Artwork for podcast Power Movers
Sairam Sundaresan: Why AI Won't Save Your Business Until You Stop Being the Bottleneck
Episode 6618th April 2026 • Power Movers • Roy Castleman
00:00:00 00:28:36

Share Episode

Shownotes

EPISODE OVERVIEW

Duration: Approximately 28 minutes

Best For: Trapped entrepreneurs who keep hearing about AI and feel left behind, overwhelmed, or sceptical about whether it actually applies to their business

Key Outcome: A clear mental framework for deciding what to automate, what to keep human, and how to stop wasting time on the wrong tasks

He spent 15 years teaching machines to understand the world. Then he realised most business owners still can't understand AI.

THE BOTTOM LINE

You built your business to create freedom. That said, you're now answering emails at 5am, missing family dinners, and wondering if AI is just another thing that's going to add complexity to your already overwhelming life. Sairam Sundaresan has worked at Intel Labs, Qualcomm, and now leads engineering teams at Valeo teaching cars to drive themselves. He's also the author of AI for the Rest of Us and reaches 100,000 followers who trust him to cut through the noise. In this conversation, he reveals something that will change how you think about AI. It's not about learning 500 tools. It's about understanding which of your tasks are worth $10, which are worth $100, and which are worth $1,000, then letting AI handle the first two so you can finally focus on the work that actually moves your business forward. Because the trapped entrepreneur who figures this out doesn't just save time. They get their thinking back. They get their judgment back. They get their life back.

WHY THIS EPISODE MATTERS TO YOU

You'll discover why less than 2% of the world is actually using AI properly, which means you're not late, you're early, and there's still time to get this right before your competitors do

You'll learn the $10, $100, $1,000 task framework that instantly clarifies what to automate and what requires your irreplaceable human judgment

You'll understand why the business owners who go all in on AI risk feeling like robots, while the ones who stay strategic will dominate their markets

You'll stop feeling guilty about not keeping up with every new tool, because Sairam reveals that even people on the bleeding edge feel overwhelmed, and that's actually fine

KEY INSIGHTS YOU CAN IMPLEMENT TODAY

The algorithms have been around since the 1940s. What changed is data and infrastructure. This means AI isn't magic, it's pattern recognition at scale. When you understand this, you stop being intimidated and start seeing it as a tool you can actually control.

Sort your tasks into three buckets. $10 tasks, $100 tasks, $1,000 tasks. AI should completely automate the first two. It should be a sparring partner for the third. If you're spending hours making AI do clever things on $10 tasks, you're losing money.

Human judgment matters more now than ever before. These models learn biases from data. They can't bring context the way you can. The trapped entrepreneur who understands this knows exactly when to hand off to AI and when to step in personally.

Writing by hand is now a superpower. When you outsource your thinking to AI, you get a dopamine hit without earning the knowledge. It disappears in 10 minutes. The business owners who write their thoughts first, then use AI to synthesise and challenge them, will outthink everyone else.

The principles change slower than the tools. Stop chasing every new model. Learn how to communicate your intent clearly to these systems. That skill transfers across every update, every platform, every new release.

GOLDEN QUOTES WORTH REMEMBERING

"AI should be helping you completely automate the $10 and the $100 tasks. It should help you brainstorm and be a good sparring partner for the $1,000 tasks." - Sairam Sundaresan

"We are writing the user manual as we go. So it's a fantastic time to get on." - Sairam Sundaresan

"People are outsourcing the judgment and thinking and that's a terrible thing that's happening." - Sairam Sundaresan

"The human touch is more important now than it was ever before." - Sairam Sundaresan

"If you're able to take this stuff out of your mind and put it somewhere else, your thinking becomes much wider and much more advanced." - Roy Castleman

QUICK NAVIGATION FOR BUSY LEADERS

00:00 - Introduction: How a childhood fascination with cameras led to teaching machines to see

03:45 - The Real History of AI: Why the algorithms have existed since the 1940s and what finally made them work

07:20 - The 2% Stat: Why almost nobody is actually using AI properly, and why you're not late

10:15 - The Overwhelm Problem: Even bleeding edge engineers feel this, and here's how to handle it

14:30 - The $10, $100, $1,000 Framework: The mental model that clarifies everything about what to automate

18:45 - Human vs AI: When to hand off and when your judgment is irreplaceable

22:10 - The Sameness Problem: Why AI is flooding the internet with slop and how to stand out

25:00 - Writing as Superpower: Why going analog for your thinking gives you an unfair advantage

27:30 - Conclusion: Where to find Sairam's book and newsletter for ongoing AI clarity

GUEST SPOTLIGHT

Name: Sairam Sundaresan

Bio: Sairam Sundaresan is an Engineering Leader at Valeo, where he manages teams teaching automobiles to understand the world. An alumnus of Intel Labs and Qualcomm, his work in deep learning has led to numerous patents and consumer applications. He's the author of AI for the Rest of Us published by Bloomsbury and creator of the Gradient Ascent newsletter, reaching 100,000 LinkedIn followers and 25,000 weekly readers. He's one of the industry's most trusted voices for making AI accessible to people without technical backgrounds.

Connect with Sairam:

Website: https://newsletter.artofsaience.com

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sairam-sundaresan/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@artofsaience

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/artofsaience/

Book on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/AI-Rest-Us-Illustrated-Introduction/dp/B0F29THNLT/

YOUR NEXT ACTIONS

This Week: Open ChatGPT or Claude on your phone. Take a photo of something in your business, your schedule, your inbox, your whiteboard, and ask it to help you sort tasks into $10, $100, and $1,000 categories. Notice what you've been wasting your expensive time on.

This Month: Identify three $10 tasks you do repeatedly and create simple AI prompts to handle them. Document what happens to your energy and focus when you're not doing low-value work.

This Quarter: Build a system where AI handles customer enquiries up to a certain threshold, then gracefully hands off to you or your team for the complex situations. Watch how your customer experience improves while your time opens up.

EPISODE RESOURCES

Book: AI for the Rest of Us by Sairam Sundaresan (Bloomsbury)

Newsletter: Gradient Ascent at https://newsletter.artofsaience.com

Tools mentioned: ChatGPT, Claude, Claude Code, Anthropic Dispatch, Notion, Obsidian, Supabase

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

READY TO ESCAPE THE TRAP?

Take the Freedom Score Quiz: https://scoreapp.atpbos.com/

Discover how trapped you are in your business and get your personalised roadmap to freedom in under 5 minutes.

Book a Free Strategy Session: https://www.atpbos.com/contact

Let's discuss how to build a business that works WITHOUT you.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

CONNECT WITH YOUR HOST, ROY CASTLEMAN

Roy is the founder of All The Power Limited and creator of Elevate360, a business coaching system for entrepreneurs ready to scale without burnout. As a certified Wim Hof Method Instructor and the UK's first certified BOS UP coach, Roy combines AI automation, wellness practices, and business operating systems to help trapped entrepreneurs reclaim their freedom.

Website: www.atpbos.com

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/roycastleman/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@allthepowerltd

Transcripts

1

::

Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you are in

2

::

the world. I'm here today with might get this wrong.

3

::

Siram, that correct? Yeah. And Siram. Yeah. So

4

::

Siram has been in AI for a lot longer than

5

::

I thought AI was around. And we're gonna have a

6

::

chat today about AI and business and what it's doing

7

::

at the moment, what people are thinking about it. I

8

::

believe you've written a book as well. Yes, that's right.

9

::

And you teach. So interested to hear a little bit

10

::

more about your story. But first, how did you start

11

::

in this reopening into the world of AI? It started

12

::

actually many years ago when my parents took me for

13

::

vacation. Back in that time we had film cameras, so

14

::

you had to be very careful with the pictures that

15

::

you took because there was a finite amount of film.

16

::

It fascinated me that you could press a button and

17

::

capture a moment forever. There was another process of bringing

18

::

that moment to life in the lab. That was my

19

::

first foray with images and image formation. Later on I

20

::

was involved in that. I figured that you could teach

21

::

computers to understand images. That was mind blowing to me.

22

::

I decided that's what I wanted to do for the

23

::

rest of my life. I wanted to teach computers to

24

::

understand the world like we do. That's how I got

25

::

into AI. Since then, there's been one shift after another

26

::

and it's been an amazing journey. You talk about the

27

::

Fujifilm roles, you take the picture and then you put

28

::

it in the camera. So you send it to the

29

::

man, he delivers it, and then he gives you these

30

::

pictures and you're like, oh, okay, that was three years

31

::

ago. Yeah. So you just walk us through a little

32

::

bit of your history and then we'll dive into business.

33

::

Yeah, sure. I pursued my masters in a field called

34

::

computer vision, which is the science of teaching machines to

35

::

see and perceive the world like we do. So your

36

::

self driving cars, or your robots that are grasping things,

37

::

or even your phone that's able to recognize what kind

38

::

of plant you're taking a picture of. All of that

39

::

is computer vision. And I pursued a master's degree in

40

::

that. And that brought me into the subfield region of

41

::

AI. AI is a very blanket term. After my master's,

42

::

I got a job at Qualcomm and I began my

43

::

career in machine learning, which is another subfield of AI

44

::

and computer vision. And over the course of the years,

45

::

I've lived through this modern AI boom, where everything is

46

::

now solvable with AI, apparently, and agents are taking over

47

::

the world and what have you and along the way,

48

::

there's been a common thread, which is that there's always

49

::

a set of people who feel left out of the

50

::

conversation. That happens because they either don't understand the jargon

51

::

that's typical of the field, or they feel like they

52

::

need to have a really strong software background or mathematics

53

::

background. That was something that bothered me as well when

54

::

I was getting in. That's how I began to teach

55

::

and explain things. Eventually, some of the folks through my

56

::

newsletter said, why don't you put this into a book?

57

::

That was the genesis of my book. Most people watching

58

::

this won't even have an idea that AI was around

59

::

15 years ago. AI has been around since the 1940s.

60

::

The reason that it didn't take off back then is

61

::

that there weren't powerful enough computers. There wasn't a sufficient

62

::

volume of data. Once the Internet came around, we had

63

::

this age of big data, which means that you had

64

::

volumes of data on a variety of topics, and then

65

::

you had machines that could do calculations at a rapid

66

::

rate and do it in a scale that was previously

67

::

impossible. And now you had the infrastructure, you had the

68

::

data, and the algorithms have been around for decades. AI

69

::

has been around since the 40s. Explain that, because that

70

::

just doesn't make sense to me. I'm an IT guy.

71

::

I'm not a historian, so I might get the facts

72

::

wrong, but around the 1940s, there were a couple of

73

::

scientists who discovered something called the Perceptron, which is a

74

::

model of how our brain works in a very loose

75

::

fashion. So what they figured out was that if you

76

::

connect these entities together and feed them examples,

77

::

they can figure out how to do things like solve

78

::

logic puzzles or detect or recognize a man or a

79

::

woman. So this has been around for a while, but

80

::

of course, the infrastructure. There's actually a video somewhere on

81

::

the interwebs where you can actually see this machine. The

82

::

interest was immediate, and everyone was excited about, okay, let's

83

::

go all in on AI. But then another group of

84

::

scientists disproved that the Perceptron could actually work on everything.

85

::

And so the interest waned. And then we had these

86

::

spells of AI summers and AI winters, where there'd be

87

::

glimpses of progress and then something that would dampen the

88

::

funding and the spirits eventually. A lot of the formative

89

::

algorithms that AI scientists use today, like back propagation

90

::

or neural networks, large language models, LLMs belong to this

91

::

class of algorithms called neural networks, which are an approximation

92

::

of how the human brain works. In very loose terms,

93

::

this. These have been around many decades. But we never

94

::

had the volume of data. Now imagine having access to

95

::

all of Wikipedia, all of the articles on the Internet,

96

::

millions of images and video, and then being able to

97

::

use these as examples to teach these algorithms to learn

98

::

rules. And you need a lot of infrastructure. Like the

99

::

data centers that they're building today were around in the

100

::

2010s for gaming. And rendering was of the core calculations

101

::

used in these algorithms is something we studied in high

102

::

school. Matrix multiplication and GPUs are fantastic at that. So

103

::

now you had all the ingredients coming together. You had

104

::

very mature algorithms, a large volume of data and the

105

::

machines that could put these two things together. And that

106

::

was the big bang of AI as we know it.

107

::

Amazing. I want to dig into how

108

::

people. There's so many people out there at the moment.

109

::

I saw some graphics where you look at the population

110

::

of the world and the number of people that are

111

::

actually using large language models at the moment. I think

112

::

it's something ridiculous. Less than 2%. It's amazing how it

113

::

feels like the entire world is using AI and yet

114

::

that's such a sobering stat. I think it goes to

115

::

show that a lot of people may not have caught

116

::

on to the amazing things that you can do as

117

::

a result of these models. At the same time, it

118

::

also is interesting that maybe this has been restricted to

119

::

a few areas in the world versus the vast population.

120

::

I guess it's a mix of both. And I think

121

::

Even of that 1.6 or 2%, only a very small

122

::

percentage of them have a paid version. Yeah. And even

123

::

a smaller percent of them are using it with any

124

::

force. My point is that you're not late. You're so

125

::

early at the moment. If you haven't even looked at

126

::

it yet. It's so early in the AI world. We

127

::

are writing the user manual as we go. So it's

128

::

a fantastic time to get on. Whichever is your tool

129

::

of choice or if you're just wondering where to start,

130

::

it's always useful to pick something and try it out,

131

::

play with it, spend time and see what it can

132

::

do. See where you want to dig in a little

133

::

bit more. And that's how you get in. There's no

134

::

curriculum that says do this first. It used to exist

135

::

for people trying to enter the field from a technical

136

::

perspective, but ever since ChatGPT came out, it was sort

137

::

of Pandora's box where everybody now has access to this

138

::

incredible class of models and you can do so many

139

::

things with it. You almost have to unlearn things that

140

::

you have learned like we used to always believe that

141

::

the model can't do this or the model can't do

142

::

that. And oftentimes I myself am very surprised by what

143

::

I have to reconfigure my biases because I have a

144

::

lot of things I think the model can't do and

145

::

I'm surprised when it does. So it's a great time

146

::

to get into the field for sure. And yeah, now

147

::

we have, we've spoken about this low level of people

148

::

that understand it and the capabilities are just doing this.

149

::

Yeah, week on week there's a new thing coming out

150

::

and that I think is the other piece of overwhelm

151

::

that people have got because it's okay, I'm going to

152

::

learn something that's going to change. I think there's a

153

::

different perspective to that. More that that's a

154

::

journey of mastery. You have to go through those four

155

::

stages of the journey of mastery. You have to start

156

::

as the incompetence unknown or whatever the first one is

157

::

and then go through and that only. Yeah, you don't

158

::

need to know anything, but you have to play with

159

::

it and do it. People that I've speak to that

160

::

haven't used it before, I said get your phone, put

161

::

ChatGPT on it, use the free version, go to your

162

::

fridge, take a picture and say, give me a Michelin

163

::

Star recipe that you can talk me through. Yeah. Or

164

::

when you go on holiday, go where you are and

165

::

ask where you should go and see, these are the

166

::

things I like. And it's this human usefulness that really

167

::

is going to come to the surface. Right? Absolutely. And

168

::

I think. Were you referring to unconscious incompetence, conscious incompetence

169

::

and the four items and the level of mastery is

170

::

like unconscious competence or something basically. That's very true. You

171

::

need to start using it. And if it's any consolation,

172

::

people working on the bleeding edge of this also feel

173

::

overwhelmed because everything is changing every day and it's very

174

::

hard to keep up with everything. Oftentimes you might be

175

::

working on something where the next day your neighbor next

176

::

door finishes it and goes on to the next. So

177

::

it's moving at such a rapid pace and it's fine.

178

::

It's totally fine. I think two points I want to

179

::

surface. The first one is just step back and look

180

::

at what is possible now versus what was possible possible

181

::

three years ago or even two years ago. It's mind

182

::

boggling to see the capabilities that have been unlocked. And

183

::

it's important to take that in because you feel like

184

::

there's so many things that I couldn't do previously that

185

::

I can do now. On the bare minimum, I'm already

186

::

ahead of where I was. That's the first bit. The

187

::

second bit is the principles change much slower than the

188

::

tools you need to figure out a grounding principle. Here

189

::

is for the common man. You need to know how

190

::

to converse with these models in a way that gets

191

::

your intent to them as quickly as possible. Because the

192

::

more back and forth you have, the more these models

193

::

begin to bloat and then they forget what was said

194

::

and then they start muddling and your results start falling

195

::

off a cliff. So those principles don't change. Those are

196

::

constant as far as LLMs are concerned. When you operate

197

::

in that kind of a mentality, it's always easier because

198

::

every time a new model comes out, you might have

199

::

to tweak your prompting a little bit so that you

200

::

get the results you used to previous. But it also

201

::

means that this model can do a lot more than

202

::

the previous one could. That's a good thing. You may

203

::

have to prompt less, give it less instructions. It may

204

::

grasp what you're saying a lot easier. There's two sides

205

::

of the coin. I would take it that way versus

206

::

feeling. Oh, here we go again. I have to now

207

::

catch up with this new skill. I feel like as

208

::

these models keep advancing, they're going to become easier and

209

::

easier for us to get things done with. Focus on

210

::

how best you can achieve your outcomes and revisit your

211

::

priors every time the model updates. We talk to business

212

::

owners and I like to take it back down to

213

::

what's the actual problem. There's two things I'll bring up.

214

::

The first thing, if you find out what the problem

215

::

is and you just fix that problem, then you can

216

::

move on to the next thing. The second thing is

217

::

the example. You decide you're going to do some social

218

::

media posting on AI. You realize how easy it is

219

::

to do the LinkedIn post. So suddenly now, in your

220

::

wisdom and in your mindset as an entrepreneur, 15 different

221

::

things you can do. So you try and do all

222

::

of them. So the next thing, you're doing the same

223

::

amount of work without the outcome. You're overwhelmed because you're

224

::

learning all these things and you're losing focus on things.

225

::

Yeah. So that's the one side of it. I think

226

::

there's a real risk of understand the problem and just

227

::

fix the problem and don't get draw. I learned probably

228

::

500 tools in the last three years before I realized

229

::

it's not about the Tools, Right. I see that. I'm

230

::

already silent about that. I'm like, I didn't do that.

231

::

I can do this and I can have all the

232

::

different things that are on there and then it's okay.

233

::

And the other thing is, as you go through this,

234

::

I think it's important to bring this in. If you're

235

::

able to, from a business owner's point of view, you

236

::

understand what the 10x is. What's the one thing that

237

::

you do, you think in the next 12 months or

238

::

24 months that's going to make tech companies stand out?

239

::

I feel like there's two parts to this question. Let

240

::

me first answer it from the entrepreneur's perspective and then

241

::

we'll answer it from the company's perspective. You're absolutely right.

242

::

It can be very addictive to try out all the

243

::

capabilities of a model as soon as it comes out.

244

::

I can do this for my business, I can do

245

::

that for me. But then it's distraction, right? So your

246

::

context is now split and you're spreading yourself very thin.

247

::

A very good entrepreneur friend of mine has this mindset

248

::

that I always think about, which is you can put

249

::

your tasks into three buckets, the $10 tasks, the $100

250

::

task, and the thousand dollar tasks. And AI should be

251

::

helping you completely automate the $10 and the $100 task.

252

::

It should help you brainstorm and be a good sparring

253

::

partner for the thousand dollar task. Anything else? If

254

::

you're spending a lot of time trying to do cool

255

::

stuff on the $10 task, you're already at a loss

256

::

because you're wasting money. And that is a very nice

257

::

mindset for an entrepreneur to have because then you're focusing

258

::

on your business now, coming to the companies and product

259

::

side of things. There's this notion of AI powered, which

260

::

seems to be a buzzword right now. And I feel

261

::

like you should think about whether a product is existing

262

::

in the world because of AI or is enhanced. A

263

::

good example is an email client. You don't need AI

264

::

for an email client. However, it enhances the experience. Auto

265

::

completing your email, summarizing your emails. But at heart, an

266

::

email client is supposed to send and receive messages for

267

::

you. On the other hand, if you remove the language

268

::

model that's powering these things, you'd have a terrible experience.

269

::

And AI is at the core of those things. And

270

::

so the real 10x value comes from two things. One,

271

::

is AI central to your product or service? And if

272

::

it's not, are you wasting your time? Because you should

273

::

not be attaching AI just because everybody else is doing

274

::

it, there should be a clear purpose and a reason

275

::

for it. The trickier bit, if the models get better,

276

::

and they will, does it enhance your product or service

277

::

or replace it? And if the answer is the latter,

278

::

you really need to think about how you want to

279

::

approach your business and product or service. So the ones

280

::

that will 10x are the ones that have AI at

281

::

the core and get enhanced every time a model update

282

::

happens. I believe that you can do

283

::

10 times more work with the same number of people.

284

::

If you're doing 10 times more work with the same

285

::

number of people and you've optimized things, what does that

286

::

work look like? I believe that you should be focusing

287

::

on how do you bring more human into your business?

288

::

So there's the 70% that you can automate, and you

289

::

can automate it step by step. Sops are right, you

290

::

know what you're doing. You, you do that. The customer

291

::

conversations, the salespeople, the interactions, customer service line should stay

292

::

more human because I think the companies that are more

293

::

human are going to be the companies that really stand

294

::

out. Because the companies that just go all in on

295

::

AI, they risk feeling like they're AI. So I feel

296

::

like there's a nuance here and you're touching on something

297

::

very important. And yes, I feel that the human touch

298

::

is more important now than it was ever before. And

299

::

not just because it feels like you're interacting with people

300

::

and that's always a better experience than interacting with a

301

::

machine. But the more important reason is that judgment, taste,

302

::

and just being able to make the decisions from a

303

::

contextual perspective and not a trained biased perspective. What I

304

::

mean by biased is in the context of AI models,

305

::

they're learning rules and patterns from data. And if your

306

::

data has biases baked into it, the model is going

307

::

to learn those. So having a human who also has

308

::

biases, but there's a higher likelihood that you can bring

309

::

in some context and smooth out the rough edges. So

310

::

from that perspective, yes, absolutely, human is important. If you're

311

::

operating at a lot of scale and a lot of

312

::

the queries that come in for customer support are trivial,

313

::

frequently asked questions that can be easily answered instantly without

314

::

them having to wait for hours on the phone, that's

315

::

a good place to inject AI. And then where you

316

::

introduce the human becomes a niche case none of these

317

::

models are able to address. And then they gracefully hand

318

::

it off to a human. And then when you speak

319

::

to a human, then the entire customer journey becomes so

320

::

much more pleasing. Because if a customer is contacting customer

321

::

support, it means they need help with something, they're upset

322

::

about something or they want to when something is coming,

323

::

maybe they're excited. And as business owners, your job is

324

::

to make that experience as frictionless as possible for them.

325

::

So there is a layer where AI makes sense and

326

::

there is a layer where that handoff is necessary. So

327

::

the answer isn't binary in my opinion. It's a gradient.

328

::

100% agree. I think it's which are those tasks that

329

::

just are repetitive and it's just look something up, give

330

::

somebody some information. 100% hand that off to AI. But

331

::

understand when someone starts getting irritated now you need to

332

::

hand it off to human. I've seen the onset of

333

::

all of these call answering services and call calling out

334

::

services. A lot of people, I'll put a few in

335

::

for people and you watch the people that drop off.

336

::

If it's not 100% perfect, you do get a drop

337

::

off. So it's like, okay, is this affecting my business

338

::

in a positive or negative way? And just go from

339

::

there and look, that's going to change, right? I'm working

340

::

with somebody at the moment, interesting guy who's built his

341

::

entire AI platform around human emotion so the AI can

342

::

understand human emotion. That makes that window smaller. But

343

::

then on the other side of that, you're also seeing

344

::

people doing posts and things now actually putting in the

345

::

errors, making it less flowery because now there's all this

346

::

perfect content out on social and that was just AI.

347

::

So in a sense now imperfections are now something that

348

::

we cherish a lot more than stale perfection. So where

349

::

do you see it going? I'm playing with Claude code

350

::

and I'm doing all sorts of other things and just

351

::

trying to keep my focus back in. Where do you

352

::

see it going in the next, even the next six

353

::

months to a year? It's very hard to say because

354

::

we're seeing things, as you said, that are changing almost

355

::

every day. What was previously not possible a week back

356

::

is suddenly possible. Just take, I'll give you an example,

357

::

right Anthropic just released something called dispatch and that allows

358

::

you to run cloud code and cowork on your computer

359

::

from the comfort of your phone. So if you're from

360

::

outside, you can actually just send. It's just insane convenience

361

::

and done at a level of execution and speed, very

362

::

hard to predict. But there are some trends that I'm

363

::

seeing. Some good, some not good. Let's talk about the

364

::

good. The good is that people beginning to build things

365

::

for themselves. Because now programming is resorting to language, whether

366

::

that's English, but whatever be your language. You can now

367

::

speak to a computer and have it build things for

368

::

you, whether that's a application, whether that's a dashboard, what

369

::

have you. A lot of these apps that do monitoring

370

::

or productivity can be built in house and so you'll

371

::

start seeing subscriptions there. Like you, the subscriptions will have

372

::

to earn their worth. That's the first bit. You'll also

373

::

start seeing one person companies become more common where one

374

::

person is just sitting at plot code and then hammering

375

::

away and building a product. And not everybody will succeed

376

::

at this because you still need to have very good

377

::

software engineering principles because of security, privacy, all that kind

378

::

of thing that really matters. You're seeing a huge uptick

379

::

in the number of people building things independently and then

380

::

launching them out in the world. This will accelerate even

381

::

further as these models get better. Because I'm blown away

382

::

by what you can. One shot. But on the not

383

::

so good side, you're seeing the sameness of social media

384

::

posts, of videos, of designs, of websites. Everything is becoming

385

::

same. If you've been working with these tools, you will

386

::

be able to spot things like instantly, ah, this is

387

::

written by AI or this was designed by AI or

388

::

the same art pitch all the time or it's not

389

::

this, it's. That's like the most common tell. And then

390

::

EM dashes. I feel really bad because I used to

391

::

love em dashes before chat gpc. But the point is

392

::

that's the gap that's becoming a problem because now the

393

::

Internet is being flood flooded with slop. So then that

394

::

becomes more of a thing going forward. And it's going

395

::

to accelerate in the next six months because people don't

396

::

have time to write their own posts, they're just going

397

::

to outsource it to a model and then spam all

398

::

social media platforms so that they're top of the mind

399

::

posting every day because the algorithms reward you for being

400

::

present on the platform every day and engaging and so

401

::

on. Negative spiral in my opinion. And the second part

402

::

is people are outsourcing the judgment and thinking and that's

403

::

a terrible thing that's happening. I don't mean just entrepreneurs,

404

::

students, anybody. When you had to turn in an assignment

405

::

in school, you would have to think, read a bunch,

406

::

do a bit of research. Yes, the Internet was around,

407

::

but you didn't have a 24. 7 tutor available on

408

::

the phone to give you the answers, literally. And I

409

::

feel like all of a sudden people have Stopped thinking.

410

::

Okay, Let me ask ChatGPT, let me ask Claude. And

411

::

then they get the dopamine hit of knowing the answer

412

::

but not having earned the knowledge. And so it goes

413

::

away within 10 minutes. But nobody cares that lack of

414

::

critical thinking, lack of judgment and blindly relying on these

415

::

tools is becoming a huge problem from the grassroots. So

416

::

I'll stop here for questions, but these are the trends

417

::

I'm seeing. Yeah, I've finished a book that's been drafted,

418

::

which is how to think outside your brain. The key

419

::

concept is that we don't need to go and learn

420

::

these skills anymore, but you need to stay the thought

421

::

leader. You have to stay every project you do. You

422

::

have to stay the thought leader. You can't just. What's

423

::

my problem? Let me ask the questions now. If it

424

::

takes you. How many times have Chat PT taken me

425

::

down a totally wrong path? I love Court is much

426

::

better at that. But chatgpt, take me down this random

427

::

path and yeah, it's great to be able to learn

428

::

with it, and it really is, but actually learn with

429

::

it and actually understand what can you do inside your

430

::

brain? I've found for myself that I'm able to think

431

::

that much more, and I think that's an entrepreneurial thing,

432

::

is that your thinking becomes much wider and much more

433

::

advanced when you're able to take this stuff out of

434

::

your mind and put it somewhere else. I use Notion

435

::

or Supabase or one of them and I put my

436

::

ideas in and I said, just store them over there.

437

::

Then I don't have to think about them anymore. I

438

::

can come back to it. The way we think with

439

::

AI is different from the way we thought before. That's

440

::

going to come to the surface over the next year.

441

::

Writing is now more important than ever before because I

442

::

actually mean writing things by hand. It's a great time

443

::

to go analog for certain things. If you want to

444

::

sharpen your thinking, writing is the best way to do

445

::

it. If you rely on the computer to do it

446

::

for you, it's a problem because you fall into that

447

::

same trap if you have thoughts. If you're thinking about

448

::

an idea, just putting your thoughts on paper and then

449

::

maybe using a voice transcription to put it into obsidian

450

::

notion, what have you. Your favorite tool. That is a

451

::

very powerful thing to do for two reasons. First, you

452

::

have done the thinking and then the synthesis can be

453

::

done by these models. But the second bit is that

454

::

you can then ask these models to poke holes in

455

::

your thought process. You can ask, okay, what are the

456

::

rabbit holes? You can Go down. What are the contradictions

457

::

to what you have thought? What are the angles that

458

::

you can perceive this from? And that then opens up

459

::

a new world where you can expand your knowledge. So

460

::

I feel like writing is a superpower that everybody has

461

::

to start tapping into. Okay, I'm going to start bringing

462

::

it to a close, but I want to just hear

463

::

a bit more about you and what you're doing. So,

464

::

yeah, obviously you've written a book. What are you doing

465

::

day to day? You teach as well. Tell us a

466

::

bit more about what you do. Sure. Yes. I've written

467

::

a book. It's published at Bloomsbury. It's called AI for

468

::

the Rest of Us. It's an illustrated book where I

469

::

promise you, you can learn AI without having to get

470

::

a PhD. And I teach through my newsletter primarily. It's

471

::

called Gradient Ascent. And what I try to do is

472

::

cover the latest research and developments happening in the AI

473

::

field and then translate it into what actually, what are

474

::

the implications for people in the tech industry and around

475

::

the tech industry. It's read by a wide variety of

476

::

people, including VCs, managers, directors, engineers, students. That's

477

::

my favorite way because I get to learn stuff and

478

::

I get to teach it in my day to day.

479

::

I am an engineering manager and I lead a large

480

::

team of engineers building autonomous driving and parking software. That's

481

::

a really fun place to be in because you get

482

::

to see where reality meets imagination and you get to

483

::

see where things work and where things fail and lots

484

::

of lessons to be learned there. Thank you very much

485

::

for joining us. I'll put your contact details on the

486

::

show notes and wherever we post this and hopefully we

487

::

can chat again soon in six months and maybe our

488

::

AIs will talk to each other. That'll be fun. Thank

489

::

you so much for having me. Thanks, man.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube