In this episode of Dumbify, I unpack a painful truth I learned too late: the things that make you feel like the odd kid in homeroom are often the very traits that make you unforgettable. From my own New York Times “corporate cosplay” disaster to Julia Child refusing to sand down her quirks for a book deal, we explore how leaning into your weird can turn you from forgettable to magnetic.

Then we go deeper with Temple Grandin, whose autism gave her a sensory perspective that revolutionized livestock handling worldwide. Backed by science on cognitive diversity and outsider thinking, this episode is a love letter to your quirks, your odd angles, your “essential what-ness.” If you’ve ever been told to tone it down, make it more normal, or fit the mold, this is your permission slip to do the opposite—and get remembered for it.

Sign up for the Dumbify newsletter: https://www.david-carson.com/

Dumbify celebrates ideas so weird, wrong, or wildly impractical… they just might be brilliant. Hosted by David Carson, a serial entrepreneur behind multiple hundred-million-dollar companies and the go-to secret weapon for companies looking to unlock new markets through unconventional thinking. Dumbify dives into the messy, counter-intuitive side of creativity — the “dumb” ideas that built empires, broke rules, and ended up changing everything.

So this is awkward, but stick with me, because I'm about to confess to a photograph that still makes my self-esteem fake its own death. Flashback to 2005, the frosted tips era of Web 2.0, and my co-founder and I are about to land on the front page of the New York Times business section. It's a big deal. There's a real photographer and everything. I should have been giddy. Instead, at 6:00 in the morning, I was having a full-blown identity meltdown in my closet. You see, I was a human Venn diagram no one knew how to label, least of all me. I was a designer who codes, a writer who corrals teams, an entrepreneur in denial, essentially.

But back then, full-stack sounded more like an IHOP order, and product person meant you worked at Bed Bath & Beyond.

I was a lot of weird things grafted together with coffee and imposter syndrome. Early out of college, I would go to these networking events, and they were brutal. Someone would eventually ask, "So, what do you do?" And I'd deliver a TED Talk nobody wanted. "Well, I design, but I also code, and sometimes I write. And occasionally, I herd humans into building the stuff I just described." And I could just see their eyes had just evacuated the premises, and they would quickly start chatting up someone else who was easier to parse and understand. I was the professional platypus. Too many spare parts for one tidy zoological chart. But eventually I figured out, I could just build things and show them rather than try to explain what I do. So when the Times' photographer arrived, did I lean into the platypus chic? Nope. I panicked. Threw on a suit that made me look like a 12-year-old trick-or-treating as a Fortune 500 CEO. Flattened my hair into a crime scene cover-up. Practiced the executive stance, part power pose, part intestinal cramp. The voice in my head kept chanting, "This is what success looks like, right?" When the photo hit newsprint, I couldn't look. Still can't. The guy in that picture isn't me. He's my best attempt at corporate cosplay. Meanwhile, I'd scroll past the oddballs I admired, people who swaggered around in unapologetic weird, and think, "Man, must be nice." Then my own spotlight shows up, and I morph into Banker Ken. Years later, it finally clicked. The thing that made me feel like the odd kid in homeroom was exactly the thing that made my work interesting. Our company didn't take off because we played by the rules. It was because we couldn't figure out what the rules even were. So here's the postcard from the edge. The trait that makes you feel like an outsider might be your secret invoice generator. Hi, I'm David Carson, and today, I'll be your tour guide through the glorious museum of misfits, and prove that the quirks you keep trying to Photoshop out are the same flourishes that tattoo you onto other people's brains. Welcome to Dumbify, the number one podcast for getting smarter by thinking dumber.

Dumbify, let your neurons dance. Put your brain in backwards pants. Genus hides in daft disguise. Brilliance wears those googly eyes. So honk your nose and chase that spark. Dumb is just smart in the dark. Dumbify, yelling like a goose. It's thinking wrong on purpose with juice.

I've nursed a decades-long crush on Julia Child that borders on clinically silly. Imagine a 6-foot-2 Valkyrie with a tipsy warble, brandishing a wooden spoon like a baton, and whipping beef bourguignon into a full-blown symphony.

You just have to plunge in. Supposing it is a flop.

I think that's part of the appeal.

It's usually edible. It's fun, and I think everyone should be encouraged to use it as a creative outlet. You must be a fearless cook.

How could anyone not swoon? And on top of all that, she managed to grab all those fussy French techniques and spin them into rowdy kitchen field trips.

Let me tell you about the moment that could have changed everything for Julia Child. In the late 1950s, Julia and her collaborators had spent years writing what would become Mastering the Art of French Cooking.They finally got a contract with Houghton Mifflin, a prestigious publisher. This was their big break, their chance to make it in the cookbook world. Then the editor called with notes. He told Julia, "Americans don't want an encyclopedia. They want to cook something quick with a mix. Make it simpler," he said. "Make it more conventional. Make it something that won't intimidate the American housewife." This was Julia's New York Times moment. This was her chance to sand down her rough edges, to give the experts what they expected, to transform herself into what the industry thought would sell. And here's what Julia Child did. She said, "No."

[gasps]

She and her collaborators refused to make the requested changes. They walked away from the deal. Houghton Mifflin abandoned the project, writing that the book as it stood would be too formidable to the American housewife. Now, here's what makes this even more remarkable. Julia Child was not some naturally confident person who never doubted herself. In her own memoir, she wrote this brutally honest self-assessment. "Upon reflection, I decided I had three main weaknesses. I was confused. I had a lack of confidence, which caused me to back down from forcefully stated positions. And I was overly emotional. I was 37 years old and still discovering who I was." Sound familiar? She had a tendency to back down from forcefully stated positions. She struggled with confidence. She was still figuring out who she was. But somehow, when publishers told her to be more conventional, when the industry told her to fit their mold, she found the strength to say no. What did she know that I didn't? But Julia had developed what she called a "what the hell" attitude. She said, "The only real stumbling block is fear of failure. In cooking, you've got to have a what the hell attitude." She literally made a philosophy out of choosing authenticity over safety. When her TV show, The French Chef finally launched, she could have insisted on multiple takes, careful editing, polished presentations. Instead, she chose to let her mistakes show on air. The show was completely unedited, causing her blunders to appear in the final version. This wasn't accidental. It was a deliberate choice to prioritize authenticity over perfection. She developed a systematic approach to being herself. "I don't believe in twisting yourself into knots of excuses and explanations," she said. "No matter what happens in the kitchen, never apologize." She turned vulnerability into a professional strategy. When she famously dropped that turkey on live television, she just picked it up and kept going, saying, "When you're alone in the kitchen, who's going to see?" She was showing America that imperfection was not only acceptable, it was human. While I was standing in my closet at 6:00 AM trying to figure out how to look like what I thought a successful CEO should look like, Julia Child had already figured out the secret. The fear of not fitting in is more dangerous than the risk of being too much yourself. The cookbook that Houghton Mifflin rejected as too formidable, it became a bestseller when Knopf published it unchanged. The TV show where she refused to hide her mistakes, it won her a Peabody Award and an Emmy. The tall, awkward, loudly enthusiastic approach that made food snobs cringe, it made her one of the most beloved figures in American culture. By the time I was having my identity crisis in 2005, Julia Child had already spent 40 years proving that authenticity isn't just memorable, it's profitable. She'd shown that the things that make you feel like an outsider are exactly the things that make you irreplaceable. But I didn't know her story then. I didn't know about the publisher she'd walked away from, or the confidence issues she'd overcome, or the systematic way she'd learned to choose authenticity over conformity. All I knew was that I was about to be in the New York Times, and I thought I needed to look like someone I wasn't. Julia Child knew something I didn't, that the scariest thing about authenticity isn't that people might reject you. It's that they might not. And if you're not really yourself when they accept you, then what exactly have you won? The thing that made Julia Child weird, her refusal to be anything other than exactly who she was is exactly what made her unforgettable. What if I had known her secret that morning in 2005? What if instead of trying to look like a CEO, I had just shown up as the weird boundary crossing, category defying guy who'd built something the Times wanted to write about? I guess we'll never know, but maybe that's the point. It's never too late to start making Julia's choice. But what happens when your weirdness isn't just about personality traits you could choose to hide or amplify? What happens when the thing that makes you different is literally how your brain processes the world, and that different processing gives you access to insights that no one else can see?

Let me tell you about Temple Grandin, whose story takes us beyond memorability and into something much more important, how being neurologically different can give you a perspective that changes entire industries. In 1973, Temple Grandin was a 26-year-old graduate student with autism at Arizona State University, working on her master's degree in animal science. This was decades before autism was widely understood. Most people with autism were still institutionalized.Temple's own mother had been told to put her away when she was a child. She couldn't make eye contact, physical touch was overwhelming, and she communicated in ways that seemed bizarre to everyone around her. But Temple had managed to make it to graduate school, studying animal behavior. The agricultural world of the early 1970s had no patience for a young woman with autism asking strange questions about cow psychology. [cow moos] When she tried to visit feed lots and slaughterhouses to observe cattle, managers would take one look at her awkward mannerisms and refuse her entry. "We don't need some weird college girl telling us about our animals," they'd say. The academic world wasn't much better. Her professors dismissed her visual thinking as simplistic. When she tried to explain that she could see in her mind exactly how scared cattle moved through handling facilities, they suggested she focus on more serious quantitative research.

You got to stop thinking weird. Start thinking right. You got to stop this nonsense or we're going to do something that will seem odd in the future, but totally acceptable right now. 'Cause we think you are too goofy to have any formidable breakthroughs. 'Cause you're weird.

Temple was stuck. Her brain worked differently than everyone else's, and that difference seemed to close every door. She thought in pictures instead of words. Loud noises and sudden movements that others barely noticed would send her into sensory overload. She had built herself a squeeze machine, a contraption that applied deep pressure to calm her nervous system just to function day-to-day. But then something remarkable happened. Temple realized that the same sensory sensitivity that made human environments unbearable for her might actually help her understand how animals experienced the world. She started sneaking into cattle facilities at dawn before workers arrived. She would crawl through the metal chutes on her hands and knees experiencing what cattle saw and felt. She noticed that cattle would balk at shadows that looked like holes in the ground. They'd panic at reflections from puddles or metal surfaces. Chain link fences created confusing visual patterns that spooked them. The straight, narrow chutes that the industry had always used felt like traps to animals who naturally moved in curves. When Temple tried to share these observations, livestock managers laughed at her. The idea that cattle had complex emotional and sensory experiences was ridiculous to them.

Cattle were livestock. You moved them efficiently from point A to point B, period. But Temple had seen something no neurotypical researcher could see. Her autism gave her a form of sensory processing that was remarkably similar to how prey animals like cattle experienced the world. The overwhelming stimuli that made her different were the same things that terrorized cattle in poorly designed facilities. She started designing curved chutes with solid walls, carefully controlled lighting, and minimal visual distractions. When she finally convinced a few facilities to test her designs, the results were undeniable. Cattle moved calmly through her systems. Stress-related injuries dropped dramatically. Meat quality improved because unstressed animals produced better beef. The industry couldn't ignore the data. Temple's designs began spreading across ranches and slaughterhouses throughout the American West. Her autism had given her insights that revolutionized livestock handling. Today, Temple Grandin's designs are used in almost half the cattle facilities in North America. She's been featured on Time Magazine's list of the World's Most Influential People, and has fundamentally changed how we think about both autism and animal welfare. Temple's different neural wiring revealed truths about animal behavior that had been invisible to everyone else. Her weirdness became the key to seeing what no one else could see.

So we've moved from weird makes you memorable to different thinking changes everything. But what does the science actually tell us about why outsider perspectives like Temple Grandin's are so powerful at driving breakthrough innovation? It turns out there's a whole field of research that explains why the people who think differently aren't just interesting, they're essential for human progress. Dr. Scott Page at the University of Michigan has spent decades studying what he calls cognitive diversity. Teams that include people with fundamentally different ways of processing information. His research consistently shows that cognitively diverse teams outperform homogeneous teams of experts on complex problems. But here's the really fascinating part. It's not just that diverse teams are better at brainstorming or being creative. They're better at solving actual technical problems that have right and wrong answers. When Page studied patent data and breakthrough innovations, he found that the most revolutionary discoveries disproportionately came from people working at the boundaries between disciplines, or from complete outsiders to the field. This connects directly to Temple Grandin's story. She wasn't just a quirky researcher who happened to think differently. She was someone whose neurological wiring allowed her to process sensory information in ways that gave her access to insights that were literally invisible to neurotypical researchers. Dr. Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, who won the Nobel Prize for their work on cognitive biases, documented something they called expert blind spots.When people become deeply expert in a field, they develop systematic ways of not seeing certain problems or solutions. They become trapped by their expertise. But here's where it gets really interesting for our purposes. Dr. Karim Lakhani, at Harvard Business School, studied over 200,000 innovation challenges and found that the problems most likely to be solved were tackled by people whose expertise was adjacent to, but not central to, the field. The outsiders weren't succeeding despite their lack of formal training, they were succeeding because of it. Neuroscientist, Dr. Nancy Andreasen, has studied the brains of highly creative people and found something remarkable. They show unusual patterns of connectivity between brain regions that don't normally talk to each other. In other words, the most innovative thinkers literally have weird brains that make connections others can't see. This explains why breakthrough innovations so often come from people who seem wrong for their fields. Temple Grandin's autism allowed her to process sensory information in ways that revealed animal behavior patterns invisible to conventional researchers. Her different neural wiring wasn't just a personal trait, it was a cognitive tool that unlocked insights no one else could access. The research suggests that when we try to make our thinking more normal or professional, we might be systematically cutting ourselves off from our most valuable insights. The very cognitive differences that make us feel like outsiders might be exactly what the world needs to solve its most complex problems. So the next time someone tells you your way of thinking is too different or not how we do things here, remember, they might be telling you that you have access to solutions they can't see. And that's not a bug in your thinking, it's a feature that could change an awful lot.

Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb word of the day. Dumb word of the day. It's a word, it's dumb. Use responsibly.

All right, it's time for my favorite part of the show. It's time for Dumb Word of the Day. Because apparently I've decided that the best use of my limited time on this planet is to get genuinely excited about words that sound like they were invented by someone having a very specific type of fever dream. Today's dumb word is “quiddity”. Spelled Q-U-I-D-D-I-T-Y. Quiddity. This delicious little word comes from Medieval Latin quidditas, meaning what-ness, as in the essential what that makes something what it is. Your quiddity is your fundamental essence, the irreducible core of traits that makes you uniquely, unmistakably you, even when everything else gets stripped away.

Why is this perfect for today's episode? Because your quiddity is exactly what corporate America wants to sand off. They want to smooth away your essential what-ness until you're just a generic who-ness. Interchangeable, predictable, forgettable. But here's what's beautiful about this word. It sounds like something a medieval alchemist would write in their secret journal right next to formulas for turning lead into gold. And in a way, that's exactly what it is. The magical formula that turns an ordinary person into something memorable. Let's try using it in a sentence. After years of corporate training designed to eliminate her essential quiddity, Jennifer realized she'd become so professionally generic that even her business cards looked embarrassed. The goal isn't to hide your quiddity, it's to lean into it, embrace your what-ness. Which is what I think my new DJ name will be. Straight from the What-ness Protection Program, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome DJ What-ness.

That was weird. Moving on.

So, here's your dumbify challenge for this week, and I'm calling it The Idiosyncrasy Audit, which sounds way more sophisticated than Embrace Your Weirdness Experiment. This is about identifying and deliberately amplifying the parts of yourself that you've been trained to hide, minimize, or apologize for. Step one. Make a list of three things about yourself that you consider slightly embarrassing or unprofessional. Maybe you collect something unusual, have strong opinions about font choices, make sound effects when you're thinking, or have an encyclopedic knowledge of reality TV drama. Write down the stuff you edit out in professional settings. Step two. Pick one of these traits and find a way to work it into a professional conversation this week. Not aggressively. You're not trying to be inappropriate, but if someone asks about your weekend, instead of saying, "It was fine," try, "I spent Saturday reorganizing my vintage spoon collection by decade, and I discovered some fascinating patterns in handle design evolution." Notice what happens. Do people seem more engaged? Do they remember you better? Do they start sharing their own weird interests? Step three. Pay attention to other peoples' idiosyncrasies instead of ignoring them. When someone mentions an unusual hobby or shows a quirky personality trait, lean into it instead of politely changing the subject. Ask follow-up questions. Show genuine curiosity about the things that make them distinctive. Bonus points. If someone tells you you're being weird and you get to respond with, "Thank you. I've been working on my idiosyncratic professional presence," you win the entire challenge. The goal isn't to become a circus performer in a boardroom. It's to stop shrinking the parts of yourself that make you memorable. Because in a world where everyone's trying to sound like everyone else, the person willing to be authentically strange is the one people remember, trust, and wanna work with. Remember, your weird isn't a bug, it's a feature, and it might just be the most valuable career asset you've been hiding. And that's our show. Thank you for getting beautifully weird with me today. If this episode made you wanna stop apologizing for your weirdness and start celebrating it, share it with someone who's been polishing their personality until it's professionally invisible. If you want more scientifically backed permission to be authentically strange, subscribe to the Dumbify Newsletter at david-carson.com. Until next time, stay curious, stay distinctive, and remember, the things that make you weird are exactly the things that make you unforgettable. This is David Carson signing off from the beautiful chaos of authentic weirdness, where different isn't just better, it's remembered.