Artwork for podcast Cross Tabs
Mood Swings with Lauren Goldstein
Episode 1914th November 2025 • Cross Tabs • Farrah Bostic
00:00:00 01:33:23

Share Episode

Shownotes

In this episode of Cross Tabs, host Farrah Bostic discusses the intricacies of the current political climate and the emotional toll with guest Lauren Goldstein, author of the 'Mind the Gap' newsletter. The conversation touches on the overwhelming events of the last month, including ICE raids, National Guard actions, and the shutdown. Lauren shares her own struggles with the civic mood and together they explore the concept of thermostatic public opinion and the pitfalls of modern political strategy, including the need for a more authentic and proactive approach. But all is not lost! We discuss the necessity for Democrats to focus on how to not merely win the next election, but to build a better future grounded in authenticity, intentionality, and a shared vision.

Our Guest 

Lauren Goldstein is the lead advocacy pollster for Change Research and holds a PhD from UCLA with ten years of experience as a public opinion researcher and social scientist. She has done extensive research and polling on issues related to racial justice (and injustice), criminal legal reform and police divestment, immigration, and reproductive rights. She is the author of the Mind the Gap newsletter.

Stay in Touch

📬 Subscribe to our newsletter at crosstabspodcast.com for new episodes, insights, and behind-the-scenes content.

📹 Watch video episodes on YouTube @CrosstabsPodcast

💬 Follow us on BlueSky: @crosstabspod.bsky.social and @farrahbostic.bsky.social

📍 Produced by The Difference Engine

Transcripts

Speaker:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Welcome back to Cross Tabs.

2

:

I'm your host, Farrah Bostic.

3

:

I know it's been a minute.

4

:

There are a variety of

reasons for not uploading an

5

:

episode, , in a couple of months.

6

:

They are personal, professional,

uh, home renovation related.

7

:

In fact, on the day I was recording

this conversation, . The electrician was

8

:

here and he was installing new outlets

and switches for this laundry alcove.

9

:

I'm trying to renovate and I

have a kind of weird house.

10

:

So this effort involved him climbing

up into a crawl space over the back of

11

:

my kitchen, and as he climbed back out

again, the plywood panels that cover

12

:

that crawlspace tried to crawl out

with him and on him and all around him.

13

:

So it's been that kind

of chaos ever since.

14

:

I don't know about you, but as the

summer turned to fall, everything

15

:

started to feel very overwhelming.

16

:

Ice CBP and the National Guard

were showing up in places like the

17

:

town of my birth, Portland, Oregon.

18

:

And they were showing up in the small

towns along the Long Island shoreline

19

:

that I live in now, and people whose

salaries are paid by taxpayers.

20

:

Were doing things like deliberately

trying to tear gas, a protestor in a

21

:

frog costume outside an ice facility.

22

:

You know, the ridiculous

can be the sublime.

23

:

It can also be the horrific and the

speed with which events were unfolding,

24

:

including the shutdown, which had

begun only a couple of days before.

25

:

This recording was for me.

26

:

Dizzying, and I'll be straight with you.

27

:

Between the precarity of the non-AI

economy, the uncertainty of the Trump

28

:

trade policies, and then AI itself,

my business has been struggling.

29

:

It feels to me as a qualitative

researcher and a brand strategist that

30

:

the incentives for understanding the truth

of people's experiences have kind of.

31

:

It slipped away and that we are not so

much living in a post-truth world, but

32

:

in an indifferent to the truth world.

33

:

And that means a disengagement from

the kind of authentic data collection

34

:

and interpretation that I do.

35

:

And that seems to be true both

for government and for business.

36

:

This sense of a reckless uncoupling from

truth was on my mind then as it is now.

37

:

And so it was a perfect time in some

respects for Lauren Goldstein, author of

38

:

the Mind the Gap Newsletter on Substack

and a researcher at Change Research.

39

:

And I had a soft launch, an idea we'd

started to cook up over the summer.

40

:

The idea is it would be a monthly

conversation with her about recent

41

:

polling, how that polling is being framed,

and what it tells us about the civic

42

:

mood and the prospects for democracy.

43

:

The first outing of what we're

calling mood swings was informal.

44

:

Lauren had just moved house.

45

:

I was in the throes of

that renovation project.

46

:

Truth be told, it is not over yet, and

we had not quite had the time to create

47

:

an overly formal program for the episode,

and then it took me a month to edit it.

48

:

So here we are a month later.

49

:

In that time, the shutdown

has come and gone.

50

:

Some estimates say that nearly 7

million people in 2,700 locations

51

:

all over the United States

participated in the No Kings protests.

52

:

Democrats won big in off year

races, large and small all over

53

:

the country just last week.

54

:

And at the same time, our

neighbors continue to be

55

:

kidnapped from our neighborhoods.

56

:

Healthcare costs will still balloon for

millions who depend on a CA subsidies, and

57

:

over a million jobs were lost this year.

58

:

So the mood is weird, and it seemed

like as good as any of a way to start

59

:

our conversation by asking Lauren

what her mood was and she said,

60

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Ugh, the mood.

61

:

The mood is tough.

62

:

I feel like I am in a very

strange position sort of

63

:

personally and professionally.

64

:

And that's sort of the, the

interplay of those two when it

65

:

comes to what's happening in, in

our political systems right now.

66

:

Because on the one hand is, it

is sort of my professional role

67

:

and obligation to stay informed.

68

:

, I also think that's just generally

something that we should strive for as,

69

:

you know, citizens and human beings to

sort of stay abreast of what's happening

70

:

and, and not tune out the greater world.

71

:

At the same time, some degree of

tuning out the greater world is the

72

:

only thing that is helping me keep

putting one foot in front of the

73

:

other because the mood is not good.

74

:

The mood is not good.

75

:

I'm not feeling, I'm feeling

very overwhelmed by it all.

76

:

, I'm feeling sort of confused about

how best to continue to operate

77

:

and like continue making progress

at my job and at my work because.

78

:

It feels like there's maybe a

broader reckoning that we all need

79

:

to have and we haven't had it.

80

:

And I don't know if part of that is

hubris on our, parts and how much of it

81

:

is just like we haven't had a moment.

82

:

You know, there's there, it's not

like there's a natural point at

83

:

which we can say, you know, we're

gonna stop building the plane in

84

:

midair and have a conversation about

what the plane should look like.

85

:

So it's not that I necessarily blame us

for not having that deeper reckoning yet,

86

:

but I worry that maybe we're not going

to have it, uh, because it's just one

87

:

crisis after the other and it's easier

to keep doing what we know how to do.

88

:

Um, so that was a lot.

89

:

The mood is overwhelmed.

90

:

The mood is, the mood is

91

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

92

:

I completely hear you.

93

:

It's, it's a sense of where do you

dip your toe in the conversation

94

:

to be part of the conversation.

95

:

What do you wanna add to it?

96

:

What's already been said,

what hasn't already been said?

97

:

, What do we even do now?

98

:

And, and my solution to that problem,

Lauren, was to start gut renovating

99

:

the sort of weird little cubby between

two buttress walls in in my house that

100

:

was the laundry closet, and rebuild

it as a much better laundry closet.

101

:

My answer to these problems, my

way of checking out is to go get a

102

:

crowbar and start ripping out drywall.

103

:

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Love it.

104

:

Maybe I, I might train for a marathon, but

something to, so I need something to do

105

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Exactly.

106

:

Yes.

107

:

No, I think like, , my, my friend Laura

Brownstein, she was like, I like to,

108

:

after a project has closed, like go cook

something that requires a lot of chopping.

109

:

And I was like, exactly the same,

exactly the same instinct as mine.

110

:

Only mine's, , more obviously destructive

and there's nothing delicious at the end.

111

:

There's just, there's just

hopefully, , walls that are in

112

:

fact perpendicular to the floor.

113

:

, That's, that's all I ask,

114

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

That's a huge win.

115

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

is a huge wind.

116

:

I think one of the other things that's,

, interesting to me in this moment

117

:

about how to respond as a person who

cares about this stuff , the kind of

118

:

question of pacing and what's sticking

and what's sliding away and like, it's

119

:

hard even to tell what's sticking.

120

:

, You know, we had about 10 days of

very concentrated discourse around

121

:

political violence in the wake

of the shooting of Charlie Kirk.

122

:

That feels like it's already

kind of old news again.

123

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Mm-hmm.

124

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

And I don't know what, at

125

:

what point that flipped.

126

:

I genuinely don't.

127

:

I'm experiencing a feeling of almost

like being gaslit by the news where it's

128

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Yeah.

129

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

um, the administration is sending

130

:

in troops to every, you know,

every blue city in the country.

131

:

Oh, no, they're not.

132

:

Oh, yes they are.

133

:

No they're not.

134

:

Well, here's the footage of them doing

violence in the suburbs of Chicago.

135

:

Here's footage from Portland where

supposedly we weren't gonna send anybody.

136

:

You know, there have been polls

in the field the last few days

137

:

about like, you know, do you,

do you approve of this or that?

138

:

How, how do you feel about the shutdown?

139

:

How do you feel about, you know,

troops going into American cities?

140

:

And it, it kind of feels a little like,

I don't know how you chase that opinion.

141

:

It seems like it would have to be

super fluid because it's unclear

142

:

even what the facts are on the

ground if you're not on the ground.

143

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

It is so hard.

144

:

, Yeah, I mean that's one of the number one

questions that I get often from clients

145

:

or perspective clients who are looking

to understand public opinion a little

146

:

bit better in response to this moment.

147

:

Because, and that's one of

the number one questions we

148

:

get is like, what is sticking?

149

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Can't even

150

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

tell what's sticking.

151

:

And I almost feel like I, I wonder

if we should abandon that question

152

:

because the reality is like, what does

and doesn't stick is not a few things.

153

:

That's not a, that's not

always a super organic process.

154

:

There's a lot that public opinion

leaders can do to make something

155

:

stick and make it salient.

156

:

So to some degree, there's a little

bit of passivity in that question that

157

:

I would love to see us move beyond and

be a little bit more proactive about.

158

:

What are we going to make?

159

:

Stick what, you know,

what hills do we die on?

160

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

yeah.

161

:

. , riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

So that's part of it.

162

:

And then the other part of it is like,

yes, so to, to some degree, even in an

163

:

organic fashion, some things stick as

in, you know, resonate and people have

164

:

strong opinions about them, or they've

heard more relative to other things

165

:

that are happening in the news that

they've heard comparatively less about.

166

:

But then there's an immediate next thing.

167

:

And so, like, what do we mean by stick?

168

:

Do we mean, you know, people

are gonna care a year from now?

169

:

I, I, I cannot say with any confidence

that I know what that's going to be.

170

:

, A lot of that depends on the first thing,

which is the extent to which public

171

:

opinion leaders decide to make something

salient, decide to incorporate it in

172

:

perpetuity, in their messaging and in

their outlook and in their communication

173

:

with voters and with, with media.

174

:

I completely understand and

relate to that desire to know what

175

:

is breaking through to people.

176

:

I just think we have to be mindful

of the fact that sometimes what

177

:

breaks through is what people try

really hard to make breakthrough.

178

:

And also the shelf life for what's

salient to people right now is

179

:

just like vanishingly short.

180

:

It's like an avocado in a

Manhattan grocery store.

181

:

You know, you have like a

six hour window on that thing

182

:

before it's just gone, you know?

183

:

So I just, I, I just, I wanna

caution that like without.

184

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

inserted effort,

185

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I'm not sure anything sticks as

186

:

long as we want to see it stick.

187

:

That requires strategy and that

requires some proactive attempt.

188

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

I think that's right, especially

189

:

given the pace at which all

sorts of things are happening.

190

:

, There's like a immediate memory

hole of all sorts of things.

191

:

I, I feel like every, every once in a

while there's some reminder of a news

192

:

item from all of six months ago that

I'm like, oh, right, that happened and.

193

:

And so if, if I'm feeling that way and I'm

like glued to my phone and, and I'm bing

194

:

this all the time, I don't even know how

like ordinary people are dealing with.

195

:

In fact, I was talking to a friend of

mine, , who's, who is born and raised

196

:

in this little town that I live in,

and, , she is a massage therapist,

197

:

and so she's like in a dark room, in a

basement of a, of a salon spa, massaging

198

:

people all day long, not on her phone.

199

:

, And, uh, yeah, right, and I asked her

the kinda weekend after, , Charlie

200

:

Kirk was shot, I asked her like,

so just outta curiosity, had you

201

:

ever heard of him before this week?

202

:

And she said, no, I'd never

heard of him before this week.

203

:

The, you know, one of the girls

upstairs, she's on TikTok all

204

:

the time, so she knew who he was.

205

:

, And then she kind of said to me

like, the one thing I did hear

206

:

about recently is this thing about.

207

:

The buckets of kitty litter in

schools and, and kids thinking

208

:

that they're cats and dogs.

209

:

And I was like, wow, that story is

like four and a half, five years old.

210

:

And it finally trickled through the

algorithm to her relatively recently.

211

:

And so a thing that I thought was frankly,

largely a dead story by now is still

212

:

just like floating around out there.

213

:

And if you haven't heard

it, then it's new to you.

214

:

So, , and there's just a lot

of, a lot of that that goes on.

215

:

The one thing I do kind of wonder

about, is the cumulative effect of

216

:

things and the sort of residue of a

vibe that's left even after like the

217

:

specifics of the event have dissipated.

218

:

, And I think like in general.

219

:

I would credit, broadly speaking, the

right in this country for doing a better

220

:

job of like, even if they don't remind you

of the specifics of the thing, you have

221

:

to be deep in the Lord to remember about,

you know, the cost of Bill Clinton's

222

:

haircuts or whatever like that, that stuff

nevertheless sort of leaves a residue

223

:

of all of these people are corrupt and

hypocrites and, you know, they, they

224

:

pretend that they care about poor people,

but really they're, you know, they're,

225

:

they're millionaires and blah, blah, blah.

226

:

Like, there's sort of a,

a vibe that's left humming

227

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Mm-hmm.

228

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

after the, even after the specific

229

:

news is long forgotten or you never

knew it 'cause you weren't even,

230

:

you know, politically conscious.

231

:

Then I think the question then is there

have been over the last few days, even a

232

:

bunch of these like overnight polls about

like, who do you blame for the shutdown?

233

:

Those seem to be a little

bit all over the shop.

234

:

There's also a whole lot of both.

235

:

I blame both parties for the shutdown.

236

:

, I don't know, like, do,

do you have a sense of.

237

:

The mood in the electorate are there?

238

:

Or would you say that I, I feel like

there are many moods, but I'm, I'm

239

:

not sure even how to think, think

about, , I, I feel like this is a

240

:

question a lot of, like TV journal

asks ask What's the mood out there?

241

:

And

242

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Yeah.

243

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

uh, who, yeah.

244

:

Who are you talking to?

245

:

What town are you in?

246

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Well that, but that's exactly how I

247

:

would start answering the question

is like, you know, if, if there's one

248

:

truth about the state of the American

electorate right now, it is that it

249

:

depends on who you're talking about.

250

:

Because there's it.

251

:

We're so divided.

252

:

We're divided in our media ecosystems.

253

:

We're divided in our attention

and our attention span.

254

:

It's not just a partisan divide.

255

:

, It's also paying attention

versus not paying attention.

256

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

I

257

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I think there are plenty of

258

:

people for whom the shutdowns

not even breaking through at all.

259

:

You know?

260

:

I mean, if you are not a government

employee and or you are not close to

261

:

or partnered with, or you know, in

any way closely connected to a federal

262

:

employee and you are not a a, a person

that is particularly tuned to politics,

263

:

there's a very good chance that you

don't know what's happening, let

264

:

alone have a concept of who to blame.

265

:

And I would say the, the people for

whom that applies disproportionately,

266

:

if you're gonna ask them who to

blame, they're gonna say both.

267

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

right?

268

:

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Because, and this is just a, a

269

:

hobby horse of mine that I will

plug at any, at any opportunity.

270

:

I, there's a myth of

the independent voter.

271

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

in

272

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Our discourse, this idea of this like

273

:

principled, informed, intellectually

balanced person, this sort of like

274

:

paragon of intellectual honesty that's

sort of, you know, evaluating both

275

:

parties, seeing the truth for what

it is with some degree of objectivity

276

:

that partisans are incapable of,

and that therefore they have better

277

:

access to real true good information.

278

:

That is a myth.

279

:

Most independents are paying

less attention to politics.

280

:

They are less plugged in on the process.

281

:

They are consuming less information and

are generally less informed than strong

282

:

partisans are about current events and,

and what's taking place on the ground.

283

:

And increasingly, I would say independents

are the people we should be looking to

284

:

when we're trying to see who are the

double haters, the people who hate both

285

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

286

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Again, there's, I think that there's this

287

:

myth that independents see democratic

de democratic, uh, elected officials

288

:

as having particular strengths and

weaknesses, dito for people on the

289

:

Republican side, and they're sort of

saying, well, you know, depending on

290

:

what's most important to me in my life and

what's happening in the country at this

291

:

moment, I'm gonna lean in one direction

or the other based on my evaluation

292

:

of those strengths and weaknesses.

293

:

What I'm seeing in my data, by and large,

is that when I ask questions about which

294

:

party is better at X, Y, Z, whether

that's protecting social security and

295

:

Medicare and Medicaid, the economy, which

I put in quotes because the separate

296

:

rant, but what does that even mean?

297

:

Uh, healthcare, , childcare,

education, you name it.

298

:

Increasingly what I'm seeing

is that independents are saying

299

:

neither party is good at anything.

300

:

Anything Majorities of independence

on every possible policy measure are

301

:

telling me neither party is good at that.

302

:

So it's a long-winded way of circuitously

answering the question of what's

303

:

breaking through about the shutdown.

304

:

I think it just very much depends on

who we're talking about, because there

305

:

is a non-trivial proportion of the

country that is not paying any attention.

306

:

And so if we're looking to understand

better how they are perceiving the

307

:

shutdown, the parties that inattentiveness

combined with, , lack of perceived

308

:

strengths on the part of either parties

is I think a really important finding

309

:

that we need to pay more attention to.

310

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

I completely, completely agree with this.

311

:

This is related to the kind of idea

that, , Mike Potter has written about as

312

:

well of like flat land versus 3D land.

313

:

And like, if you're going to understand

the electorate and what it did, you have

314

:

to include all the people who didn't

vote last time and did vote this time.

315

:

You have to include all the

people who are, have taken the,

316

:

the effort to register to vote.

317

:

And don't like, they're, they

are part of the electorate, even

318

:

if they're not casting a ballot.

319

:

And while their lack of, , a

vote seen in one way means that

320

:

they didn't have a voice in the

outcome, that's not exactly true.

321

:

Like if they had even a gentle preference

between their options and chose not to

322

:

express that preference, that advantage

is one side or the other based on like

323

:

of, of those sides who were able to turn

out their people, who they turned out.

324

:

And I think this is the same

thing I'm seeing on, you know, my,

325

:

my glances up at, , cable news.

326

:

Is this like the net negative, net

positive for either party as like

327

:

a, well, who's winning the day

on the question of the shutdown

328

:

or the economy or immigration or.

329

:

Ice raids or any of the other stuff.

330

:

And it's like looking

for the, the net number.

331

:

But that's just, you know, subtracting

Republican from Democrat or vice versa.

332

:

It's not including this whole

giant gulf of people who are

333

:

going, actually I blame them both.

334

:

And then another 8% who are

like, I don't know, I dunno.

335

:

I don't know.

336

:

I

337

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Yeah.

338

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

got no idea.

339

:

And I think that this is, this is creating

a really kind of unproductive discourse

340

:

because I think to your point, like the,

the decision to make something salient,

341

:

to make something stick, to , push

forward with a little courage on something

342

:

I think gets tampered down by this.

343

:

Like, no, no, it's okay.

344

:

'cause they're, they're

blamed more than we are.

345

:

And so, so we don't have, we'll

just sit back, you know, it's,

346

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Yeah.

347

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

it's the James Carville theory, right?

348

:

We'll just sit back and

let them screw themselves.

349

:

And it's like, are they though,

like, is that what's happening?

350

:

Does public opinion matter when the

administration pretty clearly doesn't

351

:

care what we think, like they're gonna

do what they wanna do regardless.

352

:

Like, I, I was just talking about this

last night with my husband about like.

353

:

The shutdown and then these messages

from Vote and whoever else about like,

354

:

we are going to specifically punish and

fire and defund programs that the left

355

:

likes and that the Blue States wanted.

356

:

And so like specifically, I live in

New York, so obviously like the Hudson

357

:

River Tunnel and the Second Avenue

Subway and, and all of these kinds of

358

:

infrastructure modernization efforts.

359

:

, And I'm old enough to remember when

every other week was infrastructure

360

:

week in the first Trump administration.

361

:

, But apparently we don't like it if

it's, if it would benefit cities

362

:

that are broadly speaking democratic.

363

:

And the thing that's weird about that

is like you would think that would be a

364

:

real concern for frankly both the Trump

administration and the Republican party

365

:

and the Democrats, especially like the

not very popular New York Democrats at

366

:

the moment, , that they would want to like

make some kind of hey out of that because

367

:

hey, a midterm's happening next year.

368

:

There was a bit of a

red shift in New York.

369

:

There was a red shift in New Jersey.

370

:

Like you take away these infrastructure

projects that sure annoy people in the

371

:

short term, but ultimately, you know,

create a lot of jobs and opportunity and

372

:

improve the general, , quality of living

hopefully in, in New York City and places

373

:

like it, like those things ought to be bad

for you politically, unless you just kind

374

:

of, I mean, here's my apocalyptic thought.

375

:

My apocalyptic thought is, unless you

just don't really believe we're gonna

376

:

have free and fair elections next year.

377

:

Well,

378

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

yeah, that's oof.

379

:

There's a lot to break down there.

380

:

Yeah, yeah.

381

:

No, there's a lot to break down there.

382

:

I mean, quite honestly, I'm

not going, I don't wanna do any

383

:

fearmongering, and I'm not necessarily,

I'm not making a prediction.

384

:

I'm gonna express a concern

385

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Because

386

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I feel like I have, I have a lot

387

:

of, I feel like I encounter a lot

of people in my life that ask me

388

:

forecast related questions about

the midterms because of my job.

389

:

In a way that almost frustrates

me, because it conveys this idea

390

:

that we were operating under normal

circumstances, you know, of like, oh,

391

:

well we lost presidential last year.

392

:

, And that incumbent is kind of unpopular.

393

:

So, you know, how do you like our chances?

394

:

I always feel a little bit

overwhelmed and at a loss on how

395

:

to respond to that question because

I don't wanna, like perpetuate

396

:

negativity or scare people, but.

397

:

To be honest with you, my concern is

not that we don't win the midterms,

398

:

my concern is that we win the midterms

and then what happens, January 6th

399

:

might prove to be a, a test run.

400

:

I, I don't know, and that's not a

prediction on my part, but it is a thing I

401

:

worry about and think about all the time.

402

:

So, I mean, given that reality,

this question of like, does

403

:

public opinion data matter?

404

:

I mean, some of my questioning of

that is just coming from like a

405

:

sort of sad place because it's,

it's what I do professionally.

406

:

So quite obviously, I think

it matters tremendously.

407

:

But it is dismaying to say the

least, to feel like the powers

408

:

that be are not as responsive to

it as we would want them to be.

409

:

Right?

410

:

Like in a more functional democracy

we would receive signs and

411

:

signals that that mattered more

to the people who represent us.

412

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yep.

413

:

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

And that's not happening.

414

:

At the same time, I think I really

wanna caution against overinterpreting

415

:

the fact that they are not necessarily

as constrained by that public

416

:

opinion date as we want them to be.

417

:

I don't think that that means that

they're not constrained at all.

418

:

There are still constraints around it.

419

:

I mean, we have seen reporting, for

example, around like a bit of a scramble

420

:

on, on the part of Republicans in

power to try to figure out how to like

421

:

rebrand and better message the one big

beautiful bill because it's unpopular.

422

:

So it, it, it, it's not like

they are utterly unconstrained.

423

:

Public opinion still matters.

424

:

They are not responsive to it in

a way that I think they should

425

:

be, but it doesn't mean that

they're utterly unresponsive.

426

:

I also think like, you know, having

done a lot of polling in deep red

427

:

places, , that are home to a lot of people

that I love and care about, there is

428

:

a lot of value in public opinion data.

429

:

Not just in terms of communicating it to

the powers that be and hoping that they

430

:

do the, the appropriate thing in response,

but it's a way of conveying to other

431

:

people that they have some degree of,

, majority moral, majority power in numbers,

432

:

ability to take collective action.

433

:

I think emphasizing to people that

they're not alone is really important,

434

:

and that's one of the things that I

have tried hard to do professionally

435

:

with my data, but also just personally

in my life since Trump took office

436

:

is sort of correct where I hear it.

437

:

This idea of like, well, I guess

I just don't know this country

438

:

anymore then, because I guess

this is what most people want.

439

:

This is absolutely not

what most people want.

440

:

Most people hate this, and a good

chunk of the people who don't,

441

:

aren't paying any attention.

442

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

443

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

So I just, I, I think it's

444

:

a complicated question.

445

:

I have complicated feelings about it

based on, you know, my desire to have the

446

:

maximum impact through my professional

work and worrying sometimes that my

447

:

ability to do that is diminished.

448

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

with a,

449

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

A wannabe autocrat in power, but

450

:

that is more a, you know, a personal

quandary than it is necessarily

451

:

a, a true sociopolitical reality.

452

:

Public opinion data still matters a lot.

453

:

A lot.

454

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

I, I think this is right.

455

:

I think this is the thing that I keep

kind of, I, I have kind of two tracks

456

:

that I'll, I'll try to, I'll go down one

and I'll come back and go down the other.

457

:

The one is just like, there feels

like, , a, a concerted effort in a

458

:

variety of spheres of public life to,

, diminish the role of voice in general.

459

:

And, you know, my, my kind of tagline

for this is less democracy everywhere.

460

:

This is happening in, , in corporate

boards and, and shareholder arrangements

461

:

where, , I think it's Exxon got a, got

permission from the SEC to basically say,

462

:

shareholders shall vote with the board.

463

:

On major issues.

464

:

Like there is no real exercise of

a vote in a shareholder meeting.

465

:

Now you can't say we

disagree with the board.

466

:

, You have, , a variety of cases now

where they're going to the SEC so

467

:

saying, you know, our shareholders

want to have a vote on a specific issue

468

:

and we don't wanna hold that vote.

469

:

And the SEC is saying, fine, you

don't have to hold that vote.

470

:

Like that's like the, the point

of those things was to kind of

471

:

create some voice for shareholders.

472

:

Otherwise, like the value here is

just like, well, I'm gonna give

473

:

you money and hope I get some back.

474

:

And that's it.

475

:

There's no real say in the direction

of the company, which I suppose

476

:

if you really dislike people like

Carl Icahn or something like that,

477

:

that probably feels great to you.

478

:

But like on the other hand, well then

what is the, like these shares are just.

479

:

Bets, like you don't get to advise

the house on how to run the game.

480

:

And in that case, like it's

just a reduction in voice.

481

:

And this is a reduction in

voice for people who have

482

:

resources to use in this way.

483

:

It's also a reduction in, in voice

for pension plans and public employee

484

:

unions and, and other large groups

of institutional investors who are

485

:

investing on behalf of other people.

486

:

It's a reduction in voice for

whoever is managing your 401k.

487

:

Like you get less of a say in

how business runs in the country.

488

:

You get less of a say if we reduce

access to the cores, we get less of

489

:

a say if we just stop even asking

people what they think about things.

490

:

And I think like the everywhere

that we can preserve people having

491

:

voice and that there is some, you

know, some upholding of democracy.

492

:

In little d democracy in more places,

the, the better off that we would be.

493

:

I mean, even like Starbucks announcing

all of these closures of stores,

494

:

like 60% of the stores they're

gonna close are unionized stores.

495

:

Like, you know, coincidence maybe.

496

:

Uh, but, but more, more likely.

497

:

It's a not so subtle

form of union busting.

498

:

And it's a way to say, we don't

really like employees having a

499

:

collective bargaining agreement, and

so we're gonna, we're just gonna,

500

:

not by closing the stores, they

can't stop us from closing the store.

501

:

And this is a very old strategy

for that sort of thing.

502

:

So, on the one hand,

like, I agree with you.

503

:

We, we should continue to do this so

that there is a place for people to

504

:

have voice, but I think the direction of

flow for who needs to hear that voice.

505

:

I think you nailed something really

important, which is we need to hear each

506

:

other's voices and that like we do need

to know that other people don't know that

507

:

much about something and we do need to

know that they have opinions we don't

508

:

agree with and we do need to know that

there is actually more people like me in

509

:

this red state than I thought there was.

510

:

I think that serves a really important

purpose On the other side of that.

511

:

We just relaunched our newsletter for the

difference engine for my, for my company.

512

:

And, and the kind of theme of it was

leadership because we've been doing

513

:

a lot of work around, , particularly

leadership and nonprofits for a

514

:

project we've been working on.

515

:

But, I wrote the essay at the

beginning of it that drew from a

516

:

talk I gave actually literally like

January,:

517

:

, The theme of the talk was essentially

this, it is possible to make

518

:

good decisions even if they don't

work out the way that you hoped.

519

:

that it's, we, we live in a

world that's a lot about what.

520

:

, Poker players.

521

:

Annie Duke writes about this in her

thinking in Bet's book, but, it's

522

:

called resulting where like if your

strategy for your play is, doesn't

523

:

immediately pay off, you change strategy.

524

:

And this is actually not a great way

to, not a great way to play poker.

525

:

It's not a great way to gamble in general.

526

:

It's also really not a great way

to sort of direct your strategy

527

:

as an organization or a business.

528

:

, You have to play a few hands before

you can really figure out whether

529

:

it's the strategy that's not working

or whether it's something else.

530

:

And so this kind of outcome oriented

decision making that's like, as long

531

:

as it works out the way I hoped or

works out better than I expected,

532

:

then therefore it was a good decision.

533

:

Just isn't always true.

534

:

There are a lot of things that

organizations do that are really bad that

535

:

nevertheless pay off in some way and.

536

:

Oh boy, I just suddenly

conjured, , ASEZ recline.

537

:

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I did too.

538

:

I was thinking, I, I wonder if we

were thinking the exact same thing.

539

:

'cause I love this, this

line of, of thought.

540

:

Um, I was thinking about

the Tasi Coates interview

541

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yes, yes.

542

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

where, you know, he was sort of putting

543

:

him on the spot somewhat repeatedly

about, why did Democrats lose?

544

:

Why did, why are Democrats losing?

545

:

And at one point he sort of answers we,

they're losing because sometimes you lose.

546

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yes, yes.

547

:

Yeah.

548

:

Sometimes you lose , and also like,

the prescription therefore for a

549

:

strategy is very outcome oriented.

550

:

You know, he, he says there's a sort of a

weird jump cut towards the end, , where,

551

:

I don't know, he's going headed in one

direction and all of a sudden we kind of

552

:

cut from Tan Hasi back to Ezra and Ezra

says, I just, I don't want it to be close.

553

:

And yet his sort of prescription for

that is a strategy that, as near as

554

:

I can tell, has been the dominant

strategy of the National Party.

555

:

Since the nineties, which is

to triangulate and to like move

556

:

to the center and concede some

ground and so on and so forth.

557

:

And sure, I guess maybe we have

fewer pro-life democrats in Congress

558

:

that may have something to do

with the preferences of democratic

559

:

voters in Democratic primaries.

560

:

Yay.

561

:

Even in red states.

562

:

, And you know, as people have rightly

pointed out to him, like many of the

563

:

states he listed as ones that maybe we

should run pro-life candidates in these,

564

:

these states are states that have recently

had public referenda about whether or

565

:

not to protect abortion rights either

in their constitutions or by statute.

566

:

And in most of those states, the public

has chosen to protect abortion rights.

567

:

Even the one that he kind

of retreated back to.

568

:

Nebraska recently had some, some

abortion ballot measure where the

569

:

pro-choice side only lost by like two

points, which makes it a 50 50 issue.

570

:

And even in Nebraska, at which

point you have to ask yourself,

571

:

well, how much benefit do I get?

572

:

I think kind of paraphrasing, Tanana,

HASI Coates of kicking people out of the

573

:

tent in order to bring in theoretically

some people from outside of the tent.

574

:

Of course, part of that is assuming that

those people are just outside all tents

575

:

and not actually over in another tent.

576

:

Um, but like, this is a, this is a

satisficing I just want this outcome.

577

:

And so, uh, whatever gets me that outcome.

578

:

And my question is often like,

what are you going to do with

579

:

the power once you have it?

580

:

Like, fine, Mr.

581

:

Policy has admitted that like, politics

is about power, but power to do what?

582

:

And, and this is part of why, like

in in, in this talk and in in the

583

:

newsletter, you know, there is this

question of like, what is it that you

584

:

are trying to do and how do you do that

with integrity and intentionality as

585

:

opposed to flailing around hoping that

it pays off or placing a bunch of bets.

586

:

In a kind of hail Mary sort of a way, or

in in the other direction, being overly

587

:

cautious, like having too much caution

and not enough courage to try something

588

:

that might actually really pay off

bigger than any of the little incremental

589

:

things that you might do along the way.

590

:

And, you know, so again, contrary to

my interests as a researcher, , my

591

:

recommendation was like, actually,

before you pour more data on a

592

:

decision, maybe it's time to take

a step back and say, do we have a

593

:

good process for making decisions?

594

:

Do we reward intentionality and integrity

and a kind of net benefit calculus

595

:

for us as an organization, our state,

our stakeholders, our shareholders,

596

:

our employees, our customers?

597

:

, Does it work out for enough

people for it to be worth it?

598

:

And does it pay off enough for

the business to allow us to do

599

:

other things that we want to do?

600

:

Or is it just this incrementalism?

601

:

Are we retroactively justifying

our decisions because

602

:

hey, that one worked out?

603

:

Or did we have a good

process for doing this stuff?

604

:

And of course, you know, when I gave that

talk to the Bank of Canada, like, it,

605

:

it's not like it never occurred to them.

606

:

, But they don't, one of the things

we talked about in that session was

607

:

like, what would be the necessary

incentive structures for, especially

608

:

in business people to feel like

they were rewarded for making good

609

:

decisions, even if they didn't work out?

610

:

Because most of the time you're

bonused on results, not on.

611

:

Your process.

612

:

And I think the same is

true of elections, right?

613

:

At the end, you either have more votes or

not more votes, and you won or you lost.

614

:

Theoretically there aren't any,

ribbons for participation here.

615

:

But I think that isn't necessarily true.

616

:

I think part of the reason people are

feeling like, well, they're both to

617

:

blame, they both suck, they're both

bad at everything, is there isn't

618

:

even a good process for losing, you

know, you blow a billion dollars in a

619

:

hundred days and you still can't win.

620

:

It starts to feel to people like

maybe you're bad at your job.

621

:

And like that, that also

has its own effects.

622

:

Like people do have to feel like,

, you, yes, lost, fair and square in

623

:

the basic like rules of the game,

but also that you tried and that

624

:

like you did things that were.

625

:

Generally good for the people

that you are representing.

626

:

I mean, look no further than

sports fans who get really upset

627

:

when a team just isn't in it.

628

:

Like they're just not,

they're not there today.

629

:

They're not playing their best game,

they're not making good decisions and like

630

:

you could forgive them if they, you know,

left it all out on the field, as they say.

631

:

But if they just kind of phoned it in,

then the fans get really upset about that.

632

:

And I think the same thing

is happening here as well.

633

:

And so I do kind of also think like, are

we asking the right questions anymore?

634

:

Like if, if we're going to have this

in a situation where the wannabe

635

:

authoritarian isn't that responsive

to public opinion, then should

636

:

we be asking different questions?

637

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Gosh, you said so much

638

:

there that I agree with

639

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

I'm sorry,

640

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

and wanted and wanna dig into.

641

:

No, no, that's a good

642

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

on you.

643

:

I, sorry.

644

:

I

645

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

No, that's such a good thing.

646

:

That's such a good thing.

647

:

I mean, yes, fundamentally, I

think we are, we are frequently

648

:

asking the wrong questions.

649

:

I think the question of whether or

not something is popular is, is one

650

:

that I would love to sort of do away

with in its in its current form.

651

:

And that is not to undermine what

I said before about the fact that

652

:

public opinion matters and that

in a functional democracy, elected

653

:

leaders will be responsive to it.

654

:

It's more that what is popular

is a function of so much effort.

655

:

So much context.

656

:

It is not static, it's not shelf stable.

657

:

Sometimes it is consistent, and

those are issues that we should

658

:

take particularly seriously.

659

:

And I will take a moment to plug the fact

that one of those rare issues is abortion

660

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

661

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

consistently polls in the

662

:

sixties on the mostly illegal

versus mostly legal question.

663

:

And that is a stable finding over decades.

664

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

665

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

But by and large, , and this is true of

666

:

abortion too, the way that you portray an

issue in terms of the way that you word

667

:

the question, the context that you choose

to omit versus provide the framing, the

668

:

high profile messengers who do or don't go

to bat for that issue, all of that deeply

669

:

influences the popularity of an issue.

670

:

And then interacting with that

is what's actually happening

671

:

on that issue in real time.

672

:

So immigration is a great example of that.

673

:

Trump was partially swept into office

based on his ideas around immigration and

674

:

how he integrated those ideas into his

economic message by basically conveying

675

:

to people the reason why you are not

doing well economically or as well as you

676

:

should be doing, is because of immigrants.

677

:

It is because of other people who are

taking something that should be yours.

678

:

They shouldn't be here, they

shouldn't have access to what should

679

:

be yours, and I'm gonna fix all of

that for you so that you prosper.

680

:

There was a real interplay between

his economic message and his

681

:

incredibly xenophobic agenda.

682

:

For some people that

was very, , compelling.

683

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

684

:

But

685

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

If you take a look at what's

686

:

actually happening now,, there is no

connection between the two issues.

687

:

People are not doing any better

financially, and innocent people

688

:

are being disappeared off the

streets, lives are being ruined.

689

:

We are being treated to horrific

visual displays of violence a

690

:

police state, things that are

almost universally unpopular.

691

:

So that's another sort of flaw in the

concept of what's popular or not popular

692

:

in the way that we have been talking about

it and the way that media tends to cover

693

:

it, which is, well, you know, Trump's

agenda on immigration is, was popular.

694

:

Why isn't it popular now?

695

:

The context is completely different.

696

:

And when people are abstractly

responding to a poll question

697

:

about whether they think we should

have higher or lower immigration.

698

:

Has virtually nothing to do with

how they respond to ice disappearing

699

:

innocent people off of the

streets in their neighborhoods.

700

:

They have nothing to do with each other.

701

:

And that has everything to do

with the fact that we process

702

:

information in some biased ways.

703

:

We exceptionalize specific people and

we other, under certain circumstances.

704

:

It, it's, it is just so much more

complicated than this idea of, you

705

:

know, I think immigration is a,

is a, just a flaw in the system.

706

:

And I voted for the guy who was

going to course correct it, and

707

:

I sort of give him free reign

to go about that as he sees fit.

708

:

That is not how it works.

709

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

so

710

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

That public opinion can be thermostatic,

711

:

it can be responsive to who's in power,

but it can also just fundamentally shift

712

:

as a function of context and framing.

713

:

So yeah, I would say in some ways we're

definitely asking the wrong questions.

714

:

One of those wrong questions, I

would say is, is something popular?

715

:

I think that's just the wrong frame.

716

:

It's not that we shouldn't

care about how things pull.

717

:

Or how the public perceives things.

718

:

We absolutely should now more than ever.

719

:

But that's not the right question to ask

if that's what you're trying to learn.

720

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

yeah, so I wound up getting into a bit of

721

:

a back and forth yesterday with Laha Jain.

722

:

. Who has come on the show, , and

you know, is a perfectly nice guy.

723

:

, But he was posting about a piece

that Jerusalem Duns had written

724

:

for the argument about, , that

I will un charitably right now.

725

:

, Characterize as get in ladies,

it's time to be optimistic about

726

:

progress as if like we are not,

and also like op optimism really.

727

:

Have you looked out a window lately?

728

:

, the piece was sort of looking

at, it, highlighted a couple

729

:

of specific questions.

730

:

One was about, . Self-driving cars.

731

:

One was about nuclear power and it

demonstrated this gender gap in approval

732

:

of either of these technologies.

733

:

And now neither one of them

were the same question.

734

:

One was like, would you, ban

or permit self-driving cars?

735

:

And another one was just sort of like

how, you know, do, do you approve

736

:

of or disapprove of nuclear power?

737

:

And there, there is demonstrably

a gender gap between those things.

738

:

There are also, interestingly

enough regional variations on

739

:

those things and a variety of

other variations on those things.

740

:

And my argument was not actually

about the poll question results.

741

:

My argument was like the greater

characterization of this was that if

742

:

women are more likely to want to regulate

these technologies or are more concerned

743

:

about the safety of these things or more

kind of skeptical of them, that therefore

744

:

in Desus is kind of construction of

this, they are skeptical of progress.

745

:

Yeah.

746

:

And like that is very odd to me.

747

:

I just did a 125 person study where we

interviewed all of these people about

748

:

how they use AI mode in Google search.

749

:

And like, here's an interesting finding.

750

:

Middle-aged women love them.

751

:

Some voice activated AI mode search.

752

:

They love talking to the Google app.

753

:

And like, so tell me, are they, are they

techno pessimists or techno optimists?

754

:

, You know, we saw this years ago in like

the video game industry where it was

755

:

like, well, men are gamers except that

when you look at casual games, mobile

756

:

games, , mostly women are playing those.

757

:

And actually quite a few women are

playing the other kinds of games too.

758

:

It's just like anytime it's like 60

40, then it all, it only men do a

759

:

thing, um, every time it's like 55, 45.

760

:

Well, it's a male audience and it's like

you are just ignoring a whole lot of

761

:

money and customers when you do that.

762

:

But it's also just a poor characterization

of things and so, you know, part of what

763

:

I've responded to is like, first of all,

you are asserting that technology has

764

:

been a net good for women's productivity,

free time, happiness, et cetera.

765

:

When there is actually like whole books

written about how that is not true, that

766

:

the advent of household technologies have

freed you up from the drudgery of doing

767

:

laundry by hand and created new drudgery

for you to fill that time with because it

768

:

shifts the goalposts on what cleanliness

is and it enables you to own more

769

:

clothes that then have to be wandered.

770

:

And so you're doing more loads

of laundry than you ever did

771

:

when you had to do them by hand.

772

:

Like there's just like genuine

documented stuff about.

773

:

How that didn't have the effect

that it was supposed to have.

774

:

It also hasn't closed the pay gap.

775

:

It hasn't reduced the work week.

776

:

It hasn't made, uh, family leave paid

or more culturally acceptable at work.

777

:

We have all of these tools for

remote work, but it's return to

778

:

office or else, and like, so come on.

779

:

Has it, has it significantly improved

our lives and now, like there's a lot

780

:

of technology coming online that's

gonna threaten lots of people's jobs.

781

:

I mean, some very large proportion of men

in this country make their living driving.

782

:

And if you get to self-driving

cars, self-driving trucks, like

783

:

they're going to be out of work.

784

:

There are a lot of jobs that are

administrative and assistive and, , you

785

:

know, very much about like, writing

things that aren't really that important.

786

:

, And those jobs are gonna

go to AI in the short term.

787

:

They will swing back because the

AI's not very good at doing them.

788

:

But those are women's jobs a lot

of the time and they're entry

789

:

level jobs a lot of the time.

790

:

So I, I, you know, even if I wanted

to accept your framing as true that

791

:

women are not as techno optimistic as

men are, , there might be some good

792

:

cultural context for that that doesn't

have to do specifically with, like,

793

:

it's not caused by being a woman.

794

:

Exactly.

795

:

It's caused by the, the kind of

cultural construction of being a woman.

796

:

And so it's not like there's

some biological fact about women

797

:

that makes them techno skeptical.

798

:

, It's also just not true.

799

:

Women adopt technology.

800

:

They don't adopt all

the same technologies.

801

:

The other side of this, of course,

is like, why are men optimistic

802

:

about self-driving cars and space

and gene editing and whatever?

803

:

Like, because they're investing in it.

804

:

Because they, they use their

STEMI checks to buy crypto.

805

:

And if a young mother, you know,

used her STEMI check to buy

806

:

crypto, she'd be frowned upon.

807

:

She should have used that to pay

down a credit card or to put food

808

:

on the table or to buy her kids

a pair of shoes, or pay rent.

809

:

Like that's what that was for.

810

:

And it's just very different.

811

:

Like these things are very socially

constructed, uh, constructed differently.

812

:

But even this makes me think about

like, what is the, what are people

813

:

bringing to that question about

popular or approval or, I like it.

814

:

I don't like it like.

815

:

Like it In what way?

816

:

Like it, 'cause I, I like using it or like

it, because I think it's generally good

817

:

for society or I think it's good for my

community or, , I'm like, I don't like it.

818

:

'cause I'm, I mean, I have yet

to sit in a self-driving car.

819

:

There aren't any out here where

I live and they're not really

820

:

available yet in New York City.

821

:

They're coming online, but, I haven't

ridden in a Waymo or whatever they are.

822

:

So I don't have this experience.

823

:

I'm still a little skied by it.

824

:

Not sure I like the idea very much.

825

:

Other people seem to love it, whatever.

826

:

But like what are you bringing to

it when you answer that question?

827

:

And this came up literally right

before we got on here today.

828

:

, Matt Novak was writing about these

people who have been losing ridiculous

829

:

amounts of money to crypto scams that

they think are coming from Elon Musk.

830

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

God.

831

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

So like a Florida guy lost $41,000

832

:

to his crypto scam that used Elon

Musk's face because he thought.

833

:

He was, he thought he was giving

money to his hero, Elon Musk.

834

:

There's also a story about a woman

in her seventies who lost $65,000

835

:

and, , she understood that she had

been scammed, but she thought she had

836

:

been scammed by the real Elon Musk.

837

:

, So didn't even understand that it wasn't,

and it wasn't any, it's a fake Bitcoin.

838

:

And she writes in this, in this comment

like, I'm begging you pretty all caps,

839

:

I'm begging you pretty pleased to help

me recover the money that he scammed me.

840

:

He is a billionaire so he can

afford to give it back to me.

841

:

I didn't mind when he made me fall in love

with him, but the money is very important

842

:

to me as I need it for my dental implant

surgery like this to me is both, and I,

843

:

you know, I reposted this and said this,

like, as a researcher, this is terrible.

844

:

And it's wonderful because it really

shows like people have some idea of

845

:

how things are supposed to work that

they bring to these interactions and.

846

:

It doesn't occur to them

that they're being scammed.

847

:

And then if they've clock that

they've been scammed, it doesn't

848

:

occur to them that they're being

scammed by a, you know, some, somebody

849

:

that's not who they say they are.

850

:

Right.

851

:

And then it doesn't occur

to them that they can't have

852

:

the money returned to them.

853

:

Like he's a billionaire.

854

:

He can afford to give it back to me.

855

:

She has a model in her mind

of how this ought to work, and

856

:

none of it worked that way.

857

:

And like if you don't understand the

model they're bringing into this question,

858

:

then, then I don't know, like what

we're even measuring here are, are men

859

:

optimistic about these technologies?

860

:

'cause they think, they'll get rich

off of them, or because they're just

861

:

generally like on board with cool stuff.

862

:

, and then what is the connection

between liking a particular technology

863

:

and being optimistic about progress?

864

:

Like those are totally separate

questions and concepts, and yet

865

:

we're conflating all of them.

866

:

We really need more understanding

people's mental models about things.

867

:

And I'm glad that you brought up the

immigration stuff because, the wonderful

868

:

people over the bulwark, , have been doing

live events lately where Sarah Longwell

869

:

talks about like, look, it is broadly that

the immigration stuff, mass deportations

870

:

broadly popular in the country.

871

:

And I'm like, except they're not.

872

:

Like they kind of are in the

abstract and not in the concrete.

873

:

Which of course made me think of,

you know, work you've done on, on

874

:

abortion and other things where like

when you actually dig underneath

875

:

like specific circumstances, all of

a sudden it's like, oh no, no, it

876

:

should be legal there, it should be

legal here, it should be legal here.

877

:

Like all of a sudden it's, it's, it

should be legal in most instances,

878

:

in which case it should be legal.

879

:

And then when people actually have

the right taken away, suddenly

880

:

people are like on second thought.

881

:

I am in favor of abortion rights and,

but like in the abstract, it's icky and

882

:

the abstract, it runs contrary to my

moral ideals or my religious beliefs.

883

:

And so when you're just asking

me in the abstract, if it doesn't

884

:

really feel under threat to me,

then I'll tell you I don't like it.

885

:

And so this popularity thing is,

I think you're absolutely right.

886

:

It's like if there was a question

I would slingshot into the sun,

887

:

it would probably be that one.

888

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Yeah.

889

:

Yeah.

890

:

I mean, and it's not to do away with the

concept of caring about what people think.

891

:

That's, that's not at

all what I'm trying to

892

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

893

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

It's just to your, to your point

894

:

and your, your perfect example.

895

:

Sometimes that question does a

really poor job of answering the

896

:

question we actually care about.

897

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

898

:

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I, and I'm reminded again of, of something

899

:

that Taana Hassi Coates mentioned in

that EZ Recline interview towards the

900

:

end, where he sort of, , made reference

to a friend of his, , who said something

901

:

to the effect of like, you know.

902

:

Throughout American history.

903

:

If we, if we situate ourselves where

we are right now, this is the best

904

:

group of white people we have ever had.

905

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yes.

906

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Like, this is the best we've ever done.

907

:

This is the best it's ever been.

908

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yep.

909

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Of course that is not to suggest

910

:

that it can't be meaningfully

better, but when we situate it in

911

:

history, it's the best we've had.

912

:

That was what kept coming to mind when you

were talking about this idea of optimism

913

:

because it's, it's a perfect example

of what we miss when we ask a surface

914

:

level question in a poll and we don't

follow up and we don't dig any deeper

915

:

and we don't try to understand the why.

916

:

Is it, it just reminds me of that

question of, you know, are, are

917

:

things going in the right direction

or are they off on the wrong track?

918

:

Well, what does that mean?

919

:

What do we really mean when we ask

that, you know, it are white people

920

:

in this country as situated in our

long history, going in the right

921

:

direction or off on the wrong track?

922

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

923

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I, I probably going in the right

924

:

direction all things considered,

that doesn't mean it's good enough.

925

:

That doesn't necessarily mean that I would

say that I'm super optimistic about what

926

:

the next five or 10 years look like, but

if you're asking me to think about it in

927

:

the long arc of history, better than it's

ever been before, that, that probably

928

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yep.

929

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

And so I would say going

930

:

in the right direction.

931

:

, But, you know, I think it, it's sort of

in, I think it's incumbent on everybody

932

:

who does public opinion research of any

kind, to sort of sometimes pause and

933

:

evaluate the questions that we ask and

ask ourselves how we would answer them.

934

:

Because sometimes I think I've

written a question that is, you know,

935

:

straightforward and easy to answer, or

I'm just, I use the right direction,

936

:

wrong track question, don't get me wrong.

937

:

, It has utility.

938

:

It just requires a follow up.

939

:

And sometimes I think about what kind of

follow up question I would need or, or

940

:

the, into which I might write a question

and think that I'm, I've covered all

941

:

my bases, and then I look at it and I

think, well, if I wanted to answer this

942

:

question, I feel like I would want a text

box, because none of this quite captures

943

:

my sort of constellation of snowflakes

944

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

945

:

And I

946

:

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

terms of how I would answer this.

947

:

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Totally, and I, and I think that this

948

:

is one of the, one of the challenges, I

mean, obviously I, look, I'm always gonna

949

:

come to this conversation with the bias

of the qualitative researcher who gets to

950

:

spend 45 minutes talking to people about

their favorite soda flavors or whatever.

951

:

But like, my frustration with the

thing in the argument was you're

952

:

taking two questions that yes.

953

:

Demonstrate some sort of gender gap.

954

:

You are extrapolating from that, a

universe of meaning that is just not

955

:

evident in the evidence you're presenting.

956

:

So, no, actually I'm not, I am not

disagreeing with you about what the

957

:

data is and even what it nominally says.

958

:

But I am, I am disagreeing

with how you interpret it.

959

:

I, I think like you are leaving a

whole lot of stuff off to the side

960

:

that can't be left off to the side.

961

:

And when we ask those kinds of

questions, , I think we're just leaving

962

:

a whole lot of things off to the side.

963

:

And even like.

964

:

You know, the discourse around what

were people so upset about in:

965

:

The economy was doing great, inflation

was slowing jobs, numbers were,

966

:

you know, looked like they were

really good and you know, sure.

967

:

Except that I will just tell you that

like lots of people I talked to last year

968

:

felt like the job market was terrible.

969

:

Our business was as

down as it's ever been.

970

:

And like it was a slog

getting through last year.

971

:

It has been a slog

getting through this year.

972

:

I was talking to the electrician earlier

today and he said the same thing.

973

:

He was like, across the trades out

here, the spring and summer were really

974

:

slow to the point where people were

freaking out and then like August

975

:

1st hit and all of a sudden everybody

wanted to have something fixed.

976

:

And like, why?

977

:

I don't know.

978

:

But we had the exact same

pattern in our business.

979

:

And so if you're asking me.

980

:

How's the economy?

981

:

Like we, you know, we still own our house.

982

:

We still could afford all of our bills.

983

:

You know, my, my husband is still

gainfully employed in a, in a actual job.

984

:

And, , and I'm still working,

but it doesn't feel great.

985

:

Like, it, it, it doesn't feel great.

986

:

And so, you know, do you want to now

TT at me and say, well, you're wrong

987

:

because look at all these economic data,

or do we wanna admit that like we are

988

:

living in a country that increasingly

has, what my friend Ferris Jacob calls

989

:

me is diverging economic destinies that

like if you were born rich or you managed

990

:

to gamble and win, then you are in a

different group of people then if you

991

:

work for a living in any kind of job.

992

:

And I don't even mean like blue

collar jobs, I just mean people

993

:

who are dependent on paychecks or

money for work in order to live.

994

:

You're living in a different

universe than the people who.

995

:

You know, struck big on crypto

or we're born with a trust fund.

996

:

And so like all of these

things are just not the same.

997

:

Which makes me wonder actually, 'cause

you also wanted to talk about the kind of

998

:

subject of Thermostatic public opinion,

which is one of my, , favorite topics too.

999

:

But I wonder like, are we even really

thinking about that the right way?

:

00:50:16,798 --> 00:50:19,588

'cause I think like the kind of pop

culture construction of thermostatic,

:

00:50:19,638 --> 00:50:22,728

, public opinion, to the extent

there's a pop culture construction of

:

00:50:22,728 --> 00:50:26,388

thermostatic public opinion, but, you

know, amongst the commonary is like,

:

00:50:26,598 --> 00:50:29,578

well, , you know, the Republicans won

this time, so next time the Democrats

:

00:50:29,578 --> 00:50:31,738

will win and then the Republicans will

win and then the Democrats will win.

:

00:50:31,738 --> 00:50:33,118

And we're just gonna kind

of go back and forth.

:

00:50:33,478 --> 00:50:35,998

But I, but like, hmm.

:

00:50:36,298 --> 00:50:41,578

Is it more like you place a bet

you, you win or you lose and now

:

00:50:41,578 --> 00:50:44,758

you feel differently about the bet

you placed in the first instance?

:

00:50:45,148 --> 00:50:46,888

, Like, is it just missing this like.

:

00:50:47,288 --> 00:50:50,198

There they're responding to

something other than just sort

:

00:50:50,198 --> 00:50:52,118

of a general dissatisfaction.

:

00:50:52,688 --> 00:50:55,958

I don't know, I, is it even right

to call it thermostatic or what

:

00:50:55,958 --> 00:50:57,218

is the thermostat measuring?

:

00:50:57,618 --> 00:50:58,008

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Right.

:

00:50:58,503 --> 00:50:58,923

I mean,

:

00:50:59,323 --> 00:50:59,673

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

think

:

00:51:00,108 --> 00:51:01,188

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

a few things.

:

00:51:01,588 --> 00:51:07,625

I'm just generally never of the opinion

that passivity is, , the right strategy

:

00:51:07,715 --> 00:51:09,575

or the most logical explanation.

:

00:51:10,235 --> 00:51:14,445

So I would not want folks to interpret

thermostatic public opinion as a

:

00:51:14,445 --> 00:51:19,615

concept to mean that there's something

deterministic about the idea that, well,

:

00:51:19,645 --> 00:51:22,855

that party won last time, so this party's

gonna win this time, and therefore I don't

:

00:51:22,855 --> 00:51:25,105

need to do anything or change anything.

:

00:51:25,375 --> 00:51:29,455

I just need to sort of let the public

view how this is going and allow

:

00:51:29,725 --> 00:51:31,105

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

The James Carville case?

:

00:51:31,105 --> 00:51:31,525

Yes.

:

00:51:31,530 --> 00:51:31,645

The,

:

00:51:31,675 --> 00:51:31,915

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

right?

:

00:51:31,915 --> 00:51:35,305

I need to just allow the people in

power to like, make their own bed.

:

00:51:35,335 --> 00:51:35,515

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

yeah.

:

00:51:35,515 --> 00:51:35,755

Play

:

00:51:35,785 --> 00:51:37,375

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

then I can just, you know, yeah, I'll,

:

00:51:37,435 --> 00:51:42,605

I'll just, you know, I'll, I'll ride

the, the inevitable wave back into

:

00:51:42,605 --> 00:51:44,675

power when people see how this is going.

:

00:51:45,425 --> 00:51:49,365

I don't subscribe to that at all, and I, I

don't think that that's what's happening.

:

00:51:49,765 --> 00:51:50,065

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

You know,

:

00:51:50,270 --> 00:51:52,430

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I think a lot of what we might

:

00:51:52,430 --> 00:51:55,580

refer to as thermostatic public

opinion is just a, a context

:

00:51:55,835 --> 00:51:56,255

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

:

00:51:56,720 --> 00:51:58,190

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

You know, what was the context

:

00:51:58,190 --> 00:52:01,520

for evaluating immigration in

:

:

00:52:01,550 --> 00:52:02,870

It's a fundamentally different landscape.

:

00:52:03,270 --> 00:52:05,340

It just, it means something different.

:

00:52:05,610 --> 00:52:11,140

So it's not, I don't think we're

necessarily observing that There's a

:

00:52:11,140 --> 00:52:13,960

ton of like, attitude change happening.

:

00:52:14,125 --> 00:52:17,215

I think it's more,

well, I don't like this.

:

00:52:17,400 --> 00:52:17,820

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

:

00:52:18,205 --> 00:52:19,135

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I had a different idea

:

00:52:19,135 --> 00:52:20,125

of how it was going to be

:

00:52:20,245 --> 00:52:20,485

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yep.

:

00:52:20,885 --> 00:52:22,085

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

and I don't like how it's going.

:

00:52:22,531 --> 00:52:25,771

, we have to appreciate a lot of nuance

and we have to generally be a lot more

:

00:52:25,771 --> 00:52:29,911

proactive than to just sort of passively

say public opinion will self-correct.

:

00:52:30,311 --> 00:52:35,741

That said, I do think in a hyper

divided, hyper hyperpolarized climate,

:

00:52:36,141 --> 00:52:40,401

I think there is a little bit of

inevitability to the idea of, you know.

:

00:52:41,061 --> 00:52:42,531

One party can only stay in power for so

:

00:52:42,946 --> 00:52:43,366

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

00:52:43,611 --> 00:52:45,321

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I worry that that is the case.

:

00:52:45,391 --> 00:52:50,821

, I mean, I think we have a fairly

unusual streak happening now

:

00:52:50,881 --> 00:52:53,941

of like one term presidencies.

:

00:52:54,031 --> 00:52:54,121

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

:

00:52:54,511 --> 00:52:56,161

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

historically most presidents I

:

00:52:56,191 --> 00:52:57,721

think have have won second terms.

:

00:52:57,871 --> 00:52:58,171

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

yeah.

:

00:52:58,511 --> 00:53:00,191

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

It's too early to know how, how

:

00:53:00,191 --> 00:53:01,511

much this is a trend or blip.

:

00:53:01,931 --> 00:53:06,251

But I do wonder and worry that one of

the consequences of a highly polarized

:

00:53:06,251 --> 00:53:09,491

electorate is that we're just gonna

bounce back and forth repeatedly

:

00:53:09,971 --> 00:53:12,991

without, , much long-term consistency.

:

00:53:13,291 --> 00:53:17,701

I should qualify that by saying, it's

not like I want to give the people

:

00:53:17,701 --> 00:53:20,401

currently in power, the old college,

try and say, give 'em two terms.

:

00:53:20,401 --> 00:53:21,241

It's gonna be fine.

:

00:53:21,241 --> 00:53:22,081

Like, of course I am

:

00:53:22,481 --> 00:53:23,151

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Completely.

:

00:53:23,181 --> 00:53:24,531

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

pot committed on making this.

:

00:53:25,311 --> 00:53:29,451

A, a one term Republican, , situation,

and then ideally taking back power

:

00:53:29,451 --> 00:53:30,501

for as long as we can keep it.

:

00:53:30,501 --> 00:53:33,471

But I, I worry that one of the byproducts

of polarization is that that's gonna

:

00:53:33,471 --> 00:53:35,271

be harder and harder and harder to do.

:

00:53:35,436 --> 00:53:35,796

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

yeah.

:

00:53:36,086 --> 00:53:38,666

That was another interesting

exchange between Asana.

:

00:53:38,666 --> 00:53:40,146

Hasse was like that.

:

00:53:40,146 --> 00:53:41,796

I don't, I don't want it to be close.

:

00:53:41,916 --> 00:53:45,576

And so honestly was just like, I

think it's gonna be close for a while.

:

00:53:45,906 --> 00:53:50,406

The reality of the polarization is

that it's not like, , well, at the

:

00:53:50,406 --> 00:53:55,036

moment it is not like there is, uh, I

mean, this is part of what's, what's

:

00:53:55,036 --> 00:53:59,836

fascinating is that there's a lot of

issues that are actually like 60% issues.

:

00:53:59,956 --> 00:54:06,326

And some of them, and some are more than

that, but some of those issues are not.

:

00:54:06,326 --> 00:54:07,736

When you then look at the like.

:

00:54:08,426 --> 00:54:11,356

Party id, , are not polarized on party id.

:

00:54:11,626 --> 00:54:15,136

A lot of them though are, and so you get

this sort of like, well, 60% of Americans

:

00:54:15,136 --> 00:54:18,406

agree about this, and it's because like

90% of Democrats are on that side and

:

00:54:18,436 --> 00:54:20,656

10% of Republicans are on that side.

:

00:54:20,656 --> 00:54:22,096

And so that gets you to your 60%.

:

00:54:22,876 --> 00:54:27,693

, But as long as that divide is so

clearly demarcated, like whenever

:

00:54:27,693 --> 00:54:31,773

something becomes coded as right or

left, then people who identify as

:

00:54:31,773 --> 00:54:33,693

right or left know what side to take.

:

00:54:33,998 --> 00:54:34,348

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Right.

:

00:54:34,693 --> 00:54:36,103

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

I think this is one of the things

:

00:54:36,103 --> 00:54:40,543

that, , frankly, the MAGA people, the

Republicans, the Tea Party, all of the

:

00:54:40,543 --> 00:54:44,863

kind of iterations of conservatism have

just been better at like conscientiously

:

00:54:44,863 --> 00:54:47,163

doing, we are going to say.

:

00:54:47,958 --> 00:54:49,338

Vaccines are liberal.

:

00:54:49,738 --> 00:54:53,808

We are going to say that, you

know, , being against fascism

:

00:54:53,808 --> 00:54:55,428

is lefty and therefore bad.

:

00:54:55,878 --> 00:54:59,538

And like, I mean, that, that is the thing

that above everything else that has been

:

00:54:59,538 --> 00:55:03,618

driving me crazy over the last couple of

weeks is these media conversations where

:

00:55:03,618 --> 00:55:08,178

it's like, but how do you feel about,

you know, these, these anti-fascists?

:

00:55:08,178 --> 00:55:12,198

And it's like, good, feel pretty

good about people who oppose fascism.

:

00:55:12,378 --> 00:55:14,238

I too oppose fascism.

:

00:55:14,418 --> 00:55:18,168

Like that would be, if Pi Morgan

asked me that question, I'd be like,

:

00:55:18,258 --> 00:55:19,908

thumbs up for the anti-fascists.

:

00:55:19,913 --> 00:55:22,413

Like, , like I'm on side for all of that.

:

00:55:22,633 --> 00:55:26,623

But like the, that is something

that they're very, very good at.

:

00:55:26,683 --> 00:55:27,313

And I think the.

:

00:55:27,713 --> 00:55:31,793

Frankly, the last 30 years

of the Democratic response to

:

00:55:31,793 --> 00:55:35,033

that has been to apologize.

:

00:55:35,433 --> 00:55:36,183

Oh, I'm sorry.

:

00:55:36,393 --> 00:55:38,883

I, I, we, we were offending real America.

:

00:55:38,943 --> 00:55:41,313

And then also well, how

do we meet in the middle?

:

00:55:41,493 --> 00:55:44,613

Like, oh, maybe, maybe because you are

real America and we are obviously not.

:

00:55:44,733 --> 00:55:47,013

We should get closer to

where you are on this.

:

00:55:47,073 --> 00:55:49,533

And of course then they get

closer to where they are on this

:

00:55:49,533 --> 00:55:50,973

and find, oh, that doesn't work.

:

00:55:51,073 --> 00:55:54,583

The as reclined prescription of we should

run pro-life candidates in these states,

:

00:55:54,583 --> 00:56:00,160

or we should run cultural conservatives

in red states in order to win election

:

00:56:00,490 --> 00:56:05,860

feels like conceding something that maybe

that's actually not the move to make.

:

00:56:05,890 --> 00:56:09,790

Maybe the move to make is to

push and to try to push public

:

00:56:09,790 --> 00:56:11,170

opinion while you're at it.

:

00:56:11,200 --> 00:56:13,840

That like instead of chasing

public opinion, you actually

:

00:56:13,840 --> 00:56:14,560

try to leader shape it.

:

00:56:14,960 --> 00:56:17,330

Which I think is what you were saying at

the very beginning of this conversation,

:

00:56:17,675 --> 00:56:19,325

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

100%, yes.

:

00:56:19,535 --> 00:56:21,065

I mean, I think the deference.

:

00:56:21,465 --> 00:56:26,480

Is, , exceptionally frustrating to me

sometimes it feels like conservatives

:

00:56:26,480 --> 00:56:30,230

are just evaluating the world they

have versus the world they want and

:

00:56:30,230 --> 00:56:34,850

responding organically, and that liberals

are looking at the electorate and the

:

00:56:34,850 --> 00:56:36,830

country as like a science experiment.

:

00:56:37,216 --> 00:56:40,576

, I just wanna try to understand, I just

wanna understand them a little bit better.

:

00:56:40,576 --> 00:56:42,286

There's, there's just

an understanding gap.

:

00:56:42,594 --> 00:56:45,864

It's not to say that that's not

necessarily true, but on the

:

00:56:45,864 --> 00:56:51,144

numbers, we are not a minority

liberals, Democrats on the numbers.

:

00:56:51,144 --> 00:56:52,194

We are not a minority.

:

00:56:52,794 --> 00:56:58,744

So let's just start there and then

appreciate the fact that when, when

:

00:56:58,744 --> 00:57:01,114

Trump lost, he said we cheated.

:

00:57:01,199 --> 00:57:01,619

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

00:57:01,894 --> 00:57:03,874

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

And when we lose, we try to

:

00:57:03,874 --> 00:57:05,164

extend to the other side.

:

00:57:05,599 --> 00:57:06,709

Understand them better.

:

00:57:07,159 --> 00:57:11,449

I find that an incredibly frustrating

response for several reasons.

:

00:57:11,539 --> 00:57:16,169

One of which is, and to return to

your Ezra Klein example, it feels

:

00:57:16,199 --> 00:57:21,122

like this moment of reevaluation

and capitulation of just like, oh,

:

00:57:21,122 --> 00:57:23,792

I guess they, they didn't wanna buy

what we were selling, so let's, let's

:

00:57:23,792 --> 00:57:25,652

figure out how we sell something else.

:

00:57:26,282 --> 00:57:27,992

I don't wanna sell anything else.

:

00:57:28,392 --> 00:57:32,127

Your, your loyal consumers don't

want you to change the product.

:

00:57:32,907 --> 00:57:36,747

Don't sell something else, especially

if you don't believe in it.

:

00:57:37,224 --> 00:57:40,704

There is such a difference between

trying to appeal to more moderate

:

00:57:40,704 --> 00:57:44,364

people or people who exist outside of

your ecosystem, your media ecosystem,

:

00:57:44,429 --> 00:57:44,749

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

00:57:45,149 --> 00:57:51,029

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

and talking to the most extreme, radical,

:

00:57:51,449 --> 00:57:54,989

organized, powerful, possible people.

:

00:57:55,379 --> 00:57:56,849

That is not how you get to the middle.

:

00:57:57,179 --> 00:58:00,389

And I've had to say this to a few

people in my life who sort of, uh,

:

00:58:00,569 --> 00:58:04,179

again, like responded with this sort

of like incredibly sad, I guess this

:

00:58:04,179 --> 00:58:05,379

isn't the country that I thought it was.

:

00:58:05,379 --> 00:58:09,579

I guess most people don't agree with

me response to:

:

00:58:09,579 --> 00:58:12,009

yeah, I mean, I guess, you know, in

order to understand the country a little

:

00:58:12,009 --> 00:58:14,439

bit better, in order to bridge those

divides in order to appeal to more

:

00:58:14,439 --> 00:58:17,589

voters and broaden the tent, we have

to talk to people like Steve Bannon.

:

00:58:17,989 --> 00:58:19,409

Why, why?

:

00:58:19,499 --> 00:58:22,439

And for one thing though, like

people who are actually moderate

:

00:58:22,439 --> 00:58:23,519

don't listen to Steve Bannon.

:

00:58:24,299 --> 00:58:26,339

They don't, they probably don't

listen to politics, period.

:

00:58:26,739 --> 00:58:29,379

Go someplace apolitical

if that's the goal.

:

00:58:29,619 --> 00:58:32,484

But there's this idea of like, I'm

blue, you're red, and if I just

:

00:58:32,504 --> 00:58:33,724

mix 'em, then we'll get purple.

:

00:58:34,164 --> 00:58:34,824

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yes.

:

00:58:35,019 --> 00:58:37,704

I, I think this is, I think this is right,

I was saying this to someone the other

:

00:58:37,704 --> 00:58:41,244

day they were talking to me about wanting

to understand people's kinda engagement

:

00:58:41,244 --> 00:58:44,334

in civic participation and their,

their models of civic participation.

:

00:58:44,334 --> 00:58:48,204

And I have spent a lot of time

researching the concept of civic

:

00:58:48,204 --> 00:58:51,114

participation and the ladder of civic

participation, those things, which

:

00:58:51,114 --> 00:58:52,434

is a conversation for another time.

:

00:58:52,764 --> 00:58:57,174

, But like one of the things that I

think if you want to take at face

:

00:58:57,174 --> 00:59:01,264

value that, , Trump and, and his,

you know, MAGA ilk going on all of

:

00:59:01,264 --> 00:59:07,344

these, , non politics podcasts, , to

reach young men specifically,

:

00:59:07,644 --> 00:59:11,304

. Played, you know, an important

role in his, his victory in:

:

00:59:11,594 --> 00:59:14,564

, , Then a thing you have to understand

is that a lot of people do not

:

00:59:14,564 --> 00:59:19,574

apprehend civic participation or

news through traditional channels.

:

00:59:19,574 --> 00:59:24,224

They are not volunteering in their

community or part of a church group

:

00:59:24,224 --> 00:59:29,234

or, uh, you know, knocking on doors

during elections or whatever they are,

:

00:59:29,264 --> 00:59:32,654

or participating in marches or going

to, you know, town council meetings.

:

00:59:32,954 --> 00:59:37,934

, They are watching streamers on

Twitch and they are listening to

:

00:59:37,934 --> 00:59:39,194

the radio while they're at work.

:

00:59:39,224 --> 00:59:43,044

And they are, , you know,

watching the football like that.

:

00:59:43,044 --> 00:59:48,124

That is, that is where they are

getting their information and, , I

:

00:59:48,124 --> 00:59:48,994

should put information, quotes.

:

00:59:48,994 --> 00:59:49,894

It is in fact information.

:

00:59:49,894 --> 00:59:53,434

It's just, it's not news channels

and yet they are absorbing

:

00:59:53,434 --> 00:59:54,604

news through those things

:

00:59:55,024 --> 00:59:59,534

it may not be how you want it to be

as a highly educated person, but it

:

00:59:59,534 --> 01:00:02,894

is how it is for a lot of people.

:

01:00:03,644 --> 01:00:06,284

You know, my, my, my friend

Nicole spends most of the day,

:

01:00:06,554 --> 01:00:07,904

as she would put it, rub an ass.

:

01:00:07,934 --> 01:00:11,774

Like, she's not listening

to, you know, Adam Toos talk

:

01:00:11,774 --> 01:00:13,514

about economics on a podcast.

:

01:00:13,514 --> 01:00:14,864

Like that's not what she's doing.

:

01:00:14,864 --> 01:00:17,954

And she's a, you know, she has a

college degree, but she has this kind

:

01:00:17,954 --> 01:00:21,314

of service industry, job . And she

has two kids and she's busy and like.

:

01:00:21,689 --> 01:00:26,189

You know, she gets information where

she gets it and it's a random video that

:

01:00:26,189 --> 01:00:27,989

someone shares on her Facebook wall.

:

01:00:28,079 --> 01:00:30,299

And do we even have walls

on Facebook anymore?

:

01:00:30,299 --> 01:00:30,899

I dunno, I left.

:

01:00:30,899 --> 01:00:34,679

But like that, that kind of,

that's, it's ambient, right?

:

01:00:34,679 --> 01:00:37,829

It's just sort of vibes coming

at her and conversation.

:

01:00:37,829 --> 01:00:41,159

She overhears at the reception

desk and stuff for her husband

:

01:00:41,159 --> 01:00:42,719

talks about and stuff her dad says.

:

01:00:42,719 --> 01:00:45,539

And like, that's how

she's getting the news.

:

01:00:45,899 --> 01:00:49,339

And , and frankly, she's not

altogether inclined to watch the news.

:

01:00:49,339 --> 01:00:52,039

Like the thing that she was most excited

about, that she'd watched recently,

:

01:00:52,069 --> 01:00:54,799

last time I talked to her was the

Charlie Sheen documentary on Netflix.

:

01:00:54,799 --> 01:00:57,649

Like, that's, that was the thing

that she was most interested in.

:

01:00:57,709 --> 01:00:59,959

And like, that's the ordinary person.

:

01:01:00,359 --> 01:01:03,029

And so if you want to do

something else, then like.

:

01:01:03,794 --> 01:01:05,144

Skate to the puck, man.

:

01:01:05,204 --> 01:01:09,939

Like, like I just, and, and to your

point, like no brand would do this, right?

:

01:01:09,969 --> 01:01:10,089

No.

:

01:01:10,119 --> 01:01:10,329

No.

:

01:01:10,329 --> 01:01:13,869

Brand would say, well, there's a

whole lot of people who will never

:

01:01:13,869 --> 01:01:16,899

buy our product and so I guess we

better stop making our product.

:

01:01:17,109 --> 01:01:20,559

Like, instead you go, well, we've

got this group of people that are

:

01:01:20,559 --> 01:01:24,429

buying our product pretty, you know,

consistently, and we wanna keep them.

:

01:01:24,954 --> 01:01:27,534

And we might make a new

product for somebody else.

:

01:01:27,534 --> 01:01:30,684

I mean, that's the difference in, in

commercial land is like, you might

:

01:01:30,684 --> 01:01:32,094

make a new product for somebody else.

:

01:01:32,754 --> 01:01:36,654

But I also had a client, you know, two

years ago in, in, , sports apparel.

:

01:01:36,684 --> 01:01:39,944

And we did a audience segmentation

for them you know, a youth segment.

:

01:01:40,004 --> 01:01:43,754

And when we came back to them, we had

like, you know, as you usually do,

:

01:01:43,814 --> 01:01:45,104

somewhere between four and six segments.

:

01:01:45,104 --> 01:01:47,084

I can't remember what they were, but

there was this one group that was

:

01:01:47,084 --> 01:01:50,474

super interesting because they did

not really act like the rest of them.

:

01:01:50,474 --> 01:01:52,664

They looked like the rest

of 'em demographically.

:

01:01:53,084 --> 01:01:54,944

They were a little less college educated.

:

01:01:54,944 --> 01:01:56,954

They were a little more blue collar.

:

01:01:57,224 --> 01:02:00,804

, They were a little bit lower income,

but they were more likely to tell

:

01:02:00,804 --> 01:02:03,654

me that their personal heroes

were people like Jordan Peterson.

:

01:02:03,834 --> 01:02:08,663

And they were more likely to express

kind of prepper tendencies, I would say.

:

01:02:08,754 --> 01:02:12,894

And so they read just like,

not hyperpartisan, but like low

:

01:02:12,924 --> 01:02:14,454

key, culturally conservative.

:

01:02:14,814 --> 01:02:17,694

And it kind of low key

pessimistic about the future.

:

01:02:18,384 --> 01:02:21,964

And , and we presented all these segments

and said, and and there's this interesting

:

01:02:21,964 --> 01:02:25,924

group, they're not a small group, but

I don't know how you feel about this.

:

01:02:25,984 --> 01:02:30,614

And they kind of went, well, they buy

our stuff, but we don't design for them.

:

01:02:31,014 --> 01:02:32,514

We design for these other groups.

:

01:02:32,934 --> 01:02:35,934

And so we're not gonna do anything to

like, say to them, we don't like you

:

01:02:35,934 --> 01:02:38,004

and we don't want you, but we're not

gonna do anything special for them

:

01:02:38,004 --> 01:02:42,594

either, because that would distract us

from what we're doing over here with

:

01:02:42,594 --> 01:02:45,444

this much larger set of people that

have more in common with one another.

:

01:02:45,564 --> 01:02:47,484

And like, this is just

a decision you make.

:

01:02:47,574 --> 01:02:50,634

It's not a I'm writing

you off, you're out.

:

01:02:51,034 --> 01:02:54,604

It's a look, you either like what we're

selling or we don't, but we're not gonna

:

01:02:54,634 --> 01:03:00,274

go out of our way to cater to you because

we have to serve this group of people.

:

01:03:00,674 --> 01:03:02,894

, Or we believe in this set

of values or we design our

:

01:03:02,894 --> 01:03:04,244

products in this particular way.

:

01:03:04,454 --> 01:03:08,779

And so I like, this is why I find

the like, well, I guess we're gonna

:

01:03:08,784 --> 01:03:12,444

have to throw a whole bunch of people

overboard in order to get these people

:

01:03:12,444 --> 01:03:14,484

that don't vote for us to vote for us.

:

01:03:14,604 --> 01:03:16,314

And my reaction to that is

like, well, why not just say

:

01:03:16,314 --> 01:03:17,904

that you're a Republican Ezra?

:

01:03:17,964 --> 01:03:21,572

Like if, if you feel like what is

happening here is that Republicans

:

01:03:21,572 --> 01:03:24,152

are winning and Democrats are losing

and you wanna be on the winning

:

01:03:24,152 --> 01:03:25,892

team, you could just do that.

:

01:03:25,922 --> 01:03:27,092

You could just switch.

:

01:03:27,259 --> 01:03:28,069

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

And well, and that's where I

:

01:03:28,069 --> 01:03:31,069

get stuck too, because it, you

know, and he references the

:

01:03:31,069 --> 01:03:32,509

fact that politics is for power.

:

01:03:32,509 --> 01:03:35,479

So my response to this idea of we

should run pro-life candidates in

:

01:03:35,479 --> 01:03:39,288

red areas, I mean, putting aside your

important factual correction, that

:

01:03:39,288 --> 01:03:41,149

that's not even a recipe for success.

:

01:03:41,549 --> 01:03:42,089

Why?

:

01:03:42,299 --> 01:03:45,239

I mean, I, what I couldn't quite grasp

in that, in that interview is whether he

:

01:03:45,239 --> 01:03:48,659

was advocating something of like a Trojan

horse, you know, like a sort of Brett

:

01:03:48,659 --> 01:03:52,169

Kavanaugh in his, in his confirmation

hearing saying, you know, I respect

:

01:03:52,169 --> 01:03:54,419

precedent and like, wink, wink, nod, nod.

:

01:03:54,479 --> 01:03:56,159

We all knew what he would do.

:

01:03:56,769 --> 01:03:59,079

, But he sort of played the game and,

and said what was necessary to say.

:

01:03:59,079 --> 01:04:02,829

I couldn't quite tell if it was sort of

like a, a, an operative strategy that he

:

01:04:02,829 --> 01:04:06,729

was recommending this idea of like, you

know, somebody that at the end of the

:

01:04:06,729 --> 01:04:10,479

day is gonna vote with us on abortion as

well as on every other important agenda

:

01:04:10,479 --> 01:04:14,619

item, but they're just sort of willing

to Trojan Horse their way into office.

:

01:04:15,069 --> 01:04:17,019

I couldn't tell if that

was part of the idea.

:

01:04:17,019 --> 01:04:18,309

I, I'm not in favor of that either.

:

01:04:18,699 --> 01:04:23,349

But if it was a straightforward idea

of like, we need to expand the tent,

:

01:04:23,349 --> 01:04:24,339

we need to make room for people.

:

01:04:24,739 --> 01:04:26,119

Who have pro-life views.

:

01:04:26,149 --> 01:04:29,599

My response to that is

why, sincerely, why?

:

01:04:29,599 --> 01:04:30,679

I mean, like, what, what?

:

01:04:31,099 --> 01:04:31,788

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

What does it get you?

:

01:04:31,969 --> 01:04:33,049

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

okay, so right.

:

01:04:33,049 --> 01:04:35,479

Let, well, so like, let's, let's

imagine that that was a strategy

:

01:04:35,479 --> 01:04:37,249

to pick up seats in, in red states.

:

01:04:37,249 --> 01:04:39,889

Let's imagine that that was a recipe

for success and that it worked.

:

01:04:40,099 --> 01:04:40,699

To what end?

:

01:04:41,284 --> 01:04:41,374

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

01:04:41,629 --> 01:04:45,949

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I mean, what proportion of Democrats who

:

01:04:46,429 --> 01:04:49,249

voted for Democrats in that given election

:

01:04:49,949 --> 01:04:50,169

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

say

:

01:04:50,269 --> 01:04:51,319

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

it's because they want to see

:

01:04:51,319 --> 01:04:52,429

Democrats protect abortion

:

01:04:52,739 --> 01:04:53,159

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

:

01:04:53,719 --> 01:04:54,979

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I mean, that is a core

:

01:04:54,979 --> 01:04:56,719

element of our platform.

:

01:04:57,349 --> 01:05:01,082

There is absolutely nothing in the

public opinion, , data to suggest that

:

01:05:01,082 --> 01:05:02,372

we should walk away from that position.

:

01:05:02,402 --> 01:05:05,762

It's, it's, it's popular, it's

exceptionally popular, under

:

01:05:05,762 --> 01:05:07,172

appropriate context and framing.

:

01:05:07,172 --> 01:05:10,352

And when you give all of those necessary

clues, but even when you don't and

:

01:05:10,352 --> 01:05:13,352

you evaluate it in the abstract, it's

popular even without that context.

:

01:05:13,592 --> 01:05:17,642

So like that example just didn't make,

if politics is for power, then what

:

01:05:17,642 --> 01:05:19,142

do you wanna use your power to do?

:

01:05:19,562 --> 01:05:20,372

What is the point?

:

01:05:20,717 --> 01:05:21,887

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Strategically, it also doesn't

:

01:05:21,887 --> 01:05:23,147

make any damn sense, right?

:

01:05:23,482 --> 01:05:27,337

We, we have been here before

with the so-called, the blue dog

:

01:05:27,337 --> 01:05:29,587

Democrats, the conservative Democrats.

:

01:05:29,804 --> 01:05:31,994

, They made it exceptionally hard

to pass the Affordable Care Act.

:

01:05:32,314 --> 01:05:35,774

, Manchin and cinema made it exceptionally

hard to do a lot of things, , during

:

01:05:35,774 --> 01:05:40,964

the Biden administration and like,

so, okay, we, we have the numbers.

:

01:05:40,994 --> 01:05:41,864

What are they for?

:

01:05:41,894 --> 01:05:47,054

I guess they're for, , approving judicial

nominees and cabinet nominees and other

:

01:05:47,054 --> 01:05:50,674

executive, , you know, agency heads

that have to have Senate confirmation.

:

01:05:50,704 --> 01:05:51,154

Like that.

:

01:05:51,154 --> 01:05:53,254

That sounds to me like

that's what that's for.

:

01:05:53,654 --> 01:05:57,629

And then there is this problem of you have

to then govern and you have to show that

:

01:05:57,629 --> 01:06:01,724

you got things done that consolidate your

electorate, that attract more people to

:

01:06:01,724 --> 01:06:05,654

you because you were successful that, you

know, satisfy the people who are in your

:

01:06:05,654 --> 01:06:07,574

tent who did the work to get you elected.

:

01:06:07,663 --> 01:06:11,744

And if you instead have a whole bunch of

spoilers, a whole bunch of Joe Lieberman's

:

01:06:11,744 --> 01:06:14,504

and Bart stoop acts and whatever, sitting

around going, no, I don't think so.

:

01:06:14,504 --> 01:06:16,964

I think I like, I think I like

private healthcare better.

:

01:06:16,964 --> 01:06:17,444

Thank you.

:

01:06:17,634 --> 01:06:18,234

, Than like.

:

01:06:18,849 --> 01:06:20,329

Where, what are we like again?

:

01:06:20,329 --> 01:06:21,409

What are we doing?

:

01:06:21,469 --> 01:06:24,979

And I, part of the reason I think that

people do feel so dissatisfied with both

:

01:06:24,979 --> 01:06:29,099

parties, , but Democrats in particular

are so down on the democratic party.

:

01:06:29,099 --> 01:06:33,419

Leadership is just like, what have you

guys done for us lately that actually paid

:

01:06:33,419 --> 01:06:35,969

off in near enough terms for us to get it?

:

01:06:35,969 --> 01:06:39,959

Like it just today we were talking about

whether or not to replace our circuit

:

01:06:39,959 --> 01:06:43,979

panel and wondering if that would have

any kind of, you know, should we do it

:

01:06:43,979 --> 01:06:48,538

before the end of the year when the IRA

tax credits expire for those kind of green

:

01:06:48,538 --> 01:06:50,839

energy and, and efficiency, , purchases.

:

01:06:50,939 --> 01:06:53,729

Setting those things to

expire ever was stupid.

:

01:06:53,839 --> 01:06:59,009

, Setting them, , to not

start until:

:

01:06:59,069 --> 01:07:03,059

Like all of these bargaining, you

know, chips that they do make, make

:

01:07:03,059 --> 01:07:06,029

it so that people feel like, well,

you said you did it, but I haven't

:

01:07:06,029 --> 01:07:07,349

seen it hit my bank account yet.

:

01:07:07,349 --> 01:07:10,739

I haven't seen it hit my

pocketbook as they like to say yet.

:

01:07:10,859 --> 01:07:11,879

And so like.

:

01:07:12,324 --> 01:07:12,714

I don't know.

:

01:07:12,714 --> 01:07:17,049

It, it feels to me, , there's a, a, a

parallel conversation to the Ezra Tasi

:

01:07:17,049 --> 01:07:21,129

Coates one, which was Tim Miller and Van

Lathan from The Ringer talking about this.

:

01:07:21,129 --> 01:07:23,709

And one of the things that Van Lathan

said that I loved was this idea

:

01:07:23,709 --> 01:07:26,959

of like, I'll tell you what, I'll

trade you seas, I'll trade you some,

:

01:07:27,079 --> 01:07:28,669

some compassion for some courage.

:

01:07:28,819 --> 01:07:32,929

Like you can give me your compassion

and I'll give you some of my courage

:

01:07:32,959 --> 01:07:36,979

because we need to actually do some

stuff here and the kind of get caught

:

01:07:36,979 --> 01:07:39,679

trying thing is a big part of it.

:

01:07:39,709 --> 01:07:45,239

The pressing your message and making

things salient and, pounding, , the table

:

01:07:45,239 --> 01:07:50,099

and going on every podcast or going on

every TV show or showing up everywhere.

:

01:07:50,429 --> 01:07:51,989

Like, I honestly don't know why.

:

01:07:52,389 --> 01:07:53,349

It's not just like.

:

01:07:53,804 --> 01:08:00,044

The Grateful Dead perpetually on

tour, you know, Bernie, a OC, Ani,

:

01:08:00,314 --> 01:08:04,754

John Ossoff, whoever, like just stay

on tour, go out talking all the time.

:

01:08:04,994 --> 01:08:09,464

I don't know why we're not doing kind

of participatory democracy exercises

:

01:08:09,464 --> 01:08:13,004

where people are able to, you know,

get together in small groups and talk

:

01:08:13,004 --> 01:08:16,904

about what they want and talk about

what their problems are and invite

:

01:08:16,904 --> 01:08:19,964

their friends who don't know anything

about politics instead of these like

:

01:08:19,964 --> 01:08:22,604

very top down organized structures.

:

01:08:22,934 --> 01:08:26,624

Like there is a way to show what the

alternative would look like when you don't

:

01:08:26,624 --> 01:08:28,184

have any power to do the alternative.

:

01:08:28,274 --> 01:08:31,184

And instead we're doing

the Play Dead routine.

:

01:08:31,514 --> 01:08:33,224

But like, what are we doing

:

01:08:33,624 --> 01:08:34,613

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

What are we doing?

:

01:08:35,408 --> 01:08:37,959

Being the opposition party is a verb

:

01:08:38,499 --> 01:08:38,919

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

01:08:39,068 --> 01:08:40,179

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

that is an active,

:

01:08:40,899 --> 01:08:41,118

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yes.

:

01:08:41,229 --> 01:08:42,368

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

opportunity to do something

:

01:08:42,374 --> 01:08:43,658

very active with that.

:

01:08:44,318 --> 01:08:45,368

I would say, you know.

:

01:08:45,969 --> 01:08:47,529

Something that feels

relevant at this point in the

:

01:08:47,529 --> 01:08:50,889

conversation is to mention this.

:

01:08:50,919 --> 01:08:55,328

There's this question that I like to

ask, in my research, I like to give

:

01:08:55,328 --> 01:08:59,919

people a list of options and ask them to

indicate what they think are the biggest

:

01:08:59,919 --> 01:09:06,078

problems our politics and our, our world

as it functions now, and what they think

:

01:09:06,408 --> 01:09:08,538

the most impactful solutions would be.

:

01:09:08,959 --> 01:09:15,434

So two separate questions repeatedly

across place, across race, across

:

01:09:15,465 --> 01:09:17,415

age, I see the same things.

:

01:09:17,711 --> 01:09:25,144

People broadly are fed up with feeling

that our political leaders care more

:

01:09:25,144 --> 01:09:30,493

about scoring points for their team

than about delivering real results, and

:

01:09:30,493 --> 01:09:33,630

that they're excessively beholden to

special interests , and corporations

:

01:09:33,904 --> 01:09:34,193

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

what

:

01:09:34,249 --> 01:09:35,184

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

they want to see.

:

01:09:35,621 --> 01:09:39,491

Is leaders who will put regular

people above partisan bickering

:

01:09:39,890 --> 01:09:40,111

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

and

:

01:09:40,111 --> 01:09:41,970

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

and above the wealthy and will

:

01:09:41,970 --> 01:09:43,770

actually serve the public.

:

01:09:44,341 --> 01:09:44,631

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

that

:

01:09:44,881 --> 01:09:46,381

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

sounds really obvious.

:

01:09:46,781 --> 01:09:51,341

It's also something that I would love

to see become a concerted strategy of

:

01:09:51,431 --> 01:09:56,001

a visual optic strategy and a messaging

strategy, because I'm not sure that

:

01:09:56,001 --> 01:10:01,502

we've made meaningful use of it yet,

I'm not sure that that has been tried,

:

01:10:01,502 --> 01:10:05,132

and I'm not sure that that has really

been promised beyond a couple of

:

01:10:05,132 --> 01:10:07,442

isolated candidates and circumstances.

:

01:10:07,502 --> 01:10:12,332

But really that is what everybody is sick

of, and that is what everybody wants.

:

01:10:12,392 --> 01:10:16,442

They are just so tired of feeling

like elected officials are trying

:

01:10:16,442 --> 01:10:20,342

to beat elected officials on

the other side of the aisle.

:

01:10:21,002 --> 01:10:24,627

They're trying to point fingers, they're

trying to blame, , rather than just

:

01:10:24,722 --> 01:10:26,402

trying to make people's lives better.

:

01:10:26,747 --> 01:10:29,837

And again, I realize

how obvious that sounds.

:

01:10:30,257 --> 01:10:33,587

I realize how many people who hold

elected office now might feel like

:

01:10:33,587 --> 01:10:34,997

that's exactly what they are doing.

:

01:10:35,397 --> 01:10:36,507

It's not breaking through.

:

01:10:37,013 --> 01:10:39,443

I'm not going to give everyone the

benefit of the doubt and say that

:

01:10:39,443 --> 01:10:41,693

that's what everybody is doing, but

I'm sure that that is what a lot

:

01:10:41,693 --> 01:10:42,833

of people feel that they are doing.

:

01:10:42,833 --> 01:10:44,423

And some of them are doing it really well.

:

01:10:44,573 --> 01:10:46,133

Some of them are doing it really well.

:

01:10:46,673 --> 01:10:49,733

But by and large, I would love to

see that become our political brand.

:

01:10:49,793 --> 01:10:53,183

If there is going to be some sort of

reckoning of like, we need to adjust,

:

01:10:53,183 --> 01:10:56,363

we need to shift, we need to change, we

need to appeal to people in a new way.

:

01:10:56,763 --> 01:10:58,563

Let's not throw women under the bus.

:

01:10:58,743 --> 01:11:00,813

Let's not throw immigrants under the bus.

:

01:11:01,213 --> 01:11:02,713

Let's not turn on our neighbor.

:

01:11:03,113 --> 01:11:10,383

Why don't we try going all in on a

more authentic approach to politics in

:

01:11:10,383 --> 01:11:15,633

which we are in a much more deliberate

way, issuing special interest money.

:

01:11:15,773 --> 01:11:22,713

Cracking down on exploitative corporate

policy and incorporating as a messaging

:

01:11:22,713 --> 01:11:28,983

strategy and as a communication

strategy wherever possible, centering

:

01:11:29,223 --> 01:11:33,853

the voter and the American public

and couching everything in terms of

:

01:11:33,853 --> 01:11:40,063

whether they are being served well

rather than using politics and using

:

01:11:40,063 --> 01:11:41,983

whatever fight we are currently having.

:

01:11:41,983 --> 01:11:45,043

Framing it through the lens of

like a political football and

:

01:11:45,043 --> 01:11:47,023

a horse race and a competition.

:

01:11:47,423 --> 01:11:49,313

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

There is a lot of talk of authenticity

:

01:11:49,313 --> 01:11:51,233

and I see it too with our brand clients.

:

01:11:51,233 --> 01:11:54,323

Like, you know, consumers

value authenticity from brands

:

01:11:54,323 --> 01:11:56,273

and it's like, okay, but but

what the hell does that mean?

:

01:11:56,273 --> 01:11:56,543

Right?

:

01:11:56,593 --> 01:11:58,723

Some of it is like, it has

to pass the smell test.

:

01:11:58,723 --> 01:12:03,133

Like, don't tell me like BP that

you are beyond petroleum and

:

01:12:03,133 --> 01:12:04,633

that you're now a green company.

:

01:12:04,633 --> 01:12:05,893

I know what you do for a living.

:

01:12:05,973 --> 01:12:09,633

Maybe that's actually the better way of

articulating what does authenticity mean?

:

01:12:09,753 --> 01:12:10,863

It means don't lie to me.

:

01:12:11,493 --> 01:12:16,023

And this I think is, . It's just like the

thing that's missing most of the time.

:

01:12:16,053 --> 01:12:19,373

And I think this is the, the another

piece of the frustration with, Ezra's,

:

01:12:19,403 --> 01:12:20,663

you know, politics is about power.

:

01:12:20,693 --> 01:12:25,913

Okay, what's the power for , just

winning is kind of insufficient

:

01:12:26,313 --> 01:12:27,423

for the moment, right?

:

01:12:27,423 --> 01:12:30,243

Like, this is not merely about

winning the next election.

:

01:12:30,243 --> 01:12:34,863

We have an a party in power who very

clearly would be perfectly happy

:

01:12:34,863 --> 01:12:39,073

for the federal government to be one

branch and just the executive , the

:

01:12:39,073 --> 01:12:43,393

Republican Congress has basically

abdicated most of their responsibilities.

:

01:12:43,633 --> 01:12:45,943

The executive branch has said you

can pass whatever budget you want.

:

01:12:45,943 --> 01:12:48,373

We'll only spend what we wanna

spend on what we wanna spend it on.

:

01:12:48,523 --> 01:12:51,913

And , and we have a Roberts court

that's just sort of willing to say,

:

01:12:52,033 --> 01:12:53,233

you go on with your bad selves.

:

01:12:53,293 --> 01:12:58,343

And like that is, that's the world

they're perfectly happy having and.

:

01:12:59,003 --> 01:13:02,003

That is a problem that is

a much bigger problem than

:

01:13:02,003 --> 01:13:04,343

expanding the child tax credit.

:

01:13:05,123 --> 01:13:11,423

And like should we be moving towards like

broader principles in the conversation

:

01:13:11,693 --> 01:13:14,243

instead of just sort of defaulting to

this like, well, the average person

:

01:13:14,243 --> 01:13:16,823

doesn't know what democracy means and

they also don't know what an oligarch is.

:

01:13:16,823 --> 01:13:20,123

And so I guess we'll just go back

to talking about expanding Medicaid

:

01:13:20,663 --> 01:13:23,693

and it's like, I mean, I think you

have to walk and chew gum at the same

:

01:13:23,693 --> 01:13:26,813

time, probably here, but like what's

the, why are we expanding Medicaid?

:

01:13:27,053 --> 01:13:30,983

What is it that we believe that then

makes us choose this policy as opposed

:

01:13:30,983 --> 01:13:34,013

to just like choosing a policy and then

hoping that that adds up to something,

:

01:13:34,403 --> 01:13:35,843

which I feel like is very much like.

:

01:13:36,488 --> 01:13:37,298

For good or ill.

:

01:13:37,598 --> 01:13:39,728

The policy sphere is where

as recline comes from.

:

01:13:39,728 --> 01:13:40,748

It's where he's most comfortable.

:

01:13:40,748 --> 01:13:44,358

He would very much like to go back there,

he said, so in the interview, , and

:

01:13:44,358 --> 01:13:48,498

like, just leave me alone so I can think

about policy positions and, you know,

:

01:13:48,498 --> 01:13:50,538

read NBER papers and, and be happy.

:

01:13:50,568 --> 01:13:54,077

And that's the world he wants to

get back to, you know, peace time.

:

01:13:54,438 --> 01:13:57,048

But in the meantime, he seems to

be willing to sit across the table

:

01:13:57,048 --> 01:14:00,408

from his friend and say, but I might

have to kick you out of the tent.

:

01:14:00,827 --> 01:14:04,338

Like I, I might have to throw you over in

order to get these other people to agree

:

01:14:04,338 --> 01:14:06,108

with me just enough to get into power.

:

01:14:06,508 --> 01:14:09,238

And like, then what, then

what do you do with it?

:

01:14:09,793 --> 01:14:11,233

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

uh, that's where I get stuck always

:

01:14:11,233 --> 01:14:13,633

is like to make what kind of world

:

01:14:13,918 --> 01:14:15,808

Authenticity can mean a

lot of different things.

:

01:14:15,808 --> 01:14:18,148

There's actually, I've seen some really

interesting research showing that, you

:

01:14:18,148 --> 01:14:23,368

know, when people say and respond to

Trump with this idea that he's authentic,

:

01:14:23,758 --> 01:14:24,178

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm.

:

01:14:24,508 --> 01:14:26,068

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

their metric for authenticity

:

01:14:26,068 --> 01:14:27,568

is, is prejudice.

:

01:14:27,968 --> 01:14:33,138

, like, the fact that he says

such prejudice things indicates

:

01:14:33,138 --> 01:14:34,428

that he's not self-censoring.

:

01:14:34,458 --> 01:14:38,418

And it proves to me that he is honest

and that he is an authentic person.

:

01:14:38,818 --> 01:14:41,458

So authenticity can mean a lot of

different things, and some of them can

:

01:14:41,458 --> 01:14:44,098

be very sinister as, as the interpreted.

:

01:14:44,198 --> 01:14:47,738

, an important piece of authenticity,

if we're looking at it, you know,

:

01:14:47,827 --> 01:14:51,314

from the, side of wanting to do

good in the world and not poison it

:

01:14:51,339 --> 01:14:51,759

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

01:14:52,064 --> 01:14:54,114

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

is what you mean, and.

:

01:14:54,114 --> 01:14:57,174

Have something to say, I think is

the other half of that equation.

:

01:14:57,264 --> 01:15:00,864

And that's where I get worried again

about this idea of moderating and where

:

01:15:00,864 --> 01:15:03,324

I keep coming back to the question

of, to make what kind of world.

:

01:15:03,474 --> 01:15:07,584

And I wanna say like, I understand and

I empathize with this idea of wanting

:

01:15:07,584 --> 01:15:10,943

to win for the sake of winning under

these circumstances, because I do

:

01:15:10,943 --> 01:15:15,174

understand why that has value in and of

itself when it feels like it's us or the

:

01:15:15,174 --> 01:15:19,794

autocrats like it's us or it's decline

and fascism at the end of this road.

:

01:15:20,184 --> 01:15:23,094

And we just dunno how, how far down

the road they're going to walk us

:

01:15:23,094 --> 01:15:24,534

before we're able to course correct it.

:

01:15:24,774 --> 01:15:29,424

So if the question is like, you know,

hold ground on the status quo, it's us

:

01:15:29,424 --> 01:15:32,254

or it's them, I empathize with that view.

:

01:15:32,344 --> 01:15:32,764

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

01:15:33,244 --> 01:15:35,614

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I understand and empathize with the

:

01:15:35,614 --> 01:15:39,634

general impulse to get more cautious

when the stakes feel really high.

:

01:15:40,174 --> 01:15:43,174

I just don't think it is going to work.

:

01:15:43,174 --> 01:15:45,214

I don't think it's going

to work and that's the main

:

01:15:45,214 --> 01:15:46,324

reason why I wouldn't do it.

:

01:15:47,104 --> 01:15:51,334

I also think even if it did work,

it wouldn't accomplish anything.

:

01:15:51,589 --> 01:15:51,919

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Right.

:

01:15:52,318 --> 01:15:54,779

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

So I don't see why voters

:

01:15:54,779 --> 01:15:56,009

would see it any differently.

:

01:15:56,429 --> 01:15:59,669

I think you mentioned this earlier

in the conversation, but the idea

:

01:15:59,669 --> 01:16:02,669

of trying to appeal to more voters

by sounding more like a Republican,

:

01:16:02,669 --> 01:16:04,499

I think is just kind of a dead end.

:

01:16:04,529 --> 01:16:07,139

Because if that's what they

want, they have a candidate.

:

01:16:07,539 --> 01:16:09,639

Most of our elections are not nonpartisan.

:

01:16:10,179 --> 01:16:10,389

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yep.

:

01:16:10,479 --> 01:16:12,068

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

If it's a Democrat and a Republican

:

01:16:12,068 --> 01:16:14,469

running, and the Democrat wants

to win more votes by sounding more

:

01:16:14,469 --> 01:16:17,349

like the Republican, all that's

going to do is reinforce the idea

:

01:16:17,349 --> 01:16:19,809

of like, yeah, those are the good

ideas, and that guy has more of them.

:

01:16:19,899 --> 01:16:21,459

So I just, I have a candidate.

:

01:16:21,549 --> 01:16:22,629

That's what I wanna hear.

:

01:16:22,959 --> 01:16:24,129

I already have a guy.

:

01:16:24,223 --> 01:16:27,283

Being a halfway Republican is not gonna

be better than being a Republican.

:

01:16:27,283 --> 01:16:31,813

If what that voter wants is a Republican,

give an alternative, have an idea.

:

01:16:31,903 --> 01:16:33,763

What is your better world?

:

01:16:34,243 --> 01:16:35,743

That has to be the metric.

:

01:16:36,236 --> 01:16:38,541

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

so this is, this is I guess maybe

:

01:16:38,541 --> 01:16:41,241

a place where we can, , start

to come to an end since we're

:

01:16:41,241 --> 01:16:42,321

only like in an hour and a half.

:

01:16:42,371 --> 01:16:46,911

The like thing I keep thinking

about is also the kind of.

:

01:16:46,911 --> 01:16:52,876

Uh, concept of a coalitional

politics and how that has been.

:

01:16:53,426 --> 01:16:57,956

, I think that's like endemic to, as for

client's prescription, I think that's, , a

:

01:16:57,956 --> 01:17:02,696

lot of what winds up guiding, , some of

the message testing that gets publicized.

:

01:17:02,696 --> 01:17:05,366

It's some of the policy

positions that get publicized.

:

01:17:05,366 --> 01:17:10,186

It's even, I think part of the, , angst

about the so-called groups, right, is

:

01:17:10,186 --> 01:17:16,076

that like these are uneasy, , tentative,

, transactional possibly, , and certainly

:

01:17:16,076 --> 01:17:20,516

contingent coalitions where it's

like, I'll support you on abortion

:

01:17:20,516 --> 01:17:23,066

if you support me on healthcare.

:

01:17:23,066 --> 01:17:24,925

I'll support you on this if

you'll support me on that.

:

01:17:24,925 --> 01:17:26,366

And that's sort of the assumption of it.

:

01:17:26,516 --> 01:17:31,026

And the problem of course, is that

you then have people like, the

:

01:17:31,026 --> 01:17:34,266

lieberman's, the mansions, the

cinemas, whatever, who are like, well.

:

01:17:34,641 --> 01:17:39,641

You know, actually I'm not gonna,

I'm not gonna vote with you on, , you

:

01:17:39,641 --> 01:17:42,791

know, some of the green energy stuff

in the Inflation Reduction Act because

:

01:17:42,851 --> 01:17:46,151

look, my family money and my, my

state's economy is dependent on coal.

:

01:17:46,721 --> 01:17:49,391

So, no, no, there's,

there's no trade here.

:

01:17:49,571 --> 01:17:53,291

Sort of problem there is then it

doesn't really feel like they're a team.

:

01:17:53,951 --> 01:17:59,300

And if we're doing this now, , and we are

and have been for a long time as like team

:

01:17:59,300 --> 01:18:04,371

affiliations more like fandoms than like,

I dunno, I don't know, whatever they think

:

01:18:04,371 --> 01:18:08,871

they, that it is, , whatever the kind

of idealized version of what voters are.

:

01:18:08,871 --> 01:18:13,441

These like deliberative, beard,

stroking, long form reading, NPR,

:

01:18:13,441 --> 01:18:17,881

listening, , , people who are deeply

evaluating every policy position and

:

01:18:17,881 --> 01:18:20,761

weighing up the cost and benefits and

selecting their candidates accordingly.,

:

01:18:21,151 --> 01:18:24,121

You know, I, I think there's

this question in my mind of.

:

01:18:24,521 --> 01:18:31,751

If coalitions are so contingent and

so transactional that I'm willing

:

01:18:31,931 --> 01:18:37,481

to tell you to sit down for a while

while I court this other group of

:

01:18:37,481 --> 01:18:40,601

people that I'm hoping to bring into

coalition, to make the coalition big

:

01:18:40,601 --> 01:18:42,071

enough to get the outcome that I want.

:

01:18:42,471 --> 01:18:45,796

But I have no unifying vision

for what we should all have in

:

01:18:45,796 --> 01:18:48,556

common, what holds us together.

:

01:18:49,276 --> 01:18:50,656

It's just transactional.

:

01:18:50,686 --> 01:18:53,956

It's just to get through the next election

or just to get through the next vote.

:

01:18:54,556 --> 01:18:55,996

Then like what good is it?

:

01:18:56,026 --> 01:18:57,496

It feels extremely weak.

:

01:18:57,526 --> 01:19:02,446

It feels extremely soluble, and I

keep wondering about like, where

:

01:19:02,446 --> 01:19:03,946

is the politics of solidarity?

:

01:19:03,976 --> 01:19:05,386

Like what, what does that look like?

:

01:19:05,386 --> 01:19:10,856

What is the vision that is big enough that

in the same way that like, you know, Trump

:

01:19:10,856 --> 01:19:15,506

is one of these people that operates like

a lot of popular brands do, and that is

:

01:19:15,686 --> 01:19:19,046

people will hang on it whatever they want.

:

01:19:19,446 --> 01:19:23,226

Whatever they like about themselves

or wish that they were more like,

:

01:19:23,256 --> 01:19:28,686

or want for their own futures,

they will project onto that brand.

:

01:19:29,016 --> 01:19:32,675

And you know, the most, the most beloved

brands in the world, your Apples, your

:

01:19:32,675 --> 01:19:34,746

Cokes, your Nikes, they are like that.

:

01:19:34,746 --> 01:19:36,936

People will project anything onto them.

:

01:19:36,996 --> 01:19:38,346

And they're big tent brands.

:

01:19:38,376 --> 01:19:40,536

Like, they're not actively

trying to reject anybody.

:

01:19:40,986 --> 01:19:47,806

And so they create enough softness

around them in order to absorb that.

:

01:19:48,166 --> 01:19:52,576

But they also like pick something

aspirational that is easy

:

01:19:52,576 --> 01:19:53,746

for a lot of people to share.

:

01:19:53,776 --> 01:19:55,966

Like Apple for a long

time is about creativity.

:

01:19:56,326 --> 01:19:59,866

And Nike has this, if you're a

body, you're an athlete idea.

:

01:20:00,256 --> 01:20:02,986

And even if you're just gonna put

the sneakers on and mow the lawn

:

01:20:03,166 --> 01:20:06,196

deep down inside, we know that

you have the heart of an athlete.

:

01:20:06,196 --> 01:20:06,946

So we are for you.

:

01:20:07,336 --> 01:20:11,146

And, you know, Coke is about happiness

and like, that's, that's what it's about.

:

01:20:11,546 --> 01:20:14,636

These things are fairly ephemeral and

probably inappropriate for politics.

:

01:20:14,756 --> 01:20:18,356

But I think like there is still some kind

of like, what is the grand unifying idea?

:

01:20:18,356 --> 01:20:21,086

What, to your point, what is the

world we are trying to build?

:

01:20:21,136 --> 01:20:22,516

What is the point of this power?

:

01:20:22,576 --> 01:20:25,966

And when people like us recline talk

about it, it's this like, well, once

:

01:20:25,966 --> 01:20:28,636

we're in power will protect all of you.

:

01:20:29,086 --> 01:20:31,726

And it's like, okay, so

who's we and who's you?

:

01:20:31,816 --> 01:20:35,836

And like, why would I trust you to

protect me when you were willing to

:

01:20:35,836 --> 01:20:38,446

throw me under the bus in order to

get into power in the first place?

:

01:20:38,656 --> 01:20:41,116

It's just like, it, it

can't be this transactional.

:

01:20:41,116 --> 01:20:42,646

There has to be a better

vision for all of this.

:

01:20:42,646 --> 01:20:45,166

And then the final thing that I've just

been thinking about a lot is, and I'm

:

01:20:45,466 --> 01:20:46,606

curious what you'd make about any of it.

:

01:20:46,636 --> 01:20:49,486

We can carry on this conversation 'cause

we're not gonna solve it in seven minutes.

:

01:20:49,786 --> 01:20:54,336

But like there is a question

in my mind of this will be my

:

01:20:54,336 --> 01:20:56,136

left-handed optimism version of this.

:

01:20:56,166 --> 01:21:01,876

Like, let's, as a thought experiment,

, accept that, , the third Republic of

:

01:21:01,876 --> 01:21:06,346

the American constitutional system start

with the Articles of Confederation.

:

01:21:06,346 --> 01:21:07,876

Then you have the Amer,

the US Constitution.

:

01:21:07,876 --> 01:21:11,506

Then you have, reconstruction

and like, maybe we're on four,

:

01:21:11,506 --> 01:21:12,706

maybe we're on five, who knows.

:

01:21:12,706 --> 01:21:14,896

But like the, the next American Republic.

:

01:21:15,136 --> 01:21:16,696

Is it going to look like this one?

:

01:21:16,936 --> 01:21:18,046

Should it look like this one?

:

01:21:18,106 --> 01:21:22,456

Should we move into finally, because I

feel like we're still kind of in a liminal

:

01:21:22,456 --> 01:21:24,136

space between the 20th and 21st century.

:

01:21:24,136 --> 01:21:24,736

Sometimes.

:

01:21:25,036 --> 01:21:27,796

Like, can we move into being

a modern society with a modern

:

01:21:27,796 --> 01:21:31,546

constitution and a modern set of

values, and what would that look like?

:

01:21:31,606 --> 01:21:34,546

Might that be a better selling point?

:

01:21:34,546 --> 01:21:37,786

Rather than we're gonna reset

everything back to normal.

:

01:21:37,786 --> 01:21:40,876

We're gonna take everything back to the

way it was before Trump came on the scene.

:

01:21:40,925 --> 01:21:42,666

Those times weren't that great either.

:

01:21:42,963 --> 01:21:45,123

, Isn't this an opportunity to do.

:

01:21:45,827 --> 01:21:49,338

As I believe George Herbert Walker

Bush that one time, that vision thing

:

01:21:49,738 --> 01:21:54,238

is, isn't a time like, and is like,

isn't it a wonderful opportunity?

:

01:21:54,238 --> 01:21:55,228

You're out of power.

:

01:21:55,678 --> 01:21:58,138

You're not being allowed to govern,

you're not getting anything you want.

:

01:21:58,288 --> 01:22:03,228

Why not be building a, a solidarity

movement around a new American founding

:

01:22:03,618 --> 01:22:10,098

that like, brings everybody into the tent

as opposed to arguing about, you fall into

:

01:22:10,098 --> 01:22:13,848

this set of banners on the cross tabs, so

therefore you must care about this policy.

:

01:22:13,848 --> 01:22:15,978

And so we're gonna talk to you about

that policy and over here we're

:

01:22:15,978 --> 01:22:18,498

gonna talk to these people about

that policy and hope that somehow

:

01:22:18,498 --> 01:22:20,958

it all congeals into an electorate.

:

01:22:21,288 --> 01:22:23,327

It just, it, uh, when are we

gonna stop playing small ball?

:

01:22:23,448 --> 01:22:24,077

That's my question.

:

01:22:24,478 --> 01:22:24,768

Yeah.

:

01:22:24,943 --> 01:22:26,173

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

God, I wish I could answer that.

:

01:22:26,573 --> 01:22:31,103

Uh, to be honest, not to try to take

us out on a deeply dark note, but my

:

01:22:31,103 --> 01:22:36,023

longstanding fear, uh, since:

been that this is all going to get a lot

:

01:22:36,023 --> 01:22:37,282

worse before it gets measurably better.

:

01:22:37,795 --> 01:22:38,638

don't know how much worse.

:

01:22:38,698 --> 01:22:40,858

I don't know what the timeline

is, and I don't know if I'm right.

:

01:22:40,858 --> 01:22:42,618

You know, I'm like, I'm

not a prognosticator.

:

01:22:42,618 --> 01:22:45,488

I, I this is just a, a fear that

keeps me up in the middle of the

:

01:22:45,488 --> 01:22:46,718

night, so I'm just sharing it.

:

01:22:46,718 --> 01:22:49,058

So it can be a fear that keeps

everybody off, that listens to

:

01:22:49,058 --> 01:22:51,398

this up in the night if they would

like to add it to their roster.

:

01:22:52,088 --> 01:22:56,438

You know, the, I love the, the

idea it basically, I mean, and

:

01:22:56,438 --> 01:22:57,878

it's, it's out there, right?

:

01:22:57,878 --> 01:23:00,368

This idea of like, Democrats

need a project:

:

01:23:01,103 --> 01:23:01,373

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

:

01:23:01,733 --> 01:23:02,543

Please don't call it that.

:

01:23:02,813 --> 01:23:03,202

But yes,

:

01:23:03,278 --> 01:23:03,758

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Right?

:

01:23:04,053 --> 01:23:12,965

Yeah, I, I think what I most want is a

version that sounds like yours and not

:

01:23:13,265 --> 01:23:16,295

a attempt to sort of reverse engineer.

:

01:23:16,695 --> 01:23:22,245

A popular platform that will bring most

people in under the tent, and that just

:

01:23:22,245 --> 01:23:25,665

sort of sidelines every issue that we

feel is a little bit thorny or a little

:

01:23:25,665 --> 01:23:29,565

bit divisive or, you know, splinters

the, the, the potential coalition in

:

01:23:29,565 --> 01:23:31,425

some way that, that feels inconvenient.

:

01:23:31,825 --> 01:23:35,815

I don't think that any meaningful change

in our politics and any meaningful

:

01:23:35,815 --> 01:23:39,925

improvement in our lives is going

to come from reverse engineering

:

01:23:40,325 --> 01:23:41,615

what we think is going to win

:

01:23:41,955 --> 01:23:42,375

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

mm-hmm.

:

01:23:42,605 --> 01:23:44,735

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

It has to be an answer to the

:

01:23:44,735 --> 01:23:47,265

question to build what kind of world.

:

01:23:47,915 --> 01:23:48,135

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yep.

:

01:23:48,675 --> 01:23:51,135

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

So as long as that's the North star,

:

01:23:51,645 --> 01:23:54,045

I think that's exactly where we

should be putting time and energy.

:

01:23:54,434 --> 01:23:58,005

And I would love to be wrong about

my pessimism that we're only going to

:

01:23:58,005 --> 01:24:02,665

get there as a function of having to

emerge from some really deep, dark pit.

:

01:24:03,445 --> 01:24:07,525

I would love to circumvent the

pit altogether and just, you know,

:

01:24:07,525 --> 01:24:10,434

what if we just tried this and

what if we just built momentum for

:

01:24:10,434 --> 01:24:11,865

it and, and what if we won on it?

:

01:24:12,275 --> 01:24:12,695

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Mm-hmm.

:

01:24:13,105 --> 01:24:15,655

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

I don't think there's anything else we

:

01:24:15,655 --> 01:24:17,335

can or should put our energy toward.

:

01:24:17,575 --> 01:24:18,985

I think that's what we have to try.

:

01:24:19,385 --> 01:24:24,965

My fear is that, you know, for one reason

or another, we're not going to be able

:

01:24:24,965 --> 01:24:30,275

to develop it successfully and sell it

successfully unless it is in response

:

01:24:30,275 --> 01:24:35,802

to, a, a meaningful worsening of our,

of our divides and of our circumstances.

:

01:24:36,312 --> 01:24:42,252

But I would love to be wrong about

that, and I feel like I'm putting my

:

01:24:42,282 --> 01:24:48,642

professional effort behind your version,

which is let's try now, let's try,

:

01:24:48,672 --> 01:24:49,992

let's try to build that right now.

:

01:24:50,112 --> 01:24:50,412

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yeah.

:

01:24:50,762 --> 01:24:51,992

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

But I do worry about

:

01:24:52,742 --> 01:24:52,982

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

when,

:

01:24:53,582 --> 01:24:55,142

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

we will actually succeed at it.

:

01:24:55,541 --> 01:24:56,952

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

When you've got all the warning lights

:

01:24:56,952 --> 01:25:01,812

flashing and, , we're accelerating towards

something whether we want to or not.

:

01:25:02,388 --> 01:25:03,648

, you couldn't see it coming.

:

01:25:03,648 --> 01:25:06,378

At the very least, you can

do some scenario planning

:

01:25:06,588 --> 01:25:10,907

and imagine various outcomes.

:

01:25:10,938 --> 01:25:13,848

You could sort of just decide to

go through the thought experiment

:

01:25:13,848 --> 01:25:17,058

of like, let's say this is all

temporary, everything goes fine in

:

01:25:17,058 --> 01:25:20,898

:

maybe they take back the Senate,

:

01:25:20,898 --> 01:25:22,733

probably not, but it gets close.

:

01:25:23,058 --> 01:25:28,678

And then in:

make it outta the primaries, right?

:

01:25:28,678 --> 01:25:29,038

And

:

01:25:29,168 --> 01:25:30,238

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

This is a beautiful dream.

:

01:25:30,478 --> 01:25:30,657

Go

:

01:25:30,688 --> 01:25:31,018

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

right.

:

01:25:31,048 --> 01:25:36,568

And, uh, and all the, and, and Pete

Hegseth does, but he is such a loser

:

01:25:36,968 --> 01:25:42,818

that he loses like profoundly to, I

don't care who, , uh, I don't know.

:

01:25:43,358 --> 01:25:46,358

You got anybody that, like, who,

if you could just play the fantasy

:

01:25:46,358 --> 01:25:50,118

baseball right now, who's, who's

democratic president in:

:

01:25:50,598 --> 01:25:50,988

I dunno.

:

01:25:51,048 --> 01:25:51,868

I don't even know who it would be.

:

01:25:52,503 --> 01:25:52,623

I,

:

01:25:53,048 --> 01:25:53,613

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Oh, God.

:

01:25:53,913 --> 01:25:55,653

I don't, I don't, I don't have a favorite.

:

01:25:55,713 --> 01:25:57,153

I haven't even gotten that far.

:

01:25:57,223 --> 01:26:00,073

, But if, if we're playing a little

fantasy game in which Pete Hegseth

:

01:26:00,073 --> 01:26:03,253

has taken down, I would love to be,

I would love for it to be a woman.

:

01:26:03,313 --> 01:26:03,913

Oh my God.

:

01:26:03,913 --> 01:26:04,663

I would love that.

:

01:26:04,723 --> 01:26:06,223

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

Yes, yes.

:

01:26:06,463 --> 01:26:07,273

That is true.

:

01:26:07,303 --> 01:26:09,853

That is the necessary condition

there for that to be really poetic.

:

01:26:09,943 --> 01:26:11,593

And so like that, that's

a beautiful future.

:

01:26:11,653 --> 01:26:14,623

We could, we could just sort of hope

that like actually the system isn't

:

01:26:14,623 --> 01:26:17,113

disintegrating under our feet and

it'll all be fine and we'll have our

:

01:26:17,113 --> 01:26:18,763

elections and then this will happen.

:

01:26:19,223 --> 01:26:22,223

, And, you know, the, the Democrats in

Congress will be able to stymie Trump

:

01:26:22,223 --> 01:26:26,282

for a couple years and, , the Supreme

Court will come to its senses and

:

01:26:26,373 --> 01:26:29,103

read the Constitution spontaneously.

:

01:26:29,853 --> 01:26:30,963

Well, they'll read the room, right.

:

01:26:30,963 --> 01:26:33,423

The Democrats will win and they'll be

like, eh, maybe we gotta pull this back.

:

01:26:33,452 --> 01:26:37,383

And so that's, that's one

on one end of the spectrum.

:

01:26:37,563 --> 01:26:41,523

And on the other end of the spectrum is

maybe not, I know that this is like a

:

01:26:41,523 --> 01:26:45,543

popular topic at the moment and I don't

really wanna, , speak it into existence.

:

01:26:45,573 --> 01:26:49,623

So I will not say the CW thing,

but I might say Balkanization.

:

01:26:50,268 --> 01:26:50,568

Right.

:

01:26:50,568 --> 01:26:56,988

That like you wind up having, you know,

California, Oregon, Washington, Illinois,

:

01:26:57,468 --> 01:27:00,468

whatever, a whole bunch of states just

kind of go, we're gonna piece out now.

:

01:27:00,468 --> 01:27:05,148

I mean, you have it even with Gavin Newsom

saying to California colleges, like,

:

01:27:05,148 --> 01:27:07,907

if you take the deal with the federal

government, you'll lose state funding.

:

01:27:08,448 --> 01:27:08,868

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Mm-hmm.

:

01:27:08,958 --> 01:27:11,327

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

And you have conversations about kind

:

01:27:11,327 --> 01:27:14,358

of forming intrastate Medicaid pact.

:

01:27:14,758 --> 01:27:19,468

, obviously the Democratic governors

cooperating on how to resist

:

01:27:19,468 --> 01:27:21,657

ice raids and all of that stuff.

:

01:27:21,657 --> 01:27:23,638

There's already like glimmers of that.

:

01:27:24,148 --> 01:27:26,818

, The word I was using was devolution,

but that would assume that the

:

01:27:26,818 --> 01:27:28,048

federal government gave them up.

:

01:27:28,298 --> 01:27:31,178

, I don't think it's that much

more like balkanization and

:

01:27:31,178 --> 01:27:32,618

like just kind of peeling off.

:

01:27:33,018 --> 01:27:36,918

You know, slowly at first and then all

at once, most likely, from this kind

:

01:27:36,918 --> 01:27:40,608

of Federation of States, and like that

could be the worst case scenario, is

:

01:27:40,608 --> 01:27:44,058

that we wind up having essentially

secession, functional secession.

:

01:27:44,418 --> 01:27:46,728

They don't really say We're leaving

the United States, but we're

:

01:27:46,728 --> 01:27:47,928

not playing with you anymore.

:

01:27:48,588 --> 01:27:50,478

That version of things is not good.

:

01:27:50,883 --> 01:27:53,943

Uh, it is not good, but it does

also present an opportunity

:

01:27:53,943 --> 01:27:57,253

to say like, well, in order to

rebuild, what, are we rebuilding?

:

01:27:57,643 --> 01:27:59,623

Are we just like shoring up the place?

:

01:27:59,863 --> 01:28:03,313

Or are we, is this a tear down

and we should start, start

:

01:28:03,313 --> 01:28:04,423

from the ground up again?

:

01:28:04,433 --> 01:28:06,383

, And then there's a whole bunch

of scenarios along the way.

:

01:28:06,623 --> 01:28:09,113

There is time now to have this

conversation instead of just the

:

01:28:09,113 --> 01:28:11,213

hand wringing of like, are we

heading towards the civil war?

:

01:28:11,483 --> 01:28:13,193

You know, are, is the

union going to dissolve?

:

01:28:13,193 --> 01:28:14,032

Who's gonna secede?

:

01:28:14,243 --> 01:28:15,532

Like, will there be

violence in the streets?

:

01:28:15,532 --> 01:28:16,793

All of those kinds of questions.

:

01:28:17,093 --> 01:28:20,993

We could just take that one day

at a time and instead say to the

:

01:28:20,993 --> 01:28:23,393

question, you keep asking, what

is the world you want to build?

:

01:28:23,782 --> 01:28:27,952

And start now laying the groundwork

for that vision so that whenever,

:

01:28:27,952 --> 01:28:32,933

whatever, you know, precipitating event

happens, happens we're ready to go.

:

01:28:32,963 --> 01:28:36,113

Like it's already in people's ambient

awareness because people have already

:

01:28:36,113 --> 01:28:40,223

been talking about it and they have

something to turn to as opposed to

:

01:28:40,577 --> 01:28:42,497

the walking in the wilderness thing.

:

01:28:42,897 --> 01:28:44,757

Like we've been in the wilderness

now, we've been in the wilderness

:

01:28:44,757 --> 01:28:48,027

basically since Trump came down the

escalator and possibly since nine 11.

:

01:28:48,427 --> 01:28:51,257

But like, this is, why are we waiting?

:

01:28:51,307 --> 01:28:54,577

What is up with this carville

strategy of like, we're just

:

01:28:54,577 --> 01:28:58,807

gonna sit back and wait for the

lection results to come in in:

:

01:28:58,857 --> 01:29:02,337

, It seems like this is an opportunity

to go do other stuff since no

:

01:29:02,337 --> 01:29:05,097

one's actually asking any of these

elected officials to do their jobs.

:

01:29:05,457 --> 01:29:08,416

. Like they can't, even if they wanna to,

like they should do what they're doing.

:

01:29:08,416 --> 01:29:10,757

Like The showing up and

pounding, you know, their shoe

:

01:29:10,757 --> 01:29:12,257

on the desk, please do that.

:

01:29:12,527 --> 01:29:16,847

But also what's the vision and why not

go around and hold, hold town halls,

:

01:29:16,847 --> 01:29:17,837

whether you're in session or not.

:

01:29:17,937 --> 01:29:19,767

It doesn't really matter if you

show up to committee, who cares?

:

01:29:19,857 --> 01:29:20,697

They're gonna do what they want.

:

01:29:21,087 --> 01:29:22,377

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Yeah, like to some degree if,

:

01:29:22,407 --> 01:29:25,057

if one side's not going to play

by the rules, then why would we.

:

01:29:25,437 --> 01:29:25,787

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

right?

:

01:29:25,980 --> 01:29:26,200

Yes.

:

01:29:26,230 --> 01:29:27,250

What is the compulsion here?

:

01:29:27,250 --> 01:29:30,640

And I really ev like honest to God, if

someone says to me like, the problem

:

01:29:30,640 --> 01:29:32,920

with the Democrats is that they're

all straight A students who sit at the

:

01:29:32,920 --> 01:29:34,570

front of the classroom, do all that.

:

01:29:34,570 --> 01:29:37,390

You said this earlier, like viewing

this all as some sort of science

:

01:29:37,390 --> 01:29:41,770

experiment and like the voters are

specimens to be studied as opposed to

:

01:29:41,800 --> 01:29:43,900

just people who live in our community.

:

01:29:43,990 --> 01:29:45,910

Whereas Brad Lander talks

about it, our neighbors.

:

01:29:46,562 --> 01:29:49,522

The thing he says all the time about

the ice raids in New York City is , I

:

01:29:49,522 --> 01:29:53,242

won't stop going down to the courthouse

until they stop kidnapping our neighbors.

:

01:29:53,692 --> 01:29:58,492

He doesn't talk about immigrants,

he talks about our neighbors.

:

01:29:58,572 --> 01:30:03,602

We could shift every day, another

step in that direction towards , there

:

01:30:03,602 --> 01:30:07,291

is something we all want together

and that world looks like this.

:

01:30:07,352 --> 01:30:09,362

And so that's what we're building towards.

:

01:30:09,362 --> 01:30:11,762

And if you wanna build towards that,

we are the ones who are gonna do that.

:

01:30:12,122 --> 01:30:14,702

And you know, these guys don't want that.

:

01:30:14,702 --> 01:30:17,822

They wanna burn all of it

down and rule over the ashes.

:

01:30:18,452 --> 01:30:19,502

I don't think you want that.

:

01:30:19,888 --> 01:30:21,143

, And then enlist people.

:

01:30:21,143 --> 01:30:22,613

It's not, I'm condescending to you.

:

01:30:22,613 --> 01:30:23,573

I'm patting you on the head.

:

01:30:23,573 --> 01:30:24,923

I'm telling you what you wanna hear.

:

01:30:25,443 --> 01:30:27,633

I am identifying the problem very clearly.

:

01:30:27,782 --> 01:30:31,623

I can point at who the enemy

is and I can say this way, this

:

01:30:31,623 --> 01:30:33,123

way past this terrible moment.

:

01:30:33,233 --> 01:30:34,313

There's no reason to wait.

:

01:30:34,403 --> 01:30:35,273

There's just none.

:

01:30:35,603 --> 01:30:36,683

They should be doing it right now.

:

01:30:36,683 --> 01:30:39,228

Yeah, that's how, I mean,

marketing works that way.

:

01:30:39,228 --> 01:30:41,988

You don't go, you don't go

silent, you go silent, you lose.

:

01:30:42,258 --> 01:30:44,148

This, like, well, we're gonna

take all this time to prepare

:

01:30:44,538 --> 01:30:45,827

is what's driving me nuts.

:

01:30:46,068 --> 01:30:48,198

And again, I recognize

the bizarreness of this.

:

01:30:48,198 --> 01:30:48,918

I am a researcher.

:

01:30:48,918 --> 01:30:49,907

Please pay me to do research.

:

01:30:49,907 --> 01:30:52,938

But also sometimes we already

know the answer and it's just time

:

01:30:52,938 --> 01:30:54,108

to make a decision and then go,

:

01:30:54,407 --> 01:30:54,698

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Amen.

:

01:30:55,098 --> 01:30:56,488

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

okay, , I think we've gone

:

01:30:56,488 --> 01:30:58,088

long enough for today.

:

01:30:58,138 --> 01:30:58,948

Yeah, for the audience.

:

01:30:58,948 --> 01:31:02,248

The kind of idea that we had for

this, and this one is just kind of

:

01:31:02,248 --> 01:31:06,398

a, we both have been, , you know,

Lauren's been occupied elsewhere.

:

01:31:06,403 --> 01:31:09,407

I've been, cutting two by

fours, , and screwing things into

:

01:31:09,407 --> 01:31:10,878

the floor for a week and a half.

:

01:31:10,928 --> 01:31:14,438

, this is sort of a, let's get

it all out, kind of a, kind of

:

01:31:14,438 --> 01:31:18,008

a first step in, in doing this

mood swings episode once a month.

:

01:31:18,008 --> 01:31:21,848

you know, We wanna kind of demystify

some things that are part of kind

:

01:31:21,848 --> 01:31:24,938

of the political discourse or

part of how people construct their

:

01:31:24,938 --> 01:31:26,438

theories about how politics works.

:

01:31:26,648 --> 01:31:30,728

We definitely do wanna eventually talk

about fresh data that's out there about

:

01:31:30,728 --> 01:31:32,168

how people are feeling about things.

:

01:31:32,528 --> 01:31:35,407

, And I think we wanna talk about these

ideas of like, well, what's next?

:

01:31:35,407 --> 01:31:39,888

Not just taking the temperature

day to day, but , how do we get

:

01:31:39,888 --> 01:31:41,748

through here to the other side?

:

01:31:41,778 --> 01:31:45,678

We know how more or less we

got here, how do we get out is

:

01:31:45,678 --> 01:31:47,327

I think the bigger question.

:

01:31:47,728 --> 01:31:51,458

, and there's a lot of ways that

like the work you do can start to

:

01:31:51,458 --> 01:31:55,508

point us towards territory that

looks, . More fertile than others.

:

01:31:56,228 --> 01:31:58,998

So, , for those who are listening, , if

you have ideas about things that we

:

01:31:58,998 --> 01:32:01,758

should talk about or you have questions

that you would like, , particularly

:

01:32:01,818 --> 01:32:06,077

the expert here, Lauren, to, demystify

or unpack, , send us an email.

:

01:32:06,178 --> 01:32:08,668

, You can hit me@ferretcrosstabspodcast.com.

:

01:32:08,688 --> 01:32:10,188

, And we will talk about those things.

:

01:32:10,218 --> 01:32:12,638

Or you can, , message me

on blue Sky or something.

:

01:32:13,058 --> 01:32:15,098

This was a fun first out fun.

:

01:32:15,428 --> 01:32:16,388

Is it fun, the right word?

:

01:32:16,388 --> 01:32:17,558

riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

Cathartic for me.

:

01:32:17,958 --> 01:32:19,068

riverside_farrah_bostic_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0180:

It felt good for me too.

:

01:32:19,068 --> 01:32:21,827

I feel like, I feel like I can't

just rant my husband all day long.

:

01:32:21,858 --> 01:32:23,178

, I'm gonna have to rant other people.

:

01:32:23,458 --> 01:32:26,827

, What are we doing is, is gonna

be my question every time, but

:

01:32:26,827 --> 01:32:30,508

Lauren, , thank you for your time on a

Friday, , when you're in the midst of

:

01:32:30,688 --> 01:32:31,798

all the stuff you're in the midst of.

:

01:32:32,248 --> 01:32:32,748

, riverside_lauren_raw-audio_cross_tabs_0181:

you got it.

:

01:32:33,193 --> 01:32:35,683

Farrah Bostic: Crosstabs is a

production of the Difference Engine.

:

01:32:35,773 --> 01:32:37,303

It is edited and hosted by me.

:

01:32:37,363 --> 01:32:40,963

Farrah Bostick music is from

Audio Jungle by S Audio.

:

01:32:41,293 --> 01:32:45,853

You can subscribe to our weekly

newsletter for free@crosstabspodcast.com.

:

01:32:46,543 --> 01:32:50,113

You can also follow the show

on Blue sky@crosstabspod.blue

:

01:32:50,113 --> 01:32:51,013

sky.social,

:

01:32:51,073 --> 01:32:54,643

and on LinkedIn where we share links

to new episodes and newsletters.

:

01:32:55,123 --> 01:32:58,483

We also share these episodes via

video, and you can like and subscribe

:

01:32:58,483 --> 01:33:01,903

to each week's video episode on

YouTube at Crosstabs podcast.

:

01:33:02,050 --> 01:33:03,971

Please follow us on

your favorite platform.

:

01:33:03,971 --> 01:33:07,361

Tell your friends about the show, and

don't forget to subscribe on whatever your

:

01:33:07,361 --> 01:33:09,191

favorite podcast service happens to be.

:

01:33:09,641 --> 01:33:12,611

If you wanna learn more about what

I do, you can find me on all the

:

01:33:12,611 --> 01:33:16,001

socials at Fara Bostic, though I

am mostly on Blue Sky these days.

:

01:33:16,031 --> 01:33:18,611

Or get in touch through

the difference engine.co.

:

01:33:19,091 --> 01:33:19,751

And that's it.

:

01:33:19,841 --> 01:33:20,591

See you next time.

Follow

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube