Artwork for podcast Be Encouraged with Bishop Julius C. Trimble
Moving Forward: Bishop Trimble and Rev. Dr. Mark Holland from MainStream UMC.com on Post-Conflict United Methodist Church following General Conference
Episode 10729th May 2024 • Be Encouraged with Bishop Julius C. Trimble • Bishop Julius C. Trimble
00:00:00 00:43:00

Share Episode

Shownotes

Bishop Julius C. Trimble is the Resident Bishop of the Indiana Area of the United Methodist Church.

Bishop Trimble has the personal mission to encourage all people with the love of Jesus Christ to rise to their highest potential. It is his commitment to his personal mission that led Bishop Trimble to create the “To Be Encouraged” Podcast along with co-host Rev.Dr. Brad Miller.

Bishop Trimble says, “I am compelled by Jesus to share with you an encouraging word or two about Jesus, theology, the Bible, the pandemic, the environment, racism, voting rights, human sexuality, and the state of the United Methodist Church.”

To Be Encouraged with Bishop Julius C. Trimble is to be published weekly and is available at www.tobeencouraged.com and all the podcast directories.

https://www.inumc.org/bishop/office-of-the-bishop/

On Episode 107

**Episode Title: Moving Forward: Bishop Trimble and Rev. Dr. Mark Holland from MainStream UMC.com on Post-Conflict United Methodist Church following General Conference

**Podcast: To Be Encouraged**

**Host: Rev. Dr. Brad Miller**

**Guests: Bishop Julius C. Trimble, Rev. Dr. Mark Holland**

In this insightful episode of "To Be Encouraged," host Rev. Dr. Brad Miller welcomes two distinguished guests, Bishop Julius C. Trimble and Rev. Dr. Mark Holland, Executive Director of Mainstream UMC. The discussion dives deep into pivotal issues facing the United Methodist Church (UMC), such as regionalization, disaffiliation, and the church’s mission moving forward. Here are three key takeaways from this episode:

### 1. **Optimism Amid Change and Challenges**

Bishop Julius C. Trimble shares an optimistic vision for the future of the United Methodist Church. He emphasizes that the church has successfully navigated the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which he believes were more daunting than the ongoing debates over human sexuality. Bishop Trimble highlights the resilience and steadfastness of the church, encouraging the community to seize this moment to share love broadly and continue the mission of making disciples. His excitement for meeting young pastors and witnessing the continued commitment to God's call is palpable, demonstrating his hope and encouragement for the UMC’s future.

### 2. **Fundamental Shifts: Regionalization and Disaffiliation**

Rev. Dr. Mark Holland explores the significant outcomes from the recent General Conference, particularly focusing on the topics of regionalization and the end of church disaffiliation. One of the historic changes discussed is the overwhelming support for regionalization, which saw a 78% approval rate at the General Conference. This move allows different regions to navigate their distinct contexts while remaining united under the same church umbrella. Additionally, the decision to stop allowing churches to disaffiliate marks a deliberate effort to cease divisions and conflicts within the UMC, fostering a more united and inclusive community.

### 3. **Removal of Discriminatory Language**

Both guests express a strong commitment to progressive change within the United Methodist Church. One of the landmark decisions discussed is the removal of harmful and discriminatory language from the church’s Book of Discipline. This change signifies a step toward inclusivity and neutrality, eliminating language that has caused marginalization while striving to keep the church’s teachings relevant and compassionate. The conversation notes that there was broad consensus and substantial support for this shift, reflecting a collective move towards a more just and affirming faith community.

### Closing Reflection

The episode wraps up with a moving prayer from Bishop Trimble and a heartfelt reminder from Rev. Dr. Brad Miller to always do good. The dialogue throughout this episode is infused with hope and a clear vision for a more unified and inclusive United Methodist Church, making it a must-listen for anyone invested in the future of their faith community.

**Tune in to "To Be Encouraged" for more inspiring discussions and reflections on faith, love, and the journey ahead for the United Methodist Church.**

https://mainstreamumc.com/

Transcripts

Speaker:

Hello again, good people, and welcome to this episode of the

Speaker:

to be encouraged podcast with Bishop

Speaker:

Julius c Trimble. It's the podcast we look to offer an

Speaker:

encouraging word to an often discouraged

Speaker:

world. A main focus in the United Methodist Church over the

Speaker:

last several years, but particularly in April May

Speaker:

of 2024 was general conference. It was a 2020

Speaker:

general conference advanced to 2024, and there's a whole story about

Speaker:

that that we won't get into details. But it was all about, dealing with

Speaker:

some significant matters in the life of the church, which have caused some great

Speaker:

angst over many years and to find some resolution to

Speaker:

those. And, that meant the advocacy groups have stepped

Speaker:

forward to advocate for various positions. One of those advocacy groups

Speaker:

is mainstream UMC. C may you can find it at mainstream

Speaker:

u umc.com. Their exec their executive

Speaker:

director, the reverend doctor Mark Holland is Bishop,

Speaker:

Trimble and my guest here today on this episode of To Be

Speaker:

Encouraged. Bishop, would you help us welcome reverend doctor Mark Holland to our

Speaker:

podcast? Well, thank you, Mark, for being with us

Speaker:

today and for your leadership in your local

Speaker:

community in United Methodist Church and certainly, your

Speaker:

voice via mainstream UMC. Glad to have

Speaker:

you. Thank you, Bishop. It's an honor to be here. Thank you, Brad.

Speaker:

Absolutely. Well, well, Mark, the the the mission of

Speaker:

matriarchy of C is a is to work for the unity of the body of

Speaker:

Christ. And we do know that in the last several years,

Speaker:

there's been a fair amount of disunity in the body of Christ in the United

Speaker:

Methodist Church, and yet we came together at general conference

Speaker:

of 2020 and the 24 24 to try to come

Speaker:

to some resolution regarding this matter or regarding

Speaker:

some areas. But I'd be interested to hear a little bit about your your take,

Speaker:

your vibe, kind of about the overall tone of the conference, and I know Bishop

Speaker:

will have some a few more, pertinent questions for you.

Speaker:

Well, I I think the biggest the biggest thing we saw we saw this

Speaker:

at our annual conferences last year in the United States. We saw it at the

Speaker:

jurisdictional conferences in 2022. We've seen it in

Speaker:

Europe and the Philippines where there's been a consensus about

Speaker:

moving towards regionalization and moving to live together

Speaker:

in disagreement. And I think that the folks who could not

Speaker:

live together in disagreement for whom, you know,

Speaker:

homosexuality is an existential crisis for them, went ahead

Speaker:

and left. And I think for the rest of us who gathered,

Speaker:

there's been a real sense of consensus that we're just not gonna agree on

Speaker:

anything. And it's like we do with our families, Mercy. If our families had to

Speaker:

agree on everything, we wouldn't have Thanksgiving done. We wouldn't get together

Speaker:

for Christmas and Easter. We wouldn't have family reunions or 4th

Speaker:

July. The reality is in order to

Speaker:

live together in civil society, we have to get along with disagreement.

Speaker:

And so we really saw that consensus developing. What we didn't know is if that

Speaker:

consensus would carry over to general conference, and it did. And I think it's

Speaker:

it's remarkable. One of the things I've said both in secular

Speaker:

politics and in church politics, if you're working just to win,

Speaker:

you're working for 50% plus 1, and you fail,

Speaker:

you fall back to logjam. And that's where Washington C is, and that's

Speaker:

where our church has been. But if you're working for consensus

Speaker:

and you fall back you can't quite get there, you fall back to majority,

Speaker:

a majority that people can live with. And so what we saw at general

Speaker:

conference I mean, my highest and best hope for removing the language is

Speaker:

53% based on our number counting, while we

Speaker:

got 60, 70% for removing the language, not

Speaker:

because everyone agrees with removing the language, but because people are in a

Speaker:

place where we can live with difference. The same

Speaker:

thing with regionalization. I thought it was a coin flip that we passed

Speaker:

regionalization, and we passed it

Speaker:

with 78%. And even if everyone who hadn't

Speaker:

been there was present and voting against it, it still would have passed

Speaker:

because there's a consensus in the United Methodist Church right now that we wanna live

Speaker:

together for the global mission. And it was powerful and

Speaker:

palpable to feel that consensus emerge through the

Speaker:

2 weeks in the legislative process compared to how it's been. I've

Speaker:

been a delegate or an alternate since 2000, and it has

Speaker:

been a toxic environment of division and

Speaker:

political wrangling and maneuvering. This was different, and it

Speaker:

was it was refreshing. Bishop, would you be in agreement about this sense of

Speaker:

a consensus? And what's your take on what, what Mark has shared

Speaker:

here? I think he's spot on. I I I I had to

Speaker:

come back and apologize to our cabinet about general conference

Speaker:

because I said prior to this, I said general conference tend tends to

Speaker:

be overrated. I was wrong because this this general

Speaker:

conference was not overrated. And I often said that, you know,

Speaker:

most significant change will happen outside of general conference, but I

Speaker:

think there was sea change in the United Methodist Church,

Speaker:

us moving to what several bishops refer to, but others

Speaker:

refer to as a post conflict church. Yeah. So I

Speaker:

thought there was consensus, but, also, what we like to lift up here

Speaker:

in Indiana, you know, there was a real opportunity for Christian conferencing.

Speaker:

And I saw that in several several places. So,

Speaker:

as Mark pointed out, even if the people that were not able to

Speaker:

make it there had made it there and, say, 75% of them voted

Speaker:

in in opposition to what passed, it still would have passed. So

Speaker:

I think the church is the church is at a different place. Obviously,

Speaker:

some of that's related to those who have already left

Speaker:

because as as Mark said, it couldn't be in a family where there was

Speaker:

significant live with significant disagreement. So I thought it

Speaker:

was a great conference, and it wasn't overrated. In fact, it,

Speaker:

if anything, it over delivered on what I expected. And like Mark,

Speaker:

I I was on the host committee in 2000 in Cleveland and

Speaker:

have been to general conference ever since then.

Speaker:

And it was the first time there was a conference where there wasn't disruption in

Speaker:

the plenary itself. There were protests particularly

Speaker:

around Gaza in the hallways and outside. I participated

Speaker:

in outside protests. But but there there

Speaker:

was there was a sense that that people who love The United Methodist Church,

Speaker:

love Jesus, wanted to see the church transition

Speaker:

to a post conflict church. Not to say that we there's gonna be no

Speaker:

conflict, but where conflict is not the number one thing on

Speaker:

the agenda. Well, Mark, your

Speaker:

mainstream UMC is an advocacy C, and so you worked hard

Speaker:

to advocate for several positions here entering general conference. And

Speaker:

you just indicated a second ago that there was some anxiety, but I was gonna

Speaker:

go, you know, in terms of the actual votes and so on.

Speaker:

Let's just break them down for a few minutes here. Let's break down

Speaker:

the 5 the 3 biggies as far as I'm concerned or my understanding, you

Speaker:

know, regionalization, removing a harmful language, and

Speaker:

stopping disaffiliations. There may be other things we wanna talk about, but really want

Speaker:

us to touch on those. So let's just start those kind of in the

Speaker:

order we I just mentioned them. Let's just track the the

Speaker:

regionalization issue, how it was going in the general

Speaker:

conference, how it played out during the conference, and what are kinda

Speaker:

little bit what the, impact or the aftermath

Speaker:

of the vote will be moving forward. Well,

Speaker:

the the biggest issue other than the other two issues, removing the harmful language

Speaker:

and the stopping disaffiliation, both required

Speaker:

only a majority vote. We were confident going in we had the majority

Speaker:

of based on our number counting from 2019 and

Speaker:

changes in voting and who is present, we were confident we had

Speaker:

those votes. The but only to the height of 53%,

Speaker:

honestly. That's that's about where that would be our highest

Speaker:

watermark if we had reached that. It could have been much closer.

Speaker:

But the the big thing about regionalization, it takes a 2 thirds vote. And you

Speaker:

don't get to 2 thirds if there's not a consensus. And all 5

Speaker:

jurisdictions in the US had voted aspirationally in 2022 to

Speaker:

support regionalization. The Philippines annual conferences, many of

Speaker:

them had voted aspirationally to support regionalization as had

Speaker:

conferences in Europe. The group we hadn't heard from, it was from

Speaker:

Africa, and that's about a third of the delegates. Now we heard a lot of

Speaker:

the Bishop saying in Africa that they were open to it.

Speaker:

But because of the communication gap, we couldn't

Speaker:

talk directly to many of the African delegates. 1, we didn't

Speaker:

know who they were. 2, the general conference used to publish

Speaker:

contact information and have stopped doing that. I think the lawyers

Speaker:

said you can't do that anymore, which we need to have people sign a disclaimer.

Speaker:

I think people need to put contact information on. They're an

Speaker:

elected official, frankly, and their own their own annual

Speaker:

conference should be able to But that's a whole another issue. But

Speaker:

Sure. We we weren't able to get deep enough into the delegations in

Speaker:

Africa to really know what was gonna happen. And what we learned was

Speaker:

there was a there's a consensus in Africa for regionalization

Speaker:

and significant. And that was the biggest,

Speaker:

the most pleasant surprise. And even after the

Speaker:

language was removed and even after the regionalization

Speaker:

passed, to hear some of the very traditional I mean, all of the bishops in

Speaker:

Africa are very traditional. I mean, not even kinda traditional. They're all very traditional.

Speaker:

You hear several of them, the very traditional bishops in Africa

Speaker:

saying, we saw what happened at general conference. We're committed to remaining

Speaker:

United Methodist. We're committed to regionalization. That is

Speaker:

the most endearing part of it. So I thought it was a

Speaker:

coin flip if it would pass. I was very skeptical it would be ratified because

Speaker:

now every annual conference has to vote, and the aggregate of that vote has to

Speaker:

reach 2 thirds. It's not 2 thirds of annual conferences. It's

Speaker:

2 thirds of all the members of annual. That's a very different number. So

Speaker:

I am more encouraged that ratification can occur. I do think we need to work

Speaker:

for it. My experience politically is things don't happen magically, but

Speaker:

you need to advocate and help message. So

Speaker:

I do think it's there, but I I think the the possibility is

Speaker:

there, and I feel a lot better about it following this vote.

Speaker:

And Bishop Bishop, would you be react to that? It sounds like it was kind

Speaker:

of a serendipitous type of, moment. The result, you know, just

Speaker:

a a god thing, if you will, that it did occur. But your your take

Speaker:

on what Mark just shared there about, regionalization,

Speaker:

how it played out. I concur I concur with what everything Mark has said.

Speaker:

I think one of the un unreported stories of general

Speaker:

conference is the fact that and there

Speaker:

was vocal vocal, confirmation of this

Speaker:

that many of the African delegates and certainly many of the bishops, and I've

Speaker:

worked closely with many of the African Bishop, have

Speaker:

such a strong love for the flame and the for crossing the flame,

Speaker:

the United Methodist as a as a body, as an

Speaker:

entity, as an identity that that

Speaker:

for them, regionalization made sense and and would

Speaker:

not compromise their ability to hold together

Speaker:

United Methodist in their their particular regions while there may be

Speaker:

some who who simply couldn't stay. But

Speaker:

I was not surprised that there was support,

Speaker:

and and and and I think it I think it behooves us not to

Speaker:

for anyone to take too much credit and just say as we said in the

Speaker:

beginning, it was general consensus and it was the work of the Holy Spirit.

Speaker:

Amen. But that's what the preachers were saying anyway that Right. You were preaching. It

Speaker:

was the work of the Holy Spirit. And so maybe God wanted to show

Speaker:

us that not only are you organizing, but but

Speaker:

but my will is that the church church be 1 going forward.

Speaker:

So I I concur with what what what Mark

Speaker:

said, and and I would have not predicted the numbers that the

Speaker:

that this past that the numbers that Give us a little give me a little

Speaker:

idea. I know it's around 500 delegates, and, you know, it was 2 thirds. Were

Speaker:

we well over the 2 thirds, or was it a close was it close to

Speaker:

There's supposed to be 862 delegates. I think there were only 750

Speaker:

C. And so we needed 2 thirds vote, but we got

Speaker:

78% Okay. Good. In the regionalization. 78%.

Speaker:

Wow. How about that? Overwhelming. And as Bishop said, you

Speaker:

know, there are a 100 plus delegates that weren't there. Maybe a 110

Speaker:

delegates who weren't there. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. If all of them had voted

Speaker:

no, it still would have been 2 thirds if all of them had voted no.

Speaker:

And we know we lost a ton of pro regionalization votes of people who couldn't

Speaker:

get there. Sure. That's very good. I think that consensus was So

Speaker:

the con the consensus was clear is all I really wanna get with that point.

Speaker:

The consensus was clear with the body. Let's move on then to to

Speaker:

the removal of harmful language. So, Mark, give us your take on how

Speaker:

that played out entering to general conference, how it played

Speaker:

out during the conference, and maybe some implications moving forward.

Speaker:

Well, we were again, we're pretty confident we had the votes. You know,

Speaker:

2019, the 1 church plan failed by

Speaker:

50 votes, and the traditional plan failed by or passed by 50

Speaker:

votes. And that was not a consensus. And we

Speaker:

needed 26 people to change their mind. Well, following that

Speaker:

2019 vote in February, in the spring, May

Speaker:

June in the US, annual conferences elected new delegations

Speaker:

and overwhelmingly voted out a number of the

Speaker:

traditional delegates and put in centrist and progressives.

Speaker:

Indiana saw this. Great Plains saw this. I mean, a lot of conferences

Speaker:

across the country. We knew we picked up the 26 votes we

Speaker:

needed to reverse that decision as early as 2019.

Speaker:

Then which is why they came out and asked for the protocol

Speaker:

because they knew the the conservative organizations

Speaker:

knew that they were not gonna be able to hold the line because we had

Speaker:

picked up the votes. Then with disaffiliations, the US lost 25%

Speaker:

of our of our votes or our members. But the general

Speaker:

conference did not recount votes, so we backfilled people

Speaker:

who had left with centrist and progressives. So we knew we had

Speaker:

even more votes than we had before. And then we were picking up

Speaker:

support around the world. So going in, we were very confident we had

Speaker:

the votes to remove the harmful language, and we were pretty specific in our coalition

Speaker:

that we didn't wanna add language. And this was controversial

Speaker:

because many, on the left wanna add affirmative language

Speaker:

of nondiscrimination language against gay and lesbian people, which we've done in the

Speaker:

secular communities, particularly in the United States. And there

Speaker:

was a real holding of our coalition to say, you know, we

Speaker:

wanna be clear. There's room for everyone. We want traditionalists in our church. We want

Speaker:

conservatives in our church, and we're going to hold the line on just removing

Speaker:

the language and reverting it back to neutral. And letting the annual conferences

Speaker:

decide who's eligible for ordination. Let churches

Speaker:

and pastors decide who who does weddings and not

Speaker:

not move further forward. That was very controversial on our coalition, but

Speaker:

we were we didn't wanna do that with a 51% majority. That

Speaker:

just feels harmful. Right? It just feels harmful to

Speaker:

to forward in. We need to find consensus yet on where we're headed. We

Speaker:

found consensus on removing the language. I think we need to hold that. So we

Speaker:

got huge numbers. I mean, it was passing in the consent calendar by 90%. Now

Speaker:

the consent calendar skewed because I would predict the

Speaker:

majority of delegates do not read what's on the consent calendar. But

Speaker:

we were even getting things that came up for a vote. We're getting 65

Speaker:

70%, which means people recognize it's time to move forward.

Speaker:

Sure. And it sounds like in effect, the effect,

Speaker:

we just moved as as far as the book of discipline goes, we just

Speaker:

went back to, what, 1972 discipline or something like that. Right? Is it

Speaker:

kind of what, in effect, what what we did? So well,

Speaker:

Bishop, react to what, Mark has, shared here and

Speaker:

particularly how you think the vibe in the room was or

Speaker:

how people reacted to this. I know this has been the

Speaker:

contentious point in the church for decades,

Speaker:

but now we have this moment of some resolution. Well, I'd I like the

Speaker:

quote from, doctor Ashley Bogan, the,

Speaker:

general secretary of United Methodist Archives in

Speaker:

History. This is the first time in 240 years

Speaker:

that the Methodist Church has not had discriminatory language in

Speaker:

its book of discipline. So if we go back to slavery and we

Speaker:

go back you know, whether slaveholders, we go back to segregation,

Speaker:

essential jurisdiction, the the the

Speaker:

the right for women to become ordained preachers of so forth and

Speaker:

so on and so that this is the first time we've not had discriminatory

Speaker:

language in our book of discipline. So this is a watershed

Speaker:

moment. And Bishop Tracy Smith, along the new

Speaker:

president of the council, the bishop said that we don't this is not a time

Speaker:

for us to show up stingy with grace. I really like that quote.

Speaker:

So I think that the onus is on the United Methodist

Speaker:

Church now really to impact our communities

Speaker:

because now our ecumenical partners and interfaith partners said, okay. You

Speaker:

no longer have an infighting. Let's get on with the business of transforming

Speaker:

the world. Making disciples but also transforming the world.

Speaker:

So I I think this I used to people used to

Speaker:

ask me, you know, they try to get bishops in in a trick bag and

Speaker:

say, well, do you do you adhere to the book of discipline? I said,

Speaker:

yes. They said, what about every single word in John? I said, well, I think

Speaker:

we have contradictions in our book of discipline. We say we welcome all people,

Speaker:

and we are we are commended to and mandated to be in ministry with and

Speaker:

for all people. Then we had contradictory language

Speaker:

except for if, you know, you're practicing homosexual, you

Speaker:

know, that's incompatible with Christian teaching, and you can't be ordained.

Speaker:

So I think now we no longer have those contradictory

Speaker:

sentences in the same paragraphs, if you will. It was significant. It'd

Speaker:

be interesting to hear Mark's take on this. When, someone came to the

Speaker:

floor and it it it was briefly discussed or

Speaker:

debated, there was a need to add marriages between a

Speaker:

man and a woman. I know for I know for traditionists here in Indiana

Speaker:

and other places, by just affirming that marriage is between a

Speaker:

man and a woman and adults of legal

Speaker:

age, then then there wasn't there wasn't a dismissal. Now some

Speaker:

would have preferred there would be no reference to that, but I think that would

Speaker:

goes back to what Mark said about some consensus. How do you how do you

Speaker:

bring about consensus? I don't wanna speak for you. Mark, how do you reflect?

Speaker:

Bishop, I thought that was an amazing moment on the floor of general conference

Speaker:

because we knew the definition of marriage was gonna be an issue in the revised

Speaker:

social principles. Now the coalition had the 3 r's, you know,

Speaker:

revised social principles, removing the language, and and

Speaker:

regionalization. Mainstream clumped removing the harmful

Speaker:

language and revised social principles together as a single goal because they both

Speaker:

accomplished that. And then we added stopping disaffiliations. But

Speaker:

that I think that moment when a a woman from Africa who had

Speaker:

just been elected to our to

Speaker:

our judicial council. This is a woman who's just elected.

Speaker:

So she's the one you know, she's was lifted up by Africa as

Speaker:

as a leader and came to the microphone and

Speaker:

offered this amendment that obviously got bogged down in parliamentary

Speaker:

procedure the

Speaker:

course

Speaker:

state the course and ultimately what she presented from Zimbabwe

Speaker:

was it's she recognized we agreed to

Speaker:

disagree. That we recognize in Africa is between a

Speaker:

man and a woman, and in the United States, it's between and for some people

Speaker:

in the United States, it's between a man and a woman. For some people in

Speaker:

the United States, it's 2 consenting adults. So if I

Speaker:

remember putting both of those in there in kind of an awkward parenthetical

Speaker:

statement, it works. And it passed

Speaker:

by, like, 80%. I mean, it was a it was an overwhelming

Speaker:

consensus moment to say something that we failed to pass in, Bishop.

Speaker:

I don't know if you remember this at general conference. I think it was at

Speaker:

2012 in Tampa. There was a resolution said, we

Speaker:

agree to disagree, and it failed,

Speaker:

like, 5149. Which proved the point.

Speaker:

It proved the point. It proved the point. So I was

Speaker:

really surprised. There was no one who had

Speaker:

who was contemplating that. What we were prepared to

Speaker:

do in the coalition was just to vote it through as as it stood. But

Speaker:

that compromise really caught people un

Speaker:

unaware, and it was the right thing at the right moment. It

Speaker:

was a holy spirit moment to agree to disagree, and it was powerful.

Speaker:

I think it also strengthens the case for regionalization

Speaker:

as well. Sure. That's exactly right, Bishop. I think it's it's interesting how

Speaker:

all these issues seem to come together, and they're I wasn't at general

Speaker:

conference, but it's both of you, I'm hearing you say there was just some kinda

Speaker:

god moments here. So things where things came together that just C to be of

Speaker:

the holy spirit, and that's a a cool thing. But I do want us to

Speaker:

touch on the other kinda hot button issue because it's interrelated to these other 2.

Speaker:

Of course, when we talk about harmful language, that led

Speaker:

to a process of disaffiliation over the

Speaker:

last several years. And one of the other

Speaker:

matters that was taken up that, majorly, UMC

Speaker:

particularly was pointing to was to stopping, you

Speaker:

know, stopping the disaffiliation process. So can you speak to that and how

Speaker:

that came up at general conference and how it was addressed? Well, there were

Speaker:

several petitions to extend paragraph 2553. Paragraph

Speaker:

2553, you might remember, was written by traditionalists. It was amended

Speaker:

on the floor in 2019 where everyone kinda chipped in

Speaker:

to make it better because it was terrible. It was worse than it is.

Speaker:

And 2553 is part of the traditional plan that was forced on the

Speaker:

church, and it was designed to get the quote, unquote liberals

Speaker:

to leave. And what in fact happened was when

Speaker:

they realized they won the vote but lost the church,

Speaker:

the conservatives decided to take their own gracious exit,

Speaker:

which is what they call it. They call it the gracious exit, and then did

Speaker:

nothing but complain about the terms of it. Let me just remind you, you

Speaker:

wrote it. If it's good enough for the, quote, unquote, liberals, it's good

Speaker:

enough for you. So they and of course, centrists are the ones who

Speaker:

just get caught in the middle thinking why is everybody fighting. So this this piece

Speaker:

on the disaffiliations went through

Speaker:

25% of churches left. In Great Plains, we had about 25% leave.

Speaker:

We kinda match the national average. And That's

Speaker:

about what we had in Indiana too. Right, Bishop? In that neighborhood? I forget. A

Speaker:

little more than that. We had a little more than 25%. Okay. And we but

Speaker:

we had 4 year as I said last and the conference,

Speaker:

I said people have had 4 years to disaffiliate. If they couldn't

Speaker:

disaffiliate, and then they did did need an extension. So

Speaker:

but I think some people came to this recent general conference

Speaker:

anticipating, not that promises were made, but

Speaker:

there were Bishop, and I know there were others who were saying, you know, let's

Speaker:

see what general conference does. And no one said that there was

Speaker:

gonna be an extension, but I think some people some

Speaker:

people who were not prepared fiscally or

Speaker:

otherwise to disaffiliate were anticipating or hoping that

Speaker:

there would be some extension or some new revised

Speaker:

2553. And I think the general conference said, this is

Speaker:

not helpful to advance the cause of the mission of the church,

Speaker:

and it's it's it has expired sunset,

Speaker:

and let it be gone. And, Mark, that was an over that was an overwhelming

Speaker:

vote too, I believe. Overwhelming. In fact, it never made it out committee. It never

Speaker:

came to the floor. It went straight through consent calendar. I mean, nobody even

Speaker:

it was dead on arrival. Yeah. And just to be clear, Mark, what it it

Speaker:

affect means is that the window opportunity, as it were,

Speaker:

closed December 31, 2023 for churches to

Speaker:

disaffiliate, and the effort to extend that window

Speaker:

was denied by the voted general conference. That's what we did. Right? That's

Speaker:

what we did. And I will re I'll reiterate, churches

Speaker:

have always come and gone from the United Methodist Church. And so there have always

Speaker:

been provisions for churches to leave. Those still remain in the book of discipline.

Speaker:

What it means though is this was kind of a sweetheart deal

Speaker:

where, you know, you had new church starts

Speaker:

where annual conferences had invested literally 1,000,000 of dollars

Speaker:

into properties and churches. Watch that

Speaker:

investment walk out the door. Yep. Right? And and

Speaker:

United Methodist Faithfully United Methodist funded these churches, and they

Speaker:

walked out the door with with all of them. Yeah. Yeah. So that that

Speaker:

was a big piece of 2553 is, obviously, there are

Speaker:

legal implications, federal law. You've gotta pay your part of

Speaker:

a pension. You can't walk out of a pension plan. You can't walk away from

Speaker:

a pension plan legally. So they had to pay their portion of the pension,

Speaker:

which is required. Now the conference can negotiate.

Speaker:

Cabinet trustees can negotiate with any church that doesn't want that doesn't wanna

Speaker:

stay at the terms of departure. What I didn't wanna see was

Speaker:

another top down because there were a lot of conferences that did this

Speaker:

well. I mean, we had churches you know, the Texas conference

Speaker:

lost half its churches. The idea of reopening it.

Speaker:

So every church because here's the harm. It's when

Speaker:

there there were churches that got divided just over whether or not to

Speaker:

vote, by putting by taking off the table the opportunity to

Speaker:

vote, then the churches can just say, hey, we're done. And

Speaker:

people need to make a decision of where they wanna go to church. And, you

Speaker:

know, I think the dividing of congregations could

Speaker:

not continue. And opening another window for 2

Speaker:

more years, 3 more years well, what good news wanted was 2029.

Speaker:

Right? They wanted just this fight to go on forever. We're done

Speaker:

fighting. It's back to what the Bishop said. We're in a post conflict

Speaker:

denomination. Sir, and this pro mission. And this is just

Speaker:

an area to kinda stop the bleeding. You know, there's still a process here, and

Speaker:

let's get on with, ministry. So, well, Mark, the

Speaker:

the vision and mission of this particular Bishop, Trimble's podcast is to

Speaker:

it's called the to be encouraged. And I like I always like to

Speaker:

give the bishop the last word, but I'd like to have you to kinda give

Speaker:

your take on kind of these the story, the

Speaker:

narrative of of general conference in

Speaker:

terms you know, kind of incorporating some of the the cuss discussion we have

Speaker:

today. But what out of that leaves you encouraged for the

Speaker:

church moving forward? Because now we gotta take every local church and

Speaker:

every local church pastor now has to take what general conference has done and

Speaker:

apply it to their situations. What encourages you?

Speaker:

Well, Brad, I wanna thank you for the opportunity to be on your podcast. Again,

Speaker:

Bishop, thank you for the invitation. It's an honor to share the time

Speaker:

with you. My encouragement is that we are in

Speaker:

a in a post conflict church. My encouragement is we're

Speaker:

we have a great mission to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the

Speaker:

transformation of the world. And that's what we're called to do. That's who we are.

Speaker:

I'm a 3rd generation Methodist pastor. And

Speaker:

my great grandma, our jurisdictional conference

Speaker:

in South Central will be at Rogers, Arkansas,

Speaker:

and that's Central United Methodist Church. That's where my great grandfather that's the church in

Speaker:

which my great grandfather was ordained in 1920. Wow. And so,

Speaker:

actually, my dad's coming with me. I'm bringing him to jurisdictional conference so we can

Speaker:

be there together. But this is my dad's a retired clergy

Speaker:

in in Great Plains. I'm encouraged by saying my

Speaker:

dad is fond of saying that history of the church is written in centuries, not

Speaker:

in decades. Mhmm. And we've had some tough

Speaker:

decades in the United Methodist Church, but God is not done

Speaker:

with us, and God is not done with the church. The church has survived 2000

Speaker:

years of human occupation, and the church is gonna continue to

Speaker:

march forward for to spread god's will in this in this world. So I'm

Speaker:

encouraged by that. I'm encouraged by the by the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Speaker:

I'm encouraged by the leadership we have in our bishops. I'm encouraged by

Speaker:

the direction we're moving as a denomination. I think it's a new

Speaker:

day, and I think we need to celebrate that and live into it.

Speaker:

Awesome. The, I love what you said. You know, this whole thing about, you

Speaker:

know, the post conflict church, we'll see how that plays out. So,

Speaker:

Bishop, how about a a last word, an encouraging word from you about what our

Speaker:

conversation here was entailing, and maybe you could close us with a prayer,

Speaker:

please. Well, I I I'm encouraged by just the

Speaker:

the the vast number of people who still hear the call of

Speaker:

God. You know, we celebrated a number of deaconesses

Speaker:

that are sent forth from general conference to do ministry in their local

Speaker:

communities here in the US and across the globe.

Speaker:

And we are looking forward to now to annual conferences taking

Speaker:

place in the US and across the globe where the United

Speaker:

Methodist Church will be able to respond to children who are

Speaker:

in poverty, or they'll be respond to the needs of our particular

Speaker:

community to be able to speak clearly. And I'm excited

Speaker:

about the fact we have after 12 years of of

Speaker:

revised social principles. You know? That was 2,012 when this

Speaker:

that work began. And so they have revised social principles

Speaker:

that are more user friendly across the globe, not just

Speaker:

US totally US centric. There's a lot to be excited

Speaker:

about particularly for those who have years

Speaker:

yet to go. You and I, Brad, we're we're in a

Speaker:

different chapter of our ministry, but there are others who are following us.

Speaker:

And I'm excited about the folks I just met at our at

Speaker:

our Rem retreat, the pastors who have a lot of years

Speaker:

ahead of them that are going to be doing United Methodist ministry. So

Speaker:

I think we're I've said this time and time, Brett, we've had

Speaker:

podcasts about this. I said if the pandemic couldn't kill the church,

Speaker:

nothing could kill the church. So I don't I don't think that our

Speaker:

our our our long standing debate about human sexuality

Speaker:

was nearly as challenging as a 2 slash 3

Speaker:

year pandemic. And we we find ourselves now

Speaker:

we've we shifted and moved. We now you know, we're slowly

Speaker:

we're dragged into the 21st century with social media

Speaker:

platforms. But I think if the pandemic and and my

Speaker:

theology is such that the church is of god. And so

Speaker:

Jesus said the gates of hell will not prevail against my church. So I think

Speaker:

it's a great time to be a Christian and follow-up Jesus and a

Speaker:

great time for people to to know that they are loved and

Speaker:

for us to take the responsibility to share that that

Speaker:

share that message widely and broadly. Did you wanna close us with prayer, Bishop?

Speaker:

Absolutely. Lord god, we give you thanks and praise for the gift of

Speaker:

life and for the gift of love.

Speaker:

And because you've given us life, we have the opportunity to

Speaker:

spread your grace, your love, your mercy in all

Speaker:

communities, all places with all people. Bless us to be a blessing,

Speaker:

Lord, and we will continue to give you all praise. In Jesus'

Speaker:

name, be encouraged. Amen. And we do thank you for

Speaker:

listening to the 2 Be Encourage podcast with

Speaker:

Bishop Julia c Tribble. Our special guest today, reverend

Speaker:

doctor Mark Holland, executive director of mainstreamumc

Speaker:

dotcom. You can find the links at to be encouraged.com.

Speaker:

Speaking for reverend doctor Mark Holland and, Bishop

Speaker:

Trimble, I'm reverend doctor Brad Miller reminding you to always

Speaker:

do all the good that you can.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube