Artwork for podcast The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
Episode 417 - Be Alert or Be Manipulated
12th February 2024 • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
00:00:00 01:10:28

Share Episode

Shownotes

Topics:

(04:18) Steven Miles Laughs At Violence?

(19:07) Gaza Update

(20:21) UNRWA Aid

(23:36) What Propaganda? ... Exactly

(43:26) Biden Sliden

(50:13) Disconnect

(56:59) Sub Solution - Steal One

(58:26) Coed Vs Same Sex Education

Chapters, images & show notes powered by vizzy.fm.

To financially support the Podcast you can make:

We Livestream every Monday night at 7:30 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.

We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au



Transcripts

Speaker:

Suburban Eastern Australia, an environment that has, over time,

Speaker:

evolved some extraordinarily unique groups of homosapiens.

Speaker:

But today, we observe a small tribe akin to a group of meerkats that

Speaker:

gather together atop a small mound to watch, question, and discuss the

Speaker:

current events of their city, their country, and their world at large.

Speaker:

Let's listen keenly and observe this group fondly known as the

Speaker:

Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove.

Speaker:

Hello and welcome dear listener, just two meerkats for you tonight

Speaker:

on this episode number 417.

Speaker:

We're going to talk about news and politics and sex and religion.

Speaker:

I'm Trevor the Iron Fist, with me UK correspondent.

Speaker:

Now ensconced back in Peter Dutton's electorate, Joe the Tech Guy.

Speaker:

Joe, well how are you Joe?

Speaker:

Evening all, I'm surviving, slowly getting back into the Australian time zone.

Speaker:

There we go, that's Joe.

Speaker:

So, Joe got notes from me extremely late today, so he hasn't had a

Speaker:

chance to read much of it, because I didn't have internet on the weekend

Speaker:

and a whole range of reasons.

Speaker:

Anyway, Joe will work his way through it.

Speaker:

Um, cut him some slack if he doesn't see him across it entirely,

Speaker:

but I'm sure you won't notice.

Speaker:

If you're in the chat room, say hello.

Speaker:

John's there, Watley's there.

Speaker:

Thanks for saying hello on this Monday evening at our new time of 8 o'clock.

Speaker:

And, um, yeah, what are we going to talk about?

Speaker:

Well, we're going to kick off with

Speaker:

Manipulation by the media of the thinking of the public, in a nutshell.

Speaker:

Couple of examples of that, one will be local Premier in Queensland, Stephen

Speaker:

Myles, and a press conference he was at.

Speaker:

And then looking at the situation in Gaza and, um, Israel and just the way

Speaker:

our thinking about that is manipulated by propaganda and how insidious it is.

Speaker:

So not the shocking beat up about um, Barnaby Joyce.

Speaker:

And I wasn't even going to mention Barnaby Joyce, but um,

Speaker:

but seeing you have, Joe, um.

Speaker:

Yeah, he was found sprawled on the street in Canberra, and it's just a

Speaker:

different treatment isn't it, like the right wing side basically abused

Speaker:

the people who took the video of him and said they should have been helping

Speaker:

Barnaby rather than selling the video to the news groups, and didn't want

Speaker:

to condemn him because he's I couldn't really judge what had happened and would

Speaker:

have to talk to Barnaby to see what the truth was, so Well, no, apparently the

Speaker:

truth was he'd taken some medication which reacted badly with alcohol.

Speaker:

Which he'd been warned about, but it wasn't at all his fault.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Well, we'll leave that, if you like, dear listener.

Speaker:

That's one version of the story, so, um So yeah, that was Barnaby.

Speaker:

But yeah, we're going to talk about, um, media and, and how You've just got

Speaker:

to be alert to what the media's doing, and once you are, you just spot these

Speaker:

things from a mile away, I think, but so few people are alert to these things.

Speaker:

It's very frustrating.

Speaker:

Um, so we'll talk about that, and a little bit about, uh, Tucker interviewing

Speaker:

Putin, um, a little bit about Joe Biden sliding into dementia, and then locally,

Speaker:

the right for employees to disconnect and ignore emails from the boss after work.

Speaker:

And a unique solution to our submarine problem, Joe, I didn't warn you about,

Speaker:

which involves stealing a submarine.

Speaker:

So, stay tuned for that one, dear listener.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

So, um, yeah, okay, so Stephen Miles recently appointed as Queensland Premier

Speaker:

because Anastasia Palaszczuk resigned, he got the gig, and, um, so, in my circles,

Speaker:

dear listener, I do have contact with.

Speaker:

The conservative boomer class of Australia.

Speaker:

So, one sort of avenue to that, um, to that pool of thought comes via right

Speaker:

wing Tony, who I Um, correspond with and talk to and unfortunately follow on his

Speaker:

Facebook page, which saves me the trouble of subscribing to Sky News because Tony

Speaker:

virtually reposts whatever they're doing.

Speaker:

And then just um, uh, down at the Gold Coast in the complex that we

Speaker:

stay in frequently, um, group of older people gather together there

Speaker:

in the pool and talk about stuff.

Speaker:

And they're an older boomer generation of the conservative

Speaker:

end, most of them, not all.

Speaker:

But um, anyway, my wife came back from being in the pool with this group

Speaker:

and she said, Have you heard about what the Stephen Miles has done and

Speaker:

laughing at, at um, victims of crime?

Speaker:

And well, everybody in the pool is saying it's disgusting that they were talking

Speaker:

about that lady who was murdered by the African gangs and that um And then Stephen

Speaker:

Myles was laughing about it, and I said, I spend so much time reading things, and

Speaker:

I hadn't come across any of this, but of course I wasn't listening to Sky News.

Speaker:

And I said, sure as eggs, this will be some sort of Sky

Speaker:

News beat up over something.

Speaker:

So a few Googles and whatever.

Speaker:

And, uh, I've got the clip, anyway, of what happened, so I'll play the clip and

Speaker:

then I'll provide the context for it.

Speaker:

So here we go.

Speaker:

The absence of any reference to youth crime in your speech to the Queensland

Speaker:

Media Club would have been noted.

Speaker:

Um, by more than a few, including the people of those communities.

Speaker:

Premier, I'm sure you can see the last two summers have been bookended.

Speaker:

By the murders of young mother, Emma Lovell, and just three

Speaker:

days ago, Grandmother, Violet.

Speaker:

So, for those who can't watch the video, he was initially chuckling at the

Speaker:

beginning of the question, and then as the questioner started listing the names of

Speaker:

those people, his face got more serious.

Speaker:

Joe, have you seen that clip before?

Speaker:

Are you aware of this brouhaha?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Did that look particularly condemning to you, of Stephen Miles?

Speaker:

Did you look at it and go, what's going on here?

Speaker:

He seemed to be chuckling about the question being a bit random.

Speaker:

It was more, uh, he was shocked by the question just being

Speaker:

out of what he was expecting.

Speaker:

I think, yeah, I think he was more laughing about the

Speaker:

bizarreness of the question.

Speaker:

Correct.

Speaker:

The context is that he was there.

Speaker:

At an event which was to talk about their, um, uh, housing solution that the

Speaker:

Queensland Government has come up with.

Speaker:

And um, so it's, it's a press conference for housing and the

Speaker:

Brisbane Bureau Chief for Sky News, Adam Walters, asked Miles why he had

Speaker:

not addressed the subject earlier.

Speaker:

of, you know, violent crime in his speech, to which Miles said

Speaker:

it was a speech about housing.

Speaker:

So, that all happened before that question.

Speaker:

So, Sky News saying, why didn't you just talk about violence, uh, and why'd

Speaker:

you leave that out of your speech?

Speaker:

And Miles said, it's a speech about housing.

Speaker:

And then, the reporter from Sky News.

Speaker:

continued with asking a question about street violence, youth crime, and it

Speaker:

was because he pushed again on something that Miles had dismissed, that Miles,

Speaker:

you know, smiled and said, oh, come on.

Speaker:

And that is the context that people Need to understand when

Speaker:

they're watching that video.

Speaker:

And of course, the Sky News clip of it doesn't give you that context.

Speaker:

You've got to go and find it.

Speaker:

Joe, it's just frustrating that people would think, even as much as you might

Speaker:

hate the Labor Party and the Premier and whatever, it's, it's just not likely that

Speaker:

That somebody in his position is going to be laughing about somebody's murder.

Speaker:

No, I don't think so.

Speaker:

I think that's You have to think, what is going on here?

Speaker:

What's the context?

Speaker:

There must have been some reason.

Speaker:

What, what is the wider thing going on here?

Speaker:

But so many people, A, didn't ask what that wider context might be.

Speaker:

And then B, Joe, in this, um, sort of Twitter post that I was looking at, which

Speaker:

described This context and the reasons.

Speaker:

You've still got half the people in the comment section

Speaker:

saying, Oh, thank you very much.

Speaker:

It's nice to know the context.

Speaker:

That'll make sense now.

Speaker:

Wish I'd known that.

Speaker:

But then these other half still going, makes no difference at all.

Speaker:

The guy's a scumbag.

Speaker:

Fancy laughing at violence and made no difference to their view whatsoever.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, I think it's very much All about tribes, isn't it?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, it really doesn't matter.

Speaker:

It's given us an excuse to be outraged, and our tribe is outraged,

Speaker:

therefore we'll be outraged.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, and thinking doesn't come into it.

Speaker:

It's all to do with being a good member of the tribe.

Speaker:

And if you're a good member of the tribe, you're outraged.

Speaker:

Yeah, I just, it's so frustrating and disappointing, like, if something

Speaker:

really weird came out about Peter Dutton or something, laughing at

Speaker:

something like that, you'd just go, hang on a minute, what was the context?

Speaker:

I'd like to think I would anyway.

Speaker:

I mean, the whole Barnaby falling off a planter box.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

It is, is in character.

Speaker:

I don't want to cast suspicions, but apparently he has a reputation

Speaker:

for liking a bevy or two.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, so him falling over drunk in Canberra is not a shocking thing, and

Speaker:

therefore doesn't require much scrutiny.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Whereas Barnaby, I don't know, laughing at some Christian thing

Speaker:

would be so out of context.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

But whether it was true or not, you'd be going, hang on, that doesn't sound right.

Speaker:

People have lost the capacity, Joe, to just go.

Speaker:

There's something fishy about this, something not quite right.

Speaker:

I mean, the guys made it to Premier of the State.

Speaker:

You've got to have just a little bit of brains, if only when

Speaker:

it comes to media management.

Speaker:

Like, you've got to know how to kiss a baby and pat a dog.

Speaker:

Preferably don't get them mixed up.

Speaker:

And um, give some people some credit and just think.

Speaker:

But I just think, Joe, that I think the older generation is just way

Speaker:

too trusting of traditional media.

Speaker:

I know there's the tribalism aspect that you said, but I also think there's

Speaker:

just this inherent trust that if If they see it on the news or read it

Speaker:

in a paper, they give it far more trust than younger people would think.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, I think it was around the 80s it all changed, wasn't it?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So people who grew up with the media before the 80s were

Speaker:

used to a level of diligence.

Speaker:

Um, and the media was big money.

Speaker:

Now the media is scrabbling for pennies.

Speaker:

Um, so they are journalists, they literally churn out whatever they

Speaker:

can, um, and if somebody's gonna write a press release on their behalf,

Speaker:

uh, and they have to do the minimum amount of work, they'll take it.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And I think, um, Murdoch has, well, it was, um, Fox News

Speaker:

was the original, wasn't it?

Speaker:

It was a Republican Uh, press department, effectively.

Speaker:

But even, you know, the Australian used to be a proper newspaper, and it changed,

Speaker:

and the people who read it, there's a lot of people who still think of it

Speaker:

as the way it used to be, and not the way it is now, which is a caricature

Speaker:

of a right wing rag, who don't get it.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's a right wing broadsheet, isn't it?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And you know, I'll say to people, like I could go into that pool tomorrow and

Speaker:

say, um, Where did you get this from?

Speaker:

You know it's from Sky News, you know that they're biased.

Speaker:

Yeah they're biased, but then the ABC and the Guardian are biased.

Speaker:

So they're all, you know, it's just evens out.

Speaker:

I could, I've got to start getting a spiel ready on the bias of the ABC, Joe.

Speaker:

So my question would be, okay, they're biased in the

Speaker:

opposite direction, you believe.

Speaker:

Okay, do you watch them?

Speaker:

Do you, do you take your news from them as well and try and

Speaker:

work out where the truth is?

Speaker:

Because if one side is lying in one direction and the other side is lying

Speaker:

in the other direction, Surely the truth is somewhere in the middle.

Speaker:

Excuse me, Joe, while I write that down.

Speaker:

That's really good.

Speaker:

Are you watching them as well?

Speaker:

Good point.

Speaker:

Are you watching them as well?

Speaker:

Because there's a lot of the ABC that has actually got a right wing bias.

Speaker:

For example, Insiders, compared by David Spears.

Speaker:

X NewsCorp very soft on, on the right wing ringers who come in

Speaker:

there, softball interviews, 'em.

Speaker:

The panelists are invariably from Murdoch Publications.

Speaker:

It's a very right wing show.

Speaker:

Occasionally has, you know, Nikki, Ava there.

Speaker:

But I mean, even Nick Ava, while she's currently viewed as left wing, used

Speaker:

to be, um, a right wing advi advisor for a right wing, um, politician.

Speaker:

I think so.

Speaker:

So there would be that, um, off the top of my head as well.

Speaker:

Um, Patricia Cavallis is, is no lefty.

Speaker:

Um, uh, the former 730er, Lee Sayles was not a lefty.

Speaker:

That didn't make it easy for the left and would softball the, the right.

Speaker:

And, um, another one off the top of my head, um, Lisa

Speaker:

Miller is another one on ABC.

Speaker:

Like, you can name presenters who Are, uh, are easily seen as being

Speaker:

potentially soft on the right wing.

Speaker:

But yeah, that's a good one, Joe.

Speaker:

I'll try, I'll report back as to how that, um, how that goes.

Speaker:

Is to say, why are you watching them as well and trying to work out where the

Speaker:

truth might lie between the two of them.

Speaker:

I mean, my news feed is Apple News and I deliberately haven't liked or

Speaker:

disliked any content, so I get a balance.

Speaker:

And I can literally, by the headline, pick out where it's coming from.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

I can go, that's a Murdoch one.

Speaker:

That's a Murdoch beat up, I can guarantee that.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Just by the headline.

Speaker:

Um, and the same with the Guardian.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Or even worse, some of the others, like Jezebel and, um, uh, Mamma

Speaker:

Mia is the latest mis influenced.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah, you see the headline.

Speaker:

My bastard husband was a bastard, and you go, that's got to be Mamma Mia.

Speaker:

Well, maybe he was.

Speaker:

Maybe he was, but I mean, you can tell it's every headline that

Speaker:

comes up in the news feed from them is about men behaving badly.

Speaker:

Okay, five ways to determine whether your partner is a bad

Speaker:

dad or something like that.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's just, whether they're balanced, what pops up in my

Speaker:

news feed just follows a content.

Speaker:

That's it.

Speaker:

The same as the Murdoch stuff does, the Sky News, the um, uh, Daily Fail.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, actually, I don't know if Daily Mail is Murdoch, but

Speaker:

it's definitely right wing.

Speaker:

Um, look, I think it was the Daily Mail that told the backstory, at

Speaker:

least, of this Stephen Miles story that I've just been explaining.

Speaker:

So I think I got the quotes from that, so, um, so, yeah.

Speaker:

Just frustrating that People, A, don't look for the backstory, they

Speaker:

don't suspect, um, they don't see the smoke and think there might be fire

Speaker:

here, and then even when they are told, tribalism kicks in and they go,

Speaker:

well he's just an idiot anyway and he still should be kicked out, argh.

Speaker:

Yeah I mean I think it's very much a, rather than challenging their assertions,

Speaker:

is asking them how they got to that position and what would change their mind.

Speaker:

Is the, is the sneaking attack.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Lots of comments coming through on the chat.

Speaker:

I'm going to try and address the chat at the end.

Speaker:

I was listening to a podcast the other day and they sort of did a

Speaker:

whole show where they just address their chat as a separate item.

Speaker:

And I think what we might try and do is at the end of this, um, we'll

Speaker:

just go back to the comments and try and address them at the end.

Speaker:

So keep making your comments and I think we'll try and run through

Speaker:

them towards the end rather than interrupting the discussion.

Speaker:

Um, with the comments.

Speaker:

Let's try that, see how it goes.

Speaker:

So anyway, that was Stephen Miles and my frustration with the Australian

Speaker:

boomer class on that issue.

Speaker:

And, um, let's just think about Palestine, Gaza, Israel for a moment.

Speaker:

Um, so, more than half a million Palestinians, one in four, are

Speaker:

starving in Gaza, according to the UN.

Speaker:

1.

Speaker:

3 million displaced Palestinians live on the streets.

Speaker:

of the southern city of Rafah, which Israel designated a safe

Speaker:

zone, but has begun to bomb.

Speaker:

Families shiver in the winter rains under flimsy tarps amid pools of raw sewerage.

Speaker:

An estimated 90 percent of cars, as 2.

Speaker:

3 million people have been driven from their homes.

Speaker:

Joe, is there any end, what's the end game here for Israel?

Speaker:

Is this just going to drive these people to starvation?

Speaker:

The end game is a The depopulated Gaza Strip, isn't it?

Speaker:

They're either going to die of starvation or disease at the rate it's going.

Speaker:

Or be refugees in another country.

Speaker:

Yeah, or just be blown to bits by bombs in the meantime.

Speaker:

They're just not letting up.

Speaker:

Um, also, we did that, um, discussion about the, uh, UNRWA.

Speaker:

The U N R W A, which was like the aid organisation.

Speaker:

And There were allegations that a dozen employees in an organisation

Speaker:

that has, I don't know, whether it was 10, 000 employees, it's a big

Speaker:

organisation, an allegation by Israel that a handful were members of Hamas.

Speaker:

And on the basis of the Israeli allegation, the US, Australia and a

Speaker:

bunch of others, decided that they were going to stop funding that organisation.

Speaker:

If any organisation needed money, if there were a group of people needing

Speaker:

aid, it's pretty clear that they did.

Speaker:

You know, my, my view was, I don't care if it's proved that they were Hamas.

Speaker:

I don't care if a thousand of them are Hamas.

Speaker:

If a, if a reasonable proportion of the aid will find its way to Palestinians

Speaker:

in Gaza, then that's good enough for me.

Speaker:

Give them the aid.

Speaker:

I say.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean the concern is that your aid is going to get diverted

Speaker:

off to fund a terrorist group.

Speaker:

And I don't care if a large proportion is, because I just think the people, the

Speaker:

innocent people there who had nothing to do with anything that went on on

Speaker:

October 7th, um, deserve some help.

Speaker:

But anyway, um, so Caitlin Johnston, um, one of my favourite bloggers,

Speaker:

and she's, we'll be quoting her a lot in this episode, actually, um.

Speaker:

Dear listener, um, much of your subscription money to this podcast

Speaker:

ends up with Caitlin Johnston and the John Manatee blog, as well as, uh,

Speaker:

an economist called Michael Hudson and a couple of things I subscribe to

Speaker:

because I have to, like the Courier Mail and the Guardian and whatever.

Speaker:

But anyway.

Speaker:

Uh, Caitlin does get some of, uh, your money via me, because it,

Speaker:

uh, uh, gets returned back to her.

Speaker:

So, anyway, a few articles from her, and, so she says that Australian Foreign

Speaker:

Minister Penny Wong has acknowledged that Canberra joined, um, a bunch of

Speaker:

other countries in cutting off the funding without having seen proof of

Speaker:

Israel's claims against the organisation.

Speaker:

And as she said, if you're going to say a bad thing happened and we therefore

Speaker:

need to cut off aid to the most aid dependent population on earth, then

Speaker:

you'd better at least be able to prove the bad thing actually happened.

Speaker:

If evidence exists, then show it.

Speaker:

If you insist on starving two million people, you can't do it on vibes alone.

Speaker:

And um, she says, how is this not obvious to everyone?

Speaker:

How is it not immediately obvious the instant it came up?

Speaker:

Yeah, so, I think Penny Bond's been wanting to reverse that decision

Speaker:

and start funding again, I think.

Speaker:

Fair enough.

Speaker:

Not sure of the latest.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, um, still Caitlin Johnston, returning back to our original theme.

Speaker:

So, we talked about Miles and the sort of propaganda of Sky News, and now we're just

Speaker:

going to sort of look at the propaganda in relation to Gaza, Palestine, Israel.

Speaker:

So Joe, did you happen to see Tucker Carlson's interview with Vladimir Putin?

Speaker:

Strangely enough, no.

Speaker:

You've had lots of time on your hands.

Speaker:

Yes, I don't tend to follow Tucker Carlson anyway.

Speaker:

Yeah, neither do I.

Speaker:

Mr Putin, I don't know, uh, I would trust a word that comes out of his mouth.

Speaker:

Yes, that's fair enough.

Speaker:

Any other politician?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, even if you thought that he was, even if you were convinced that he was

Speaker:

lying with every second sentence, I still think it's worthwhile watching,

Speaker:

because the guy at least is intelligent and in control of his faculties.

Speaker:

And can run a compelling argument, now it might be littered with bullshit,

Speaker:

but um, there is a brain and an intellect operating there, far and

Speaker:

above what Joe Biden or Donald Trump or Boris Johnson or Rishi Sunak or

Speaker:

Anthony Albanese or others might offer.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, Boris Johnson, I, I think, was one of those, he played

Speaker:

a character of a bumbling fool, but apparently, he was a very intelligent

Speaker:

man, is a very intelligent man.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, and the bumbling fool allowed him to get away with

Speaker:

some absolutely shitty things.

Speaker:

True.

Speaker:

If you do an intelligence test, um, IQ test, uh, probably

Speaker:

Boris Johnson would come out.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I'll do that on that.

Speaker:

I mean, Biden, Trump, yes, absolutely.

Speaker:

I think he's a bumbling fool.

Speaker:

Um, and Biden, I think he's in his dotage.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Uh, I don't know that it really matters in America because

Speaker:

aren't they just puppets anyway?

Speaker:

We'll get onto that.

Speaker:

We'll talk more about that.

Speaker:

But, um, I think it was just interesting that he, he's, yeah, it was probably an

Speaker:

hour and a half or two Sit down discussion between Putin and Tucker Carlson.

Speaker:

It was kind of like a podcast.

Speaker:

It was just long form conversation and at one point really in the very beginning

Speaker:

the first half hour or so Putin's really giving a description of Russian Ukrainian

Speaker:

history as a means of trying to show that this geographical area currently known as

Speaker:

Ukraine has always been You know, Russian, if you like, and, um, actually it was

Speaker:

Turkish, uh, yes, you, maybe you should listen to what he says, Joe, and then

Speaker:

you can put it apart wherever you like.

Speaker:

I'm, I'm, I'm summarising.

Speaker:

He, he may well have mentioned some Turkish involvement there, I can't

Speaker:

remember, but, um, uh, at one point sort of Tucker Carlson is trying to, Sort of

Speaker:

rein him in and say, yeah, but come on, let's, let's move on and talk about,

Speaker:

you know, the war in Ukraine now and, and that, and Putin basically says to

Speaker:

him, you know, Are you doing a show or are we having a real discussion here?

Speaker:

Are we having a real conversation?

Speaker:

You know, I thought we were gonna have a conversation, a real genuine

Speaker:

conversation, not just some show, and then he says, bear with me.

Speaker:

Let me just keep going here.

Speaker:

It's all, you'll understand why I've said it as I get through it.

Speaker:

That sort of, um, response.

Speaker:

You know, without wanting to go Godwin's Law, I'm sure if you sat down with Hitler

Speaker:

for half an hour and had a conversation, he would tell you the history of Jews in

Speaker:

Europe and why they were such a bad people and why they deserved to be wiped out.

Speaker:

Yeah, and at the end of it I'm sure you could have a long form conversation

Speaker:

which would absolutely justify his Yes.

Speaker:

Um, behaviour.

Speaker:

Yes, and at the end of it you might go, that was a pack of lies, but gee, it

Speaker:

was a well constructed pack of lies.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's my point.

Speaker:

That's my point about the Putin interview.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

It might well be a pack of lies, but it was a well constructed,

Speaker:

elucidated pack of lies, is my point.

Speaker:

That's my first point.

Speaker:

Yeah, I'm sure he has to sell it internally.

Speaker:

Yes, and maybe to other countries in the global south and who's Possible.

Speaker:

And China and other states like that.

Speaker:

So, um, so yeah, um, anyway, during the interview, Putin implied

Speaker:

that NATO powers were behind the Nord Stream pipeline bombing.

Speaker:

Shocking.

Speaker:

And Tucker Carlson responded by asking Putin why he didn't

Speaker:

present evidence to the world so as to win a propaganda victory.

Speaker:

And Putin said, Quote, in the war of propaganda, it's very difficult to

Speaker:

defeat the United States because the United States controls all the world's

Speaker:

media and many European media, so, um, he sort of just made the point.

Speaker:

Uh, what's the point?

Speaker:

Um, the United States are the champions when it comes to propaganda.

Speaker:

They control too much.

Speaker:

Um, basically, I, I wouldn't win that propaganda war.

Speaker:

And, um, Clayton Johnson says I was going to say, I don't know

Speaker:

that the United States do, but certainly vested interests do.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

The Western oligarchs do.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Uh, yes.

Speaker:

And then, but the state Kind of gets what it wants because it kind of, the

Speaker:

oligarchs I would say, if anything, the US is a tool of the oligarchs,

Speaker:

rather than the other way around.

Speaker:

Yes, and that the state is the result of what the oligarchs want.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And if that's the case, then the state is probably going to provide The

Speaker:

propaganda that the oligarchs want.

Speaker:

Yeah, but I think it's the oligarchs who, the oligarchs own the press.

Speaker:

Yeah, although let me just get on to that because, um, so, Caitlin Johnson

Speaker:

says, The US empire has by far the most sophisticated and effective propaganda

Speaker:

machine ever to have existed, um, operating with such complexity that

Speaker:

most people don't even know it exists.

Speaker:

And in a fact checking article, Five Lies and One Truth, from Putin's interview

Speaker:

with Tucker Carlson, Politico Europe labels the claim, um, by Putin that

Speaker:

America is the king of propaganda.

Speaker:

And the reason that Politico Europe says that is because Russia

Speaker:

has a state run media, whereas the US media is privately owned.

Speaker:

According to the Politico fact checking article pooh poohing Putin's theory,

Speaker:

they said, quote, The biggest news media companies are privately owned

Speaker:

and operate without direct government control, in contrast to the state

Speaker:

controlled media landscape in Russia.

Speaker:

And this was written by Politico's Sergei Goryazko.

Speaker:

He said, he added, Russian state TV and the primary news agencies there

Speaker:

are the property of the government.

Speaker:

And the Kremlin controls other media or destroys those not willing to collaborate.

Speaker:

So he's saying Russia's a bigger propaganda machine because

Speaker:

it owns the media, whereas in the US, it's privately owned.

Speaker:

At the bottom of the article from Politico, it reads, Sergei Goriosko

Speaker:

is hosted at Politico under EU funded EU for Free Media Residency Program.

Speaker:

And according to Caitlin Johnston, EU for Free Media is a European Union narrative

Speaker:

management operation set up to help integrate Russian journalists in exile

Speaker:

into leading European publications, i.

Speaker:

e.

Speaker:

to provide maximum media amplification to Russian expats who have a to pick

Speaker:

with the current government in Moscow.

Speaker:

It is run with the participation from Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty,

Speaker:

which are US government funded media operations under the umbrella of the

Speaker:

US Propaganda Services umbrella, USAGM.

Speaker:

So the guy who was saying Putin is wrong because you are, you know,

Speaker:

Western media is privately owned.

Speaker:

Worked for Politico, which is essentially funded by the US government, in a, in

Speaker:

a summary, and creates these sorts of organisations to give the appearance

Speaker:

of independent media commenting when in fact they're owned and operated

Speaker:

essentially by the US government.

Speaker:

Interesting case study, I thought.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, Radio Europe is certainly known as a CIA front from the Cold War.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Or Radio Free Europe, I remember.

Speaker:

It was certainly well known.

Speaker:

As being a CIA front.

Speaker:

Um, the big difference is, you know, as shitty as, um, the West

Speaker:

have been to Julian Assange, Um, he still hasn't fallen out of a window.

Speaker:

Well, he doesn't Has he?

Speaker:

No, but he's been locked away in Belmarsh Prison, like, you know, just

Speaker:

like the, uh, the Russian opposition leaders in a Siberian prison.

Speaker:

Julian's in a Belmarsh high security prison.

Speaker:

Belmarsh is slightly better than the Gulag.

Speaker:

It's one of the worst prisons he could possibly be in.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

It's a really hardcore, terrible prison to be.

Speaker:

Um.

Speaker:

Totally inappropriate for somebody who's committed the sort of, even if

Speaker:

true, the crimes that are alleged.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, look, um, one doesn't justify the other, but I think

Speaker:

there's, uh, there's a different scale.

Speaker:

of, uh, dealing with the opposition.

Speaker:

You know, at least, at least say the Russian opposition

Speaker:

leader was arrested in Russia.

Speaker:

Well, yes.

Speaker:

For supposed crimes against Russia, and put in a Siberian jail.

Speaker:

Julian Assange, an Australian citizen, is not even in America, and he's

Speaker:

arrested for breaching an American crime.

Speaker:

And he's not even in America!

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Like, doesn't Anyway.

Speaker:

That's another rabbit hole.

Speaker:

We might refer to that later as well.

Speaker:

So, um, so as Caitlin Johnson says, there's an old joke that says, uh,

Speaker:

A Soviet and an American are on an aeroplane seated next to each other.

Speaker:

And, um, the American asks, Why are you flying to the US?

Speaker:

And the Soviet guy replies, To study American propaganda.

Speaker:

The American replies, What American propaganda?

Speaker:

The Soviet says, Exactly.

Speaker:

It's true.

Speaker:

It's really true.

Speaker:

People don't see it.

Speaker:

So, as she says, let's talk about that sort of private ownership of

Speaker:

media, as opposed to government.

Speaker:

She says anyone who's wealthy enough to control a mass media platform

Speaker:

is going to have a vested interest in preserving the status quo upon

Speaker:

which their wealth is premised.

Speaker:

And they will co operate with establishment power structures

Speaker:

in various ways towards that end.

Speaker:

That make sense?

Speaker:

The fact that these mass media outlets look independent, but function as

Speaker:

propaganda organs for the US Empire, allows its propaganda to fly into

Speaker:

people's minds without triggering any gag reflex of scepticism.

Speaker:

Which, uh, which would happen if people knew the outlets

Speaker:

were feeding them propaganda.

Speaker:

So propaganda only really has persuasive power.

Speaker:

If you don't know, it's happening to you.

Speaker:

Ah, the invisibility of U.

Speaker:

S.

Speaker:

propaganda is further aided by the subtle methods by which it is administered,

Speaker:

which we've seen exemplified beautifully in the coverage of Israel's ongoing U.

Speaker:

S.

Speaker:

backed atrocity in Gaza.

Speaker:

So, this is now we're going to talk about, dear listener, the way articles

Speaker:

and headlines are worded, um, uh, subtly.

Speaker:

The Intercept reports that a review of a thousand articles from the New York

Speaker:

Times, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times about Israel's war on Gaza.

Speaker:

found that the outlets consistently used word choices which served

Speaker:

Israeli information interests.

Speaker:

Highly emotive terms for the killing of civilians like Slaughter,

Speaker:

Massacre and Horrific were reserved almost exclusively for Israelis

Speaker:

who were killed by Palestinians, rather than the other way around.

Speaker:

Um, and in the report, the term slaughter was used by editors and

Speaker:

reporters to describe the killing of Israelis versus Palestinians, 60 to 1.

Speaker:

And massacre was used to describe the killing of Israelis versus Palestinians.

Speaker:

125 to 2, and horrific was used to describe the killing of Israelis

Speaker:

versus Palestinians 36 to 4.

Speaker:

I find that useful, Joe, because, you know, I could say, as I did before, Oh,

Speaker:

well, you know, Lisa Miller, David Spears, Lee Sayles, whatever, you know, I consider

Speaker:

them fairly right wing ABC journalists.

Speaker:

And it's hard to quantify that feeling, other than just saying I'm a critical

Speaker:

watcher and this is the view I've come to.

Speaker:

But to be able to actually look at words like slaughter, massacre, um,

Speaker:

horrific, and see such an imbalance of when those words are used, in a

Speaker:

situation where we've got such a horrific massacre occurring in Gaza, and every

Speaker:

reason to use those words, I find it really compelling argument, um, so.

Speaker:

That was a useful report, and that's the sort of thing that, you know, okay, The

Speaker:

Intercept's a very left wing magazine, but, uh, or outlet, but I think when

Speaker:

they say they've counted those words and that's what they get, I think we

Speaker:

can trust that that would be correct.

Speaker:

So, as Caitlin Johnston says, this is the sort of manipulation that a

Speaker:

casual news consumer wouldn't notice.

Speaker:

Unless you're on alert for bias, um, Do you hear about that girl, Joe, in

Speaker:

Gaza who was, um, trapped in a car, her family were killed, she was the

Speaker:

only one alive, somehow gets on the phone, I think, I think she's six years

Speaker:

old, and she sort of rung saying, you know, help me, um, I'm really scared

Speaker:

and I need help, and ambulance was sent and it was blown up as well.

Speaker:

Um, cute little girl, terrible.

Speaker:

Terrible thing to imagine happening to somebody.

Speaker:

So, in the reporting of that, um, is another illustration

Speaker:

of how things are worded.

Speaker:

So, in the um, CNN, New York Times, BBC, reporting on that story used

Speaker:

headlines such as, Five year old Palestinian girl found dead after being

Speaker:

trapped in car under Israeli fire.

Speaker:

Also, missing six year old and rescue team found dead in Gaza, aid group says.

Speaker:

And Hind Rajab, six, found dead in Gaza days after phone calls for help.

Speaker:

That was the Western media.

Speaker:

In contrast, Al Jazeera reported, body of six year old killed in deliberate

Speaker:

Israeli fire found after 12 days.

Speaker:

And the Middle East Eye, um, used the words, Hind Rajab, Palestinian

Speaker:

girl found dead after being trapped under Israeli fire for days.

Speaker:

So, it's this sort of softballing description versus the more

Speaker:

explicit blaming of Israelis.

Speaker:

And it's easy to spot the difference.

Speaker:

When you have them side by side like that, but if you're just reading

Speaker:

one outlet, you don't pick that up.

Speaker:

Um, another example she mentions is, last month the BBC published

Speaker:

an article titled, Record number of civilians hurt by explosives in 2023.

Speaker:

As though they were mishandling fireworks, or something.

Speaker:

Instead of being actively killed by Israeli bombs.

Speaker:

So, the headline was, Record number of civilians hurt by explosives in 2023,

Speaker:

um, uh, contrast this with the BBC's headlines when reporting on Ukrainians

Speaker:

killed by Russians, and the headline would be, Ukraine more, Russian airstrikes

Speaker:

claim five lives in Kiev and Mikhailov.

Speaker:

Uh, or Ukraine War, baby killed in Russian strike on Kharkiv Hotel.

Speaker:

So, in Ukraine, people die from bombs because Russia launched

Speaker:

Russian airstrikes and killed them.

Speaker:

Whereas in Gaza, people get hurt by explosions because they got too close

Speaker:

to some type of explosive material.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

It's their own fault.

Speaker:

Yeah, really interesting examples.

Speaker:

So, the concluding comments in this great article.

Speaker:

These little manipulations fly under the radar if you're

Speaker:

not on the lookout for them.

Speaker:

Such as the brilliance of the US Empire's invisible propaganda machine.

Speaker:

That's why it's very difficult to win a propaganda war against the United States.

Speaker:

That's why Westerners have been so successfully manipulated into

Speaker:

accepting a status quo of endless war.

Speaker:

Echo Side, Injustice and Exploitation, and that's why the world looks

Speaker:

the way it looks right now.

Speaker:

So, yeah, there we go, media manipulation.

Speaker:

It's a sad toy, story.

Speaker:

Um, we mentioned previously, just earlier.

Speaker:

About Joe Biden and, uh, how he's sort of apparently slipping into the dotage.

Speaker:

Is that the word you used?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, he has been investigated in relation to mishandling some classified documents.

Speaker:

And the good news is that they've decided that criminal charges

Speaker:

are not warranted in this matter.

Speaker:

So that's the good news for Joe Biden fans.

Speaker:

The bad news, for Joe Biden fans, is the reason given, and basically, that

Speaker:

he's such a forgetful old man, and that's the way that he would come across

Speaker:

in a trial, that, um, um, uh, it'll likely convince some jurors that he

Speaker:

made an innocent mistake, rather than acted willfully, um, so, essentially,

Speaker:

the reasons given for not proceeding were, uh, his mental, you Memory is

Speaker:

so poor, no one could be convinced that he really knew what he was doing.

Speaker:

Not the best way of getting off something, if you're the President of

Speaker:

the United States, but, uh, there you go.

Speaker:

Um, yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, um, I remember Neil deGrasse Tyson being interviewed and, yeah, what

Speaker:

would you do if you were President?

Speaker:

Or what would you do, who would you make President?

Speaker:

I can't remember.

Speaker:

Something along those lines.

Speaker:

And he said the problem isn't who's President, the problem is

Speaker:

who's voting for the President.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Uh, until, until you can change the infrastructure behind it, uh, who

Speaker:

is president really doesn't matter.

Speaker:

Right, well, who, who's running the empire in the, in the system?

Speaker:

Is that what you mean, rather than who's voting?

Speaker:

Because until, the voters don't get to change that either.

Speaker:

No, but I mean, even, even the voters, um, I think are disengaged.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

They don't care.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So just going on with this article, she says, uh, the U.

Speaker:

S.

Speaker:

empire has been marching along in exactly the same way it was before Biden took

Speaker:

office, completely unhindered by the fact that the person who's supposedly

Speaker:

calling the shots is in a state of degenerative neurological free fall.

Speaker:

Literally anyone could hold that office and it would make no meaningful difference

Speaker:

in the way the US Empire is run.

Speaker:

The globe spanning power structure that is centralised around the United States is

Speaker:

run not by the official elected government of that nation, but by unelected

Speaker:

empire managers who filter in and out of each administration and maintain a

Speaker:

steady presence in government agencies and government adjacent institutions.

Speaker:

These empire managers form alliances with corporate powers and

Speaker:

working relationships with them.

Speaker:

The many nations, assets and partners who function as members

Speaker:

of the undeclared US empire.

Speaker:

Which means there's really not any way for Americans to vote

Speaker:

their way out of this mess.

Speaker:

Voting in Western democracies is done to give us the illusion of control.

Speaker:

I like this bit here coming up, uh, Voting in Western democracies is done

Speaker:

to give us the illusion of control.

Speaker:

Like letting a toddler play with a toy steering wheel.

Speaker:

Well, you drive so they can feel like they're participating.

Speaker:

Well, I, um, the fact that Trump was in power for four years and didn't

Speaker:

completely fuck the American economy.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Um, people talked about childminding him.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

That, that they basically didn't carry out his orders because they

Speaker:

knew he'd forget them in half an hour.

Speaker:

And we spoke in previous episodes recently about, I think, Victoria

Speaker:

Newland, who was the one involved with the, uh, the coup in the Ukraine.

Speaker:

Oh yeah.

Speaker:

Basically, it didn't matter whether it was a Republican or

Speaker:

Democrat, um, administration.

Speaker:

She got a job, with all of them, except when Trump was in power.

Speaker:

That was the only time that she wasn't in some high powered job.

Speaker:

So, um, that was one of the dangers and one of the reasons why.

Speaker:

Um, a lot of these people don't like Trump was because for the first time in

Speaker:

their careers, they would be on the outer.

Speaker:

So, yeah, there we go.

Speaker:

Unlike Kennedy, who completely fucked up the CIA's plan with the Bay of Pigs.

Speaker:

Um, so Kennedy?

Speaker:

Yeah, so, uh, yeah, they had a, they had a whole plan about the

Speaker:

US re invading or invading Cuba to bring back a right wing government.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And, and Kennedy basically pulled funding for it.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

He said no.

Speaker:

And that's, that's the whole basis of the CIA killed Kennedy.

Speaker:

Okay, so this was after the Bay of Pigs, this was another, another shot at it.

Speaker:

No, this was the Bay of, Bay of Pigs, basically, um, Kennedy

Speaker:

pulled all the support out.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And said, we can't have American assets, it has to be Cubans only.

Speaker:

Gave a whole bunch of, you can't do this, you can't do that, laid down the

Speaker:

law, and apparently that was because, that's why it was such a, a screw up.

Speaker:

Ah, see I'd heard a different story.

Speaker:

I'd heard he was really pissed with them, that he'd allowed him, that

Speaker:

he'd allowed them to talk him into it.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

That was the version I heard.

Speaker:

Certainly there was a big fallout with the CIA over Bay of Pigs.

Speaker:

Yeah, the version I heard was he was so pissed with them for getting it so wrong.

Speaker:

It was like, what sort of fucking advice is this from these guys?

Speaker:

That was a disaster.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

The other one I read, the other thing about him was, you know, when

Speaker:

they were deciding what to do when, because Russia was sending the nuclear

Speaker:

weapons over, and the Americans were deciding on their response.

Speaker:

And Robert Kennedy, I think, said to Joe Kennedy, we're having all

Speaker:

these meetings, but there's a danger here that everybody is agreeing with

Speaker:

you because you're the president.

Speaker:

And they don't feel in this group situation that they can

Speaker:

give a contrary point of view.

Speaker:

And so they allowed the others to have meetings without Kennedy present.

Speaker:

So people felt freer to give an honest opinion about what they should

Speaker:

do and not allow the group think to All the sort of, the fear of going

Speaker:

against the President stopped them from saying what they wanted to say.

Speaker:

I believe that's what happened in the lead up to that.

Speaker:

Right, um, The right to disconnect, Joe, seems like lots of people

Speaker:

have a problem where their bosses expect them to be available for,

Speaker:

uh, being contacted after hours.

Speaker:

Either by phone calls or emails.

Speaker:

And the Centre for Future Work found that 71 percent of surveyed employees

Speaker:

worked outside their scheduled hours, largely to meet employer expectations.

Speaker:

Most of this time, most of this overtime was unpaid.

Speaker:

That could be just working late in the office, I guess, as

Speaker:

well as phone calls and emails.

Speaker:

Ever have a problem, Joe, with some boss expecting you to answer emails at

Speaker:

seven o'clock at night and saying, why didn't you get back to me about that?

Speaker:

Um, no, I mean, I've been in jobs where I've had on call and I've been in jobs

Speaker:

where, um, there was a, an expectation that out of hours work was done.

Speaker:

Um, and yes, it was unpaid, but it was time in lieu.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

So it was paid then, in that sense.

Speaker:

If you worked an hour at night, then it was considered.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, yes, um, I've always been in a, a skilled industry and therefore not,

Speaker:

not as subject to the vagaries of a boss.

Speaker:

But I certainly had, um, colleagues who were, um, told that they were not

Speaker:

allowed to take leave for two weeks out of the month because that was month

Speaker:

end and that they weren't allowed any leave at year end, financial year end.

Speaker:

And we're expected to work long hours and we're told not to put in overtime

Speaker:

claims for the hours that they worked.

Speaker:

Um, so I think it's very much down to, um, your employer's belief

Speaker:

on how easy you are to replace.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Is there a power imbalance or not?

Speaker:

Absolutely.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

And that's why I gave up on the union a long time ago, um, not so much

Speaker:

because I don't believe in unions but because, um, I wasn't really in

Speaker:

a position to be assisted by them but I have told everybody in a, um, more

Speaker:

easily replaced job to join a union.

Speaker:

I've always, you know, payroll, people like that who are deemed

Speaker:

replaceable by, uh, management.

Speaker:

I've always said join a union and get the best representation you can.

Speaker:

And um, my daughter's peers, again, I've pushed towards, um,

Speaker:

fair work and, um, the unions.

Speaker:

Okay, did she take your advice?

Speaker:

Uh, so, uh, Join a union?

Speaker:

Yes, and my daughter isn't a member of a union, but Oh,

Speaker:

she's not a member of a union?

Speaker:

So she hasn't taken your advice?

Speaker:

Well, um, she's not yet employed.

Speaker:

Oh, okay, right.

Speaker:

But her friends, yeah, yeah, my friends, uh, one of her friends

Speaker:

is an apprentice electrician.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And, uh, I was saying, you know, if, if you feel you're being underpaid,

Speaker:

you're not getting your, um, Shea used to work for, I forget who it was.

Speaker:

But I pointed them towards that group, passed all the details on,

Speaker:

and said, if you've got concerns about not being paid fairly, then

Speaker:

these are the people to talk to.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, so, Labor Government, supposedly happening today, don't know if it

Speaker:

happened, introducing legislation, basically, uh, to empower people

Speaker:

to be able to disconnect from work.

Speaker:

Of course,

Speaker:

if your employer is expecting you to answer emails and phone calls after

Speaker:

work and you say I don't have to and start waving the legislation in their

Speaker:

face, uh, will you find yourself shunted off to the side down the track?

Speaker:

Um, how powerful are you?

Speaker:

And can you be blocked?

Speaker:

Um, yeah, as a casual, if you turn down shifts, then you don't get offered shifts.

Speaker:

Find yourself missing from the Time table, next time.

Speaker:

Yeah, so anyway, Labor attempting to do that and also casual workers who have

Speaker:

regular work arrangements being able to say, well I've been casual this long,

Speaker:

you've had me working for example, every Thursday and Friday from 10 till 3, you

Speaker:

now have to offer me a permanent position.

Speaker:

Rather than just casual, so, that's good.

Speaker:

See, um, how that pans out.

Speaker:

I think the most interesting part of that is Peter Dutton came out and said

Speaker:

he's going to repeal the laws about, um, out of hours communications.

Speaker:

How are these guys going to win an election?

Speaker:

So does that mean we can ring Peter Dutton out of his work hours?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

If Ring him on his home line and say, hey, I want to talk to you

Speaker:

about this problem I'm having?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So yeah, this sort of right to disconnect, Dutton has said

Speaker:

they're going to repeal that.

Speaker:

And, um, he said that this law is damaging to relations between employers

Speaker:

and employees and it hurts productivity.

Speaker:

I, I, I agree with him.

Speaker:

I think since he's my MP, he should be available to me on call 24 hours a day

Speaker:

to deal with any problems that I have.

Speaker:

Yeah, try that.

Speaker:

And I, I want his personal phone number, as his employer.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I just think, how are these people expecting to win young voters, um?

Speaker:

Next week, well you sent me that article, we'll talk about it next week, yeah,

Speaker:

about the UK and young voters deserting the Conservative Party in the UK.

Speaker:

Dramatically.

Speaker:

And scarily not over here.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Not to the same extent, yeah.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, so, next week, Joe, for that article, because it was quite lengthy

Speaker:

and there were a lot of charts.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, but, um, but, if Dutton keeps making statements like this, He will

Speaker:

be heading in the same direction as the UK Conservatives in terms of his

Speaker:

relationship with young people, I think.

Speaker:

One can only hope.

Speaker:

Joe, we've spoken a lot about our problems with submarines over the years.

Speaker:

What a debacle the whole thing is.

Speaker:

There is, it seems, a debacle of the same type, frigates, and

Speaker:

I'll get my head around that.

Speaker:

Um, but I saw this thing that, um, I'll just read it, I think it was a tweet.

Speaker:

The Japanese make some peculiar television shows and movies, with however

Speaker:

commendable attention to strategy and detail, and there's a series out called

Speaker:

The Silent Service, in which a Japanese crew steals a US Navy nuclear submarine

Speaker:

during their familiarisation exercise.

Speaker:

Recommended viewing for our Royal Australian Navy Submariners.

Speaker:

During the early stages of their training exercises, might shave a few decades

Speaker:

off our acquisition of those submarines.

Speaker:

It's about the only way we're gonna get a nuclear sub out of the Yanks,

Speaker:

is to follow this model and steal one during a familiarization exercise.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, call me a cynic, but I don't think it was ever

Speaker:

about getting subs out of the U.

Speaker:

S.

Speaker:

Yeah, we mentioned the other day, last week, about single sex education.

Speaker:

Because there was that, um, Newington College becoming co ed, and some

Speaker:

of the parents, Joe, were crying, I guess, some of the old boys.

Speaker:

Yes, yeah, because he was going to have a grandchild and now he can't have a

Speaker:

grandchild Yeah, he wasn't gonna send his grandchild to that school now.

Speaker:

Yeah, not gonna have that There's an article here, which says that Just looking

Speaker:

at the debate of whether single sex schools perform better than co educational

Speaker:

schools and this is a tricky one.

Speaker:

So if you've got E.

Speaker:

g.

Speaker:

a girl, um, who might have an interest in maths and physics, there's been

Speaker:

an argument that girls perform better in all girl schools than they

Speaker:

do in co ed schools, for example, particularly for those subjects.

Speaker:

But, as the article explains, it's really hard to sort through the data because

Speaker:

so much of educational Uh, success relates to socio economic factors.

Speaker:

And the people who end up in single sex private schools are

Speaker:

at a higher socioeconomic level.

Speaker:

So it's really difficult to look at the data and compare girls of a

Speaker:

semi socioeconomic status in single sex schools with girls, for example,

Speaker:

of a similar socioeconomic status in co ed schools, because there's

Speaker:

just not enough single sex schools.

Speaker:

With that lower socio economic background.

Speaker:

The other question is, are exam results the sole measure of success?

Speaker:

Or do you want a well rounded person?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Because if you have someone who's got great exam scores, but is

Speaker:

totally inappropriate dealing with members of the opposite sex, Hmm.

Speaker:

Are they employable?

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Because I was hinting at that, uh, last week when I was saying how some of the

Speaker:

kids who ended up in university and, uh, operated under a disadvantage for

Speaker:

a few years till I figured things out.

Speaker:

I was one of them.

Speaker:

Um, but anyway.

Speaker:

For example, in Australia, 14 out of the 20 top performing schools in the

Speaker:

latest HSC round were single sex.

Speaker:

That was 8 all girls and 6 all boys.

Speaker:

And, um, uh, as we're top, uh, as we're 12 of the top performing schools

Speaker:

in the VCE, that must be Victoria.

Speaker:

So, um, but, um, here's the interesting part, Joe, is in Ireland.

Speaker:

Where is it in this?

Speaker:

I haven't highlighted it in this thing.

Speaker:

But apparently in Ireland, there's a lot of single sex schools and, um, which

Speaker:

are government run and do not have a, sort of, a selective enrolment bias.

Speaker:

Government funded?

Speaker:

Yes, government funded.

Speaker:

So don't have a A socio economic slant that's different so

Speaker:

much with the co ed schools.

Speaker:

And there's a link to a study which was done and it was by the British Educational

Speaker:

Research Journal that basically said they couldn't find Um, significant differences

Speaker:

in results when looking at the performance of kids in the different schools.

Speaker:

So it was more or less saying, when you've accounted for socioeconomic factors and

Speaker:

other issues, then there was no evidence that single sex schools led to greater

Speaker:

academic achievement as determined by objective scoring systems, Joe.

Speaker:

Hadn't heard that before, but that was, that was, um, that was interesting.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, um, so that's a rundown of the topics and let me, Joe, try and find,

Speaker:

I want to look at this chat now.

Speaker:

So, dear listener, uh, let me find, how do I get to the chat?

Speaker:

I want to scroll through, yeah, captions, chat.

Speaker:

There it is.

Speaker:

Sorry.

Speaker:

Thank you.

Speaker:

Um, so yeah, that's it dear listener in terms of.

Speaker:

The, uh, topics.

Speaker:

I thought we'd just quickly run through the chat and see what people had to say.

Speaker:

Watley and John saying hello.

Speaker:

Same with Joel, thank you.

Speaker:

Um, so John says that the Chaser podcast did a good wind up of Barnaby today.

Speaker:

Um, and John also says not to worry about Sky News and its propaganda because it

Speaker:

only has three people and a dog watching.

Speaker:

Yeah, the problem is, Joe, goddamn ABC takes its cues from From the Murdoch.

Speaker:

What's the news window, isn't it?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So yeah, nobody watches the bloody thing, but it does seem to set the agenda for

Speaker:

these people, including the A, B, C.

Speaker:

Um, uh, John says, my children have been discussing how casually racist

Speaker:

their grandmother has been lately.

Speaker:

I just pointed out the generation gap to them.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, I had a chat with dad about, um, he made some

Speaker:

comments that were possibly.

Speaker:

Not great about gay people and he said you have to remember that when I

Speaker:

was growing up being gay was illegal.

Speaker:

Yes You know Society has changed and sometimes it's very difficult to get

Speaker:

rid of your entrenched biases Um, Joel says ABC is very right wing.

Speaker:

It's their entertainment that is left leaning.

Speaker:

That would be true.

Speaker:

So someone like, um, Sean McAuliffe, um, he would say He was curing,

Speaker:

um, Scott Morrison and his group.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

The government of the day, yes.

Speaker:

He took, no doubt, great delight in that.

Speaker:

So, uh, yeah, that would be true.

Speaker:

It's their entertainment that is left leaning.

Speaker:

Good point, Joel.

Speaker:

Um, uh, Watley says, Seems legit.

Speaker:

Batboy will one day be president of the USA.

Speaker:

Who's Batboy?

Speaker:

This is about the Weekly Word News.

Speaker:

This is Don's comment.

Speaker:

It was the Men in Black.

Speaker:

Ah, OK.

Speaker:

So it was the newspaper in Men in Black.

Speaker:

You read to find out the truth because it was the one that was

Speaker:

telling you all about aliens abducting Elvis, or whatever it was.

Speaker:

Oh, okay.

Speaker:

Right, okay.

Speaker:

Um, John says Putin gives a history lesson from his point of view,

Speaker:

doesn't sound very convincing.

Speaker:

Whatley tells him to be objective.

Speaker:

Um, and, uh, Whatley says torture is better than murder, then, Joe.

Speaker:

I don't know what that means.

Speaker:

So that was talking about Julian Assange and the Russian journalists.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And the answer is, neither are great, but one person being tortured

Speaker:

is probably better than a hundred people being pushed out of windows.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

I think that neither side are great.

Speaker:

It's just a level of shittiness.

Speaker:

How many people were in Guantanamo, again?

Speaker:

Yeah, probably a hundred, but they weren't journalists, were they?

Speaker:

We're talking, okay, we're just talking people killed.

Speaker:

Okay, the American way isn't to push people out of windows, it's

Speaker:

just to bomb them, if they're brown and they're in a desert, you know.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Uh, and John says, please see who the report was done by, a

Speaker:

Republican endorsed official.

Speaker:

That was to do with Biden being senile.

Speaker:

Well this was the um, well I think this was the people looking at the

Speaker:

indictment, I think these were the lawyers looking at the indictment, John.

Speaker:

Yeah, apparently he's a Republican.

Speaker:

Right, okay.

Speaker:

Don't know.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

And that was the chat.

Speaker:

We'll try and do that every week, so if you do make a comment, you will be heard.

Speaker:

And, uh, there we go.

Speaker:

Scott was with us.

Speaker:

comment about our country was founded on the criminal element, justifying

Speaker:

we should steal the submarine.

Speaker:

But I'm thinking that maybe that's a good argument back to the, this nation

Speaker:

was founded on Christian values, was this nation was founded on criminals.

Speaker:

So does that justify us all being criminals now?

Speaker:

Are you reading that in the main chat on the, on the right?

Speaker:

Where did you read that?

Speaker:

Yes, scroll all the way down.

Speaker:

I still keep going and The last one I've got is by John saying,

Speaker:

please see who the report was done by, a Republican endorsed official.

Speaker:

There's another, there's another three under that.

Speaker:

Why haven't I, why can't I see them?

Speaker:

They're up on the screen, on the chat.

Speaker:

Maybe because they're on the screen that they don't appear in that right chat.

Speaker:

They do.

Speaker:

Okay, mine's not scrolling, but anyway.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Uh Uhhhh Don't forget, our country was founded on the criminal element,

Speaker:

so it's their patriotic duty to flog anything that isn't bolted to the floor.

Speaker:

Good one, Don.

Speaker:

Uh Monster Dutton or Voldemort, um, Chris says, why isn't there an option

Speaker:

other than Biden in the next election?

Speaker:

And, uh Because democracy is failing, Chris.

Speaker:

And um, uh, yeah, okay.

Speaker:

Those didn't appear in my right inside.

Speaker:

Anyway.

Speaker:

All right, dear listener, that is a wrap on this podcast, episode 417.

Speaker:

Scott wasn't with us.

Speaker:

He had other commitments.

Speaker:

He should be back next week.

Speaker:

And uh, yeah, I'll be back next week.

Speaker:

Joe will be my last podcast, hopefully wearing glasses.

Speaker:

So you're going to be blind the week after, are you?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, in the, after next week's podcast, I'm getting new intraocular lenses.

Speaker:

Well, synthetic ones put in.

Speaker:

Because I had cataracts appearing and they said, well, need to fix

Speaker:

that up and while we're at it Would you like some new lenses?

Speaker:

And you won't need glasses.

Speaker:

And I thought, wow, I've worn glasses since I was 16.

Speaker:

So that will be an interesting, life changing event for me.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

So next week, glasses, but then in the days following that, um, Don says he's

Speaker:

getting bionic eyes, Steve Austin style.

Speaker:

John and Chris say goodnight.

Speaker:

Goodnight to everybody.

Speaker:

We'll talk to you next week.

Speaker:

Bye for now.

Speaker:

And it's a good night from here, mate.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube