How to approach due diligence on a new operator as a limited partner? How should investors decide if they should invest in a fund or not? How should you fundraise for deals that have not been determined what they are yet? When to say no to a potential investor? Dr. Joseph Ryan Smolarz, founder of STOR, shares his insights.

Read the entire interview here: http://tinyurl.com/yph2892p

What are some of the main topics that you want to pass to passive investors and how should they do due diligence?

The basis of the whole interaction is trust, you're trying to build rapport with your investors from a sponsor's point of view. From an investor's point of view, you want to make sure that you're a good fit. You have ways of thinking about things and your risk tolerance needs to fit into the asset class and the investment strategy that you're trying to do because if you're in a very aggressive fund, and you have a low-risk tolerance, regardless of what happens, you're not going to be happy. Those are the questions that I would start with.

When you're starting the due diligence as a sponsor, the number one goal is to make sure you're not in a Ponzi scheme or some sort of fraudulent group. There's a lot of good questions to ask to sort of drill down on that and if you're not comfortable at the beginning, you're probably not going to be comfortable at the middle or the end, as well.

During an up market, how would you recommend doctors doing their best to find out if a sponsor is not legitimate?

Having made several pretty bad mistakes as a limited partner, this is a topic that's near and dear to my heart. When I approach a deal as a limited partner, what I'm trying to do is understand that sponsor in such a way that we can build a 30, 40-year relationship. It's not about the first deal in its entirety, because I'm willing to put in the time, effort, and cost to get to a comfortable place knowing that when these guys or girls have a deal, and they send it to me, that I'm never going to have to go through this first step of due diligence again. I'm comfortable that they're not trying to push one past me, or whatever the case may be. And that's a gigantic step. I would personally say, and I know this is going to be shocking to your audience, but a lot of times, what I'll do is, I will hire a PI to go through and make sure that some of their previous deals have not been fraudulent.

If I had a fund, and I knew that the economy was about to take a turn, for example, in 2024, we all know that it'll be even better for finding deals. However, there is a lot of fear that normal human beings think that that specific time will never end and it'll be doom and gloom for a very long time so they end up not putting the money. From a fund perspective, I would personally prefer to have that cash available right now in case people get cold feet, how would one go about that, in your experience?

There are lots of sponsors out there that will do that, they'll get the capital, and hold on to it. It does add liability to to the fund. If you're going to do that, you would probably want to know how much E&O insurance they have, errors and omissions, and all the things to safeguard. Is there the ability for one person to be able to extract all of the cash and run, or is there a safety mechanism where it takes two people to sign off on it? There are lots of checks and balances, and systems out there that can be put in place for a reasonable cost if the sponsor hasn't thought about that, and what happens in those scenarios, and they very well should. But it's just personal preference.

Dr. Joseph Ryan Smolarz

www.storpartners.com

The Medicine & Money Show