Everyone "knows" that knees going inwards in a squat is bad, right?
It means the glutes are weak or underactive, and it's not good for the knee.
But is it REALLY?
This episode is a deep dive into the biomechanical, epidemiological, and prospective research on knee alignment during squatting, jumping, running and hopping. Our goal is to answer 2 questions:
Links:
Mentioned in this episode:
Done-for-you client acquisition:
WEBVTT
::Most of us were taught that if a client's knees go inward as they squat or lunge,
::that means two things, weak glutes and they're increasing the injury risk to the knee.
::And because of those things, most of us have been taught and probably still
::do, Q, knees out during a lunge or squat, or at least knees not in.
::And I taught that for years. I've had my hands on the outside of a client's
::knees, ask them to push outwards into my hands as they squatted probably hundreds of times.
::But a deeper look into the literature actually reveals some very surprising
::things and so I'm going to test both of those claims,
::in this episode and walk you through the literature and by those two claims
::what I mean is number one knees in during a squat or lunge does that indicate
::weak glutes and number two is it dangerous for the knee all right so,
::the reason I started doubting this in the first place, if your knees go in,
::that indicates weak glutes,
::is that some of the strongest squatters on earth do that exact thing.
::Go to YouTube and type in Olympic weightlifting or powerlifting and you will see.
::Elite strength athletes, some of the best people on the planet,
::stand up out of a deep squat with a barbell that can be double or in some cases
::triple their body weight and with,
::a lot, like a substantial fraction, somewhere around half I would say,
::of elite lifters, their knees are.
::Obviously move inwards quite a significant distance as they stand up from a deep squat.
::And so if somebody is squatting two to three times their body weight and their knees go in.
::It's really hard for me to believe that that's caused by weak glutes.
::So something else is probably going on now. This is an observation. It's not proof.
::But that is what made me look closer at this question, and it's not the answer,
::but it's what prompted me to really deep dive into this.
::Now, I can hear what some of you are probably thinking, which is that,
::well, that's just compensation. When your knees go in under extreme heavy load,
::that's form breaking down under a load that's too heavy. And hold that thought.
::I want to bookmark that, and I want to come back to it a little bit later in
::the episode, because I think that's exactly backwards. And I think it's the
::most interesting thing in this episode. So just hold on to that thought about
::the compensation. All right.
::Before of the rest of this episode, though, will make sense,
::we need to agree on a couple of pieces of,
::anatomy and biomechanics, which is which muscles are primarily responsible for
::lifting you up out of the bottom of a squat.
::And I'm going to just say squat in this episode, but really it's any combined
::hip extension, knee extension movement.
::So that could be a squat, it could be a deadlift, which might not be a powerlifting
::competition move, it might be just lifting, shopping up off the floor,
::which is combined hip extension plus knee extension.
::Might be a lunge, it might be a split squat.
::There are myriad movements and formal fitness exercises that involve a combination
::of hip extension, knee extension.
::And so I'm just going to say the word squat, so I don't have to list all of
::the exercises every time. All right, but this applies to all of the above.
::All right, so which muscles lift you up out of the bottom of a deep squat, out of a squat?
::So as you stand up out of a squat or lunge, you're doing hip extension and knee extension.
::So the main muscles that are loaded, the main muscles that produce the primary
::force are the hip extensors and the knee extensors.
::Now, in a deep squat, especially below 90 degrees of knee flexion,
::so when your hip is below your knee, the main hip extensors.
::Are the glute max, gluteus maximus, and the adductor magnus,
::which is the largest of the adductor muscles.
::Now, I was taught in my original Pilates training, and probably you were taught
::in your original Pilates training, that the hip extensors are the glutes and hamstrings.
::And that is kind of true in that the, well, the glutes are hip extensors, that is 100% true.
::The hamstrings are hip extensors.
::They originate on the ischial tuberosity, which is posterior to the axis of
::rotation of the hip joint, so far so good.
::However, the hamstrings are all two joint muscles. They're both hip extensors and knee flexors.
::And during a standing up out of a squat, you are extending the hip and flexing,
::I'm sorry, extending the knee as well. You're extending the hip and extending the knee.
::Now, hamstrings are hip extensors and they're knee flexors. So as you stand
::up out of a squat, the hamstrings are shortening over the hip joint,
::but they're lengthening over the knee joint.
::And a couple of studies have actually examined what happens to the hamstrings
::during a squat and found that they don't change length. They essentially stay
::the same length throughout the squat movement.
::And I've done a couple of video posts on this, just showing a little flex band
::demonstration of the skeleton.
::It's a very simple demonstration to do that as the hip extends and the knee,
::extends, the distance between the ischial tuberosity and the tibial plateau
::stays pretty much the same. So the hamstrings work isometrically in a squat.
::And a squat is actually a very poor hamstring exercise for this reason.
::The hamstrings aren't primary force producers in a squat. They act isometrically.
::Their primary function is thought to be stabilization of the knee.
::They're synergists with the ACL. They prevent anterior shear of the tibia relative
::to the femur, and they also laterally and rotationally stabilize the knee along with the quadriceps.
::So in a deep squat, the main hip extensors do not include the hamstrings.
::Squats, lunges, all of those types of hip extension, knee extension moves are
::not great hamstring exercises. To work the hamstrings effectively,
::now of course hamstrings are active during these movements, but they're not
::the primary mover, so they're not under massive load.
::And so to work the hamstrings effectively, you need to isolate either the hip
::or the knee. So you need to do isolated knee flexion or isolated hip extension
::with the knee held constant.
::But in a squat, the hamstrings are isometric. So the main hip extensors as you
::stand up out of a squat, especially a deep squat below 90 degrees,
::are gluteus maximus and the adductor magnus.
::Not the hamstrings. All right.
::So one more detail that matters is that the gluteus maximus has both upper and lower fibres.
::So it has the iliac fibers, the fibers that attach to the crest of the pelvis,
::and it has the sacral fibers, the fibers that attach to the sacrum.
::Iliac fibers are the upper fibers, sacral fibers are the lower fibers.
::And,
::the upper fibers, especially, I mean all of the fibers, but especially the upper
::fibers, are a powerful lateral rotator of the hip.
::And when your hips are flexed,
::lateral rotation is the action that pushes the hip outwards.
::It's not actually true abduction. So if you think about you're squatting down,
::you're at the bottom of a squat, if you push your knees out,
::it is not true abduction, it is hip lateral rotation that you're doing,
::combined with abduction. So when you move your knees out in a squat,
::it's the gluteus maximus amongst
::the other hip lateral rotators that is primarily responsible for that.
::So if the knees go in, it's internal rotation. If the knees go in,
::sorry, it's internal rotation.
::All right, so...
::In 2012, a.
::Study by Braynton and colleagues in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning
::Research found that knee extensor effort, or in other words,
::the quadriceps, goes up as you go deeper into a squat.
::So if you go halfway into a squat and then you go deeper and deeper into a squat,
::the quads work more the deeper you go.
::Whereas with hip extensors so the gluteus maximus and the adductor magnus that is also true.
::And with hip extensors as you add more load,
::hip extensor load goes up whereas as you add more load the quad load doesn't
::go up so you can do body weight squats and as long as you do them deep your
::quads will be very close to maximally loaded as long as you do enough reps.
::Whereas with glutes and adductor magnus, you're going to load them more effectively
::by going deep, but also they are more and more active and there's more load on them as you add,
::more external load to the movement.
::So a heavily loaded deep squat is going to bias to glutes and adductor magnus,
::whereas a lightly loaded squat is going to bias more to quadriceps.
::Now, both movements will involve all of those muscles, but the load shifts where
::the external load influences where the internal load is born.
::All right, so if you want to load the quads, just go deeper.
::If you want to load the glutes and adductor magnus, go deeper and heavier.
::All right, so this is the 2024 study that really was, as far as I'm aware,
::the first bit of evidence to really look at knees going in and how that impacts hip and knee talk.
::So this is Lauren Chu, 2024, the General Strength and Conditioning Research.
::They had 32 people, 18 women, 14 men, squatting with a loaded barbell three different ways.
::So they squatted in their natural way with no instruction.
::So they just said squat, and then they deliberately cued them to squat with
::their knees in, and then they deliberately cued them to squat with their knees
::out. So three different ways, just no cue, then knees in, then knees out.
::And they had a force plate underneath their feet, so measuring how much ground
::reaction force, how hard they were pushing into the ground, plus motion capture,
::to calculate the moments, the forces, at the hip and knee.
::And what Lauren Chu found, that the knees-in squats produced.
::Smaller hip extensor forces, smaller adductor forces, and larger hip lateral
::rotator forces than normal squats.
::So knees-in produced larger hip lateral rotator forces than normal squats.
::And these were not just statistically significant, they were large enough to
::actually matter in practice.
::And so just thinking about that in the context of the anatomy we just talked through is that,
::that combination of knees in deep squat biases the load towards the iliac fibers of the glute max,
::or really all of the fibers, but it's particularly the iliac fibers of the glute
::max and away from the adductor magnus.
::So as you go into a deep, heavily loaded squat, you're increasing load on the hip extensors.
::As your knees go in...
::You decrease load on hip extensors, increase load on hip lateral rotators.
::Now, adductor madness is a hip extensor, so you're decreasing the load on that as your knees go in.
::Glute max is a hip extensor and a lateral rotator.
::So as you decrease load on hip extensors and increase load on lateral rotators,
::you actually don't decrease total load on the glutes, okay, because the load has to go somewhere.
::And because as you decrease load on the adductor magnus and increase load on
::the lateral rotators, well, that load just shifts more to the glute max.
::So you're shifting load essentially away from adductor magnus and towards glute
::max. And what they found with the knees out condition was the inverse.
::So as you squat with your knees out, you decrease load on the external rotators
::and increase the load on the adductors. So knees out actually biases towards adductor magnus.
::Because think, knees out in a squat, as you stand up and straighten your legs, your knees adduct.
::So you're using your adductors to stand up. Whereas if you start at the bottom
::of the squat with your knees in, as you stand up, your knees,
::your legs straighten, your knees abduct.
::So you're working your abductors, or in this case, it's actually the lateral
::rotators that are doing that action.
::Okay, so that study really contradicts the folk wisdom that knees going in during
::a squat indicates weak glutes.
::In fact, it loads the glutes more, knees going in in a squat,
::according to this study.
::And why would we want to load the glutes more? Well, why would people unconsciously
::squat with their knees in and load the glutes more? well, if the glutes are
::stronger and you wanted to produce more power,
::that would do it. You would become more powerful, you'd produce more force.
::A couple of other things, this is back from the 2022 episode,
::and so this is more speculation, that as your knees go in, you might be pre-stretching,
::the glute max to produce more force.
::Just like when you throw, you know, you automatically draw your hand backwards
::beforehand, or when you go to jump up, you automatically kind of squat down
::a little bit first. We pre-stretch the muscles to produce more force.
::We might be doing that on the way up out of a squat with the knees go in.
::All right. So now, I'm not telling you to cue everyone knees in in a deep squat.
::Quite the contrary, I think you should actually stop cueing knee position at
::all, except in very specific situations that I'll come to later.
::Neither in nor out, just don't cue knee position.
::All right, so deep-bladed squats and lunges, load the glutes in,
::Dr. Magnus, very effectively.
::You don't need to cue any kind of knee position to load the glutes,
::just load the movement deep and heavy, and you will effectively target all of those muscles.
::All right. So that is the literature I found on muscle recruitment and loading with regard to knees in.
::So the only evidence we have points to knees going in, actually loading the
::glutes more, not being a sign of quite weak or lazy glutes.
::All right. Next idea is, and this is one that really surprised me.
::In the sport with the heaviest squats on earth, powerlifting,
::almost nobody has measured knee position in the frontal plane.
::That's side-to-side movement of the knees.
::When I went looking for research on elite powerlifters and weightlifters,
::there's a lot of it, and it is good in terms of biomechanical research.
::So Pertzer and colleagues, 2026 in scientific reports, put 29 national and international
::powerlifters through 3D motion capture, squatting at 70% to 90% of their backs.
::And they found that as the load goes up, the hip takes more and more of the
::work while the knees and ankles maintain the flat work rate.
::So that just mirrors what I said before, which is that as you add load to a
::squat, the hip extensors are preferentially loaded more, like proportionately,
::they take more of the load.
::Uh, Rettenberg in way back in 1996, found that weightlifters and powerlifters
::split the load differently. Weightlifters share between hip and knee pretty
::equally, whereas powerlifters are more hip dominant.
::And that is to do with where I think where the, where they hold the bar on their
::back. So powerlifters tend to hold the barbell lower on their back.
::So the center of mass is lower. So they do more of a torso lean in their squats.
::Whereas weightlifters tend to hold the bar higher on their back.
::So they stay more upright as the center of mass is higher.
::But here's the thing, almost all of the research on weightlifters and powerlifters
::and biomechanics of the knees and hips and torso,
::is in the sagittal plane, which means they look from the side and they look,
::at knee and hip and spine and ankle flexion extension.
::There's essentially no research looking at frontal plane movement biomechanics
::in powerlifters and weightlifters. So in other words, leg valgus or knee valgus,
::the knees going in or out during a squat.
::That research essentially hasn't been done. Now, there are several studies I
::found that collected 3D data on elite lifters,
::but all of those studies only published flexion and extension moments.
::Sideways knee movement, the thing that we're talking about today in this episode,
::And the thing that we typically cue most with relation to safety just is basically
::unmeasured and unreported in this study.
::And the closest study I found is Lati and colleagues, 2018, in the Scandinavian
::Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports.
::And they did report frontal plane knee movement. So in other words,
::abduction, adduction, or knee moving in or outwards, in a loaded barbell squat
::in a wide versus a narrow stance.
::But they reported knee lateral movement lateral medial movement,
::as a consequence of how wide you stand, not a fault to be corrected.
::So just think about it, like if you squat with a very, very narrow stance,
::like your feet almost touching together, your knees almost go straight forwards,
::right? So there's very little lateral movement, you know, medial or lateral
::movement of the knees as you go up or down.
::Whereas if you stand with your feet, you know, one and a half times shoulder
::width apart and your legs turned out, as you squat down, your knees move laterally,
::and as you stand up, your knees move medially.
::Even if your knees don't go into any kind of valgus, just because you're standing
::in a wider stance, your knees move a little more laterally. So that's what they
::looked at. They didn't actually look at valgus. Yeah.
::All right, so the final study I found in relation to this on powerlifters was
::a group called PERD CELL in 2025.
::They estimated that at 90%.
::Of their max, elite powerlifters generate peak joint contact forces,
::of over 23 times body weight at the knee joint and nearly 27 times body weight
::at the patellofemoral joint, the kneecap, the joint between the patella and the femur.
::And so those forces are massive. And if you just go look on YouTube and type
::in like powerlifting squat world record, that kind of thing.
::You will see that elite powerlifters frequently, I would estimate roughly half
::of elite powerlifters have extremely visible knee valgus as they stand up out of heavy squats.
::And these people have, according to Pertzel, 23 times body weight going through
::each knee, each knee, and they're doing valgus.
::And these people have done thousands of reps of squats. To be able to squat
::triple your body weight, you have to do thousands of reps over a large number
::of years in order to become that strong.
::And so that doesn't seem to be hurting their knees.
::Now, don't have research on that, but seems fairly logical to me. All right.
::Now, with that in mind, let's come
::back to the thought I mentioned earlier that knees go in at 90% of max.
::And so that that is a compensation. That's form breaking down under too much load.
::And I want to take that apart because one of the things that on the surface
::seems eminently sensible, but the closer you look at it, the less it makes sense.
::So start with the word compensation. That's not a description of what happens.
::That's a judgment about why it happened.
::The neutral description of the knee moved inwards would be, simply to say,
::the knee moved inwards. That describes what happened.
::Compensation is a story about why the knee moved inwards.
::I think this is a culturally constructed meaning. It's not based on what we
::know about biomechanics.
::So we have a notion of ideal form that, in my opinion, is largely aesthetic.
::If you think of ideal form in pretty much any movement,
::we think of straight lines, even curves, smooth movement, symmetry.
::So we teach that. Now, there's nothing wrong with any of those things.
::But liking how a movement looks is not the same as knowing that it's safer or more efficient.
::Now let's bring load into the picture. At low load,
::we have lots of movement options. At high loads, we have very few options.
::Think about it. If you lift a pen off the floor, there's a million ways you could do it.
::You could have your arms straight or bent. You could use just two fingers or your whole fist.
::You could hold it close to your body or far away.
::You could bend your back or your knee or your hip or lift your heels off the
::floor there are so many ways you could lift that pen,
::whereas to lift a 30 kilogram or 66 pound dumbbell off the floor you'd have
::a lot fewer options you'd have to use a power grip like put your whole fist
::around the handle and grip it hard,
::you'd have to hold it close to your body you wouldn't be able to hold it with
::your elbow straight at arm's length.
::You'd have to get your back and hips involved.
::As the load increases in any movement, you have fewer and fewer options about how to do the movement.
::When you are squatting one and a half times your body weight,
::you can't.
::You have a lot fewer options about how to consciously arrange your body.
::You just have to use whatever works best, what allows you to produce the most
::force to do that movement.
::So when we're practicing low-load movements, like squatting with a PVC pipe
::on your back, like they do at CrossFit.
::I've seen this happen a fair bit at CrossFit, where they practice squatting
::or Olympic lifting usually with a PVC pipe.
::It's basically the same shape as a barbell, but weighs essentially nothing, like a broomstick.
::Well, in that situation, you can squat a thousand different ways.
::And so when we do it in Pilates with no external load apart from the body weight,
::you can squat or lunge a thousand different ways.
::Knees in, knees out, back bent, back straight, arms up, arms down,
::hip distance apart with your feet, shoulder distance, double shoulder distance,
::feet together. There's so many ways you could do it.
::So at low load, your movement is barely constrained by the task at all.
::You've got enormous freedom. We can generally achieve something that looks similar
::to our aesthetic ideal of smooth, symmetrical movement with straight lines and even curves.
::Now, put 90% of your one rep max on your back.
::How many ways can you complete that lift? Well, almost none.
::The task has now, the load has constrained your options.
::There's a very small set of movement solutions that will get that bar up,
::and if you don't find one of them you don't get to complete the lift so under
::a very heavy load like that and powerlifting research does show this.
::Your nervous system finds a solution it arranges your limb positions etc and
::your timing to produce the force required and if you lift the load then by definition,
::that solution that strategy worked it produced enough force,
::now we do see that power lifters as load increases they converge on a more similar
::set of timing between hip and knee and spine extension,
::okay so they might do different a much more varied set of timings under low
::low but as high as load increases we see the time is converged now they're not
::identical but they do converge quite substantially.
::So if your technique changes as you go heavier,
::is that truly a compensation or are we just abandoning the artificially imposed,
::notion of ideal form that we
::can afford when we're doing a light load because we have so many options?
::Whereas when we're lifting a heavy load, we actually have to do it the most efficient way.
::And so your nervous system, your primator cortex, your spinal cord,
::et cetera, just says, okay, well, I'm just going to take over here because you're
::obviously doing it wrong with your idea of keeping everything straight and neutral
::and smooth and everything.
::And I'm just going to arrange the body and engage the muscles in such a way
::to produce the maximum force.
::So is it a compensation? Because compensation implies there's a weakness in
::one area, so we engage a different area to make up for it. where another way
::of stating the exact same strategy is you engage the areas that are able to
::produce the most force, the most efficiently.
::And at 90% of your max, there isn't a better option available.
::That's the whole point of lifting close to your maximum, which means the thing
::we call form breaking down or compensation might be closer to the opposite.
::It might be your best form, the form that lets you produce the most force.
::And now flip it around because this is the bit that changed my mind if low load
::lets you move a thousand different ways and high load lets you move almost one
::way then which of those ways is the arbitrary way.
::The form we teach with no load or body weight is a choice we picked it it's
::like dance you can dance five ten fifty a hundred different ways and some of
::them are more aesthetically pleasing than others.
::We picked it not because it's forced on us by the task, but because at that
::load, nothing is forced on us. The form that shows up at 90% of your maximum
::is not an aesthetic ideal.
::It's the biomechanical imperative that we have to move in that certain way if
::we're going to complete the task. So, I.
::Just want to add in one last little caveat on this, which is I don't want to overstate this.
::Now, because everybody has different limb length segment, some people's femurs
::are longer or shorter relative to their tibias. We have different joint surface
::angles. We have different hip socket angles and depths and different femoral neck angles, et cetera.
::We have different muscle insertion points. We have different relative strengths
::of different muscles in our body.
::A taller person bending over to pick up something will have to bend more than a shorter person.
::So there is no one ideal form for everybody.
::But each of us, given our unique set of limb length ratios, muscle insertions, etc.,
::we'll have some ideal, our own version of ideal form for a given movement,
::picking something up from a given height at a certain load.
::But the best alignment for producing force on this rep is not necessarily the
::same thing that has the best for your knees in 20 years.
::And these are separate questions, and I don't want to blur those two questions.
::But what I'd say is that nobody has shown that it's harmful either.
::In fact, the evidence we do have shows no harm. And one more thing worth knowing.
::Um, Cholawicki et al measured national class powerlifters, uh,
::back in the early 1990s, 1990, 1991, something. And he found large variability
::in how they loaded their joints.
::Um, and so there's no one ideal form even amongst the very best. All right.
::So that's joint loading. Now I want to move on to the, to the,
::the specifically to knee injury and most common knee injury being,
::uh, anterior cruciate ligament injury.
::And that is the injury, the knee injury, that is most commonly associated with
::knee valgus or knees going in.
::And so, yeah, this is the part where I don't want to leave you thinking that
::knee position never matters. There is a situation where it does.
::All right. So a systematic review by Gopinath and colleagues in 2024 in the
::Journal of Arthroscopy pulled 13 video analysis studies covering 542 athletes, mostly in soccer.
::And then they fell and they looked at the moment, the instant,
::because soccer is televised, and they looked at the instant when people injured their ACL.
::They actually froze the frame and looked at what was the position of the hip,
::the knee, the ankle, the torso in the instant when the ACL was injured.
::And they pulled 13 studies covering over 500 athletes and they found that the
::knee was in valgus, so in other words, knee was inwards, in about 77% of those injuries.
::So knee valgus does have an association with, in the moment,
::of ACL injuries. It seems to be the position in which the ACL is injured. But here's the part.
::That actually doesn't add up with that.
::Researchers have tried to use knee valgus in squats and jumps and things to
::predict who will get injured, and that has not worked.
::So a meta-analysis by Kronstrom et al. in 2020 in the BMC musculoskeletal disorders,
::they pulled nine prospective studies.
::So those studies where they looked at people doing depth jumps,
::so basically they'd stand on a box and they'd jump down and they look at how
::much their knees go in when they land.
::And then they follow those people over the next year and they see like who gets
::an ACL injury and who doesn't.
::And what they found was there was essentially no correlation between knee abduction
::angle, so that's how much valgus they had,
::or peak knee abduction moment, so the force, the knee valgus moment,
::neither of those things had any correlation with future ACL injury.
::So when you jump off a box and land.
::With high impact, okay, there's no correlation with whether or how much your
::knees go in and subsequent ACL injury.
::Cross Hogg and Ed Al in 2016 in the American General Sports Medicine followed
::710 elite female soccer players,
::and they concluded that the drop-jump test, the one I just described jumping
::off a box, cannot predict ACL injuries.
::So valgus is, that's the knee going in, is part of the injury picture.
::It's present in 77% of the moment of injury, but it's not useful as a screening test.
::So both of those things are true. In fact, when I look deeper into the ACL injury
::literature, looking at the mechanism, like the instant of injury,
::anterior tibial shear, so the tibia sliding forwards relative to the femur,
::so the tibia is the shin bone, the femur is the thigh bone, is the primary component of ACL injuries.
::And there are researchers who think valgus in ACL injuries happens in the milliseconds.
::After ACL rupture, not before.
::So that the valgus might be a result of the injury, not a cause of the injury.
::Now, this is still not what I would call settled science, but it is intriguing.
::Now, the loading matters here very much.
::An ACL tear is a high-speed, high-force, multi-planar event that unfolds in about 40 milliseconds.
::A bodyweight squat or lunge on a reformer is not that on any axis.
::So at the loads and speeds we work at in a studio, and in fact,
::even during a three times body weight squat in powerlifting,
::a knee that moves inwards is not any kind of danger.
::It's not a safety problem that needs to be corrected.
::Cueing knees out probably does have a place in ACL rehab, in hopping and cutting.
::And I'm sorry, I can't remember the name of the research, but I did find a paper that found that.
::Where drop jump, knee valgus wasn't associated with subsequent ACL injury,
::actually knee valgus during cutting and vertical hopping was.
::So cutting is where basically an athlete changes directions,
::like rotates on one, like you It basically turns left or right whilst running fast.
::So you're running and then you pivot to the left or pivot to the right,
::and that is called cutting.
::And so knee valgus during that high-speed running change of direction does predict ACL injury.
::So if you're rehabbing ACLs or you're preparing athletes to prevent ACL injuries,
::cueing knees out during cutting probably is valuable.
::And cueing knees out during hopping, although hopping is not really a thing
::athletes do, but if hopping is a core part of ACL rehab,
::and so cueing knees out during hopping probably is something that is valuable
::and that I will continue to do at this point for ACL rehab or prehab, you know, prevention.
::All right. So in conclusion, a knee leaning in...
::You know, looks like weakness because we've been culturally conditioned,
::essentially, educated that that's the case with words like collapse, compensation.
::The force literature, however, says that it just may be the glutes doing more,
::not less, as that happens.
::And in the sport where it would matter most, powerlifting and Olympic weightlifting,
::almost nobody has ever bothered to measure it. They don't even worry about it.
::It's just a common thing that happens. Half of athletes do it.
::And the thing we call form breaking down under load may be the closest thing
::to true ideal form for that person in that moment because it's the only form the task allowed.
::A lot of what we're taught in Pilates school and on social media and weekend
::workshops encourages us to look at the body and decide which part is failing
::or compensating under the assumption that there is such a thing as universal ideal form.
::Usually, we cannot see that from the outside. And sometimes what we're calling
::a failure, compensation or
::weakness or limitation, is the body solving the problem most efficiently.
::We can't see people's relative limb segments very easily. We can't see their
::limb segment lengths very easily. We can't see their muscle attachments.
::We don't know the proportion of fast versus slow twitch fibers in each of their
::muscles. And so we can't look at somebody and know their ideal form for a given movement.
::Their nervous system does have all of that information though and can decide that.
::What we can do is understand the basic biomechanics load and movement well and
::coach the outcome of the movement rather than a specific alignment.
::All right. I hope you found this at least interesting.
::I'm going to put a bunch of those studies link in the show notes.
::And if you like this episode and you like reading books,
::check out my book on amazon it's called strengthen the person not just the body
::part and it is about using science to rehabilitate or prehabilitate pretty much any injury,
::all right thanks dear listener much love and i'll see you in the next one.