Artwork for podcast NextGen Work Culture: HR, Management, Inclusive Parent-Friendly Work Environment, Employee Recruitment and Retention, Talent Development
The Expensive Consequences When Companies Fail Working Parents
Episode 3528th August 2024 • NextGen Work Culture: HR, Management, Inclusive Parent-Friendly Work Environment, Employee Recruitment and Retention, Talent Development • Kortney Ross
00:00:00 00:10:08

Share Episode

Shownotes

Host Kortney Ross dives deep into the significant costs businesses face when they lack proper support structures for working parents, particularly those dealing with pregnancy and lactation-related issues. Kortney highlights startling statistics and shares real-world examples to illustrate just how much organizations can lose—both financially and in terms of talent retention—when they fail to provide necessary accommodations. She also emphasizes the importance of awareness and training, especially with the implementation of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. If you're keen on building a family-friendly, future-ready workplace, this episode is a must-listen.

Connect with us at:

KortneyRoss.com

LinkedIn: @kortneyross

Instagram: @nextgenworkculture

Facebook: @nextgenworkculture

Transcripts

Speaker:

Welcome to the NextGen Work Culture podcast, where leaders learn

Speaker:

to support working parents. Because being a family friendly

Speaker:

business isn't just a nice to have anymore. It's

Speaker:

essential for businesses that want to stay competitive, and it is

Speaker:

critical for the next generation and those who are raising them. I'm

Speaker:

your host, Courtney Ross, and I am so glad that you're here.

Speaker:

Welcome back to the NextGen work culture. We're

Speaker:

coming at you with a solo episode today. I want to

Speaker:

talk about how much it can cost an

Speaker:

organization if they don't have

Speaker:

support in place for working parents. Specifically, we're

Speaker:

going to talk about pregnancy and lactation related

Speaker:

issues. So let's pretend that

Speaker:

a company has about 40

Speaker:

employees working for them, 40 female employees.

Speaker:

The statistics show that about 30 of them are going to

Speaker:

become pregnant during their career. And

Speaker:

if you don't have good support structures in

Speaker:

place, chances are about

Speaker:

six of those original 40 are going to leave. Because around

Speaker:

20% of women quit work just

Speaker:

before or shortly after giving birth. The cost

Speaker:

of replacing each of those employees is probably going to cost about

Speaker:

six to nine months of their salary. So let's say

Speaker:

for easy math that each of them makes $100,000 a year.

Speaker:

That means it's going to cost at least $50,000 to

Speaker:

replace each one of those six employees that left

Speaker:

just because they weren't feeling supported during or after their

Speaker:

pregnancy. Now, multiply that by six and you've got about

Speaker:

$300,000 just in the cost to

Speaker:

replace these employees that you've lost.

Speaker:

And if one of them left because they felt that they were being

Speaker:

discriminated against during their pregnancy, and they file a pregnancy

Speaker:

discrimination claim, the average cost of those, if

Speaker:

you settle outside of court, is about

Speaker:

$18,000. So those

Speaker:

costs added up really quickly for a relatively small

Speaker:

organization of just about 40 female employees.

Speaker:

Now, let's say that you're a much larger company

Speaker:

with about 1000 female employees.

Speaker:

That math is going to really add up, because out of

Speaker:

those 1000 employees, 75% of them, or about

Speaker:

750, are going to become pregnant at some time during their

Speaker:

career. And that's going to cost over seven and a half

Speaker:

million dollars in recruiting and training new

Speaker:

employees to replace the all of the pregnant women

Speaker:

who are leaving either shortly before or shortly

Speaker:

after they give birth. So

Speaker:

why is this important? Why should we be

Speaker:

caring about supporting pregnant employees in the workforce?

Speaker:

Well, times have changed significantly. In the early

Speaker:

1960s, only about 44% of women

Speaker:

worked at all during their pregnancy. But

Speaker:

in the early two thousands, that went up to about

Speaker:

66% of mothers who gave birth to their first child between

Speaker:

2006 and 2000, 866 percent of those

Speaker:

moms were working during their pregnancy. And in the early

Speaker:

1960s, only about 35% of women

Speaker:

actually worked up to that 9th month of pregnancy, and

Speaker:

82% worked into the final month

Speaker:

in the early two thousands. That's a pretty big difference.

Speaker:

So now we have up to 82% of women

Speaker:

working up to or very near their due dates while

Speaker:

they are pregnant. And that was just not happening

Speaker:

40, 50, 60 years ago. So now we have the

Speaker:

pregnant Workers Fairness act in place. We have the pregnancy

Speaker:

Discrimination act. We have some laws that are supposed to help

Speaker:

ensure that women are getting the support that they need at work,

Speaker:

that they're not being discriminated against, that they're getting the accommodations that they

Speaker:

need. But we still have a lot of organizations that just aren't

Speaker:

quite getting it right. But times have

Speaker:

changed. We have a lot of women who are breadwinners or

Speaker:

are single parents. And our workplaces

Speaker:

really have got to catch up to

Speaker:

the new norm. And it's not even new. It's been

Speaker:

around for decades now. It's just time that we got up.

Speaker:

Let's think about a couple of examples of

Speaker:

when it could really cost you if you don't have this sort

Speaker:

of support or accommodations routines in

Speaker:

place in 2020. There

Speaker:

was a very large food processing plant, Purdue,

Speaker:

who told a pregnant employee that she

Speaker:

was not going to be able to keep water nearby and have extra

Speaker:

restroom breaks when she came back to work. She had a high risk

Speaker:

pregnancy. She was coming back off of

Speaker:

having an infection, and those were the bare minimum things she needed just to be

Speaker:

able to do her job. She needed extra water, and she needed to go to

Speaker:

the bathroom more often. And an HR manager told her that that

Speaker:

wasn't going to be possible, that she needed to take leave

Speaker:

and apply for short term disability, which she

Speaker:

did, but she was still eventually fired, and they cited that her

Speaker:

extended absence was the reason. Of course, she got

Speaker:

very upset about this, as she should have, and she filed a suit

Speaker:

claiming discrimination due to sex, pregnancy, and

Speaker:

disability. Poor Duke settled out of court. So I don't know

Speaker:

the exact cost of this litigation, but I'm sure

Speaker:

it was a lot. And this was before the pregnant workers

Speaker:

Fairness act. Now, under the

Speaker:

PWFA, we have some

Speaker:

accommodations that just must be done every time they're asked for. These are

Speaker:

called predictable assessments. And those predictable assessments are

Speaker:

the right to carry or keep drinking water nearby, have extra

Speaker:

bathroom breaks, sit or stand, the opposite of what may

Speaker:

be normal for the job and have extra breaks for eating and

Speaker:

drinking. So that would have been a clear cut case under

Speaker:

the Pregnant Workers Fairness act, that this woman absolutely

Speaker:

should have been given those accommodations. But one manager told her

Speaker:

no, and that cost the company a lot of money to file

Speaker:

outside of court. Earlier this year, in 2024,

Speaker:

Walmart also had some problems where a

Speaker:

manager told a female employee that she was

Speaker:

not promoted just because she was a mother with young children. And this isn't

Speaker:

exactly related to pregnancy. But of course, she had gone through

Speaker:

a couple of pregnancies to get to those children. Probably. But

Speaker:

this is just an example where one manager cost the

Speaker:

company a lot, and I think we're going to run into that problem

Speaker:

very frequently with the Pregnant Workers Fairness act. The EEOC

Speaker:

even specifically states that managers must

Speaker:

be trained to be able

Speaker:

to recognize accommodation requests, which may be a simple conversation

Speaker:

or even something like a text message from an employee. And

Speaker:

they must be trained to act on those requests quickly.

Speaker:

So they need to know the predictable assessments. They need to know what to do

Speaker:

if a pregnant employee asks for accommodations, and they need to

Speaker:

know how to do it quickly, they have to be empowered to do it themselves

Speaker:

without going through a bunch of hoops and loops and jumps and

Speaker:

paperworks and forms or third party

Speaker:

providers like that is just not going to be acceptable under the Pregnant

Speaker:

Workers Fairness act. So it's super important

Speaker:

that companies train their managers

Speaker:

on this new law that they understand they have

Speaker:

to give accommodations and that they have to support

Speaker:

women or employees during their pregnancy and

Speaker:

after, during the phases of lactation or maybe

Speaker:

postpartum depression or other issues come up. That's all

Speaker:

covered under the Pregnant Workers Fairness act, and it can really cost the company

Speaker:

a lot of money if they're not doing this.

Speaker:

The settlement for that Walmart case

Speaker:

that I mentioned, where one manager messed up,

Speaker:

told an employee that she wasn't promoted

Speaker:

just because of her children. The cost of that was

Speaker:

$60,000 in settlement fines, plus, I'm sure, an

Speaker:

additional corpath costs, and they had to promise to train all

Speaker:

of their managers. And that wasn't even a claim under the

Speaker:

Pregnant Workers Fairness act. That was just a discrimination claim. The Pregnant Workers

Speaker:

Fairness act, we are going to start seeing claims that are going to cost

Speaker:

companies a lot of money when most of it is going to

Speaker:

boil down to one manager was asked by one

Speaker:

employee for a relatively

Speaker:

simple and short term accommodation.

Speaker:

So if your managers don't know about this, they absolutely need to.

Speaker:

And if you need some help training them, you could check out

Speaker:

courtneyross.com leadershiptraining to learn more about

Speaker:

the programs that I offer to help, be sure that all of the

Speaker:

frontline managers understand how to comply with this new law, because it's

Speaker:

super important and it can cost your organization a lot of money if you

Speaker:

don't do it. So go check it out.

Speaker:

If you enjoyed this episode, I know you'll love the future ready work

Speaker:

culture framework. Head over to courtneyross.com

Speaker:

framework to download your copy and start building a family

Speaker:

friendly, future ready workplace today. Don't

Speaker:

forget to subscribe to the NextGen work culture so you never miss an

Speaker:

episode. I'd love it if you'd also take a moment to leave a

Speaker:

review. Until next time, take care.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube