In this clarifying episode, Scott Ritzheimer, Founder of Scale Architects, shares why adding systems and processes too early is one of the fastest ways to force yourself into whitewater. If you’ve invested in structure yet still feel stuck, slowed down, or drowning in complexity at a relatively small size, you won’t want to miss it.
You will discover:
- Why heavy systems and processes in the Fun stage slow operators and create artificial complexity
- How to diagnose whether you are overprocessed instead of legitimately over-operated.
- What to do: increase quality operators and filter every system through what helps them succeed
This episode is ideal for for Founders, Owners, and CEOs in stages 3,4,5 of The Founder's Evolution. Not sure which stage you're in? Find out for free in less than 10 minutes at https://www.scalearchitects.com/founders/quiz
Scott Ritzheimer is the founder of Scale Architects and a leading expert on organizational life cycle and founder leadership. He has helped launch nearly twenty thousand businesses and nonprofits and, before turning thirty-five, built and sold his own multimillion-dollar company after a decade of double-digit growth. Today he helps founders and CEOs who have people to lead but are still buried in the daily grind, giving them a clear next step instead of a theory. He is host of the Start Scale Succeed podcast and author of The Founder's Game.
Want to learn more about Scott Ritzheimer's work at Scale Architects? Check out his website at https://www.scalearchitects.com/
Connect with Scott through his LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottritzheimer/
Pre-order a copy of Scott Ritzheimer's book "The Founder’s Game" at https://www.scottritzheimer.com/book/pre-order
Hello, hello, and welcome, welcome once again
Scott Ritzheimer:to the Start Scale and Succeed podcast, the only podcast that
Scott Ritzheimer:grows with you through all seven levels of your journey as a
Scott Ritzheimer:founder. We are now in part three of our "You're Not in
Scott Ritzheimer:Whitewater dot dot dot yet" series, where we're not talking
Scott Ritzheimer:about the levels of the founder's evolution, but instead
Scott Ritzheimer:we're talking about the stages that organizations go through
Scott Ritzheimer:together, and one of those really important stages-one that
Scott Ritzheimer:I spend a lot of time working with my clients in-is the
Scott Ritzheimer:whitewater stage. And a big part of the reason why you might have
Scott Ritzheimer:heard about me or started following this probably had to
Scott Ritzheimer:do with whitewater. You heard me talking about it somewhere. You
Scott Ritzheimer:heard one of our scale architects talk about it
Scott Ritzheimer:somewhere, or you heard Les talk about it. The guy who created
Scott Ritzheimer:the model, the predictable success model. And what we're
Scott Ritzheimer:exploring here in this series is the growing phenomena. I guess
Scott Ritzheimer:you could call it pattern, maybe more appropriate, where I'm
Scott Ritzheimer:seeing more and more and more organizations end up in
Scott Ritzheimer:whitewater prematurely by their own doing, not for the right
Scott Ritzheimer:reasons than ever before, and I think it's a trend that's going
Scott Ritzheimer:to continue. I think it's actually going to accelerate
Scott Ritzheimer:because when you look at it, there's actually three times as
Scott Ritzheimer:many ways, or at least you know three times as many groups of
Scott Ritzheimer:ways. There's an infinite number of ways, but there are three
Scott Ritzheimer:times as many ways to end up in whitewater for the wrong reason
Scott Ritzheimer:as there is to end up in whitewater for the right reason.
Scott Ritzheimer:So in episode one, if you haven't seen that in this little
Scott Ritzheimer:mini series, I'd encourage you to go back to it because I lay
Scott Ritzheimer:some of the foundation. We talk about what the different stages
Scott Ritzheimer:are, just in case you're new to the the predictable success life
Scott Ritzheimer:cycle. We talk about the different leadership styles,
Scott Ritzheimer:which is a really really important part of how
Scott Ritzheimer:organizations end up in whitewater by mistake. We talk
Scott Ritzheimer:about why it matters, like what's the problem with getting
Scott Ritzheimer:into whitewater too early, and we actually built on that a
Scott Ritzheimer:little more in episode two. So, if you want to know more about
Scott Ritzheimer:why getting into whitewater early is a bad thing, check out
Scott Ritzheimer:the second episode in this little series. In this third
Scott Ritzheimer:series, we're going to talk about the second reason why
Scott Ritzheimer:organizations end up in whitewater prematurely. Now,
Scott Ritzheimer:again, the first reason, which we talked about in the previous
Scott Ritzheimer:episode, is that they are overvisioned, and the only right
Scott Ritzheimer:reason is that they are overoperated. So the goal then
Scott Ritzheimer:is to make sure that your organization only ever gets to
Scott Ritzheimer:Whitewater by having too much operator to sustain that
Scott Ritzheimer:success. If you're overvision, or if you're wondering what
Scott Ritzheimer:overvision is, or you think you might be overvisioned, check out
Scott Ritzheimer:the previous episode. In this one, we're going to talk about
Scott Ritzheimer:one of you know maybe the most confusing reasons, and that is
Scott Ritzheimer:that you can end up in whitewater because you are
Scott Ritzheimer:overprocessed. Now, again, if you've been following along in a
Scott Ritzheimer:couple of these episodes, you might think that's insane
Scott Ritzheimer:because, again, if you're familiar with the model at all,
Scott Ritzheimer:you know that what do you have to do when you're in whitewater?
Scott Ritzheimer:You have to add systems and processes. The reason why you're
Scott Ritzheimer:in whitewater is because you don't have enough system and
Scott Ritzheimer:process, and there's too much complexity, and you need system
Scott Ritzheimer:and process to overcome that complexity. Then why in the
Scott Ritzheimer:world would adding system and process put you into whitewater?
Scott Ritzheimer:And if you're in whitewater because you have too much system
Scott Ritzheimer:and complexity, you have too much system and process. Then,
Scott Ritzheimer:how in the world do you get out? Because the only way out, Scott,
Scott Ritzheimer:is to to add system and process. If we have too much, how can we
Scott Ritzheimer:add more and think that it's going to change anything? It
Scott Ritzheimer:won't. It won't. And that's the point. That's the that's the
Scott Ritzheimer:whole problem with ending up here. Now, how does this happen?
Scott Ritzheimer:Let's unwind this a little bit because it's really important to
Scott Ritzheimer:understand how we get here. Because this is again, I think
Scott Ritzheimer:the it could very well become the the most common reason why
Scott Ritzheimer:organizations struggle with whitewater when they shouldn't.
Scott Ritzheimer:I think it's going to pass being overvisioned if it hasn't
Scott Ritzheimer:already. And here's what the problem is, and it's twofold.
Scott Ritzheimer:One, people who've been through whitewater, or people who help
Scott Ritzheimer:people through whitewater, folks who understand the whitewater
Scott Ritzheimer:stage, and have learned the lessons of needing more system
Scott Ritzheimer:and process, when they are asked, "Hey, what do I do to
Scott Ritzheimer:grow? How do I scale? They, because Whitewater is so
Scott Ritzheimer:painful, one of the very first things they're going to say is,
Scott Ritzheimer:"You need to have systems and processes to scale, and that is
Scott Ritzheimer:accurate for somebody who's legitimately in Whitewater who
Scott Ritzheimer:has over-operated. And can no longer sustain fun. The path
Scott Ritzheimer:forward for them is absolutely to add system and process. Now
Scott Ritzheimer:it's a very specific set of systems and processes. It's not
Scott Ritzheimer:just system and process galore, and it's and it's to use those
Scott Ritzheimer:systems and processes in a very specific way, not just to throw
Scott Ritzheimer:them haphazardly at everything, or ask ChatGPT to make you a
Scott Ritzheimer:handbook. That's not going to do anything. Instead, you have to
Scott Ritzheimer:have the right systems. You have to embrace those systems, and
Scott Ritzheimer:you have to you have to build them into the way that you lead.
Scott Ritzheimer:It has to change the way that you lead. Now, how do we end up
Scott Ritzheimer:here prematurely? Well, those folks who recognize, hey, I've
Scott Ritzheimer:been through whitewater. I know what that's like. I know how we
Scott Ritzheimer:got out. It was by adding systems and processes. They tell
Scott Ritzheimer:other people you need systems and processes, but everyone
Scott Ritzheimer:fails to recognize that there's a timing to this, that there's a
Scott Ritzheimer:sequence to it. That when you're a young organization in early
Scott Ritzheimer:struggle, systems and processes aren't going to do anything if
Scott Ritzheimer:you don't even know what you're having to systematize or process
Scott Ritzheimer:in the first place. If you're creating a new product and you
Scott Ritzheimer:don't even know what it is yet, you can't build a system for
Scott Ritzheimer:delivering it. Right now, that's a little extreme, but it's kind
Scott Ritzheimer:of the same thing all across the board in early struggle, and so
Scott Ritzheimer:what I'm getting is there's a right time and place for system
Scott Ritzheimer:and process, and the right time for for system wide, enterprise
Scott Ritzheimer:wide system and process for a systematic way of leading the
Scott Ritzheimer:organization. The time for that is when you get into whitewater
Scott Ritzheimer:again because you've overoperated, but that also
Scott Ritzheimer:means that that time is not before that, because here's the
problem:operators, the folks that you want to drive you
problem:toward Whitewater, if we could say it that way. Let me say it a
better way:operators, the ones who are going to make the most
better way:fun in fun, the ones who are going to let you get the biggest
better way:in fun. The ones who will need the least management from you in
better way:fun. The ones who can create the most success in fun. Those
better way:folks, they don't like systems and processes. Not overly
better way:cumbersome ones. They will deal with as little system and
better way:process is as needed, and probably not a whole lot more,
better way:because one of the things you need to know about operators is
better way:that the motto of a great operator is "Tell me what to do
better way:and don't watch. You can tell me what to do, but I don't want you
better way:hovering over my shoulder telling me how to do it. That's
better way:the way that operators work. Well, what happens when we hear,
better way:oh, you need systems and processes to scale. And instead
better way:of letting our operators have room to breathe and do their
better way:thing and grow the organization their way, we go in and we start
better way:imposing systems and processes on them. What do you think a
better way:great operator is going to do in that circumstance? They're gone,
better way:right? They're gonna. They're either going to ignore the
better way:system and process, and if you're wise enough, you'll
better way:actually let them because you're the one who's wrong, or they
better way:will leave and find somewhere else where they can work without
better way:having someone over their shoulder 24/7. Because operators
better way:hate being micromanaged, and the amount of system and process you
better way:need to get out of Whitewater will leave a lot of operators,
better way:not all of them, but a lot of them, feeling micromanaged.
better way:So operators are this like critical gift for the fun stage,
better way:and we want to set up our system in the fun stage for operators
better way:so that we can get as big as possible, as simple as possible.
better way:And when we add system and process. We actually
better way:artificially add complexity because it's actually more
better way:complicated to do the thing and write it down and follow the
better way:checklist and report to five different people than it is to
better way:do the thing, right? Like that. That's that's indisputable. And
better way:so when we add system and process, here's what's here's
better way:what happens. The the best way I can describe what being over
better way:processed is and why it pushes you to whitewater prematurely is
better way:it's kind of like if you took I I drive a little pickup truck
better way:and if you take even that little pickup truck and you take its
better way:brakes right you take its brakes off that's the dangerous
better way:vehicle. That that's not a pleasant thing to drive because
better way:the moment you've got to stop at an intersection, you're in an
better way:accident. So those brakes are a good thing. Agreed, right? It's
better way:pretty straightforward. Well, what happens when I put those
better way:brakes on my mountain bike? I mean, that that's a good like if
better way:it can stop my truck, it can stop my bike, right? I mean,
better way:like they're gonna be plenty strong enough. If I'm gonna, you
better way:know, pedal faster and go faster, eventually I'm gonna
better way:need that, right? I know it's ridiculous, but but this is
better way:that's the point. This is ridiculous. What happens if you
better way:put the the braking system from my truck onto my mountain bike?
better way:First thing that's going to happen is when I'm trying to
better way:pedal, they're going to get in the way and they're going to
better way:slow me down. That's what systems and processes do to your
better way:operators. They just get in their way and slow them down.
better way:And then what happens? Heaven forbid, where I ever touch the
better way:brake lever and activate that braking system, it's way too
better way:much for the bike. And so the moment I do, boom, straight over
better way:the handlebars, right? Not even a glimmer of hope of avoiding
better way:it. That would be insane. No one would do that. At least I hope
better way:no one would do that. But that's exactly what we do. We think I
better way:got to pedal faster, so I need to get the brakes from something
better way:that's faster, and I need to put them on my vehicle. Another
better way:braking analogy, and this one might help as well. Fun is a
better way:little bit like NASCAR on an oval circuit. The goal is to go
better way:and to go fast. If you're using your brakes on an oval circuit,
better way:you're either coming into the pit lane or avoiding an
better way:accident. Like those are the only two reasons, because the
better way:rest of the time you should be pedal to the metal or close,
better way:because how in the you know how are you gonna like you just
better way:you're you're just going you're just going, and so when you look
better way:at the braking system on a NASCAR vehicle, right? I think
better way:they have 1000 horsepower, something like that. These are
better way:monster engines, super powerful machines with these teeny little
better way:itty bitty brakes, because the brakes would just slow them
better way:down. Well, what happens whenever they go to a street
better way:circuit, or what happens when you go to a Formula One style or
better way:you know indie style street circuit? You need much bigger
better way:brakes. The brakes on a Formula One car, even though it's much
better way:lighter and less powerful, are significantly more powerful the
better way:brakes are than those on a NASCAR vehicle set up for an
better way:oval track. Why? Because you're using brakes a lot. You have to
better way:slow down to speed up. In fact, the fastest way around the track
better way:is to slow down the most at the right points. You actually can
better way:exit a corner faster by slowing down better. Otherwise, you just
better way:end up in the wall. And so, both of these, I want to show you.
better way:Systems and processes are like breaks for your organization.
better way:And when the time comes that you need them, you need them. And
better way:so, when you move to a street circuit, something that has
better way:something other than just left turns, you will very quickly
better way:recognize the need for them. And if you don't, it's pretty
better way:catastrophic.
better way:Which is why people who've been through that experience are so
better way:right to say you have to have systems and processes. But if
better way:you add all that breaking to your team that's just trying to
better way:go in a straight line as fast as they can. The only thing it's
better way:going to do is slow you down, and then throw you into
better way:whitewater prematurely. What's going on here is that folks
better way:who've either been through Whitewater and want to help
better way:others, or folks who see that Whitewater exists-right? You've
better way:read the Predictable Success book. You know that Whitewater's
better way:out there. We have the temptation to try and skip
better way:Whitewater. We think, well, if I can add those systems and
better way:processes now, then I'll never feel the pain of whitewater, and
better way:if you've got anything from this episode, I hope you recognize
better way:that it's that doesn't work. It actually makes whitewater twice
better way:as long, twice as expensive, and twice as hard, because you hit
better way:whitewater with less velocity. And I know I'm throwing a bunch
better way:of metaphors at you, but I really want to land the point,
better way:and I actually had someone who who had a bunch of whitewater
better way:experience who said to me, the safest way to hit whitewater
better way:rapids is to hit them as fast as you can. When you have a big
better way:rapid, you want to get as much momentum going into it as you
better way:possibly can, so that you have the greatest opportunity to
better way:steer and navigate through it. That's what's going on for
better way:organizations. When organizations are overprocessed,
better way:they hit whitewater without the requisite momentum. Why is that
better way:a problem? Well, it's a really big problem because, like we've
better way:mentioned earlier, you have to, if you're going to get through
better way:whitewater that you created on your own by having too much
better way:system and process, you have to simultaneously reduce system and
better way:process, increase operator, usually increase some vision as
better way:well to get through it, and add systems and processes all at the
better way:same time. Like that screws with your mind, and it's really
better way:really hard to do. What happens is more often than not, and I've
better way:helped folks through this before I recognize what was going on.
better way:I've helped folks do this exact thing. I've helped folks to add
better way:more system and process that they need than they needed,
better way:thinking it would help them. And here's what happens every single
better way:time, and and it's. It's unfortunate because most of the
better way:time folks can't even see that they've done this until the end.
better way:Here's how you know, and unfortunately it's at the very
better way:end. But here's how you know if you were overprocessed when you
better way:started dealing with whitewater, it's that when you do the things
better way:that you need to to get out of whitewater, and again they're
better way:very specific. Read the Predictable Success book. We're
better way:not really going to talk about what those are too much in this
better way:series, but there's a ton of great information on it. This
better way:this one right here looks like this: Predictable Success by Les
better way:McEwen. When you do all of those things, you can check all the
better way:boxes. You can have a great org chart, perfect job descriptions,
better way:crystal clear strategy on how you're going to get to
better way:predictable success, and you'll add all of that system and
better way:structure, and it will amount to absolutely nothing. Your
better way:organization won't grow any faster on the other side of it.
better way:It's crazy. When and and that's not because those things don't
better way:work. Because if I take an organization that's
better way:overoperated, and even some that are overvisioned, and I put them
better way:through the that same course, that same set of practices, and
better way:and same set of processes, and same set of structures. Most of
better way:them will something like triple their bottom line. Some of them
better way:will double their revenue in the first year after doing that. The
better way:transformation is unbelievable when you do the right things at
better way:the right time, but if you try and do all of those things early
better way:because you arbitrarily push yourself into whitewater by
better way:putting too much system and process on your operators, it's
better way:not going to work.
better way:So the second big reason why folks end up in whitewater
better way:prematurely, and I think it's going to be the first big reason
better way:very soon, is that they they take all of the talk in our
better way:world now about systems and processes, systems and
better way:processes, systems and processes, and they take those
better way:big heavy braking systems and they stick them on their little
better way:mountain bike and they're pedaling harder than ever and
better way:not getting anywhere. And so, if you're sitting there thinking,
better way:here's probably the best way that you can diagnose this ahead
better way:of time. If you're sitting there thinking, "Hey, we've really
better way:invested in systems and processes, and honestly, I think
better way:they're good systems and processes, but I can't tell a
better way:difference. We're not any more profitable. We're not any. We're
better way:not. Our revenue is not growing like crazy. We're still not able
better way:to scale. If you added all of those, there's a chance that you
better way:added the wrong ones. But there's also a good chance that
better way:you added the right ones at the wrong time. You added them too
better way:soon. Here's another thing, and we talked about this in the
better way:previous episode, but it applies here as well. If you end up
better way:overprocessed and in whitewater, one of the ways to tell that you
better way:did it too soon is to look at how many people you have on your
better way:team, because while it's not perfect, the head count should
better way:give us a decent way of approximating complexity, and if
better way:you're sitting there and you've got great systems and processes,
better way:and there's 15 or 20 of you on the team, and that's bigger than
better way:it's ever been before, but you are drowning in whitewater.
better way:There's you're dropping the ball over the stuff. Stuff's going
better way:wrong. Your systems and processes aren't working. You
better way:probably have too much system and process. You've probably
better way:tried to overcompensate for a lack of competent process. I'm
better way:sorry, operators. A lack of competent or quality operators.
better way:You've tried to compensate for that by adding a bunch of system
better way:and process to something. You've overcooked it, and you still
better way:don't have enough operator to grow. Well, if that's you, what
better way:do you do? And just like if you're overvisioned, what you
better way:have to do is you actually have to go back before you go
better way:forward. It's kind of like you were driving down the road next
better way:to a river, and there was a bunch of rapids over here, and
better way:they're not the ones that you want to be in, but they look
better way:kind of fun. And instead of driving down the road at 60
better way:miles an hour, you all jumped out and got into the rapids, and
better way:you're just bouncing around for no reason at all. Let's get back
better way:on the road. You're going to move a lot faster on the road.
better way:How do we do that? We actually do that by not necessarily just
better way:lessening system and process, because that's kind of an
better way:arbitrary thing. We just like let's just abolish processes.
better way:Instead, what I want you to do is not think so much about
better way:lessening system and process, but about increasing the
better way:operatorness of your organization, and that's going
better way:to happen in two different ways. First, you're going to have to
better way:make sure you have good operators on the team, or go get
better way:some. Then, what you want to do is take your decision making,
better way:your systems, your processes, your products, everything that
better way:you do, and I want you to run it through this filter. What can we
better way:do to this to help our operators succeed even more? How can we
better way:simplify what we're doing so that our operators can? Succeed
better way:even more, and when you use quality operators as the lens,
better way:as the litmus test for whether you need a system or not,
better way:whether you need a process or not, whether you need another
better way:idea or not, when you really focus in on just equipping those
better way:really great operators to go get stuff done, not to be super
better way:strategic, not to be the most innovative, but to go and sell
better way:and deliver and sell and deliver and sell and deliver and sell
better way:and deliver until you have a gigantic organization that's
better way:wonderful in every way. I'm being a little facetious, but
better way:you get the point. Go find the operators and then refine all of
better way:what you do, from how you make decisions to what checklists you
better way:have.
better way:Refine all of that using the lens. How can we make this serve
better way:our operators better? And then listen. They will tell you what
better way:sucks, and they're probably right. At least, if they're a
better way:quality operator and they're complaining about something,
better way:well, sometimes quality operators complain, so we have
better way:to be a little careful with this. But even so, if they're
better way:complaining about something and they're saying, "Hey, that's not
better way:necessary. That's too much. Why are we doing that? It's too
better way:complicated, then at least listen. At least listen, because
better way:they very well may be onto something, and so that's what
better way:happens when we're overprocessed. We end up in
better way:whitewater prematurely. We set ourselves on a path for doing
better way:all the right things and getting none of the right results, and
better way:that's miserable. You don't want to be there. Instead, what we
better way:can do is get out of whitewater, get back on the highway, and get
better way:a lot bigger, a lot more successful, and have a ton of
better way:fun doing it. This I'm realizing that this is coming across a
better way:little negative, but it really shouldn't. I actually get
better way:really, really excited when I come across an organization that
better way:is prematurely in whitewater because I can recognize pretty
better way:quickly they don't actually need to go through whitewater. They
better way:don't need to do the the open heart surgery that is the the
better way:stuff of getting through whitewater to predictable
better way:success. They don't have to do that right now. I can look at an
better way:organization and recognize, hey, they've got another five or 10
better way:years of fun ahead of them. Let's go back there and crush
better way:it. And again, you'll see organizations that can get four
better way:times as large without tipping back into whitewater.
better way:Legitimately, literally seen that, and that could be the same
better way:for you. So, if you're overprocessed, it's important to
better way:recognize that you probably are a big part of putting you there,
better way:you might like process a little bit more than you should, and if
better way:that's the case, then we just need to tap the brakes on the
better way:brakes. We need to we need to chill out on the system and
better way:structure, and we just need to find some good people, and we
better way:need to help manage them well, and that's what's going to help
better way:those of you who are overprocessed and end up ended
better way:up in whitewater because of it to get back to fun and
better way:thoroughly enjoy both being in fun and growing in fun. It can
better way:be very cool. With that, that sets us up for the third most
better way:likely reason or the third wrong way to get into whitewater, and
better way:this is the one that nonprofits struggle with almost all the
better way:time. So, if you're a nonprofit leader in particular, or if
better way:you're a very people-oriented leader, even if you're in the
better way:for-profit world, then you are not going to want to miss the
better way:next episode in this series because this is what happens to
better way:people leaders that causes them to accidentally get into
better way:whitewater way too soon. I'll show you what it is, why it
better way:happens, and what you can do about it. All that in the next
better way:episode. I'll see you there. Hey everyone, Scott Ritzheimer here.
better way:Thank you so much for listening to the Start Scale and Succeed
better way:podcast. I hope this episode gave you exactly what you need
better way:for the level you're in right now. If you want to discover
better way:what level you're in, take our 10-question Founders Evolution
better way:Quiz for free at foundersquiz.com. That's
better way:foundersquiz.com. It'll pinpoint exactly where you are and give
better way:you tailored tips to move forward and reach that next
better way:level in your journey as a founder. If you got something
better way:out of today's episode, don't forget to subscribe, rate, or
better way:review. It helps us reach more founders like you, and let's be
better way:honest, it means a ton to me, my team, and all our incredible
better way:guests. So keep starting, scaling, and succeeding, and
better way:I'll see you in the next episode.