias. Sorry, private security, some would say. At

Speaker:

that point, barely anyone was still there. There was people still there, they got footage, but

Speaker:

there was not a lot, not nearly as much, and definitely not. major journalists. And that

Speaker:

was a calculated fucking move. They wanted it to be in the dead of night. They wanted the

Speaker:

eyes of the world to be looking elsewhere while they crushed the encampment. And there was

Speaker:

still someone there. And now there's 24-7 surveillance by private security. So nobody sets up camp

Speaker:

again. So nobody said something happened again. They haven't let them know that they will be

Speaker:

given trespass. They will be trespassed if they attempt to return. Right. Rumor has it there's

Speaker:

a few other parks that are slated for renovations. But the first step is going to be to clear

Speaker:

out folks, then fence it off and do the same thing. Monitor it so that nobody sets up shop

Speaker:

there, so to speak. But one thing I also want to mention is. When people accept shelter spaces,

Speaker:

oftentimes you're not allowed to bring many belongings with you, very little belongings

Speaker:

with you, right? You're not allowed to bring your tents, you're not allowed to bring the

Speaker:

things you need for an encampment, right? That is part of the conditions. So the city does

Speaker:

that because they wanna destroy it. They keep destroying tents. There was one of the residents...

Speaker:

who mentioned that they had that tent destroyed eight times. They've gone through eight tents

Speaker:

destroyed by the city. Right? They're doing that on purpose to prevent more encampments.

Speaker:

But they're not providing an alternative. They're failing to provide an alternative. Something

Speaker:

which was it London or Guelph or Waterloo, someone had or the Superior Court had said something

Speaker:

about it. Yeah, it had said something about this being a violation of some, like they said

Speaker:

this is unacceptable. What was it? I forget the word. Yeah, it was definitely a violation

Speaker:

of, I think, their charter rights, because it was very specific to the region of Waterloo

Speaker:

that their capacity for on-house folks within the shelter system was so small. And so to

Speaker:

remove the only means of shelter that there was, would be to then remove their right to

Speaker:

shelter and knowingly deny them any alternative, right? Yeah. So that's definitely the case

Speaker:

in Toronto. That's definitely the case in Toronto. There's not nearly enough shelter space, not

Speaker:

the shelters or anything even fucking remotely. And like we've already outlined all the issues

Speaker:

with the shelters, right? So. Yeah, this when I when we kicked off the episode and I mentioned

Speaker:

how Olivia Chau is more concerned it seems about the PR That's what I mean. The way that they

Speaker:

did this shouts to me that they were concerned about public image they didn't want the images

Speaker:

of Landport Stadium or Alexandra Park or Trinity Bellwood's That's part of Tori's legacy, right?

Speaker:

This is going to be the new glossier version of eviction important to mention a lot of these

Speaker:

residents came from Alexandra Park, right? Alexandra Park, which was famously evicted in the summer

Speaker:

of 21, which was a fucking horrible summer, horrible summer, horrible summer. God, like,

Speaker:

yeah, there was a much bigger and they had the tiny houses there too, which the city had outlawed,

Speaker:

you know, like I remember seeing the tiny houses in Alexandra Park. It was a much It was a much

Speaker:

better, like I'll tell you this, it was a hell of a lot cleaner, safer of an encampment. Like

Speaker:

there was less like, like when I say that, I mean like St. Stephen and Fields is such a

Speaker:

small space that it was like overflowing. And Alexander Park, it was like a more, it was

Speaker:

a better space for this, you know, it was a better space for this. And they, they kicked

Speaker:

them out. And for, for months after, if not a year after or more, they had, they fenced

Speaker:

off the whole park. to prevent encampments from being set up again, right? And again, the church

Speaker:

right on the corner of Dundas and Bathurst there also gives a lot of support. They have much

Speaker:

later hours than other libraries because they offer a lot of support to the residents there.

Speaker:

So shout out to that church, to that library, I forget which library that is. But yeah, you

Speaker:

can see like, this is... They're not trying to solve this issue. This is them trying to

Speaker:

hide it. You know, they don't want us to see this. And yeah, I'm so angry. I'm so disgusted

Speaker:

at Olivia Chow. Like is this is who you are. You, you who once stood with the encampments.

Speaker:

Like, and, and this is a lesson, not that we need this lesson again, but in trusting elected

Speaker:

politicians. They constantly show us that they don't deserve our trust. And yeah, that's what

Speaker:

I got for this. Oh, you know what? I have one more thing. A quote. The true measure of any

Speaker:

society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members. So how does our society

Speaker:

measure up? That's what I got. Well, as we move to our second topic, I'm, you know, as you

Speaker:

mentioned, repeated, repeated displacement when I can't also. not think of Gaza and some communities

Speaker:

that have been bombed in every single war, yet they managed to rebuild. So let our gaze turn

Speaker:

that way as we talk to what is most pressing in terms of the siege on Gaza was a exchange

Speaker:

of prisoners and hostages. So as you hear this, there may have been more exchanges. But 24

Speaker:

Israeli hostages were released into Egypt to go home to their families. And among them was

Speaker:

someone as young as two years old. As a mom, that was tough to imagine, to be honest. They

Speaker:

reported to be in excellent condition by a pediatrician who has looked at them. They have been reunited

Speaker:

with their families. And the entire deal looks to return 50 women and children hostages, taken

Speaker:

by Hamas. And 39 Palestinian prisoners were released into the West Bank. And hopefully

Speaker:

some of you have seen the celebrations that happened with those homecomings brought home

Speaker:

as heroes, a lot of them. Of course, obviously the Israeli forces fired tear gas into some

Speaker:

of the celebrations. They wanted this to not be the images shown across the planet. And

Speaker:

I think watching that obviously brings up a lot of my first feeling was to those assholes

Speaker:

whose only response to everything we see and everything we say is, yeah, we'll free the

Speaker:

hostages. What about the hostages? And yeah, like this isn't to minimize the fact that there

Speaker:

were toddlers as hostages and people, innocent civilians, some of them. taken into Gaza and

Speaker:

should be home with their families, no doubt. But it was just so dismissive. And I want to

Speaker:

know. I wanted to know from those people when they see these images, what the fuck they think,

Speaker:

seeing women and children released by Israel. They have not been held since October 7th.

Speaker:

Some of them have been in jail for years. Young people. 22, 23-year-old women that have been

Speaker:

in jail for eight, nine years. The entire deal, if it goes through, will see aid go into Gaza,

Speaker:

which was kind of a sticking point for a little bit there, and 150 Palestinian women and children,

Speaker:

which are among the thousands that are being held in Israeli jails right now. And so, for

Speaker:

me, that's— I wanted to unpack that a little bit, especially because I was on a Twitter

Speaker:

space, I think it was yesterday, and there was somebody on the space, they wanted to have

Speaker:

as few personal details released as possible. And they were talking about their experience

Speaker:

in the Israeli prisons being released. And I think some of us can kind of imagine the conditions

Speaker:

that they would have been describing, but it was the psychological impact. that he really

Speaker:

focused on and that was very difficult to hear considering how young a lot of these folks

Speaker:

are and that we know Israel makes it is a regular pattern for them to detain between 500 and

Speaker:

1000 children every single year. You know, they take that position of taking hostages, civilians

Speaker:

as hostages, and then they will sometimes look at the situation and look to the crimes that

Speaker:

they've been accused of. And again, it's like we're back at October 7th again, where folks

Speaker:

are looking at every individual case, completely absent from the larger context. And there was

Speaker:

a tweet from CPCpitchbot that really kind of brought it home for me. And it wasn't as successful

Speaker:

as I thought it should have been because it really, like I laughed out loud, even though

Speaker:

it's not anything really funny. It's talking about how a lot of these folks are accused

Speaker:

of stabbing or attempting to stab soldiers, settlers in the West Bank. But nobody's asking

Speaker:

why the fuck there are Israeli soldiers in the West Bank. Why are there Israeli settlers in

Speaker:

the West Bank? They're not supposed to be, right? Like that land isn't for them. The UN has deemed

Speaker:

that an illegal occupation that people can resist. And I don't understand why they don't understand

Speaker:

why people are resisting it violently. Like how long you can expect, if you've listened

Speaker:

to our episode with Danny Morrison talking about the conditions in Belfast, like how long you

Speaker:

can expect conditions to exist that are illegal under international law, a siege, an occupation.

Speaker:

before your children start looking at that and wanting to fight back. Right? Rightly so. And

Speaker:

I don't know. It was just, I want to, I do really want to know what these folks think of their

Speaker:

Israeli state at the moment. Now that it's, it's more obvious than ever how many women

Speaker:

and children they're holding. Right? Like I feel like they tried to hide that for a really

Speaker:

long time. We knew, because we talked to the Palestinian diaspora and activists all the

Speaker:

time. We've had Gata Sasa on our show. Most of what she talked about were political Same

Speaker:

with the Palestinian youth movement when they were on, right? They really did want to focus

Speaker:

on how many they were, how many are held without charge, how many children are amongst them.

Speaker:

And for people to just scream at us this entire time, what about the hostages? And yeah, what

Speaker:

about them? What about all those political prisoners that are still in those jails? Like it really

Speaker:

got, this is such an indictment to like the communications that have been had. And the

Speaker:

way that... There's a lot you can deduce from what they're hiding. The fact that they're

Speaker:

preventing prisoners who were released by Hamas from talking to the media, I think, is, it

Speaker:

says a lot. Because remember the first ones that we spoke to talked, they shook hands with

Speaker:

their captors and thanked them. Yeah. This is not, this is not how they speak of their Israeli

Speaker:

jailers. No, and one thing, because a lot of people know, there's a lot of Islamophobia

Speaker:

going around, you know, and one thing that I've heard from a lot of people who, a lot of Israelis

Speaker:

who have been interacting, who have either who were released or who interacted with Hamas

Speaker:

on October 7th, was things along the lines of, do not worry, I will not hurt you, my Muslim

Speaker:

faith does not allow it, which I think is a very different image, and this is not, you

Speaker:

know, these are the words of Israelis. there, that information is coming directly from them.

Speaker:

That is not the image that you hear when people talk about so-called Islamic extremism here.

Speaker:

And I'm not gonna deny that there is not extremism. I'm of the belief that every religion can be

Speaker:

used for extremism, no matter how pure and spiritual you think your religion is, I think it can

Speaker:

be twisted for those usage. But what I am saying here is that the extent of that, it's very

Speaker:

clear that is being played up in order to kind of bring about the same kind of memories of

Speaker:

ISIS and Al-Qaeda, 9-11, you know, like these are the images that they want to conjure up

Speaker:

in the West because Islamophobia has been used for the last 20 years, more than 20 years,

Speaker:

for these purposes, right? So the other thing, the Israeli government had been, you know,

Speaker:

painting the picture of like, oh, we're going to release, like, oh, we're going to have to

Speaker:

release these terrorists, right? These violent terrorists, these, like, they made it seem

Speaker:

like they're prisoners were all incredibly, you know, violent and justifiable, right? But

Speaker:

we're seeing, you know, with the amount of young, young children. That's not the case. And hearing

Speaker:

of solitary confinement, again, solitary confinement has been described as cruel and unusual forms

Speaker:

of torture, which are outlawed by human rights in United Nations. Not that matters, I guess.

Speaker:

And also, the use of tear gas, firing tear gas into the welcome home celebrations. Well, the

Speaker:

use of tear gas in interstate conflict is also a war crime. Not that matters. I want to get

Speaker:

into the charges a little bit because a lot of folks, like you say, they are labeling these

Speaker:

people as terrorists. And although, you know, every individual story has its own backstory

Speaker:

and folks can see for themselves. In general, there's a Save the Children report that was

Speaker:

particularly damning in terms of talking about Palestinian children in Israeli jails, and

Speaker:

they reported that the majority of charges for youth in Israeli jails is for throwing stones

Speaker:

at illegal occupiers. And how long do you think the sentence is? You better not have checked

Speaker:

my notes, Santiago. How long do you think a sentence is for a Palestinian child throwing

Speaker:

a stone? 15 years. 20. See, I see you understood the cruelty that would be woven into it, but

Speaker:

not quite as much. 20 years can be the sentence for kids. And so... It's more... Just to show

Speaker:

you, and I need to draw this comparison. What's the average age of Gaza? 18. So that's... That

Speaker:

sentence is higher than the median age of Gaza. That speaks volumes. And they have thousands

Speaker:

of children and not just children. So they hold political prisoners we know, right? Folks that

Speaker:

are in there with, under administrative detention, we've explained this in many episodes, that's

Speaker:

without charge. So they're suspected of being terrorists. We let the United States, and even

Speaker:

there's parts in Canadian law that allow folks to be held under suspicion. But like, this

Speaker:

is ridiculous. They are held for years and years and years without charge. Like, we're talking

Speaker:

5,200 prisoners. Plus, something that nobody seems to be willing to talk about, especially

Speaker:

since they center everything on the Israeli hostages, is that 3,000 Palestinian, mostly

Speaker:

men, have been abducted by Israeli forces since October 7th. So that's another 3,000 prisoners.

Speaker:

So they're almost that we know of. So they're close to 10,000 political prisoners in Israeli

Speaker:

jails, yet still we will justify them bombardment of Gaza because of a few hundred. Now, according

Speaker:

to international law, not once again, you know, but occupied people have the right to resist

Speaker:

occupation. to fight back against occupation, right? The West Bank is occupied territories

Speaker:

throwing a stone. They have the goddamn fucking right to throw a fucking stone, right? I start

Speaker:

with that because according to like the definition of genocide, forcibly transferring children

Speaker:

out of a group is part of the one of the five acts of genocide, right? Now Israel will attempt

Speaker:

to justify that by saying that they committed crimes. But as I said, they have the fucking

Speaker:

right to throw those rocks. I'm going to jump in here because, you know, I gave you a number

Speaker:

and they don't jive because I want folks to understand that. So every year Israel detains

Speaker:

up to a thousand, five hundred to a thousand children a year. Now they don't charge all

Speaker:

of them. They don't jail all of them. But I tell you that they brutalize all of them. OK,

Speaker:

and psychologically damage them. And that's another big part of this siege on Gaza is—and

Speaker:

absolutely, this is part of Gaza—to emotionally, mentally damage an entire population. And you

Speaker:

absolutely do this by bombing their mosques, bombing their hospitals, hunting down their

Speaker:

journalists who dare tell their story, and taking their children and moving them through a Zionist

Speaker:

prison system, even if you do end up releasing them back to their families. They end up terrified,

Speaker:

angry, emotionally damaged. Like the person that was on the Twitter space talking about

Speaker:

their experience talked about not being able to go to the bathroom even still until someone

Speaker:

tells them that they can and that they've wet themselves many times because they have just

Speaker:

been so conditioned in all these ways and that how they wake up at six o'clock every morning

Speaker:

screaming because they think they've missed roll call or bed check. And another thing that

Speaker:

people aren't talking about is the conditions in these prisons has gotten so much worse since

Speaker:

October 7th. So the Israeli government has been collectively punishing the prisoners that they've

Speaker:

already been punishing as political prisoners, even more so. So many of them, including a

Speaker:

lot of the released folks that you, the 39 prisoners that I referenced earlier, 17 of which are

Speaker:

minors still. They were mostly in solitary confinement. since October 7th, those that weren't have

Speaker:

had their cells completely stripped of any personal belongings. They are routinely grouped in together

Speaker:

for lockdowns and just the conditions have deteriorated. We're talking about medical negligence. What

Speaker:

are some of the numbers here? Like 69% of those children that go through the system, they're

Speaker:

strip searched. 42% are injured even upon arrest and four out of five are beaten. in custody.

Speaker:

Yeah. And talking about the mental harm, just to bring it back there for a second, and this

Speaker:

is a report from the Euromed Human Rights Monitor. And this is from 2021, so you can imagine how

Speaker:

much worse it is now. 91% of Gaza's children suffer from PTSD. And that's likely before

Speaker:

this, yeah? I mean, those studies- 2021. Thank you. Yeah. So once again, you have to imagine

Speaker:

that's 100. You cannot. I feel like I have PTSD. I'm going to I don't know if this is something

Speaker:

you want to leave in or not. It sounds so silly. I was playing with my kid. Pillow pits, pillow

Speaker:

pits are like the thing in my house right now, and we have these big gray pillows on a couch,

Speaker:

and the game is to pile them and then crawl through them. And at one point, I'm like lying

Speaker:

between these big gray pillows with my daughter. And I have images of them being concrete floors

Speaker:

that have fallen on us.

Speaker:

I had to stop playing. I had to just, Mommy doesn't like this. I have to get up. Like I

Speaker:

had a moment. I had a real reaction there. Like I tried to stay as calm as possible and I felt

Speaker:

really silly. But how do folks live through this? Like. Sorry. I mean, I can talk personally

Speaker:

about that for a second, in a way. And when I say personally, I don't mean my own experience,

Speaker:

but my dad's experience as a child in Lebanon during the war. And

Speaker:

it's really, really difficult. It's something that, I mean, in the moment, the weird thing

Speaker:

about PTSD is that in the moment, it doesn't feel maybe as traumatizing as it is. Because

Speaker:

it's not post? Yeah, they, there's a certain almost, especially with children, like I remember

Speaker:

my dad talked about how one of the games that the children would kind of play. would be they'd

Speaker:

leave out tape recorders during times of bombing and conflict and they would record the sounds

Speaker:

of war when they would be hiding in bunkers and stuff. And then later they would go and

Speaker:

they would listen to it. And they didn't kind of process at the time the severity of that.

Speaker:

You know. a lot of things became very normal like you know, oh am I going to be able to

Speaker:

go to school today or is there going to be bombings? I've heard all kinds of stories of you know

Speaker:

various close calls. My grandmother accidentally turned the light on when she was doing the

Speaker:

laundry and she had to jump to the floor because immediately a burst of machine gun fire burst

Speaker:

through their apartment. And in the moment, all of these things feel like life, a part

Speaker:

of life. But my, like, you know, my dad ever since, I remember every time there was a birthday

Speaker:

of mine or any celebration, he hated the fucking balloons. He couldn't be anywhere near the

Speaker:

balloons. In case they popped? In case they popped because it would freak him out. And

Speaker:

I remember he talked about listening back to those recordings and just like, what that did

Speaker:

and f***. He didn't go back to Lebanon until 2019 when I went with him for such a long time.

Speaker:

And it was, I mean, getting to see that it was incredibly powerful experience for him. Um,

Speaker:

and it's, it's done. I saw what it did to things of my grandfather, things to my dad, like it.

Speaker:

It's incredibly difficult and they don't have it. They didn't have it. anywhere near as bad

Speaker:

as those in Gaza, because the war wasn't a constant in Babdah. It would come and they would flee,

Speaker:

because they had somewhere to flee. They would go up to the cottage, a cottage in the mountains

Speaker:

that was owned by a family member, or they would go to Jurnie, a bit north of Beirut, which

Speaker:

was always isolated from the conflict. They were able to get away from it. But those in

Speaker:

Gaza... You have to stay and hope. I can tell you that anytime things got anywhere near as

Speaker:

risky as they are every single moment in Gaza, they would not be there. They would not be

Speaker:

waiting for their building to fall on top of them. Folks in Gaza, yeah, they don't have

Speaker:

a choice, right? We've talked about that before, how they've been moved from the north to the

Speaker:

south and there was no cessation of bombing in the south either. So... Part of the prisoner

Speaker:

exchange was a truce, is what they're calling it, and it's just days, a lot of skepticism

Speaker:

on this truce happening over the American Thanksgiving weekend, which includes Black Friday and Cyber

Speaker:

Monday. I can understand people's reaction to that. But what we're seeing is folks in Gaza

Speaker:

attempting to return north. Now, whether that is to repopulate the north or to go find loved

Speaker:

ones trapped under the rubble or maybe to gather whatever belongings they can from what remains

Speaker:

of their neighborhoods, I don't know. But there's plenty of evidence to show that. Despite the

Speaker:

truce, Israel was firing upon folks trying to return to the north, making it clear that wasn't

Speaker:

anywhere to return to, that they have essentially colonized it by the looks of it, with the flags

Speaker:

that they've planted and the destruction that they've done. And so, you know, my first thought

Speaker:

was when the prisoners—or one of my thoughts, I guess, is— please don't release them into

Speaker:

Gaza. Because... I just imagine the IDF hunting these folks down afterwards to make sure they

Speaker:

don't talk about their experiences, to either terrorize them into doing so, or as we know

Speaker:

now, just simply bombing the home in which they live. Even folks in the West Bank are completely

Speaker:

immune to state violence at this moment or ever have been. But yeah, I just, unfortunately,

Speaker:

that's my first thought. And so what happens after this truce? You know, these people go

Speaker:

home to their families, that is like an individual story to be told. But where is this going?

Speaker:

Like, Israel has said to the people of Gaza, the war is not over. Until when? Until when?

Speaker:

I don't know. That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for

Speaker:

joining us. Also, a very big thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Helu-Quintero.

Speaker:

Blueprints of Disruption is an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on

Speaker:

Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo.

Speaker:

Please share our content and if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only

Speaker:

does our support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out to us and

Speaker:

let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube