Artwork for podcast Blueprints of Disruption
Lessons From: South America
Episode 2815th December 2022 • Blueprints of Disruption • Rabble Rousers' Cooperative
00:00:00 01:17:30

Share Episode

Shownotes

With Canadian politics void of real resistance to Capitalism, the show looks to South America for some revolutionary lessons. Guest Alexander Moldovan shares some of what he learned while studying social movements in Venezuela, much of it by way of telling the stories of workers and communities fighting back while building networks of support. While examining the ways in which movements play a role in shaping the political landscape in South America, hosts Santiago Helou Quintero and Jessa McLean draw comparisons to Canadian situation.

Transcripts

Speaker:

Greetings, friends.

Speaker:

My name is Jessa McLean, and I'm

Speaker:

here to provide you with some

Speaker:

blueprints of disruption.

Speaker:

This weekly podcast is dedicated

Speaker:

to amplifying the work of activists,

Speaker:

examining power structures

Speaker:

and sharing the success stories from

Speaker:

the grassroots.

Speaker:

Through these discussions, we hope

Speaker:

to provide folks with the tools and

Speaker:

the inspiration they need to start

Speaker:

to dismantle capitalism, decolonize

Speaker:

our spaces, and bring about the

Speaker:

political revolution we

Speaker:

know we need.

Speaker:

Quite often on blueprints.

Speaker:

We talk about the limitations of

Speaker:

Canadian electoral politics, of

Speaker:

of liberal democracies.

Speaker:

And with all the issues we've raised

Speaker:

so far and all the inequities,

Speaker:

we still haven't even touched on.

Speaker:

I think it's easy to realize the

Speaker:

level of change we need will require

Speaker:

something we've just never seen here

Speaker:

in Canada.

Speaker:

The big question is always, how do

Speaker:

we get there?

Speaker:

Right now, consensus seems to be

Speaker:

that the socioeconomic conditions,

Speaker:

the political atmosphere in Canada

Speaker:

isn't at the point it needs

Speaker:

to be. In truth, Canada

Speaker:

has not seen the level of political

Speaker:

engagement and collective

Speaker:

mindset required to push

Speaker:

outside these confines of

Speaker:

our so-called democracy.

Speaker:

You know, outside of what we think

Speaker:

is possible.

Speaker:

So it's been a long time

Speaker:

since the working class have made

Speaker:

any significant gains.

Speaker:

In our last interview, John Clarke

Speaker:

reminded us that the courage to

Speaker:

meaningfully disrupt the system must

Speaker:

come from the base,

Speaker:

from the rank and file.

Speaker:

We've acknowledged many times on

Speaker:

here that the need to have organized

Speaker:

labor work hand in hand with social

Speaker:

movements, to mobilize

Speaker:

the population so we can activate

Speaker:

that collective power we keep

Speaker:

talking about.

Speaker:

That's true.

Speaker:

If we keep looking to Canadian

Speaker:

examples, we are going to have a

Speaker:

hard time building something new.

Speaker:

We are likely doomed to just keep

Speaker:

repeating the same patterns, working

Speaker:

within the same confines.

Speaker:

But if we look outside this

Speaker:

very limited scope.

Speaker:

If we examine movements

Speaker:

which have been successful,

Speaker:

we can start to make

Speaker:

the necessary foundations for

Speaker:

that revolution.

Speaker:

So in this episode, we are going to

Speaker:

look at South American social

Speaker:

movements, a cursory

Speaker:

look that honestly ends up asking

Speaker:

more questions than it answers.

Speaker:

But this is a good thing because

Speaker:

we are going to use this episode

Speaker:

as well as some of the other themes

Speaker:

that have been a constant in

Speaker:

our work here as a launch

Speaker:

point for a miniseries to start

Speaker:

this larger discussion.

Speaker:

Santiago and I talked to Alexander

Speaker:

Moldovan about his recent experience

Speaker:

studying social movements while in

Speaker:

Venezuela.

Speaker:

He shares some inspiring stories

Speaker:

of resistance and solidarity

Speaker:

as well as historical context,

Speaker:

to help put it all in perspective.

Speaker:

The North and South American

Speaker:

experiences certainly have

Speaker:

their differences.

Speaker:

We recognize that, but there are so

Speaker:

many parallels as well,

Speaker:

and even more lessons to be learned.

Speaker:

So we're excited at the idea of

Speaker:

exploring this further with you, the

Speaker:

audience.

Speaker:

If you'd like to support us as

Speaker:

we expand their content, our work,

Speaker:

please consider becoming a patron of

Speaker:

the show.

Speaker:

As we go through the interview,

Speaker:

you'll actually hear Santiago and I

Speaker:

come to the realization that our

Speaker:

work here drawing lessons from

Speaker:

the South American experience is far

Speaker:

from done.

Speaker:

So you can also help us by listening

Speaker:

in as we start this discussion

Speaker:

and share with us any themes

Speaker:

or questions you'd like us to

Speaker:

explore moving forward.

Speaker:

Here's our interview with Alex.

Speaker:

Okay, welcome.

Speaker:

Alex.

Speaker:

Can you please introduce yourself

Speaker:

for the audience?

Speaker:

Thank you. Thank you for having me.

Speaker:

Jessa and Santiago.

Speaker:

My name is Alexander Moldovan.

Speaker:

My pronouns are he him.

Speaker:

So I'm a Ph.D.

Speaker:

student at York University in the

Speaker:

Department of Politics.

Speaker:

I study kind of the link between

Speaker:

social movements, insecurity

Speaker:

and self-defense.

Speaker:

I've been looking at this for

Speaker:

several years.

Speaker:

I've just come back from fieldwork

Speaker:

in Venezuela, where

Speaker:

I had the chance really to learn

Speaker:

over the course of about two months

Speaker:

from movements kind of down there,

Speaker:

organizations and committees that

Speaker:

are formed to free and

Speaker:

imprisoned workers, farmers

Speaker:

who are trying to feed cities.

Speaker:

And one of the worst

Speaker:

kind of situations of food

Speaker:

insecurity in the hemisphere

Speaker:

and workers who have taken over

Speaker:

their factories.

Speaker:

Although like my background is

Speaker:

European, I was born and raised here

Speaker:

in Canada.

Speaker:

You know, I strive to learn from

Speaker:

from movements abroad.

Speaker:

And let's face it, I mean, Canadian

Speaker:

politics tends to be a bit boring.

Speaker:

We joke that it's cold up here and

Speaker:

nothing happens.

Speaker:

But, you

Speaker:

know, we've we've seen titanic

Speaker:

shifts in our political landscape,

Speaker:

you know, an almost attempted, I

Speaker:

guess, move to overthrow

Speaker:

the governments and earlier this

Speaker:

year that we're hearing the inquiry

Speaker:

about very recently.

Speaker:

So there's there's certain things

Speaker:

that I feel that we can definitely

Speaker:

learn from the Venezuelan

Speaker:

experience.

Speaker:

Pushing back against the far right.

Speaker:

That's definitely a useful tool.

Speaker:

And it's

Speaker:

what you said is kind of in part why

Speaker:

we called you on to blueprints

Speaker:

when you mentioned that you had been

Speaker:

studying social movements

Speaker:

in South America.

Speaker:

It seemed like a perfect time to

Speaker:

talk about it because a lot of our

Speaker:

episodes have been with

Speaker:

the frustration in Canadian

Speaker:

politics, the stagnation

Speaker:

on the left.

Speaker:

You're talking about movements on

Speaker:

the right. You know, that's not much

Speaker:

to get excited about.

Speaker:

But I understand what you're you're

Speaker:

talking about, like a need for

Speaker:

for mobilization.

Speaker:

But hopefully through this

Speaker:

discussion, I'm hoping.

Speaker:

To learn a lot because

Speaker:

when we were talking to Dimitri

Speaker:

LASCARIS. Right, Santiago's here

Speaker:

with us today because

Speaker:

he's got a lot of value to add

Speaker:

to this conversation as well.

Speaker:

So, yeah, I'm hoping to soak up

Speaker:

a lot of knowledge for you from

Speaker:

the both of you,

Speaker:

but also as a broader

Speaker:

movement here in Canadian activism

Speaker:

on any parallels

Speaker:

that you could draw or

Speaker:

lessons that we can learn

Speaker:

as activists on how to

Speaker:

make way to use social movements

Speaker:

to make way for actual progressive

Speaker:

government.

Speaker:

Because I think a lot of people

Speaker:

right now are at a loss.

Speaker:

Without a political home, we've

Speaker:

talked about this a lot on

Speaker:

blueprints and our encouragement has

Speaker:

for folks to take up activism

Speaker:

and to do mutual aid

Speaker:

and things in their community to

Speaker:

help push their neighbors left, you

Speaker:

know, to kind of put it roughly.

Speaker:

But we're not there yet.

Speaker:

Right. We're definitely not there

Speaker:

yet. I don't feel like we could

Speaker:

activate civil society in

Speaker:

the same way in South America.

Speaker:

But maybe maybe

Speaker:

you're going to give us a little bit

Speaker:

of hope there, Alex, because you

Speaker:

sounded a little hopeful there in

Speaker:

your intro.

Speaker:

Santiago, what do you hope to get

Speaker:

out of this conversation?

Speaker:

Well, for me, the way

Speaker:

I see it right now,

Speaker:

the whole world,

Speaker:

you're seeing a push to the right.

Speaker:

You know, you're seeing far

Speaker:

right movements grow in Canada,

Speaker:

the United States, Italy elected a

Speaker:

fascist government.

Speaker:

You have all

Speaker:

over Europe. The far right is

Speaker:

gaining more and more traction.

Speaker:

Really, there's not been a lot

Speaker:

of victories for the left.

Speaker:

And then I look at Latin America

Speaker:

and I see

Speaker:

the opposite story.

Speaker:

Right? We're living pink tide

Speaker:

part two. You know, a country

Speaker:

like Colombia, my home country where

Speaker:

I was born, which had never

Speaker:

elected anybody even remotely

Speaker:

close to being a leftist

Speaker:

that had been one of the strongest

Speaker:

allies of the United States in Latin

Speaker:

America.

Speaker:

That has,

Speaker:

to this day, the most U.S.

Speaker:

bases in the continent.

Speaker:

That has

Speaker:

been a brutally violent

Speaker:

place for leftists to

Speaker:

organize, elected

Speaker:

its first leftist president.

Speaker:

That is a strong

Speaker:

contrast to what we're seeing here.

Speaker:

And I guess for me,

Speaker:

being having lived in Canada

Speaker:

so long now and doing all of

Speaker:

my activism in Canada,

Speaker:

I want to figure out, you know, what

Speaker:

is it that they're doing right

Speaker:

there? What is it?

Speaker:

How are these movements being formed

Speaker:

when so many of us are talking, for

Speaker:

example, about writing off electoral

Speaker:

ism here, about exploring avenues

Speaker:

outside of electoral ism?

Speaker:

How is it that they're finding

Speaker:

victories through electoral ism?

Speaker:

How is it that they're finding

Speaker:

victories outside of it as well?

Speaker:

Because there's a lot of organizing

Speaker:

going on outside of that.

Speaker:

I don't necessarily have the

Speaker:

answers, but and I don't even know

Speaker:

if we can even.

Speaker:

Maybe Alex has all the answers about

Speaker:

why we brought them here.

Speaker:

Oh, God, no.

Speaker:

No pressure.

Speaker:

But that is a conversation I think,

Speaker:

that we have to start having.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And it's worth learning because, I

Speaker:

mean, they're doing something.

Speaker:

You know, something's going well.

Speaker:

No, certainly.

Speaker:

I mean, like, when you look here,

Speaker:

there's a huge and wide disconnect

Speaker:

between what movements are doing

Speaker:

and then what the electoral vehicle

Speaker:

of the left kind of says and

Speaker:

wants to even do.

Speaker:

It almost seems like the NDP just

Speaker:

doesn't want to take power, doesn't

Speaker:

want to have power in its hands.

Speaker:

But we understand that this is this

Speaker:

is fundamentally important.

Speaker:

And we could actually bring about,

Speaker:

like, positive social change

Speaker:

and make this this country,

Speaker:

you know, govern for

Speaker:

working people instead of on their

Speaker:

backs. Right.

Speaker:

But I think just to touch upon

Speaker:

what we were talking about in

Speaker:

Colombia, we can't look

Speaker:

at Petro's election

Speaker:

and this kind of this the sweep of

Speaker:

left in Latin America without the

Speaker:

movements of

Speaker:

a year prior to the election, there

Speaker:

was this national strike that really

Speaker:

energized a lot of poor working

Speaker:

class and young Colombians and got

Speaker:

them involved in real social

Speaker:

struggle like people are.

Speaker:

We're fighting police officers, riot

Speaker:

police in the streets.

Speaker:

And it was quite widespread

Speaker:

in multiple cities.

Speaker:

People were actually fighting back

Speaker:

against COVID lockdowns

Speaker:

and against wage suppression, things

Speaker:

like this.

Speaker:

So we need to be able to actually

Speaker:

tap into these movements, to be able

Speaker:

to elect

Speaker:

people like Pedro,

Speaker:

at least here in Canada.

Speaker:

You know, we can draw some sort of

Speaker:

parallel to that.

Speaker:

But contextually, I really want to

Speaker:

say Venezuela is very

Speaker:

different from Colombia and from

Speaker:

Chile and even from Mexico

Speaker:

since 2014 with I guess

Speaker:

with the death of Chavez and the

Speaker:

drastic decline in the price of oil

Speaker:

and, you know, a very coordinated

Speaker:

campaign of sanctions from

Speaker:

the US, the EU and Canada,

Speaker:

the country is very much suffering.

Speaker:

Some of the stories that people were

Speaker:

telling me or like, you know, for

Speaker:

for several for several months, we

Speaker:

could only buy like things that were

Speaker:

produced here. So like coffee,

Speaker:

mangos and maybe rubber,

Speaker:

they couldn't imports, commodities,

Speaker:

basic things to kind of get by.

Speaker:

Some refugee agencies estimate

Speaker:

the number of Venezuelans who have

Speaker:

left to be somewhere between 5

Speaker:

to 7 million.

Speaker:

And that's that's a lot of people.

Speaker:

This isn't like just the rich

Speaker:

and, you know, white collar

Speaker:

professionals fleeing the country.

Speaker:

This is people from very poor

Speaker:

neighborhoods saying, I can't make a

Speaker:

living here and I have to leave

Speaker:

to be able to find a job and support

Speaker:

my family.

Speaker:

And it's to some degree, it's it's

Speaker:

kind of ironic, like the federal

Speaker:

government has kind of really lasted

Speaker:

all these sanctions, like the Lima

Speaker:

Group, which is an organization that

Speaker:

that Canada has an informal

Speaker:

organization of states in the

Speaker:

Western Hemisphere

Speaker:

was formed right before this thing

Speaker:

tied part to with when all these

Speaker:

right wing governments were were

Speaker:

running countries from, you know,

Speaker:

Brazil, Colombia and Mexico.

Speaker:

And they started to bring together

Speaker:

condemnation.

Speaker:

So forwarding

Speaker:

cases to the International Criminal

Speaker:

Court.

Speaker:

So a case against Venezuela, Canada

Speaker:

is a signatory to this.

Speaker:

They tried to adopt diplomatic

Speaker:

pressure and economic

Speaker:

pressure, of course, with sanctions.

Speaker:

Today, the Lima Group really doesn't

Speaker:

function anymore.

Speaker:

Other Latin American countries that

Speaker:

signed on now have left this

Speaker:

president that really have no

Speaker:

concern for putting sanctions

Speaker:

on Maduro.

Speaker:

So, you know, while the government

Speaker:

has very much kind of

Speaker:

survives in a very,

Speaker:

you know, dire economic state,

Speaker:

it has this kind of wherewithal and

Speaker:

tenacity, but it's

Speaker:

also turned to some degree very,

Speaker:

very repressive against working

Speaker:

people, like when

Speaker:

during the national strike,

Speaker:

people were comparing, like the

Speaker:

repression the military in Colombia

Speaker:

was using to the

Speaker:

like in Venezuela, it's called the

Speaker:

operation Operation Liberate

Speaker:

the People of Peace.

Speaker:

And these are these are massive

Speaker:

human rights infringements where a

Speaker:

militarized riot police would enter

Speaker:

poor neighborhoods and just kind of

Speaker:

spray bullets everywhere

Speaker:

they were. They would kill you,

Speaker:

would plant guns on their bodies,

Speaker:

very dirty stuff.

Speaker:

And, you know, the government came

Speaker:

out, I think, in 2019

Speaker:

saying the policies were a mistake

Speaker:

that we've killed up to and they

Speaker:

estimate 7000 people.

Speaker:

So the situation I saw in Venezuela

Speaker:

was it

Speaker:

is hard to compare to

Speaker:

another country in Latin America,

Speaker:

even to try to compare to a country

Speaker:

that's not in a state of war.

Speaker:

And to be honest, just the level of

Speaker:

of the poverty.

Speaker:

But, you know, fixing that context,

Speaker:

I visited in spring

Speaker:

2022, and this was the first

Speaker:

year of like positive growth

Speaker:

that Venezuelans have seen since

Speaker:

2014.

Speaker:

So I guess the short lesson

Speaker:

here, the quick lesson I want to get

Speaker:

out is when you elect a leftist

Speaker:

government, you have to be willing

Speaker:

to fight because there will be

Speaker:

pressure on on the government,

Speaker:

on the social movements, on the

Speaker:

people that actually benefit from

Speaker:

government policies.

Speaker:

And it's really Venezuela has been

Speaker:

punished for for daring to stand up.

Speaker:

So how are social movements

Speaker:

responding to these

Speaker:

conditions?

Speaker:

Because when I think of South

Speaker:

American social movements, I think

Speaker:

of them, I guess was.

Speaker:

Any country

Speaker:

being either on the offense or

Speaker:

on the defense.

Speaker:

And typically, when you're

Speaker:

successful in electing

Speaker:

a progressive government,

Speaker:

you can start to refocus

Speaker:

your energies rather than

Speaker:

constantly fighting back.

Speaker:

But this seems to be a very unique

Speaker:

situation in Venezuela where.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

How are they responding?

Speaker:

So, no, that's a great question.

Speaker:

I think the the one of the

Speaker:

like one of the organizations

Speaker:

that I spoke to

Speaker:

that actually has a lot of relevance

Speaker:

for for what we see here in Canada,

Speaker:

especially with like the

Speaker:

industrialization.

Speaker:

You know, you see it in Hamilton,

Speaker:

you see it in small towns all around

Speaker:

Ontario. Just the town

Speaker:

factory leaves

Speaker:

and gets converted into a bunch of

Speaker:

call centers.

Speaker:

And people have to kind of grapple

Speaker:

with this this change into the

Speaker:

service sector.

Speaker:

I visited a city called Frederick

Speaker:

Does, and it's in both of our states

Speaker:

very, very much in the interior of

Speaker:

the country, in the Amazon.

Speaker:

And the city was designed in the

Speaker:

fifties to export raw materials

Speaker:

with light processing and send it

Speaker:

out to the world market.

Speaker:

So it's one of the most factory

Speaker:

dense parts of the country country.

Speaker:

But during the crisis,

Speaker:

a series of factory factory owners

Speaker:

would would just abandon their

Speaker:

plants.

Speaker:

Would seek to kind of strip the

Speaker:

plants of their like machines

Speaker:

and sell it for parts, whatever they

Speaker:

had. And this isn't in part

Speaker:

due to government policy, like

Speaker:

the government was trying to

Speaker:

institute wage reforms,

Speaker:

like increase the minimum wage,

Speaker:

have longer times for poor parental

Speaker:

leaves, basic things like this.

Speaker:

The government attempted to pass

Speaker:

some of these wage reforms during

Speaker:

like in the middle of this crisis.

Speaker:

And at that point, a few of the

Speaker:

bosses tried to leave.

Speaker:

Now, workers themselves

Speaker:

actually ended up blockading their

Speaker:

factories.

Speaker:

So there's this one great piece

Speaker:

on Venezuela analysis.

Speaker:

I met some of these workers, but

Speaker:

Sarah Pascall and Martina and Chris

Speaker:

Gilbert's two

Speaker:

contributors to Venezuela analysis

Speaker:

professors at

Speaker:

the Boulevard University in Caracas

Speaker:

and sat down and interviewed these

Speaker:

workers and talked to them about

Speaker:

their first experiences,

Speaker:

kind of with these like

Speaker:

rapid changes to the standard of

Speaker:

living and the prospect of the boss

Speaker:

leaving the plant.

Speaker:

And these workers said, you know, at

Speaker:

first we tried to form a union.

Speaker:

We tried to unionize and

Speaker:

actually kind of just institute wage

Speaker:

demands.

Speaker:

But then when we saw the boss was

Speaker:

actually trying to sell the

Speaker:

the factory for scraps, the factory

Speaker:

we've worked out for 40, 50

Speaker:

years, some of us, we blockaded

Speaker:

the factory and we stopped the

Speaker:

movement out of of goods.

Speaker:

And they did this in in Dhaka,

Speaker:

like a steel production plant that

Speaker:

services like the oil

Speaker:

industry.

Speaker:

They they held the perimeter

Speaker:

for two years and having

Speaker:

24 hour watches, they slept

Speaker:

in the bushes. They had iguanas.

Speaker:

Some of their their members

Speaker:

went out and got jobs in other

Speaker:

plants so they could still fund the

Speaker:

blockade of this plant.

Speaker:

And after about two years,

Speaker:

they applied to have it

Speaker:

expropriated.

Speaker:

This didn't work.

Speaker:

The government was really not

Speaker:

willing to expropriate the plants.

Speaker:

So they have a very different

Speaker:

set of property laws than than we

Speaker:

have in Canada.

Speaker:

But they ended up applying

Speaker:

for a specific title for the factory

Speaker:

to be a social property enterprise,

Speaker:

and it allowed the workers to

Speaker:

form a mixed commission with the

Speaker:

boss. So there would be two

Speaker:

representatives from the workers and

Speaker:

one from the boss, and they would

Speaker:

run the plants.

Speaker:

Now, in the case of India worker,

Speaker:

the bosses didn't want to

Speaker:

participate.

Speaker:

So the governments, according to the

Speaker:

law, gave the third position to the

Speaker:

workers. So the workers elected

Speaker:

their own managers and restarted

Speaker:

production themselves, and

Speaker:

they're actually still operating

Speaker:

today. So I think they seized the

Speaker:

plant finally in 2019,

Speaker:

and they're fulfilling service

Speaker:

contracts and they're going forward

Speaker:

now. Workers from like and this is

Speaker:

like I've been to picket lines in

Speaker:

Canada where this has happened,

Speaker:

where the bosses removed

Speaker:

the machinery. This happened at GM

Speaker:

and Oshawa.

Speaker:

There's US steel plants in Hamilton

Speaker:

that have been on strike like this

Speaker:

for almost a decade.

Speaker:

Really.

Speaker:

So I think that's a core lesson

Speaker:

here. Like we actually like it for

Speaker:

taking industrial action.

Speaker:

We have to get to the point of,

Speaker:

okay, we can't let the boss take

Speaker:

away the means of production from

Speaker:

the factories themselves or else

Speaker:

we're going to be guaranteed out of

Speaker:

jobs. They're not going to bring

Speaker:

this stuff back.

Speaker:

That's just the obvious truth.

Speaker:

And in this case of in Endora,

Speaker:

there were they were very aware of

Speaker:

this. But these workers went on

Speaker:

to join up with two other

Speaker:

occupied factories.

Speaker:

One is called there is so it's a

Speaker:

factory seized from a French

Speaker:

conglomerate.

Speaker:

And

Speaker:

they they with these factories,

Speaker:

they formed an organization called

Speaker:

the Productive Workers Army.

Speaker:

And it's a very new organization.

Speaker:

And they go around to different

Speaker:

social movements and

Speaker:

what we call communes in Venezuela,

Speaker:

other kind of collective

Speaker:

organizations that kind of

Speaker:

have their own democratic

Speaker:

structures, have assemblies,

Speaker:

and they actually control

Speaker:

production.

Speaker:

A lot of communes are based in like

Speaker:

the countryside.

Speaker:

So I'm based in small towns and

Speaker:

more or less village communities.

Speaker:

So they go to these communes

Speaker:

and they actually build infrastructure

Speaker:

for them to

Speaker:

be able to like produce goods.

Speaker:

So like coffee

Speaker:

grinding machines for, for communal

Speaker:

grows, working with in

Speaker:

the coffee sector, for instance,

Speaker:

which I tend to rent

Speaker:

as my academic way.

Speaker:

I'm sitting here wondering what the

Speaker:

response would be should

Speaker:

that have been tried at the GM

Speaker:

plant?

Speaker:

And I know you talked about like

Speaker:

property laws being different,

Speaker:

but I can only imagine

Speaker:

that would not last two years.

Speaker:

Like we would see police

Speaker:

intervention.

Speaker:

And I'm just so used to

Speaker:

blockades and movements being

Speaker:

thwarted by injunctions,

Speaker:

simple injunctions.

Speaker:

So.

Speaker:

How do we get from that

Speaker:

where we are now to that far more

Speaker:

militant approach to.

Speaker:

Individual workplaces.

Speaker:

And to be clear, they were

Speaker:

non-unionized.

Speaker:

They it was a it was an interesting

Speaker:

situation. They had a union, but it

Speaker:

was more of a yellow union.

Speaker:

So it was really in the pocket of

Speaker:

management. And they really felt

Speaker:

that, you know, the state and the

Speaker:

bosses were kind of working against

Speaker:

them in that respect.

Speaker:

Like their union officials

Speaker:

would really kind of have these

Speaker:

backdoor meetings with with the

Speaker:

employer.

Speaker:

So they were trying to actually

Speaker:

escape the one union they had

Speaker:

in in Dwarka and move

Speaker:

into a more autonomous union where

Speaker:

they had more control of the

Speaker:

situation.

Speaker:

But I think that.

Speaker:

That's a whole other conversation as

Speaker:

well. Right, because a lot of.

Speaker:

I'm trying to simplify it a little

Speaker:

because the the politics

Speaker:

gets a little thick or can get a

Speaker:

little thick and.

Speaker:

Because yeah. Just opens up all

Speaker:

these other questions that I have

Speaker:

to our labor movement and

Speaker:

alternatives because quite often

Speaker:

folks here use the

Speaker:

traditional avenues, right?

Speaker:

Get elected a delegate

Speaker:

run for office, take over

Speaker:

the union, you know, or

Speaker:

mobilize the rank and file to

Speaker:

do something similar, like put

Speaker:

pressure through those same simple

Speaker:

systems.

Speaker:

But what you're describing is,

Speaker:

again, just so unique to what

Speaker:

I thought was possible, I guess

Speaker:

I'm so stuck in in

Speaker:

this kind of Canadian perspective,

Speaker:

I think.

Speaker:

Santiago, like, what do you feel?

Speaker:

Yeah, just thinking.

Speaker:

Like, I'm also contrasting

Speaker:

with how militant

Speaker:

unions across Latin America

Speaker:

have played such an influential

Speaker:

role.

Speaker:

Like the national thing I started

Speaker:

thinking about was, you know,

Speaker:

in in Bolivia

Speaker:

after

Speaker:

the coup against Evo Morales,

Speaker:

it was the unions

Speaker:

that led to the rebuilding

Speaker:

of the movement that then

Speaker:

got the Movimiento

Speaker:

Socialism Party elected

Speaker:

again afterwards and how involved

Speaker:

the unions were in resisting against

Speaker:

the authoritarian regime that had

Speaker:

been created. Right.

Speaker:

And this seems to be

Speaker:

something that's quite common across

Speaker:

Latin America, which is

Speaker:

that organized

Speaker:

militant labor is at the center

Speaker:

of so many struggles.

Speaker:

Though, certainly, I mean, like

Speaker:

this, cases in Argentina where

Speaker:

people were doing the exact same

Speaker:

thing that I saw in Venezuela,

Speaker:

seizing their factories, this is it.

Speaker:

Like, you know, in the early 2000s

Speaker:

with the really like

Speaker:

frontal attacks of neoliberalism

Speaker:

against, you know, what was barely a

Speaker:

welfare state in Argentina.

Speaker:

But I think like one of the some

Speaker:

of the deficiencies we have, I mean,

Speaker:

like I guess to contextualize our

Speaker:

experience, it's even a little more

Speaker:

there's a very healthy skepticism

Speaker:

among working class people of of

Speaker:

trade union leadership and political

Speaker:

leadership.

Speaker:

And I think that's when we buy into

Speaker:

like, oh, yeah, let's do the

Speaker:

delegate thing. And then we actually

Speaker:

see from being a delegates the

Speaker:

limits of what you can do.

Speaker:

I think the next step and what

Speaker:

I saw with what they were doing

Speaker:

was screw, screw this

Speaker:

apparatus that you have that I can't

Speaker:

actually do anything positive for

Speaker:

people and I'm going to try to do

Speaker:

my own thing.

Speaker:

And in their case, they.

Speaker:

Our own thing.

Speaker:

Our own thing.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

They were trying to do it, you know,

Speaker:

our own thing.

Speaker:

But you know, there are difficulties

Speaker:

and I guess to contextualize this a

Speaker:

bit more like in Puerto,

Speaker:

it does in 2000.

Speaker:

Since the beginning of the

Speaker:

Bolivarian Movement has elected

Speaker:

Chavista representatives

Speaker:

to the National Assembly and also to

Speaker:

the state governor government.

Speaker:

Now, in 2008, there was a

Speaker:

huge kind of eruption of open

Speaker:

labor struggle.

Speaker:

And the governor of believe our

Speaker:

state had actually called me the

Speaker:

military, sort of the National

Speaker:

Guard, to contain the protesters

Speaker:

of workers.

Speaker:

Now, at a at the home of this

Speaker:

demonstration, where all the union

Speaker:

leaders, you know, same thing in

Speaker:

Canada, when you go to like a Labor

Speaker:

Day parade, the union leaderships at

Speaker:

the front, the National Guard,

Speaker:

opened fire with live ammunition

Speaker:

against these union leaders.

Speaker:

And this is like the Bolivarian

Speaker:

government doing it against, you

Speaker:

know, their their own kind of

Speaker:

people, or at least the Bolivarian

Speaker:

governor.

Speaker:

After this, immediately after Chavez

Speaker:

expropriated the steel sector and

Speaker:

brought it under state control, he

Speaker:

realized, he said, like, look, the

Speaker:

governor clearly screwed up and

Speaker:

pushing forward

Speaker:

with repression.

Speaker:

Chavez, in response to

Speaker:

kind of this violence against

Speaker:

working class people, kind of caved

Speaker:

in to their demands, immediately

Speaker:

expropriated the sector

Speaker:

and kind of.

Speaker:

It really allowed a more kind of

Speaker:

state centric planning

Speaker:

of production to kind of occur in

Speaker:

the steel sector at that point.

Speaker:

But the government has not always

Speaker:

been on the working classes side

Speaker:

and the union bureaucrats as well.

Speaker:

So there's an incredible

Speaker:

amount of understanding that, like

Speaker:

our organizations that we see right

Speaker:

now are not going to be there

Speaker:

without us and we can

Speaker:

easily brush them to the side if

Speaker:

need be.

Speaker:

Now, this is a little harder said

Speaker:

than done, kind

Speaker:

of given the context, but overall

Speaker:

there was the you know, despite

Speaker:

the amount of kind of like poverty,

Speaker:

the odds against them, like

Speaker:

the workers in these occupied

Speaker:

factories are blacklisted.

Speaker:

Like they have trouble finding

Speaker:

supplies. They have trouble finding

Speaker:

contracts because what kind

Speaker:

of capitalist wants to actually deal

Speaker:

with these kinds of plants?

Speaker:

Who who would really want to

Speaker:

encourage this? This is a very

Speaker:

dangerous example for other

Speaker:

people.

Speaker:

And it's it becomes embarrassing,

Speaker:

actually, to to the governments

Speaker:

in some instances,

Speaker:

to be to be precise,

Speaker:

the productive workers army was

Speaker:

asked to repair

Speaker:

kind of a gas like

Speaker:

a gas tank. And this is one of the

Speaker:

biggest

Speaker:

gas tanks, I guess, in the world and

Speaker:

one of the biggest refineries in

Speaker:

Venezuela.

Speaker:

And the manager of this specific

Speaker:

plant said it would it would cost

Speaker:

about, you know, 2.5 million

Speaker:

American to import kind of

Speaker:

a new tank.

Speaker:

They went in and fixed it for free.

Speaker:

They patched it up and

Speaker:

it completely worked.

Speaker:

So this is the example of like

Speaker:

working class dynamism and the

Speaker:

ability of like working people to

Speaker:

actually fix these problems.

Speaker:

Management on one hand, was was

Speaker:

willing to write off a $2

Speaker:

million check.

Speaker:

Despite the extremely hard

Speaker:

circumstances the country is facing

Speaker:

and through solidarity and

Speaker:

collective action, these workers

Speaker:

managed to come together and

Speaker:

and just fix the key industry

Speaker:

in the country.

Speaker:

And I've actually seen pictures of

Speaker:

this battle, and it's the most Latin

Speaker:

American thing ever.

Speaker:

There's these engineers working on

Speaker:

and stuff and there's a guy with a

Speaker:

cuatro just playing guitar to

Speaker:

like amp up the mood of of

Speaker:

the people there to, you know, other

Speaker:

work and just to get them energized.

Speaker:

See, I don't know if I've worked in

Speaker:

really bad places, but this

Speaker:

is a unique camaraderie

Speaker:

that seems to exist

Speaker:

naturally, just the way

Speaker:

folks unite beside

Speaker:

one another in the workplace.

Speaker:

Like, whereas that doesn't always

Speaker:

happen here, you know, even

Speaker:

in a unionized workplace,

Speaker:

but also that sense of ownership

Speaker:

over the means of production.

Speaker:

Like, almost like they know they

Speaker:

really own it or should own it

Speaker:

and are incensed at the idea

Speaker:

that it would go to waste, that it

Speaker:

would be sold off.

Speaker:

And I think

Speaker:

that's where we really lack

Speaker:

and that's unfathomable

Speaker:

to us.

Speaker:

Most workers here, you know, that's

Speaker:

the boss, is he?

Speaker:

That's company property.

Speaker:

I mean, even even the stuff

Speaker:

we take home is like that's theirs,

Speaker:

even though we're the only ones that

Speaker:

work on it and it's, it's how we do.

Speaker:

But that seems very unique.

Speaker:

And even as you describe the

Speaker:

music that goes alongside of it.

Speaker:

Not to say we don't sing on our

Speaker:

picket lines, but it just seems

Speaker:

much more familial than

Speaker:

the workplaces that that I've

Speaker:

been.

Speaker:

I don't know, you guys work anywhere

Speaker:

like that where you're just like,

Speaker:

that's it, we're not going

Speaker:

to take this anymore.

Speaker:

And I mean, I can tell you, like as

Speaker:

a musician, that people look at me

Speaker:

like I'm crazy.

Speaker:

If I start playing music in the

Speaker:

workplace.

Speaker:

Maybe they're remembering Santiago.

Speaker:

During during election night,

Speaker:

I brought my flute to

Speaker:

the newsroom because I'm a

Speaker:

journalism student, and this

Speaker:

was like the most normal thing in my

Speaker:

head. And everybody looked at

Speaker:

me like I was insane

Speaker:

for sure.

Speaker:

But honestly, like,

Speaker:

we need to bring back

Speaker:

working music, you know, and that

Speaker:

that is the cultural stuff.

Speaker:

And I talk about that a lot too.

Speaker:

That like and that's

Speaker:

what.

Speaker:

I don't mean to get on a bit of a

Speaker:

tenure here, but that is a big part

Speaker:

of like building.

Speaker:

Movement is also building like

Speaker:

community and to build community.

Speaker:

Culture is an element of that.

Speaker:

And art and music and

Speaker:

dancing and like these things

Speaker:

go is a part of that.

Speaker:

And I feel like sometimes we forget

Speaker:

about that. And you just reminded me

Speaker:

about that because, you know, like

Speaker:

that is that is a very Latino

Speaker:

thing, right? Like, yeah,

Speaker:

I can picture that in my head

Speaker:

already. And again, that's amazing.

Speaker:

But like you said, like culture is

Speaker:

like the soul of the comments, you

Speaker:

know what I mean? It's this thing

Speaker:

that could just very easily unite

Speaker:

us all.

Speaker:

And I mean, like, I've worked in

Speaker:

restaurants for much of my life and

Speaker:

when like a catchy song kind of

Speaker:

starts playing and like, we're all

Speaker:

in the back, the coworkers, the

Speaker:

chefs will start singing along.

Speaker:

And, you know, I've seen that kind

Speaker:

of smile, that warm feeling you get,

Speaker:

but still, like, you know, it's it's

Speaker:

not the same kind of militancy.

Speaker:

It's not the same willingness to

Speaker:

sacrifice, like

Speaker:

when when Cuba had this, you know,

Speaker:

almost strike.

Speaker:

You know, I was I was thinking, you

Speaker:

know, is Fred Horne going to get put

Speaker:

in cuffs? Like what's what's going

Speaker:

to happen next? Right.

Speaker:

I wanted to see this.

Speaker:

I'm like, yeah, man. Like I didn't

Speaker:

pay my dues as a kid.

Speaker:

You ever for years you're standing

Speaker:

up for us and like, man, Fred Hung

Speaker:

like I was on strike with you.

Speaker:

Be three. No. Three. I work with

Speaker:

York. So we're the first union

Speaker:

that Doug Ford legislated back

Speaker:

to work. And I think we were the

Speaker:

first law he passed to legislate us

Speaker:

back to work.

Speaker:

And Fred Heineman, he gave a speech

Speaker:

when we were at Queen's Park.

Speaker:

And I'm like, yes, let's storm

Speaker:

this place and throw this guy.

Speaker:

Oh, it's like he just gets you

Speaker:

going.

Speaker:

But yeah, I really want to see that

Speaker:

from our union leaders in this

Speaker:

country. Like go to jail.

Speaker:

Really? Like fight for us,

Speaker:

fight, fight for our right for wage

Speaker:

increases. Fight for us to to be

Speaker:

able to live with dignity.

Speaker:

There's not enough of these people

Speaker:

in the movements or the people

Speaker:

who are in there are extremely

Speaker:

comfortable.

Speaker:

No. Yeah, I agree so strongly

Speaker:

with that and I know that's a

Speaker:

lot to ask, but

Speaker:

at the same time there's people who

Speaker:

are willing to make that sacrifice,

Speaker:

who are willing to put their

Speaker:

life on the line in that kind of

Speaker:

way. And I feel

Speaker:

like, yeah, like if

Speaker:

we're going to get anywhere, we're

Speaker:

going to have to be a little

Speaker:

uncomfortable sometimes.

Speaker:

And I feel like the second

Speaker:

things get uncomfortable in Canada

Speaker:

is when things fall

Speaker:

apart.

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

No, I mean, just as.

Speaker:

What do you think about this?

Speaker:

It just makes me think of how

Speaker:

Canadian politics and politicians

Speaker:

have been.

Speaker:

The sounds of a watered down

Speaker:

and where you

Speaker:

need that fiery, vibrant

Speaker:

militancy.

Speaker:

Like we're in a class war and we

Speaker:

really do lack somebody standing

Speaker:

up there telling us to take up

Speaker:

proverbial arms.

Speaker:

Aside from the music, like I think

Speaker:

we joked around about that.

Speaker:

But the more that we talk

Speaker:

about that, it's it is part

Speaker:

of that culture and that

Speaker:

black color that needs to

Speaker:

be part of any movement that

Speaker:

also makes it fun and emotional.

Speaker:

And it just seems to stand

Speaker:

in such contrast to what

Speaker:

we want or what the political

Speaker:

class here in Canada seem

Speaker:

to want. Right.

Speaker:

We've done a lot of discussions

Speaker:

about the NDP and

Speaker:

their desire to have candidates who

Speaker:

don't stir the pot, who don't use

Speaker:

inflammatory language.

Speaker:

And this seems to be quite

Speaker:

the opposite.

Speaker:

And I just I love how we're hitting

Speaker:

on all of these key things that are

Speaker:

missing but aren't

Speaker:

things that are out of our reach.

Speaker:

You know, what this just reminded me

Speaker:

of, too, was

Speaker:

I just remembered a speech

Speaker:

that Lula gave, and

Speaker:

I cannot remember exactly what he

Speaker:

said. But before he went to jail,

Speaker:

um, I remember

Speaker:

he gave this, this very iconic

Speaker:

speech, and he was inspiring

Speaker:

people, you know that.

Speaker:

They may be locking him up, but that

Speaker:

the movement like has to continue

Speaker:

that.

Speaker:

He was.

Speaker:

He turned himself in.

Speaker:

Like he was willing to go

Speaker:

to jail.

Speaker:

To keep everything alive, you know,

Speaker:

and.

Speaker:

That's I feel like that's exactly

Speaker:

kind of like what we're talking

Speaker:

about. And I just remember that

Speaker:

because that was such a powerful

Speaker:

moment and.

Speaker:

We don't see that here, you know?

Speaker:

No, definitely.

Speaker:

My main concern

Speaker:

when we talk about, you know, how we

Speaker:

can make our labor movement

Speaker:

a lot more militant or mimic

Speaker:

what we see in South America.

Speaker:

And I'd like to ask Alex

Speaker:

if you think that and I know not all

Speaker:

the countries in South America are

Speaker:

the same in the labor movements

Speaker:

within them are definitely not the

Speaker:

same. But typically social

Speaker:

movements are nonhierarchical

Speaker:

or the good ones are.

Speaker:

Right. And what we're aiming for is

Speaker:

a post neoliberal world.

Speaker:

But if we are using institutions

Speaker:

that are in itself colonial and.

Speaker:

Defer still to neoliberalism.

Speaker:

Are they actually

Speaker:

transforming?

Speaker:

Are we end?

Speaker:

Are is is South America

Speaker:

actually ending up

Speaker:

with the kind of progressive

Speaker:

governments that they need

Speaker:

versus ones

Speaker:

that are still somewhat tolerant to

Speaker:

resource extraction from?

Speaker:

External forces.

Speaker:

So.

Speaker:

That's why I'm looking to

Speaker:

the social movements specifically

Speaker:

on how they can maybe transform

Speaker:

something different or demand

Speaker:

something different too, in

Speaker:

the people they put in power.

Speaker:

They're responsible for putting in

Speaker:

power.

Speaker:

I think the question that

Speaker:

you bring up has

Speaker:

has definitely been thought about

Speaker:

and scholarly discussion with no

Speaker:

clear cut answer.

Speaker:

What?

Speaker:

Yeah. There's like there's Jeffrey

Speaker:

Webber, a professor at York,

Speaker:

wrote a book called

Speaker:

Think the Day After the Revolution

Speaker:

as more of the same or something to

Speaker:

this effect about the original

Speaker:

pink tide, saying like, you know, we

Speaker:

elected all these governments, but,

Speaker:

you know, inequality is still very

Speaker:

much entrenched.

Speaker:

We still have the ending

Speaker:

to resource extraction.

Speaker:

And there's still a lot of this in

Speaker:

Pink Tide v2.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Like Gabriel Bolick,

Speaker:

the guy in Chile, the president

Speaker:

of Chile is like a modest social

Speaker:

Democrat. Like this is like what

Speaker:

you would see in Chile is the the

Speaker:

best you could hope for from Jagmeet

Speaker:

Singh is like NDP

Speaker:

and it's still a high degree of

Speaker:

tolerance for for the multinational

Speaker:

mining companies

Speaker:

in Peru.

Speaker:

It's the same story.

Speaker:

And, you know, we shouldn't sanitize

Speaker:

the legacy of of the first pink

Speaker:

tide, but that's that's exactly

Speaker:

where the social movements come in.

Speaker:

It's to hold the feet to the fire,

Speaker:

to make sure that the promises of

Speaker:

these governments actually

Speaker:

gets kind of taken up where

Speaker:

where I kind of saw

Speaker:

like in Venezuela, we don't have

Speaker:

the exact same parallel with state

Speaker:

repression of the left as

Speaker:

they do there, or just, I guess

Speaker:

about anybody really,

Speaker:

just because the situation has been

Speaker:

so dire, like we're talking about

Speaker:

coup attempts, mercenary incursions

Speaker:

to overthrow the government.

Speaker:

Drone attacks on the president like

Speaker:

it's really bred a

Speaker:

high, high degree

Speaker:

of paranoia, to be honest, from

Speaker:

state leadership.

Speaker:

But, you know, even in the social

Speaker:

movements that have supported the

Speaker:

governments and

Speaker:

social movements that have just

Speaker:

really come from the base

Speaker:

of just regular rank and file

Speaker:

Chavistas have been able to kind of

Speaker:

emerge.

Speaker:

So another group that I spoke to

Speaker:

is called Pueblo El Pueblo.

Speaker:

And there's things transitions

Speaker:

a bit tricky can either mean like

Speaker:

people to people or town to town to

Speaker:

town they so

Speaker:

a bunch of are I guess organizers

Speaker:

again from Chavistas

Speaker:

realized that there was a serious

Speaker:

concern with getting food into

Speaker:

cities, that people were facing

Speaker:

acute hunger.

Speaker:

So they they went into small

Speaker:

communities and communes and

Speaker:

in the countryside

Speaker:

and began organizing kind of network

Speaker:

distribution of of food produced on

Speaker:

these kind of small per,

Speaker:

I guess more or less peasant or mom

Speaker:

and pop farm,

Speaker:

you know, sites of production

Speaker:

and getting their food out into the

Speaker:

cities. And I like when walking

Speaker:

around Caracas, you see these

Speaker:

markets of these these peasants

Speaker:

coming in and kind of

Speaker:

selling their goods at what they

Speaker:

call solidarity prices,

Speaker:

not government subsidized just

Speaker:

really what the

Speaker:

farmers could could barebones afford

Speaker:

to make ends meet selling it to to

Speaker:

really poor barrio dwellers and

Speaker:

urban slum dwellers rather.

Speaker:

But it's interesting, like when,

Speaker:

when I met some of these these

Speaker:

folks, I went to a place that

Speaker:

Chavez built called C

Speaker:

C without Kariba.

Speaker:

So not to go on a really long

Speaker:

tangents, but

Speaker:

a lot of poor in Latin America, a

Speaker:

lot of poor communities are built up

Speaker:

on hills, into mountains.

Speaker:

And this because of, you know,

Speaker:

ecological change and even

Speaker:

like regular seasonal like

Speaker:

rainstorms, it makes them

Speaker:

really susceptible to mudslides and

Speaker:

destruction.

Speaker:

So from like one day to the next,

Speaker:

like your house is gone, you don't

Speaker:

have insurance. It's not the same

Speaker:

kind of situation that we would

Speaker:

expect, like here with people facing

Speaker:

disaster.

Speaker:

So essentially, Chavez built victims

Speaker:

of these mudslides, their own

Speaker:

like little kind of town at the top

Speaker:

of this mountain

Speaker:

and going there is some of the most

Speaker:

breathtaking views I've ever seen in

Speaker:

my life. Just an amazingly

Speaker:

beautiful.

Speaker:

But they were actually supplying

Speaker:

food to the schools,

Speaker:

like directly giving it to, like,

Speaker:

principals.

Speaker:

So it's a little weird because like

Speaker:

I was there kind of like as this

Speaker:

researcher and like I was with some

Speaker:

of the more like administrative

Speaker:

staff for blah blah blah and

Speaker:

there was like one guy hauling all

Speaker:

this food and I'm like, Guys, come

Speaker:

on. I'm like, I can't, I can't

Speaker:

in good conscience, watch this one

Speaker:

guy lug around like a £60

Speaker:

bag of, like, corn.

Speaker:

So, you know, we all got our hands

Speaker:

dirty and kind of lifted food

Speaker:

into the school. And it was

Speaker:

it was it was wild to

Speaker:

see because like in their

Speaker:

constitution, children have

Speaker:

to be given food twice a day in

Speaker:

schools.

Speaker:

And the government, what they were

Speaker:

they were doing were importing food,

Speaker:

processed food, food, though it

Speaker:

wasn't actually like of nutritional

Speaker:

value.

Speaker:

And I mean, like I'm talking about

Speaker:

food in schools and like in the

Speaker:

United States, you know, they have

Speaker:

like lunch debt, you

Speaker:

know what I mean? Like.

Speaker:

Ridiculous concept that is just

Speaker:

it's terrible.

Speaker:

It's capitalistic and it's

Speaker:

parasitic.

Speaker:

When it comes to talking about food

Speaker:

in schools, we don't even have to

Speaker:

look anywhere.

Speaker:

We can look at Canada because this

Speaker:

is something I'm actually just

Speaker:

currently writing articles about,

Speaker:

which is the fact that Canada's

Speaker:

ranked 37th out of

Speaker:

40 something wealthy nations in

Speaker:

the world for childhood food

Speaker:

insecurity, where one third of

Speaker:

kids in Canada don't have

Speaker:

access to breakfast

Speaker:

due to food insecurity, where

Speaker:

something like it's over a

Speaker:

quarter, something like yeah,

Speaker:

something like a quarter of Bipoc

Speaker:

households are struggling with food

Speaker:

insecurity, something like

Speaker:

I think it's around a sixth of

Speaker:

infants struggle with food

Speaker:

insecurity, which is like.

Speaker:

Ridiculous number six or an infant.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's

Speaker:

yeah. Households with children

Speaker:

are twice as likely to struggle

Speaker:

with food insecurity. In Canada,

Speaker:

we're the only G7 nation without

Speaker:

a school breakfast program

Speaker:

which inspired, of course,

Speaker:

by the Black Panthers.

Speaker:

Shout out to the Black Panthers.

Speaker:

Yeah, we're the only one who doesn't

Speaker:

have that. So Canada is so woefully

Speaker:

behind in that and I just wanna

Speaker:

mention because there's that should

Speaker:

be incredibly radicalizing

Speaker:

for everybody because there's

Speaker:

absolutely nothing you can do to

Speaker:

blame a child for not being able

Speaker:

to have food and the impact that

Speaker:

that has on

Speaker:

increasing the cycle

Speaker:

of poverty because you know,

Speaker:

how does that affect their

Speaker:

education? How does that affect

Speaker:

their ability to learn to be

Speaker:

successful in school, to be able to

Speaker:

be what comes after school?

Speaker:

Right. And so, yeah, just I want

Speaker:

to throw that out there because it's

Speaker:

a huge issue in Canada and

Speaker:

it's good to see that there's

Speaker:

something being done about that

Speaker:

in Latin America, at least.

Speaker:

And frankly, that is

Speaker:

I have no idea how we don't have

Speaker:

a massive movement movement around

Speaker:

here because it's we're

Speaker:

at the bottom of the

Speaker:

of the list, essentially, in terms

Speaker:

of dealing with that.

Speaker:

We have like a weird like second

Speaker:

best is on like you know whatever

Speaker:

happens we point to the states and

Speaker:

it's a.

Speaker:

Weird sort of better than.

Speaker:

The school thing.

Speaker:

Yeah. And I just I don't get it.

Speaker:

It's like they're dead last and.

Speaker:

Well.

Speaker:

I think that leads me to my question

Speaker:

because the Americans like their

Speaker:

Constitution, is so rife with issues

Speaker:

and our charter

Speaker:

itself, you know, doesn't secure

Speaker:

economic rights.

Speaker:

So when you mentioned something like

Speaker:

lunch twice a day,

Speaker:

like something so very specific,

Speaker:

a collective responsibility,

Speaker:

one that makes sure people are fed.

Speaker:

I mean, that's completely lacking

Speaker:

from our idea of what governance

Speaker:

is for at the moment.

Speaker:

We talk about mutual aid a lot, but

Speaker:

and it's necessary.

Speaker:

People are hungry.

Speaker:

But that is a shift in ideology,

Speaker:

right? That's normalizing the idea

Speaker:

that we have to scrape what we can

Speaker:

and rather than doing it on the

Speaker:

larger scale that government

Speaker:

facilitates. So I wonder

Speaker:

if you think

Speaker:

it's like the chicken or the egg,

Speaker:

right? Is it in the Constitution

Speaker:

because it was an understood ideal,

Speaker:

a cultural understanding

Speaker:

or, you know, did they were

Speaker:

successful?

Speaker:

Chavez, you know,

Speaker:

put it in the constitution, I

Speaker:

assume, you

Speaker:

know, get a progressive government,

Speaker:

instill things in the Constitution

Speaker:

that start to ingrain it from there.

Speaker:

I ask because, you know, is our

Speaker:

energy,

Speaker:

should our energy be spent at any

Speaker:

some level petitioning

Speaker:

God petitions, petitioning

Speaker:

the government to.

Speaker:

Rewrite our charter and without

Speaker:

opening that whole debate on.

Speaker:

Is that possible?

Speaker:

Is is there value

Speaker:

in shifting the Constitution

Speaker:

or does it that have to happen at a

Speaker:

different level?

Speaker:

The contrast between how the

Speaker:

Canadian Constitution was adopted

Speaker:

and how, like the more recent Latin

Speaker:

American constitutions were adopted

Speaker:

is very stark.

Speaker:

Like we have just a bunch of elites

Speaker:

write our Constitution and submit

Speaker:

it through like an amendment

Speaker:

formula, like in

Speaker:

Chile. Most recently, I think they

Speaker:

had like an actual like, you know,

Speaker:

you vote for a,

Speaker:

a person to go to a constitutional

Speaker:

convention.

Speaker:

So you have like a democratic

Speaker:

process to bring community concerns.

Speaker:

And then, you know, unfortunately,

Speaker:

in Chile, the you know, they drafted

Speaker:

this constitution, they put it up

Speaker:

for referendum and it got defeated.

Speaker:

But, you know, I think

Speaker:

the point I guess I'm trying to make

Speaker:

is we have to work with what we

Speaker:

have.

Speaker:

And it's you know, I heard a lot

Speaker:

of like, you know, our glorious

Speaker:

Constitution, our great

Speaker:

constitutional rights when I was

Speaker:

in Venezuela from like militant

Speaker:

socialists. Right.

Speaker:

But then when I told them, like, oh,

Speaker:

you know, the Constitution says

Speaker:

private property rights, ours in

Speaker:

Canada doesn't.

Speaker:

People would look at me gobsmacked.

Speaker:

They're like, what do you mean?

Speaker:

Like you don't have guaranteed

Speaker:

constitutional private property

Speaker:

rights? And I'd say, Yeah, it's a

Speaker:

paradox. We have all these

Speaker:

mining companies that set up shop

Speaker:

here and commit atrocities

Speaker:

in sub-Saharan Africa, in Latin

Speaker:

America, but yet

Speaker:

their assets aren't constitutionally

Speaker:

protected.

Speaker:

Given this, you know, actually

Speaker:

legislating your way to like a more

Speaker:

socialist society is quite easy in

Speaker:

this country.

Speaker:

They're not it's not a

Speaker:

constitutional amendment

Speaker:

to to actually take like

Speaker:

Bell and Rogers and nationalize

Speaker:

them, for instance.

Speaker:

But it's a small change to the

Speaker:

Property Act.

Speaker:

It's a legislative change that could

Speaker:

be passed quite easily.

Speaker:

That's, again, when I'm with.

Speaker:

The right people in power.

Speaker:

Yeah, you have to want power.

Speaker:

We need leftists who want to

Speaker:

actually do good things with power.

Speaker:

And that's what we don't have.

Speaker:

Well, that's a whole other

Speaker:

discussion, I suppose.

Speaker:

We don't have leftists running any

Speaker:

parties at the moment, so

Speaker:

we are such a far step from

Speaker:

that because

Speaker:

one just needs to, you know, point

Speaker:

to B.C., where social movements

Speaker:

did play a part in getting the

Speaker:

NDP elected with hopes that

Speaker:

the they would be allies in the

Speaker:

environmentalist movement and

Speaker:

could enact some reforms that would

Speaker:

be lasting, you know, especially

Speaker:

when you get a majority government.

Speaker:

So that's you know, that's

Speaker:

clearly not our way just

Speaker:

yet.

Speaker:

I also think it's worth mentioning

Speaker:

that in

Speaker:

the vast majority of electoral

Speaker:

victories in Latin America, these

Speaker:

were new parties that were created

Speaker:

in recent history.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

I don't fully know

Speaker:

what the and I don't and not fully

Speaker:

I don't know what the answer is in

Speaker:

Canada, but I,

Speaker:

I just want to throw that out there

Speaker:

because, you know, the idea

Speaker:

of working outside of

Speaker:

the NDP is

Speaker:

met with a lot of

Speaker:

hesitancy.

Speaker:

And I understand where people

Speaker:

are coming from when it comes to the

Speaker:

ascendency. But it is worth noting

Speaker:

that in Latin America that's

Speaker:

exactly what people did.

Speaker:

They worked outside of the

Speaker:

traditional parties and they won

Speaker:

in that way.

Speaker:

And that's worth something.

Speaker:

Though certainly

Speaker:

it's there are limits to

Speaker:

our kind of parliamentary system in

Speaker:

terms of new parties coming in

Speaker:

like Dr. to historical in Colombia,

Speaker:

Petro's party is very new

Speaker:

and it's exactly what, you know,

Speaker:

kind of I think what you're referring

Speaker:

to.

Speaker:

But it's not difficult to navigate

Speaker:

when you have social democracy

Speaker:

that is just, you know, doesn't

Speaker:

mobilize purposefully

Speaker:

and then tries to talk about, you

Speaker:

know, what we are terms like

Speaker:

reflation and like home heating

Speaker:

bills for, you know, subsidies for

Speaker:

your landlord to kind of

Speaker:

take the sweat off your back

Speaker:

in Latin America.

Speaker:

There's there's a very much among

Speaker:

social movements.

Speaker:

I don't want to be so broad as to

Speaker:

say all of Latin America, but at

Speaker:

least kind of what I saw in in

Speaker:

certain parts of Venezuela, a

Speaker:

real kind of embracing of

Speaker:

we're going to come together and

Speaker:

converge to kind of do these

Speaker:

specific things.

Speaker:

And if, you know, our time is done,

Speaker:

our time is done, I'll move on to

Speaker:

the next kind of task to organize.

Speaker:

There's always something pressing.

Speaker:

I have the fortune of being in

Speaker:

a parish of Caracas called

Speaker:

the 23rd of January,

Speaker:

and the social movements there are

Speaker:

so strong that they actually have an

Speaker:

oral pact with the police

Speaker:

not to enter the community.

Speaker:

I saw one cop in this neighborhood

Speaker:

and this guy was in the subway

Speaker:

station and he was running to get

Speaker:

off the train to get into like a

Speaker:

staff entrance.

Speaker:

And he didn't want anybody to see

Speaker:

him.

Speaker:

Like you'd like you'd walk around

Speaker:

and you'd see like National

Speaker:

Guardsmen who are not police, the

Speaker:

army, but they'd be around without

Speaker:

without their weapons.

Speaker:

Now there's two there's

Speaker:

a lot of.

Speaker:

I guess the term is that we see a

Speaker:

lot of North American news about

Speaker:

Venezuela as colectivo.

Speaker:

And this is a very kind of fuzzy

Speaker:

term. Some collectives

Speaker:

act like, you know, pro-government

Speaker:

thugs

Speaker:

and not just against like, you know,

Speaker:

right wing insurrectionists against

Speaker:

like, you know, garbage workers

Speaker:

protesting the rights.

Speaker:

Some of these collectives will go in

Speaker:

and act as, you know, thugs or

Speaker:

security, but other ones

Speaker:

actually form form communes and try

Speaker:

to actually give back to their

Speaker:

community.

Speaker:

So this one that I saw, Alexis,

Speaker:

Vivian, they kind

Speaker:

of run security for like or

Speaker:

organize around 22 blocks in

Speaker:

the 23rd of January.

Speaker:

They know who gets in the

Speaker:

neighborhood. They have a CCTV

Speaker:

camera setup.

Speaker:

So it's kind of weird.

Speaker:

It's like an abolitionist politics,

Speaker:

but still like we're using the tools

Speaker:

of the oppressor to make sure that

Speaker:

people aren't dealing drugs in our

Speaker:

neighborhood. Like we could

Speaker:

actually, like, look around and see

Speaker:

strangers coming in.

Speaker:

They have a hotline, like a tip

Speaker:

line. So it very much works like

Speaker:

a911 call center, except

Speaker:

we got the police and they diffuse

Speaker:

the situation. If there's like a

Speaker:

drug deal going down, they kick the

Speaker:

drug dealer out of the area.

Speaker:

They've also done things like

Speaker:

like they run like their own kind of

Speaker:

garbage collection that they

Speaker:

organically use with like pigs.

Speaker:

So they get these, like, urban pigs

Speaker:

in this like area to eat

Speaker:

like garbage that the city won't

Speaker:

take.

Speaker:

They have like a swimming pool

Speaker:

that they filled up with fish and

Speaker:

they turn it into like a fish, like

Speaker:

an Olympic sized swimming pool, and

Speaker:

they turn it into like a fish farm

Speaker:

so that the community can have

Speaker:

access to the fish whenever they

Speaker:

wanted to.

Speaker:

This, like, sound like San Diego is

Speaker:

you're smiling like this sounds

Speaker:

crazy like thinking about this in

Speaker:

Canada, like, you know, and like

Speaker:

just turning a swimming pool into

Speaker:

this is just absurd.

Speaker:

But it's it's a reality.

Speaker:

Like, if you don't have access to

Speaker:

garbage or if you don't have access

Speaker:

to, like to to

Speaker:

these kinds of food, like, people

Speaker:

appreciate this, but it's that kind

Speaker:

of basic level of mutual aid that

Speaker:

that people are firmly kind of

Speaker:

aware of and behind.

Speaker:

I'm Kelly Santiago's

Speaker:

smiling because

Speaker:

he envisions the same here.

Speaker:

You know, I think you're you're

Speaker:

reminding him to of

Speaker:

what he'd like to see.

Speaker:

You know, he gave a shout out to the

Speaker:

Black Panthers earlier.

Speaker:

That's for, you know, a reason.

Speaker:

Right. Santiago, you know, like

Speaker:

these ideas seem to be like your I

Speaker:

see your brain just filling with

Speaker:

ideas in

Speaker:

terms of mutual aid and community

Speaker:

building.

Speaker:

Yeah. Like, if we wait

Speaker:

for a government

Speaker:

to come in and

Speaker:

help people, we're going to be

Speaker:

waiting entirely

Speaker:

too long and people are going to

Speaker:

continue suffering, you know?

Speaker:

Is this kind of, like, innovative,

Speaker:

community driven work that.

Speaker:

That we need to start seeing

Speaker:

more because like I said, like,

Speaker:

I think there's a misconception as

Speaker:

to how well off people are doing in

Speaker:

Canada.

Speaker:

There's a lot of people who are

Speaker:

living in in a real deep

Speaker:

poverty, a poverty

Speaker:

that is much more invisible

Speaker:

than even like, you know, like in

Speaker:

the United States is a lot of

Speaker:

poverty. That poverty is a lot more

Speaker:

visible. You know, you go to a lot

Speaker:

of places in the United States.

Speaker:

You can see the poverty, you can

Speaker:

feel the suffering.

Speaker:

I feel like people in Canada don't

Speaker:

realize that a

Speaker:

very similar situation is happening

Speaker:

here, but it's much more hidden

Speaker:

and.

Speaker:

And what do we do? We just accept

Speaker:

that that's the reality.

Speaker:

Until we can completely change

Speaker:

everything. No.

Speaker:

Like that's we're not going to

Speaker:

completely change everything

Speaker:

tomorrow. And people tomorrow are

Speaker:

going to be hungry.

Speaker:

You know, and I want to see,

Speaker:

you know, out of building that

Speaker:

kind of community driven solidarity.

Speaker:

That's where it starts.

Speaker:

You know, that's where the movement

Speaker:

should begin.

Speaker:

And not that.

Speaker:

That's that's very much my praxis.

Speaker:

I feel like all these stories that

Speaker:

Alex has are part

Speaker:

of the solution, which is glad I'm

Speaker:

I'm glad we're recording them and in

Speaker:

amplifying them because.

Speaker:

Yeah. Like, we can't just wait until

Speaker:

it gets so bad that we can't

Speaker:

envision anything else.

Speaker:

Like, we can draw from

Speaker:

these. And we don't often get to

Speaker:

hear stories of success from South

Speaker:

America.

Speaker:

Obviously, our our news is

Speaker:

completely Eurocentric and any

Speaker:

examples of real people power

Speaker:

does not make our airwaves,

Speaker:

especially these

Speaker:

really specific examples of

Speaker:

workplaces or communities that

Speaker:

you've been able to provide.

Speaker:

I think.

Speaker:

I think it would be great if people

Speaker:

could just hear more of these

Speaker:

and and envision

Speaker:

what's possible.

Speaker:

And I keep saying, like, oh, is it a

Speaker:

cultural thing?

Speaker:

And I think that's just an easy out.

Speaker:

You know, but there is a lot of

Speaker:

work to do in terms of what

Speaker:

people.

Speaker:

Envision how they see themselves

Speaker:

in terms of power structures and

Speaker:

abilities.

Speaker:

I wanted to pivot just before we run

Speaker:

out of time, because I think we

Speaker:

spent a lot of time talking

Speaker:

about social movements in South

Speaker:

American countries where.

Speaker:

They have friendly governments.

Speaker:

But before we started recording.

Speaker:

Well, friendlier governments,

Speaker:

because you've given us some

Speaker:

examples, you know, food

Speaker:

for thought there. Definitely.

Speaker:

But before we started recording,

Speaker:

Santiago was talking about

Speaker:

how difficult and dangerous

Speaker:

it is to be.

Speaker:

A proponent of the left in

Speaker:

South America.

Speaker:

And although Columbia was

Speaker:

successful,

Speaker:

there's still resistance in South

Speaker:

America. Surely

Speaker:

social movements that are in

Speaker:

the defensive position

Speaker:

I described earlier.

Speaker:

You know.

Speaker:

And just also building on

Speaker:

that. One thing that's important to

Speaker:

mention whenever you're talking

Speaker:

about Latin America is

Speaker:

U.S. imperialism and not

Speaker:

just U.S. imperialism.

Speaker:

Canadian imperialism to.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And the violence and the danger

Speaker:

that comes from that.

Speaker:

And that's a conversation we like.

Speaker:

I just want to bring that up that

Speaker:

right on top of that

Speaker:

because.

Speaker:

Yeah, like Alec talks about the role

Speaker:

of social movements in other

Speaker:

governments. It's like hold the feet

Speaker:

to the fire.

Speaker:

But how do they.

Speaker:

I'm in where I believe

Speaker:

we don't have the level of state of

Speaker:

oppression that's

Speaker:

comparable.

Speaker:

It still would be hostile to a lot

Speaker:

of these endeavors.

Speaker:

Right. You would face maybe

Speaker:

violent resistance even to

Speaker:

try to attempt some of the things

Speaker:

that Alex is talking about.

Speaker:

So and it kind of brings back to the

Speaker:

land back discussion where there's

Speaker:

this immense sense of courage,

Speaker:

despite the paranoia that might

Speaker:

exist, rightfully so.

Speaker:

The knowledge that in U.S.

Speaker:

imperialism is always looming

Speaker:

and other repercussions

Speaker:

of.

Speaker:

Not toeing the line of neoliberalism

Speaker:

embargos, but still

Speaker:

that that courage that exists

Speaker:

and that determination that these

Speaker:

movements.

Speaker:

Are responsible for these

Speaker:

turns in history, right,

Speaker:

where it wasn't always just

Speaker:

appealing to the government or

Speaker:

the Constitution, but actual

Speaker:

fights on their hand.

Speaker:

Can anybody lend some insight

Speaker:

as to.

Speaker:

So in like being a

Speaker:

left winger and Venezuela is

Speaker:

very different than that in

Speaker:

Colombia,

Speaker:

like, you know, just

Speaker:

just from my reading, not like my

Speaker:

lived experiences, people going

Speaker:

through like checkpoints of like a

Speaker:

U.S., I think they call it like

Speaker:

self-defense units,

Speaker:

which are like landlord backed

Speaker:

militia, as if they know you're a

Speaker:

leftist, like they'll execute you.

Speaker:

Right. Right there.

Speaker:

It's it's dangerous.

Speaker:

And these organizations were

Speaker:

backed by the presidency for the

Speaker:

past three, three or four

Speaker:

presidents, at least.

Speaker:

So it's it's quite, quite hard

Speaker:

in that context.

Speaker:

But sorry, go ahead.

Speaker:

No, even I was just thinking even

Speaker:

longer. Like that's been

Speaker:

100 years plus of

Speaker:

that kind of resistance.

Speaker:

Certainly in Venezuela, given

Speaker:

like the Bolivarian Revolution, a

Speaker:

lot of the like older people I would

Speaker:

talk to had like a, you know, for

Speaker:

memories of what it was like living

Speaker:

in the sixties, the seventies and

Speaker:

the eighties.

Speaker:

Remember the state repression and

Speaker:

they remember like, you know, their

Speaker:

neighbors disappearing after, you

Speaker:

know, you know, scattered

Speaker:

bombing like leftist propaganda on

Speaker:

campus or like

Speaker:

hiding a gun in their like house

Speaker:

for like a friend who was involved

Speaker:

in the insurgency, things

Speaker:

like this. But again, like not the

Speaker:

same kind of politics in the

Speaker:

same exact way.

Speaker:

But. On the role of.

Speaker:

Of US U.S.

Speaker:

imperialism and Canadian

Speaker:

imperialism. It's

Speaker:

I don't understand the Canadian

Speaker:

foreign policy anymore.

Speaker:

Like it literally doesn't make

Speaker:

sense. It's nobody else is

Speaker:

is hostile to this government or

Speaker:

these people anymore.

Speaker:

We're really telling in the U.S.

Speaker:

and we're even we're tail ending and

Speaker:

opposition like we're so involved

Speaker:

in this other nations democracy

Speaker:

that we're recognizing another

Speaker:

government that doesn't exist.

Speaker:

The government of Juan Guaido,

Speaker:

which officially and kind of the

Speaker:

Canadian like diplomatic

Speaker:

channels, they don't talk to Maduro.

Speaker:

There's no like embassy in Venezuela

Speaker:

anymore.

Speaker:

There's no communication,

Speaker:

like to get my visa to go into

Speaker:

Venezuela, to go to Mexico City.

Speaker:

Right. Like it's there's you know,

Speaker:

the government here needs to really

Speaker:

like end the hostility

Speaker:

against the Venezuelan government

Speaker:

because it only hurts the people

Speaker:

and it actually makes the society

Speaker:

more corrupt to get around

Speaker:

the blockade.

Speaker:

The government passed something

Speaker:

called the anti blockade law

Speaker:

and in this they said all private,

Speaker:

all procurement of government

Speaker:

contracts is to be conducted

Speaker:

secretly.

Speaker:

This is not transparent, but this is

Speaker:

because of the blockade.

Speaker:

This is literally because of one

Speaker:

incident, incident where they were

Speaker:

trying to sell oil to a refinery in

Speaker:

India.

Speaker:

The United States got wind of this

Speaker:

and then sent a message to

Speaker:

the owners of this refinery saying,

Speaker:

if you accept this shipment of

Speaker:

Venezuelan oil, we will blacklist

Speaker:

you from the American market.

Speaker:

We will no longer accept anything

Speaker:

that you produce in the United

Speaker:

States that for any company

Speaker:

is is suicide.

Speaker:

Right. So immediately they they you

Speaker:

know, they backed off and they did

Speaker:

the refinery refused to process

Speaker:

the Venezuelan oil.

Speaker:

So they passed this anti blockade

Speaker:

law.

Speaker:

And now, like, nobody nobody knows,

Speaker:

like even like government supporters

Speaker:

are like we have no idea what the

Speaker:

government's doing with the budget.

Speaker:

We have no idea who the government's

Speaker:

paying for what and how much.

Speaker:

And in this, if you think about it,

Speaker:

there's huge opportunities for graft

Speaker:

and corruption.

Speaker:

But and these are like the direct

Speaker:

effects of the sanctions to make

Speaker:

a democratic regime right.

Speaker:

To actually make it actually makes

Speaker:

the situation worse and unlivable,

Speaker:

not just on the population, but at

Speaker:

the level of government procurement

Speaker:

and finances.

Speaker:

And one can only imagine

Speaker:

these acts and

Speaker:

lack of transparency are just

Speaker:

going to be used to demonize

Speaker:

that government who are simply

Speaker:

acting in response.

Speaker:

But I guess we, we know that game

Speaker:

over and over.

Speaker:

Yeah. Oh, yeah.

Speaker:

Oh, it's, it's like you

Speaker:

create a situation in which the

Speaker:

government has to be secret and then

Speaker:

you call them corrupt.

Speaker:

Like, from our perspective, 100%.

Speaker:

But from the perspective of social

Speaker:

movement activists, it's

Speaker:

a blind that it's hard to get

Speaker:

around.

Speaker:

Right? It's like you want to keep

Speaker:

these people honest, but you don't

Speaker:

have the means to.

Speaker:

Right. So it's there's a element of

Speaker:

despair. I don't want to throw a

Speaker:

shred of hope, but,

Speaker:

you know, their situation does come

Speaker:

with these these nuances that are

Speaker:

that are so difficult.

Speaker:

It does make me think

Speaker:

and I've been thinking about this a

Speaker:

lot lately, which is now

Speaker:

that there there is

Speaker:

such a widespread movement around

Speaker:

Latin America.

Speaker:

You know, historically, there has

Speaker:

been such a dependance economically

Speaker:

on the United States,

Speaker:

you know, in the West in general.

Speaker:

But Latin America is a very

Speaker:

it is a very rich region

Speaker:

in terms of rich and resource

Speaker:

rich. And the land

Speaker:

is very.

Speaker:

Fertile.

Speaker:

You know.

Speaker:

For me I would like to see

Speaker:

going forward is more.

Speaker:

Unity within Latin America

Speaker:

and working together, these

Speaker:

governments working together

Speaker:

so that they don't have to rely as

Speaker:

much on the U.S., on the United

Speaker:

States.

Speaker:

And I have heard, you know,

Speaker:

Lula was starting to say something

Speaker:

about maybe a common currency.

Speaker:

I know that's been tried.

Speaker:

Something like that in the past.

Speaker:

It hasn't necessarily

Speaker:

taken off yet.

Speaker:

But for all of South America.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Some I think what they're looking at

Speaker:

as they look at the European Union

Speaker:

and they say, you know, something

Speaker:

similar to that.

Speaker:

And I don't know.

Speaker:

But I do think that, like, there

Speaker:

needs to be something.

Speaker:

So that when when it comes to like

Speaker:

these blockades, you know something

Speaker:

that Venezuela but also Cuba

Speaker:

has endured for

Speaker:

such a long time

Speaker:

that those would lose the

Speaker:

power that they have.

Speaker:

If the region learned

Speaker:

to work together?

Speaker:

I don't know.

Speaker:

Alex would.

Speaker:

Know. There's so much more strength.

Speaker:

You know, if we if we put, like,

Speaker:

petty provincialism aside.

Speaker:

Right. And actually see, like,

Speaker:

continental unity.

Speaker:

Lula's proposal,

Speaker:

I think it was in the run up to the

Speaker:

elections, it was one of these very

Speaker:

hopeful, kind of energetic bringing

Speaker:

us together, not hostile,

Speaker:

which was a very

Speaker:

stark counterpoint to Bolsonaro's

Speaker:

politics in Latin America was

Speaker:

extremely divisive, talking down to

Speaker:

other leaders, that kind of stuff.

Speaker:

But I mean, Hugo Chavez talked

Speaker:

about this in the early 2000, talked

Speaker:

about having a one

Speaker:

solid currency.

Speaker:

It's it's, you know, just

Speaker:

the way kind of elections play out

Speaker:

across the region.

Speaker:

Not like we didn't have petrol

Speaker:

elected ten, ten, 15 years ago.

Speaker:

Right. Things would have been very

Speaker:

different. And I mean, on that note,

Speaker:

having leftist leaders in power

Speaker:

in these different countries

Speaker:

actually helps people a lot.

Speaker:

Like one of the first things Pedro

Speaker:

did was open up the Venezuela

Speaker:

Colombia border to

Speaker:

free trade. He really took the power

Speaker:

by doing this. He took the power

Speaker:

away from, you know, cartels

Speaker:

and gangs, more or less,

Speaker:

and allowed people to just, you

Speaker:

know, freely enter and exit

Speaker:

neighboring countries and people on

Speaker:

the border. It's it's an interesting

Speaker:

region because the border

Speaker:

doesn't exist. Right?

Speaker:

Like think about like the Alberta

Speaker:

the border between like Alberta and

Speaker:

like the United States.

Speaker:

If you could walk around the border

Speaker:

and across the border, you wouldn't

Speaker:

even know.

Speaker:

I wonder, in an attempt

Speaker:

to combat U.S.

Speaker:

imperialism and the forces

Speaker:

that we're talking about, do social

Speaker:

movements engage in a lot of

Speaker:

cross-national work?

Speaker:

I know we talked about Lula and

Speaker:

Chavez.

Speaker:

That's government level.

Speaker:

That's, you know, expected to be

Speaker:

working with with your neighbors.

Speaker:

But is

Speaker:

there a sense that there is

Speaker:

social movements of South

Speaker:

America, not of each individual

Speaker:

country? Because I think, you know,

Speaker:

as a guy, I hate

Speaker:

this word as a Westerner.

Speaker:

We often envision the continents

Speaker:

as

Speaker:

wholes.

Speaker:

Right. And the way that South

Speaker:

America has been treated by the

Speaker:

United States has been a little

Speaker:

bit in the same manner

Speaker:

right there, dealing with things

Speaker:

that we don't have to deal with

Speaker:

here.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

Do you find that social movements

Speaker:

have engaged in cross-national work

Speaker:

to to build out those

Speaker:

movements across borders,

Speaker:

especially with indigenous

Speaker:

movements, I would think.

Speaker:

No. Yeah, definitely like 100 and

Speaker:

like some of like every every case

Speaker:

there was, there were people talking

Speaker:

about cross-national work.

Speaker:

Every society, every organization

Speaker:

that I talk to in the 23rd

Speaker:

of January, when you walk around,

Speaker:

you see murals of martyrs.

Speaker:

And I guess one of the gentlemen I

Speaker:

was I was interviewing Esteban

Speaker:

Helena.

Speaker:

I'd ask him about like, you know,

Speaker:

were there anybody was there anybody

Speaker:

who went abroad to like.

Speaker:

I well, I guess we're talking more

Speaker:

about the guerrilla struggles.

Speaker:

So was there anybody who went to,

Speaker:

like, you know,

Speaker:

El Salvador to fight?

Speaker:

And he said, yeah.

Speaker:

And then he starts listing names

Speaker:

like dozens of people.

Speaker:

And then he's like, Oh, yeah. And in

Speaker:

Nicaragua, these were the people.

Speaker:

And then he's like, Oh, yeah, one

Speaker:

guy over here in this house is we're

Speaker:

walking like when we were kids, like

Speaker:

he he left when he was 18 to fight

Speaker:

for the Sandinistas.

Speaker:

So there's a there's an incredible

Speaker:

amount of cross-pollination.

Speaker:

I mean, like, look at the Cuban

Speaker:

revolutionary chick if I was an

Speaker:

Argentine.

Speaker:

Like they call him Che because of

Speaker:

his like straight up Argentine

Speaker:

accent.

Speaker:

So there's an incredible amount of

Speaker:

cross-pollination

Speaker:

from organized workers

Speaker:

who are looking to,

Speaker:

you know, occupied factories in

Speaker:

Brazil and in Catalonia, for

Speaker:

instance, for for help

Speaker:

and guidance and more

Speaker:

or less instruction to

Speaker:

to farmers who

Speaker:

I saw were organizing

Speaker:

like Zoom seminars with like

Speaker:

Mexican farmers as well, to talk

Speaker:

about how to fight GMOs

Speaker:

and kind of contamination in their

Speaker:

community.

Speaker:

Yeah, there's there's a an

Speaker:

an incredible push by people

Speaker:

from the basis of Venezuelan

Speaker:

society to connect with other Latin

Speaker:

Americans.

Speaker:

And I mean, the fact that everybody

Speaker:

speaks the same language is

Speaker:

incredibly helpful.

Speaker:

No doubt.

Speaker:

That's something that's clearly

Speaker:

lacking.

Speaker:

I know a lot of internationalists

Speaker:

understand the need for a global

Speaker:

structure.

Speaker:

Sorry, a lot of internationalists

Speaker:

understand the need for a global

Speaker:

struggle, but we

Speaker:

don't often engage

Speaker:

with it, most of us, in any kind of

Speaker:

meaningful way.

Speaker:

I feel like there's.

Speaker:

I took crazy notes during this

Speaker:

interview. I normally am just

Speaker:

writing down what question

Speaker:

I can ask next or

Speaker:

circle back to something.

Speaker:

But I feel like in this one I was

Speaker:

taking genuine notes

Speaker:

on where work

Speaker:

needs to be done, how,

Speaker:

you know any individual one of us

Speaker:

can play a role in that.

Speaker:

I don't know.

Speaker:

But.

Speaker:

So many lessons, Santiago,

Speaker:

you know, do you not

Speaker:

feel that way? Is that like why you

Speaker:

were excited for this particular

Speaker:

interview with Alex?

Speaker:

Oh, yeah. No, I feel like.

Speaker:

No. Yeah. We, we could spend

Speaker:

hours and hours and hours and hours

Speaker:

and do multiple

Speaker:

series of episodes on

Speaker:

all of the points that have been

Speaker:

raised and all of the points

Speaker:

that have been raised to, you know.

Speaker:

Yes, my my page is still full of

Speaker:

questions that we will never we

Speaker:

won't have time for.

Speaker:

But and I do think that

Speaker:

I think that we have to do that as

Speaker:

well. You know, I feel like

Speaker:

that's something that's not

Speaker:

being talked about enough.

Speaker:

And we look at things through

Speaker:

such such a narrow field,

Speaker:

you know, like especially I

Speaker:

mean, we're all Toronto

Speaker:

or Toronto adjacent.

Speaker:

Right. And even, like,

Speaker:

thinking about stuff outside of

Speaker:

Ontario is often

Speaker:

not even thought about.

Speaker:

And I feel like looking at.

Speaker:

These different issues and how

Speaker:

they're playing out across the

Speaker:

world. I mean, one thing,

Speaker:

you know, I wanted to mention

Speaker:

is I hadn't mentioned this earlier

Speaker:

and I was waiting for like the

Speaker:

appropriate time. But, you know,

Speaker:

as somebody who is an immigrant from

Speaker:

Latin America,

Speaker:

you know, I always kind of grappled

Speaker:

with.

Speaker:

The issue of, you know, what's going

Speaker:

on back at home and

Speaker:

should I be there?

Speaker:

Should I be here?

Speaker:

What am I doing here?

Speaker:

You know, why am I fighting

Speaker:

here? Why am I not fighting in

Speaker:

Colombia? Why am I not doing the

Speaker:

work there?

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

I guess the answer that I always

Speaker:

kind of told myself was.

Speaker:

That Canada,

Speaker:

the U.S., these Western

Speaker:

pillars of imperialism.

Speaker:

Breaking apart and fighting

Speaker:

against those structures of

Speaker:

imperialism and colonialism within

Speaker:

these countries will allow.

Speaker:

Comrades back at home

Speaker:

to be more successful in their

Speaker:

struggle.

Speaker:

And that's a feeling

Speaker:

that has been shared by a lot of

Speaker:

other Latin

Speaker:

immigrants

Speaker:

in Canada that I've worked with,

Speaker:

that I've talked to.

Speaker:

That's something that comes up a lot

Speaker:

is, you know, we have to do the work

Speaker:

here so that they can do the work

Speaker:

there.

Speaker:

And just the way I feel

Speaker:

like, you know, we forget how

Speaker:

connected everything is, but

Speaker:

it's much more connected than

Speaker:

than we discuss.

Speaker:

All of these issues playing to each

Speaker:

other and what's going on there

Speaker:

that will have repercussions here

Speaker:

because the wealth,

Speaker:

the prosperity of Western societies

Speaker:

is built on the blood

Speaker:

of Latin-America.

Speaker:

On the blood of Africa, on the blood

Speaker:

of Asia.

Speaker:

You know, the exploitation

Speaker:

of poor nations is how we

Speaker:

got the wealth.

Speaker:

And as these nations begin to

Speaker:

be more and more successful in their

Speaker:

fight against that and I mean, as of

Speaker:

right now, I have to say, like U.S.

Speaker:

imperialism is not as strong in

Speaker:

Latin America as it was.

Speaker:

The fact that Pedro

Speaker:

managed to win, the fact

Speaker:

that in Chile, Peru,

Speaker:

Argentina, Brazil,

Speaker:

Mexico, you know.

Speaker:

There have been so many recent

Speaker:

victories.

Speaker:

That was not possible

Speaker:

before.

Speaker:

And what and those are going to have

Speaker:

consequences here.

Speaker:

And figuring out

Speaker:

what's working there and how it

Speaker:

connects us here.

Speaker:

That's that's something that.

Speaker:

You know, I want to explore more.

Speaker:

I feel

Speaker:

I don't know enough and I want to

Speaker:

know so much more.

Speaker:

You know.

Speaker:

It was, like, so hard reconciling

Speaker:

my place as a researcher from from

Speaker:

the global north, just being on

Speaker:

there and asking these questions.

Speaker:

And I felt kind of like where you

Speaker:

were saying, like, I'm not a Latin

Speaker:

American by any means, but it's

Speaker:

it's like like, what can I do to

Speaker:

help these struggles advanced in

Speaker:

this country that, you know, I've

Speaker:

studied and then I've met people

Speaker:

and, you know, I've I've I've tried

Speaker:

to kind of break bread and make

Speaker:

communion with them.

Speaker:

And that's that's a hard thing we

Speaker:

have to ask ourselves to, like,

Speaker:

where can we approach

Speaker:

to to find resources and

Speaker:

kind of connect, connect the right

Speaker:

people. And I've

Speaker:

been trying to help the work just on

Speaker:

a personal note that the productive

Speaker:

workers army is doing, because

Speaker:

they're they're actually trying to

Speaker:

like build stuff for working people

Speaker:

to manage on their own.

Speaker:

Like they'll go into workplaces

Speaker:

and set up factory councils, letting

Speaker:

the workers elect their own managers

Speaker:

and restarting production.

Speaker:

This is like some some

Speaker:

stuff that I you know, it's hard to

Speaker:

that for a Canadian brain to just

Speaker:

fathom this.

Speaker:

So I've been trying to go to

Speaker:

different unions asking for money

Speaker:

for for them.

Speaker:

You know, that's the the least I can

Speaker:

do.

Speaker:

I can do for their time, their

Speaker:

stories, and just their example

Speaker:

that they keep on living day in and

Speaker:

day out.

Speaker:

But on a on a writer, you know,

Speaker:

like, you know, you can always go

Speaker:

back. And I'm not saying, like,

Speaker:

don't write.

Speaker:

I met a guy who sort of.

Speaker:

Visited lately that

Speaker:

that is on my mind.

Speaker:

It's it's possible and I can't

Speaker:

imagine what you must have felt like

Speaker:

like watching the national strike in

Speaker:

Colombia being like and I'm here in

Speaker:

winter like people are

Speaker:

people are fighting the state and

Speaker:

I'm just I'm stuck.

Speaker:

No, you have no idea.

Speaker:

And one of my one of

Speaker:

my closest friends

Speaker:

said here,

Speaker:

he's also from Colombia.

Speaker:

And we talk about this a lot, which

Speaker:

is, you know, there is a threshold,

Speaker:

there is a line, and

Speaker:

we don't know where it is, where

Speaker:

it's like, okay, it does it

Speaker:

just doesn't make any sense anymore

Speaker:

for us to be here and we

Speaker:

should go back.

Speaker:

And I don't know.

Speaker:

I just wanted to throw out there.

Speaker:

There's a writer for Venezuela

Speaker:

analysis. His name is Ricardo Vaz,

Speaker:

and he's he's a white Mozambican.

Speaker:

Parents were involved in the

Speaker:

liberation movement there on the

Speaker:

side of the A Frelimo

Speaker:

grew up there, went to school in

Speaker:

Germany, and midway through his

Speaker:

Ph.D. was like, What on earth am I

Speaker:

doing?

Speaker:

I got to leave and I got to

Speaker:

I got to go to the Bolivarian

Speaker:

Revolution. Like I've been reading

Speaker:

about this for years.

Speaker:

So he picked up his bags and

Speaker:

just flew to Venezuela.

Speaker:

And he's been there, I think, for

Speaker:

four or five years reporting

Speaker:

on the ground, kind of doing

Speaker:

analysis of like what these social

Speaker:

movements are doing.

Speaker:

And it was really, really solid work

Speaker:

and I was touched. I'm like, you

Speaker:

don't hear stories like in Canada.

Speaker:

The picture of immigration

Speaker:

we have is like desperate people

Speaker:

fleeing from abroad, settling here

Speaker:

and loving us, you know?

Speaker:

And that's not true, right?

Speaker:

Like, people can leave the

Speaker:

global north, go to the global south

Speaker:

and actually effect positive change.

Speaker:

Right. And just as you were laughing

Speaker:

at that, I think.

Speaker:

Because I'm just picturing my

Speaker:

partner listening to this part of

Speaker:

the podcast cringing

Speaker:

because often when I am super

Speaker:

frustrated with Canadian politics

Speaker:

and I have no ties

Speaker:

to South America ex

Speaker:

except being drawn to

Speaker:

the hopeful possibilities

Speaker:

and, and history.

Speaker:

And that's it.

Speaker:

We're going to Bolivia or

Speaker:

Venezuela or wherever.

Speaker:

I feel like, you know, I would

Speaker:

be most effective in that moment.

Speaker:

I probably just get in the way, to

Speaker:

be honest. But, you know, and it's

Speaker:

just laughter in response or don't

Speaker:

be silly or this look of horror,

Speaker:

right. Like and so

Speaker:

but hearing Santiago, that hits a

Speaker:

different note. You know, I could

Speaker:

not imagine having those

Speaker:

ties and

Speaker:

feeling that pull like

Speaker:

what I feel is completely different.

Speaker:

And

Speaker:

yeah, it grows more of out of a

Speaker:

frustration and

Speaker:

completely different place than what

Speaker:

you shared with us.

Speaker:

Santiago.

Speaker:

But Alex.

Speaker:

What will you do with this

Speaker:

knowledge?

Speaker:

I think after my field work, I hit

Speaker:

a point where I'm like, Academia is

Speaker:

not for me.

Speaker:

This is like, yeah, this.

Speaker:

I can't just like I've talked

Speaker:

to these people doing these like

Speaker:

great things to actually like effect

Speaker:

positive social change, to

Speaker:

even just survive with dignity

Speaker:

and think of like being a professor

Speaker:

is what I want, you know,

Speaker:

I'm going to finish my dissertation,

Speaker:

hopefully rights and try

Speaker:

my best to amplify these voices.

Speaker:

Sierra and Chris, who I mentioned

Speaker:

earlier, they run a school, a

Speaker:

podcast called The Scholar, the

Speaker:

Quadros.

Speaker:

And you know, they do great work,

Speaker:

for instance, and I've seen the way

Speaker:

they do interviews.

Speaker:

Like when you read like a scholarly

Speaker:

books, interviews, it's 90% of it is

Speaker:

the words of the scholar.

Speaker:

But when I read Syrian Christians

Speaker:

work, they're not even

Speaker:

the voices. And on the page it's

Speaker:

just quotes

Speaker:

from from people just like these

Speaker:

block quotes of like, this is what

Speaker:

somebody said to me about like this

Speaker:

topic about a factory

Speaker:

seizure, about producing

Speaker:

without the boss,

Speaker:

about, you know,

Speaker:

how a community goes about,

Speaker:

you know, harvesting crops

Speaker:

in a democratic way.

Speaker:

So there's I really think there's a

Speaker:

different way to do even like the

Speaker:

intellectual work of activism.

Speaker:

And I'd like to explore that outside

Speaker:

of the neoliberal academy,

Speaker:

the shitbag that the university is

Speaker:

today.

Speaker:

Storytelling is just such a powerful

Speaker:

way to relay that kind

Speaker:

of knowledge and an experience

Speaker:

right as

Speaker:

an alternative to traditional

Speaker:

academic forms.

Speaker:

But thank

Speaker:

you, Alex. I mean, like Santiago's

Speaker:

true. We could sit on here

Speaker:

for hours, but I feel like.

Speaker:

This was a more of a foundational

Speaker:

for blueprints of disruption in

Speaker:

terms of our first foray into

Speaker:

drawing parallels with South America

Speaker:

and.

Speaker:

Drawing on that knowledge.

Speaker:

So it certainly won't

Speaker:

end there. We're going to be in

Speaker:

touch because all I can think right

Speaker:

now is a follow

Speaker:

up with productive

Speaker:

workers army.

Speaker:

I know a few people who speak

Speaker:

fluent English. So, so definitely

Speaker:

when when when it's time

Speaker:

hit me up and I'll connect you to

Speaker:

people.

Speaker:

Something like that.

Speaker:

And even without the English

Speaker:

journalist manual open what I said

Speaker:

in in Espanol También.

Speaker:

But I'll pay for the English

Speaker:

transcript.

Speaker:

Like I'm also down to do

Speaker:

some work in another language, you

Speaker:

know, and.

Speaker:

But no, that would be amazing.

Speaker:

That would be amazing.

Speaker:

Well, thank you guys for having me

Speaker:

on. I definitely have to pass on a

Speaker:

bunch of resources, it looks like.

Speaker:

Certainly will be sure to share

Speaker:

whatever you share with us in the

Speaker:

show notes. So people who are

Speaker:

listening and they want to know a

Speaker:

little bit more, please check this

Speaker:

show notes and we'll you

Speaker:

know, we'll link you through that.

Speaker:

But like I said, you know, many more

Speaker:

discussions to be had on on this

Speaker:

topic for sure.

Speaker:

I have to pour through my notes and

Speaker:

see how many tangents we can go on.

Speaker:

I hope Mini-Series is

Speaker:

brewing in my mind.

Speaker:

And Santiago, I can just see the

Speaker:

gears working and the grid tells me

Speaker:

everything I need to know.

Speaker:

I wish I recorded this visually.

Speaker:

I think people would have had fun

Speaker:

watching us get all giddy as Alex

Speaker:

told those stories.

Speaker:

Thank you so much.

Speaker:

Especially the way you relayed that

Speaker:

with similar to the writers

Speaker:

that you talked about

Speaker:

by simply

Speaker:

giving us the stories that you heard

Speaker:

and allowing us to

Speaker:

soak them up and take what we needed

Speaker:

from them.

Speaker:

Definitely. You're welcome again.

Speaker:

This is turning into a Canadian send

Speaker:

off. Thank you for having me on

Speaker:

again.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

That is a wrap on another episode

Speaker:

of Blueprints of Disruption.

Speaker:

Thank you for joining us.

Speaker:

Also, a very big thank you

Speaker:

to the producer of our show,

Speaker:

Santiago Quintero.

Speaker:

Blueprint of Disruption is an

Speaker:

independent production operated

Speaker:

cooperatively.

Speaker:

You can follow us on Twitter at BP

Speaker:

of Disruption.

Speaker:

If you'd like to help us continue

Speaker:

disrupting the status quo,

Speaker:

please share our content.

Speaker:

And if you have the means, consider

Speaker:

becoming a patron.

Speaker:

Not only does our support come from

Speaker:

the progressive community, so does

Speaker:

our content.

Speaker:

So reach out to us and let us know

Speaker:

what or who we should be amplifying.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube