After almost five weeks on the line, a 96% strike mandate and many concessions, Canadian Postal Workers weren't able to have a say in their contract, yet again.
What does it mean when one of the strongest unions in Canada hasn't been able to negotiate a fair deal in 12+ years? Find out from the rank and file what happened and where they can go from here.
Strike Captain, Stop Steward and Mail Carrier Sera sits down with Host Jessa McLean to talk about the dealings with Canada Post bosses, the attempts to build militancy inside the union and more...
All of our content is free - made possible by the generous sponsorships of our Patrons. If you would like to support us: Patreon
End Song Credit: "What Unions Did for You", Dave Pomeroy
Resources:
Happy New Year, everyone. Here's to another 365 days of disrupting the status quo and trying
Speaker:to bring down capitalism, one episode at a time. My name is Jessa and this is Blueprints of
Speaker:Disruption. It's been a few weeks now since 55,000 Canadian postal workers were ordered
Speaker:back to work by the Liberals and the Canadian Industrial Relations Board. Anytime we hear
Speaker:that the right to strike has been undermined, we understandably get upset. This is the tool
Speaker:of workers, right? Withholding or modifying our collective labor is one of the only real
Speaker:pieces of leverage we have over our bosses. I'm sure that's not even news to any of you,
Speaker:but this wasn't just any strike. This was Cup W and Canada Post did their workers dirty.
Speaker:They didn't even try to bargain in good faith because they knew the precedent had already
Speaker:been set. that the feds would undermine their constitutional rights and force yet another
Speaker:contract on them. One of the most historically successful unions in Canada has seemingly lost
Speaker:the ability to negotiate a deal with their bosses. Even with a 96% strike mandate, many concessions,
Speaker:and almost five weeks walking the line. On the day they were ordered back to work, A CupW
Speaker:Strike captain and shop steward sat down with me to talk about what the posties were demanding
Speaker:and just why this latest development was such a blow to them. You'll hear details on the
Speaker:back and forth with the greedy bosses at Canada Post. But come on, all of that was to be expected.
Speaker:Bosses will be bosses. What becomes hard to accept and to hear is the lack of courage coming
Speaker:from union leadership. They chose pragmatism again in their ever-weakening position. Because
Speaker:on December 17th, when there should have been a massive display of defiance by Canadian labor
Speaker:and allies, there wasn't even a handful of lines being held. No other labor union or coalition
Speaker:officially walked with them. The odd flag showed up, but these numbers were in the dozens, not
Speaker:the hundreds or thousands that it should have been. It was also crickets from the leader
Speaker:of the federal NDP, the so-called Workers' Party. They spent none of their resources trying to
Speaker:protect the right to strike in Canada in that moment. CUPW, whose strikes have helped set
Speaker:employment standards we all benefit from, was out on their own. All our social media posts
Speaker:and statements of solidarity translated into nothing meaningful when it was needed. We taught
Speaker:the bosses a lesson that day, but it wasn't the one they should have been learning. They
Speaker:should have witnessed the power of Canadian labor and the willingness of elected union
Speaker:leaders to take risks in key moments, because this was a key moment. So, as it usually is,
Speaker:the work is left to the rank and file. So let's hear from them. Welcome to Blueprint Sarah.
Speaker:Can you introduce yourself to the audience, please? Hi, my name's Sarah. I'm a shop steward
Speaker:with CPW Local 626 and a letter carrier. I also served as a picket captain for the last five
Speaker:weeks that we've been on strike. You said it this time, right? Five weeks is a long time
Speaker:to be a picket captain. So I can imagine today, emotions are very raw. For the audience, we're
Speaker:on Tuesday, December 17th, talking to Sarah and- This is the day that Cup W workers have
Speaker:been ordered back to work. Before we get into what that five weeks was like, let's help our
Speaker:audience better understand the strike, you know, the meat and potatoes of why you folks were
Speaker:on strike in the first place. Yeah, absolutely. The union was really left with no other choice
Speaker:but to initiate strike action by Canada Post, who has fundamentally disrespected us. for
Speaker:the last several years, six years that I've worked for this corporation. What they've tried
Speaker:to do to us is they've tried to fundamentally restructure the way all of the work is done
Speaker:at the post office. That restructuring affects everybody. It includes letter carriers like
Speaker:myself, as well as people who work indoors. And the broad strokes of what they're trying
Speaker:to do to us is to reduce our job security, reduce our benefits. reduce our pensions. And they're
Speaker:trying to segregate the workforce yet more between casual flex employees and full-time employees.
Speaker:This isn't just going to be, this isn't just going to hurt new employees who are hired under
Speaker:the casual flex model, which is really gigification of our job, but it will affect everyone. For
Speaker:example, the corporation has tried to implement something. two letter carriers called separate
Speaker:sort and delivery. When I was hired with Canada post, what we would do is we would daily prepare
Speaker:our mail, um, which meant we would sort our own mail and then we would take it out for
Speaker:the day's delivery. This included mail, parcels and flyers. This gave them letter carriers
Speaker:control over how their route was delivered. It gave them knowledge of where hazards were
Speaker:on their route and were able to adjust their mail accordingly. And it was a fundamentally
Speaker:much more efficient system for delivery than what the corporation is trying to implement.
Speaker:The routes that letter carriers are being asked to do by the corporation have become fundamentally
Speaker:inhumane. There's no other way to word what is being done. Letter carriers are being asked
Speaker:to walk upwards of 30. 40 kilometers a day on routes which entail 9,000 stairs. They're being
Speaker:asked to drive through Toronto traffic to get to these locations and being asked to do this
Speaker:all in an eight-hour day. I'm not an Olympic athlete and asking me to do what is essentially
Speaker:a marathon every day
Speaker:is an absurd ask. On top of this, letter carriers are blamed. for their own health and safety
Speaker:issues. The corporation was recently found by the Supreme Court of Canada to not be responsible
Speaker:for health and safety issues that happen outside of the workplace, namely everywhere a letter
Speaker:carrier goes. So they don't investigate those hazards. Wait a minute, wait a minute, sorry.
Speaker:The places a letter carrier walks and delivers mail while being paid is not considered the
Speaker:workplace? You're talking about like a sorting facility or where they pick up the mail or
Speaker:park the vehicle and that's it. Yes. And that's all that the corporation is expected to have
Speaker:general control over. And therefore the only thing that the corporation is really concerned
Speaker:about when it comes to health and safety is the direct workplace where under SSD letter
Speaker:carriers spend less than 30 to 40 minutes a day. If we get injured. We're often blamed
Speaker:for our own injuries. We're often accused of rushing, which doesn't make any sense when
Speaker:you're putting expectations on us of going 30 to 40 kilometers on our feet in a day, while
Speaker:carrying increasingly heavy loads. The corporation has put an extreme focus, and I'm probably
Speaker:annoying a lot of your listeners, but it is the corporation's major focus is on delivery
Speaker:of ads in neighborhood mail. which we provide an essential service to Canadians, it's no
Speaker:doubt, but the corporation is far more interested in these ads. And those ads can constitute
Speaker:massive weights on the back of a letter carrier. We're talking for a loop that a letter carrier
Speaker:has to do. It could be 60, 80 pounds of ad mail alone before you factor in the parcels, packets,
Speaker:and like all the mail that the carrier has to deliver along that area. The major problem
Speaker:that has always been the issue for letter carriers is that there's no time value given to the
Speaker:carrier to deliver the flyers. The flyers are considered incentive piecemeal work, which
Speaker:means we're paid one penny per flyer we deliver, but we don't get any time in our day. This
Speaker:puts letter carriers into an untenable position, which essentially forces them into overtime
Speaker:almost every day. The corporation doesn't like that the carriers are doing this. But their
Speaker:solution is not to fix their measurement system. Their solution is to compact the amount of
Speaker:time that the carrier spends in the depot by removing their need to sort the mail. The issue
Speaker:is that previously, this was an unspoken truth, but it was a truth nonetheless, is that what
Speaker:letter carriers were doing to make this situation work is they would prioritize that section
Speaker:of delivery where they had the flyers for the day, and they would prioritize their parcels.
Speaker:Then they would reintegrate the mail that was not in the priority section into the next day
Speaker:delivery and just continue doing that. Which is not an ideal solution because it delays
Speaker:the delivery of people's mail, but it was a solution that the letter carriers were forced
Speaker:into. What the corporation has done by taking away our ability to sort and prepare our own
Speaker:mail is actually deprive us of the ability to even do that. So now the corporation is putting
Speaker:these expectations on us. that we will complete the entirety of a 30 kilometer route every
Speaker:day despite knowing full well that much of what we deliver and which takes a significant amount
Speaker:of time is not factored into route delivery. I mean and these are just your grievances,
Speaker:some of your grievances for this particular work stoppage but Canada Post has a history
Speaker:of being a shit employer. Right? Like this is upon layer upon layer of changes that have
Speaker:happened to carriers and other workers within Canada Post over the years, the removal of
Speaker:rural delivery. I know that was a liberal policy, but it's just, Cup W workers have not had it
Speaker:easy for many, many years facing up against this employer. The timing of the strike is
Speaker:likely what's on the lips of a lot of people talking to family members about the strike,
Speaker:right? Let's be honest, there's certain times of the year where folks wouldn't feel the pinch
Speaker:so bad and I kind of likened it to the teachers when they strike. It's really, really hard
Speaker:to get the public to fully understand it when they're inconvenienced. I mean, I know that
Speaker:is so lame to say, cause we can definitely unpack. why strikes are like the front line of the
Speaker:working class against capital or one of the front lines. Me and you understand that value,
Speaker:but you know, it's when it's like, oh, they're put out. It's, they find it harder to stand
Speaker:in solidarity, obviously. So why did this happen around Christmas time? Was that a strategic
Speaker:move by Cup W or was that initiated by the employer? more than patient with the employer. I mean,
Speaker:we've been bargaining with them for over a year. Our demands have been known by the corporation
Speaker:for over a year. We asked for raises in line with inflation to help us keep up with the
Speaker:growing cost of food, with the growing cost of rent. Many letter carriers are making about
Speaker:$35,000 a year because of the part-time casual work that exists in the post office. It's not
Speaker:enough money to live on. And we're just asking for our of what we do. And our demands were
Speaker:also related to the SSD model and the route structuring. Our demands were related to integrating
Speaker:our RSMC unit, which is not paid hourly, into our urban unit, which is paid hourly. Our demands
Speaker:were very, very basic. And we were not asking for much from this corporation. And we gave
Speaker:the corporation those demands in February. The corporation... for a year. Did nothing with
Speaker:those demands, didn't respond, didn't give us anything. That was until, I think it was roughly
Speaker:near the end of summer, when they gave us their first global offer. And their first global
Speaker:offer was like a quarter of our wage increase demand. We're currently, I think I've seen
Speaker:the numbers that are like 18%. behind inflation. So that means over the last 20 years, our wages
Speaker:are 18% below inflation. And we're asking for 19%, you know, we're asking for a little bit
Speaker:extra, but not too much. The corporation offered us, I think 5% was their first offer. They
Speaker:offered us 5% and they said, oh, by the way, we want to also get rid of all of your job
Speaker:positions, all of your routes, and we want you all to be casual flex employees. That's not
Speaker:a tenable solution. You knew about our demands. What a low ball. It was, we were all shocked
Speaker:to receive this. And not only that, they didn't just submit it to our union to review and present
Speaker:it to us. They mailed it out to every single of the 55,000 CPW members in a single page
Speaker:document that essentially said, we're gonna give you 5%. And in return, You give us your
Speaker:entire collective agreement. Obviously people are upset about this. The union came back and
Speaker:said, well, we obviously can't accept this. Um, can you give us something better? And I
Speaker:believe the corporation moved maybe 5.5%, but they also added that, Oh, you can keep your
Speaker:route. But basically what we're going to do is we're going to assess your route at a length
Speaker:that is way, way too long to complete. And then every day based off of AI. remove part of that
Speaker:and give it to somebody else, our casual flex force.
Speaker:There are like no bosses out there that aren't exploiting AI to fuck us even more. Gee Louise.
Speaker:That was obviously unacceptable. And it was at this time that the union took their strike
Speaker:vote and said, look, we can't work in these conditions. We can't work with what you're
Speaker:giving us. So we have to take a strike vote. Corporation didn't budge on their on their
Speaker:position after he came back with an resign resounding 96% strike vote When was that I think it was
Speaker:an October. It's been it's blur. It's been so long So the corporation didn't bid budge on
Speaker:their position at all We were essentially forced into the position because after you take a
Speaker:strike vote You have to enact that strike vote or it becomes mute. I think it was like There's
Speaker:like a legal limit somewhere between 30 and 60 days. And like everyone knows Cup W will
Speaker:strike, right? So these employers are just they know the fucking liberals will order y'all
Speaker:back to work eventually. There's so many industries that are just under the full understanding
Speaker:that the right to strike has been so depleted at this point that they're just not even trying
Speaker:at the bargaining table. I mean, it works for them once more. That sort of strategy of we
Speaker:don't have to negotiate with workers. We don't have to give a damn what workers think because
Speaker:they don't matter. They don't matter to us. They don't matter to this government. They
Speaker:have no power. And for now, it looks like Canada Post is getting away with that strategy of
Speaker:bargaining, which is essentially just to tell us to take what they're offering, the scraps
Speaker:we're offering, and to shut up. You know? Um, and, um, we've budged on our demands. We came
Speaker:down five, 6% on our wage demands. We offered them that thing they were saying they wanted
Speaker:to do. We said, fine, you can do it. You can have your, you can, you can take work away
Speaker:from letter carriers based off of your AI modeling by removing our, our right to 1508, which has
Speaker:always been the cap on the corporation making routes too long, which was essentially letter
Speaker:carriers are entitled to do overtime on their own routes. If the corporation is making routes
Speaker:too long, then it's going to incur them overtime because the letter carriers are going to incur
Speaker:overtime on a daily basis. But we said to them, look, we'll give up our right to overtime on
Speaker:our own routes, which is a huge concession. It's a massive concession and it allows the
Speaker:corporation to make routes really however long they want them to be. and then just piecemeal
Speaker:out that work. That's bad faith bargaining, right? Seeing you folks move so much on that
Speaker:and them just basically standing there smug as fuck, saying, yeah, okay, whatever. We just
Speaker:have to outweigh you. I mean, I don't know if you folks heard before we did, but hearing
Speaker:that the labor minister was going to refer it to the board and then you folks were ordered
Speaker:back to work. You must have expected this at some point, right? Five weeks is a long time
Speaker:to be on strike, and you are essential workers, and the Liberal government behaves like this.
Speaker:I mean, maybe you weren't expecting this. Am I being presumptuous? Did you think that Canada
Speaker:Post would make a deal? The corporation's modus operandi for, well, as long as I can remember,
Speaker:certainly 2012 or 2011 in the Harper government. forced a contract onto us. 2018, when the Liberal
Speaker:government forced an extension of the Harper government contract onto us, to say that we
Speaker:weren't expecting back to work legislation would be, it would be naive. Frankly, that's why
Speaker:I wanted to be a postal worker, since I was like a kid, because I saw how hard they fought
Speaker:for their rights. I was... Excited to be a part of that. Um, it's the only real union I ever
Speaker:saw strike to be honest Anyway, um, we were we were expecting back-to-work legislation
Speaker:But in the liberal government as they often do lied to us every step of the way In order
Speaker:to bleed us dry They kept us out on the line for almost five weeks and they told us the
Speaker:whole time We're not gonna order you back to work. We're not gonna order you back to work
Speaker:and we're not gonna order you back to work because you're obsolete. Nobody cares about the postal
Speaker:service anymore. So you guys can negotiate what you want and that's how we'll get established.
Speaker:What became increasingly clear as the postal service remained out on strike was that the
Speaker:postal service very much is an essential service to the Canadian economy. We keep the wheels
Speaker:of commerce moving, especially for small businesses, rural communities. in this country and as well
Speaker:we depress the cost to ship goods. Canada Post offers flat rate shipping across the entire
Speaker:country. Outside of urban centers to the most remote areas of this country, you pay the same
Speaker:rate. No other carrier can possibly compete with that. And what became increasingly clear
Speaker:is that the private companies were gouging. The private companies didn't have the capacity.
Speaker:Anybody who tried to send anything knows that is true. And we also know that the CEO of Canada
Speaker:Post is also the CEO of Pyrrolator. He's not the CEO. He is the audit committee chair or
Speaker:something. Of Pyrrolator. Of Pyrrolator, yeah. Okay, thank you. I've posted both of his email
Speaker:addresses on my Twitter account if anyone's interested. Yeah, he gets paid over $600,000
Speaker:to sit as the CEO of Canada Post or somewhere between $580,000 and $620,000. He gets paid
Speaker:somewhere plus 33% bonuses. Hold on, I got a fun fact because I sat with my family, we were
Speaker:talking about the strike and managers and supervisors and vice presidents and I don't know where
Speaker:I got the information, but I was able to find it, how many and what they were each paid.
Speaker:And wow. upper management is just bloated at Canada Post. I mean, the top dogs get paid
Speaker:a lot, but then there's a lot of like, a couple steps down getting paid a lot, a lot, a lot,
Speaker:a lot of money. And it that is incredible when you consider the arguments that they're making.
Speaker:What was it like for workers five weeks on? I mean, if they're all under the same knowledge
Speaker:or assumption that eventually they will be ordered back to work, regardless of what Canada Post
Speaker:is telling them to their face. Was that really hard to keep up people's spirits for five weeks
Speaker:or were folks still militant and ready to hold the line a little bit longer?
Speaker:some of the lines still being held. There's a large contingent of postal workers who understand
Speaker:that this strike is really live or die for our union. And we know that if we don't get a good
Speaker:contract now, we may never get a good contract. We may never have another negotiated contract.
Speaker:So there's a large contingent of workers who are militant and want to hold these lines as
Speaker:long as they can, but it's not because they're well equipped and not because they're not suffering,
Speaker:because they are. But it's because we've seen literally no other choice. But there is also
Speaker:a large contingent of people who are scared. They're scared because the charade that the
Speaker:Liberal government and Canada Post played was effective. And that charade was, we don't have
Speaker:to negotiate with you or offer you anything. And the whole belief that is now circulated
Speaker:is that the corporation does not want to, is not able to, and cannot offer us anything better.
Speaker:then gigification raises less than inflation, cuts to our pension, cuts to our benefits.
Speaker:That mentality has sunk in, but people don't seem to realize that the only reason the corporation
Speaker:refused to negotiate for so long was because they knew they didn't have to. They knew Big
Speaker:Brother was gonna step in and send the little peons back to work, and they would just play,
Speaker:you know, the good guy. and the whole thing. So yes, it's a mixed bag. It's a mixed bag.
Speaker:Everyone's furious, to be clear. People are furious. They're furious that we were standing
Speaker:on those picket lines in the snow, in the rain for five weeks, living off of, if you picketed
Speaker:it every day, $280 a week from the union. Most people couldn't pick it every day. And it's
Speaker:not sustainable. You can't live that way. You can't pay rent. You can't make your student
Speaker:loan payments. You can't make your debt payments you it's uh, it's backbreaking So yeah people
Speaker:are in both camps people are like we have to and other people less so not I imagine that's
Speaker:the case with almost any strike, right, but That is um, that was gut-wrenching to actually
Speaker:hear you say that You may not ever get another negotiated contract again. That hit hard. I
Speaker:don't think I viewed it that way, but you make the argument and it's kind of hard. I mean,
Speaker:it's not like it was even this detailed argument. I mean, if you just simply look at the behavior,
Speaker:even provincially, trying to use the notwithstanding clause to order. workers back. It's like they
Speaker:are doing everything possible to simply make unions obsolete. Like you can exist, but I
Speaker:won't allow you to be effective in any way. Now that it's Tuesday and some folks are back
Speaker:to work, some folks are holding the line. I think a lot of the lines that are being held
Speaker:are being called community lines, that they're not just Cup W workers. I mean, the whole time
Speaker:it shouldn't have been just Cup W workers. for the record, even I took my kids to the line
Speaker:for heaven's sake. But it's, you know, I saw footage coming from Richmond showing a processing
Speaker:plant there being held by the steelworkers. I saw BCGU and some other usual suspects out
Speaker:in BC. So it's a mixed bag today. How do you wish... Okay, let's say we had to go through
Speaker:this band-aid part of ordering y'all back to work because like it was expected. Right? Were
Speaker:we not preparing for this as... especially the militant members? Like stealing yourself is
Speaker:one thing, but then making a plan to hold the lines regardless. Yeah, for sure. Obviously,
Speaker:I would have preferred we'd have a different outcome than we got, which was to, on the face
Speaker:of it, capitulate to the... illegal back to work orders of the CIRB, the unelected CIRB.
Speaker:To speak to what some of the militants were doing up until this point, we had an excellent
Speaker:group of people called Posties Ready to Defy trying to circulate the message that defiance
Speaker:was going to be necessary at some point in our negotiations. I think that was kind of tried
Speaker:to be headed off by the liberals who said, no, that's not going to happen. that's not gonna
Speaker:happen, that's not gonna happen, it's gonna happen, you know? But so our members in Edmonton
Speaker:managed to get a motion passed through their local in order to hold votes on the picket
Speaker:line as to whether we would defy, from my understanding those votes passed at 70% that they would defy.
Speaker:However, their union leadership also refused to go against the NEB. So there was a large...
Speaker:movement towards defiance and I circulated the memorandums from that line across our own picket
Speaker:line, preparing people for defiance. But the overwhelming sentiment amongst a lot of people
Speaker:is that defiance means we get arrested, defiance means we get fines, and a lot of people are
Speaker:fearful of that. Obviously we saw QP go in 22. continue to hold their lines against the threat
Speaker:of fines. And I don't believe any fines were ever leveled in the end, but it's hard to convince
Speaker:people of this, that the workers really ultimately are the ones that have the power and not the
Speaker:courts. So we've tried to push through our own local and so forth motions to similar effects,
Speaker:but the engagement. that happens at locals. I don't wanna speak badly of locals in general,
Speaker:but it's a very bureaucratic procedure. And a lot of workers aren't knowledgeable or prepared
Speaker:to fight a bureaucratic battle in the way that some long time members of a local might be.
Speaker:So it's an uphill battle for rank and file workers, but it's not insurmountable. And it's not one
Speaker:that I'm prepared to say we've lost. We have now a little less than six months until we
Speaker:are negotiating again, whatever that means. And obviously, you know, we remain, from my
Speaker:point of view, in a legal strike position up until that point. So now I think the push is
Speaker:really on to get workers to see that, you know, this is our do or die moment. And the entire
Speaker:working... class in this country is looking to us for leadership because we saw the longshoremen,
Speaker:the rail workers, all face the same attacks and get forced into arbitration. But the Liberal
Speaker:government has left a door open here and hopefully not a door that, you know, is closed by a coming
Speaker:conservative government, which I don't want to be pessimistic, which is, I don't know,
Speaker:is that is a really different difference? But anyway, the Liberal government has left a door
Speaker:here. for postal workers to organize, to build momentum, and to change what has become a defeat
Speaker:and turn it into a victory. Because where we are at now is not a good position to be in.
Speaker:We have workers who are desperate. We have workers who have lost faith in their union leadership.
Speaker:But it should also be clear that those same workers have a tremendous opportunity, as does
Speaker:the union leadership. which I will not count myself as someone who's lost faith in the union
Speaker:leadership. But I understand the pragmatic reasons why the decisions that were made were made,
Speaker:but I will say that we have a door open to us, and all that's left for us now is to walk through
Speaker:that door. Strike through that door. So just to clarify, I heard you correctly. You consider
Speaker:yourselves in a legal strike position up until I think it's May? I believe that the union
Speaker:as of right now has been illegally put into a position to surrender our strike lines by
Speaker:the CIRB. Don't believe that position is constitutional. not to appeal to liberal constitutionality,
Speaker:but I don't believe that it is. We took a 95% strike vote. That strike vote continues to
Speaker:stand. And just because the liberals think that they can walk over the democratic rights of
Speaker:the workers, it is my point of view that the workers are still very much in a strike position.
Speaker:All that we need to do is to build the organization necessary to seize that moment. Well, I'm here
Speaker:for that. I'm reading one of the articles there this morning. It describes, the Canada Post
Speaker:statement there implies that the union has agreed to some of the points, the order. Is that correct?
Speaker:Or is that just them playing a PR game? It's my point, again, this is all my point of view.
Speaker:I haven't seen any indication that the union has agreed to any of what has been said. been
Speaker:transpired in the CIRB. Um, indeed quite the opposite. Um, what is being circulated amongst
Speaker:union leadership, not just the national executive board, but amongst other high ranking members
Speaker:of our union. Don't want to obviously give our names, but my point of view on that is that
Speaker:a lot of people consider what has happened to us to be a fundamental trampling of our constitutional
Speaker:rights and Canada Post and the bourgeois meet corporate media. Lie a lot. I feel recall when
Speaker:our strikes started it was Canada Post was saying we're preparing for a Rotating strike and that's
Speaker:just what the news Repeated that we're having a rotating strike the news in Canada Post like
Speaker:to invent narratives that they want to be true So they want it to be true that the Union has
Speaker:accepted this illegal trampling of our rights Every indication that I have seen is that the
Speaker:Union has not in any way accepted the illegal trampling of our rights, but understandably
Speaker:is put into a position where they need to be pragmatic on how they proceed. To say I'm pulling
Speaker:for you folks is an understatement because you said it yourself that we're looking, I mean,
Speaker:I'm not even a unionized worker and I'm looking to you folks for leadership and courage and
Speaker:cup W, I mean. I said it to the folks we visited on the line. I go, you guys are like the union
Speaker:we point to when we're trying to explain to people the historical value of unions. Like
Speaker:you enjoy this and this and this because of postal workers striking. And it is it's one
Speaker:of those kind of unions where if they can't do it, right, if they can't get a negotiated
Speaker:deal. you know, is that a pivotal moment for the Canadian labor movement? And we keep getting
Speaker:closer and closer to realizing that there is an actual Canadian labor movement at some of
Speaker:these community lines being held. I would like to see more of this. This should, this shouldn't
Speaker:just be a cup W issue. And it sets an awful precedent. I mean, I'll say it so you don't
Speaker:have to. I mean, the other unions out there need to be prepared to hold some of these lines
Speaker:and should have already been, should have already been anticipating this. And just like we asked
Speaker:them to hold the encampments and they promised to, I'm getting very frustrated to see, you
Speaker:know, this lack of understanding of these moments, these do or die moments that we can't let us,
Speaker:can't let them pass us by. So I mean, Sarah. Pickett, Captain, Shop Steward, and you know,
Speaker:a letter carrier. I very much appreciate your work here. I wish today was a different day,
Speaker:but I think I'm going to sit on some of the things that you said of looking towards the
Speaker:more hopeful possibilities that could come from this and that it's not over, right? We're just
Speaker:kind of in a new phase of it. And it was nice to watch people hold. hold a picket line after
Speaker:being ordered back to work. I mean, I'll just keep replaying some of those videos. Maybe
Speaker:you could go, I don't know if there's one in Ontario being held, but I think maybe you should
Speaker:go visit it if it's possible, even if it's virtually. Because yeah, the work matters still, for sure.
Speaker:Thank you very much, Sarah. Thank you. That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints
Speaker:of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the
Speaker:status quo. Please share our content and if you have the means, consider becoming a patron.
Speaker:Not only does our support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out
Speaker:to us and let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.
Speaker:No breaks, no vacation, no 40 hour week. He'd say take it or leave it and throw you out on
Speaker:the street. Kids working in sweatshops all day long. No one dared to question it. I'd say
Speaker:it was wrong. Two workers from unions stood up for what's right and gave to us all a much
Speaker:better life. Unions are the reason there's a minimum wage Weekends, vacations, lunch breaks,
Speaker:sick days Organized labor made all this come true Don't ever forget what unions did for
Speaker:you Safe work and conditions, health benefits too Unimportant insurance to help you get through
Speaker:Bad times and good times when we are as one There is no challenge we can't overcome Cause
Speaker:unions are the reason there's a minimum wage Weekends, vacations, lunch breaks and sick
Speaker:days Organized labor made all this come true Don't ever forget what unions did for you
Speaker:We're in a time that has turned back around. Once again the rich are trying to keep workers
Speaker:down. Right to work for less, Matches stay right, We deserve more respect.
Speaker:We're asking Congress to help our pension plan, but it's not a bailout, just a help in hand.
Speaker:We'll pay it back and pay it forward too, and keep workers working, that's what unions do.
Speaker:Because unions are the reason there's a minimum wage. Weekends, vacations, lunch breaks, and
Speaker:sick days.
Speaker:Don't ever forget, I have you in my stand.
Speaker:We must never forget what you have done for us.