Artwork for podcast Voice over Work - An Audiobook Sampler
Rest More, Learn Faster: Secrets to Mastering Any Skill (The Art of Practice by Peter Hollins)
6th December 2024 • Voice over Work - An Audiobook Sampler • Russell Newton
00:00:00 00:09:52

Share Episode

Transcripts

Speaker:

10-Minute Philosophy:

Speaker:

From Buddhism to Stoicism,

Speaker:

Confucius and Aristotle - Bite-Sized Wisdom From Some of History's Greatest Thinkers Written by

Speaker:

Patrick King

Speaker:

Narrated by Russell Newton.

Speaker:

Philosophy is one of those words that

Speaker:

function like a Rorschach test.

Speaker:

Philosophy is one of those words that

Speaker:

function like a Rorschach test.

Speaker:

A Rorschach test is otherwise known as

Speaker:

the inkblot test.

Speaker:

Certain types of psychologists show

Speaker:

their patients an ambiguous image that

Speaker:

vaguely resembles an inkwell spilled

Speaker:

onto a piece of paper to gain insight

Speaker:

into the perspectives and

Speaker:

interpretations of their patient.

Speaker:

The thought is that patients will see

Speaker:

in the ambiguous image whatever they

Speaker:

want to see in it,

Speaker:

and that is representative of how they

Speaker:

see the world,

Speaker:

their emotional state,

Speaker:

and so on.

Speaker:

Two people looking at the same blurry

Speaker:

splotch of ink can see two vastly

Speaker:

different images,

Speaker:

and it will have nothing to do with the

Speaker:

image itself.

Speaker:

And so it is with philosophy.

Speaker:

I bring this up because philosophy

Speaker:

isn’t always viewed with positivity

Speaker:

or even interest.

Speaker:

If you think of philosophy as

Speaker:

time-wasting thumb-twiddling,

Speaker:

then that is undoubtedly what you will

Speaker:

get out of it.

Speaker:

You’ll just hear a multitude of empty

Speaker:

platitudes and wonder what the point of

Speaker:

it all even is.

Speaker:

This skeptical approach is fairly

Speaker:

common and at times understandable.

Speaker:

After all,

Speaker:

what problems are being solved simply

Speaker:

by thinking and pontificating about

Speaker:

them?

Speaker:

Indeed,

Speaker:

if I’m hungry or in need of shelter

Speaker:

right now,

Speaker:

it’s difficult to see the value that

Speaker:

philosophy can add to someone’s life.

Speaker:

What tangible benefit is there to

Speaker:

figuring out the purpose of our lives?

Speaker:

Tangible?

Speaker:

Zero.

Speaker:

But philosophy was never about that.

Speaker:

If you’re looking for a field of

Speaker:

study to enrich your immediate

Speaker:

surroundings,

Speaker:

I might suggest that you pick up an

Speaker:

engineering or finance book.

Speaker:

Philosophy has always been about

Speaker:

enriching your thoughts for greater

Speaker:

happiness and fulfillment—an

Speaker:

immeasurable quantity,

Speaker:

but perhaps the greatest purpose of all.

Speaker:

Admittedly,

Speaker:

this was a mindset I also used to

Speaker:

possess.

Speaker:

If you were to create a hierarchy in

Speaker:

society,

Speaker:

especially in more ancient and brutal

Speaker:

times,

Speaker:

surely a philosopher would rank far

Speaker:

lower than the average hunter,

Speaker:

carpenter,

Speaker:

or fisherman—at least in terms of

Speaker:

pure utility.

Speaker:

What was the role of a philosopher in a

Speaker:

society beyond their teaching duties?

Speaker:

But consider how our ancestors were

Speaker:

able to figure out calculus,

Speaker:

discern the relative size of the earth,

Speaker:

and map out constellations.

Speaker:

Eventually,

Speaker:

when food and shelter weren’t

Speaker:

immediate concerns,

Speaker:

people were able to just sit and think

Speaker:

about things,

Speaker:

and this freedom of time is how humans

Speaker:

were able to advance.

Speaker:

Philosophers became repositories of

Speaker:

knowledge and discourse.

Speaker:

They became explorers,

Speaker:

discoverers,

Speaker:

and scientists.

Speaker:

It is certainly no coincidence that

Speaker:

when we look back at the lives of the

Speaker:

most famous philosophers in history,

Speaker:

they invariably were also scientists,

Speaker:

teachers,

Speaker:

and even mathematicians.

Speaker:

The human need for understanding (some

Speaker:

might say a sense of control)

Speaker:

of their surroundings is insatiable,

Speaker:

and it’s only natural that it would

Speaker:

eventually spill over from practical

Speaker:

concerns such as agriculture and

Speaker:

calculus into topics such as purpose,

Speaker:

ethics,

Speaker:

morality,

Speaker:

meaning,

Speaker:

knowledge,

Speaker:

and how to live.

Speaker:

To evoke Maslow’s hierarchy of needs,

Speaker:

once our physical and then emotional

Speaker:

needs are satisfied,

Speaker:

we will inevitably turn our attention

Speaker:

to learning,

Speaker:

wisdom,

Speaker:

exploration,

Speaker:

and fulfillment.

Speaker:

The word “philosophy” comes from

Speaker:

the Greek phrase meaning “love of

Speaker:

wisdom."

Speaker:

And who doesn’t want more wisdom?

Speaker:

Philosophers began with an intense

Speaker:

curiosity about the mysterious world

Speaker:

around them and sought out answers in

Speaker:

the only way they could.

Speaker:

They didn’t have the benefit of

Speaker:

science or technology to find answers,

Speaker:

so they had to start from ground zero

Speaker:

and use thinking,

Speaker:

reasoning,

Speaker:

and critical analysis to gain truth and

Speaker:

knowledge.

Speaker:

How might you determine why men and

Speaker:

women are different or why the sun

Speaker:

rises in the morning?

Speaker:

The only place you can start is by

Speaker:

thinking and pondering,

Speaker:

making observations,

Speaker:

and then challenging everything you

Speaker:

thought you knew.

Speaker:

This is perhaps why philosophy can

Speaker:

appear circular and redundant,

Speaker:

constantly asking Why do you know what

Speaker:

you think you know?

Speaker:

That’s all they had,

Speaker:

and you’ll get a full dose of that

Speaker:

approach when you read later on about

Speaker:

Rene Descartes.

Speaker:

They grappled with questions that we

Speaker:

still can’t prove or definitively

Speaker:

answer even with today’s

Speaker:

technological advances.

Speaker:

But this didn’t deter them.

Speaker:

What is life?

Speaker:

What is right and wrong?

Speaker:

What is our purpose?

Speaker:

How should we live our lives?

Speaker:

What is real and what is not?

Speaker:

Philosophy seeks to answer these

Speaker:

questions,

Speaker:

and by and large,

Speaker:

different schools of philosophy sprang

Speaker:

out of different answers and approaches.

Speaker:

We’re nowhere closer to objective

Speaker:

answers to any of those questions some

Speaker:

two millennia later,

Speaker:

but many perspectives have been

Speaker:

created,

Speaker:

each with the possibility of increasing

Speaker:

your happiness and fulfillment—your

Speaker:

true benefit from learning philosophy.

Speaker:

This will ultimately be the purpose of

Speaker:

this book - exploring a set of

Speaker:

approaches to fulfillment and finding

Speaker:

one that helps you find your personal

Speaker:

version of it.

Speaker:

You might find that none of the

Speaker:

approaches resonate except one.

Speaker:

In that case,

Speaker:

feel free to discard what you don’t

Speaker:

like.

Speaker:

You might find that each of them

Speaker:

resonates in their own way,

Speaker:

and in that case,

Speaker:

cobble together a Frankenstein version

Speaker:

of your approach to happiness,

Speaker:

taking bits and pieces from everything.

Speaker:

But as you will see from the following

Speaker:

thought experiment,

Speaker:

it’s not so easy as simply steering

Speaker:

your ship toward a destination.

Speaker:

The Trolley Dilemma.

Speaker:

One of the most famous philosophical

Speaker:

questions comes in the form of the

Speaker:

trolley dilemma,

Speaker:

and it is a question of ethics and

Speaker:

morality.

Speaker:

You can think of this problem as

Speaker:

determining what is moral and what is

Speaker:

not,

Speaker:

for yourself and others.

Speaker:

In doing so,

Speaker:

you might find that your idea of

Speaker:

morality directly conflicts with that

Speaker:

of others.

Speaker:

It was originally developed as a

Speaker:

thought experiment by Philippa Foot in

Speaker:

1967 and adapted by Judith Thomson

Speaker:

afterward,

Speaker:

and the nature of any dilemma is that

Speaker:

it produces different answers that

Speaker:

demand to be examined.

Speaker:

There is fertile ground for

Speaker:

disagreement and exploration of

Speaker:

different interpretations.

Speaker:

Each different answer underlies a

Speaker:

different set of values and formative

Speaker:

life experiences.

Speaker:

Imagine you are standing beside some

Speaker:

trolley tracks.

Speaker:

You see a runaway trolley screaming

Speaker:

down the tracks toward five workers who

Speaker:

are facing away from it and don’t

Speaker:

hear it coming.

Speaker:

Even if they miraculously become aware

Speaker:

of their imminent mortality,

Speaker:

they are still doomed to their deaths.

Speaker:

You are an innocent bystander,

Speaker:

and you fortunately have some knowledge

Speaker:

of how trolley tracks work.

Speaker:

You see a lever that is connected to

Speaker:

the tracks within touching distance,

Speaker:

and you realize that if you were to

Speaker:

pull the lever,

Speaker:

the trolley would be diverted down a

Speaker:

second set of tracks and the five

Speaker:

workers would be saved.

Speaker:

However—and this is where the dilemma

Speaker:

comes in—you would be diverting the

Speaker:

trolley down a track that would kill

Speaker:

one worker.

Speaker:

So would you pull the lever and save

Speaker:

five people at the expense of one?

Speaker:

Would you even act?

Speaker:

Could you think in a utilitarian way

Speaker:

and reason to yourself that you are

Speaker:

actually saving four lives?

Speaker:

And would any of those types of

Speaker:

thinking affect the amount of guilt you

Speaker:

might feel?

Speaker:

What about if you didn’t move a

Speaker:

muscle—would you be morally wrong for

Speaker:

complete inaction?

Speaker:

What if you didn’t want to be

Speaker:

responsible for making any decision at

Speaker:

all?

Speaker:

What if you believed in fatalism and

Speaker:

the matter being out of your hands?

Speaker:

What if you thought that one life was

Speaker:

equal to four lives in the grand scheme

Speaker:

of things,

Speaker:

so why bother?

Speaker:

There is no wrong answer.

Speaker:

The trolley itself becomes a substitute

Speaker:

for people and forces you to think

Speaker:

through the consequences and whether

Speaker:

the rightness or wrongness of an action

Speaker:

is determined solely by the outcome or

Speaker:

by the intentions.

Speaker:

In studies and surveys,

Speaker:

it turns out most people would pull the

Speaker:

lever and divert the trolley to kill

Speaker:

one person while sparing five.

Speaker:

It seems that instinctually we are

Speaker:

mostly utilitarians at heart and will

Speaker:

do what is best for the greatest number

Speaker:

of people.

Speaker:

But does that mean we would sacrifice

Speaker:

ourselves in order to let a boatful of

Speaker:

children live?

Speaker:

What if the five workers were all

Speaker:

convicted murderers and the single

Speaker:

worker was on par with Mother

Speaker:

Teresa’s impact?

Speaker:

What if they were five elderly people

Speaker:

with raging cancer?

Speaker:

The permutations of what these choices

Speaker:

can mean and what they say about us are

Speaker:

endless.

Speaker:

There are no correct or incorrect

Speaker:

answers when you are seeking to gain

Speaker:

wisdom and knowledge—even an answer

Speaker:

that says “I would try to make sure

Speaker:

all six people are killed” is not

Speaker:

incorrect and provides a valid

Speaker:

perspective.

Speaker:

We all inherently want to do good,

Speaker:

for ourselves and others—or do we?

Speaker:

If this is starting to sound confusing,

Speaker:

welcome to your quick introduction to

Speaker:

philosophical thinking.

Speaker:

The trolley dilemma is merely an

Speaker:

example of the type of information and

Speaker:

knowledge we can gain from simple

Speaker:

pondering and thinking;

Speaker:

it’s far from a useless pursuit,

Speaker:

as these types of considerations

Speaker:

influence law,

Speaker:

policy,

Speaker:

and decisions on both conscious and

Speaker:

subconscious levels.

Speaker:

In this case,

Speaker:

you are forced to explore what it means

Speaker:

to be ethical and moral.

Speaker:

You will see that there is no such

Speaker:

thing as a simple answer inside of a

Speaker:

vacuum.

Speaker:

Philosophical thinking may not provide

Speaker:

tangible benefits in itself,

Speaker:

but the process you use to get there

Speaker:

certainly will.

Speaker:

Philosophy Is About Thinking.

Speaker:

What kind of approach do you need in

Speaker:

order to have any hope of making sense

Speaker:

of the trolley dilemma?

Speaker:

For starters,

Speaker:

you need a sense of analysis,

Speaker:

logic,

Speaker:

organization,

Speaker:

and the overall ability to think in

Speaker:

terms of consequences and implications.

Speaker:

When you go down one thread of thought,

Speaker:

what are the considerations that arise

Speaker:

from it,

Speaker:

why do they exist,

Speaker:

and what do they lead to?

Speaker:

If that leads to a dead end,

Speaker:

then you need to be able to backtrack

Speaker:

and explore other perspectives with

Speaker:

thoroughness.

Speaker:

Philosophy requires the unfiltered

Speaker:

skill of critical thinking and analysis.

Speaker:

It’s something that we constantly pay

Speaker:

lip service to but don’t really delve

Speaker:

into the meaning of.

Speaker:

Unfortunately this does take

Speaker:

considerable effort,

Speaker:

as it runs counter to how our brains

Speaker:

are wired.

Speaker:

Philosophy is about the pursuit of

Speaker:

thinking,

Speaker:

and it teaches analysis of arguments,

Speaker:

logical constructions,

Speaker:

and critical reasoning.

Speaker:

It teaches cognitive biases and logical

Speaker:

fallacies,

Speaker:

as well as a sense of discovery

Speaker:

because,

Speaker:

as you can see,

Speaker:

no one answer is ever enough.

Speaker:

You must always go deeper;

Speaker:

there is always a next level down to

Speaker:

explore.

Speaker:

Your view is always limited and biased;

Speaker:

how can you take on a different

Speaker:

perspective?

Speaker:

While it may sound tedious,

Speaker:

for the lover of wisdom,

Speaker:

it’s a good thing.

Speaker:

You’ll challenge your own point of

Speaker:

view and understand why others have

Speaker:

merit.

Speaker:

For instance,

Speaker:

in the trolley dilemma,

Speaker:

it’s about solving a problem with no

Speaker:

real answer.

Speaker:

With philosophy,

Speaker:

you gain creative problem-solving

Speaker:

skills.

Speaker:

You learn to organize and classify

Speaker:

information in a multitude of ways,

Speaker:

all useful to a particular purpose.

Speaker:

You’ll learn how to construct an

Speaker:

argument and identify points that say

Speaker:

what they are representing,

Speaker:

as well as those that are basically

Speaker:

deceptions.

Speaker:

Perhaps the greatest and most adaptable

Speaker:

skill you gain from philosophy is the

Speaker:

ability to function and even thrive in

Speaker:

the ambiguous.

Speaker:

This is something else that we are

Speaker:

wired against—we typically want

Speaker:

certainty,

Speaker:

especially in the face of a question or

Speaker:

problem.

Speaker:

But in philosophy,

Speaker:

there are no true answers,

Speaker:

only multiple valid perspectives.

Speaker:

Where does that leave you?

Speaker:

Needing to cultivate a set of

Speaker:

techniques to question and understand

Speaker:

deeper—these are the wandering and

Speaker:

circuitous thoughts that appear to lead

Speaker:

to nowhere to the casual observer but

Speaker:

in reality are drilling down deep into

Speaker:

knowledge and wisdom.

Speaker:

With this ability comes a certain

Speaker:

open-mindedness of what each different

Speaker:

perspective entails.

Speaker:

That’s something that no one is born

Speaker:

with and that we must gain through

Speaker:

practice.

Speaker:

So if you are skeptical about why you

Speaker:

might want to pick this book up or read

Speaker:

on,

Speaker:

there are very real benefits to

Speaker:

learning philosophy—just not if

Speaker:

you’re hungry or in need of a place

Speaker:

to sleep in the rain.

Speaker:

Life is not typically certain or

Speaker:

concrete,

Speaker:

so abstract thinking will assist you

Speaker:

considerably.

Speaker:

Yet this still pales in comparison to

Speaker:

the value of finding your life

Speaker:

philosophy,

Speaker:

a personalized path to fulfillment and

Speaker:

happiness based on some of history’s

Speaker:

greatest thinkers.

Speaker:

What’s Your Life Philosophy?

Speaker:

Philosophy gives you hard skills,

Speaker:

some might even say marketable and

Speaker:

employable skills—even if a degree in

Speaker:

philosophy is not known as such.

Speaker:

But philosophy arguably gives you the

Speaker:

most important thing you can have as a

Speaker:

person—clarity on your own views,

Speaker:

values,

Speaker:

and perspectives.

Speaker:

And it’s only through understanding

Speaker:

those aspects that you can understand

Speaker:

how to create the best life for

Speaker:

yourself.

Speaker:

How did you answer the trolley dilemma?

Speaker:

Would you have pulled that lever?

Speaker:

What went through your head as you made

Speaker:

your decision?

Speaker:

That’s who you are at the current

Speaker:

moment,

Speaker:

for better or worse.

Speaker:

That’s where you stand on the

Speaker:

spectrum of morality and ethics.

Speaker:

It may just be a simple yes or no on

Speaker:

pulling the lever,

Speaker:

but it speaks to so much more of how

Speaker:

you view the world and your place in it.

Speaker:

Your actions stem from your values and

Speaker:

morals,

Speaker:

and it behooves you to understand why

Speaker:

you do the things you do.

Speaker:

Philosophy imparts self-understanding,

Speaker:

one of the rarest qualities in the

Speaker:

world.

Speaker:

You understand what appeals to you and

Speaker:

what you simply couldn’t care less

Speaker:

about.

Speaker:

From self-understanding,

Speaker:

you can build the life you want.

Speaker:

Imagine if a doctor were to prescribe a

Speaker:

course of antibiotics based on only the

Speaker:

symptoms and not the causes of an

Speaker:

illness.

Speaker:

That’s what we are dealing with if we

Speaker:

lack self-understanding.

Speaker:

This is what I would refer to as a life

Speaker:

philosophy—a code of behavior and

Speaker:

mindsets that you seek to live your

Speaker:

life by to optimize your happiness.

Speaker:

They are rules you set for yourself to

Speaker:

fulfill your values on a daily basis.

Speaker:

The simplest example is someone who

Speaker:

endlessly pursues money to the

Speaker:

detriment of their relationships.

Speaker:

Clearly their philosophy is oriented on

Speaker:

wealth,

Speaker:

and they gain self-worth from it—even

Speaker:

if they don’t know it or want to

Speaker:

admit it.

Speaker:

If they know it,

Speaker:

they can orient themselves toward what

Speaker:

fulfills them and avoid that which does

Speaker:

not.

Speaker:

It’s all we are really looking for in

Speaker:

life.

Speaker:

Everyone has a life philosophy,

Speaker:

but most don’t know they do,

Speaker:

and even fewer are able to describe it.

Speaker:

If you were to ask someone,

Speaker:

it would most likely be someone

Speaker:

else’s philosophy parroted back at

Speaker:

you.

Speaker:

This is simply because most of us

Speaker:

don’t know who we are or what we want

Speaker:

from life.

Speaker:

We are directionless,

Speaker:

or we simply float through the path of

Speaker:

least resistance and pain.

Speaker:

A life philosophy helps you avoid all

Speaker:

that by clarifying what is and is not

Speaker:

important.

Speaker:

That is the biggest benefit of the

Speaker:

study of philosophy,

Speaker:

and indeed this book seeks to provide

Speaker:

the life philosophies of some pretty

Speaker:

sharp thinkers to emulate or disregard.

Speaker:

What was Aristotle’s take on

Speaker:

happiness and fulfillment,

Speaker:

and how does that compare to Marcus

Speaker:

Aurelius’s or Confucius’s?

Speaker:

Does the life philosophy of stoicism

Speaker:

align with your values more,

Speaker:

or do you prefer the principles of

Speaker:

Taoism?

Speaker:

What texts shed light on what’s

Speaker:

important to you,

Speaker:

what you want to avoid,

Speaker:

and what you want to emulate?

Speaker:

Surely we can learn from these titans

Speaker:

of thought.

Speaker:

Living without a life philosophy is

Speaker:

like sailing a boat without a map,

Speaker:

engine,

Speaker:

or even end destination in mind.

Speaker:

You’re probably seeking contentment

Speaker:

and happiness,

Speaker:

but you don’t know where it is.

Speaker:

You don’t know what direction

Speaker:

you’re headed in,

Speaker:

and even if you knew,

Speaker:

you would have no way to change course.

Speaker:

You simply drift according to life’s

Speaker:

external forces on you.

Speaker:

You might come to the frightening

Speaker:

realization that you’ve spent your

Speaker:

life drifting toward things you don’t

Speaker:

care about.

Speaker:

You haven’t chosen your own path;

Speaker:

you’ve just acted as a vessel for the

Speaker:

people and context surrounding you.

Speaker:

Learn about yourself,

Speaker:

discover what is important,

Speaker:

take responsibility for your own

Speaker:

fulfillment,

Speaker:

and directly pursue your own definition

Speaker:

of happiness.

Speaker:

Every small daily action acts to put us

Speaker:

either further or closer to the correct

Speaker:

course.

Speaker:

While an educational tour through some

Speaker:

of history’s greatest beliefs,

Speaker:

10-Minute Philosophy is ultimately

Speaker:

about better and happier living.

Speaker:

It would be foolish if we didn’t look

Speaker:

into the past and borrow from ancient

Speaker:

people’s wisdom and apply it to our

Speaker:

own modern lives.

Speaker:

Each of the philosophies in this book

Speaker:

has undergone thousands of years of

Speaker:

scrutiny and has emerged intact.

Speaker:

If you take away our modern

Speaker:

trappings—electricity,

Speaker:

Internet,

Speaker:

and jet planes—not much has changed

Speaker:

about us.

Speaker:

Humans are still perpetually in search

Speaker:

of happiness and fulfillment.

Speaker:

A final note before we start - this is

Speaker:

not meant to be an in-depth primer on

Speaker:

multiple sets of religions,

Speaker:

philosophies,

Speaker:

and belief systems.

Speaker:

It is an introduction (10 minutes,

Speaker:

so to speak)

Speaker:

of what these philosophies espouse and

Speaker:

how you might be able to fit them into

Speaker:

your life for a boost of happiness and

Speaker:

fulfillment.

Speaker:

Of course,

Speaker:

ancient beliefs cannot be distilled,

Speaker:

but all it takes is a single thought or

Speaker:

shift of mindset to dramatically alter

Speaker:

your life.

Speaker:

Think of it as a shot glass of instant

Speaker:

wisdom for your review.

Speaker:

Not everything is covered in grinding

Speaker:

detail,

Speaker:

and concepts have been left out

Speaker:

purposefully for clarity’s sake.

Speaker:

We have one goal here—find a helpful

Speaker:

path to happiness.

Speaker:

Takeaways -

Speaker:

•Philosophy means different things to

Speaker:

different people,

Speaker:

so I would like to present what it

Speaker:

means to me.

Speaker:

It’s about self-understanding and

Speaker:

then taking and stealing from some of

Speaker:

history’s greatest thinkers to form

Speaker:

the basis of what makes you happy.

Speaker:

It’s only when you understand

Speaker:

yourself that you can move forward in a

Speaker:

way that is more likely to lead to your

Speaker:

happiness.

Speaker:

In other words,

Speaker:

clearer thinking leads to

Speaker:

self-understanding,

Speaker:

which leads to your life philosophy

Speaker:

emerging.

Speaker:

Formulating your own life philosophy is

Speaker:

key to the life you want,

Speaker:

and it influences all of your daily

Speaker:

actions,

Speaker:

big and small.

Speaker:

•The trolley dilemma is a

Speaker:

demonstration of the other major

Speaker:

benefit of delving into philosophical

Speaker:

thought.

Speaker:

You learn how to think.

Speaker:

You learn how to argue,

Speaker:

debate,

Speaker:

and reason.

Speaker:

You learn how a seemingly innocent or

Speaker:

simple question can have wide-ranging

Speaker:

implications and consequences.

Speaker:

You can learn to thrive in the

Speaker:

ungrounded,

Speaker:

abstract,

Speaker:

and ambiguous.

Speaker:

And when you direct this thinking

Speaker:

toward deeper questions that philosophy

Speaker:

presents,

Speaker:

you can begin to understand yourself

Speaker:

more than ever before.

Speaker:

•Philosophy won’t directly feed

Speaker:

your family or put a roof over your

Speaker:

head,

Speaker:

but indirectly,

Speaker:

it leads to all that and more.

Speaker:

This has been

Speaker:

10-Minute Philosophy:

Speaker:

From Buddhism to Stoicism,

Speaker:

Confucius and Aristotle - Bite-Sized Wisdom From Some of History's Greatest Thinkers Written by

Speaker:

Patrick King

Speaker:

Narrated by Russell Newton.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube