What if getting something wrong before you learn it could actually help you remember it better later?

It sounds backward, but research in the science of learning reveals an important gap between how learning feels and what actually produces durable knowledge.

In this episode of High School Wasn’t Built for Every Kid: The College OnRamps Podcast, Maggie Hagen and I explore the concept of desirable difficulties: learning conditions that may make performance feel harder in the moment while strengthening learning over time.

We start with a surprising finding from research on pretesting. In certain studies, learners who attempted questions before studying, even when their initial answers were wrong, learned more from the material that followed than learners who simply received additional study time.

Why?

We explore unsuccessful retrieval, the critical role of corrective information, and the difference between short-term performance and long-term learning.

We also look at a classic experiment involving children practicing a beanbag-throwing task. Surprisingly, students who practiced at varied distances later performed better at the target distance than students who had practiced only at that exact distance.

Then we tackle a familiar problem for students: rereading notes, highlighting chapters, and cramming can create a powerful feeling of familiarity. But feeling familiar with information is not necessarily the same as being able to retrieve and use it later.

Finally, we explain how these ideas influence the design of College OnRamps, including adaptive learning, active practice, feedback, mentorship, and mastery-based progression.

The takeaway is not that struggling is always good.

Difficulty has to serve learning.

But when a student says, “This feels hard,” that feeling alone does not mean something is going wrong.

Sometimes productive struggle is exactly where deeper learning begins.

🔗 Links and Resources:

Learn more about College Onramps