Artwork for podcast Bite at a Time Books
Les Miserables - Volume 1 - Book 2 - Chapter 7
Episode 215th May 2024 • Bite at a Time Books • Bree Carlile
00:00:00 00:23:15

Share Episode

Shownotes

Join Host Bree Carlile as she reads the twenty-first chapter of Les Miserables.

Come with us as we release one bite a day of one of your favorite classic novels, plays & short stories. Bree reads these classics like she reads to her daughter, one chapter a day. If you love books or audiobooks and want something to listen to as you're getting ready, driving to work, or as you're getting ready for bed, check out Bite at a Time Books!

Follow, rate, and review Bite at a Time Books where we read you your favorite classics, one bite at a time. Available wherever you listen to podcasts.

Check out our website, or join our Facebook Group!

Get exclusive Behind the Scenes content on our YouTube!

We are now part of the Bite at a Time Books Productions network!

If you ever wondered what inspired your favorite classic novelist to write their stories, what was happening in their lives or the world at the time, check out Bite at a Time Books Behind the Story wherever you listen to podcasts.

Follow us on all the socials: Instagram - Twitter - Facebook - TikTok

Follow Bree at: Instagram - Twitter - Facebook

Transcripts

Speaker:

>> Speaker A: Take a look, in the book and let's see

Speaker:

what we can find.

Speaker:

Take it chapter by chapter. One

Speaker:

fight at a time

Speaker:

so many adventures and mountains we

Speaker:

can climb

Speaker:

to give word for word, line by

Speaker:

line, one bite at a time.

Speaker:

>> Brie Carlisle: Welcome.

Speaker:

>> Brie Carlisle: To bite at a time books where we read you your favorite

Speaker:

classics, one byte at a time. my name is Bre

Speaker:

Carlisle and I love to read and wanted to share

Speaker:

my passion with listeners like you. If you want to

Speaker:

know whats coming next and vote on upcoming books,

Speaker:

sign up for our newsletter@byteatamebooks.com

Speaker:

dot. Youll also find our new t shirts in

Speaker:

the shop, including podcast shirts and

Speaker:

quote shirts from your favorite classic novels.

Speaker:

Be sure to follow my show on your favorite podcast

Speaker:

platform so you get all the new episodes. You can

Speaker:

find most of our links in the show notes, but also

Speaker:

our website, byteadatimebooks.com includes all

Speaker:

of the links for our show, including to our

Speaker:

Patreon to support the show and YouTube, where

Speaker:

we have special behind the narration of the episodes.

Speaker:

We are part of the Byte at a Time Books productions

Speaker:

network. If youd also like to hear what

Speaker:

inspired your favorite classic authors to write their

Speaker:

novels and what was going on in the world at the

Speaker:

time, check out the bite at a time books behind

Speaker:

the story podcast. Wherever you listen to

Speaker:

podcasts, please note, while we

Speaker:

try to keep the text as close to the original as possible,

Speaker:

some words have been changed to honor the

Speaker:

marginalized communities whove identified the words as

Speaker:

harmful and to stay in alignment with byte

Speaker:

at a time books brand.

Speaker:

>> Brie Carlisle: Values today well be

Speaker:

continuing.

Speaker:

Les Miserable by Victor Hugo

Speaker:

chapter seven the interior of

Speaker:

despair let us try

Speaker:

to say it. It is necessary that

Speaker:

society should look at these things because it is itself

Speaker:

which creates them. he was, as we have said, an

Speaker:

ignorant man, but he was not a fool.

Speaker:

The light of nature was ignited in him.

Speaker:

Unhappiness, which also possesses a clearness of vision

Speaker:

of its own, augmented the small amount of daylight

Speaker:

which existed in this mind beneath the

Speaker:

cudgel, beneath the chain, in the cell,

Speaker:

in hardship, beneath the burning sun of the

Speaker:

galleys, upon the plank bed of the convict,

Speaker:

he withdrew into his own consciousness and

Speaker:

meditated. He constituted himself the

Speaker:

tribunal. He began by putting himself on

Speaker:

trial. He recognized the fact that he was

Speaker:

not an innocent man, unjustly punished.

Speaker:

He admitted that he had committed an extreme and

Speaker:

blameworthy act, that that loaf of bread

Speaker:

would probably not have been refused to him had he asked for

Speaker:

it. That in any case, it would have

Speaker:

been better to wait until he could get it through compassion or through

Speaker:

work. That it is not an unanswerable argument to

Speaker:

say, can one wait when one is

Speaker:

hungry. That in the first place,

Speaker:

it is very rare for anyone to die of hunger

Speaker:

literally. Next. That

Speaker:

fortunately or unfortunately. Man, is so

Speaker:

constituted that he can suffer long and much,

Speaker:

both morally and physically, without dying.

Speaker:

That it is therefore necessary to have patience.

Speaker:

That that would even have been better for those poor little children.

Speaker:

That it had been an act of madness for him,

Speaker:

a miserable, unfortunate wretch. To take

Speaker:

society at large, violently by the collar. And

Speaker:

to imagine that one can escape from misery through theft.

Speaker:

That that is, in any case, a poor door through which

Speaker:

to escape from misery. Through which infamy enters.

Speaker:

In short, that he was in the wrong.

Speaker:

Then he asked himself whether he had been the only one

Speaker:

in fault in his fatal history. Whether it was not

Speaker:

a serious thing that he, a laborer out

Speaker:

of work. That he, an industrious man,

Speaker:

should have lacked bread. And whether the fault,

Speaker:

once committed and confessed a

Speaker:

chastisement. Had not been ferocious and

Speaker:

disproportioned. Whether there had not been more abuse

Speaker:

on the part of the law in respect to the penalty.

Speaker:

Than m there had been on the part of the culprit in respect to his

Speaker:

faultwhether there had not been an excess of

Speaker:

weights in one balance of the scale, in the one

Speaker:

which contains expiation. Whether the

Speaker:

overweight of the penalty. Was not equivalent to the annihilation

Speaker:

of the crime. And did not result in reversing the

Speaker:

situation. Of replacing the fault of the delinquent

Speaker:

by the fault of the repression. Of converting the

Speaker:

guilty man into the victim and the debtor into

Speaker:

the creditor. And arranging the law

Speaker:

definitively on the side of the man who had violated it.

Speaker:

Whether this penalty, complicated,

Speaker:

by successive aggravations for attempts at escape.

Speaker:

Had not ended in becoming a sort of outrage.

Speaker:

Perpetrated by the stronger upon the feebler.

Speaker:

A crime of society against the individual.

Speaker:

A crime which was being committed afresh every

Speaker:

day. A crime which had lasted 19

Speaker:

years. He asked himself whether human

Speaker:

society could have the right. To force its members to suffer equally.

Speaker:

In one case for its own unreasonable lack of

Speaker:

foresight. And in the other case, for

Speaker:

its pitiless foresight. And to seize a

Speaker:

poor man forever. Between a defect and an

Speaker:

excess, a default of work and an excess

Speaker:

of punishment. Whether it was not

Speaker:

outrageous for society to treat thus precisely those of

Speaker:

its members. Who were the least well endowed. In the division of

Speaker:

goods made by chance. And consequently,

Speaker:

the most deserving of consideration.

Speaker:

These questions put and answered. He

Speaker:

judged society and condemned it. He

Speaker:

condemned it to his hatred. He made it responsible

Speaker:

for the fate which he was suffering. And he said to himself that it

Speaker:

might be that one day he should not

Speaker:

hesitate to call it to account. He declared to

Speaker:

himself that there was no equilibrium between the harm which

Speaker:

he had caused and the harm which was being done to

Speaker:

him. He finally arrived at the conclusion that

Speaker:

his punishment was not, in

Speaker:

truth unjust, but that it

Speaker:

most assuredly was iniquitous.

Speaker:

Anger may be both foolish and absurd.

Speaker:

One can be irritated wrongfully. One is

Speaker:

exasperated only when there is some show of right on one side

Speaker:

at bottom. Jean Valjean felt

Speaker:

himself exasperated. And besides,

Speaker:

human society had done him nothing but harm.

Speaker:

He had never seen anything of it save that angry face which

Speaker:

it calls justice and which it shows to those whom

Speaker:

it strikes. Men had only touched him to bruise

Speaker:

him. Every contact with them had been a

Speaker:

blow. Never since his infancy, since

Speaker:

the days of his mother, of his sister, had he ever

Speaker:

encountered a friendly word and a kindly glance.

Speaker:

From suffering to suffering, he had gradually arrived at

Speaker:

the conviction that life is a war, and that

Speaker:

in this war, he was the conquered.

Speaker:

He had no other weapon than his hate. He

Speaker:

resolved to whet it in the galleys and to bear it away with him when he

Speaker:

departed. There was it too

Speaker:

long a school for the convicts, kept by

Speaker:

the ignorantan friars, where the most necessary

Speaker:

branches were taught. To those of the unfortunate men who had a mind

Speaker:

for them, he was of the number who had a

Speaker:

mind. He went to school at the age of 40

Speaker:

and learned to read, to write, to

Speaker:

cipher. He felt that to fortify his

Speaker:

intelligence was to fortify his hate.

Speaker:

In certain cases, education and

Speaker:

enlightenment can serve to eke out evil.

Speaker:

This is a sad thing to say. after having judged

Speaker:

society, which had caused his

Speaker:

unhappiness, he judged providence, which

Speaker:

had made society, and he condemned it also.

Speaker:

Thus, during 19 years of torture and

Speaker:

slavery, this soul mounted and at the same time

Speaker:

fell. Light entered it on one

Speaker:

side and darkness on the other. Jean

Speaker:

Valjean had not, as we

Speaker:

have seen, an evil nature. He was still

Speaker:

good when he arrived at the galleys. He there

Speaker:

condemned society and felt that he was becoming

Speaker:

wicked. He there condemned providence and was

Speaker:

conscious that he was becoming impious.

Speaker:

It is difficult not to indulge in meditation at this

Speaker:

point. Does human nature thus

Speaker:

change utterly and from top to bottom?

Speaker:

Can the man, created good by God, be rendered wicked by

Speaker:

man? Can the soul be completely made over by

Speaker:

fate and become evil? Fate,

Speaker:

being evil, can the heart become

Speaker:

misshapen and contract incurable

Speaker:

deformities and infirmities. Under the oppression of

Speaker:

a disproportionate unhappiness. As the vertebral

Speaker:

column beneath too low a vault. Is

Speaker:

there not in every human soul?

Speaker:

Was there not in the soul of Jean Valjean in particular.

Speaker:

A first spark, a divine

Speaker:

element, incorruptible in this world,

Speaker:

immortal in the other, which good can

Speaker:

develop, fan, ignite

Speaker:

and make to glow with splendor. And which evil can never

Speaker:

wholly extinguish grave and, obscure

Speaker:

questions to the last of which every physiologist

Speaker:

would probably have responded. No. And that

Speaker:

without hesitation. Had he beheld at

Speaker:

Toulon. During the hours of repose. Which

Speaker:

were for Jean Valjean hours of reverie,

Speaker:

this gloomy galley slave seated

Speaker:

with folded arms upon the bar of some capstan. With

Speaker:

the end of his chain thrust into his pocket to prevent its

Speaker:

dragging, serious, silent

Speaker:

and thoughtful. A pariah of the laws which

Speaker:

regarded the man with wrath, condemned by

Speaker:

civilization. And regarding heaven with severity.

Speaker:

Certainly, and we make no attempt to dissimulate the

Speaker:

fact. The observing physiologist would

Speaker:

have beheld an irremediable misery.

Speaker:

He would perchance have pitied this sick man

Speaker:

of the laws making, but he would not

Speaker:

have even essayed any treatment.

Speaker:

>> Brie Carlisle: He would have turned aside his gaze.

Speaker:

>> Brie Carlisle: From the caverns of which he would have caught a glimpse within this

Speaker:

soul. And like Dante at the portals of hell,

Speaker:

he would have effaced from this existence. The word which the finger of

Speaker:

God. Has nevertheless inscribed

Speaker:

upon the brow of every man. Hope,

Speaker:

was this state of his soul. Which

Speaker:

we have attempted to analyze. As perfectly

Speaker:

clear to Jean Valjean as we have tried to render it for those

Speaker:

who read us. Did Jean Valjean

Speaker:

distinctly perceive after their formation.

Speaker:

And had he seen distinctly during the process of their

Speaker:

formation. All the elements of which his moral

Speaker:

misery was composed? Had this

Speaker:

rough and unlettered man gathered a perfectly clear

Speaker:

perception. Of the succession of ideas. Through which

Speaker:

he had by degrees mounted. And descended. To

Speaker:

the lugubrious aspects. Which had for

Speaker:

so many years formed the inner horizon of his

Speaker:

spirit? Was he conscious of all that passed

Speaker:

within him. And of all that was working there?

Speaker:

That is something which we do not presume to

Speaker:

state. It is something which we do not even

Speaker:

believe. There was too much ignorance in

Speaker:

Jean Valjean, even after his misfortune,

Speaker:

to prevent much vagueness from still lingering there.

Speaker:

At times, he did not rightly know himself what

Speaker:

he felt. Jean Valjean was in the

Speaker:

shadows he suffered, in the

Speaker:

shadows he hated, in the shadows

Speaker:

one might have said that he hated in advance of

Speaker:

himself. He dwelt habitually

Speaker:

in the shadow, feeling his way like a blind man and a

Speaker:

dreamer. Only at intervals

Speaker:

there suddenly came to him from without and from

Speaker:

within, an access of wrath,

Speaker:

a surcharge of suffering, a livid and

Speaker:

rapid flash which illuminated his whole soul

Speaker:

and caused to appear abruptly all around him, in

Speaker:

front, behind, amid the gleams of a frightful

Speaker:

night, the hideous precipices and the somber

Speaker:

perspective of his destiny. The

Speaker:

flash passed. The night closed in

Speaker:

again. And where was he?

Speaker:

He no longer knew the

Speaker:

peculiarity of pains of this nature in

Speaker:

which that which is pitiless, that is to

Speaker:

say, that which is brutalizing, predominates,

Speaker:

is to transform a man little by little, by a sort

Speaker:

of stupid transfiguration into a wild

Speaker:

beast, sometimes into a ferocious

Speaker:

beast. Jean Valjean's successive

Speaker:

and obstinate attempts at escape would alone suffice to prove

Speaker:

the strange working of the law upon the human soul.

Speaker:

Jean Valjean would have renewed these attempts,

Speaker:

utterly useless and foolish as they were, as often

Speaker:

as the opportunity had presented itself, without

Speaker:

reflecting for an instant on the result,

Speaker:

nor on the experiences which he had already gone through,

Speaker:

he escaped impetuously, like the wolf who finds

Speaker:

his cage open. Instinct said to him,

Speaker:

flee. Reason would have said,

Speaker:

remain. But in the presence of so violent a

Speaker:

temptation, reason vanished. Nothing

Speaker:

remained but instinct. The beast

Speaker:

alone acted. When he was

Speaker:

recaptured, the fresh severities inflicted on him only

Speaker:

served to render him still more wild.

Speaker:

One detail which we must not omit is that he

Speaker:

possessed a physical strength which was not approached by a single one

Speaker:

of the denizens of the galleys. At

Speaker:

work at, paying out a cable or winding up a

Speaker:

capstan, Jean Valjean was worth four

Speaker:

men. He sometimes lifted and sustained

Speaker:

enormous weights on his back, and when the occasion

Speaker:

demanded it, he replaced that implement which is called a jack

Speaker:

screw and was formerly called Agiel

Speaker:

pride. Whence, we may remark in

Speaker:

passing, is derived from the name of the room, Montegrel,

Speaker:

near the Halles fish market in Paris.

Speaker:

His comrades had nicknamed him Jean the

Speaker:

jackscrew. Once, when they

Speaker:

were repairing the balcony of the town hall at Toulon,

Speaker:

one of those admirable caryatids of

Speaker:

Puget which support the balcony became

Speaker:

loosened and was on the point of falling.

Speaker:

Jean Valjean, who was present, supported the

Speaker:

caryatid with his shoulder and gave the workmen

Speaker:

time to arrive. His suppleness even

Speaker:

exceeded his strength. Certain convicts who were

Speaker:

forever dreaming of escape ended by making a

Speaker:

veritable science of force and skill combined.

Speaker:

It is the science of muscles. An entire

Speaker:

system of mysterious statics is daily practiced by

Speaker:

prisoners, men who are forever envious of the

Speaker:

flies and birds. To climb a vertical

Speaker:

surface and to find points of support where hardly

Speaker:

a projection was visible, was play to Jean

Speaker:

Valjean. An angle of the wall being

Speaker:

given with the tension of his back and legs,

Speaker:

with his elbows and his heels fitted into the unevenness of the

Speaker:

stone, he raised himself, as if by magic,

Speaker:

to the third story. He sometimes

Speaker:

mounted thus even to the roof of the galley prison.

Speaker:

He spoke but little. He laughed

Speaker:

not at all. An excessive emotion was

Speaker:

required to wring from him once or twice a

Speaker:

year. That lugubrious laugh of the convict, which is

Speaker:

like the echo of the laugh of a demon. To all

Speaker:

appearance, he seemed to be occupied in the constant

Speaker:

contemplation of something terrible. He

Speaker:

was absorbed, in fact,

Speaker:

athwart the unhealthy perceptions of an incomplete

Speaker:

nature and a crushed intelligence. He was

Speaker:

confusedly conscious that some monstrous thing was

Speaker:

resting on him in that obscure and waned

Speaker:

shadow within which he crawled. Each time that he

Speaker:

turned his neck and essayed to raise his glance,

Speaker:

he perceived with terror mingled with

Speaker:

rage, a sort of frightful accumulation of things

Speaker:

collecting and mounting above him beyond the

Speaker:

range of his vision. Laws,

Speaker:

prejudices, men and deeds

Speaker:

whose outlines escaped him, whose mass

Speaker:

terrified him, and which was nothing else than that

Speaker:

prodigious pyramid which we call civilization.

Speaker:

He distinguished here and there in that

Speaker:

swarming and formless mass now near

Speaker:

him, now afar off and on inaccessible

Speaker:

table lands, some groups, some

Speaker:

detail vividly illuminated.

Speaker:

Here, the galley sergeant and his cudgel,

Speaker:

there the gendarme in his sword yonder,

Speaker:

the mitred archbishop away at the top, like a

Speaker:

sort of sun, the emperor crowned and

Speaker:

dazzling. It seemed to him that

Speaker:

these distant splendors, far from dissipating

Speaker:

his knight, rendered it more funereal and more

Speaker:

black. All this

Speaker:

laws, prejudices, deeds,

Speaker:

men, things went and came above him over

Speaker:

his head, in accordance with the complicated and

Speaker:

mysterious movement which God imparts to civilization,

Speaker:

walking over him and crushing him with, I know

Speaker:

not what, peacefulness in its cruelty

Speaker:

and inexorability in its indifference.

Speaker:

Souls which have fallen to the bottom of all possible

Speaker:

misfortune, unhappy men, lost in

Speaker:

the lowest of those limbos at, which no one any longer

Speaker:

looks, who approved of the law, feel the

Speaker:

whole weight of this human society so

Speaker:

formidable for him who is without, so frightful

Speaker:

for him who is beneath, resting upon their heads.

Speaker:

In this situation, Jean Valjean

Speaker:

meditated and what could be the

Speaker:

nature of his meditation? If the grain of

Speaker:

millet beneath the millstone had thoughts, it would doubtless think

Speaker:

that same thing which Jean Valjean thought.

Speaker:

All these things, realities full

Speaker:

of specters, phantasmagories full of

Speaker:

realities, had eventually created for him a

Speaker:

sort of interior state which is almost

Speaker:

indescribable at times.

Speaker:

Amid, his convict toil, he paused.

Speaker:

He fell to thinking. His

Speaker:

reason, one and the same time riper and more

Speaker:

troubled than of yore, rose in

Speaker:

revolt. Everything which had happened to

Speaker:

him seemed to him absurd. Everything that

Speaker:

surrounded him seemed to him impossible.

Speaker:

He said to himself, it is a dream.

Speaker:

He gazed at the galley sergeant standing a few paces from

Speaker:

him. The galley sergeant seemed a phantom to

Speaker:

him. All of a sudden, the phantom dealt him

Speaker:

a blow with his cudgel. Visible nature

Speaker:

hardly existed for him. It would almost

Speaker:

be true to say that there existed for Jean Valjean neither

Speaker:

son, nor fine summer days,

Speaker:

nor radiant sky, nor fresh April

Speaker:

dawns. I know not what vent hole daylight

Speaker:

habitually illumined his soul. To

Speaker:

sum up, in conclusion, that

Speaker:

which can be summed up and translated into positive

Speaker:

results in all that we have just pointed out,

Speaker:

we will confine ourselves to the statement that in the course

Speaker:

of 19 years, Jean

Speaker:

Valjean, the inoffensive tree pruner of

Speaker:

faveroli, the formidable convict of Toulon,

Speaker:

had become capable, thanks to the manner in which

Speaker:

the galleys had molded him, of two sorts of

Speaker:

evil action. Firstly, of evil

Speaker:

action which was rapid, unpremeditated,

Speaker:

dashing, entirely instinctive in the nature of

Speaker:

reprisals for the evil which he had undergone.

Speaker:

Secondly, of evil action which was serious, grave,

Speaker:

consciously argued out and premeditated with

Speaker:

the false ideas which such a misfortune can

Speaker:

furnish. His deliberate deeds pass through

Speaker:

three successive phases which natures of a

Speaker:

certain stamp can alone traverse.

Speaker:

Reasoning will

Speaker:

perseverance he had for moving

Speaker:

causes his habitual wrath, bitterness of

Speaker:

soul, a profound sense of indignity is

Speaker:

suffered the reaction even against the

Speaker:

good, the innocent and the just, if there are

Speaker:

any such. The point of departure like

Speaker:

the point of arrival. For all his thoughts was

Speaker:

hatred of human law. That

Speaker:

hatred which, if it be not arrested in its

Speaker:

development by some providential incident,

Speaker:

becomes within a given time the

Speaker:

hatred of society, then the hatred of

Speaker:

the human race, then the hatred of

Speaker:

creation, and which manifests itself

Speaker:

by a vague, incessant and brutal desire to

Speaker:

do harm to some living being, no

Speaker:

matter whom it will be perceived

Speaker:

that it was not without reason that Jean

Speaker:

Valjean's passport described him as a very dangerous

Speaker:

man. From year to year, the

Speaker:

soul had dried away slowly, but with

Speaker:

fatal sureness. When the heart is dry, the eye is

Speaker:

dry. On his departure from the galleys,

Speaker:

it had been 19 years since he had shed a

Speaker:

tear.

Speaker:

Thank you for joining bite at a time books today while we

Speaker:

read a bite of one of your favorite classics.

Speaker:

Again, my name is Brie Carlisle and I

Speaker:

hope you come back tomorrow. for the next bite of

Speaker:

Le.

Speaker:

>> Brie Carlisle: Miserable, dont forget to

Speaker:

sign up for our

Speaker:

newsletter@biteaditimebooks.com and check

Speaker:

out the shop. You can check out the show notes or

Speaker:

our website, byteaditimebooks.com, for

Speaker:

the rest of the links for our show. wed love to hear from you on

Speaker:

social media as well.

Speaker:

>> Speaker A: Take a look and let's

Speaker:

see what we can find.

Speaker:

Take it chapter by chapter. One.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube