Help us become the #1 Data Podcast by leaving a rating & review! We are 67 reviews away!

Watched an ex-Google analyst break down why AI hasn’t replaced data analysts. I show you where I agree and where I don’t.

💌 Join 33k+ aspiring data analysts & get my tips in your inbox weekly 👉 https://datacareerjumpstart.com/newsletter

🆘 Feeling stuck in your data journey? Come to my next free "How to Land Your First Data Job" training 👉 https://datacareerjumpstart.com/training

👩‍💻 Want to land a data job in less than 90 days? 👉 https://datacareerjumpstart.com/daa

👔 Ace The Interview with Confidence 👉 https://datacareerjumpstart.com/interviewsimulator

⌚ TIMESTAMPS

00:00 – AI didn’t kill the job

02:45 – Big Tech isn’t the real market

09:15 – The hype doesn’t match the data

16:45 – Where AI guessed wrong

19:03 – The analysts at risk

20:27 – What makes you irreplaceable

📺 Watch Sundas’ original video 👉 https://youtu.be/r4lEzAM3VOY

🎙️ Listen to Out of the Office with Sundas 👉 https://open.spotify.com/show/5yBNLUp8oRPDXoLTkvaBku

🤝 Connect with Sundas on LinkedIn 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/in/sundaskhalid/

🔗 CONNECT WITH AVERY

🎥 YouTube Channel

🤝 LinkedIn

📸 Instagram

🎵 TikTok

💻 Website

Avery Smith's screen-4: Than about your business.

And the truth is that at any given company, the context is actually spread

across a dashboard, documentation, code, Slack, conversations, and the memories.

What is it called?

There is a term for it.

Tribal knowledge.

Yes, years of tribal knowledge that lives in people's head.

Buying an AI tool does not fix that foundation.

And if your company has recently adopted AI to do data analysis

work, let me know how that is going.

The second reason why AI has r- failed to replace data analyst is human judgment.

Yes, AI can produce an explanation that sounds reasonable.

You still need to know whether it makes sense.

Simple as that.

I once used AI to understand why clicks from Google search had dropped, right?

Simple question.

The AI actually suggested failing search demand, uh, because of a

ranking change, broken tracking and whatnot, and mix of queries.

Like, that was a mumbo jumbo thing, but that was actually

not the right explanation.

All of those theoretically made sense, but somebody like me who actually

had the business context, I actually knew the real cause why the traffic

went down was because Google ended something called continuous scroll.

So instead of, like, continuous scrolling through the search page,

you actually had now page numbers.

So a user had to specifically click on the next page to land on

basically the next search results.

And when you add more clicks, you actually, uh, increase user fatigue,

and people are less likely to do it, and that was the cause of the traffic

drop, which AI was not able to catch.

This is an exam-

Example of business context and human judgment.

In the real world, you actually needed to have the business context.

You needed to have the history, product history, and have to know

Interface itself to basically figure out why traffic was down.

So now you must be wondering which data analyst should

actually be worried about AI.

Let me just be very transparent.

If your value comes from pulling a number after someone else has defined the

question, you're just writing basic SQL, a refreshing dashboard, and summarizing

changes, that work is becoming easier with AI and more likely to get automated.

The more-

A durable analyst defines the metric, challenges the request, understands the

domain, validates the output, and connects the analy- analysis to a decision.

Remember decision?

We actually haven't talked about that.

Let me know if I should cover that in a different video.

This could be a product analyst who understands user behavior, a growth

analyst who understands acquisitions and retention, or an analytics

engineer who builds foundation AI needs

Or a data analyst who actually is focused on defining business

problem and decision-making.

The common thread in all of these role is ownership, context, and judgment

The role is

Ownership, context, and judgment.

So has AI replacing data analyst officially failed?

I'm happy to share that it has failed to eliminate the role.

It has succeeded at changing it, but it has not replaced it

And this is true for majority of the tech roles.

The pro-

Coding only version of the job is, yes, under pressure, but the analyst who

understands the business, use AI well, and knows when to answer is wrong, answer

is wrong, is becoming more important.

If you work in data analytics field, let me know what has been your experience.

Do you agree with this?

Do you think AI has failed to replace a data analyst, or we're not there yet?

Let me know in comments.

With that, I hope you're having a beautiful day.

I'll see you in the next video.

Have a good one.

Bye.

Than about your business.

And the truth is that at any given company, the context is actually spread

across a dashboard, documentation, code, Slack, conversations, and the memories.

What is it called?

There is a term for it.

Tribal knowledge.

Yes, years of tribal knowledge that lives in people's head.

Buying an AI tool does not fix that foundation.

And if your company has recently adopted AI to do data analysis

work, let me know how that is going.

The second reason why AI has r- failed to replace data analyst is human judgment.

Yes, AI can produce an explanation that sounds reasonable.

You still need to know whether it makes sense.

Simple as that.

I once used AI to understand why clicks from Google search had dropped, right?

Simple question.

The AI actually suggested failing search demand, uh, because of a

ranking change, broken tracking and whatnot, and mix of queries.

Like, that was a mumbo jumbo thing, but that was actually

not the right explanation.

All of those theoretically made sense, but somebody like me who actually

had the business context, I actually knew the real cause why the traffic

went down was because Google ended something called continuous scroll.

So instead of, like, continuous scrolling through the search page,

you actually had now page numbers.

So a user had to specifically click on the next page to land on

basically the next search results.

And when you add more clicks, you actually, uh, increase user fatigue,

and people are less likely to do it, and that was the cause of the traffic

drop, which AI was not able to catch.

This is an exam-

Example of business context and human judgment.

In the real world, you actually needed to have the business context.

You needed to have the history, product history, and have to know

Interface itself to basically figure out why traffic was down.

So now you must be wondering which data analyst should

actually be worried about AI.

Let me just be very transparent.

If your value comes from pulling a number after someone else has defined the

question, you're just writing basic SQL, a refreshing dashboard, and summarizing

changes, that work is becoming easier with AI and more likely to get automated.

The more-

A durable analyst defines the metric, challenges the request, understands the

domain, validates the output, and connects the analy- analysis to a decision.

Remember decision?

We actually haven't talked about that.

Let me know if I should cover that in a different video.

This could be a product analyst who understands user behavior, a growth

analyst who understands acquisitions and retention, or an analytics

engineer who builds foundation AI needs

Or a data analyst who actually is focused on defining business

problem and decision-making.

The common thread in all of these role is ownership, context, and judgment

The role is

Ownership, context, and judgment.

So has AI replacing data analyst officially failed?

I'm happy to share that it has failed to eliminate the role.

It has succeeded at changing it, but it has not replaced it

And this is true for majority of the tech roles.

The pro-

Coding only version of the job is, yes, under pressure, but the analyst who

understands the business, use AI well, and knows when to answer is wrong, answer

is wrong, is becoming more important.

If you work in data analytics field, let me know what has been your experience.

Do you agree with this?

Do you think AI has failed to replace a data analyst, or we're not there yet?

Let me know in comments.

With that, I hope you're having a beautiful day.

I'll see you in the next video.

Have a good one.

Bye.