How can we know God?

He's not a part of this universe of time, space, with its forms of causation, movement, or even being. So how is it possible to know Him?

That is what this episode deals with.

Note: we did have some technical problems with the audio on this one, so parts of it are a bit muffled (but not too bad).

Nathan, how you doing today?

2

Doing well.

3

Excited to kick off this new series.

4

Yeah, people probably don't realize this,

we've actually had several weeks off.

5

Yeah, a little bit of a break.

6

You went on a nice trip.

7

I did.

8

I went to see some

family members out west.

9

It was beautiful.

10

How was that?

11

Where'd you go and what

were some highlights?

12

Well, I went to see some family in

Arizona and then also my daughter

13

and her husband near Las Vegas and

did some hiking by myself And then

14

my daughter and her husband, I went

to Death Valley Which is aptly named

15

because there were very few living

things there that you could see anyway.

16

Bacteria, microbes, I suppose, but

yeah, it was a very very desolate place.

17

Wow, wow.

18

But beautiful.

19

The color of the rocks, the formations.

20

The landscape was

otherworldly, but beautiful.

21

Yeah, I haven't spent really

any time except for my brother's

22

wedding out in, uh, California.

23

I haven't spent any time out west.

24

Yeah, I love it.

25

It's very different than Indiana.

26

Always very jealous of the, the

photos that you Showing get back.

27

Well, good.

28

I like to make you feel nice.

29

So today we are starting a new series.

30

Yeah, we are I'm excited about

this, but also feel like I don't

31

have all my ducks in a row.

32

So we'll see how it goes.

33

That's okay That's okay.

34

So the series is about knowing God Yeah,

and why did you want to talk about knowing

35

God and what's your vision for the series?

36

This series can really be at the

intersection of faith and philosophy,

37

because the idea that we can know God,

that there is a God that we can know, is

38

a very important philosophical concept.

39

In fact, I would argue it's

probably the most, it has the most

40

implications, if there is a God.

41

But even if there is a God,

the question further down the

42

road then is, can you know him?

43

It certainly would be different than

knowing just another fact Furthermore,

44

one of the reasons I want to talk about

this is I think both non believers as

45

well as believers, religious believers,

we tend to have a deficient view of God.

46

So it's easy for people who have

a very shallow, superficial idea

47

of what God is to dismiss Him.

48

But also for religious believers

who claim to have belief in God,

49

if that belief in God is based

upon a very shallow, uninformed

50

understanding of who God really is.

51

It will lead to a

shallow, uninformed faith.

52

I remember one of my seminary

professors saying, How we think matters.

53

Sure.

54

Especially how we think about God.

55

And I just remember as we went on in

that course, realizing the implications.

56

Oh man, yeah, how you, how you

think about God totally does matter.

57

Thinking through the four great

worldviews, I see the series as very

58

naturally following that because it's

like, okay, so if there is a God and

59

if the theistic worldview is good and

valuable and worth embracing, what next?

60

Can we know God?

61

Yes and no.

62

I like part of that answer.

63

I would say, yes, we can know, but

we have to understand that knowing

64

God is not like knowing other things

that we may have knowledge of.

65

How so?

66

We tend to think of God as part of

the furniture of this universe, we

67

feel like, okay, we're going to apply

the same methods of knowing, same

68

epistemological method, to knowing

God as we would know, for example,

69

the moon, or Jupiter, or the bottom

of the ocean, or some historical fact.

70

When you begin to think about the

claim that the scriptures make, you

71

realize that you have a problem in

understanding the knowledge of God.

72

God is not an object god cannot

be an object of knowledge in

73

the same way objects of this

universe are objects of knowledge.

74

So, when

75

we talk about knowing God, we're using

that word knowing in an analogous

76

way to knowing the things about this

universe, but it's only analogous.

77

It's not quite the same, because

when you talk about knowing God,

78

you're actually speaking about having

knowledge of something that exists

79

on the other side of the creator.

80

So, if Christianity is true, or Islam,

or Judaism, matter, fundamentally, there

81

is one divide, and that divide is between

the Creator God and all that He makes.

82

So the things that He makes would include

this entire physical universe, as well

83

as spiritual beings, angels, demons,

whatever else you might want to call them.

84

All these things exist on this

side of that great divide.

85

Angels, clouds, Venus.

86

History, the bottom of the ocean,

Antarctica, the people within this world,

87

all of us exist within this side divide.

88

On the other side is God.

89

God is fundamentally different

than the things of this world.

90

So the things of this world are

all going to have this in common,

91

that they are created by this God.

92

And we have a similarity in

knowing how to know about them.

93

We have a similarity in

how we know these things.

94

But God is fundamentally different.

95

So the things we experience in

this world, for example, they

96

all partake, of space and time.

97

the things we experience, like

you, I see you as a person, you

98

have a physical dimension to you.

99

You have a location within space as well.

100

You have a location within time.

101

All these things are not true about God.

102

He's fundamentally different.

103

What's also true about you is that

the laws of this universe, the laws

104

of cause and effect, the laws of

chemistry, the laws apply to you.

105

You are bound by them and to some

degree, at least, they control you.

106

All those things are not true

of God because he made them.

107

He's not bound by them.

108

He made time and space.

109

The normal ways that we know people

are by using our rationality,

110

including the laws of logic.

111

And yet, I think we cannot apply

those in the same way to God.

112

Now that doesn't mean That he's an

irrational being, the laws of logic

113

don't apply to him in any sense.

114

But rather he is the one who

produces those laws, they're the

115

product of his rational mind.

116

He is not underneath.

117

And I think it's a very good

question to ask, can God do things

118

To us at least seem illogical.

119

Can God break what we would interpret

as the laws of logic, just as we

120

presume that he could also break the

laws of physics when he does miracles?

121

My point is.

122

Not that God is irrational, but

that he is beyond human rationality,

123

because he's the one who created it.

124

So, when we're talking about knowing

God, we don't know him in the same

125

way as the other things in this

universe that are within this spatial

126

temporal complex, as it were, that are

fundamentally similar to us in the fact

127

that they're Bound by the laws of physics

and the laws of logic and rationality.

128

God is wholly different because

he is the one who brought

129

all these things into being.

130

I find it very difficult to

get this across, but that's

131

what I'm trying to get at.

132

Yeah, I think that will take

some time to let soak in.

133

Because it's hard to think about

that fundamental distinction because

134

we live our lives considering other

created beings and other things.

135

So, everything that we experience is

limited by the laws of physics, and logic,

136

time, and space, and all those things.

137

Yes.

138

Let me give you one example.

139

one of the great disputes within

Christendom, the Christian worldview,

140

is this whole idea of how can humans

have free will if God knows everything?

141

Part of the reason I think we're stuck

on this is because the way our minds work

142

understand that causality works one way.

143

that is causality in terms

of time works one way.

144

One thing has to exist before

another thing to cause it.

145

But if God is a temporal, so not just

eternal in the sense that he's always

146

been there, but exists outside of time

itself, and outside the sequentiality

147

of time we experience, then there's

no reason to think that for him

148

causation has to Work that one way

149

so him knowing things Doesn't necessarily

mean that we don't have free will.

150

Exactly.

151

So it's not an either or.

152

Exactly.

153

So you just solve that, that problem.

154

Well, some people would just say I punted

it, But yeah, I think when you devise

155

a system that is strongly based upon

the idea of certain ideas that God is

156

sovereign over everything to the point

where you denigrate free will and human

157

causation to any degree, that perhaps

part of the issue is that we're simply

158

not in an epistemological position.

159

We're not in the right position

to understand causality fully.

160

Yeah, and just to bring it

back to the beginning, that

161

will affect Christian practice.

162

It will.

163

I mean, if you think that God knows

everything and God is predestining

164

everything Then that will certainly

shape the way that we pray.

165

Because maybe we don't need to evangelize

because if they're going to get saved,

166

they're going to get saved anyway.

167

that how we think really

does matter, right?

168

So I imagine we'll get into God's temporal

nature perhaps and these kinds of things

169

and Later, but since we're just kind of

introducing that we don't yeah, I can't

170

wait to do that In fact, my master's

thesis was on the relationship between

171

God and time . Yeah, we could really get

in the weeds on that one if you want.

172

Yeah, I'd love to.

173

Maybe I'll read that and we can

have a whole discussion on it.

174

Oh yeah, it's fascinating,

everything you're reading.

175

I'm sure.

176

It's a page turner.

177

Yeah, yeah.

178

Um, gets back to that question though

of like differences between deism.

179

Deism, perhaps.

180

If God is our temporal, can he interact?

181

Can he make a difference if we

just wind it up and let it go?

182

Okay, so it seems like philosophy is

maybe one tool in our toolbox of how

183

we can Begin to think about the nature

of God and begin to understand how we

184

can begin knowing God but I wonder if

there are other tools in our toolbox

185

we can't know all about God.

186

There's a fundamental difference between

creation and creator, but there are

187

certain things about God that we can know.

188

So how can we, how can we know God?

189

Yeah, you asked about whether

philosophy can help in this or

190

not, and obviously I think it can.

191

That's good.

192

Yeah, otherwise Glad you conceded

that up front, because our

193

listeners might be confused.

194

Right, and we'd be wasting

our time and theirs, right?

195

Philosophy, I think, can be a great

help because it teaches us how to

196

think about the right issues in the

right way, and in particular to ask

197

questions that go deeper, second

order questions you might call.

198

And by doing that, it forces

us to ask and answer questions.

199

Sometimes those questions

can lead us to admit that we

200

don't really know the answer.

201

And that's a good thing to know as well.

202

Philosophy can be a great help It

could also be a straitjacket.

203

And what I mean by that is I

believe you don't know God primarily

204

through the rational means or

philosophical methods by itself.

205

What do you mean?

206

I believe that to know God, at

least in the experience of myself

207

and many other people through the

ages, to know God in this way goes

208

beyond what you can do in philosophy.

209

Goes beyond what we normally

think of rational analysis.

210

Let me see if I can

explain what I mean here.

211

When we know things in this world, most of

the time we're operating as an observer.

212

So I'm watching some scene, and

maybe it's unfolding in the park.

213

or a football stadium that I'm watching,

and I am an observer of what happens.

214

So if I'm at a football game or

I'm at a basketball arena and I'm

215

watching this, I have the knowledge,

true knowledge of what's happening.

216

I understand the play, after it occurs

at least, I understand what happens,

217

I understand why they get points or

why they didn't get points right.

218

So I have an observational

knowledge of that.

219

And really if you expand that, that's

primarily how we interact with the world.

220

Or kind of limited to that.

221

Because of our senses.

222

We are.

223

Again, if I know a fact about history,

what I'm doing is I am observing

224

what has been taught about that.

225

I'm kind of choosing to fit that

into my knowledge puzzle somewhere.

226

Or if I learn a fact about to the moons

of Saturn, I am observing knowledge

227

that's outside of me, trying to put

that into my mind and what I think

228

about things, how I interpret the world.

229

That is an observational

type of knowledge.

230

it's an objective type of knowledge,

or at least it claims to be.

231

But there is also another kind of

knowledge that doesn't eliminate that,

232

but goes a step beyond You might

call it the knowledge of the agent.

233

So an agent is not someone who is

watching the football game, they're

234

actually someone on the field doing

the football game, making the results.

235

Now to extend that analogy to human

life, I believe that there is a way of

236

interacting with this world that's not

just observing, but is actually an agent

237

within this world, and that part of what

you do in that is actually Knowledge,

238

I'm not saying that very well, that

when you interact with things of this

239

world, you don't have to do so just

as an observer, but also as an agent.

240

And as an agent, you don't simply observe

things, you choose things, you do things.

241

And I believe that if our knowledge

of God is simply, we're thinking

242

of that as an observer, then what

we're thinking of rationally is a

243

set of ideas about a person or a

thing or a concept that we call God.

244

But going beyond that, there

is also a type of knowledge

245

that only comes as an agent,

246

there's not perfect analogy to this.

247

But I can think of my

own wife, for example.

248

There was a time when I knew

her only observationally, right?

249

There was a time where I knew her

as, okay, this is her name, this is

250

what she looks like, this is what

year and how old she is, right?

251

I know certain facts And yet, there

comes to be a time where I also Not

252

only know that she is my wife, but

she is my wife because of my choice.

253

There is a knowledge that comes

about that's true about her, but

254

only because of the choices I have

chosen to make in regards to her.

255

That's closer to what

I'm trying to get at.

256

And not just myself, but Kant and

Kierkegaard talked about this idea a lot.

257

That this aging type of knowledge,

you could call it a subjective type of

258

knowledge, or an existential kind of.

259

Subjective here doesn't mean arbitrary,

like your, you know, teacher is subjective

260

if they favor one student over another.

261

But the idea that I am a subject who

is, Making this claim to knowledge.

262

I'm not just an observer.

263

I am a subject.

264

And I have to understand,

talking about God.

265

It's not enough to have just an objective,

observer type of knowledge, because

266

you're talking about the issue of faith.

267

Yeah, it makes me think of Martin

Buber's two different kinds of

268

relationships, like an I It relationship,

269

where there's a subject and an

object, versus an I Thou relationship,

270

where there's two subjects,

and Relationships with people

271

should be I thou relationships.

272

It's not just, about knowing about

somebody, but actually knowing somebody.

273

Actually, I think that's very

apropos, and I'm glad that

274

you've read him a little bit.

275

yeah, I think it's very

much along the same lines.

276

I think, another thought I

had is, have some experience

277

overseas and, learn Spanish.

278

In Spanish, there's two different

words for know, two different verbs.

279

One is saber, which basically

means to know about.

280

And the other one is conocer,

which is to know somebody.

281

So, I know about.

282

President Biden.

283

But I know you.

284

And , it's a huge difference.

285

It's a huge difference knowing somebody

than just knowing about somebody.

286

Some people I've heard, maybe it's

Augustine or Saint Anselm, talked about

287

faith seeking understanding and how in

order to have this I Thou relationship

288

and to know somebody or know God

instead of just knowing about God,

289

you kind of have to begin with faith.

290

Do you think that that's true, that

you can't really begin to know a god

291

that you don't believe in, or do you

think that it go the other way around?

292

Yeah, the question in Christian

philosophy and theology has been, do

293

we believe in order to understand, or

do we understand in order to believe?

294

Yeah.

295

And obviously That's a

good way of putting it.

296

So I believe both of those are true.

297

I believe that

298

when I say I understand in order to

believe that that is a true statement,

299

that I don't believe simply without

understanding, without a rational.

300

capacity for choosing one as

intellectually more valuable and

301

coherent than the other choice.

302

So I don't choose apart

from my reasoning ability.

303

But at the same time, I

think the other is true.

304

And the other, I think, probably is the

one that most people don't develop enough,

305

that I understand because I believe.

306

So when I come to a certain place, My

understanding can give me the ability

307

to discern what are the options and

why one might be better than the other.

308

But at the same time, really

understanding God and his ways comes

309

only after you make that choice.

310

So, First, I believe we do choose

to believe because we understand

311

something, but the fullness of our

understanding comes after we believe.

312

So that's really good because no

matter where the starting place

313

is, this discussion about know

God or God's attributes or that

314

kind of thing can be helpful.

315

Because if you are already coming from

a perspective where you believe and

316

this can help you learn more about.

317

God bless you.

318

God, which can shape your affections

and your posture toward them and your

319

passions and all that kind of thing.

320

Just like once you started a relationship

with your wife, you got to know more

321

about her, which led you to love her

more because there was more that you knew

322

about her and more that you could love.

323

Exactly.

324

But then from the other perspective,

if somebody listening has not started

325

believing in, God, then This can

still help them get to know more

326

Okay, so we talked a little bit

ago about philosophy and how we can

327

get to know God through philosophy.

328

I wonder if there are other

tools in the toolbox, so to

329

speak, that can help us know God.

330

Sure.

331

let me list out a few ways I

think that we can know God.

332

And these are going to be complementary,

333

and the first way that I think we

can know God is through the natural

334

world So scriptures talk about the

heavens declaring the glory of God.

335

And the heavens?

336

Uh huh.

337

Meaning like heaven?

338

No, the skies.

339

The skies, okay.

340

The skies declare the glory of God?

341

Uh huh.

342

And then in Romans chapter

1, Paul talks about

343

all people should be able

to see that there is a God

344

because of what he has done.

345

So, he says there is some sort of

knowledge we can have about God

346

simply by observing what He has made.

347

the idea being that we look at the,

the cosmos, and then we draw the

348

conclusion that it's more logical

to believe that there is a being

349

who created that, and then think

about how powerful that being is.

350

So,

351

I should make a distinction here

between the cosmos as being a sign

352

and the cosmos as being a proof.

353

I believe Paul was talking

about it being a sign.

354

That when you look at this physical

world, or in this physical universe that

355

we are in, it could point us towards

the fact that there is someone who

356

created this and brought this about.

357

That's different than, a proof.

358

A sign can be something that says, look

towards that instead of just this, where

359

the proof is, okay, because there is

this, therefore there has to be this.

360

And so the cosmological proofs of

God are a different issue than a

361

cosmological sign pointing towards

God, at least for our discussion here.

362

So one way we see the incredible world,

and if we choose to at least, we can

363

interpret this not only as being beautiful

and wondrous and mystical and powerful in

364

itself, but also as pointing towards God.

365

The wonder, the mystery, the

power of the one who created it.

366

Yeah, so that verse that you're talking

about is Romans 1 20 says, Since the

367

creation of the world, God's invisible

qualities, his eternal power and

368

divine nature, have been clearly seen.

369

that makes sense to me that, I mean,

if you think about an artist who

370

creates a work of art, say a painting,,

you can see a little bit, I mean it

371

takes some, some deciphering and some

thought to think through maybe what

372

they're thinking or what's going on

in their mind or their heart, what

373

their value, that kind of thing.

374

Right.

375

So it would make sense that we could

look around at creation and see color

376

and order and see beauty and see,

you know, some of these things that

377

might begin to hint at the nature.

378

So I think it's a legitimate

type of knowledge.

379

So theologians, philosophers

would call that a natural

380

theology or a natural revelation.

381

Natural theology would be building,

ideas about God based upon that natural

382

revelation just means that God reveals

himself through the natural world.

383

There are some theologians who rejected

that, especially Karl Barth, but for

384

the most part I think that's pretty non

controversial, that there is at least a

385

sign that nature is pointing towards God

and we can have some knowledge of God.

386

Now is that knowledge

sufficient in itself?

387

No, because it doesn't show you anything

about necessarily the heart of God,

388

it might show you power, something

about his appreciation of beauty and

389

mystery, but it doesn't show you.

390

Much beyond that, perhaps.

391

That's general revelation, but

more specific revelation would

392

be through the scriptures.

393

So that would be the second way

that we can know God, is what he

394

reveals in the scriptures, primarily

in For us, at least, what we would

395

call the Old and New Testament.

396

Um, and they tell us

about this particular god.

397

They tell us about his interaction

with human history, or at least

398

some people within human history.

399

They tell us about his goal, tell us

about his attributes and his nature,

400

what he is like, what he likes and

what he doesn't like, what he values

401

and what he doesn't, especially in

terms of human choices and stuff.

402

So, that is the second type of

knowledge, is the scripture.

403

Yeah, I like that.

404

I think that that's tough because

scripture is, so much of it

405

is written in narrative form.

406

It is.

407

So it's not like there's a book,

like first and second attributes.

408

First and second attributes, I like that.

409

It'd be a good one.

410

Yeah, these are God's attributes.

411

But yeah, I think you certainly see that,

the narrative arc of God's redemption

412

is good and he is drawing people

into relationship with himself, his

413

attributes like hospitality and grace.

414

I mean, you certainly see that, and

I, I imagine that that will be part

415

of moving forward as we get into

some of these specific attributes.

416

Scripture will be one of the ways in

which we understand God's character.

417

Right.

418

Yes, and then the third one, it's

going to be less clear, but I

419

believe that we know God, at least as

Christians, through the incarnation.

420

What's that?

421

That's a big word.

422

Right.

423

You know what it is.

424

But yeah, I'm glad you're

explaining it for everyone

425

because some people might not.

426

Incarnate means to make something

physical that wasn't physical, basically.

427

Incarnate means That God himself,

walked into this space time matrix,

428

walked into this physical universe in

the form of Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

429

So that's what we are claiming.

430

And that through that, then, he lived a

perfect life, he taught us about the true

431

God, and then he died a vicarious death.

432

Vicarious means that he

died for somebody else.

433

Not because of his own

sins or, what he deserved,

434

,

so the reason I want to bring that out is because to me, in one

435

sense, it's part of our scriptural

knowledge, so it's part of the special

436

revelation that is the scriptures.

437

But at the same time, it is a piece

of knowledge that if you believe

438

that, if you believe that God in love

incarnated the Trinity in the form

439

of Jesus Christ, and that he died so

that we could be reconciled to God.

440

That changes everything else

you read in the scriptures

441

as well as really in nature.

442

So to me it's a it's a special

kind of knowledge because it forces

443

a reinterpretation of the other.

444

Yeah, that's one thing that's

pretty unique to Christianity.

445

Yeah, it is.

446

You're not going to find

that in Judaism or Islam.

447

No, and I think our Jewish friends

probably Get very frustrated with us,

448

how we interpret certain Old Testament

passages or Hebrew Bible passages.

449

Well, because we view it

through a Christological lens.

450

Yes.

451

I'll just bring up, a couple, sections

of scripture that I think about.

452

of course, John 1, where it talks about

The Lagos, or the first principle, the

453

word becoming flesh, and that being Jesus.

454

And there's Colossians 1, 15,

which says that the Son, or Jesus,

455

is the image, the invisible God.

456

The firstborn over all creation

for in him all things were created.

457

When we look at Jesus, we see God.

458

And then I really like Hebrews as well.

459

One, can you go ahead and

read the rest of that?

460

Yes, Colossians 1 15 through 20.

461

Here is Colossians 1 I'll just read 15

through 20 says the Sun talking about

462

Jesus is the image of the invisible God

The firstborn over all creation, for

463

in him all things were created, things

in heaven and on earth, visible and

464

invisible, whether thrones or powers or

rulers or authorities, all things have

465

been created through him and forth.

466

He is before all things and in

him all things hold together.

467

He is the head of the body, the

church, he is the beginning and

468

the firstborn from among the dead,

resurrection there, so that in

469

everything he might have the supremacy.

470

For God was pleased to have his

fullness dwell in him, and through him

471

to reconcile to himself all things,

whether things on earth or things in

472

heaven, by making peace with bloodshed.

473

Now, if you believe that, that

changes your philosophy about nature.

474

Say more there.

475

Well, because nature has a point then.

476

This physical universe that

we're in didn't just happen.

477

it's not the result of, chance.

478

It's not the result of necessity.

479

It has a goal and a purpose somehow

wrapped up into being this arena.

480

in which God brings all things into

fruition and fullness under Jesus

481

Christ, including reconciling us to

Him, and that we have a share in that.

482

So there is a purpose, there is a goal

for which all things were created.

483

And if you believe that, Then you

have a fundamentally different

484

understanding about the universe

because you understand the reason.

485

All things were created by him,

which by the way, is so fascinating

486

because in the beginning God created

the heavens and the earth, right?

487

And that new Testament passage is saying

that the sun was Also creating, so

488

Jesus is God who created creation, but

also created through him and for him.

489

So that purpose, yeah.

490

So there's another passage here, it's

a little bit shorter, in Hebrews 1

491

It says that the sun is the radiance

of God's glory, and the exact

492

representation is yin, sustaining

all things by his powerful word.

493

That's so neat.

494

When you look to Jesus, you see God.

495

Gets to the doctrine of the Trinity,

which we'll get into as well.

496

But to me, it's, I love what you

say, that we can understand God by

497

looking to the Incarnation, because

in Christian theology, God never

498

acts in a way that isn't Christ like.

499

God never acts apart from His purposes.

500

So understanding that,

that means everything.

501

Yeah, so, to sum up so far, I

believe there is a legitimate

502

knowledge we can have about God,

at least His power and existence.

503

It's at least being a rational belief

based upon the world around it.

504

We have the scriptures that we

also believe give more specific

505

testimony to who God is.

506

And then we interpret both those

things, especially by the incarnation

507

and cross of Jesus Christ.

508

Those are, in a sense, objective

in that you and I can share them.

509

So they're objective in the

sense that they're not something

510

that's distinct to me as opposed

to you at different subjects.

511

Sure.

512

Those can be facts that we

can just kind of adhere to.

513

Right.

514

And people can disagree

about the facts, obviously.

515

Many do.

516

Right.

517

But they are facts outside

of us, necessarily.

518

But they can be treated

as an I It relationship.

519

It's sometimes, yeah.

520

But I also believe that

there is a knowing that is.

521

There is an agent type of knowing

when it comes to knowing God.

522

I believe that each person, within

their own journey, especially if they're

523

seeking, can have a knowledge of God

that is valid for themselves, decision

524

making, for what they value, what they

choose to do with their life, based upon

525

their own experience of God, whether

it's some dramatic answer to a prayer,

526

whether it's some help God has given,

some insight that He's brought through

527

His Word or through other things.

528

Or maybe something beyond that.

529

There is a way in which I know about

God because of an interaction, and that

530

interaction is going to be very personal,

so it's going to be very subjective.

531

It's going to be something that I choose

to understand in a certain way, but to

532

me that is a type of knowledge, it's a

subjective type of knowledge, it's not

533

a knowledge that you can necessarily

evaluate or judge, because I could

534

never really explain it to you fully.

535

But for me, as a subject, as a person, to

me, that is a very real type of knowledge.

536

No, I think that there's a natural analogy

here, thinking about human relationships.

537

I mean, I have a friendship with you,

I have a friendship with your wife.

538

So I know your wife to some

degree, but not like you know her.

539

Your relationship with her is much more

personal, by nature of being married.

540

You're talking about a knowing that

goes beyond just knowing facts to

541

actually Having some sort of personal,

subjective experience with it.

542

Yes.

543

And that subjective experience then

actually is a form of knowledge as well.

544

So that's not to be, it's

not to be discredited.

545

No.

546

I'm with you.

547

I think that's a lot of what it's about.

548

I don't think if someone's evaluating

it for their own selves, probably my

549

experience doesn't necessarily count

too much in their own evaluation

550

of, that, but it does for me.

551

I think that it can.

552

I mean, I think that, in a past episode,

in the Faith and Doubt episode, we

553

talked about sometimes When you maybe

don't sense God's presence or you're

554

doubting, you can still, I think you

said, stand on the backs of giants.

555

Or borrow your faith.

556

Borrow your faith.

557

That sort of concept of within

community, even when my personal

558

experience is lacking or something,

you can still see the faith of others.

559

And that can be meaningful.

560

I think we can have legitimate

knowledge about God in these ways.

561

But at the same time, at the

same time, we're talking about

562

knowing in a different sense.

563

So, I want to come back to this idea that

the goal is not to know God as an object

564

of knowledge like we know other things.

565

No.

566

The goal is not to know God like we

know historical fact, like we know a

567

scientific theory, like we know some

part of this universe, like I might know

568

the city of Franklin that we live in.

569

I believe.

570

That we need to internalize this

as an existential choice of who

571

I am, what I view life is about.

572

It has to be the knowledge, not only of

the observer, I have to choose, if I

573

believe this, to let this change my life,

574

so, that's what I'm trying to get at.

575

I think it's good, it's helpful

to talk about knowing God.

576

So in coming episodes, we'll talk about,

knowing God, especially in some terms and

577

some categories that will be very familiar

to philosophy, infinity and whatnot.

578

And I think those are going to

be very helpful, at least they've

579

been very helpful to me in the,

in my own spiritual journey.

580

But the goal is not to know facts

about God, but to use those as a

581

way to actually know this God in

an existential relational way.

582

Well, that'll be, that'll be really good.

583

I'm, I'm really excited for this.

584

I think that this is a perfect

discussion that's kind of at the

585

intersection of philosophy and faith.

586

Because like you said, some attributes

will be very familiar to philosophy

587

and then some of it will Dip into

theology but all for the purpose of

588

knowing and loving Right exactly.

589

All right.

590

I think that's all I have unless

you have any more questions.

591

That's good.

592

Sounds good.

593

Thanks so much All right.

594

See you next time