Remembering Volkmar Pipek - on being curious, being you

Geri: 00:00:05

Welcome to Changing Academic Life.

2

: 00:00:08

I'm Geraldine Fitzpatrick and this is

a podcast series where academics and

3

: 00:00:12

others share their stories, provide

ideas and provoke discussions about what

4

: 00:00:17

we can do individually and collectively

to change academic life for the better.

5

: 00:00:30

Sometimes in the midst of all our

busy-ness and deadlines our pressures

6

: 00:00:34

to perform and advance our careers.

7

: 00:00:37

We can forget that life

is actually really short.

8

: 00:00:40

And really precious.

9

: 00:00:42

And we can lose perspective about

our work and what's really important.

10

: 00:00:48

The passing of a very dear colleague

th of January,: 2024

11

: 00:00:55

Was a stark reminder of this for me.

12

: 00:00:59

Volkmar died after a long

illness at the age of 56.

13

: 00:01:06

Before he died.

14

: 00:01:07

He was asked for advice to younger

colleagues and to researchers in general.

15

: 00:01:12

And he summed these up as be curious.

16

: 00:01:17

Be who you are.

17

: 00:01:19

And be curious who you are.

18

: 00:01:23

Wise advice from Volkmar that he

offered as part of an interview that

19

: 00:01:29

was conducted on the occasion of his

being awarded the EUSSET and ISSI

20

: 00:01:34

lifetime achievement award in 2023.

21

: 00:01:39

EUSSET is the European society for

socially embedded technologies and ISSI

22

: 00:01:45

is the Institute for socio informatics.

23

: 00:01:50

To mark this award Mateusz Dolata

from the university of Zurich

24

: 00:01:56

and with his hat as website and

social media person for EUSSET.

25

: 00:02:00

Conducted an interview with On

his perspectives of CSCW, which is

26

: 00:02:05

computer supported cooperative work

and research in general, including

27

: 00:02:10

his advice for younger researchers.

28

: 00:02:14

To quote from the EUSSET web page.

29

: 00:02:17

Posted by Mateusz.

30

: 00:02:19

The interview was published post hum.

31

: 00:02:22

Following the sad passing

of Volkmar in January,: 2024

32

: 00:02:27

Before that he'd provided us with

the initial draft of the interview.

33

: 00:02:31

After much deliberation, we decided to

share Volkmar's, insightful thoughts

34

: 00:02:36

with the broader community in this form.

35

: 00:02:38

End of quote.

36

: 00:02:42

In this short episode, I'd like to share

an extract from Volkmar's interview.

37

: 00:02:47

That specifically focuses on his advice.

38

: 00:02:53

I share this with the permission

of Mateusz and of the head

39

: 00:02:56

of the awards committee.

40

: 00:02:58

As full disclosure.

41

: 00:02:59

I was also a member of

this awards committee.

42

: 00:03:04

First a little background on Volkmar.

43

: 00:03:06

He was a faculty member in

computer supported cooperative

44

: 00:03:09

work and social media, at the

university of Siegen in Germany.

45

: 00:03:15

And his award was for his pioneering

work in the field of socio informatics.

46

: 00:03:20

This work was uniquely driven and shaped

by his strongly held values around

47

: 00:03:24

societal emancipation and democratization.

48

: 00:03:28

And you can read more about this and his

many specific intellectual and empirical

49

: 00:03:33

contributions in the statement about

his award and in the full interview.

50

: 00:03:38

And I'll put links to both of

these on the episode, webpage.

51

: 00:03:43

I've also known Volkmar for some

decades as a fellow colleague and

52

: 00:03:47

researcher in the CSCW community.

53

: 00:03:50

And always loved meeting up and chatting

with him, not just about his research.

54

: 00:03:57

But just about the many ways that

his values played out in his life

55

: 00:04:00

and the choices that he made.

56

: 00:04:02

For example, in the interview,

you'll be able to read about his

57

: 00:04:05

experience in starting a commune

58

: 00:04:08

now to the extract from

the full interview.

59

: 00:04:12

And it starts with the question posed

by Mateusz on behalf of EUSSET and

60

: 00:04:17

then follows with Volkmar's answers.

61

: 00:04:22

Begin quote.

62

: 00:04:24

EUSSET remains a very young organization.

63

: 00:04:27

One-third of active use set

members of PhD students.

64

: 00:04:31

And there are equally many young

members working as postdocs

65

: 00:04:34

or assistant professors.

66

: 00:04:36

Many of the members are looking up to

you as an eminent authority, seeking an

67

: 00:04:40

advice concerning research, focus, career

paths, or simply becoming a researcher.

68

: 00:04:47

What would be your message to them?

69

: 00:04:51

And Volkmar's response.

70

: 00:04:53

Be curious.

71

: 00:04:55

Be who you are.

72

: 00:04:57

Be curious who you are.

73

: 00:05:03

First be curious.

74

: 00:05:07

For being a good researcher,

you need to take a deep interest

75

: 00:05:11

into the world as it is.

76

: 00:05:14

How it became like that.

77

: 00:05:16

And where it's heading.

78

: 00:05:19

With deep.

79

: 00:05:20

I mean, that, it's important to

also acknowledge those aspects

80

: 00:05:23

that are not in line with your

own convictions and experiences.

81

: 00:05:28

As a young PhD researcher who took pride

in his participatory design attitude.

82

: 00:05:34

I had to present the project.

83

: 00:05:36

I was working into the worker

representative counsel of one of the

84

: 00:05:39

largest German, private health insurance

companies in order to get their

85

: 00:05:44

approval and ideally their support.

86

: 00:05:48

I rarely spoke to a less interested crowd

in my life and got a very board approval.

87

: 00:05:55

I left the meeting with the impression

those worker representatives

88

: 00:05:58

were just not doing their job.

89

: 00:06:02

But I picked that experience up and

tried to find out how that could

90

: 00:06:06

be given that they volunteered

for the job and had been elected.

91

: 00:06:12

That spark of interest helped

me finding out how difficult it

92

: 00:06:17

actually is for practitioners.

93

: 00:06:20

To imagine how their work would change.

94

: 00:06:22

Given there are new software tools or

information infrastructures available.

95

: 00:06:27

And given that impact

is so hard to imagine.

96

: 00:06:32

Why should they not instead turn their

attention to much more obvious topics.

97

: 00:06:40

Second.

98

: 00:06:41

Be who you are.

99

: 00:06:46

With a bachelor's thesis and

maybe also with a master's thesis.

100

: 00:06:51

You may be able to regard those

as tasks that have to get executed

101

: 00:06:55

in order to earn your certificate.

102

: 00:06:58

And their exact topics and results

may never matter to you or to

103

: 00:07:01

anybody in your future career.

104

: 00:07:05

If you pursue a PhD with that attitude.

105

: 00:07:08

It will be even more painful

and exhausting as it is anyway.

106

: 00:07:14

If you stick with the topic for

three to five years, it will

107

: 00:07:18

become a huge part of your life.

108

: 00:07:20

And research suddenly becomes a very

personal, even intimate endeavor.

109

: 00:07:26

It does not make sense to

undertake this endeavor.

110

: 00:07:30

Just because there is funding

and a supervisor who finds

111

: 00:07:34

you somewhat interesting.

112

: 00:07:37

The topic, the methodology, the

scientific community report to.

113

: 00:07:42

They all should fit your interests,

beliefs, experiences, and personality.

114

: 00:07:49

In the final years of my master's

studies, I developed the idea that I

115

: 00:07:54

could be a researcher in computer science.

116

: 00:07:57

I had specialized on artificial

intelligence and even visited

117

: 00:08:01

some national conferences.

118

: 00:08:05

Due to a private contact.

119

: 00:08:07

I stumbled across the book,

informatic and Gesellschaft, which

120

: 00:08:12

is computer science and society.

121

: 00:08:14

Co-authored by Thomas Herman, also

a member of the CSCW community.

122

: 00:08:20

Which gave me for the first time,

the impression that there could

123

: 00:08:23

be the option to pursue my general

interest into improving society.

124

: 00:08:28

Also as a researcher in CS.

125

: 00:08:33

I started out working for the DFK

I that German national research

126

: 00:08:37

center for artificial intelligence.

127

: 00:08:40

But then decided to change

to the university of Bonn.

128

: 00:08:44

Although I'd been offered a

contract for only 10 months there.

129

: 00:08:48

Although I had literally no clue

about the competences requested,

130

: 00:08:53

which was CSCW and usability and

showed that in my job interview.

131

: 00:08:58

Although all exclamation mark of

my future colleagues, therefore

132

: 00:09:02

voted for another candidate.

133

: 00:09:04

And although their boss

hired me, nevertheless, just

134

: 00:09:08

based on my knowledge in AI.

135

: 00:09:10

Not because I would particularly

fit the advertisement position.

136

: 00:09:16

I did so.

137

: 00:09:17

Just because former colleagues

of that group had shown an

138

: 00:09:20

interest in electronic democracy.

139

: 00:09:23

And I really wanted to learn to

work with users because that did

140

: 00:09:27

fit my interest profile better.

141

: 00:09:29

That was more who I was.

142

: 00:09:35

Third.

143

: 00:09:37

Be curious who you are.

144

: 00:09:42

A PhD is usually located at a time

in your life when you've placed the

145

: 00:09:46

first cornerstones of your life.

146

: 00:09:50

You decided to finish an education

that would hopefully feed you

147

: 00:09:53

for the rest of your life.

148

: 00:09:55

You may have, or have had a

first long-term relationship.

149

: 00:10:00

You may have moved and settled

in a new town for the first time.

150

: 00:10:06

But things are still in motion.

151

: 00:10:09

Life in general.

152

: 00:10:11

And a PhD process for sure

will provide you with many new

153

: 00:10:15

experiences and challenges that

have the potential to change you.

154

: 00:10:21

That's okay.

155

: 00:10:23

So don't stick too strongly

to your concerns and beliefs.

156

: 00:10:27

Go with the flow and trust,

rather your skills of improvisers

157

: 00:10:32

station, then your fear of change.

158

: 00:10:37

That particularly applies to

your research topics and career.

159

: 00:10:44

Before I submitted my PhD on

supporting appropriation work.

160

: 00:10:48

I've been offered, interested in

PhD topics, including privacy in

161

: 00:10:53

group work group, where there was

unpublished research available

162

: 00:10:57

that I could have built upon.

163

: 00:10:59

Also in metadata structures

for environmental informatics.

164

: 00:11:03

And project money available for that.

165

: 00:11:06

And inductive logic programming.

166

: 00:11:08

And approach that would have allowed me

to continue with AI, with applications

167

: 00:11:12

in CSCW my own idea, but really far out.

168

: 00:11:18

The final topic appropriation.

169

: 00:11:21

Only emerged in my third year as a PhD.

170

: 00:11:25

And it took me three more

years to complete it.

171

: 00:11:28

Not only to technically write it.

172

: 00:11:31

But also in terms of re-interpreting

my research experiences so that they

173

: 00:11:35

would form a whole in the dissertation.

174

: 00:11:39

Well, I did not expect to be able

to combine my social political

175

: 00:11:43

and technological interests.

176

: 00:11:44

When I started my research career.

177

: 00:11:46

I grew more and more confident

of myself to be able to do that.

178

: 00:11:53

End of quoted extract.

179

: 00:11:59

Thank you Volkmar there's so

much wisdom and insight here.

180

: 00:12:05

From the perspective of.

181

: 00:12:07

Distance.

182

: 00:12:10

Be curious.

183

: 00:12:12

Be who you are.

184

: 00:12:14

Be curious who you are.

185

: 00:12:20

And I, I loved that statement as part of

the third, be curious who you are about.

186

: 00:12:26

Go with the flow and trust, rather

your skills of improvisation

187

: 00:12:32

than your fear of change.

188

: 00:12:35

I encourage you to go and read the

whole interview that Volkmar shared.

189

: 00:12:40

I'm sure you'll love it.

190

: 00:12:43

And it just provides such great

food for thought about, again,

191

: 00:12:47

an example of a career path that

hasn't been straightforward and the

192

: 00:12:52

work that's involved and the reward

that's attached with shaping career

193

: 00:12:58

decisions, research decisions, life

decisions in line with what you really

194

: 00:13:02

care about and with your values.

195

: 00:13:05

And the difference we

can make in doing that.

196

: 00:13:09

So again, thank you.

197

: 00:13:10

Volkmar.

198

: 00:13:12

And thank you.

199

: 00:13:12

Mateusz for the interview and for

allowing us to share it here.

200

: 00:13:20

And we'll finish with Volkmar's

final thought, from the interview,

201

: 00:13:23

which locates our research endeavors

as part of a scholarly community.

202

: 00:13:27

That's caring and inclusive.

203

: 00:13:31

To start quoting from Volkmar

directly and I'll leave out some

204

: 00:13:35

of the specific names he mentioned

just to keep it more general.

205

: 00:13:39

But you can read this in

the interview itself.

206

: 00:13:43

So Volkmar says.

207

: 00:13:47

And as a final thought, I cannot

express enough gratitude for the

208

: 00:13:51

general kindness and the respect I

experienced in this scientific community.

209

: 00:13:57

As a young researcher, I

joined the community based on

210

: 00:13:59

a certain political enthusiasm.

211

: 00:14:02

Not based on a sound

education and much knowledge.

212

: 00:14:05

Yet my colleagues accepted their

bosses decision to hire me.

213

: 00:14:09

And took on the effort to

introduce me to the field.

214

: 00:14:14

In the first years of my career, I've

been introduced to important scholars.

215

: 00:14:19

Not based on my own scientific

merits, but based on a general

216

: 00:14:23

culture of inclusiveness and

respect of this community.

217

: 00:14:29

Aside from providing a nice feeling and

interesting discussion opportunities.

218

: 00:14:33

It also shows in the

formal scientific process.

219

: 00:14:36

The way, how respectfully reviews

are being written and how easy it

220

: 00:14:41

is to access, reviewing committees.

221

: 00:14:44

That's an asset.

222

: 00:14:44

We can be proud of.

223

: 00:14:46

And what we should cultivate.

224

: 00:14:51

End of quote.

225

: 00:14:55

And in honour of Volkmar.

226

: 00:14:57

May we all play our own part in showing

kindness and respect to one another.

227

: 00:15:03

And being part of creating that

inclusive scientific community . And

228

: 00:15:09

remembering that life is short.

229

: 00:15:12

And precious.

230

: 00:15:19

You can find the summary

notes, a transcript and related

231

: 00:15:22

links for this podcast on www.

232

: 00:15:25

changingacademiclife.

233

: 00:15:27

com.

234

: 00:15:28

You can also subscribe to

Changing Academic Life on iTunes,

235

: 00:15:33

Spotify and Google Podcasts.

236

: 00:15:34

And you can follow

ChangeAcadLife on Twitter.

237

: 00:15:39

And I'm really hoping that we can

widen the conversation about how

238

: 00:15:42

we can do academia differently.

239

: 00:15:44

And you can contribute to this by rating

the podcast and also giving feedback.

240

: 00:15:49

And if something connected with

you, please consider sharing this

241

: 00:15:52

podcast with your colleagues.

242

: 00:15:55

Together, we can make change happen.

Share Episode

Shownotes

Transcripts

Follow

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube