JudgeMental Podcast – Episode 96 Derby Week
In this episode, Christine and Trey dive deep into one of the most pressing issues facing the judiciary today: judges on social media. What happens when a judge in a black robe posts videos laced with religious teachings? Is it protected free speech — or a troubling conflict of interest? The hosts unpack a viral video of a Texas judge weaving scripture into a courtroom-adjacent social media post, debate where the line should be drawn, and agree that the robe changes everything.
The conversation expands into a broader reckoning with judicial transparency — or the lack of it. Christine and Hugh make the case for C-SPAN-style coverage of courts, particularly family courts, arguing that the branch of government most people interact with is somehow the least visible. They also discuss the alarming state of family court: confidential dockets, overworked court-appointed attorneys, and decisions about children's lives made in hallways.
Christine drops a bold prediction: that Kentucky's legislature will move to close all family court proceedings at the next session — and she's willing to bet on it.
Topics covered:
Judge David (Texas) and the viral black robe/scripture video
Religion in judicial campaigning vs. religion on the bench
Why wearing the robe on social media is uniquely problematic
The case for C-SPAN in courtrooms
How family court confidentiality shields dysfunction
Court-appointed attorneys and the "just sign this" problem
The erosion of judicial independence at the federal and state level
Immigration judges and the stacking of the courts
The impeachment of judges as a political tool
Christine's prediction: family courts go fully confidential next session
Resources & Community:
Rate any judge for free and join the anonymous judicial review community: judge-y.com
Follow us on social: @Judgingthejudges
Download the Judge-y app — rate judges, read reviews, and connect with others navigating the court system. The community is anonymous and affordable. judge-y.com
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Engaging with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the hosts, guests, or their firms. The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are solely those of the individuals involved and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any law firm, company, or organization. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the information presented. Any reliance on the information in this podcast is at your own risk. Laws are constantly changing, and every situation is unique. You should always seek the advice of a qualified attorney for your specific legal concerns.
