Most burnout isn't caused by workload—it's caused by misalignment. That uncomfortable truth emerged from a live Leadership Lab session where chefs gathered to confront the weight they'd been carrying that wasn't actually theirs to hold.

Register for The Leadership Lab

"Naming the problem automatically means you are owning it. You can't name it and walk away."

In this episode of Chef Life Radio, we explore the profound difference between leadership defined by frantic motion and leadership anchored in grounded presence. What you'll hear isn't motivation or theory—it's the raw clarity that surfaces when chefs slow down long enough to tell the truth about where they're misaligned.

The Weight That Doesn't Belong to You

Discover the two types of misalignment that drain culinary leaders:

1. External disconnect between expectations and reality of your resources
2. Internal chasm between your current role and internalized ideals
3. Why fighting the reality of your job creates constant subconscious struggle.

Through real examples from the session, we examine how a high-volume operations manager can exhaust themselves trying to be a bespoke artisan chef, and why that identity conflict becomes the true source of burnout.

AB Techniccal College | Culinary Program

The Leadership Loop for Permanent Change

Learn the five-step framework that moves you from seeing dysfunction to enacting lasting transformation:

1. Sensing problems through presence and attention
2. Naming issues (which automatically means owning them)
3. Communicating clearly without system blaming
4. Modeling the correct behavior yourself
5. Holding the line when integrity conflicts with keeping people comfortable

From Effort Extraction to Presence

Explore how successful chefs identified their version of "unnecessary spreadsheets"—those extra tasks we create to validate our worth through visible effort rather than actual impact:

1. Why over-delivering often serves our need for validation, not client needs
2. The difference between motion and meaningful progress
3. How to ground leadership in clarity instead of excessive effort

The Power of Choice You've Been Avoiding

Confront the terrifying reality that you still have agency in your career and life. We examine why inaction feels safer than acknowledging choice, and how old agreements made years ago continue dictating your present reality without conscious review.

The conversation reveals why beating yourself up over past choices is unproductive, and how context changes everything about what decisions serve you now.

Operational Definitions That Set You Free

Through the story of a chef whose company is literally called "Culinary Mechanic," discover how accepting the reality of your role—rather than fighting for a romanticized ideal—becomes the foundation for authentic leadership.

When you operationally define your position with crystal clarity, you stop spending energy on identity conflicts and start actually leading within your reality.

Small Structural Changes, Big Identity Shifts

Learn practical, grounded steps for embodying this clarity:

1. Creating formalized closure processes to prevent carrying outcomes that aren't yours
2. Setting visible time limits on non-core tasks
3. Replacing "shoulds" with "is" through consistent small actions

This episode demonstrates how we use tools like generative AI not to replace thinking or automate leadership, but to help chefs hear themselves more clearly and hold onto clarity once it surfaces. When your words come back to you from a new angle, it changes how deep the insight goes.

Whether you're questioning if the problem is the work or something deeper, feeling misaligned despite working harder than ever, or ready to stop confusing motion with leadership, this conversation offers a different way forward—one grounded in presence rather than performance.

Ready to stop carrying weight that doesn't belong to you?

This might be the orientation shift that changes everything.

Register for The Leadership Lab

• Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College Culinary Program
• Carolina Health & Wellness
• The Chef Life Brigade | The Leadership Lab - Free | Live | 2th Tuesday of the Month - Sign up Today
• The Chef Life Brigade | JOIN - Get 30 Days Free with Coupon Code BetaThanks
• The Chef Life Brigade | Culinary Community

Adam M LambChef Life Media LLC

Support this Podcast

Welcome to the Deep Dive.

Today we're gonna be taking all those complex insights, all that hard won

clarity from the Culinary Leadership Lab and really locking them into place.

This is tailored reinforcement designed specifically for you.

Exactly.

Our goal here is absolute precision.

This isn't about general motivation.

We've, uh, we've.

Distilled a stack of really powerful reflections from that session.

Yeah.

Right.

And our mission now is to just reinforce that essential leadership insight.

Yeah.

And I think to clearly name the mindset shift that's required

for long-term identity alignment.

And it all really came down to a core paradox, didn't it?

Yeah.

This distinction between leadership defined by, well, frantic effort.

Yeah.

Notion and leadership anchored in a grounded presence.

The ultimate lesson was that leadership starts with how you

carry yourself through the day, not how much weight you try to carry.

And to even begin addressing that, the session had to establish a very,

um, a very specific working container.

We agreed, we weren't there to fix, rescue or give advice, which is hard.

It is that restriction itself is the first signal of the shift

because we're all so used to jumping straight to solutions, even when

we don't really know the problem.

The sources emphasized that before you can solve anything, you have to locate the

weight you're carrying that isn't yours.

Okay, so let's unpack that root problem immediately.

The foundational realization from the lab was it was incredibly stark.

Most burnout is not from workload, but it's from misalignment.

That's a huge claim.

It suggests, you know, just changing your hours isn't gonna solve the core issue.

It's not about volume, it's about friction.

The source material details, two main types of misalignment.

The first is external.

You know, a disconnect between the expectations placed on you,

stated or unstated, right, and the reality of your resources.

But the second type, the one that truly, truly drains leaders,

mm, is entirely internal.

Okay?

Here's where it gets really interesting for you listening.

Adam Lamb pointed out that this internal misalignment is this,

uh, chasm between your current reality and an internalized ideal.

For example, you might be a high volume factory manager in your day-to-day

role running a massive operation.

Your self perception, your internal ideal is telling you that you should

be a high-end bespoke chef focused on artistry, and that just creates

this constant subconscious struggle.

Every single day you are fighting the reality of your job because

it doesn't align with the identity you believe you should have.

Right?

That gap, that feeling of being an imposter in your own role, that is the

true weight that leads to exhaustion no matter how many hours you work.

So how do you resolve that?

How do you stop fighting reality?

Tony brought up the absolute necessity of operational definitions.

This is so key.

It is.

If you're running a team or a business, what does that actually mean in practice?

An operational definition, it just means.

Both parties, you and the organization have to be crystal clear and aligned on

the specific focus, the priorities, and crucially the boundaries of the role.

Because without that clarity, well, without it, even the most talented

people are just set up for failure.

They end up trying to be all things to all people.

We saw that emotional clarity in Simon's realization.

I mean, his company's called Culinary Mechanic, and he had to confront

the raw fact that so much of his time was spent being, and this

was his term, a theft mechanic.

Just managing logistics systems, processes.

Exactly.

And that identity was in direct conflict with the romanticized ideal of the

chef that he was carrying around.

But that confrontation.

Hmm.

It's liberating, isn't it?

Once he operationally defined his role as a mechanic who fixes systems, he could

stop spending energy, fighting reality and start actually leading within it.

It gave him permission.

It did permission to prioritize fixing the systems, which is what the business

needed rather than chasing this, uh, this identity of artistry, which was

just an internal demand that shift.

From fighting the role to owning the definition of it, that's

the first step toward presence.

That makes perfect sense.

And once you clarify the internal role, the next logical step is to address

how you interact with the external system, which takes us to the framework

for that Adam Lamb's leadership loop.

Yes, the loop, it provides a really necessary structure

for leaders to move from.

You know, seeing dysfunction to actually enacting permanent

change, it has five steps.

Starting with sensing a problem, which just requires presence, paying attention.

That's it.

Then you move to naming it, and the sources made a huge point here.

Naming the problem automatically means you are owning it.

You can't just name it and walk away.

No, you can't name a problem and then delegate the responsibility

for its solution, or, uh, the consequences of naming it.

It prevents system blaming.

Oh, okay.

When you own the problem, you name, you stop waiting for someone else

to fix the culture or the structure.

It puts the responsibility for modeling the change squarely on your shoulders.

So after naming and owning, you communicate it and then you have to

model the correct behavior yourself.

Exactly.

And those first four steps, sensing, naming, communicating, modeling,

they're challenging enough.

Hmm.

But the sources all emphasize that the real difficulty, the true test

of presence is that final step.

Holding the line.

Holding the line.

And why is that so hard?

Because it requires you to face friction, head on.

As the lab session revealed, keeping people happy is not necessarily the

same thing as providing a safe, fair, and equitable environment, right?

So if you try to create an equitable environment, let's say, by enforcing

a new rule that everyone clocks out on time, no more mandatory, over time, you

might get pushback, you will get pushed.

From high performers who like to overwork or from managers who feel

their safety buffer is now gone, and that initial discomfort, that

means you're choosing integrity and long-term health over short-term

emotional comfort for other people.

Exactly.

And that willingness to prioritize integrity over momentary happiness

requires a profound grounding in presence.

Which brings us right to the core mindset shift.

The coaching session was targeting, moving away from extracting

self-worth from effort and anchoring it in presence and clarity.

Let's look at the honesty in those reflections about unnecessary weight.

Simon, again, he talked about constantly over-delivering in his

coaching role, the spreadsheets, creating these elaborate non-core

deliverables like spreadsheets for clients that hadn't even asked for them.

He recognized he was prioritizing motion over impact.

He was trying to prove his worth through the sheer visibility of his work.

The value wasn't being extracted by the client from the spreadsheet

it was being extracted by Simon from the effort of creating it.

It's a self validation mechanism.

Totally disguises excellent service.

He realized his self-worth was dependent on his effort.

Not on the client's actual needs or the results.

And if you're listening, we all have our version of Simon's spreadsheets, don't we?

That extra email, that report, that's way too detailed.

The non-core task we tackle just to feel busy.

It's universal.

Now, contrast that internal extraction with Tony's' challenge,

which was more external.

Tony struggled with carrying the emotional weight of outcomes

after he'd provided consultation.

Ah.

He could give perfect advice, but then he'd ruminate over whether the

client implemented it successfully or if the result was perfect.

That's the external personalization of failure.

You've done your job, you've modeled the behavior, but you can't control the

client system or their follow through, and that inability to control the result

becomes a huge source of stress, is the ultimate source of emotional clutter.

Tony had to consciously practice the phrase, not my circus, not my monkeys,

just to create emotional boundaries.

So the synthesis of both Simons, his effort extraction, and Tony's outcome

personalization is the key reinforcement.

Stop seeking internal fulfillment through excessive effort and stop seeking external

validation through controlling results.

Instead, ground your leadership in presence and clarity.

So the shift isn't about being lazy?

Not at all.

No.

It's about ensuring every single unit of effort is perfectly aligned with the

operational goal and that it isn't being used as a crutch for your self-worth.

Yeah.

When you were present, you know, what's yours to hold and what

belongs to the system or the client?

That's identity alignment in action.

Yeah.

And that realization of.

Personal agency of what you control and what you don't.

That brings us to the final and maybe the most challenging part

of the coaching conversation.

The power of choice.

Hmm.

The sources referenced that anecdote about a woman at a retreat who feared

that real transformation, real deep seated change, might ultimately

lead to her leaving her husband.

Right, and that just illustrates the sheer terror of admitting

you still have a choice.

It's terrifying.

Okay?

Because choice carries risk, it's emotionally easier to feel trapped,

to believe the path is already dictated, because then you eliminate

the risk of making the wrong decision.

You sacrifice future freedom for present comfort.

That's it.

And that's why inaction is often the path of least resistance.

But what the leaders in the lab understood is that our current inaction is usually

dictated by choices or agreements we made years ago that we've just.

We've never revisited precisely, and that's what makes Simon's

anchor point so powerful.

The core question always, always returns to what's the goal?

If your choices don't support that stated goal, they are misalignment.

Fuel progress depends entirely on unconsciously reviewing those

old unchallenged agreements that are now dictating your life.

Which requires that first principle thinking, Adam Lamb mentioned.

You have to break things down to their fundamental nature without assumptions.

And I think Adam was saying that beating yourself up over a past choice

is just unproductive, of course, because a choice that was valid

then might no longer be valid today.

Context changes everything.

Right?

And Tony added to this emphasizing that finding peace isn't about

sticking to one single answer.

It comes from understanding the system.

The current context, the choices you made when you were a chaotic floater.

Yeah.

Manager are probably irrelevant now that you're building a structured new company.

You have to be present enough to assess the rules of the room now.

And that just ties it all together, doesn't it?

The central lesson is the importance of slowing down, of being present

to ask questions in the moment.

Rather than operating on old assumptions, old choices, or old definitions of

who you should be, you have to be present to the reality of the room,

not the memory of a past kitchen.

And when you're truly present, you're grounded.

And the need for all that excessive effort, it just melts away because

you're operating from a place of clarity.

So let's bring this all back to you, the listener.

We've reinforced the core insight.

Leadership is defined by presence.

How you carry yourself and clarity, achieving those operational definitions

using first principle thinking.

It is not defined by the magnitude of effort or the amount of weight you carry.

So what's the practical, grounded step forward?

The session ended by asking for one small way.

I can embody that this week.

It can't be a massive overhaul.

It has to be a single structural change.

Okay, for Tony, he suggested action was to create a formalized feedback

or close your email template to send when he leaves a project.

That small structural action creates an emotional boundary.

It documents her input and it prevents her from carrying the

outcome into the next week.

And for Simon, it meant setting rigorous visible time limits on those

non-core, over-delivering tasks, these small, consistent actions.

They replace the compulsion for unnecessary motion.

With the power of being intentionally grounded, you replace the shoulds with

the is, and these are the small ways you shift your identity over the long term.

You're embodying the clarity you've gained.

The clarity is what changes the weight of the day, and the true measure of a

successful chef or a successful leader.

It's defined by their version of success, not by external expectations

or old internalized ideals.

Clarity is enough.

It's enough to start shifting how you carry your days, your team, and yourself.

If you're present enough to define success on your own terms, what previously

felt like overwhelming identity, draining weight, it simply becomes a

manageable part of the day's reality.

The power to choose that new reality is and always has been Yours.