Artwork for podcast The High Court Report
Opinion Summary: Bouarfa v. Mayorkas | Date Decided: 12/10/24 | Case No. 23-583
Episode 10710th December 2024 • The High Court Report • SCOTUS Oral Arguments
00:00:00 00:07:19

Share Episode

Shownotes

Case Info: Bouarfa v. Mayorkas | Date Decided: 12/10/24 | Case No. 23-583

Link to Docket: Here.

Question Presented: Whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.

Holding: Revocation of an approved visa petition under § 1155 based on a sham-marriage determination by the Secretary is the kind of discretion­ary decision that falls within the purview of § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), which strips federal courts of jurisdiction to review certain actions “in the discretion of” the agency.

Result: Affirmed.

Voting Breakdown: Justice Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. No justice filed a concurring or dissenting opinion.

Link to Opinion: Here.

Oral Advocates:

  • For petitioner: Samir Deger-Sen, New York, N. Y.
  • For respondents: Colleen R. Sinzdak, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.

Website Link to Oral Argument: Here.

Apple Podcast Link to Oral Argument: Here.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube