"Surprise, surprise, the king is back"

But was he?

The Armchair Judges return to critique the second bout between two of the UFC's kings of controversy, when Conor McGregor avenged his shock second round defeat at the hands of Nate Diaz.

Both fighters predicted that they would dominate in a rematch that proved to have far reaching consequences for both fighters, both in MMA and beyond. But did the bout really indicate a greater potential for either fighter? Was it the classic fight that many of us remembered it to be?

And most importantly, did the official judges get it right?

If you're enjoying the show, please share it with a friend, or you can help support us by dropping by our youtube channel and leaving a like on one of our clips. You can also reach out to us with suggestions for bouts that we should cover via comments on our youtube, or by email at Armchairjudges@yahoo.com