Artwork for podcast Doing Divorce Different with Lesa Koski
Protecting Assets in Divorce: Prenups, Postnups, Trusts & Inheritance Explained with Estate Planning Attorney Melissa Miroslavich
21st July 2026 • Doing Divorce Different with Lesa Koski • Lesa Koski
00:00:00 00:31:52

Share Episode

Shownotes

Protecting assets in divorce doesn't have to be confusing. Learn how prenups, postnuptial agreements, trusts, inheritance, and estate planning can help protect your financial future before or during marriage.

What happens to an inheritance in a divorce? Does putting assets into a trust automatically protect them? Is a prenuptial agreement only for wealthy couples? Can a postnuptial agreement protect your family if addiction, business ownership, or financial concerns become part of your marriage?

In this episode of Doing Divorce Different, Lesa Koski sits down with Minnesota estate planning attorney Melissa Miroslavich to answer the questions many people don't realize they should be asking until it's too late.

Together they discuss protecting assets in divorce, the differences between marital and non-marital property, when prenuptial agreements and postnuptial agreements make sense, how trusts actually work, and why estate planning should be part of every family's long-term plan.

Whether you're happily married, engaged, considering divorce, or simply planning for the future, this conversation will help you better understand your options and make informed decisions.

In this episode you'll learn:

• What a prenup really does (and doesn't do)

• When a postnuptial agreement may be appropriate

• How inheritance is treated during divorce

• The difference between marital and non-marital property

• Common misconceptions about trusts

• How addiction or financial struggles can affect long-term planning

• Why mediation allows families to create customized solutions

Every family is unique, and every situation deserves thoughtful planning. This episode is educational in nature and is not legal advice. If you have questions about your own circumstances, consult an experienced attorney in your state.

If this episode helped you, please subscribe, leave a review, and share it with someone who may benefit from understanding how to better protect their family and financial future.

Timestamps

(00:00) Welcome and introduction to protecting assets in marriage and divorce

(02:15) What every couple should know about prenuptial agreements

(08:30) Marital vs. non-marital property explained

(13:45) Can inheritance stay separate during divorce?

(20:05) Trusts explained: Revocable vs. irrevocable trusts

(29:40) Real-life divorce scenario involving inherited assets

(37:20) Addiction, financial protection, and postnuptial agreements

(48:15) Divorce, legal separation, or postnuptial agreement—which offers the most protection?

(56:10) Estate planning after divorce

(1:02:45) Beneficiary designations people often forget to update

(1:07:30) Final thoughts and practical planning tips

Key Takeaways

  • A prenuptial agreement is more than planning for divorce—it creates clarity, transparency, and shared expectations before marriage.
  • Simply placing assets into a trust does not automatically protect them during a divorce.
  • Keeping inherited assets separate is essential if you want to preserve their non-marital character.
  • Postnuptial agreements can help couples proactively address financial concerns, but they have unique legal requirements.
  • Estate planning and beneficiary designations should always be reviewed after a divorce or major life change.

Guest Bio

Melissa Miroslavich is a Minnesota attorney focusing on estate planning, prenuptial agreements, postnuptial agreements, business succession planning, and asset protection strategies. She helps individuals, families, and business owners create thoughtful legal plans that protect what matters most while preparing for life's expected—and unexpected—transitions.

Resources Mentioned

Melissa Miroslavich Law

https://miroslavichlaw.com

Schedule a Divorce Clarity Session

https://www.lesakoski.com/offers/2HAtaGZ6/checkout

Divorce Comeback Community

https://www.skool.com/divorce-clarity-40-8663/about

Soberlink – A Trusted Tool for Accountability in Family Law Cases

https://www.soberlink.com/divorce/family-law?utm_source=affiliatelink&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=lesa-koski-affiliatelink

OsteoStrong Minnesota – Bone Health & Strength

https://osteostrongmn.com/affiliate-referral-koski/

Tags / Keywords

protecting assets in divorce, divorce, divorce mediation, mediation, prenuptial agreement, prenup, postnuptial agreement, postnup, inheritance and divorce, trusts, revocable trust, irrevocable trust, estate planning, marital property, non-marital property, asset protection, Minnesota divorce, divorce planning, divorce coach, Lesa Koski, Melissa Miroslavich, family law, divorce education, financial planning after divorce, collaborative divorce

Transcripts

Speaker:

Welcome to Doing Divorce Different.

2

:

I'm happy to have you here,

and I'm so blessed to have

3

:

Melissa Mirles-Avich with me.

4

:

I love saying your last name.

5

:

It's like a hard one that

I actually think I get.

6

:

Speaker 2: You do.

7

:

You did a nice job.

8

:

Speaker: So, and here's the thing,

Melissa is an awesome attorney.

9

:

She works in Minnesota.

10

:

She does some family law.

11

:

She does estate planning.

12

:

Are you still doing family law, estate- I

13

:

Speaker 2: still do estate planning.

14

:

I do prenuptial agreements, so

that's the part of family law I do-

15

:

Yeah … pre-planning kinds of things-

Mm … and business succession planning.

16

:

Speaker: Yeah, which we really love

for today because I told Melissa I

17

:

wanted to have her on because I've

had some clients coming to me who have

18

:

questions on both sides of divorce, if

they wanna stay married or if they're

19

:

thinking about divorce, on how we

can protect the assets in a marriage.

20

:

And I'm gonna let Melissa kind of

take over and explain ways, and then

21

:

I'm gonna jump in with my scenarios

to see how this actually plays out.

22

:

So Melissa, welcome.

23

:

Thanks so much for being here.

24

:

Thanks for sharing all your

knowledge, because you have

25

:

a lot, and I appreciate you.

26

:

Speaker 2: Oh, thank you.

27

:

I'm happy, happy to be here.

28

:

Um, yeah, so protecting assets in a

marriage, um, I guess it depends on what

29

:

the end is for the marriage, like what

are we protecting them from or whom.

30

:

And so if you think about a marriage, um,

and a marriage ends in one of two ways.

31

:

It either ends in a divorce

or it ends in a death.

32

:

And so, you know, life happens and

things can get complicated, so one of

33

:

the ways that you can look at maybe,

um, when we're talking about things

34

:

like this, like a yours, ours and mine,

like yours and mine and ours assets,

35

:

in a marriage in Minnesota, a lot of

those assets are assumed to be ours.

36

:

And so when we're looking at a divorce,

for example, those, those, um, assets

37

:

that are considered ours by the statutes

tend to be broader than maybe what people

38

:

think, um, if they don't know that.

39

:

And so one of the ways that you can

sort of protect what is yours versus

40

:

ours or mine versus ours is actually

doing a prenup before you get married.

41

:

Speaker: Mm-hmm.

42

:

Speaker 2: Um, and that's a really, um,

important step that I like to do because I

43

:

feel like it makes a stronger relationship

and you also go in with your eyes wide

44

:

open, and there's a base understanding

of what could happen in either of those

45

:

scenarios, um, being death or divorce.

46

:

And so a prenuptial agreement can

say, "Hey, we like those laws and

47

:

we agree with them," and it sort of

stamps in time what you've brought to

48

:

the relationship and to the marriage.

49

:

Or you can say, "Hey, I

don't wanna do it that way.

50

:

My fiance doesn't wanna do it that way.

51

:

We wanna do it some other

way," and you can make your own

52

:

private agreement basically.

53

:

Um, there's lots of rules about how

those work to make them really strong

54

:

and valid, but that's one way to do it.

55

:

If you're already married- You

could do a postnuptial agreement.

56

:

A postnuptial agreement is saying, "Hey,

we're already married, but these are some

57

:

of the things that we're concerned about.

58

:

This is how we feel about

it now, and we don't…

59

:

We wanna do a yours, mine,

ours kind of scenario."

60

:

You can also do that after marriage.

61

:

There's, um, different rules

associated with that in Minnesota.

62

:

Um, the specific two that are important

probably is that you both would be

63

:

required to have an attorney, which

in my opinion makes a lot of sense,

64

:

because at that point in time, you have

spousal rights that you may be choosing

65

:

to give up, and you wanna know what

those rights are before you do that.

66

:

Um, and you also, um, once

you sign it, it's not actually

67

:

truly enforceable for two years.

68

:

So there is a period of time where you

can't just, like make an agreement,

69

:

and then a week later get divorced.

70

:

So that doesn't make sense.

71

:

So that's one of the protections that

the, the statutes have in place for you.

72

:

So post-nuptial agreements, prenuptial

agreements are great when we're

73

:

thinking about divorce scenarios.

74

:

Um, you can also handle death

scenarios in those kinds of

75

:

agreements, so those are super helpful.

76

:

And then when we're looking at

estates, um, there's ways that

77

:

you h- can waive your spousal

rights when it comes to an estate.

78

:

Um, and I will just say the longer you're

married, the more the, um, the statutes

79

:

would say as a spouse you are entitled to

if your, um, if your other spouse dies.

80

:

So, um, you can also waive those.

81

:

It's stronger if you have a prenup and

the waiver when you do the estate plan.

82

:

So those are some of the vehicles

that are available to you.

83

:

Speaker: Well, and I love that, and I

just wanna say for listeners, because

84

:

believe it or not, I have so many

clients that come to me and they say,

85

:

"Well, I'm just gonna keep my car.

86

:

He's gonna keep his,

and this is in my name.

87

:

We've, we've already

divided everything up."

88

:

And I think what they're not

understanding is, no you haven't.

89

:

You know what I mean?

90

:

In, especially in Minnesota,

Wisconsin I've worked in a little

91

:

bit too, um, what you own in that

marriage, you own together, and it

92

:

doesn't matter whose name is on it.

93

:

And so I think people…

94

:

That's why that prenup is so important.

95

:

I don't think people understand the, the

power of the, the bond of that marriage.

96

:

It's like starting a business

together, and that's why this is

97

:

so important to the listeners.

98

:

You need to know, um, that you've

got to set this up differently

99

:

if you want a different result.

100

:

Speaker 2: That is absolutely accurate.

101

:

Um, and in Minnesota, we, we have this,

sort of a short form of, um, saying

102

:

this, but if you own real estate,

you'll, you'll say you buy a house

103

:

together, um, in Minnesota you can buy

a property individually in a married-

104

:

if you're married, but you can't sell

it without your spouse's signature.

105

:

Mm-hmm.

106

:

So we call that one to buy, two

to sell, um, and that's something

107

:

that's very important in Minnesota,

and the reason for that is so that

108

:

spouses aren't just left high and

dry without a place to live, right?

109

:

Yeah.

110

:

Nothing can get sold out from under

you when it comes to property.

111

:

So different types of property

is handled differently.

112

:

Um, you know, and in a divorce you

can also come to agreements where

113

:

you might decide, like, your car's

your car, and my car's my car.

114

:

Speaker: Yes.

115

:

Speaker 2: Um, but as long

as you're agreeing, right?

116

:

It's the, it's when we don't agree that

things get really, um, long, involved,

117

:

exhausting, courts are involved, and

judges start making decisions for us.

118

:

Speaker: I'm glad that you said that,

too, because if you use mediation or

119

:

collaborative law, you can do this how

you want to as long as you're clear, and

120

:

I always kind of say state a reason why-

121

:

Speaker 2: Mm-hmm

122

:

… Speaker: you're doing it that

way, just so the judge knows,

123

:

like, "I know I'm not getting as

much, and this is why I want it."

124

:

You know what I mean?

125

:

I don't know.

126

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

127

:

This is why it felt equitable to me.

128

:

Speaker: Yes.

129

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

130

:

Speaker: Yeah.

131

:

Okay.

132

:

All right.

133

:

So let me ask you, I'm gonna ask you

about a particular case- Where I have

134

:

a couple, they have a lot, a kind of a

lot of assets, and they've been married

135

:

a long time, and they're divorcing.

136

:

Right.

137

:

And during their marriage, uh,

husband received a gift, an

138

:

inheritance that was just to him,

and we haven't talked about this.

139

:

We've said everything belongs to both

of you, except for non-marital property.

140

:

Speaker 2: Exactly.

141

:

We have the concept of marital property

and non-marital property in divorce.

142

:

That concept doesn't really

exist in death, by the way.

143

:

Um, we can make it exist, but

it doesn't really exist there.

144

:

Yeah, so that, that distinction between

marital property and non-marital property

145

:

becomes, like, the most important thing

if you're going through a divorce.

146

:

And a prenuptial agreement can really be

clear about what is, in fact, non-marital

147

:

property, which does not get split,

that's why that's important, versus

148

:

marital property, which does get split.

149

:

Speaker: And so in general, Melissa,

can we say that if you get a gift

150

:

or inheritance that's to you alone

and you don't mix it in with your

151

:

family, um, that can stay yours?

152

:

Or, like, if you had a 401before the

marriage, you can keep that portion of it?

153

:

Is that true?

154

:

Speaker 2: We start doing math.

155

:

Um, so yes, um, if you get an inheritance

and it is only to you, so the check

156

:

is literally to you, not to both

of you, then technically that would

157

:

be considered non-marital property.

158

:

But what you do with it is

really important, right?

159

:

So if I get a check and it's non-marital

property, it's an inheritance or a

160

:

gift from my long-lost cousin, and

I put it into my joint account, I've

161

:

now just basically gotten rid of the

non-marital property part of that

162

:

because of how I'm choosing to use it.

163

:

Or let's say I get, um, $100,000 'cause

somebody died and I put it into my own

164

:

account and I can show that this is what

I inherited, this is where I put it,

165

:

and I haven't used it in any other way.

166

:

I basically have to set up all the

dominoes, because in Minnesota, the

167

:

person who says something is non-marital

property has the burden of proving

168

:

that it's non-marital property.

169

:

Speaker: Okay.

170

:

Speaker 2: And if you remove

one of those dominoes, you lose

171

:

the non-marital property, like,

like, protection, basically.

172

:

Speaker: Right.

173

:

Okay.

174

:

Mm-hmm.

175

:

So this is, this is…

176

:

So I, back to my scenario.

177

:

Speaker 2: Okay.

178

:

Speaker: Went off on a tangent

on non-marital property.

179

:

So we've got this couple, he receives

an inheritance that is just to him.

180

:

He puts that in the tru- in a

trust, and in that trust, he

181

:

purchases a home in Arizona.

182

:

that the family uses.

183

:

I mean, I asked this and they said, uh,

and, and the wife is, is, is even like,

184

:

"Oh no, the, the financial planner said

that's his 'cause he put it in a trust."

185

:

And I said, "I don't know if that's

necessarily true if he's using it."

186

:

The wife and daughter go

there and vacation there.

187

:

I mean, I think he's kinda

living there more now.

188

:

Speaker 2: Sure.

189

:

Speaker: Um, but is that, is that

a way to keep your money safe from

190

:

your spouse when you inherit it,

just by putting it in a trust?

191

:

Speaker 2: Not necessarily, no.

192

:

Um

193

:

Speaker: Let's talk, let's

dive into that a little bit.

194

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

195

:

So, um, I guess the first question I

would ask is what kind of a trust is it?

196

:

Because there's lots of

different kinds of trusts.

197

:

Mm-hmm.

198

:

So, um, if you set up what's

called a revocable trust, um,

199

:

versus an irrevocable trust is what

we're gonna kinda dive into here.

200

:

Um, 'cause when I s- when I hear

the word trust, I start thinking,

201

:

"Okay, well, what, what…

202

:

Who created the trust?

203

:

What's in the trust?

204

:

When was it created?"

205

:

Those are the questions

I start to ask myself.

206

:

Um, so to make it very simplified, if

you have a revocable trust, which is a

207

:

tool we use a lot in estate planning,

quite frankly, because it helps you

208

:

avoid probate and it has other benefits.

209

:

If it's revocable, I think about it

as, um, you kind of own a shed in your

210

:

backyard, and you can put things into that

shed, and you can take things out of that

211

:

shed, and you have the keys to the shed.

212

:

So you are in full control of the

assets that are in the revocable

213

:

trust and what you do with them.

214

:

Um, you can also change that trust.

215

:

You, you, you maintain holding the keys.

216

:

You're in charge.

217

:

Versus something called

an irrevocable trust.

218

:

An irrevocable trust is not

like the shed in your backyard.

219

:

It is basically like when

you go to deposit a letter.

220

:

Do people still write letters?

221

:

Um- I do.

222

:

And you go to the mailbox that's

not your personal mailbox.

223

:

Maybe that's a better analogy.

224

:

It's not my personal mailbox, it's

just the mailbox by the gas station

225

:

or whatever, and I put things into it.

226

:

I can't get them back.

227

:

I'm not in control of it anymore.

228

:

Somebody else is.

229

:

That's more what an irrevocable trust is.

230

:

So we might set up assets

in an irrevocable trust.

231

:

I might be the one

who's feeding the trust.

232

:

I might be the one who created

it, but I'm not in charge of it.

233

:

I don't have the keys.

234

:

I can't make changes.

235

:

It's really not mine anymore.

236

:

It's really owned now by the trust itself.

237

:

And the reason people do

that, 'cause you're like, "Why

238

:

would you give up control?"

239

:

Um, is because they're

looking for protection, right?

240

:

So maybe we want protection from

creditors, or we want protection

241

:

for, um, somebody in our family,

or maybe we want a tax benefit.

242

:

So, uh, Minnesota has estate taxes.

243

:

Not every state does that, um, but

we do, and one of the tools that

244

:

we can use to minimize somebody's

estate or make it smaller is to

245

:

remove assets from the estate and

put them in an irrevocable trust.

246

:

It's no longer counted

towards your estate.

247

:

So there's reasons people

would do an irrevocable trust.

248

:

If you get an inheritance from a parent

and they want you to be able to have

249

:

benefit from that trust as a beneficiary,

but they don't want you to have control

250

:

over it, um, that would be a way to

sort of separate out those assets.

251

:

And they're no- they're not really yours

until you get them as a beneficiary.

252

:

Does that make sense?

253

:

Speaker: Yeah.

254

:

Okay, so in my scenario,

I don't know for sure.

255

:

I don't know for sure if

it was an irrevocable.

256

:

If it was irrevocable, though, how would

he have used it to purchase a home?

257

:

Speaker 2: That would be very dependent

on the language in the trust itself.

258

:

Okay.

259

:

So this is now where you do a

deep dive into, like, have an

260

:

attorney look at the tr- the trust

document and say, "What is allowed?

261

:

What isn't allowed?"

262

:

But if he has control over those

assets, I would be surprised, um,

263

:

that he is, um the, the trustee or the

g- the person who created the trust.

264

:

Like, you, once it goes

into an irrevocable trust,

265

:

you lose control, right?

266

:

Um, so that would be a great area for me,

and I would want a question about that.

267

:

Okay.

268

:

Because if it's a revocable trust, we

haven't protect- protected the assets

269

:

from the yours, ours, mine, marital

property, non-marital property at all.

270

:

It's- Right … you,

you're in control of it.

271

:

Um, irrevocable would be like,

it's not part of my estate.

272

:

I don't have access to it.

273

:

I can't get the money out of it.

274

:

That seems like a scenario where you might

be like, "Okay, so what's really going on

275

:

with that particular irrevocable trust?"

276

:

Because just because you have

one, doesn't mean that it's not

277

:

considered marital property.

278

:

So, that doesn't just

automatically protect you.

279

:

Okay.

280

:

So, let's say somebody knows they're

getting divorced, and they're planning

281

:

it out, you know, three years in advance

or something, and they go create this

282

:

irrevocable trust during the marriage,

depends on what money they used.

283

:

Um, because a court might look

at that and say, "Yeah, that's,

284

:

that feels wrong," right?

285

:

That just hits wrong, and so you, you

might not be able to access that money,

286

:

but you still might have to cover off

the marital portion of that money-

287

:

Speaker: Mm-hmm

288

:

… Speaker 2: and, um, and divide

it equally anyway, even if

289

:

you can't access it directly.

290

:

Speaker: Yeah.

291

:

Speaker 2: It's gonna

be very case specific.

292

:

Speaker: Okay.

293

:

And so I like that, and so I feel

like in that situation, absolutely the

294

:

wife should have someone on her behalf

looking at that trust and the wording,

295

:

um, to know what her rights are.

296

:

Speaker 2: For sure.

297

:

Yeah.

298

:

Speaker: Yeah.

299

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

300

:

I mean, if…

301

:

I would always say, if

it doesn't feel like…

302

:

I always start with this, what

does this feel like to me?

303

:

Like, what's happening?

304

:

And that first question

is, who set up the trust?

305

:

Who's in charge of it?

306

:

Who has access to it?

307

:

What's in it?

308

:

Where did that asset come from?

309

:

When did it happen?

310

:

Was it pre-marriage, after marriage?

311

:

All of those factors are gonna

play into- Yeah … whether that

312

:

asset is now considered marital

property or non-marital property.

313

:

Speaker: That, that's, that was

my thinking, and it was during

314

:

the marriage, so to be determined.

315

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

316

:

What I'll say is this, a, a judge

would not just assume that- Mm

317

:

they're not gonna ignore the asset, right?

318

:

They're gonna question it, they're

gonna look at it, they're gonna ask

319

:

similar questions to what I asked, which

is very different from what the IRS

320

:

does, just in case you're wondering.

321

:

Speaker: Good

322

:

Speaker 2: to know.

323

:

You know?

324

:

Good to know.

325

:

They're more like a creditor, right?

326

:

So- Different strokes for different folks.

327

:

Speaker: Right.

328

:

Right, right, right.

329

:

Okay, okay, that's super helpful.

330

:

You're helping me out, you're

helping the listeners out.

331

:

Now, I have a different scenario,

and interestingly enough, I'm helping

332

:

someone r- right now through this, and

this isn't the first time, so I feel

333

:

like, well, there might be some other

listeners who are going through this.

334

:

So, I'm gonna tell you, in the past, I had

a lovely couple, they w- had been married

335

:

a long time, and he had an addiction

problem, and they came to me because

336

:

he was afraid- If he lost it again,

he would spend all the money, and he

337

:

wanted to take care of her and his kids.

338

:

And he was, he was gone for, I don't

know, three years, and she didn't see

339

:

him, and he spent a bunch of money.

340

:

And they loved each other, but he just

had a really … So he was in a great

341

:

place when they came and they worked

with me, and we did do a divorce for them

342

:

even though they kind of stayed together.

343

:

And that way she was able to separate

out the finances and she was safe.

344

:

And gall darn it, I talked to her

later and he did lose it again and

345

:

was gone, and so we were so thankful.

346

:

So, you know, let's fast-forward

to just recently I've got a

347

:

young couple kind of in the same

scenario, and I feel protective, a

348

:

little protective of mom and kids.

349

:

Um, and she doesn't wanna get divorced.

350

:

She has hope.

351

:

And so we're trying to look at,

and I've, I've trying to come up

352

:

with ideas like, okay, you could…

353

:

I mean, you can always get

divorced and stay together.

354

:

That's one option.

355

:

Speaker 2: Mm-hmm.

356

:

Speaker: You can do a legal separation.

357

:

Mm-hmm.

358

:

Um, and that the laws are a little bit

different in Minnesota and Wisconsin.

359

:

Um, you c- she, she was wondering

if there's any way you could

360

:

set up some kind of a contract.

361

:

I believe that would be a postnuptial.

362

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

363

:

Speaker: Can you speak to

what her options might be?

364

:

And his.

365

:

He's in this with her right now.

366

:

Yeah.

367

:

He feels the same way.

368

:

He doesn't want a divorce, but he wants

her protected because he knows it's scary.

369

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

370

:

I mean, I feel like you're kind

of hitting the nail on the head of

371

:

what the three options would be.

372

:

So you have the, the first option…

373

:

Well, let me, let me give you

worst-case scenario first option, right?

374

:

Um, and I will do this

from my own experience.

375

:

So, um, I did practice family law.

376

:

I chose to focus on estate planning,

but, um, I did have a client who, um,

377

:

spouse had an addiction, and they were

together, I wanna say, 20, 20 plus

378

:

maybe, 20 plus years, enough for the

kids to, like, be out of the house-ish.

379

:

Mm-hmm.

380

:

And, um, at that point in time, we did

a divorce, and, and lots of assets had

381

:

been misused and, um, there's things

that you can fight about when there's

382

:

misuse of marital assets and things

like that, but that, again, that's

383

:

expensive and drawn out, and nobody really

wanted that in this particular case.

384

:

And, um, for me, um, in the attorney

role at that point, it was really

385

:

hard because I felt for the situation.

386

:

Um, everybody's concerned and

is worried about the money.

387

:

There's no getting the money back

once it's gone, to be honest with you.

388

:

Mm-hmm.

389

:

Like, that's not possible.

390

:

And in Minnesota, we're a no-fault

state, so we can't say, "We're divorcing

391

:

because of your infidelity," or- Yeah

392

:

"We're divorcing because of your

addiction," or whatever the…

393

:

So those, those are out

the window, and so…

394

:

And there's good reasons for that.

395

:

I'm not against that at all.

396

:

Um, but it was kind of a, kind of a tough

cookie situation because her choice was

397

:

to stay even though she knew that this

was happening, and he had periods where it

398

:

was great and periods, periods where there

was relapse and everything in between.

399

:

And so that's a hard pill

to swallow, I'll just say.

400

:

Um, but that is the pill that you

sort of swallow at that point.

401

:

Mm-hmm.

402

:

Um, another option would be to say,

"Okay- We're both in a good place.

403

:

We really, um, do wanna protect

the assets, and how do we do that?

404

:

I would be looking at a postnuptial

agreement, um, in that scenario, which

405

:

is basically, it's kind of like a

prenuptial agreement, but you basically

406

:

sit down with each other and you say,

"Okay, here's the assets that we have.

407

:

I'm going to start shifting assets

and saying that they're non-marital

408

:

property, and putting them in the

spouse that isn't ha- struggling with,

409

:

uh, chemical health issues, and start

separating those out so that we are able

410

:

to protect the more of the assets, let's

say, um, in the case of a divorce."

411

:

Um, one of the benefits of that is that

you get a nice, clear picture of what

412

:

the assets are and the liabilities.

413

:

We do both, because you have

to have full disclosure of the

414

:

financials in that situation.

415

:

Um, and once you sign that on the

dotted line in Minnesota, it takes a

416

:

couple years, um, to actually make it

enforceable, but you could also make an

417

:

argument that it's enforceable before

the two years, but you'd have to prove

418

:

it and you'd have to win that argument.

419

:

Um, I also think- Oh,

420

:

Speaker: it takes two years for that.

421

:

I…

422

:

Okay, I did see that, which

may not be great in this

423

:

scenario right at the moment.

424

:

We don't really wanna wait two years.

425

:

Okay.

426

:

Speaker 2: Well, you have to sign it,

and then you've got two years before

427

:

it, before it's basically, like, a-

Uh-huh … assumed to be enforceable.

428

:

So there's a period of time where it's

not, and that is really meant for the

429

:

benefit of the people who are part of this

process, because if you're doing, um, if

430

:

you're making marital property non-marital

property, 'cause remember, you're

431

:

already married, so the rights exist.

432

:

You have them.

433

:

You're not…

434

:

In a prenuptial agreement, you're not

married yet, so you're not giving up

435

:

something that you already have, you're

giving up something that you could have.

436

:

But in a marriage, you might be giving up

things that you already have rights to.

437

:

And so, um, so there is this

sort of period of time where it's

438

:

not assumed to be enforceable.

439

:

You could argue if you were in

court that it is for a bunch of

440

:

reasons, and I don't know if you

would win that argument or not.

441

:

Um, that's very dependent

on the situation, obviously.

442

:

Speaker: Okay.

443

:

So that, that doesn't sound like a

great option in the situation with

444

:

addiction, where you don't know timing.

445

:

Um, so it's good to know that that is…

446

:

You know, and I think I know, like,

people who have done postnups are,

447

:

they're maybe starting a business.

448

:

Mm-hmm.

449

:

You know what I mean?

450

:

And they have a partner, and so

they, they work that all out.

451

:

I get that, and I understand the two year.

452

:

That makes complete sense, you know,

because someone is giving up their rights.

453

:

Okay.

454

:

So kind of sounds like a separation

or a divorce- Might just be the option

455

:

Speaker 2: That's probably

the most protected, right?

456

:

Because you do, when you have a

divorce or a legal separation,

457

:

you are separating assets, right?

458

:

So, and that's, that's a completed

transaction, if you will.

459

:

So, once a divorce is finalized and

it's effectuated, like, the assets

460

:

are going to the person they're

supposed to go to, and based on the

461

:

agreement that the parties make or

what the judge tells you or whatever.

462

:

Um, so that's probably the strongest,

right, way to protect financial assets.

463

:

Um, with a postnuptial agreement, we do

have this wiggle room of time before the

464

:

presumption is that it's enforceable.

465

:

Um, in addition to that, I would

also be looking at, in an estate

466

:

plan, um, you know, with addiction,

there is possibilities for overdoses

467

:

and all, all those kinds of things,

so we start talking about death.

468

:

Um, depending on how the estate plan

is set up, I do know that there are

469

:

people who are concerned if the person

who doesn't have the chemical health

470

:

issue dies first, and the person who

does have the chemical health issue dies

471

:

second, they've inherited potentially

the whole estate, depending on how long

472

:

you've been married, and the family

dynamics, and kids, and all of that stuff.

473

:

But, um, but that's, that's a scary

scenario too, and so lots of times people

474

:

will make a plan for in the case of

death, what's happening with these assets.

475

:

In Minnesota, your spouse has a certain

level of rights to- Mm-hmm … the

476

:

assets of the estate, and so you

can work your way around that.

477

:

One of the ways to do that is to do a

combination of a postnuptial agreement,

478

:

as well as waivers and consent to what we

call in Minnesota is your elective share.

479

:

So a spouse gets a certain amount.

480

:

The longer you're

married, the more you get.

481

:

Um, and lots of spouses just give

everything to each other, so m-

482

:

most people, it's not necessarily on

their radar that that's what happens.

483

:

But there is, um, an elective

share component to this that

484

:

you could waive your rights to.

485

:

But you would wanna sign

waivers, show consent.

486

:

Like, you want it documented

that that's what's happening.

487

:

Speaker: Okay, so you're kind

of saying that for if you

488

:

take the postnuptial route.

489

:

So now let's just clarify too for

the listeners, if you get a legal

490

:

separation or a divorce, and you

separate those assets and, oops, you

491

:

had a will and you forgot about it, does

that null after you've been divorced?

492

:

Speaker 2: So in Minnesota, we have

laws that say with divorce, the day that

493

:

judgment decree is signed by the court,

that there's a severance, basically.

494

:

We're severing the role of spouse.

495

:

And so even if you named your spouse

as your beneficiary in your will,

496

:

if you are divorced, as of the date

of the divorce, spouse is no longer

497

:

eligible, uh, to be the inheritor, or

your personal representative, or your

498

:

trustee, or your power of attorney.

499

:

So there's an automatic moment

in time where those are severed.

500

:

Um, since I do estate planning and I'm

very much about proactive thinking, I

501

:

will say even though that sever- that

severs automatically, I think it's

502

:

really important to make sure you pick

the people you want, because we'll just

503

:

go down the line and who was next, and

maybe it was your spouse's brother, and

504

:

that's no longer appropriate, right?

505

:

So, um, or maybe it is.

506

:

I actually have, um, lots…

507

:

I've had several, especially in the

collaborative process, people who

508

:

are divorced and their spouse has

been severed from those roles, and

509

:

they still want them in those roles.

510

:

Speaker: Mm-hmm.

511

:

Speaker 2: So when you talk to me about

people who are divorced but are actually

512

:

still together and, um, and they still,

um, like the protections and the person

513

:

would make good decisions for them, I

will, after the divorce severs their role,

514

:

I will go and reinstate them sometimes.

515

:

Speaker: Yeah.

516

:

Speaker 2: Maybe not as often as other

cases, but it does happen occasionally.

517

:

Speaker: And especially in collaborative

law and mediations where people

518

:

are working together, which I

think is the best way if you can.

519

:

Mm-hmm.

520

:

Um, and then I just wanna add one

other piece- When you get divorced,

521

:

and if you have beneficiaries set up

for, like, life insurance, does that

522

:

automatically sever, or would that still

523

:

Speaker 2: go to the ex?

524

:

We always need to check our beneficiaries.

525

:

Let's just do that, okay?

526

:

Like, rule of thumb, let's just

check the beneficiaries, because we

527

:

do get into, like, wow, that could

be an interesting argument, right?

528

:

Or an interesting fight.

529

:

So, once…

530

:

But just to be clear, in Minnesota,

if you're in a divorce process

531

:

You cannot change your beneficiary

designations, that's not allowed,

532

:

um, unless everybody agrees.

533

:

After the divorce, then you can.

534

:

So there's that, that time period

where you have to be careful.

535

:

One of the benefits of doing a prenup,

since we did mention them earlier, is that

536

:

you can change that rule for yourself.

537

:

Right.

538

:

So in lots of prenups that I do, I…

539

:

We s- we change the date.

540

:

We don't say, "You can't change

your beneficiary designations until

541

:

the divorce is finalized," we say,

"If it's started, you can change

542

:

your beneficiary designation."

543

:

So there's, there's lots of different

nuances to the prenup that people

544

:

can benefit from, even if they agree

with how things would get separated.

545

:

Speaker: Right.

546

:

And I just…

547

:

Okay, so and ano- a point I was

trying to make, though, is that if

548

:

you get divorced and you have your

spouse as the beneficiary of, like,

549

:

your life insurance, and then you

die, it goes to your spouse, correct?

550

:

Speaker 2: Let's change that, yeah.

551

:

Speaker: Yes.

552

:

Speaker 2: Yeah.

553

:

Speaker: So-

554

:

Speaker 2: And there's no-

555

:

Speaker: So the will ends,

but not the- There's no…

556

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, so the, the

statutes will end it for wills,

557

:

trusts, powers of attorney,

executor roles, that kind of stuff.

558

:

But those beneficiary designations,

when you're working with

559

:

big companies, those are…

560

:

They're great tools, because they

keep you out of probate court.

561

:

But, um, yeah, we need to change

those beneficiary designations.

562

:

Yeah.

563

:

When it's appropriate to do so.

564

:

Speaker: So much to think about.

565

:

That's why- Yeah … I mean,

I gotta tell you, I love AI.

566

:

I love it.

567

:

I use it every day.

568

:

But I have had people coming to me

and thinking they know everything.

569

:

It's just hard.

570

:

You do need a little bit of help a

lot, or, you know, just get informed

571

:

on what you need to do as best you can,

'cause there is so m- I mean, this,

572

:

I'm like, okay, we're at our time now.

573

:

Like, and I feel like I thought

this was gonna be a quick little…

574

:

You know?

575

:

But these are really in-depth

things, and I'm so thankful.

576

:

You clarified things.

577

:

I learned.

578

:

Yeah.

579

:

This is gonna help my listeners,

so I so appreciate you.

580

:

I know I'm gonna have you back on-

Great … 'cause I love having you.

581

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, I'd love to be back.

582

:

Hopefully we sh- shed some light

a- at least to, to know that

583

:

there's, like, things you can do.

584

:

Um, I don't think there's a,

a solid best-fits-everybody

585

:

answer to that question.

586

:

I think there's a lot based on the

individual circumstances, which is

587

:

one of the reasons I like working with

families, 'cause everybody has their

588

:

own things that they bring to the table.

589

:

Right.

590

:

Yeah, so.

591

:

Speaker: Yeah.

592

:

It's good.

593

:

And so I would highly recommend you to

my listeners if they're in Minnesota.

594

:

Speaker 2: Yeah, mm-hmm.

595

:

Speaker: And we'll have your,

um, contact in the show notes.

596

:

Okay, great.

597

:

But otherwise, it's Melissa Miroslavich.

598

:

How can they reach you?

599

:

Speaker 2: They can go miroslavichlaw.com

600

:

if they can spell it, but it'll be

601

:

Speaker: right there.

602

:

I'll have it in the show notes too.

603

:

But if you're thinking, "Oh, I'm getting

married, I wanna talk about the prenup,"

604

:

or if you're thinking about, even just

thinking about divorce, I don't think

605

:

it's a bad idea to touch base with

you to find out, okay, how is this…

606

:

What do I need to be thinking of?

607

:

Because sometimes, darn it,

that family law attorney isn't

608

:

always remembering those things.

609

:

Speaker 2: That's true.

610

:

So- That's true.

611

:

Well- Yeah.

612

:

Speaker: Well.

613

:

It's

614

:

Speaker 2: true.

615

:

Absolutely.

616

:

Speaker: All right.

617

:

Well, Melissa, thank you.

618

:

I appreciate you.

619

:

Thanks so much for being here.

620

:

Speaker 2: Thanks for having me.

621

:

It's good to see you again.

622

:

Bye, Lisa.

623

:

Yes,

624

:

Speaker: you take care.

Follow

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube