At senior levels, challenge is constant, questions are direct, assumptions are tested in real time, and comments are brief and often ambiguous.

In this episode of Grounded and Aligned™, Karen Gombault begins a series on leadership skills that materially affect effectiveness in expanded roles.

The first: the ability to avoid turning routine business scrutiny into a "personal verdict", a.k.a. taking things personally.

Many experienced leaders know they “shouldn’t” take things personally. Yet in high-visibility settings, a short comment can trigger over-explanation, a neutral question can alter tone and composure, focus moves from the issue at hand to protecting credibility.

Karen examines why this happens, what it costs at VP and executive level, and why the habit intensifies during role transitions. She draws on client situations and her own experience managing sustained external pressure while carrying full executive accountability.

Karen looks at:

1. How interpretation changes behavior in the moment
2. Why visible defensiveness weakens authority
3. The relationship between internal self-assessment and external scrutiny
4. What destabilization does to judgment when scope expands
5. Why neutrality is a strategic discipline, not an emotional exerciseIf you are operating with broader mandate and exposure, your ability to separate fact from fiction and story directly affects decision quality and perceived steadiness.

This episode focuses on that separation — and why it becomes non-negotiable as responsibility increases.

Next steps:

Book Focus-15 Call

https://www.karengombault.com/schedule

Free Resource, The Identity Lag

https://www.karengombault.com/identity

Connect on LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/karengombault/