Artwork for podcast Adjusted for Risk
A Deep Dive into Fixed Income with DoubleLine's Jeffrey Sherman
9th April 2026 • Adjusted for Risk • Ryan Nauman
00:00:00 00:46:03

Share Episode

Shownotes

Live from Las Vegas, host Ryan Nauman welcomes DoubleLine Deputy CIO Jeffrey Sherman to discuss the macro backdrop and portfolio implications. Sherman outlines DoubleLine’s fixed-income focus and multi-wrapper approach across mutual funds, ETFs, and separate accounts. They cover the new Fed chair pick Kevin Warsh, Fed independence, the tension between inflation and employment, and the challenge of financing large U.S. deficits and Treasury rollover needs. Sherman explains why 10-year yields rose during the war amid a repricing of inflation risk, why the Fed’s threshold for cuts has increased, and why he prefers the front end and belly of the curve over long bonds. They discuss tight credit spreads, risks emerging in loans/private credit, agency MBS opportunities and Fannie/Freddie uncertainty, the attractiveness of emerging markets as a way to bet against the dollar, and the role of gold in diversified portfolios.

Zephyr can help financial advisors create modern diversified portfolios. Learn more here.

Learn more about DoubleLine here.

00:40 Walkup Music Banter

01:00 Live From ETF Exchange

01:23 Meet Jeffrey Sherman

01:41 Tahoe Small Talk

03:05 DoubleLine Overview

05:35 Macro Crosscurrents Fed

07:34 New Fed Chair Risks

10:52 Fed Independence Debt

13:21 Why Yields Rose

18:12 Credit Spreads Check

22:14 What Widens Spreads

23:15 Oil and Credit Spreads

24:47 Duration Strategy Today

27:28 Curve Positioning Playbook

28:35 Agency MBS Opportunity

30:51 Fannie Freddie Overhang

35:47 EM Debt as Dollar Hedge

38:32 Advisor Portfolio Takeaways

40:59 Gold and Dollar Outlook

41:44 Tahoe Banter and Wrap

Connect with Ryan Nauman: LinkedIn

Transcripts

Speaker:

Welcome to the Adjusted for Risk Podcast.

2

:

Join myself, Brian Nauman as I

talk market investments economic.

3

:

Let's get started in life as I help

prepare you for the upcoming in markets.

4

:

I work for Zephyr in all

of Queens Express by.

5

:

Self in my podcast, guests are

solely of their own opinions and do

6

:

not reflect the opinion of Zephyr

or Informa its parents company.

7

:

This podcast is for information

and purposes only and should not be

8

:

relied on for investment decisions.

9

:

Let's go.

10

:

Jeffrey, you like that walkup music?

11

:

I mean, that was amazing.

12

:

That was amazing.

13

:

Did everybody else get to

hear it or is it just me?

14

:

Yeah, I, I hope everyone did be.

15

:

I it took a lot of time trying

to pick that walkup song up.

16

:

Well, the thing is, is that, uh, I

always have walkup music in my head,

17

:

so I wasn't sure if it, I created that

and sourced it, or if it was from you.

18

:

Yeah.

19

:

So I, I, it was a good choice.

20

:

Good.

21

:

Good, good.

22

:

Welcome everyone to zephyr's

Adjusted Forest podcast.

23

:

We are on site at Exchange ETF conference

in Las Vegas, and I tell you I'm really

24

:

happy that we've, uh, we've scheduled

this podcast outside at 11 in the

25

:

morning before it gets really hot.

26

:

That's a beautiful day.

27

:

Perfect timing.

28

:

We got, we got some fake plants behind

us and we got some real palm trees

29

:

in front of us, so it's looking good.

30

:

It's fantastic.

31

:

Um, with me, Jeffrey, you don't

really need an introduction, but with

32

:

me is one of the keynote speakers

of the event, Jeffrey Sherman.

33

:

Uh, Jeffrey, thank you so much

for coming back on the show.

34

:

We.

35

:

At this event last year.

36

:

That's right.

37

:

Great conversation.

38

:

Honor to have you back on.

39

:

Normally when I open up the

podcast, say we're, you know,

40

:

live on the shores of Lake Tahoe.

41

:

We are not in Lake Tahoe today.

42

:

No.

43

:

No Dondo.

44

:

No Dondo.

45

:

You're not, yeah.

46

:

You, uh, you have some connections at ta.

47

:

Uh, yeah.

48

:

Uh, my parents, uh, used to live up there.

49

:

Um, you know, so I, I spent many,

uh, summers up there as well.

50

:

And, um, as I get older, I, I don't

like the, the cold weather as much.

51

:

Yeah.

52

:

But, but, um, I don't think

there's a better lake in the entire

53

:

country up than, than Lake Tahoe.

54

:

Yeah.

55

:

Yeah.

56

:

Uh.

57

:

I am a little biased, a little biased

since I lived there, but, uh, I agree.

58

:

Yeah.

59

:

I, although, although we could use some

snow, Jeffrey, uh, 70 degrees this week.

60

:

Yeah.

61

:

Wow.

62

:

That's pretty amazing.

63

:

Well, there's the heat wave

going through California.

64

:

Yeah.

65

:

Uh, when I drove back from the

office on Thursday, it was like

66

:

97 going through the valley.

67

:

So, um, I guess the rest of the, the

rest of the country's gonna have any,

68

:

any sympathy for us at all though.

69

:

Yeah, they, they can have, they

can have the snow that's, uh.

70

:

Ripping across the

country in those storms.

71

:

Thank you again for coming on.

72

:

It's an honor to have you on.

73

:

Really excited.

74

:

So much to talk about.

75

:

So much to talk about.

76

:

You know, like I said, LA we

spoke last year, same event.

77

:

I think last year we

had the liberation day.

78

:

Ah, to talk about.

79

:

Yeah.

80

:

Now we've got the conflict that

feels as if, you know, things

81

:

have changed, but then maybe

they haven't changed a whole lot.

82

:

Yeah.

83

:

End of year.

84

:

Um, but let's just start.

85

:

Jeffrey, you're the deputy, uh, CIO,

chief Investment Officer at Double Line.

86

:

Tell us a little bit

more about Double Line.

87

:

Um, we're a Los Angeles based, um,

uh, investment management firm.

88

:

We run just shy of a

hundred billion dollars.

89

:

Um, we focus on institutional

and wealth management clients,

90

:

so we have separate accounts.

91

:

We run mutual funds ETFs.

92

:

Shocking.

93

:

We're at the ETF conference, right?

94

:

Um, we run UIDs.

95

:

We have an international business.

96

:

Um, you know, we think of ourselves

as a, a full service investment firm

97

:

with a heavy focus on fixed income.

98

:

And that's, uh, that's one

of our specialties out there.

99

:

And, uh, you know, we just look to

provide solutions to clients and,

100

:

you know, we, we've always been

agnostic to what wrapper you use.

101

:

Meaning do you buy in

a fund, a mutual fund?

102

:

Do you buy in ETFA use it?

103

:

It's just bringing our investment

acumen and expertise mm-hmm.

104

:

Uh, to however people want

to access the product.

105

:

And so, um, you know,

with the kind of, um.

106

:

I would say the amount of growth in

the ETF industry, you can't ignore it.

107

:

Um, but we've also not just

started an ETF business.

108

:

We've been running actively

managed ETFs for over 10 years now.

109

:

Um, a couple of them under spider brand,

uh, spider double line, uh, whether

110

:

that's total return tactical or, you know,

our, our shorter duration product there.

111

:

Um, so we have a, a lot of experience

in the ETF wrapper as well.

112

:

Mm-hmm.

113

:

And then, uh, four, four years ago.

114

:

We launched our own ETF complex as well.

115

:

So, um, we just, we kind of go to where

the markets are moving and where people

116

:

want product and, um, you know, we, we

build products that we wanna invest in

117

:

ourselves and hopefully, you know, that's

what other people, uh, see as well.

118

:

So.

119

:

Um, you know, it's continuing to grow

and, um, we're excited about, um, you

120

:

know, just the opportunity out there.

121

:

Yeah.

122

:

I feel as if that's so important, Jeffrey.

123

:

Like, I don't want to invest

in a product that the manager

124

:

doesn't wanna invest alongside me.

125

:

Yeah.

126

:

Well I always, I always joke 'cause we get

a lot of things where clients will say,

127

:

well, is this your best ideas portfolio?

128

:

And I'm like, of course we, we

don't run a bad idea portfolio.

129

:

Right.

130

:

It may be bad, it may be bad, it may,

it may be a bad idea, but we didn't

131

:

think it was a bad idea portfolio.

132

:

Right.

133

:

So.

134

:

At the end of the day, we, we

have, we're bringing the same

135

:

process to each of our products.

136

:

It just depends on what's the parameters,

the guidelines, the, you know,

137

:

constraints we have there and how it's

supposed to behave through a cycle.

138

:

But in general.

139

:

Regardless of the product you're

getting from us, you're getting the

140

:

same type of thinking, the same folks

that are making those decisions as well.

141

:

Mm-hmm.

142

:

No, that's fantastic.

143

:

I love that.

144

:

Yeah.

145

:

The best, the best product, best ideas.

146

:

Well, of course they're

gonna be great ideas.

147

:

I love it.

148

:

So let's, let's start

on the macro level here.

149

:

Uh, there's a lot to contend with.

150

:

We've got a new Fed

chairman, we've got the war.

151

:

Conflict and Iran, however

you want to say it.

152

:

I think once you've roped in

12 or 13 countries, it's no

153

:

longer a skirmish or a conflict.

154

:

I think you kind of

gotta use the war word.

155

:

So we can use the war.

156

:

That three letter word, we can use it.

157

:

Okay.

158

:

Um, labor market supply,

demand has softened.

159

:

Inflation is cool, but

it remains sticky here.

160

:

So, but with that, economic

growth remains solid.

161

:

Um, right now, how do you shift

through all this macro noise, this

162

:

macro environment, and is there one

item that you're really focusing on?

163

:

Well, that's a, that is a lot.

164

:

Um, so from, from the standpoint

of the Fed, don't forget that

165

:

they don't forecast growth.

166

:

They do put in their forecast, but

their mandate has nothing to do with.

167

:

Growth in the economy.

168

:

So they focus on two things.

169

:

The inflation, they

call it price stability.

170

:

I call it that they only wanna

steal 2% of your money a year.

171

:

Uh, that's what the inflation is.

172

:

And I, I love the planes overhead.

173

:

It makes us feel like we're at home.

174

:

Um, but, but, um, but the thing is,

and then, and they always have a focus

175

:

on what they call full employment.

176

:

And so those two signals are the two

things that they're trying to, that are

177

:

at the core of the central, their mandate.

178

:

Are in conflict with each other right now.

179

:

So that's actually a conflict.

180

:

It's, it's not a war between,

it's not a, it's not a war

181

:

between labor and inflation.

182

:

It's a conflict.

183

:

But, so what you have is, you, you

mentioned the softening and definitely the

184

:

demand side of labor had been softening.

185

:

Um, and, but the other thing that's

happened over the last years is we've had

186

:

a softening of labor supply, meaning that,

you know, we have fewer people working.

187

:

And the last jobs report was a

little tough because the, the

188

:

participation rate, labor participation

rate went down meaningfully.

189

:

It went down like 40 basis

points, which you don't typically

190

:

see in a month to month.

191

:

So I wonder if there's

some noise in there.

192

:

But remember, we we're still kind of

giving the, the, the pullback from the

193

:

government shutdown, you know, um, we

still have some of those things out

194

:

there, but the Fed chairperson, it's,

it's, it's a really interesting pick to

195

:

have wars because wars, if you go off his

voting track record and his vocalization

196

:

of policy, he seems to be antithesis of

what Donald Trump wants of cutting rates.

197

:

Now, obviously to get the job, you had

to at least tell him that at one point.

198

:

So I'm sure that happened somewhere.

199

:

But you know, he, he's, he's

historically been a bit of an

200

:

inflation hawk, meaning that he has

a higher keener eye on, on inflation,

201

:

but also he's a balance sheet hawk.

202

:

He hates the size of

the Fed's balance sheet.

203

:

And if his objective is to reduce

the size of the balance sheet,

204

:

that's not helping monetary pay.

205

:

That's a tightening of policy.

206

:

Mm-hmm.

207

:

And so someone has to buy

those treasuries is the point.

208

:

So.

209

:

I think that it's an interesting

pick from the standpoint that

210

:

I think he's qualified for.

211

:

Sure.

212

:

Uh, I, I think he's a good pick, but

we'll have to see how, how he behaves.

213

:

And I say that because when you

get into like the Trump orbit, you

214

:

just, you can't extrapolate how

people have behaved in the past.

215

:

Yeah.

216

:

He tends to have this,

this power over people.

217

:

So I think it'll be interesting to

watch his first press conference.

218

:

I'm gonna go out on a limb here

and say it's not gonna go well.

219

:

It's not gonna go well.

220

:

'cause the reporters are armed to the

teeth and he's not used to that forum yet.

221

:

Yeah.

222

:

He'll get he'll, he'll,

he'll get into the job.

223

:

But he's only one person.

224

:

And I, I, that's what I want to come

back to is that so much is made of the

225

:

Fed chairperson because we've kind of

made them these mythical creatures,

226

:

you know, starting a Greenspan,

who's called the Maestro, right?

227

:

Uh, everyone subsequent to Volker

has been in this kind of world of.

228

:

Really getting the, the consensus, right.

229

:

He's a, the, the chairperson is

a consensus builder, and what

230

:

you have inside the Fed today

is a lot of divisive opinion.

231

:

Mm-hmm.

232

:

I would say there's probably

more hawkish behavior than

233

:

there's more dovish behavior.

234

:

You know, you have your Miron on

one side and you know you're gonna

235

:

have GULs be on the other side.

236

:

You're always gonna

have this kind of pool.

237

:

But the thing is, is that.

238

:

Even warsh himself can't

flip the vote right now.

239

:

And so to me, that's what I

think the market's gonna watch.

240

:

And I think with this

announcement, you see it out there.

241

:

The markets have been well-behaved.

242

:

It's not a bad pick, it's just

we don't know what it'll be.

243

:

And remember we got him for a long time

now Once, once he gets confirmed, right?

244

:

Yeah.

245

:

And so this isn't just a Trump thing, it's

the next administration, the next as well.

246

:

So I, I think it's a good pick.

247

:

I just don't know what to,

what to make of it, because.

248

:

Of the uncertainty around, I know

know the one criterion for the job

249

:

was you have to lower interest rates.

250

:

Yeah.

251

:

But it flies right in the face

of unwinding the balance sheet.

252

:

Right.

253

:

But you could also argue that maybe

you do both and then we have a

254

:

neutralist policy because of it.

255

:

But then why are you doing it?

256

:

You know?

257

:

I don't know.

258

:

Mm-hmm.

259

:

So, um, I, I, my, my, my, my

verdict is, is yet to be rendered.

260

:

And I'll watch him, uh, on the job.

261

:

Yeah, no, that's a great point, Jeffrey.

262

:

And for, you know, it obviously made

headlines that week that it was announced,

263

:

but I feel as if maybe it just hasn't been

talked a lot about, you know, there's a

264

:

lot else to talk about right now, but it,

it's maybe more should be considered in

265

:

it or, yeah, I, I think what's the, the,

the worst, or, or the thing that gives

266

:

me the most concern about it is the.

267

:

What Kevin War said about wanting

to work more closely with treasury,

268

:

and that reeks of a little bit of,

of softening the independence there.

269

:

Right.

270

:

And I understand you

have to work with them.

271

:

They're issuing the treasury,

you gotta figure stuff out.

272

:

You gotta get your liability management

exercise under, under control.

273

:

But are we gonna lower interest rates

because we're spending so much money?

274

:

Is that the Fed's job?

275

:

Mm-hmm.

276

:

It's really not.

277

:

You know, the, the Fed's

job is to the, the, the dual

278

:

mandate we just talked about.

279

:

So when I come back and look at

that, you know, we've been talking

280

:

about fed independence as at risk.

281

:

That's the one thing I don't think

that's been picked up enough on yet.

282

:

Um, and we'll see how it works.

283

:

We'll, we'll just, we'll totally

see how it works over time.

284

:

But, you know, it's, it's a

challenge because, look, we have

285

:

$10 trillion of treasuries have

to be financed in the next year.

286

:

Right.

287

:

In the next year.

288

:

That's what's rolling off of just

treasury, maturation schedule, and

289

:

it's gotta be financed somewhere.

290

:

Yeah.

291

:

Not to mention that if you

look at, you know, the CBO

292

:

estimates came out last week.

293

:

It said the first five

months we spent $1.05

294

:

trillion.

295

:

That's our deficit for the

first five months of the year.

296

:

And that has no war budget in it.

297

:

Right.

298

:

So I gotta think it's going up.

299

:

Right.

300

:

So we have a lot of challenges here too,

and the Fed has to contend with this

301

:

as well when they're thinking about it.

302

:

If we're spending this money and

we're providing so many treasuries,

303

:

they also gotta find buyers.

304

:

So.

305

:

If they want to unwind the balance

sheet, you need buyers, but we also

306

:

just have this natural, we need an extra

trillion every five months right now.

307

:

So it, it's a, it's a

tough situation, Ryan.

308

:

I mean, when I, when I look at

it, and so look, I, I think the,

309

:

those that are at the Fed, they're

gonna do the best they can.

310

:

We give 'em a lot of crap because,

you know, it's, it's, our job is

311

:

to criticize everybody else, right?

312

:

Don't, don't criticize yourself,

criticize everybody else.

313

:

But I, I think that when it really

comes back down to it, I think

314

:

they're gonna do the right thing.

315

:

And, you know, I, I don't

think Kevin Walsh is being a, a

316

:

political pawn in this right now.

317

:

Um, but we'll see, you know, again, I,

I reserve judgment until we get a couple

318

:

meetings under our belt and we'll see how

he leads the Fed, assuming confirmation.

319

:

Yeah, no, that's great Jeffrey.

320

:

A lot of times when I talk to

my guests, I, I was like, I want

321

:

the conversation to be very raw.

322

:

A conversation like we're

sitting at a pub, having a beer

323

:

with the airplanes flying over.

324

:

Yeah.

325

:

It gives us that raw

feeling of conversation.

326

:

I love it.

327

:

Well, in fairness, we only have

water, so we need to bring the, uh,

328

:

uh, maybe we ask exchange next year.

329

:

Yeah.

330

:

For, for some cocktails out here.

331

:

Um, let's talk about yields real quickly.

332

:

Before the conf, before the

war started yield 10 year

333

:

treasury yields fell below four.

334

:

Wars started now they're, what are they?

335

:

Four, 400, almost four 30 basis points.

336

:

I think I lost checked.

337

:

Is that counterintuitive?

338

:

What does that signate To me, I think a

flight to safety yield should come down

339

:

during this war, but that's not the case.

340

:

I think it's the market is saying

that there's this, there's gonna be

341

:

short term inflationary pressure.

342

:

Um, and you, you still don't, we don't

know the length of this war either.

343

:

And, uh, I think that's the, the bigger

variable here is that do we have $90 oil

344

:

price, you know, for the next six months?

345

:

You know, obviously it's bouncing

around a lot right now, so

346

:

there is no stability there.

347

:

But that's essentially, that's

how the market corrects itself.

348

:

Um, the cure for high

prices is high prices.

349

:

You're trying to discourage demand right

at the end of the day and consumption.

350

:

I, I think what you're seeing in the, the

rates market over the short term has been

351

:

a repricing of the inflation premium.

352

:

That's what it comes down to.

353

:

Okay.

354

:

And you'll say, well,

it's only 20 basis points.

355

:

Yeah.

356

:

'cause it's, it's probably, we

get inflation, maybe we get an

357

:

extra one, one and a half percent

inflation this year because of it.

358

:

Again, no one really knows,

'cause we don't know where the

359

:

path of oil is going right now.

360

:

But, you know, so when you start to price

that through, it kind of makes some sense.

361

:

By the way, you know, you're referencing a

data point of saying right before the war.

362

:

We were at the very low end

of the range right then too.

363

:

So I, I think when you, when you

look back and you go back to, let's

364

:

just say September of last year,

the 10 year treasury's been in like

365

:

a 50 basis point range, and the

low end's been like three 80 ish.

366

:

The high end's like four 30.

367

:

That's where we've been.

368

:

And so where are you today?

369

:

You're kind of at the

higher end of the range.

370

:

So I don't think it's uncanny to see

rates go up a little bit because of this.

371

:

And then, you know, probably you're

talking about financing the war, right?

372

:

It's expensive.

373

:

So that's probably part of it too.

374

:

That means there's more interest,

there's more treasuries, and so

375

:

I think some of that's there.

376

:

So the flight to quality trade,

you've seen it, you've seen it go

377

:

into like Swiss Franc, you've seen a

little bit in Japanese yen, but you

378

:

haven't a lot because of the pain

that you've seen in Japan this year.

379

:

So I, I think the, the

traditional havens have worked.

380

:

Okay.

381

:

But the question is, are treasury

still a safe haven asset?

382

:

And I still say it depends.

383

:

Right.

384

:

And if, if we're just doing a, a, you

know, an un uh, I don't know, probably the

385

:

best way to say, if, if we're just gonna

go out and spend money and get nothing out

386

:

of it, then yield should be higher, right?

387

:

It's not a productive, societal,

productive kind of, um, kicker to GDP.

388

:

So anyway, I think that's what

the market's pricing and you've

389

:

definitely pulled a rate cut out of,

out of the market, uh, this year.

390

:

In fact, last week we got down

to where there was only, it was

391

:

under one cut for the year and.

392

:

It kind of feels right, and I, I

don't think that the Fed should

393

:

hike because there's inflation.

394

:

This is why they strip

out commodity prices.

395

:

But I do think that the, the threshold

for cutting got higher, right?

396

:

Mm-hmm.

397

:

And I think that's what

the market's realizing.

398

:

Don't forget, Ryan, we

talked about this a year ago.

399

:

The, the bond market's been a bully to the

Fed for the last three and a half years.

400

:

Since, since, since j Powell said we are

done hiking rates back in September of 22.

401

:

The bond markets try to price

cuts in every single day since

402

:

then, and it's been wrong.

403

:

So it's, it's materialized.

404

:

Like, Hey, we got three cuts last year.

405

:

We got 'em by the skin

of our teeth effectively.

406

:

Um, and I think that's where

we are this year as well.

407

:

I think you still have enough

positive momentum in the economy.

408

:

It doesn't make sense to be cutting rates.

409

:

And then we'll see how things

evolve as the year goes on.

410

:

And look, the war is a, is a really

negative draw on people right now.

411

:

Like it's, it hurts disposable income,

it's gonna hurt some of the growth story.

412

:

But, you know, um, we just, markets have

a way of pricing pricing what it has to

413

:

be, and we'll get, we'll get through it

all, but I think yields make sense here.

414

:

Um, and I think you'll, you'll

find buyers, if, if they went up

415

:

another 30, 50 basis points, I

think you'd find significant buyers.

416

:

Because I think we all look

through the inflation thing.

417

:

It's somewhat, dare I say the

word transitory, you know?

418

:

Um, but it may be transitory from

a, I think there's a drinking game

419

:

for that, for that, for transitory.

420

:

Yeah.

421

:

Yeah.

422

:

It's, it's not as fun with water, but.

423

:

The thing is, is that I, I do think that

we may be mired in these prices higher

424

:

than the market's pricing right now.

425

:

And why I say that is that

there's been a lot of disruption

426

:

in supply of oil right now.

427

:

This is not a, Hey, the conflict's

over tomorrow, everybody goes

428

:

back to business as usual.

429

:

There's a lot of infrastructural

damage and there's a lot that

430

:

has to, to recover through there.

431

:

So, and by the way, it's not over yet.

432

:

So that's, that's the thing.

433

:

And I think the market has become a

little complacent because a lot of

434

:

these things that Trump backs off.

435

:

But it just sure doesn't feel like

the US is backing off anytime soon.

436

:

Yeah.

437

:

No, that makes sense.

438

:

Jeffrey, going back to what

our conversation we had last

439

:

year, I did pay attention.

440

:

I've got notes here about what you

talked about last year, so I'm holding

441

:

you to, how long was I, what year?

442

:

How long was I about everything?

443

:

You, you were pretty spot on a year ago.

444

:

Okay.

445

:

Between what's happened in a year.

446

:

A year ago, you reduced risk.

447

:

In your portfolio credit risk.

448

:

Yep.

449

:

You took the reduced credit risk, you

went into more risk off, um, treasuries.

450

:

Yep.

451

:

Agency MBS, um, and it wasn't

because of geopolitical risk,

452

:

it was more credit spreads.

453

:

Weren't getting rewarded.

454

:

How do you feel about

credit spreads today?

455

:

Are you still bearish on credit?

456

:

So we were never bearish per se.

457

:

It was more of a, a, a thing of like, we

didn't like the riskier parts of credit.

458

:

And I still stay in that camp today,

and I think we've seen more of the

459

:

risks show up in the last six months.

460

:

Right.

461

:

You've seen this a lot in the loan market.

462

:

You've seen it kind of

in the private markets.

463

:

We're just at the tip of the

iceberg of this loan kind of issues.

464

:

'cause the pain's been in the loan

market for the last few years.

465

:

Mm-hmm.

466

:

'cause they had the, all the hikes

hit them, the, the, the fastest.

467

:

And so when I look back at it, we

ended up, you know, as yields got

468

:

lower in the year, we actually went

and put more credit risk on in the

469

:

summer and it turned out to be okay.

470

:

Um, and then we had this huge risk rally

in the last month or so of the year

471

:

that was mainly in corporate bonds.

472

:

And then the securitized markets were on

fire for the first six weeks of the year.

473

:

And so now we're back in that

position where a few weeks ago we're

474

:

like, yeah, it doesn't make sense

to be adding more credit risk here.

475

:

Um, but now given some of the little

noise we've seen here, it's starting

476

:

to look a little bit better, but let's

talk about invest rate corporate bonds.

477

:

Okay.

478

:

Off the lows, we're 15 basis points wider.

479

:

Should I be, how excited should

I be about 15 more basis points,

480

:

Ryan, on a seven year asset, right?

481

:

I mean, is that really gonna

change my outlook on things?

482

:

Probably not.

483

:

The high yield market off the

tights were probably 50 to 60.

484

:

Just depends on pricing

this morning, uh, wider.

485

:

That's not a lot either.

486

:

So the thing is, is that I and I, it feels

like there's much more headline risk.

487

:

Forget, forget the geopolitical.

488

:

It seems that there are

credit problems right now.

489

:

And are they gonna be okay?

490

:

Yes, they always are.

491

:

Um, but we're gonna

find out who's exposed.

492

:

And I think it's gonna take a lot longer

than we all think because we're all used

493

:

to analyzing public markets and saying.

494

:

Oh, well, once you've, we all know

it's, the market will punish you.

495

:

You can't punish the private trade.

496

:

Private will just be what it is.

497

:

So I, I think that this

thing stays over us longer.

498

:

Um, and we'll see how the workouts

work and at the end of the day, there

499

:

was a lot of money that went into it

and we'll see how the underwriting is.

500

:

Um, but when I look at the

market and I look at like bank

501

:

loans, they're weak right now.

502

:

They're bleeding into

the CLO market, right?

503

:

Um, it's hitting other things.

504

:

And so, um, these are the things

we're talking about, but they

505

:

last longer than you think.

506

:

They, they, they, the, the excesses

last longer and also so does the pain.

507

:

And I think that's what we're

all trying to digest right now.

508

:

And, but things have

been very well contained.

509

:

I mean, I just had an investment call

with the team, with all the sector heads

510

:

and, you know, certain markets are immune

right now, like the a BS market has.

511

:

You wouldn't even know there's a war

you wouldn't even know there's conflict.

512

:

So there's, there's just little

pockets out there and I think what

513

:

we're seeing in credit in general

is that there's still a bid for it.

514

:

And there is because a lot of the

under, a lot of the US companies

515

:

are in good shape and so that's

why credit spreads are tight.

516

:

So I reminded the team last year

that just because spreads are

517

:

tight doesn't mean they widen.

518

:

They can stay very tight

for a long period of time.

519

:

And history shows you this from like 2003.

520

:

To 2006, which was a very good time.

521

:

We were coming off the recession.

522

:

The IG market traded in like a 40

basis point spread band over that

523

:

three year period, and we got to some

of the lowest spreads on record, and

524

:

it takes a catalyst to do it and.

525

:

You know, you need a

disruption in credit to do it.

526

:

And that will come at some point when

some of the bad underwriting shows up.

527

:

It.

528

:

Jeffrey, that's a perfect segue 'cause

I was gonna ask, you know, we are

529

:

oil's over a hundred dollars, we've

got all this noise out there, all this

530

:

concern, but like you said, spreads,

if only widen by 15 basis points.

531

:

What do I dare ask?

532

:

Maybe I shouldn't ask this, but.

533

:

What's it gonna take for spreads to

get more attractive at this point?

534

:

You, you kind of mentioned it, but

it's like, we have all this noise yet.

535

:

Yeah, but it's, it's noise

as you said, like oil prices.

536

:

Are they gonna stay here for five years?

537

:

I don't know.

538

:

Right.

539

:

We don't know what it looks like.

540

:

And so I think, you know, the, the

first thing is to, to shake it off and

541

:

slough it off and say it's not a big

deal, but ultimately it's how long it

542

:

lingers around and goes into the input.

543

:

It's just like tariffs, right?

544

:

Tariffs were a debacle after

we got liberated, right?

545

:

And it's like, oh, we

have to dial it back.

546

:

Well, then it's like, okay, now we have

some, it's, you gotta find that balance.

547

:

And so it's just re-underwriting

is what it comes down to.

548

:

So the question is, is how

do you price oil today?

549

:

Like, how do you put that into

your model of your inputs?

550

:

And by the way, oil is the most

important commodity in the world.

551

:

It just still is.

552

:

You know, I, I know people would argue

semiconductors and chips pretty close.

553

:

I would agree with that.

554

:

But oil is still very important.

555

:

We all use it every day.

556

:

So.

557

:

I think that what you're seeing

there is that, is it temporary

558

:

or is it gonna be a longer, you

know, kind of structural problem.

559

:

And I, I don't know, I think

the market is being a little too

560

:

aggressive and assuming it's all

gonna go away and go back to normal.

561

:

But then again, that's our job as bond

investors is to worry about things.

562

:

Yeah.

563

:

So do you think then credit spreads are.

564

:

C, you know, reflect it at the

right level right now you think?

565

:

I, I do.

566

:

I do, I do.

567

:

Because I think that it,

you go back to fundamentals.

568

:

And so, you know, if you're talking

about credit that you know doesn't have

569

:

a lot of oil or energy input into the

business model, then why, why should it,

570

:

uh, have, have any reflection on that?

571

:

It comes down to leverage, it comes

down to interest coverage, it comes

572

:

down to all the metrics we'll look at.

573

:

To say, can you pay your bills back?

574

:

And so, you know, again, one part that's

been hot shocking is the energy names,

575

:

you know, in the high yield space.

576

:

Right.

577

:

Uh, they've done very well

recently because they're gonna,

578

:

they're gonna make their payments.

579

:

Right.

580

:

So I, I think it's, it's trying

to say how long does this go?

581

:

And, uh, obviously none of us know,

but the conflicts in the Middle

582

:

East tend to last a lot longer than

ever forecasted by our politicians.

583

:

Yeah, exactly.

584

:

It's been more than a week.

585

:

Yeah, it's been, yeah, it has.

586

:

I think this is the third week

now, you know, and it sure doesn't

587

:

look like it's any, uh, any less,

uh, less, uh, toxic than it was.

588

:

Exactly.

589

:

Let's, uh, talk a little

bit about duration.

590

:

There's kind of that, what do you

do at this point with duration?

591

:

Do you lock in some of these yields

that are, could be attractive at

592

:

this level, or do you go shorter?

593

:

Yeah.

594

:

Because of the uncertainty out there?

595

:

Well, I mean, I think that when you think

about locking in yields, the question

596

:

is, okay, what's the Fed gonna do?

597

:

So if the Fed cuts rates this

year, let's say a couple times,

598

:

does the backend follow it?

599

:

Sure hasn't thus far.

600

:

Right?

601

:

So that's a different story.

602

:

But if you're talking about locking

in, you think there's a couple cuts?

603

:

Maybe owning something on the

two year part of the curve

604

:

ma does make a lot of sense.

605

:

Right?

606

:

So in our shorter duration products,

we actually have lengthened our

607

:

duration a little bit because we

had rolled down, you know, that's

608

:

the one thing about a bond investor.

609

:

Every day your portfolio gets

shorter, you know, just by that

610

:

you have to reinvest some things.

611

:

And so what we had was, um, you know,

we, we rolled some of our exposure out.

612

:

Uh, on our t-bills and things,

trying to move out the curve a little

613

:

bit, but we still own floaters.

614

:

I still, you know, in the low duration

product, you know, have roughly

615

:

20, 22% floating rate debt still.

616

:

Why?

617

:

It's kind of because the bond market's

been wrong on that and I'm not,

618

:

we're not forecasting that side.

619

:

And if I have good credit

that floats, it's fine.

620

:

So I understand why investors are skittish

of duration and, um, there's a phrase

621

:

we like to use that in general that

we say investors fight the last war.

622

:

I'm not talking about the one ongoing

right now, but we're still fighting the

623

:

inflation war and I think that that has

burned a lot of people and it's still

624

:

seared into their memories and they're

skittish on duration for that reason.

625

:

And what I tell people is if you

think cash rates are coming down,

626

:

you probably should be moving

out the curve a little bit.

627

:

And so from our standpoint, we like

front end paper, like we like stuff in

628

:

the one to two year parts of the curve.

629

:

There's different parts of the

market you can buy there and you can

630

:

do a hundred, 125 over cash today.

631

:

So that's pretty attractive.

632

:

Mm-hmm.

633

:

Um, and, but if you start to buy

duration and you move into the

634

:

belly of the curve, now you're

only picking up maybe 150 to cash.

635

:

But there is the potential, if things slow

down, if this causes some slowdown, I do

636

:

think yields come down across the curve.

637

:

So I like a mix of it.

638

:

But in general, general, um, I,

I, I really don't mind owning

639

:

intermediate duration risk.

640

:

But we hate the 30 year treasury.

641

:

We hate the backend of the curve,

and I hate the backend of the curve.

642

:

In every market, the developed

world, backend rates have been on

643

:

a tear upward, and almost every

single developed world country

644

:

trades near the high of those ranges.

645

:

This is not just a US phenomenon.

646

:

This is something that permeates the

entire developed world because we

647

:

all have these same fiscal problems.

648

:

So when it comes to duration, I don't

think you should load the boat up with it.

649

:

Mm-hmm.

650

:

I think you ought to be careful here.

651

:

And look, I like the five

year part of the curve.

652

:

Just to me, that's the economy.

653

:

And if things slow down that part rallies.

654

:

Um, but you don't get huge

pickup, continue to go out.

655

:

'cause the curve isn't that steep.

656

:

You know, where it's steep is two is

the thirties and it, I think it's steep

657

:

for a reason, is that a lot of us are

skittish on that back and the curve.

658

:

Yeah.

659

:

That's fantastic.

660

:

So you diversify a little

bit across the curve then?

661

:

Yeah.

662

:

Yeah.

663

:

I mean, I, I like owning

credit on the front end.

664

:

I like owning rates in the belly.

665

:

Right.

666

:

And own a little bit more like in the

10 year and a little bit out, just to

667

:

kind of balance out some duration there.

668

:

But I think owning shorter duration credit

today is very interesting because I don't

669

:

have to deal with, you know, tariff and

certain, I, there's, I I, it's easier to

670

:

calculate on a shorter path than saying,

are you gonna survive for 10 years?

671

:

Mm-hmm.

672

:

Right.

673

:

But there's a reason that credit

spreads are tight is because

674

:

the underwriting has been good.

675

:

And don't forget, these companies have de

levered just based on their stock prices.

676

:

Right now that can reverse and that can,

you know, lever you up a little bit.

677

:

But the quality of the, of the overall

market is higher than it's been, but

678

:

there's just a lot of debt out there.

679

:

Yeah, no, fantastic.

680

:

So one of the best performing fixed income

asset classes over the past year has been.

681

:

Agency mortgage backs fantastic year.

682

:

Do you think there's more

room to run mortgage rates?

683

:

They've come down some, does that concern

you about maybe some prepayment risk

684

:

there or are they still attractive?

685

:

Yeah, they're still attractive.

686

:

Um, but they're not like they were, so

mortgages really suffered in 22 and 23

687

:

because they were over owned by the banks,

you know, so remember the way the banking

688

:

system works, when we got those stimulus

checks and it went to the banking system.

689

:

It sits there, they have to invest

and they bought a lot of mortgages.

690

:

So mortgage spreads got extremely

tight in like the summer, let's call

691

:

it, of 21, um, all the way through 22.

692

:

And then we got this big reversal.

693

:

And so they were mired

out there for a while.

694

:

It, it took really the second

half of the year for agency

695

:

mortgages to really come down.

696

:

And a lot of that was rate

volatility coming down.

697

:

So, 'cause you have, you're short

an option, blah, blah, blah.

698

:

No one cares about all this stuff.

699

:

But the thing is, is that you do have

prepayment risk on buying that trade.

700

:

That trade today probably yields

one 20 over comparable treasury.

701

:

So I'm not using a spread, I'm

just giving you duration match.

702

:

Um, but you can, you can

actually manage that risk.

703

:

Ryan, there's when to do it,

and there's these things called

704

:

seasoned coupon mortgages.

705

:

These are these old archaic

mortgages back from:

706

:

They have two and a half, three

coupons, three and a half coupons.

707

:

So with that, they don't

have prepayment risk.

708

:

Now you can say, well,

what if someone refis it?

709

:

Well, great, those bonds traded

like 85 cents in the dollar.

710

:

I like things that I buy at 85 that

pay me a hundred really quickly.

711

:

So there's a way of managing

that risk through it.

712

:

Now it doesn't have as much yield on

that for good reason 'cause you don't

713

:

have that, that negative convexity.

714

:

But at the end of it, I think

that managing that together

715

:

is a very interesting way.

716

:

And by the way, you can put that

portfolio together and you have a

717

:

higher yield than IG corporates.

718

:

Now it doesn't mean I hate IG corporates

'cause I think IG corporates, they, they

719

:

behave well in the same environment.

720

:

And they don't have that prepayment side.

721

:

Mm-hmm.

722

:

So I think there's ways of managing

the two together that are, are

723

:

ways of dialing your risk down.

724

:

Um, but look, you know, mortgages got

very tight on that GSC announcement

725

:

that President Trump did, and it

lasted like two days and we gave it

726

:

all back because everybody's like,

yeah, there's really nothing there.

727

:

Right.

728

:

Um, so I think a bigger concern still

that overhangs the agency market is

729

:

what happens with Fannie and Freddie.

730

:

Are they gonna, you know, make 'em public?

731

:

Is it gonna be some quasi

public private thing?

732

:

And I say, who knows still also why I, I

I always ask, why, why would you do this?

733

:

And it doesn't make sense.

734

:

'cause I think that actually could

potentially increase borrowing costs.

735

:

That doesn't sound like someone trying

to solve an affordability crisis.

736

:

Yeah, right.

737

:

Exactly.

738

:

So anyway, I, I do think that's a

attractive part of the market that's

739

:

not owned enough across folks as well.

740

:

And I think, um, there's just ways

of executing those trades I think

741

:

are, are, are very interesting today.

742

:

That you can mitigate a lot of that risk.

743

:

I feel as, I'm glad you brought

up Freddy and Fran Fannie.

744

:

Um, it feels as if that's been an

issue and a talking point for years.

745

:

What to do with them?

746

:

Well, I, well I think it comes back

to why did we let 'em be what they

747

:

were in the early two thousands.

748

:

Um, um, I worked for a guy that

used to call 'em the biggest

749

:

hedge funds in the world.

750

:

They get to borrow at agency rates and

they lever up a mortgage portfolio and

751

:

they, they don't know how to manage the

convexity and they'd screw it all up

752

:

and they'd still make profits, you know.

753

:

But, um.

754

:

Trump has been on this from

his first, first campaign or

755

:

for his first administration.

756

:

He, he, he thinks that

they should be public.

757

:

Um, you know, and so I, I don't know.

758

:

Or, or I guess they should be private.

759

:

They should be, they should

trade in the public markets.

760

:

What I was thinking, um, but I don't

understand why, and the criticism

761

:

is that, oh, why, you know, like

Fed bo these mortgages, they juiced

762

:

house prices, all that stuff.

763

:

Well, they did that in oh

eight because there was no bid.

764

:

And by the way, housing still fell 50

to 60% depending on your region, right?

765

:

So, um, the Fed buying mortgages

didn't distort the mortgage market.

766

:

Um, they were just, what happened

when the Fed first did it?

767

:

When Bernanke did it, he didn't

wanna be Japan and own too

768

:

much of the treasury market.

769

:

Now, I think if you ask the Fed Governors,

you even ask Wars, they would rather

770

:

own treasuries than mortgages because

they had at least controls the interest.

771

:

So don't forget this, Ron.

772

:

I'd like to remind people of this

because I think it gets lost a lot.

773

:

Every single treasury that sits

on the Fed's balance sheet,

774

:

because Fed rebates, treasury.

775

:

Those are financed at zero.

776

:

You know what's not financed at zero?

777

:

The mortgage is 'cause the

mortgage is in the pool.

778

:

They're just, they're just

putting that back into the

779

:

income of the treasury account.

780

:

So there is something special about owning

your own treasuries, is that because of

781

:

the mechanism there is financed at zero.

782

:

So coming back to Fannie and Freddie

though, is that if we're gonna

783

:

increase borrow cost to homeowners,

how is that a helpful thing?

784

:

Now you can say that they should

have never been in the market.

785

:

We've done it for 50 years roughly.

786

:

Right.

787

:

And so we'll have to

see what, what happens.

788

:

And it sounds like they may just

sell a piece of it, but that's

789

:

what, what Fannie and Freddie

were back in the two thousands.

790

:

They were quasi-public and private.

791

:

And so what is your objective?

792

:

Is it to generate return for shareholders?

793

:

That doesn't sound like

you're helping affordability.

794

:

It sounds like you're maximizing

profit, but I, I don't know.

795

:

It's, it's the answer.

796

:

And if you do anything to

increase the cost of borrowing.

797

:

Uh, that doesn't sound very popular to

me in, in, in the US populace today.

798

:

Yeah.

799

:

No, that's fantastic.

800

:

It's always, it seems like it's always

been a question for, for a long time.

801

:

Well, it's, it's easy target, right, too.

802

:

Yeah.

803

:

'cause it feels like

it's being manipulated.

804

:

There's something happening there.

805

:

But remember for from 2007 till like 20

11, 20 12, that was the only game in town.

806

:

There was no private

lending and mortgages.

807

:

The only way it was happening is that

if it was Fannie Freddie eligible.

808

:

To be able to put in those

conforming pools to do it.

809

:

And so that market had to reopen in like,

I think it was like 20 12, 20 13, we

810

:

started seeing non agencies come back.

811

:

Mm-hmm.

812

:

And restructure of this stuff.

813

:

So, you know, if you want to know where it

should trade, go to the non-agency market.

814

:

That means you're gonna slap on,

depending on the capital structure,

815

:

2020 to like 70 basis points, you know?

816

:

So, and by the way, another thing.

817

:

We already have the mechanism

to bail out the taxpayer.

818

:

On Friday and Friday, we created these,

these securities called credit risk

819

:

transfers back in the, in the mid-teens.

820

:

Uh, and the reason for that was that

the taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook.

821

:

By the way, those things

are extremely well bid.

822

:

They trade very well.

823

:

And there's will investors willing

to go out there and support that.

824

:

And these are like, they're not

technically first loss pieces.

825

:

They're second loss,

but they're very thin.

826

:

And so we already have the mechanism

to protect the to the taxpayer.

827

:

And it's already, so that's what

I don't understand, like mm-hmm.

828

:

I come back to why.

829

:

But if I sat around and thought

about this administration and why I

830

:

would just lose brain cells, right?

831

:

I, I, I can't ever figure it out.

832

:

Yeah.

833

:

Jeffrey, a lot of people ask me, why,

why, Ryan, why, why are you doing that?

834

:

Yeah.

835

:

I feel like a 2-year-old, right.

836

:

Why?

837

:

Right.

838

:

I'm going through my why

stage of life right now.

839

:

But I, I think that coming back

to it, it's that I, I think that

840

:

the administration thinks it's

better off, and I, I don't think

841

:

they're doing it with mal intent.

842

:

Um, but you know, it has knock

on effects and, uh, I just, I

843

:

can't see the societal benefit.

844

:

At this point because we have that

mechanism to protect the taxpayer

845

:

already and the market trades well.

846

:

Yeah.

847

:

Real quickly, Jeffrey, too, emerging

markets, whether it's equities or fixed

848

:

income debt, they've had a fantastic year

outperformed regardless of asset class.

849

:

This might be more of a question

for the US dollar, but do you

850

:

think that's another, is still

attractive there, moving forward?

851

:

Or do you think it's gonna run its course?

852

:

Some definitely.

853

:

I think it's definitely attractive

and, uh, we, we've been buyers of it.

854

:

We started buying it, you know, kind

of early in the summer last year, so

855

:

we were a little late to the trade.

856

:

I'll, we'll admit it.

857

:

Um, but it's something that we continue

to add and I think with this turmoil

858

:

right now that's going on, it's, it's a,

it's becoming a little more interesting.

859

:

And here's the difference is

that yes, it's a dollar trade.

860

:

At the end of the day, you're buying

this to bet against the dollar,

861

:

but to me, it's the best way of

betting against the dollar right now.

862

:

And so coming into before this, let's

call war, um, you had every tailwind,

863

:

you had higher yields, you had kind

of better fiscal positions, you had

864

:

commodity producers, whether it's

copper, nickel, you had the gold miner.

865

:

I mean, there was every, every confluence

of things was in a positive manner.

866

:

Um, and now you kinda

hit a little speed bump.

867

:

But I think that the difference here

is I, if I bet against, let's say the

868

:

Euro or I bet against the yen or the

pound, I have an issue because our

869

:

rates are too high relative to their, so

it's hard for me to see why the dollar

870

:

should go down against them until we

get more yield convergence, meaning that

871

:

there, there's either come up or, or

it's come down, we meet in the middle.

872

:

So to me, the reason the emerging

market trade is a better way, one

873

:

is I think that there's much more

room to run in the dollar there.

874

:

But while I wait, I get

more, I get more yield.

875

:

So where if I build a developed world

portfolio, I'm giving up a hundred

876

:

to 150 basis points to US rates.

877

:

I'm picking up 200 or two

50 relative to treasury.

878

:

So I get paid for the trade.

879

:

Now I know I get more

volatility though, right?

880

:

But, uh, I do think that this is a, a

secular trend that one wants to play on.

881

:

And if we're gonna continue

to print, you know, a trillion

882

:

dollars every five months.

883

:

Um, I think the, the direction

of the dollar is still down.

884

:

Yeah, no, that's fantastic.

885

:

And a lot of people are probably

underexposed there to emerging markets.

886

:

They left a lot of, you know,

diversification's a big theme.

887

:

Well, it didn't work for,

it didn't work for a decade.

888

:

And that, that's, that's the issue.

889

:

Right.

890

:

And so, you know, once you,

once you get in, you say,

891

:

that's never gonna work again.

892

:

What that means is it's

about to work instantly.

893

:

Yeah.

894

:

Right.

895

:

Whenever you hear never, it means

it's gonna happen instantaneously.

896

:

And that's where we all

were with US equities.

897

:

Right.

898

:

And so even though, yeah, last

year was a good year in equities,

899

:

it was better if you were anywhere

else in the world practically.

900

:

Yeah.

901

:

Yeah.

902

:

Fantastic.

903

:

Jeffrey, one last thing.

904

:

We've talked a lot about

a lot of different topics.

905

:

What's it all mean?

906

:

Why?

907

:

What's it all mean for financial advisors

trying to build a diversified portfolio

908

:

with, you know, fixed income now that.

909

:

Divers or diversification

is back in vogue.

910

:

Yeah.

911

:

I mean, you, you have the ability

to offset risk in portfolios that

912

:

that's what it comes down to.

913

:

So I think that, you know, for

advisors, it's like, don't get

914

:

caught up in the headlines.

915

:

That's what always tell folks.

916

:

Like if you're, if you're a better

war general than ours, then go do it.

917

:

You know?

918

:

Um, but in general, you, you

can't get caught up in headlines.

919

:

You have to figure out what fundamentals

are, what are driving things.

920

:

And you know, look, we go through

different political regimes.

921

:

We go through different macro regimes and.

922

:

Right now the setup is, is a way where

you can still get income on this side.

923

:

Um, bond portfolios do outstrip

inflation in my viewpoint right now.

924

:

Um, and you know, you still have a

labor market that's holding up well

925

:

enough to support the consumer.

926

:

So all those things say that rates

should be somewhat range bound.

927

:

Probably.

928

:

You're gonna get some wiggles and

jiggles here, but at the end of it,

929

:

you gotta think about what you want.

930

:

And what I think about is one of the

bigger risk out there, and I don't

931

:

think it would be, it would shock you.

932

:

But it's the AI tech trade, and

you know what, a lot of that

933

:

doesn't exist in the bond world.

934

:

And so we can get things that, you know,

if you're talking about mortgages, you're

935

:

talking about, you know, commercial real

estate, you're talking about different

936

:

things, emerging markets, they're

not really exposed to these risks.

937

:

Like, yeah, the tail will wag the dog

at some point, but I think that, you

938

:

know, trying to double down on risk in

every asset class, that's the danger.

939

:

And so what we try to do with our credit

books is we try to say, okay, if we like

940

:

energy, do we want to own that in em?

941

:

Do we own that in the us?

942

:

Do we want to IG produce?

943

:

Do we want a high yield pro?

944

:

Where's the best value there?

945

:

And so I think that's what people need

to think about on the diversification

946

:

too, is that, you know, look,

bonds will work again unless we

947

:

have a high inflation environment.

948

:

And you know, people will say, well,

:

949

:

Bonds are dead forever.

950

:

They had to ReRack and reprice.

951

:

That's what they did.

952

:

And there's been periods of this

in the mid nineties where you had

953

:

this, when inflation's a problem that

everybody's gonna point to the seventies.

954

:

But in the mid nineties we had

inflation was running in the four or

955

:

5% range and bonds didn't do well.

956

:

So that's, you need real yields

is what it comes back down to.

957

:

And you have that today.

958

:

And even if you have this oil price spike,

I don't think that it keeps this pressure

959

:

on inflation for the next 12 months.

960

:

I think it's gonna be short term.

961

:

And the cure for high price is high price.

962

:

So bring it all back together.

963

:

You probably don't own enough gold.

964

:

You didn't own enough today, but you

know, it doesn't feel like the best time.

965

:

But I if you're, if you don't, if you

don't love the dollar either, I still

966

:

think gold is a very good bet there too.

967

:

And so I think that's another

piece of portfolios that

968

:

people need to think through.

969

:

And especially as the world kind of um,

central banks around the world really

970

:

start to restock those positions.

971

:

That's been the bid.

972

:

This has not been a retail

or wealth management bid.

973

:

This has been an institutional bid

and I think that, you know, by the

974

:

time this administration's over,

you may see gold double again.

975

:

Wow.

976

:

Well, just because of the

path of the dollar as well.

977

:

Yeah.

978

:

And just, there may be some, I don't

want to be wedded to dollars over the

979

:

next decade or two, and that, that,

that takes a long time to, to play out.

980

:

But it sure feels like that's

been playing out in the last,

981

:

you know, 15 to 16 months.

982

:

I'm glad you threw that nugget

in about gold, gold nuggets.

983

:

Yeah.

984

:

See what I did there?

985

:

Yeah.

986

:

You, you were looking for that hotel.

987

:

Is the cold nugget still exists?

988

:

I think it does.

989

:

It's in downtown Right know.

990

:

And interesting enough, uh,

Tahoe, it was a hard rock.

991

:

Yep.

992

:

And then the gold golden nugget took

it over then the past few months.

993

:

Yeah.

994

:

My, uh, my parents like to go down

there and eat too at, at the Hard Rock.

995

:

I, I always kinda enjoyed that place too.

996

:

Yeah.

997

:

I think it's changed names about, yeah.

998

:

Half dozen times in a couple years.

999

:

I mean, yeah, those

casinos flip over a lot.

:

00:42:13,544 --> 00:42:13,814

Oh yeah.

:

00:42:13,819 --> 00:42:14,115

They, the names.

:

00:42:14,294 --> 00:42:17,924

So I wish they'd flip over on

the inside and re and remodel

:

00:42:17,924 --> 00:42:18,975

and clean 'em up a little bit.

:

00:42:19,035 --> 00:42:19,274

Yeah.

:

00:42:19,274 --> 00:42:22,450

The, but the Caesars one did, I think

when they changed names and, uh, yeah.

:

00:42:22,544 --> 00:42:22,754

Yeah.

:

00:42:22,754 --> 00:42:24,089

But no, it's, it's always, yeah.

:

00:42:24,134 --> 00:42:24,285

Yeah.

:

00:42:24,285 --> 00:42:26,174

Tahoe, Tahoe does need some CapEx.

:

00:42:26,444 --> 00:42:26,685

Yeah.

:

00:42:26,685 --> 00:42:27,495

They really do.

:

00:42:27,495 --> 00:42:30,615

They, the, the street,

they need a lot of work.

:

00:42:30,734 --> 00:42:30,794

Yeah.

:

00:42:31,649 --> 00:42:33,419

But we'll, we'll take it.

:

00:42:33,660 --> 00:42:34,620

Yeah, we'll take it.

:

00:42:34,950 --> 00:42:37,919

Speaking of Tahoe, we, we need to

get you up there that maybe we can

:

00:42:37,919 --> 00:42:41,790

do the, uh, podcast literally on

the shores, Zephyr Cove, right?

:

00:42:41,850 --> 00:42:42,149

Yeah.

:

00:42:42,154 --> 00:42:42,245

Yeah.

:

00:42:42,870 --> 00:42:43,680

So we were founded.

:

00:42:43,740 --> 00:42:44,069

I know.

:

00:42:44,069 --> 00:42:45,000

It's a great launching boat.

:

00:42:45,000 --> 00:42:46,529

That's a good boat launch deck too.

:

00:42:46,529 --> 00:42:47,460

Yes, it is.

:

00:42:47,910 --> 00:42:50,850

Maybe we'll do it, maybe we'll do as

we'll do it from a pontoon boat out there.

:

00:42:50,879 --> 00:42:51,480

Oh yeah.

:

00:42:51,484 --> 00:42:51,805

That'd be really cool.

:

00:42:51,805 --> 00:42:52,109

There we go.

:

00:42:52,410 --> 00:42:57,419

You know, I often talk, it's like I love

doing the podcast because it typically,

:

00:42:57,419 --> 00:42:59,430

my conversations are with ski bumps.

:

00:42:59,790 --> 00:43:01,200

And nothing wrong with ski bumps.

:

00:43:01,229 --> 00:43:01,290

Yeah.

:

00:43:01,500 --> 00:43:05,580

But it's nice to have conversations that,

that people are passionate about investing

:

00:43:05,669 --> 00:43:07,379

and, uh, so I love doing the podcast.

:

00:43:07,379 --> 00:43:11,939

I feel as if we need to have exchange,

maybe move the conference up there.

:

00:43:12,240 --> 00:43:12,540

Yeah.

:

00:43:12,540 --> 00:43:16,799

I mean, um, there's not a big, uh, the

Venn diagram intersection isn't big

:

00:43:16,799 --> 00:43:18,899

between ski bums and investment folks.

:

00:43:19,169 --> 00:43:22,620

But I do know one, uh, MEB Faber, I was

just, I was gonna say me Meb is probably

:

00:43:22,620 --> 00:43:24,000

the quintessential example there, right.

:

00:43:24,360 --> 00:43:27,570

You know, I almost reached

out to MEB a couple weeks ago.

:

00:43:27,570 --> 00:43:30,150

Hey, Sherman's gonna be on the podcast.

:

00:43:30,150 --> 00:43:31,020

We're doing it live.

:

00:43:31,020 --> 00:43:32,820

Maybe we get MEV on here too.

:

00:43:32,820 --> 00:43:34,830

And I, I, I love Meb.

:

00:43:34,860 --> 00:43:35,490

I think he's great.

:

00:43:35,520 --> 00:43:36,030

I think he's great.

:

00:43:36,035 --> 00:43:36,085

Yeah.

:

00:43:36,090 --> 00:43:36,210

Yeah.

:

00:43:36,210 --> 00:43:39,570

He's always, he's always thinking

about, uh, he, he's definitely thinking

:

00:43:39,570 --> 00:43:40,800

about different stuff out there.

:

00:43:40,800 --> 00:43:44,220

And I think he's one of, I think the,

the finance world's better for having

:

00:43:44,370 --> 00:43:45,840

thought, thought leaders like him as well.

:

00:43:46,290 --> 00:43:47,590

Yeah, you're exactly it.

:

00:43:47,670 --> 00:43:49,980

It kind of, sometimes they

think it's outside the box.

:

00:43:49,980 --> 00:43:50,190

Yeah.

:

00:43:50,190 --> 00:43:53,610

I may get a lot of fanboy emails on that,

that I'm, I'm, I'm a, I'm a me fanboy.

:

00:43:53,610 --> 00:43:53,880

So.

:

00:43:54,690 --> 00:43:55,890

Awesome, Jeffrey.

:

00:43:55,950 --> 00:43:57,240

Great conversation.

:

00:43:57,360 --> 00:43:57,510

Alright.

:

00:43:57,510 --> 00:43:59,310

Thank you so much for coming out again.

:

00:43:59,370 --> 00:44:00,870

Always really enjoy it.

:

00:44:01,050 --> 00:44:02,130

Uh, all the insight.

:

00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:04,500

I learn a ton in our conversations.

:

00:44:04,680 --> 00:44:07,320

Where can our audience get more

information about Double Line?

:

00:44:07,620 --> 00:44:08,100

Uh, it's easy.

:

00:44:08,100 --> 00:44:09,030

Double line.com.

:

00:44:09,120 --> 00:44:11,670

Um, it's the easiest way to

do it, but also, uh, we have

:

00:44:11,670 --> 00:44:12,570

a lot of YouTube channels.

:

00:44:12,570 --> 00:44:14,820

We put out a lot of our macro

research and stuff out there.

:

00:44:15,315 --> 00:44:18,435

Uh, so YouTube, do youtube.com/double

:

00:44:18,435 --> 00:44:21,075

line capital, you know, so someone

already got the double line.

:

00:44:21,075 --> 00:44:22,665

We had to add the capital

in there to get that.

:

00:44:23,234 --> 00:44:26,475

I'm really impressed, Jeffrey,

because obviously we've

:

00:44:26,475 --> 00:44:27,944

posted podcasts on YouTube.

:

00:44:27,944 --> 00:44:33,375

I couldn't tell you what my YouTube,

maybe I shouldn't, I need to do that.

:

00:44:33,375 --> 00:44:35,265

You, you know what, it's, 'cause

I had a podcast with Sunday.

:

00:44:35,265 --> 00:44:36,585

They beat me over the head with it.

:

00:44:36,585 --> 00:44:39,705

That you're supposed to announce

this, you gotta announce the date.

:

00:44:39,705 --> 00:44:40,845

I'm like, this is too complicated.

:

00:44:40,845 --> 00:44:41,384

I can't do it.

:

00:44:41,415 --> 00:44:43,065

So anyway, it's, it's

ingrained in my memory.

:

00:44:43,380 --> 00:44:47,070

Well, you guys, the pie, the

content you guys produce.

:

00:44:47,070 --> 00:44:48,570

I know it's hard to believe to some.

:

00:44:48,570 --> 00:44:52,620

I do do a little bit of research

before, uh, having these conversations

:

00:44:52,620 --> 00:44:54,360

and I go the double line a lot.

:

00:44:54,540 --> 00:44:55,470

All right, well, appreciate it.

:

00:44:55,500 --> 00:44:56,280

Well, thanks everybody.

:

00:44:56,280 --> 00:44:57,960

Thanks for listening and

thanks for having me back on.

:

00:44:57,960 --> 00:44:58,260

Yes.

:

00:44:58,260 --> 00:44:59,070

Thank you, Jeffrey.

:

00:44:59,070 --> 00:45:01,230

Thank you everyone for

listening to this episode.

:

00:45:01,230 --> 00:45:03,420

Is Zephyr just for Risk podcast.

:

00:45:03,420 --> 00:45:06,555

You can watch all of our other

episodes on the Zephyr YouTube channel.

:

00:45:07,410 --> 00:45:11,340

And, uh, Spotify and please be sure

to like, subscribe to those channels

:

00:45:11,340 --> 00:45:12,750

and give us a follow on LinkedIn.

:

00:45:13,050 --> 00:45:15,145

Thank you very much and have

a good rest of your week.

:

00:45:25,590 --> 00:45:26,010

Let's get started.

:

00:45:54,540 --> 00:45:55,170

Let's go.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube