Artwork for podcast Pilates Elephants
365. Why you should stop cueing knee alignment
Episode 36512th July 2026 • Pilates Elephants • Raphael Bender
00:00:00 00:40:52

Share Episode

Shownotes

Everyone "knows" that knees going inwards in a squat is bad, right?

It means the glutes are weak or underactive, and it's not good for the knee.

But is it REALLY?

This episode is a deep dive into the biomechanical, epidemiological, and prospective research on knee alignment during squatting, jumping, running and hopping. Our goal is to answer 2 questions:

  1. Does the knee going inwards indicate weak glutes?
  2. Is the knee going inwards dangerous?

Links:

  • Knees going in during a squat shifts load toward the glute max here
  • Knee extensor effort rises with squat depth, hip extensor effort rises with load here
  • Same depth-versus-load split found again in a separate study here
  • In elite powerlifters, heavier loads shift the work from knee to hip here
  • Elite powerlifters hit ~23x bodyweight at the knee joint at 90% of max here
  • Weightlifters share load between hip and knee; powerlifters are hip-dominant here
  • Sideways knee load in a barbell squat is a consequence of stance width, not a fault here
  • Elite weightlifters produce MORE frontal plane hip moment than lower-level lifters, not less here
  • Elite powerlifters vary widely in how they load their joints, so there is no one ideal form here
  • Lifters who fail a squat above their max show reduced extension and lower muscle activity here
  • The knee falls into valgus in ~77% of ACL injuries on video here
  • But knee valgus does not predict who goes on to tear an ACL here
  • And the drop jump test cannot predict ACL injury in elite players here

Mentioned in this episode:

Done-for-you client acquisition:



This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

AdBarker - https://adbarker.com/privacy

Transcripts

WEBVTT

::

Most of us were taught that if a client's knees go inward as they squat or lunge,

::

that means two things, weak glutes and they're increasing the injury risk to the knee.

::

And because of those things, most of us have been taught and probably still

::

do, Q, knees out during a lunge or squat, or at least knees not in.

::

And I taught that for years. I've had my hands on the outside of a client's

::

knees, ask them to push outwards into my hands as they squatted probably hundreds of times.

::

But a deeper look into the literature actually reveals some very surprising

::

things and so I'm going to test both of those claims,

::

in this episode and walk you through the literature and by those two claims

::

what I mean is number one knees in during a squat or lunge does that indicate

::

weak glutes and number two is it dangerous for the knee all right so,

::

the reason I started doubting this in the first place, if your knees go in,

::

that indicates weak glutes,

::

is that some of the strongest squatters on earth do that exact thing.

::

Go to YouTube and type in Olympic weightlifting or powerlifting and you will see.

::

Elite strength athletes, some of the best people on the planet,

::

stand up out of a deep squat with a barbell that can be double or in some cases

::

triple their body weight and with,

::

a lot, like a substantial fraction, somewhere around half I would say,

::

of elite lifters, their knees are.

::

Obviously move inwards quite a significant distance as they stand up from a deep squat.

::

And so if somebody is squatting two to three times their body weight and their knees go in.

::

It's really hard for me to believe that that's caused by weak glutes.

::

So something else is probably going on now. This is an observation. It's not proof.

::

But that is what made me look closer at this question, and it's not the answer,

::

but it's what prompted me to really deep dive into this.

::

Now, I can hear what some of you are probably thinking, which is that,

::

well, that's just compensation. When your knees go in under extreme heavy load,

::

that's form breaking down under a load that's too heavy. And hold that thought.

::

I want to bookmark that, and I want to come back to it a little bit later in

::

the episode, because I think that's exactly backwards. And I think it's the

::

most interesting thing in this episode. So just hold on to that thought about

::

the compensation. All right.

::

Before of the rest of this episode, though, will make sense,

::

we need to agree on a couple of pieces of,

::

anatomy and biomechanics, which is which muscles are primarily responsible for

::

lifting you up out of the bottom of a squat.

::

And I'm going to just say squat in this episode, but really it's any combined

::

hip extension, knee extension movement.

::

So that could be a squat, it could be a deadlift, which might not be a powerlifting

::

competition move, it might be just lifting, shopping up off the floor,

::

which is combined hip extension plus knee extension.

::

Might be a lunge, it might be a split squat.

::

There are myriad movements and formal fitness exercises that involve a combination

::

of hip extension, knee extension.

::

And so I'm just going to say the word squat, so I don't have to list all of

::

the exercises every time. All right, but this applies to all of the above.

::

All right, so which muscles lift you up out of the bottom of a deep squat, out of a squat?

::

So as you stand up out of a squat or lunge, you're doing hip extension and knee extension.

::

So the main muscles that are loaded, the main muscles that produce the primary

::

force are the hip extensors and the knee extensors.

::

Now, in a deep squat, especially below 90 degrees of knee flexion,

::

so when your hip is below your knee, the main hip extensors.

::

Are the glute max, gluteus maximus, and the adductor magnus,

::

which is the largest of the adductor muscles.

::

Now, I was taught in my original Pilates training, and probably you were taught

::

in your original Pilates training, that the hip extensors are the glutes and hamstrings.

::

And that is kind of true in that the, well, the glutes are hip extensors, that is 100% true.

::

The hamstrings are hip extensors.

::

They originate on the ischial tuberosity, which is posterior to the axis of

::

rotation of the hip joint, so far so good.

::

However, the hamstrings are all two joint muscles. They're both hip extensors and knee flexors.

::

And during a standing up out of a squat, you are extending the hip and flexing,

::

I'm sorry, extending the knee as well. You're extending the hip and extending the knee.

::

Now, hamstrings are hip extensors and they're knee flexors. So as you stand

::

up out of a squat, the hamstrings are shortening over the hip joint,

::

but they're lengthening over the knee joint.

::

And a couple of studies have actually examined what happens to the hamstrings

::

during a squat and found that they don't change length. They essentially stay

::

the same length throughout the squat movement.

::

And I've done a couple of video posts on this, just showing a little flex band

::

demonstration of the skeleton.

::

It's a very simple demonstration to do that as the hip extends and the knee,

::

extends, the distance between the ischial tuberosity and the tibial plateau

::

stays pretty much the same. So the hamstrings work isometrically in a squat.

::

And a squat is actually a very poor hamstring exercise for this reason.

::

The hamstrings aren't primary force producers in a squat. They act isometrically.

::

Their primary function is thought to be stabilization of the knee.

::

They're synergists with the ACL. They prevent anterior shear of the tibia relative

::

to the femur, and they also laterally and rotationally stabilize the knee along with the quadriceps.

::

So in a deep squat, the main hip extensors do not include the hamstrings.

::

Squats, lunges, all of those types of hip extension, knee extension moves are

::

not great hamstring exercises. To work the hamstrings effectively,

::

now of course hamstrings are active during these movements, but they're not

::

the primary mover, so they're not under massive load.

::

And so to work the hamstrings effectively, you need to isolate either the hip

::

or the knee. So you need to do isolated knee flexion or isolated hip extension

::

with the knee held constant.

::

But in a squat, the hamstrings are isometric. So the main hip extensors as you

::

stand up out of a squat, especially a deep squat below 90 degrees,

::

are gluteus maximus and the adductor magnus.

::

Not the hamstrings. All right.

::

So one more detail that matters is that the gluteus maximus has both upper and lower fibres.

::

So it has the iliac fibers, the fibers that attach to the crest of the pelvis,

::

and it has the sacral fibers, the fibers that attach to the sacrum.

::

Iliac fibers are the upper fibers, sacral fibers are the lower fibers.

::

And,

::

the upper fibers, especially, I mean all of the fibers, but especially the upper

::

fibers, are a powerful lateral rotator of the hip.

::

And when your hips are flexed,

::

lateral rotation is the action that pushes the hip outwards.

::

It's not actually true abduction. So if you think about you're squatting down,

::

you're at the bottom of a squat, if you push your knees out,

::

it is not true abduction, it is hip lateral rotation that you're doing,

::

combined with abduction. So when you move your knees out in a squat,

::

it's the gluteus maximus amongst

::

the other hip lateral rotators that is primarily responsible for that.

::

So if the knees go in, it's internal rotation. If the knees go in,

::

sorry, it's internal rotation.

::

All right, so...

::

In 2012, a.

::

Study by Braynton and colleagues in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning

::

Research found that knee extensor effort, or in other words,

::

the quadriceps, goes up as you go deeper into a squat.

::

So if you go halfway into a squat and then you go deeper and deeper into a squat,

::

the quads work more the deeper you go.

::

Whereas with hip extensors so the gluteus maximus and the adductor magnus that is also true.

::

And with hip extensors as you add more load,

::

hip extensor load goes up whereas as you add more load the quad load doesn't

::

go up so you can do body weight squats and as long as you do them deep your

::

quads will be very close to maximally loaded as long as you do enough reps.

::

Whereas with glutes and adductor magnus, you're going to load them more effectively

::

by going deep, but also they are more and more active and there's more load on them as you add,

::

more external load to the movement.

::

So a heavily loaded deep squat is going to bias to glutes and adductor magnus,

::

whereas a lightly loaded squat is going to bias more to quadriceps.

::

Now, both movements will involve all of those muscles, but the load shifts where

::

the external load influences where the internal load is born.

::

All right, so if you want to load the quads, just go deeper.

::

If you want to load the glutes and adductor magnus, go deeper and heavier.

::

All right, so this is the 2024 study that really was, as far as I'm aware,

::

the first bit of evidence to really look at knees going in and how that impacts hip and knee talk.

::

So this is Lauren Chu, 2024, the General Strength and Conditioning Research.

::

They had 32 people, 18 women, 14 men, squatting with a loaded barbell three different ways.

::

So they squatted in their natural way with no instruction.

::

So they just said squat, and then they deliberately cued them to squat with

::

their knees in, and then they deliberately cued them to squat with their knees

::

out. So three different ways, just no cue, then knees in, then knees out.

::

And they had a force plate underneath their feet, so measuring how much ground

::

reaction force, how hard they were pushing into the ground, plus motion capture,

::

to calculate the moments, the forces, at the hip and knee.

::

And what Lauren Chu found, that the knees-in squats produced.

::

Smaller hip extensor forces, smaller adductor forces, and larger hip lateral

::

rotator forces than normal squats.

::

So knees-in produced larger hip lateral rotator forces than normal squats.

::

And these were not just statistically significant, they were large enough to

::

actually matter in practice.

::

And so just thinking about that in the context of the anatomy we just talked through is that,

::

that combination of knees in deep squat biases the load towards the iliac fibers of the glute max,

::

or really all of the fibers, but it's particularly the iliac fibers of the glute

::

max and away from the adductor magnus.

::

So as you go into a deep, heavily loaded squat, you're increasing load on the hip extensors.

::

As your knees go in...

::

You decrease load on hip extensors, increase load on hip lateral rotators.

::

Now, adductor madness is a hip extensor, so you're decreasing the load on that as your knees go in.

::

Glute max is a hip extensor and a lateral rotator.

::

So as you decrease load on hip extensors and increase load on lateral rotators,

::

you actually don't decrease total load on the glutes, okay, because the load has to go somewhere.

::

And because as you decrease load on the adductor magnus and increase load on

::

the lateral rotators, well, that load just shifts more to the glute max.

::

So you're shifting load essentially away from adductor magnus and towards glute

::

max. And what they found with the knees out condition was the inverse.

::

So as you squat with your knees out, you decrease load on the external rotators

::

and increase the load on the adductors. So knees out actually biases towards adductor magnus.

::

Because think, knees out in a squat, as you stand up and straighten your legs, your knees adduct.

::

So you're using your adductors to stand up. Whereas if you start at the bottom

::

of the squat with your knees in, as you stand up, your knees,

::

your legs straighten, your knees abduct.

::

So you're working your abductors, or in this case, it's actually the lateral

::

rotators that are doing that action.

::

Okay, so that study really contradicts the folk wisdom that knees going in during

::

a squat indicates weak glutes.

::

In fact, it loads the glutes more, knees going in in a squat,

::

according to this study.

::

And why would we want to load the glutes more? Well, why would people unconsciously

::

squat with their knees in and load the glutes more? well, if the glutes are

::

stronger and you wanted to produce more power,

::

that would do it. You would become more powerful, you'd produce more force.

::

A couple of other things, this is back from the 2022 episode,

::

and so this is more speculation, that as your knees go in, you might be pre-stretching,

::

the glute max to produce more force.

::

Just like when you throw, you know, you automatically draw your hand backwards

::

beforehand, or when you go to jump up, you automatically kind of squat down

::

a little bit first. We pre-stretch the muscles to produce more force.

::

We might be doing that on the way up out of a squat with the knees go in.

::

All right. So now, I'm not telling you to cue everyone knees in in a deep squat.

::

Quite the contrary, I think you should actually stop cueing knee position at

::

all, except in very specific situations that I'll come to later.

::

Neither in nor out, just don't cue knee position.

::

All right, so deep-bladed squats and lunges, load the glutes in,

::

Dr. Magnus, very effectively.

::

You don't need to cue any kind of knee position to load the glutes,

::

just load the movement deep and heavy, and you will effectively target all of those muscles.

::

All right. So that is the literature I found on muscle recruitment and loading with regard to knees in.

::

So the only evidence we have points to knees going in, actually loading the

::

glutes more, not being a sign of quite weak or lazy glutes.

::

All right. Next idea is, and this is one that really surprised me.

::

In the sport with the heaviest squats on earth, powerlifting,

::

almost nobody has measured knee position in the frontal plane.

::

That's side-to-side movement of the knees.

::

When I went looking for research on elite powerlifters and weightlifters,

::

there's a lot of it, and it is good in terms of biomechanical research.

::

So Pertzer and colleagues, 2026 in scientific reports, put 29 national and international

::

powerlifters through 3D motion capture, squatting at 70% to 90% of their backs.

::

And they found that as the load goes up, the hip takes more and more of the

::

work while the knees and ankles maintain the flat work rate.

::

So that just mirrors what I said before, which is that as you add load to a

::

squat, the hip extensors are preferentially loaded more, like proportionately,

::

they take more of the load.

::

Uh, Rettenberg in way back in 1996, found that weightlifters and powerlifters

::

split the load differently. Weightlifters share between hip and knee pretty

::

equally, whereas powerlifters are more hip dominant.

::

And that is to do with where I think where the, where they hold the bar on their

::

back. So powerlifters tend to hold the barbell lower on their back.

::

So the center of mass is lower. So they do more of a torso lean in their squats.

::

Whereas weightlifters tend to hold the bar higher on their back.

::

So they stay more upright as the center of mass is higher.

::

But here's the thing, almost all of the research on weightlifters and powerlifters

::

and biomechanics of the knees and hips and torso,

::

is in the sagittal plane, which means they look from the side and they look,

::

at knee and hip and spine and ankle flexion extension.

::

There's essentially no research looking at frontal plane movement biomechanics

::

in powerlifters and weightlifters. So in other words, leg valgus or knee valgus,

::

the knees going in or out during a squat.

::

That research essentially hasn't been done. Now, there are several studies I

::

found that collected 3D data on elite lifters,

::

but all of those studies only published flexion and extension moments.

::

Sideways knee movement, the thing that we're talking about today in this episode,

::

And the thing that we typically cue most with relation to safety just is basically

::

unmeasured and unreported in this study.

::

And the closest study I found is Lati and colleagues, 2018, in the Scandinavian

::

Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports.

::

And they did report frontal plane knee movement. So in other words,

::

abduction, adduction, or knee moving in or outwards, in a loaded barbell squat

::

in a wide versus a narrow stance.

::

But they reported knee lateral movement lateral medial movement,

::

as a consequence of how wide you stand, not a fault to be corrected.

::

So just think about it, like if you squat with a very, very narrow stance,

::

like your feet almost touching together, your knees almost go straight forwards,

::

right? So there's very little lateral movement, you know, medial or lateral

::

movement of the knees as you go up or down.

::

Whereas if you stand with your feet, you know, one and a half times shoulder

::

width apart and your legs turned out, as you squat down, your knees move laterally,

::

and as you stand up, your knees move medially.

::

Even if your knees don't go into any kind of valgus, just because you're standing

::

in a wider stance, your knees move a little more laterally. So that's what they

::

looked at. They didn't actually look at valgus. Yeah.

::

All right, so the final study I found in relation to this on powerlifters was

::

a group called PERD CELL in 2025.

::

They estimated that at 90%.

::

Of their max, elite powerlifters generate peak joint contact forces,

::

of over 23 times body weight at the knee joint and nearly 27 times body weight

::

at the patellofemoral joint, the kneecap, the joint between the patella and the femur.

::

And so those forces are massive. And if you just go look on YouTube and type

::

in like powerlifting squat world record, that kind of thing.

::

You will see that elite powerlifters frequently, I would estimate roughly half

::

of elite powerlifters have extremely visible knee valgus as they stand up out of heavy squats.

::

And these people have, according to Pertzel, 23 times body weight going through

::

each knee, each knee, and they're doing valgus.

::

And these people have done thousands of reps of squats. To be able to squat

::

triple your body weight, you have to do thousands of reps over a large number

::

of years in order to become that strong.

::

And so that doesn't seem to be hurting their knees.

::

Now, don't have research on that, but seems fairly logical to me. All right.

::

Now, with that in mind, let's come

::

back to the thought I mentioned earlier that knees go in at 90% of max.

::

And so that that is a compensation. That's form breaking down under too much load.

::

And I want to take that apart because one of the things that on the surface

::

seems eminently sensible, but the closer you look at it, the less it makes sense.

::

So start with the word compensation. That's not a description of what happens.

::

That's a judgment about why it happened.

::

The neutral description of the knee moved inwards would be, simply to say,

::

the knee moved inwards. That describes what happened.

::

Compensation is a story about why the knee moved inwards.

::

I think this is a culturally constructed meaning. It's not based on what we

::

know about biomechanics.

::

So we have a notion of ideal form that, in my opinion, is largely aesthetic.

::

If you think of ideal form in pretty much any movement,

::

we think of straight lines, even curves, smooth movement, symmetry.

::

So we teach that. Now, there's nothing wrong with any of those things.

::

But liking how a movement looks is not the same as knowing that it's safer or more efficient.

::

Now let's bring load into the picture. At low load,

::

we have lots of movement options. At high loads, we have very few options.

::

Think about it. If you lift a pen off the floor, there's a million ways you could do it.

::

You could have your arms straight or bent. You could use just two fingers or your whole fist.

::

You could hold it close to your body or far away.

::

You could bend your back or your knee or your hip or lift your heels off the

::

floor there are so many ways you could lift that pen,

::

whereas to lift a 30 kilogram or 66 pound dumbbell off the floor you'd have

::

a lot fewer options you'd have to use a power grip like put your whole fist

::

around the handle and grip it hard,

::

you'd have to hold it close to your body you wouldn't be able to hold it with

::

your elbow straight at arm's length.

::

You'd have to get your back and hips involved.

::

As the load increases in any movement, you have fewer and fewer options about how to do the movement.

::

When you are squatting one and a half times your body weight,

::

you can't.

::

You have a lot fewer options about how to consciously arrange your body.

::

You just have to use whatever works best, what allows you to produce the most

::

force to do that movement.

::

So when we're practicing low-load movements, like squatting with a PVC pipe

::

on your back, like they do at CrossFit.

::

I've seen this happen a fair bit at CrossFit, where they practice squatting

::

or Olympic lifting usually with a PVC pipe.

::

It's basically the same shape as a barbell, but weighs essentially nothing, like a broomstick.

::

Well, in that situation, you can squat a thousand different ways.

::

And so when we do it in Pilates with no external load apart from the body weight,

::

you can squat or lunge a thousand different ways.

::

Knees in, knees out, back bent, back straight, arms up, arms down,

::

hip distance apart with your feet, shoulder distance, double shoulder distance,

::

feet together. There's so many ways you could do it.

::

So at low load, your movement is barely constrained by the task at all.

::

You've got enormous freedom. We can generally achieve something that looks similar

::

to our aesthetic ideal of smooth, symmetrical movement with straight lines and even curves.

::

Now, put 90% of your one rep max on your back.

::

How many ways can you complete that lift? Well, almost none.

::

The task has now, the load has constrained your options.

::

There's a very small set of movement solutions that will get that bar up,

::

and if you don't find one of them you don't get to complete the lift so under

::

a very heavy load like that and powerlifting research does show this.

::

Your nervous system finds a solution it arranges your limb positions etc and

::

your timing to produce the force required and if you lift the load then by definition,

::

that solution that strategy worked it produced enough force,

::

now we do see that power lifters as load increases they converge on a more similar

::

set of timing between hip and knee and spine extension,

::

okay so they might do different a much more varied set of timings under low

::

low but as high as load increases we see the time is converged now they're not

::

identical but they do converge quite substantially.

::

So if your technique changes as you go heavier,

::

is that truly a compensation or are we just abandoning the artificially imposed,

::

notion of ideal form that we

::

can afford when we're doing a light load because we have so many options?

::

Whereas when we're lifting a heavy load, we actually have to do it the most efficient way.

::

And so your nervous system, your primator cortex, your spinal cord,

::

et cetera, just says, okay, well, I'm just going to take over here because you're

::

obviously doing it wrong with your idea of keeping everything straight and neutral

::

and smooth and everything.

::

And I'm just going to arrange the body and engage the muscles in such a way

::

to produce the maximum force.

::

So is it a compensation? Because compensation implies there's a weakness in

::

one area, so we engage a different area to make up for it. where another way

::

of stating the exact same strategy is you engage the areas that are able to

::

produce the most force, the most efficiently.

::

And at 90% of your max, there isn't a better option available.

::

That's the whole point of lifting close to your maximum, which means the thing

::

we call form breaking down or compensation might be closer to the opposite.

::

It might be your best form, the form that lets you produce the most force.

::

And now flip it around because this is the bit that changed my mind if low load

::

lets you move a thousand different ways and high load lets you move almost one

::

way then which of those ways is the arbitrary way.

::

The form we teach with no load or body weight is a choice we picked it it's

::

like dance you can dance five ten fifty a hundred different ways and some of

::

them are more aesthetically pleasing than others.

::

We picked it not because it's forced on us by the task, but because at that

::

load, nothing is forced on us. The form that shows up at 90% of your maximum

::

is not an aesthetic ideal.

::

It's the biomechanical imperative that we have to move in that certain way if

::

we're going to complete the task. So, I.

::

Just want to add in one last little caveat on this, which is I don't want to overstate this.

::

Now, because everybody has different limb length segment, some people's femurs

::

are longer or shorter relative to their tibias. We have different joint surface

::

angles. We have different hip socket angles and depths and different femoral neck angles, et cetera.

::

We have different muscle insertion points. We have different relative strengths

::

of different muscles in our body.

::

A taller person bending over to pick up something will have to bend more than a shorter person.

::

So there is no one ideal form for everybody.

::

But each of us, given our unique set of limb length ratios, muscle insertions, etc.,

::

we'll have some ideal, our own version of ideal form for a given movement,

::

picking something up from a given height at a certain load.

::

But the best alignment for producing force on this rep is not necessarily the

::

same thing that has the best for your knees in 20 years.

::

And these are separate questions, and I don't want to blur those two questions.

::

But what I'd say is that nobody has shown that it's harmful either.

::

In fact, the evidence we do have shows no harm. And one more thing worth knowing.

::

Um, Cholawicki et al measured national class powerlifters, uh,

::

back in the early 1990s, 1990, 1991, something. And he found large variability

::

in how they loaded their joints.

::

Um, and so there's no one ideal form even amongst the very best. All right.

::

So that's joint loading. Now I want to move on to the, to the,

::

the specifically to knee injury and most common knee injury being,

::

uh, anterior cruciate ligament injury.

::

And that is the injury, the knee injury, that is most commonly associated with

::

knee valgus or knees going in.

::

And so, yeah, this is the part where I don't want to leave you thinking that

::

knee position never matters. There is a situation where it does.

::

All right. So a systematic review by Gopinath and colleagues in 2024 in the

::

Journal of Arthroscopy pulled 13 video analysis studies covering 542 athletes, mostly in soccer.

::

And then they fell and they looked at the moment, the instant,

::

because soccer is televised, and they looked at the instant when people injured their ACL.

::

They actually froze the frame and looked at what was the position of the hip,

::

the knee, the ankle, the torso in the instant when the ACL was injured.

::

And they pulled 13 studies covering over 500 athletes and they found that the

::

knee was in valgus, so in other words, knee was inwards, in about 77% of those injuries.

::

So knee valgus does have an association with, in the moment,

::

of ACL injuries. It seems to be the position in which the ACL is injured. But here's the part.

::

That actually doesn't add up with that.

::

Researchers have tried to use knee valgus in squats and jumps and things to

::

predict who will get injured, and that has not worked.

::

So a meta-analysis by Kronstrom et al. in 2020 in the BMC musculoskeletal disorders,

::

they pulled nine prospective studies.

::

So those studies where they looked at people doing depth jumps,

::

so basically they'd stand on a box and they'd jump down and they look at how

::

much their knees go in when they land.

::

And then they follow those people over the next year and they see like who gets

::

an ACL injury and who doesn't.

::

And what they found was there was essentially no correlation between knee abduction

::

angle, so that's how much valgus they had,

::

or peak knee abduction moment, so the force, the knee valgus moment,

::

neither of those things had any correlation with future ACL injury.

::

So when you jump off a box and land.

::

With high impact, okay, there's no correlation with whether or how much your

::

knees go in and subsequent ACL injury.

::

Cross Hogg and Ed Al in 2016 in the American General Sports Medicine followed

::

710 elite female soccer players,

::

and they concluded that the drop-jump test, the one I just described jumping

::

off a box, cannot predict ACL injuries.

::

So valgus is, that's the knee going in, is part of the injury picture.

::

It's present in 77% of the moment of injury, but it's not useful as a screening test.

::

So both of those things are true. In fact, when I look deeper into the ACL injury

::

literature, looking at the mechanism, like the instant of injury,

::

anterior tibial shear, so the tibia sliding forwards relative to the femur,

::

so the tibia is the shin bone, the femur is the thigh bone, is the primary component of ACL injuries.

::

And there are researchers who think valgus in ACL injuries happens in the milliseconds.

::

After ACL rupture, not before.

::

So that the valgus might be a result of the injury, not a cause of the injury.

::

Now, this is still not what I would call settled science, but it is intriguing.

::

Now, the loading matters here very much.

::

An ACL tear is a high-speed, high-force, multi-planar event that unfolds in about 40 milliseconds.

::

A bodyweight squat or lunge on a reformer is not that on any axis.

::

So at the loads and speeds we work at in a studio, and in fact,

::

even during a three times body weight squat in powerlifting,

::

a knee that moves inwards is not any kind of danger.

::

It's not a safety problem that needs to be corrected.

::

Cueing knees out probably does have a place in ACL rehab, in hopping and cutting.

::

And I'm sorry, I can't remember the name of the research, but I did find a paper that found that.

::

Where drop jump, knee valgus wasn't associated with subsequent ACL injury,

::

actually knee valgus during cutting and vertical hopping was.

::

So cutting is where basically an athlete changes directions,

::

like rotates on one, like you It basically turns left or right whilst running fast.

::

So you're running and then you pivot to the left or pivot to the right,

::

and that is called cutting.

::

And so knee valgus during that high-speed running change of direction does predict ACL injury.

::

So if you're rehabbing ACLs or you're preparing athletes to prevent ACL injuries,

::

cueing knees out during cutting probably is valuable.

::

And cueing knees out during hopping, although hopping is not really a thing

::

athletes do, but if hopping is a core part of ACL rehab,

::

and so cueing knees out during hopping probably is something that is valuable

::

and that I will continue to do at this point for ACL rehab or prehab, you know, prevention.

::

All right. So in conclusion, a knee leaning in...

::

You know, looks like weakness because we've been culturally conditioned,

::

essentially, educated that that's the case with words like collapse, compensation.

::

The force literature, however, says that it just may be the glutes doing more,

::

not less, as that happens.

::

And in the sport where it would matter most, powerlifting and Olympic weightlifting,

::

almost nobody has ever bothered to measure it. They don't even worry about it.

::

It's just a common thing that happens. Half of athletes do it.

::

And the thing we call form breaking down under load may be the closest thing

::

to true ideal form for that person in that moment because it's the only form the task allowed.

::

A lot of what we're taught in Pilates school and on social media and weekend

::

workshops encourages us to look at the body and decide which part is failing

::

or compensating under the assumption that there is such a thing as universal ideal form.

::

Usually, we cannot see that from the outside. And sometimes what we're calling

::

a failure, compensation or

::

weakness or limitation, is the body solving the problem most efficiently.

::

We can't see people's relative limb segments very easily. We can't see their

::

limb segment lengths very easily. We can't see their muscle attachments.

::

We don't know the proportion of fast versus slow twitch fibers in each of their

::

muscles. And so we can't look at somebody and know their ideal form for a given movement.

::

Their nervous system does have all of that information though and can decide that.

::

What we can do is understand the basic biomechanics load and movement well and

::

coach the outcome of the movement rather than a specific alignment.

::

All right. I hope you found this at least interesting.

::

I'm going to put a bunch of those studies link in the show notes.

::

And if you like this episode and you like reading books,

::

check out my book on amazon it's called strengthen the person not just the body

::

part and it is about using science to rehabilitate or prehabilitate pretty much any injury,

::

all right thanks dear listener much love and i'll see you in the next one.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube