Artwork for podcast Radical Execution
How to Write OKRs That Don't Suck
25th February 2022 • Radical Execution • Krezzo
00:00:00 00:27:23

Share Episode

Shownotes

The amount of overwhelming instruction on OKRs is exhausting. So, we will walk you through how to structure a proper OKR, without all the fluff.


Transcripts

Stephen N.:

Alright, so we're back in the virtual lab talking

Stephen N.:

about some OKR creation

KJ:

How to write OKR's that don't suck.

Stephen N.:

Yeah. Can we just acknowledge how much crappy

Stephen N.:

information exists? Some of it? We've created ourselves.

Stephen N.:

Everybody's kind of Yeah. Yeah. Like, I mean, it's a process.

Stephen N.:

There's so much bad information out there.

KJ:

Yeah, it's the minute you open your computer. It's like a

KJ:

wave of garbage flowing into your face. Dead banana skins.

KJ:

You know? Just crap.

Stephen N.:

Yeah. And, and it's because you have to fail at this

Stephen N.:

stuff to actually get it right. It's proven true. I mean, we

Stephen N.:

started a damn company about it, and we've screwed it up.

KJ:

Yeah. What's funny, though, is like, the people that don't

KJ:

acknowledge the screw ups really make me laugh. You know, they're

KJ:

like, we have it all together. It's like, no, that that means

KJ:

you have nothing together. We're we're top notch at this stuff.

KJ:

It's like that. No, you're definitely not then.

Stephen N.:

Yeah. Well, you know, it's the attempt, though.

Stephen N.:

You got to start somewhere. Yeah, you gotta be honest with

Stephen N.:

yourself. I mean, we're being very honest. We're saying. We're

Stephen N.:

learning as we go and putting things in the right bucket and

Stephen N.:

labeling things correctly. And measuring correctly. And what's

Stephen N.:

a key result? What's not a key result? Like it's important, but

Stephen N.:

once you kind of Once it clicks, it clicks. And then if then the

Stephen N.:

goal is really getting it to click at scale.

KJ:

Yeah, yeah. Because the garbage man, outside. They've

KJ:

come in to collect this podcast,

Stephen N.:

we're coming to drop off a bunch of key results that

Stephen N.:

are out on the internet. Yeah. My favorites, just the ones that

Stephen N.:

are like, I mean, you he could Google up some examples, or

Stephen N.:

Google some examples, but the ones that just list like, write

Stephen N.:

five blog posts. Yeah. Schedule for meetings with my colleagues.

KJ:

Yeah, the vagueness is really great. Yeah.

Stephen N.:

attend an event. Yeah. That's really

Stephen N.:

groundbreaking stuff

KJ:

attempts attempt to get out of bed. Yeah, it's almost

Stephen N.:

like you know, when you when you like, create a to

Stephen N.:

do list and the first thing you put on your to do list is create

Stephen N.:

the to do list. Yeah. And then you check it off. It's like it's

Stephen N.:

a retroactive dopamine hit that you're trying, you're forcing by

Stephen N.:

doing something that sets the bar unbelievably low.

KJ:

Yeah, yeah. But what we should probably say, you know,

KJ:

is that the let's, let's try to dissect why that happens. And

KJ:

here's my Terry. I think, why that happens is because OKR is

KJ:

all about momentum. And you can only build momentum with

KJ:

confidence. And you build confidence with dopamine hits.

KJ:

So people know what to do. They love and they're confident in

KJ:

what they know. So that's immediately what they go to, if

KJ:

you ask them, like, write a key result, like, Gee, I don't know

KJ:

what, but what just write down what we should do next quarter,

KJ:

they go, Oh, well, I think we should improve the onboarding

KJ:

process and, and create a survey and, you know, interview the

KJ:

product managers about the survey. And it's like, Oh,

KJ:

right. So they start immediately listing out all the crap that

KJ:

they want to do, and they know how to do and they've been

KJ:

meaning to do it, but they haven't got around to it. That's

KJ:

immediately what people do. And then they just label them as key

KJ:

results. This is all the crap, you know. And they're done.

KJ:

Okay, done. That's my theory. That's my theory about what

KJ:

happens.

Stephen N.:

Yeah. I mean, we did it ourselves. We did it. I did

Stephen N.:

it ourselves.

KJ:

We were like, We got to create a website. Okay. That's a

KJ:

key result.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, we got to integrate the thing. We got to

Stephen N.:

build the feature. We got to build, you know, build a blog

Stephen N.:

post. Like we we did it ourselves, which is hilarious.

KJ:

Yeah. And then we're like, we're great, aren't we? Yeah.

KJ:

pat on the back.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, we go in and then we meet we meet about it.

Stephen N.:

We all look at each other. It's like, Oh, do we actually do the

Stephen N.:

thing? I don't know. Yeah, I did that. Oh, no, everything

Stephen N.:

changed. I couldn't do that. You know, it's like you're

Stephen N.:

recovering are we're justifying our own existence, in a little

Stephen N.:

operation that we have here. So it's funny, but it's true. It's

Stephen N.:

like go be honest with yourself and ask yourself why Why are we

Stephen N.:

trying to do these different things? And what is it going

Stephen N.:

going to actually improve? Is it just that, hey, my job is a BDR,

Stephen N.:

I pick up the phone, I pick up the phone, and I call 50. Guys,

Stephen N.:

and I send 50 emails, and that's what I do every day. And I get,

Stephen N.:

you know, 10% connects, and I get a meeting in five meetings a

Stephen N.:

week. Okay, and I could go on, and I could do that for the rest

Stephen N.:

of my life. Okay, that doesn't sound like a sounds like a

Stephen N.:

miserable existence. But where's the improvement there? What do

Stephen N.:

you want to improve? There are particular things you do you

Stephen N.:

want to improve the result of getting meetings? Do you want to

Stephen N.:

improve? Like, anyway, that's just a crappy example. But you

Stephen N.:

know, asking why we want to do different things and getting

Stephen N.:

very selective. And then breaking that down into

Stephen N.:

outcomes. That's the key.

KJ:

For example, yeah, yeah. So let's, let's take that, you

KJ:

know, okay, you've written down a whole list of crap that you

KJ:

have to do or that you've always wanted to do. Now, it's about

KJ:

recognizing the pattern, you know, determining which of these

KJ:

so you group them, you know, which of these are, you know,

KJ:

similar, and would actually be related to one another. And you

KJ:

use your, you know, inductive thinking to try and associate

KJ:

them and you group them, and then you label the groups. And

KJ:

then you can all look at them and say, as a team, if you're

KJ:

doing this as a team, which we always did sort of as teams, you

KJ:

look at all this crap, you just written down and go well, which

KJ:

is the most important here, like which most worthwhile? It seems

KJ:

like, this is what I what does everyone think? And then you

KJ:

sort of debate it, and you go, yeah, I think you know, what, we

KJ:

wrote a lot about improving the onboarding process. There's the

KJ:

objective, what do we want to achieve? Want to create a badass

KJ:

onboarding process for new customers? Great. Next step,

KJ:

quantify it. That's it, that's the key result is the

KJ:

quantifying of the objective. So what you're doing, it's putting

KJ:

a numeric value to the objective, that you can then

KJ:

through the process of a quarter, a certain time box

KJ:

cycle, you know, if you will, you attempt to improve the

KJ:

metric? So quantify how we're going to create a badass

KJ:

onboarding process? Well know, what KPIs do we currently use

KJ:

for onboarding, you know, time to value or, you know,

KJ:

engagement rate, I don't know you have, list them all out and

KJ:

do the same thing. Choose to be selective, choose the ones that

KJ:

know, you think representative.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, and the ones, the the control versus influence

Stephen N.:

part is, is important too. Because you can pick up you can

Stephen N.:

control, creating five web pages, you know, or creating a

Stephen N.:

new deck for the onboarding experience, you can't control

Stephen N.:

how that's received the satisfaction of it, the

Stephen N.:

engagement of it, there's, you know, maybe that's not the best

Stephen N.:

example. But like, the the key results paired with, you know,

Stephen N.:

initiatives and action. That's, that's where the magic happens.

Stephen N.:

Because like everybody, you know, to use the consumer

Stephen N.:

example, key result is I want to, right now weigh 250 pounds,

Stephen N.:

and I want to wait to 15. Great, that's a great key result,

Stephen N.:

reduce your weight by whatever 40% 20%. Well, to do that, what

Stephen N.:

do I need to do? Well, maybe go into the gym 10 times would be a

Stephen N.:

great start, or doing some sort of physical activity, something

Stephen N.:

new, not not the things that I do every day, stop eating

Stephen N.:

leftovers, or getting second helpings, like, whatever it

Stephen N.:

might be like, what's the actions that you're going to

Stephen N.:

take? Right?

KJ:

And that's where the teams, that's where you're empowering

KJ:

teams, we talk about empowerment? No, our approach

KJ:

here is to determine collectively what direction

KJ:

you're heading in, and then give the teams or in your case, the

KJ:

overweight person, that the teams the autonomy to decide how

KJ:

to get there, how to move that metric, okay, we have to move.

KJ:

We have to decrease customer churn. That's the direction

KJ:

we're going, that's how we're going to measure it. And it's

KJ:

going to be objective, we're not going to try and, you know,

KJ:

undermine the numbers somehow by changing things in Salesforce.

KJ:

We're gonna, like, try to move that objective. So what are we

KJ:

going to do? Experiment, that's the, that's the fuel that you

KJ:

need to try and influence the metric you've agreed upon. It's

KJ:

experimentations deciding Well, let's try this. Let's try that.

KJ:

That didn't work. Okay. Let's try something else.

Stephen N.:

Yep, that's what it's that's what it is, is just

Stephen N.:

trying to identify the biggest his priorities, the things that

Stephen N.:

you want to improve. And taking a crack at it, and doing

Stephen N.:

something different, and trying something new, I think that

Stephen N.:

that's important. It's like, you got your day to day stuff, you

Stephen N.:

know, everybody's got to pick up the phone, talk to customers,

Stephen N.:

you know, do write code, build pages, you got all your stuff,

Stephen N.:

but like, there's, there's time to extend yourself and push your

Stephen N.:

your limitations, because for every growing company, that's

Stephen N.:

what you got to do, you got to, you got to go above and beyond,

Stephen N.:

you know, these, these b2b SaaS companies that are no longer

Stephen N.:

startups and they want to, you know, hit that next phase of

Stephen N.:

growth, like you got to, you got to continuously improve. That's

Stephen N.:

what this is. This is like continuous improvement, and

Stephen N.:

changing behaviors and driving measurable outcomes.

KJ:

Yeah. But if you make your key results, outputs or

KJ:

initiative, or just any sort of actionable, you know, task or

KJ:

effort, instead of an outcome, and the outcome is, you know,

KJ:

the actual behavioral change that drive the result, you make

KJ:

your key results, like, create five blog posts, what a lot of

KJ:

crap, you know, if you make that your key results, not only it

KJ:

incurs a series of problems, it incurs a problem of, well, what

KJ:

if halfway through your quarter, things have changed. And now you

KJ:

have to pivot, but you've already committed to writing

KJ:

five blog posts. So what now have committed to doing this key

KJ:

results, and now I have to do something else, and you can't

KJ:

just simply change it, you know. So also, maybe it's like a

KJ:

domino effect. Maybe you write key results that are all action

KJ:

orientated. And if you don't do the first one, then you can't do

KJ:

the next three, you know, so just get out of that routine of,

KJ:

you know, when you quit when you write a key results, and you're

KJ:

going to try drafting them and you, you know, it's a scale.

KJ:

It's like riding the bike, you're not going to get it right

KJ:

the first time, but look at the key results and go, Are these

KJ:

just things like tasks I can do? Are they actual measurements? Do

KJ:

they have a measurable number, like a metric that quantifies

KJ:

this objective? Like, can? Are these key results? The question

KJ:

is, you know, how do I know when I've met this objective? Like,

KJ:

what's the number that gets influenced? When I've met this

KJ:

objective? That's the key results. Everything else is the

KJ:

effort that you do.

Stephen N.:

So what are some ways to kind of prevent poor key

Stephen N.:

result? Creation, if you're, you're you're meeting with your

Stephen N.:

team and teams are doing their 2022 planning, and they're

Stephen N.:

coming up with all their different key results. And

Stephen N.:

there, they got a laundry list of all these different KPIs that

Stephen N.:

they could potentially plug in and like, and they're starting

Stephen N.:

to draft them in the right num, and they're piecing it together?

Stephen N.:

And like, how can you prevent from from preventing yourself

Stephen N.:

from locking yourself into something that might not matter

Stephen N.:

halfway through the quarter? Like what are like, what are

Stephen N.:

some of the things that you can ask yourself, like to prevent

Stephen N.:

that from happening proactively?

KJ:

Yeah, well, I think it's a, it's a team exercise. So you

KJ:

have to ask the team, broadly, you can be the the leader

KJ:

hearing go. We're using this KPI as our key results. Everyone,

KJ:

you know that, that just demotivates every person in the

KJ:

room. So it's a team exercise, and just like determining any

KJ:

sort of prioritization, you, you lay them all out, and you group

KJ:

them together. Ideally, there's a KPI that you have already set

KJ:

in place that measures something already, that's in danger or not

KJ:

in danger, maybe, let's call it, you know, not where it's

KJ:

supposed to be. So you can identify a few five key KPIs for

KJ:

the onboarding process in your company. And one of them is

KJ:

satisfaction rate. And that's not where it's usually should be

KJ:

about 80% and it's down at 40. Well, then you already know if

KJ:

you can easily identify and prioritize. If you just look at

KJ:

the KPIs and see which ones aren't where they're supposed to

KJ:

be. But if they're all where they're supposed to be, maybe

KJ:

don't even need to choose one then. So, I don't know. What do

KJ:

you think what are ways to to get key results, you know, to

KJ:

choose the right one?

Stephen N.:

Well, I mean, I think the most simple simple

Stephen N.:

example that everybody can relate to is revenue. Right?

Stephen N.:

Everybody, everybody, annual recurring revenue, you know, for

Stephen N.:

b2b SaaS companies is the most critical metric, or monthly

Stephen N.:

recurring revenue if you do monthly programs, or monthly

Stephen N.:

products, but, you know, you're at, say, 5 million or 10 million

Stephen N.:

annual recurring revenue, and you're trying to get to 20

Stephen N.:

million, right? Like, that's, that's always like the top

Stephen N.:

priority for any business because businesses exist to make

Stephen N.:

money. But that can't be the only metric that gets measured.

Stephen N.:

And there's a lot of touch points and a lot of things that

Stephen N.:

happen from you know, that that journey, but if you're looking

Stephen N.:

at it objectively, and you say, alright, we want to, we want to

Stephen N.:

grow revenue, and be a highly profitable company, like, that's

Stephen N.:

our objective. And we were going to measure success by revenues

Stephen N.:

from 5 million to 10 million, or 10 million to 20 million,

Stephen N.:

whatever it might be. And you might look and say, Well, if we

Stephen N.:

just keep we've been growing at 100%, doing we've been doing,

Stephen N.:

like, great, maybe we don't we just keep going, and that's

Stephen N.:

fine. Or but maybe you look at a number and you go Yeah, Harry,

Stephen N.:

our VP of Sales ain't going to get us there. We like we need to

Stephen N.:

hire a chief revenue officer that's been there done that, or,

Stephen N.:

as an example, like, that's an initiative that you can, you

Stephen N.:

know, add to the mix. But I think baselining those numbers

Stephen N.:

is important. So you can always have a starting point in

Stephen N.:

comparing apples to apples when it comes to these metrics,

Stephen N.:

right? Like you mentioned, satisfaction, like, what what is

Stephen N.:

that number? Where do you derive that number from? Do we do a

Stephen N.:

survey? Are we going to use the same survey? Three months from

Stephen N.:

now, like, you gotta have a baseline metric? And you have to

Stephen N.:

be able to consistently reference that that's, I can

Stephen N.:

tell you like, from a marketing standpoint, that's the biggest

Stephen N.:

challenge is Apples to Apples measurements. Because, yeah,

Stephen N.:

hey, I want you know, a million new leads. Alright, great. Yeah,

Stephen N.:

maybe like we're quality leads, like you, if you're not

Stephen N.:

measuring the same things, consistently, you can gain the

Stephen N.:

system, you know, yes. But that gets a little bit more nuanced

Stephen N.:

in the funnel, I would say. But yeah, it's important to just

Stephen N.:

say, here's the link to the, to the report, and that's the one

Stephen N.:

we're going to look at, and the one we're going to track the

Stephen N.:

dots going up and down, whatever. And, and it's

Stephen N.:

unequivocal, it's unambiguous. It's very clear, that is the

Stephen N.:

report.

KJ:

And I think he touched on something which was that, you

KJ:

know, unless you have a balance in key results, you will really

KJ:

not encapsulate a holistic view of performance. So by that, I

KJ:

mean, if you're only measuring, it's very easy to go straight to

KJ:

revenue as a measurement, because it's unanimous, every

KJ:

human knows what money is. So like, it's easy to go to

KJ:

revenue, but you need to pair it with quality so that you have a

KJ:

balance, because you could grow revenues by X percent. But what

KJ:

if you're not incorporating retention? Now, what if you're

KJ:

just focusing on new SAS, but all your customers that you got

KJ:

last year are churning. So you know, you have to, and it's

KJ:

difficult to measure quality, or come out and say this really

KJ:

difficult, but nothing, everything can be measured.

KJ:

It's, it's whether the measurement is effective or not,

KJ:

there's so measurements and metrics that are more effective

KJ:

than others. But as we spoke with our our CTO, it's sometimes

KJ:

very difficult measuring engineering activities, but it's

KJ:

still worth measuring them, you know, it's, it's still worth

KJ:

having a bad measurement, then no measurement, unequivocally

KJ:

because at least you can learn, you know. So the two tips there

KJ:

as to add onto yours are that you should pair your key results

KJ:

have more than one basically, I think at least two so that you

KJ:

have a balance between quantity and quality. And also have the

KJ:

metrics there, even if they're, they don't encapsulate every

KJ:

single thing and effort you put in, at least you have a metric

KJ:

that as you say, you can track over time, you can objectively

KJ:

analyze, and try to learn from them, as you spoke about at the

KJ:

very beginning of the song, it's all the OKRs are just all laid

KJ:

out a movement of continuous learning.

Stephen N.:

And the third one I would add to that is health.

Stephen N.:

Right quality, quantity and health. It's like, Alright, I

Stephen N.:

want to say I want to increase lead count. Okay, I want to go

Stephen N.:

from 1000 to 2000. Great, that's awesome. based metric, I want to

Stephen N.:

improve the quality. Okay, great. So say you improve your

Stephen N.:

targeting, and you go right in LinkedIn, and you hone in on a

Stephen N.:

particular segment and you just nail it. Right? So you hit the

Stephen N.:

quality, you check the quality box, but you could piss off, a

Stephen N.:

lot of people in the health of your customer interaction can be

Stephen N.:

reduced significantly, if you show up to the website, and

Stephen N.:

there's just forms everywhere. And things dinging and, you

Stephen N.:

know, sign up here. It's like, yeah, you might increase volume.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, you might even increase quality. But you might piss off

Stephen N.:

a good segment of your customer base. You know, like, that's not

Stephen N.:

healthy. It's not a healthy and it's the same with employees.

Stephen N.:

It's like, okay, yeah, we want to increase revenue from X to Y.

Stephen N.:

Great. We want to increase, you know, our market share in this

Stephen N.:

particular segment. Great. But if we're burning everybody out

Stephen N.:

the health of our people whose sacrifice or jeopardize like, is

Stephen N.:

it worth it? Probably not. At some point, everybody can, you

Stephen N.:

know, say, uncle? You don't you want to get out in front of

Stephen N.:

that. You don't want to wait till it's too late. You know,

Stephen N.:

I've suffered from burnout before. You don't want to, like

Stephen N.:

your health is key, it's probably the most important

Stephen N.:

thing. Yeah,

KJ:

that's great. That's great examples of just those metrics

KJ:

and how to balance them, definitely don't make the

KJ:

mistake of all financial performance metrics, because

KJ:

they are the first things that come to mind. And naturally,

KJ:

you'll have them and it's important to have them but that

KJ:

balance is critical. If you want to sustain your business, your

KJ:

OKRs your people, you know, if you want more sustainable

KJ:

growth, it's it's about balance.

Stephen N.:

Yep. So I like for companies now that are creating

Stephen N.:

their annual ones. So they got the ideally the one at the top,

Stephen N.:

the tippity top that sort of collects and aggregates the

Stephen N.:

business. Is that is that do you aggregate key results across all

Stephen N.:

your different groups? Do? You know do you do get selective

Stephen N.:

about different ones quality quantity help you talk about

Stephen N.:

customers and people and business performance? Like how

Stephen N.:

do you kind of reconcile those different aspects of your

Stephen N.:

business and surface? The right ones to the top? Yeah,

KJ:

look at well, there's two parts to that question.

KJ:

surfacing the being selective and surfacing the right metrics

KJ:

to the top is a difficult process, it's unbelievably

KJ:

difficult, because you have to say, now, it's like, having 10

KJ:

Great ideas and only being allowed to pick one. So OKRs are

KJ:

about saying no, or at least not right now. So that's really

KJ:

going to be a difficult process. And it requires a lot of debate.

KJ:

But as you're saying, absolutely, we advocate here for

KJ:

simplicity with this stuff, like you can't make the mistake of

KJ:

trying to do five OKRs at the top and all these key results.

KJ:

No, just choose one, as you say, one OKR sits at the top of the

KJ:

company, very clear objective. And it's got three key results.

KJ:

And those are, you know, across as we maybe just said, your

KJ:

business, or maybe your you know, your financial

KJ:

performance, your customers and your employees. Start there, you

KJ:

know, if you want to add more for different business lines,

KJ:

you know, and you have to adapt them fine. Okay. But, you know,

KJ:

try to get boiled down to something as simple as that.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, I mean, yeah, I mean, if you think about it,

Stephen N.:

like the ideal pairing, and I may be curious to know what your

Stephen N.:

thoughts are. But like, if I was only given three key results for

Stephen N.:

this company, and say this company was to 300 people at 22.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, if I, if I was only given three, we would obviously get in

Stephen N.:

a room and we would debate it. But if it was just my decision,

Stephen N.:

it would be revenue, like, what's the quantity? The

Stephen N.:

quantity of dollars that we brought in? It would be churn?

Stephen N.:

are we retaining our current customers? And are we keeping

Stephen N.:

it? I actually know, I would say negative churn. What's the

Stephen N.:

quality of both our interactions with existing customers and

Stephen N.:

growing existing customers like negative churn would probably be

Stephen N.:

the way I would measure quality, and then employee satisfaction

Stephen N.:

and just do a quarterly survey or an annual survey or, you

Stephen N.:

know, that would be the initiative but like, I would

Stephen N.:

want to benchmark that, that number, maybe even do like use

Stephen N.:

the Q 12, the Gallup q 12. And just use that as your benchmark

Stephen N.:

and just say, well, this is this is what this is how we measure

Stephen N.:

success and then And those, those three right there, if you

Stephen N.:

had a company that was growing revenues, if you have a company

Stephen N.:

that's expanding your customers, and you had a company where your

Stephen N.:

Q 12 Number is, like, above a nine, you get a damn good

Stephen N.:

business, no matter what you're doing. You know,

KJ:

but no matter how really big you grow, those are the three

KJ:

components that are always there. You know, like, I guess

KJ:

you can go up to these massive company, but, you know, for, for

KJ:

tech companies growing. That's it. You just, you've just

KJ:

outlined the three key components, why not just put the

KJ:

OKR together with that? And that's it, then you don't have

KJ:

to worry about communicating 50 Vogan, OKR? One, there it is.

Stephen N.:

Yeah, now everybody has, they can see how they fit

Stephen N.:

into that, like, alright, well, I need to not waste money, I

Stephen N.:

need to help the company make money, I need to ensure that

Stephen N.:

these customers are happy. And I need to, you know, not be an

Stephen N.:

insufferable asshole to my colleagues. Right? You can

Stephen N.:

anybody can connect the dots. And I think we just did all the

Stephen N.:

annual planning for every business on the planet right?

Stephen N.:

Now, just just take that template and plug it in, it's

KJ:

free as well, if you just listen to the podcast,

Stephen N.:

but you know, below the surface, like that's

Stephen N.:

perfection, right? Like if you just nail it, but like below the

Stephen N.:

surface, the problem is, is, you know, your customers are turning

Stephen N.:

and growing revenue is difficult. And your people are

Stephen N.:

leaving, right, like we painted a rosy picture. But in reality,

Stephen N.:

there's, there's a lot of problems that every like, even

Stephen N.:

ourselves, like we need to grow revenue, we like I want to make

Stephen N.:

sure that everybody's happy. So do you like what our customers

Stephen N.:

we want to keep them happy, we want to grow them, like, like we

Stephen N.:

we have the same problems, how we fix that, and how we break

Stephen N.:

that down is is going to be, you know, how we structure our

Stephen N.:

program. It's implied, but the stuff cannot be ambiguous. And

Stephen N.:

objectives can't contain metrics. You maybe want to chat

Stephen N.:

about that one briefly.

KJ:

Like there's anything to chat about don't put metrics in

KJ:

your fucking objectives. Yeah, no, the objective is the

KJ:

inspiration. The key result is quantifying that inspiration.

Stephen N.:

That was funny as we started out, like talking about

Stephen N.:

making fun of some of the really poor examples. And we actually

Stephen N.:

like they're poor examples, because it's just the list of

Stephen N.:

stuff like writing blog posts, but there's actually even worse

Stephen N.:

examples out there for key results, it's like, get better

Stephen N.:

at the thing. Improve the world's happiness. Yeah, it's

Stephen N.:

like, no, that's ambiguous, that's vague. You're talking in

Stephen N.:

circles, you know, go work for corporate America, getting very

Stephen N.:

specific, you know, measurable, having that metric, verifiable,

Stephen N.:

like that. Those are key components of a good key result?

Stephen N.:

Well, the

KJ:

key results, as I said, probably five times arrays

KJ:

quantifying the objective. And that's difficult, but without a

KJ:

clear measurement, you resort to exactly what you're saying.

KJ:

subjectivity, it's just someone's judgment, you end up

KJ:

at the end of the quarter going. Okay, so let's look at this.

KJ:

Okay. Or, and everyone's going well, we did a few of those

KJ:

things. Let's say it's 60%. Let's say 70. Not split the

KJ:

difference. It's 65%. Done. Yeah. And you're like, it's just

KJ:

some dude in the room saying it's 65% done. That's not

KJ:

objectiveness. You know, so the key result is its power and this

KJ:

whole framework and why people love it and advocated for why we

KJ:

advocate for it is because that key result component takes the

KJ:

inspirational niceness of yeah, let's go data and attaches. Its

KJ:

objectivity where everyone, my grandmother, and everyone can

KJ:

come in and and look at it and go, the number move from five to

KJ:

10 Does No, no, no question about it. There was a clear

KJ:

objective, increase great job. You know, that's the pair of the

KJ:

key result and that's why you got to make sure it's it's a

KJ:

metric and that it's there's a balance

Links