Artwork for podcast The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
Episode 411 - More of Our Biased Commentary on Various Issues
12th December 2023 • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
00:00:00 01:11:34

Share Episode

Shownotes

In this episode we discuss:

(00:00) 411

(00:42) Intro

(05:16) Annastacia Palaszczuk

(11:54) Federal Labor Failing

(17:46) Patrons

(19:50) Terry Young

(25:36) Subs and AI

(31:35) Generational Divide

(33:01) Immigration

(35:23) Kissinger

(42:11) Covid Data

(47:38) Identity Trap Feedback

(54:57) New Zealand Rejects Race Laws

(01:10:34) Conclusion

Chapters, images & show notes powered by vizzy.fm.

To financially support the Podcast you can make:

We Livestream every Monday night at 7:30 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.

We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au



Transcripts

Speaker:

Suburban Eastern Australia, an environment that has, over time,

Speaker:

evolved some extraordinarily unique groups of homosapiens.

Speaker:

But today, we observe a small tribe akin to a group of meerkats that

Speaker:

gather together atop a small mound to watch, question, and discuss the

Speaker:

current events of their city, their country, and their world at large.

Speaker:

Let's listen keenly and observe this group fondly known as the

Speaker:

Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove.

Speaker:

We're back, episode 411, the last episode for 2023.

Speaker:

We'll get this one done and then we'll have a little break.

Speaker:

I'm Trevor, aka the Iron Fist.

Speaker:

Coming in loud and clear from regional Queensland, Scott the Velvet Glove.

Speaker:

G'day Trevor, g'day Joe, g'day listeners.

Speaker:

It's a little bit wet up here because of the cyclone that

Speaker:

is bearing down on Cairns.

Speaker:

They're expecting it to cross the coast tomorrow at 1pm.

Speaker:

In which case the rain will continue probably through

Speaker:

until the end of Thursday.

Speaker:

And Joe's in the UK, so you'd know all about rain, Joe.

Speaker:

Oh yeah, it's barely stopped since I've been here.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Tell the listener about sewerage system you were talking about earlier.

Speaker:

Yeah, so as far as I know, they don't generally have storm drains

Speaker:

here, so the water just goes straight into the sewerage system.

Speaker:

And it just isn't built for the volume of rain that they're getting these days.

Speaker:

And so they're getting more and more floods, flash flooding.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Also the amount of building, which means less soil to soak up the rain.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

More runoff into the drains.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

More runoff, modern farming practices, tractors compact the soil.

Speaker:

Basically, they're getting more and more runoff in places of

Speaker:

flooding that never used to flood.

Speaker:

And the sewage system would be failing because it's full of stormwater.

Speaker:

Yeah, the sewage system backs up and there are sewage releases.

Speaker:

Crazy.

Speaker:

And of course it's all, it's all privatised.

Speaker:

So of course they've got no incentive to improve it.

Speaker:

Yeah, sounds awful and smelly.

Speaker:

So anyway, here in Brisbane, it's lovely and sunny.

Speaker:

So anyway, if you're in the chat room, say hello.

Speaker:

Landon is in the chat room.

Speaker:

Coming in loud and clear from China, was Landon in China?

Speaker:

Beijing, okay.

Speaker:

He's in Beijing, but he's also, I think he's heading down

Speaker:

to Thailand for his holiday.

Speaker:

So I couldn't tell you I understand he's still in Beijing right now, but he could

Speaker:

be down in Chiang Mai, I don't know.

Speaker:

No doubt he'll tell us in the chat.

Speaker:

And Watley, coming in loud and clear from, I think, is it Tenterfield?

Speaker:

I think, Watley.

Speaker:

Might be your area, or I think that's it.

Speaker:

Anyway, if you're in the chat room or you come into the chat room,

Speaker:

say hello and make some comments.

Speaker:

We'll try to incorporate them if we can.

Speaker:

Often that's difficult, but hey, just make some jokes amongst yourself there.

Speaker:

Armadale is Swatly, that's right.

Speaker:

He's the international man of mystery.

Speaker:

Armadale o.

Speaker:

Given this is the last episode of the year, we can be a

Speaker:

little indulgent on this one.

Speaker:

Did I ever tell you about the coldest night of my life,

Speaker:

which was spent in Armadale?

Speaker:

Did I ever tell you that story?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

So, my wife and I were driving to Sydney, and her brother in law said,

Speaker:

Oh, you can stop at Armadale on the way.

Speaker:

His mother had moved into a nursing home and her home in Armidale was vacant, so

Speaker:

on the way down we could just call in, sleep overnight and then keep going.

Speaker:

Free accommodation.

Speaker:

We said, beauty!

Speaker:

Anyway, we got into Armidale and it was bitterly cold.

Speaker:

It was freezing and this house had been unoccupied for months, so it

Speaker:

hadn't had any heating and it was as cold inside as it was outside.

Speaker:

And anyway, it's late, it's dark, we get a quick look in the bedroom and

Speaker:

there's an electric blanket on the bed.

Speaker:

I said to my wife, fantastic, fire that up and we'll be fine.

Speaker:

Anyway, that night, I'm tossing and turning and couldn't sleep

Speaker:

because I was just still cold.

Speaker:

And in the morning eventually, you know, the sun rises and my wife wakes up and

Speaker:

I said, oh, that was a terrible night.

Speaker:

Like, that was awful.

Speaker:

It was so cold.

Speaker:

And she said, it was perfectly fine.

Speaker:

I lean over and put my arm around her.

Speaker:

She's as warm as toast.

Speaker:

And it struck me.

Speaker:

It was one of those electric blankets that had a dual So she only heated up her

Speaker:

side of the bed with the electric blanket.

Speaker:

She was as warm as toast and I froze my butt off and we were in the same bed.

Speaker:

See Trevor, you should have snuggled more.

Speaker:

That's the point.

Speaker:

That is the point.

Speaker:

So there's a lesson for you, dear listener.

Speaker:

The coldest night of my life was in Armidale in a bed

Speaker:

with an electric blanket.

Speaker:

Here we go.

Speaker:

It does seem very cold.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

All right, that was a diversion.

Speaker:

Scott, we've got a new premier in Queensland all of a

Speaker:

sudden, Anastasia Palaszczuk.

Speaker:

Resigned, Stephen Myles has got the gig, and what are your thoughts on that?

Speaker:

Well, I'm pleased she finally stepped down rather than actually

Speaker:

howling out to the very bitter end.

Speaker:

It clearly has boosted Labor's chances in the state poll.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

It's one of those things, I don't fully understand why the public turns on leaders

Speaker:

after a number of years, because she has been in that job since 2012, hasn't she?

Speaker:

Yeah, 2012.

Speaker:

You know, it's been a long time.

Speaker:

And she was just the, she was always referred to as the accidental premier

Speaker:

who, got the gig after the Labor Party was reduced to seven or eight or something

Speaker:

rather MPs, was an incredibly low number and she only got the gig because there was

Speaker:

no one else left standing, so she got it.

Speaker:

It's one of those things, now she has been quite a good Premier though, she

Speaker:

has got a number of things up that were Very divisive for a number of years.

Speaker:

She got abortion law reform through.

Speaker:

She got voluntarists dying through.

Speaker:

She got everything You know, she got through a couple of good things

Speaker:

that you can really point to in that type of thing, you know She

Speaker:

did okay during COVID pandemic.

Speaker:

Yeah, absolutely.

Speaker:

She did.

Speaker:

She's picked up a boyfriend in recent times Yeah.

Speaker:

And that's the better half is Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

The better half reckons that she's gone off the boil because of the

Speaker:

boyfriend, so I have to wait.

Speaker:

I reckon there'd be something in that.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Because she was enjoying her time, I think.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Whereas previously it was just work, work, work, work.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I actually know him.

Speaker:

I used to play frisbee.

Speaker:

Yeah, I used to play ultimate disc frisbee in this pickup game in the park,

Speaker:

and he was one of the players there.

Speaker:

So, there we go.

Speaker:

Small world, Brisbane, dear listener.

Speaker:

It is, yeah.

Speaker:

Anyway, I'm not sure Stephen Myles is the right man for the job, but you

Speaker:

know, it's one of those things, it appears to be a factional deal because

Speaker:

they're both from the same faction, so.

Speaker:

I remember speaking to somebody who has some connections in

Speaker:

the Labour Party, I won't say.

Speaker:

Her name, but I said, you know, Stephen Miles appears really stiff and, um,

Speaker:

almost robotic in his speeches in front of the camera, but apparently in real

Speaker:

life, in person, he's quite charming and personable and, and it, the strange sort

Speaker:

of robotic delivery comes in when he's in front of the camera, but when he's

Speaker:

not, he's quite a charming, intelligent.

Speaker:

Sort of character.

Speaker:

So there you go.

Speaker:

I'm sure he'll get used to it.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Well, he's used to it I think it's just a sort of a training or a mode he goes

Speaker:

into Right, but I was hopeful that this might lead to a change in the religious

Speaker:

instruction laws Because apparently when he is asked about religious instruction,

Speaker:

he kind of rolls his eyes indicating That he thinks it's a heap of rubbish.

Speaker:

And so You've given the game away here.

Speaker:

So Have you now, have you now opened him up as a target for the

Speaker:

Australian theocratic fascist lobby?

Speaker:

Maybe I have.

Speaker:

So I certainly wanted him rather than Cameron Dick, who I think is

Speaker:

quite right wing and religious.

Speaker:

The other one, Shannon Fentonham, Fentaman, would have

Speaker:

been okay as well, I think.

Speaker:

But anyway, the problem is, that it turns out that Well, those three were

Speaker:

all from the left faction, but Cameron Dick was from the right faction, so Yeah.

Speaker:

The problem is that one of the big players in this, in assisting

Speaker:

him getting in, was Grace Grace.

Speaker:

And so he's going to, he's going to owe her.

Speaker:

And I don't know if it's Grace Grace who was hanging on to Ri or

Speaker:

whether it was Anastasia Palaszczuk.

Speaker:

So, it's hard to know.

Speaker:

One of those two women were, one of those two women were behind that.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, if it was one you knew, you began to know.

Speaker:

Given Grace Grace's comments, I would suggest that she was certainly for it.

Speaker:

You'd think so.

Speaker:

Because you not remember with the Satanist thing.

Speaker:

Yeah, she went overboard, didn't she?

Speaker:

She did.

Speaker:

It was beyond what was necessary to defend a policy.

Speaker:

It wasn't, I've been versed into this position by my leadership.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

True.

Speaker:

It really wouldn't surprise me.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, initially when I heard Stephen Miles, I thought, great.

Speaker:

R.

Speaker:

I.

Speaker:

might be in the firing line, and then when I heard Grace Grace was one of

Speaker:

the key players that got him in, I was like, whoops, maybe not so good, so,

Speaker:

we'll see what happens with that one.

Speaker:

We'll just have to wait and see about that, because which

Speaker:

faction is Grace Grace from?

Speaker:

Is she from the right or left faction?

Speaker:

She's from the Old Guard, and she helped Miles, who's in the left faction, so

Speaker:

she rounded up the Old Guard faction and got them to swing behind Miles.

Speaker:

So, so yeah, that's how that worked, I believe.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's one of those things, you just gotta wonder how long those

Speaker:

loyalties and everything last.

Speaker:

If he, if he, if he gets a solid election victory under his belt and that sort of

Speaker:

thing, if he actually improves the Labor Party position in the next parliament,

Speaker:

which under Palaszczuk wasn't looking all that possible, now it could be possible.

Speaker:

If he gets, if he gets a reasonable election victory and that sort of

Speaker:

stuff under his belt, then he might be able to turn around and say, well, R.

Speaker:

I.

Speaker:

's got to go.

Speaker:

In which case, if Grace Grace was actually saying, well, I'll pull

Speaker:

the backing from them, then the rest of the rest of them might actually

Speaker:

turn around and say, no, fuck you.

Speaker:

He's done a good job for us.

Speaker:

Promote her in some different ministry.

Speaker:

She could probably have a pick of what she wants to do.

Speaker:

So, that might, if it gets her out of education and somebody else in, they

Speaker:

could approach it with a fresh set of eyes and do whatever they want to, maybe.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

We'll see how that all pans out.

Speaker:

Who knows?

Speaker:

You know, none of this has anything to do with The merits of the case and

Speaker:

whether it's a good idea to get rid of R.

Speaker:

I.

Speaker:

It's all to do with power plays and factional dealings.

Speaker:

It's factional politics.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

All the good arguments in the world are meaningless.

Speaker:

It's just who owes who a favour and who happens to be in a certain

Speaker:

position at a certain time.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Quickly on to Federal Labor.

Speaker:

There was an article in Crikey, By Guy Rundle, just sort of suggesting that

Speaker:

Labor's deserted the working man and looking at things that Federal Labor has

Speaker:

done which is good, um, comprehensive Labor law reform, there's a lot of laws

Speaker:

passed in relation to Like gig workers, treating them the same as normal workers

Speaker:

and some other good stuff there, which we haven't really got into detail about.

Speaker:

Because I haven't really come across any articles that explain it quite well.

Speaker:

So, I'll try and hunt some down.

Speaker:

The Americans weren't like that.

Speaker:

The Americans Treating gig workers as human beings.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

They weren't like that.

Speaker:

So that's one thing this government's done.

Speaker:

And they did provide some housing assistance, but it took the Greens

Speaker:

to beef that up into something more meaningful in the short term.

Speaker:

And, and they supported the minimum wage wise in the Fair Work Commission.

Speaker:

That's about it.

Speaker:

On the negative side Still haven't done anything about it at all.

Speaker:

They keep going with Stage 3 tax cuts.

Speaker:

Commitment to AUKUS.

Speaker:

Don't seem to be doing much on the environment.

Speaker:

And seem to be supporting Israel rather than, in preference to the

Speaker:

Palestinians, rather than saying there's a lot of fault on both sides here.

Speaker:

So I think that that was probably just a little bit overdone because Penny Wong

Speaker:

did actually say Israel has the right to defend themselves, but it's the way

Speaker:

in which they defend themselves that they've actually got to be careful of.

Speaker:

So I think she was actually saying you can, you know, you've got to actually

Speaker:

watch what you do and that sort of thing.

Speaker:

You've got to be careful that you're not killing as many civilians as you

Speaker:

are, but she didn't actually say it.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

She could have said, this is wrong, this genocidal campaign

Speaker:

you've got going on here.

Speaker:

You're just going too far.

Speaker:

It's just terrible.

Speaker:

What's going on there?

Speaker:

Yeah, I suppose you're right there.

Speaker:

It's just you know, Israel's not an ally or anything like that of Australia.

Speaker:

It's, they are just basically on the same Israel is not an ally of anybody.

Speaker:

No, I know that.

Speaker:

They're in Israel for Israel's sake.

Speaker:

But even if they were

Speaker:

Yeah, I know.

Speaker:

You should be able to be critical of your friends.

Speaker:

And it looks like they are not as critical as Trevor wants them to be.

Speaker:

And I also think to myself they probably could be a little more

Speaker:

critical than what they have been.

Speaker:

Well, Anthony Albanese, the younger 20 year old version, would have been far more

Speaker:

critical than the 60 year old version.

Speaker:

Yeah, for sure.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

He would have been.

Speaker:

It's just one of those things you've, you've got to accept with

Speaker:

the sweet passage of time you do mellow somewhat in your thinking

Speaker:

and People become more conservative.

Speaker:

Yeah, they do.

Speaker:

Absolutely, they do.

Speaker:

I know some Jews who have been saying how much that they feel

Speaker:

that Israel has lost its way.

Speaker:

The Israel of the 1960s, the 1970s is not the Israel of the 2000s.

Speaker:

Oh, I agree wholeheartedly with that.

Speaker:

You know, it's just one of those things.

Speaker:

Israel, you know, used to be, it used to be quite a good

Speaker:

country, that sort of thing.

Speaker:

It stood the rule of law and all that type of thing.

Speaker:

It did actually stand up for itself and it did actually put them Well

Speaker:

and truly back in their place.

Speaker:

But, with this recent Netanyahu government, you've actually got to be

Speaker:

really concerned about them because, you know, it wasn't all that long

Speaker:

ago that the streets of Tel Aviv were packed with people that are out there

Speaker:

protesting against their government.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

Where is the Israeli power?

Speaker:

Is that in Tel Aviv or is that in Jerusalem?

Speaker:

I would assume Tel Aviv.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Don't know.

Speaker:

Here's another test for Labor.

Speaker:

So there's a Productivity Commission report and it's come out and has

Speaker:

made a recommendation to remove financial reporting exemptions given

Speaker:

to thousands of religious charities.

Speaker:

So most charities are required to provide financial information and

Speaker:

basically the bigger you are, the more information you have to give.

Speaker:

And of course, religions have a certain type of privilege where

Speaker:

they're exempted from a lot of this.

Speaker:

So, basic religious charities is a term that's there and They have

Speaker:

lower reporting requirements, and there's Productivity Commission has

Speaker:

come out and said nope, should get rid of that religious exemption.

Speaker:

There's a test of secularism for the federal Labor government to see whether

Speaker:

they can come through with that.

Speaker:

You reckon they will, Scott or Joe?

Speaker:

Do you think they'll actually follow the recommendation?

Speaker:

One would hope they're going to use that as cover for themselves and say, well, the

Speaker:

Productivity Commission has required this, so we're going to go ahead and do it.

Speaker:

whAt I would have thought would be a bigger test of Labor's commitment

Speaker:

to secularism would be the religious persecution legislation, which they have

Speaker:

actually talked about bringing back.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

But allowing the religious people to persecute others.

Speaker:

Yeah, exactly.

Speaker:

Yeah, because they wouldn't be able to throw rocks at people like me and

Speaker:

call me a D and everything else, but they don't want anyone to throw rocks

Speaker:

at them for being kitty fiddlers.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

We'll see.

Speaker:

Anyway, that would be an easy one, I would have thought, to follow the

Speaker:

productivity Commission's recommendation, but I don't hold out a lot of hope.

Speaker:

We'll see what happens.

Speaker:

Look, end of year, haven't mentioned them for a while.

Speaker:

Before I forget, a big thank you to the patrons of this podcast.

Speaker:

Recently, Yam Yam Blue upgraded.

Speaker:

Thank you, Yam Yam.

Speaker:

So if you are a patron, you can always upgrade.

Speaker:

And I'll just quickly run through from the newest to the oldest

Speaker:

big thanks our 2023 new Patrons, Paige and Damien Van Schneidle.

Speaker:

From 2022 we've still got Danny, Obrad, Anti US Sentiment and Mark Lavelle.

Speaker:

From 2021, we've still got Tom, Rico, Greg P, and Shannon.

Speaker:

From 2020, we've still got Matt, Dwyer, Sue Cripp, James, who's in the chat

Speaker:

room, hello James Branwyn, Wayne, Virgil, Craig Bull, Shane, Ingram, YamYamBlue.

Speaker:

You started with us on the 5th of March, yam yam, 2020.

Speaker:

Zambuck, Lloydberg, and David Copley.

Speaker:

From 2019, we've still got John from Die Straights, who is in the chat room.

Speaker:

That's John Sammons.

Speaker:

Camille, Tom Doolan, Paul Waper, Alexander, Alan, Matthew, Craig S,

Speaker:

Glenn Bell, Professor, Dr Dentist, Murray Waper, and Andy Dowling.

Speaker:

From Still With Us, from 2018, Peter Gillespie, Gavin Ess, Daniel Curtin,

Speaker:

Liam McMahon, Dominic DeMasi, Maddock Mann, Cain Birch, Jimmy Spuds back

Speaker:

with us, Tony Wall and Steve Shinners.

Speaker:

From 2017, still with us is Alison, Ayame and Craig Gillespie and The oldest and

Speaker:

only survivor from 2016, Janelle Louise.

Speaker:

Some people choose to do it by PayPal, which is Mr T and Anne Reid and Dave

Speaker:

S from Cairns and Noel Hamilton.

Speaker:

If your name was missed and you think it shouldn't be, it would be because your

Speaker:

credit card's probably expired, hop back on and renew it, that'd be good, but

Speaker:

thank you to everybody who helps out, much appreciated, some of you have been with

Speaker:

us a long, long time, so, that's great.

Speaker:

Alright I think we are coming up to Christmas.

Speaker:

I thought I'd give you a Christmas message.

Speaker:

This one is from one of our federal politicians.

Speaker:

Terry Young, Liberal National Party, and he's got a lovely message for

Speaker:

us, with a bit of luck, here it is.

Speaker:

As this is the last full sitting week before we break for Christmas, I

Speaker:

thought it appropriate that I take the opportunity to deliver a Merry Christmas

Speaker:

message to my electorate of Longman.

Speaker:

As I have stated, Christmas is a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ.

Speaker:

Why does the birth of one baby in a small town in the Middle East, in a

Speaker:

town called Bethlehem, warrant such a celebration over 2, 000 years later?

Speaker:

Jesus existence and life is, of course, well documented, not just by Jews

Speaker:

and Christians, but by historians, whether they hold a faith or not.

Speaker:

But again, I ask the question, why all the controversy?

Speaker:

Of course, this is because of who Jesus claimed to be, which according

Speaker:

to those of the Christian faith, It has never been, and never should be, any

Speaker:

government's mandate to tell citizens what they should believe in, especially

Speaker:

when it comes to matters of faith.

Speaker:

However, for many years, Australia was a nation based

Speaker:

on Judeo Christian principles.

Speaker:

As many have said, whether you have a faith or not, the

Speaker:

Christian principles work.

Speaker:

Christian values such as keeping your word, paying your taxes,

Speaker:

being generous with your fellow man, not judging others, helping

Speaker:

those less fortunate than yourself.

Speaker:

Paying workers a fair wage for a fair day's work, and environmental

Speaker:

stewardship, just to name a few.

Speaker:

But with the slide of the Christian faith in our society, as evidenced in

Speaker:

the recent census, where for the first time there are less people who say they

Speaker:

are of the Christian faith than are not.

Speaker:

We have seen the effects of a society that doesn't have A common value

Speaker:

set and people are left to make up their own individual values.

Speaker:

We can directly correlate the decline of the Christian faith in our country

Speaker:

to increases in domestic violence, the breakdown of the family unit, drug

Speaker:

use, crime rates, basically anarchy.

Speaker:

But probably the most negative effect of this change, which is the

Speaker:

underlying cause of the increases in the issues I just mentioned before,

Speaker:

which is a society would become more inward looking than outward looking.

Speaker:

In other words, all self absorbed.

Speaker:

Perhaps this Christmas, we could ponder and reflect on this, and

Speaker:

consider others before ourselves, and consider this man Jesus, who he

Speaker:

claimed to be and what he taught.

Speaker:

A man after whom even our history's timeline is measured.

Speaker:

There you go, that's in our Federal Parliament, that's

Speaker:

the calibre of discussion.

Speaker:

It all started to fall apart at the point where he said, Jesus is well documented.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And everything from that point on just fell over.

Speaker:

Yeah, that was the one.

Speaker:

That was, strangely enough, one of the things that got me the most as well.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I cannot believe that someone would actually say Australia Judeo Christian.

Speaker:

It's one of those things, it's not a, it's not even a real term, as I understand it.

Speaker:

I think you did actually expose on that, didn't you, at some stage, Trevor?

Speaker:

There was some discussion of a Judeo Christian not being a real term.

Speaker:

It's one of those things, it's that it's clear that the Right wing Christian

Speaker:

nutters have overtaken the LNP, but then their talking points seem to be

Speaker:

coming direct from Fox News in the U.

Speaker:

S.

Speaker:

Mm, the term, the expression Judeo Christian we did, it like, it doesn't

Speaker:

appear in Hansard until around 1980 or something like that and then just

Speaker:

gradually, I think Howard, well Howard's probably before 1980 was, anyway,

Speaker:

during the Howard era, he was big on pushing this idea of Judeo Christian

Speaker:

and it, It came to be accepted as a common sort of expression but it never

Speaker:

existed prior to 1970 in Hansard.

Speaker:

It hadn't been mentioned at all.

Speaker:

It's an American idea because the Jewish lobby is powerful in America.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And so it was an acceptance of Judaism rather than the pogroms that they'd

Speaker:

done for the last 2, 000 years.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And I think it was to sort of also avoid claims of anti

Speaker:

Semitism at the time as well, so.

Speaker:

Probably.

Speaker:

Yeah, so, just what a load of Imagine, you've got a chance

Speaker:

to speak in Parliament, and that's the best you can do.

Speaker:

For goodness sake.

Speaker:

Yeah, that was a load of shit, wasn't it?

Speaker:

Mmm.

Speaker:

Hey, can you imagine If an atheist stood up and said, of course, all

Speaker:

that's wrong with society is the religious nutters, and, you know,

Speaker:

society has proved ever since less and less people believe in religion.

Speaker:

Ah.

Speaker:

One of the things I found most disturbing that he listed amongst the

Speaker:

whole evidence of sly and that sort of stuff was marriage breakdowns.

Speaker:

And I thought to myself, yeah, okay, so you want everything

Speaker:

back in the 1960s, do you?

Speaker:

You have to prove that someone did something wrong to you so you can go out

Speaker:

there and actually attack them and that sort of stuff and get an at fault divorce.

Speaker:

You know, it's just all garbage, wasn't it?

Speaker:

And then have the social stigma to deal with.

Speaker:

Even when it was legal, you still didn't want to get divorced.

Speaker:

I know that.

Speaker:

Anyway, that's some of the fine minds we've got operating in our

Speaker:

federal government at the moment.

Speaker:

Same group of people.

Speaker:

Well, thankfully, they're in a federal position, but anyway.

Speaker:

Same group of people responsible for our submarine disaster.

Speaker:

And yes, dear listener, we've got a little submarine article here.

Speaker:

This one have a listen to this.

Speaker:

Artificial intelligence, AI, drones, and deep space radar are among the

Speaker:

technologies that will be used by Australia and its AUKUS allies.

Speaker:

To counter China's aggression in the Pacific, Australia's Defence

Speaker:

Minister, Richard Marles, met with his counterparts from the United

Speaker:

States and the UK to announce the second pillar of the AUKUS deal.

Speaker:

First pillar being subs themselves.

Speaker:

And it goes on, While Australia's planned acquisition of nuclear powered submarines

Speaker:

has been the main focus, the second pillar focuses on advanced technologies.

Speaker:

AI technology will be used on systems.

Speaker:

including on the Poseidon aircraft, to process information from

Speaker:

sonoboys which detect and transmit underwater data, to improve our

Speaker:

anti submarine warfare capabilities, according to a joint statement.

Speaker:

I don't know about you, but when Our Defence Minister starts announcing that

Speaker:

AI is going to have the capacity to really improve our, our anti submarine capacity,

Speaker:

anti submarine warfare capabilities.

Speaker:

Do you think to yourself, gee, I wonder if the Chinese will be any good at

Speaker:

developing AI and to do exactly the same to 368 billion worth of AI Submarines?

Speaker:

Oh, exactly.

Speaker:

It'll be like the chatbot.

Speaker:

It'll give you false indications of activity with a high

Speaker:

probability of assurance.

Speaker:

I'm quite sceptical of the capacity of AI, but, you know,

Speaker:

I'm open to being Persuaded.

Speaker:

But if you accept that it's true, then you have to accept that the other

Speaker:

side will be doing the same thing, and perhaps you shouldn't be putting

Speaker:

all the eggs in the mud basket.

Speaker:

Exactly, and they will be developing countermeasures and all that sort of stuff

Speaker:

to defend their own fleet against it.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

So I just think it's a load of nonsense.

Speaker:

What do you think of AI generally?

Speaker:

Sorry, Scott, go on.

Speaker:

The whole Sabre rattling over China is getting out of hand.

Speaker:

Because you once used to say it was just on the Coalition side.

Speaker:

Now it's getting out of there and to the Labor side.

Speaker:

You know, it's One of those things that is getting out of hand and I think to myself,

Speaker:

you know, I know you and I disagree over Taiwan, but it's one of those things I

Speaker:

think we should use our position as a good friend of China and a good friend of the

Speaker:

United States to get them to talk about Taiwan and actually get into the Taiwanese

Speaker:

ears and actually say, well, if you agree to give up If you agree to give up your

Speaker:

claims out of the South China Sea, you agree to give up any historic claims to

Speaker:

any part of China, then we might be able to get you moving towards some sort of

Speaker:

diplomatic recognition on the other side.

Speaker:

Because it's, it's one of those things, it's is for all intents

Speaker:

and purposes its own country.

Speaker:

Now I know it's, I know it's still technically part of China and that sort

Speaker:

of stuff, but It doesn't look like that.

Speaker:

It's got its own currency.

Speaker:

It's got its own way of doing things.

Speaker:

It is basically its own country now, and it has developed.

Speaker:

It has evolved from a military dictatorship under the Kuomintang,

Speaker:

which was headed by Chiang Kai shek.

Speaker:

That was a military dictatorship there.

Speaker:

It was a dictatorship for a very long time, and it wasn't only until the

Speaker:

old timers and that sort of stuff voted them out in their parliament.

Speaker:

But they have evolved into a democracy now.

Speaker:

And I honestly don't believe that they would be particularly happy with having

Speaker:

to live under Chinese rule because they don't want the facial recognition

Speaker:

cameras and all that sort of stuff set up exactly the way have to in China.

Speaker:

Anyway, democracy's over democracy's overrated Scott.

Speaker:

But, but anyway.

Speaker:

Joe, Joe AI as our resident tech guy.

Speaker:

What are your thoughts of artificial intelligence?

Speaker:

Because it's sort of the flavour of the month in the sort of podcasting

Speaker:

world that I listen to, which is all about how to make and promote and do

Speaker:

podcasting and I keep saying AI is going to change all of these things.

Speaker:

You got any thoughts on AI?

Speaker:

It's, it's a wooly term.

Speaker:

It's been around for a long time.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

. And it's always been just around the corner.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

. The, the current flavor is large language models, which effectively use

Speaker:

past history to predict the future.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

, and, and it's quite good at doing certain things.

Speaker:

So if you want to generate a wall of text that sounds reasonable.

Speaker:

It's great if you want factual information.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

It's fairly hit and miss.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

And again, with the, the painting, it takes previous paintings and is able

Speaker:

to predict what a painting that you ask it to look like would look like.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

And then it adds and subtracts or subtracts from random noise, actually.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

until it gets the painting that it, it envisages.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

It, it's a tool unlike any other tool.

Speaker:

It will have some advantages, but I don't think it's the panacea

Speaker:

that everyone keeps growing about.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

So reading between the lines, it's being a bit oversold at the moment.

Speaker:

Oh absolutely, as is most new technology.

Speaker:

Good to know, Joe the tech guy.

Speaker:

All right we've often spoken about, uh, the generational divide in our

Speaker:

voting and that, well, you mentioned earlier just now, Scott, how people get

Speaker:

more conservative as they get older.

Speaker:

And, but it's becoming really pronounced here in Australia, but in the UK, I

Speaker:

came across this article talking about a YouGov opinion poll data from 2018, and

Speaker:

what they were looking at was how people voted if you're over the age of if only

Speaker:

people over 65 were allowed to vote, the Labor Party would be all but wiped out.

Speaker:

This is based on 2018 data, whereas if only Britain's under 25s MPs whatsoever.

Speaker:

So, let me just show you on the screen what it would look like in terms of the

Speaker:

difference under 25s versus Over 65s.

Speaker:

And it's such a dramatic voting pattern based on age.

Speaker:

So, that's happening all over the world, and that was just a representation

Speaker:

of what's happening in the UK.

Speaker:

I haven't seen anything similar for Australia.

Speaker:

I'd be interested to see if there's data like that for Australia.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

That's that one.

Speaker:

Not a lot to say, except hmm.

Speaker:

And another one here, just, we've been talking about

Speaker:

immigration and housing lately.

Speaker:

And there's lots of talk about the increase in immigration numbers.

Speaker:

And there's a chart on the screen that is showing you the immigration

Speaker:

numbers, um, produced by the Guardian, sources the Australian

Speaker:

Bureau of Statistics, and obviously negative during the COVID pandemic,

Speaker:

and largely a big increase since.

Speaker:

Effectively, the argument in the article is that despite the huge

Speaker:

boom in recent years in immigration, you've got to remember there was

Speaker:

a huge decrease during COVID.

Speaker:

So our current immigration level is pretty much what was expected say back in 2018,

Speaker:

looking forward where we would have had in terms of immigration over the next,

Speaker:

I'm curious as to what happened in COVID, did people actually leave, or was this

Speaker:

citizens who couldn't get back, or?

Speaker:

Well, people did leave, like all those foreign students left.

Speaker:

Back to China?

Speaker:

But were, yeah, but they weren't citizens, were they?

Speaker:

No, but that's part of our immigration on temporary visas.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's one of those things, you've actually got to look at it as a whole lot.

Speaker:

And the immigrants were a total group in the, in the, as part of

Speaker:

our population, and a number of them did leave during COVID, because they

Speaker:

wanted to be back home and that type of thing, where they've I don't know,

Speaker:

they probably possibly felt safer and that sort of stuff being at home.

Speaker:

Well, they weren't getting any assistance here.

Speaker:

We were just leaving people in the lurch and saying, if you can't

Speaker:

get back to your own country, well, we're not going to help you.

Speaker:

So people had to make it back.

Speaker:

Anyway, so, so yeah, that was that one.

Speaker:

And, and sort of blaming high immigration for our current housing crisis.

Speaker:

is ignoring that fact that we're pretty much at the immigration level we

Speaker:

should have been, um, or what we were expecting it to be prior to the pandemic.

Speaker:

And so it's complicated.

Speaker:

There's all sorts of factors going in there.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Henry Kissinger.

Speaker:

He died.

Speaker:

Any thoughts on Henry Kissinger?

Speaker:

Is it rest in peace or good riddance, Scott or Jane?

Speaker:

I think it's a bit of good riddance, you know, because if you look at what

Speaker:

he actually was involved in and that sort of stuff, Southeast Asia is a Hell

Speaker:

of a, has got a hell of a lot fewer citizens because of Kissinger's behavior.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

You know, he was the one behind the bombing campaign.

Speaker:

It in Cambodia.

Speaker:

He really did fuck that country up very badly.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

You know, it, it's one of those things like, you know, they reckon

Speaker:

that the Kah Rous was a, a direct result of the US bombing campaign.

Speaker:

Well, that wouldn't surprise me.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

And then, you know, the assistance for Cambodia or.

Speaker:

Kampuchea, as it was called then, was from Vietnam, and because they got their,

Speaker:

because they got their help from the wrong side of the Cold War, the Yanks turned

Speaker:

around and said, no, you can't have that.

Speaker:

So they poured military aid and that sort of stuff into

Speaker:

the hands of the Khmer Rouge.

Speaker:

Well, Jesus Christ, you know, that was ridiculous.

Speaker:

And clearly Kissinger's fingerprints were all over that.

Speaker:

And years afterwards, when the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge were well known.

Speaker:

America was still recognising the Khmer Rouge as the legitimate

Speaker:

government in Cambridgeshire.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, so he was secretary of state and national security advisor to

Speaker:

both President Nixon and President Ford from 69 to 77, but he was this

Speaker:

informal advisor to lots of presidents, including Reagan and Clinton.

Speaker:

The two bushes and Donald Trump, a notable exception to Kissinger's influence in

Speaker:

Washington was the Carter administration.

Speaker:

And you know, not, not only was it filthy foreigners that got killed by him.

Speaker:

mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

It was alleged that during the Paris Peace Talks where a piece was on the cards.

Speaker:

Apparently he said, no, no if, if you don't sign up to this peace accord, you'll

Speaker:

get a bit better deal in the future so that he could win the election or rather

Speaker:

his president could win the election.

Speaker:

Correct.

Speaker:

This is in terms of the Vietnam War.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And extending the Vietnam War.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Quite clear evidence that he was Costing thousands of American lives.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

According to this article from the Young Menagerie blog, I think

Speaker:

it was, kissinger's record as a warmonger is bloody indeed,

Speaker:

includes encouraging Indonesia's President Suharto to kill up to 1.

Speaker:

2 million alleged communists in purges he advocated the illegal carpet bombing in

Speaker:

Cambodia, um, advised Pakistan's President to crush an aspiring political movement.

Speaker:

Seeking autonomy for East Pakistan, he encouraged Cejado to invade East

Speaker:

Timor, giving the green light to a neo fascist military junta to overthrow

Speaker:

Argentina's Isabel Perón, and schemed with a cabal of Latin American neo

Speaker:

fascist dictators to assassinate their political foes in Operation Condor.

Speaker:

Famously said about Chile, you know, there's no way the United States are going

Speaker:

to put up with a bunch of communists.

Speaker:

I'm going to do something about it.

Speaker:

So, got rid of TND.

Speaker:

TND.

Speaker:

He openly called for the invasion of Iraq, supported the invasion of Afghanistan,

Speaker:

and on the good side, Kissinger wanted to normalise relations with China.

Speaker:

So if you wanted to say something positive about him.

Speaker:

He was involved in the normalization of relations with China.

Speaker:

I think that was inevitable because China was such a large country that

Speaker:

it was, it was going to, it was going to throw off the shackles of poverty

Speaker:

and that sort of stuff eventually.

Speaker:

Something that was that big, you couldn't keep down forever.

Speaker:

It was going to grow, and with growth comes economic growth, and then they were

Speaker:

going to end up being what they are today.

Speaker:

So I honestly believe that it would have been very foolish for the Yanks not to

Speaker:

get on board with that, because that would have just, it would have made them

Speaker:

look ridiculous if they were, if they were trying to ignore the legitimate

Speaker:

government of the People's Republic of China, and saying, well, you're not really

Speaker:

the legitimate government, the legitimate government is the Republic of China.

Speaker:

You know, it's one of those things I just think Funnily enough,

Speaker:

China was kind of like the buggy man it is today, in a sense.

Speaker:

But, Yeah, it was, it was.

Speaker:

Because, you know, they got involved, they got involved in that war between

Speaker:

the North and the South of North and South Korea and that sort of stuff.

Speaker:

And they took the Yanks to the brink of defeat.

Speaker:

But the Yanks actually held their line and that sort of stuff.

Speaker:

And they ended up settling over the 38th parallel.

Speaker:

Anyway, Gough Whitlam.

Speaker:

Independently reopened relations between Australia and China and would it have

Speaker:

been Billy McMahon was the liberal leader at the time basically accused Whitlam of

Speaker:

being a foolish commie sympathiser and then unbeknownst to them Kissinger was

Speaker:

smoothing the way for Nixon to appear and go over there and smooth relations and

Speaker:

the Liberal Party looked like a bunch of idiots because they were criticising Goff.

Speaker:

And then, within 12 months, there was the US doing exactly what Goff had been

Speaker:

doing, so, So that was, um, Kissinger, Goff Whitlam, China, in that story.

Speaker:

Paul Keating came out and made some favourable remarks

Speaker:

about Kissinger, so Did he?

Speaker:

Yes, yep so, again, it was to do with China, because Keating worked with

Speaker:

Kissinger in the China Development Bank, which underwrote new Chinese

Speaker:

city plans, so, possibly because it was on the topic of China that he

Speaker:

felt favourably to him, but towards him, but yeah, Keating came out with

Speaker:

some positive words for Kissinger.

Speaker:

Yeah, and the other thing, if you're looking for something positive as well,

Speaker:

is that according to former Australian diplomat Tony Kevin, Kissinger was

Speaker:

sympathetic towards Russia's perspective on Ukraine, that becoming a member of

Speaker:

NATO would compromise Russia's security, and he virtually predicted the Russian

Speaker:

invasion if things did not improve.

Speaker:

There you go.

Speaker:

Right, COVID.

Speaker:

You still get people today talking about, ah, it's at a function on Sunday, and

Speaker:

maybe it was because Palaszczuk, at that point, had announced her resignation and

Speaker:

just, again, it was an older crowd who were just really ready to bag, uh, what

Speaker:

had happened in terms of quarantining and, and our response to COVID in Australia.

Speaker:

And I didn't, I held back because I was a good guest.

Speaker:

I don't always have to rant.

Speaker:

Sometimes I do bite my tongue and held back, but I wanted to say.

Speaker:

What the fuck do you think happened in other countries?

Speaker:

Like, there were, the excess death rates in other countries was huge, and they

Speaker:

had huge problems, and particularly if you're in Queensland, it wasn't

Speaker:

the most unpleasant experience.

Speaker:

And the whole point was, we waited until a vaccine came, and we got one, and

Speaker:

then we could reopen, and, you know.

Speaker:

Yeah, because it would have less of an impact.

Speaker:

Yeah, so, even with hindsight looking at it, All perfectly made sense to do what

Speaker:

was done and these people want to go, Oh, what a big, what a big hullabaloo

Speaker:

they have enough than that was, you know, why did we go through all that?

Speaker:

And, and we wouldn't do that again.

Speaker:

And I'm thinking, well, if, if thousands, tens of thousands of people

Speaker:

are dying and you might have to wait 18 months or two years for a vaccine.

Speaker:

Well, yeah, we would do the same again, so anyway, I've got a chart to show

Speaker:

you, which is a comparison of the OECD countries health system spending during

Speaker:

the, uh, two years from 2020 to 2022.

Speaker:

So really the, the main first two years of the COVID pandemic.

Speaker:

I'll put that up and here it is.

Speaker:

So this is spending on health care, hmm, maybe can I make that bigger?

Speaker:

Joe's disappeared, hasn't he?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah, okay.

Speaker:

Let me just look at my version.

Speaker:

Australia increased spending by 1.

Speaker:

7 percent above what we would normally have spent, and the average was 9%.

Speaker:

So in terms of spending.

Speaker:

On extra on health, on health care marginal 1.

Speaker:

7 percent more than we normally would have.

Speaker:

The average was 9 percent more.

Speaker:

So, in terms of spending, but then going to the excess deaths and in

Speaker:

terms of Australia, the red one down the bottom there, excess deaths of 4.

Speaker:

4%, whereas the average was 14%.

Speaker:

And so we got a really good, um, result compared to other countries in the OECD.

Speaker:

And just, you know, don't want to give us enough credit for,

Speaker:

for the way that was handled.

Speaker:

and, you know, it didn't always relate to the, the The measures that were

Speaker:

taken, or the money that was spent.

Speaker:

So, Mexico had the lowest health system spending, and the

Speaker:

highest excess mortality rate.

Speaker:

JaPan Spent less than expected on health care, but had a great

Speaker:

low excess mortality rate.

Speaker:

But that's to do with cultural issues in Japan, so an already healthy population,

Speaker:

mask wearing before the pandemic.

Speaker:

It's fairly normal and all that sort of stuff in Japan.

Speaker:

Extensive vaccination uptake, free medical care, and just social

Speaker:

compliance with public health measures.

Speaker:

So, there were You know cultural issues that were at play there.

Speaker:

So, so yeah, do you guys come across?

Speaker:

Have you ever seen the Tim Minchin Beat Poem Storm, talking about

Speaker:

being a good guest at your party?

Speaker:

No, what is he saying?

Speaker:

So he's at a dinner party, and there's a hippie there who's making all sorts of

Speaker:

assertions, and he has a bit of a rant.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

And I can just see you doing the same thing, so And he, and he's

Speaker:

doing it at a dinner party, is he?

Speaker:

At a dinner party, yeah.

Speaker:

Well, you see, I, I, I think I can read the room and decide whether it Okay.

Speaker:

Now's the time or not, so, you know.

Speaker:

And it's whether it's the host who's making the outrageous allegation

Speaker:

or whether it's Another guest.

Speaker:

That's one of the factors to take into account.

Speaker:

So, oh yeah there we go.

Speaker:

Landon in the chat room says, I got COVID in December 2020.

Speaker:

16 days in bed with fever and feeling like death.

Speaker:

I couldn't go to a doctor because they'd have carted me off to a fever hospital.

Speaker:

Okay, well, that's in China where you were compulsorily sent to a fever hospital.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

Okay, and I think they're mentioning that Kissinger went out with

Speaker:

Candice Bergman at one stage.

Speaker:

Really?

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

Quite an age difference there, wasn't it?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Last week, I did a thing on the Identity Trap by Sasha Monk.

Speaker:

Sorry about the editing on that.

Speaker:

I was using Descript.

Speaker:

And it was a little bit harsh and a few things got chopped out.

Speaker:

And I did it on a device down the Gold Coast, so when I'm back on the Gold Coast,

Speaker:

if I've got time, I'll just go back to the original file and only just edit it

Speaker:

a bit lighter, because I noticed that some words got chopped off, but anyway.

Speaker:

Got some feedback.

Speaker:

One writer wrote, Hi Trevor, I've started listening to your episode on

Speaker:

identity, and I'm afraid you really seem to be seeking out Just the information

Speaker:

which reaffirms your own beliefs.

Speaker:

Well, couple of thoughts on that.

Speaker:

I never have that criticism when I bag religion, submarines, boomer

Speaker:

friendly taxes, the LNP, Trump, etc.

Speaker:

But I've had it a few times when it comes to the voice.

Speaker:

And so, if you feel that way with the voice, where we disagree, but not

Speaker:

on issues where we agree, Then that says something about you, not me.

Speaker:

So, I think what happens with The Voice is people don't like my argument, they

Speaker:

disagree with it and then start looking at things like whether I'm grabbing

Speaker:

information that just reaffirms my own beliefs and complaining about

Speaker:

it, yet they won't complain when I do that on every other topic,

Speaker:

where they happen to agree with it.

Speaker:

So Consistency, ladies and gentlemen is important.

Speaker:

And and this wasn't one where I actually was seeking out the information.

Speaker:

This actually just fell in my lap because Yasha Monk was interviewed

Speaker:

on Late Night Live with Philip Adams.

Speaker:

So if you want to hear more from him go on to Late Night Live with Philip Adams.

Speaker:

And even later in this episode, I'm going to be talking about articles

Speaker:

by Ross Stitt and Chris Trotter.

Speaker:

Looking at the Maori situation in New Zealand, and you know, I didn't, I'm not

Speaker:

here, that came from the John Menendee blog, so I don't sit at their computer

Speaker:

and Google find me left wingers who have turned against identity politics or

Speaker:

something like that, it's just whether they come across my newsfeed or not,

Speaker:

but of course I'd be filtering the newsfeed and I might well see things

Speaker:

that, are contrary to the argument I want to perhaps persuade you.

Speaker:

I don't really actually want to persuade people about The Voice.

Speaker:

I just want to say that there is an alternative thought process there.

Speaker:

I don't really care whether people agree or not.

Speaker:

I'm not trying to persuade, but the point is this is a podcast.

Speaker:

This is not a court of law or a commission of inquiry.

Speaker:

And provided I'm not misrepresenting the other side, I don't have to preach for the

Speaker:

other side and give you the full nuts and bolts of what the other side is saying.

Speaker:

I can simply summarise briefly what their position is and then go as

Speaker:

long as I like in encountering it.

Speaker:

It's a goddamn personal podcast for God's sake.

Speaker:

Sorry, Joe.

Speaker:

But I, I, I, I think with the voice and with a lot of other things.

Speaker:

Where identity politics are in play, it's been very much a misrepresentation

Speaker:

of the other side as racist.

Speaker:

It's been lazy argumentation, it hasn't been a good, these are the

Speaker:

real reasons you need the voice.

Speaker:

It's been a, if you don't vote for the voice, you must be a racist.

Speaker:

And that's just lazy argumentation.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Like my motivations, my motivations.

Speaker:

are irrelevant, so what does it matter if I'm seeking out information which affirms

Speaker:

my beliefs, if in fact the information is correct and the arguments are sound?

Speaker:

You know, that's the important point.

Speaker:

Is it actually a sound argument?

Speaker:

Deal with those issues, dear listener.

Speaker:

If you feel compelled to write in and criticise, Then don't waste time

Speaker:

questioning my motives or my biases, because sure, I've got a bias on

Speaker:

issues, and sure, I've got motivations, but what's it matter if I'm right?

Speaker:

So, deal with the substantive issues.

Speaker:

Nobody has, except Liam, who came on the podcast and gave a good account of, uh, Of

Speaker:

himself and his you know, we ran through issues and that was genuinely the only

Speaker:

time where somebody has attempted to deal with the issues rather than deal with,

Speaker:

um, aspersions on character or motivations so yeah but if you are going to send your

Speaker:

criticisms, a quick warning is I'm losing patience, I'm, I'm going to be abrupt and

Speaker:

less gentle than I used to be, you know.

Speaker:

It's kind of like where I got to with The Twelfth Man, where I just

Speaker:

got less gentle with The Twelfth Man after a while, and he got, he sort of

Speaker:

felt that, I think, and I've kind of reached that point where I'm going to

Speaker:

be more abrupt and less gentle, so.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Well, it's one of those things, I don't think you're abrupt with me,

Speaker:

you know, even though you and I both disagree in the voice and that type

Speaker:

of thing, it's just that I could see where you were coming from.

Speaker:

I could understand your arguments and that sort of stuff, but

Speaker:

I didn't agree with them.

Speaker:

Perfectly fine.

Speaker:

Yeah, that was, and that was principally because I was looking at

Speaker:

it from a different point of view.

Speaker:

I was looking at it from a more emotional point of view, I think,

Speaker:

more so than anything else.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

You had a different priority.

Speaker:

Oops.

Speaker:

Yeah, exactly.

Speaker:

And I didn't think you were racist or anything else.

Speaker:

It's just and that is what I found very disappointing about the yes side

Speaker:

because Joe was bang on the money there.

Speaker:

That you said that the arguments from the yes case was, well, if you're not

Speaker:

voting no, if you're voting no, you're obviously racist, which is nonsense.

Speaker:

You know, it's, if it was all racist and that sort of stuff that we're voting

Speaker:

that way, then you'd have to look at

Speaker:

you'd have to look at some, you'd have to conclude that around about 60 70

Speaker:

percent of the population is racist.

Speaker:

Which is the really sad thing is that people are prepared to conclude that.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Which I don't think that we are.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

You know, we do have some issues around race in this country.

Speaker:

There's no point denying that, but I do not believe that you would be that racist

Speaker:

to say this is you could actually say that we are racist based on that vote.

Speaker:

Maybe New Zealand is full of racists.

Speaker:

We're going to talk about New Zealand now.

Speaker:

It's quite interesting what's been going on over there.

Speaker:

So, the country's new coalition government was sworn in and said that it's going

Speaker:

to review the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, which upholds Maori

Speaker:

rights, including the right to autonomy.

Speaker:

So the government has announced at least a dozen policies that provide

Speaker:

for Maori will be repealed or reviewed.

Speaker:

Bunch of racists over there.

Speaker:

Must be.

Speaker:

They voted for a government that went into an election willing to remove race

Speaker:

based policies that favoured the Maori.

Speaker:

Have you heard anybody Have you heard anybody complaining about what a

Speaker:

black mark this was on New Zealand's character that they elected these guys?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

But who knows of any famous Kiwis?

Speaker:

Well, all famous Kiwis eventually become famous Australians.

Speaker:

Don't they?

Speaker:

Well, there is that.

Speaker:

We co opt them.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

So, announcing the changes on Friday, Luxon, the Prime Minister, said voters

Speaker:

wanted services provided on the basis of need, not race, and he was strengthening

Speaker:

democracy for all New Zealanders.

Speaker:

Bunch of racists must have voted for a guy who'd say that.

Speaker:

So the Treaty of Waitangi is an agreement reached in 1840

Speaker:

between the British and the Maori.

Speaker:

While it is not a legal document, it forms New Zealand's

Speaker:

constitution and its principles.

Speaker:

Which include the right of Maori for self determination and the protection of Maori

Speaker:

interests are woven into legislation.

Speaker:

This began in the 1970s with the establishment of the Waitangi Tribunal,

Speaker:

a commission of inquiry that investigates treaty breaches by the Crown.

Speaker:

Now, I'm not sure where I got that statement from.

Speaker:

I think this was from the Guardian.

Speaker:

As to what the Treaty of Waitangi says, I'm going to be quoting

Speaker:

from a guy called Chris Trotter Who is a lefty in New Zealand.

Speaker:

I think he's kind of like a Guy Rundle New Zealand's version of a Guy Rundle

Speaker:

and he Argues it seems to me that the Treaty of Waitangi did not talk about

Speaker:

cooperative government Can you possibly imagine a bunch of white fellows

Speaker:

who thought the Maori were savages?

Speaker:

can you possibly contemplate that they would have signed a treaty that

Speaker:

allowed for cooperative governance?

Speaker:

He says it doesn't do that, but anyway, no doubt there are lots

Speaker:

of different opinions on that one.

Speaker:

New Zealand let me just go into, so, from the John Menardew blog, I came

Speaker:

across this article by Ross Stitt.

Speaker:

Just came across my news feed, didn't actively seek it out, but of course when

Speaker:

I saw it I thought that's interesting and that's relevant to our discussion here.

Speaker:

So, he said that, You know, The Voice was a disaster for the Labor

Speaker:

government, Anthony Albanese.

Speaker:

But events in the Middle East, the interest rate hikes, the High

Speaker:

Court decision on immigration detention, cost of living crisis.

Speaker:

Basically provided a distraction from that loss.

Speaker:

Scott, would you agree with that?

Speaker:

Like, does it seem, other than on this podcast, where I'm just out beating

Speaker:

the drum still, occasionally, sort of, it's done and dusted as an issue,

Speaker:

largely, and people have moved on and there has been a series of sort of

Speaker:

biggish news items that have pushed it.

Speaker:

Into the far reaches of people's memories?

Speaker:

Yeah, I think it is.

Speaker:

I think it has been basically forgotten by the public and that sort of thing.

Speaker:

It's just one of those things, clearly the government has been

Speaker:

bruised by it, so they've got to get on, dust themselves off and move on.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

So when asked about his commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart on the 15th

Speaker:

of October, Um, Albanese expressed his respect for the outcome of the referendum.

Speaker:

There was no mention of treaty or truth telling and no doubt the a LP strategists

Speaker:

are currently considering their, considering their political options.

Speaker:

It would be surprising if they weren't also analysing New

Speaker:

Zealand's latest election.

Speaker:

The rights of the Maori population featured in the campaign and the

Speaker:

subsequent negotiations led to the country's new coalition comprising

Speaker:

the National Party, Libertarian ACT Party and the NZ First Party, uh,

Speaker:

according to this article by Ross Stitt.

Speaker:

The previous Labor government, which was Jacinda Ardern before she

Speaker:

resigned and then her replacement, took many steps aimed at improving the

Speaker:

lives of Indigenous New Zealanders.

Speaker:

This included establishing a separate Maori Health Authority

Speaker:

commissioning a report on meeting the goals of the UN Declaration on

Speaker:

the Rights of Indigenous People and promoting the use of Maori language.

Speaker:

And pursuing co governance, the sharing of certain governance arrangements

Speaker:

between Maori and non Maori.

Speaker:

So, according to Ross Stitt, many of these steps proved controversial

Speaker:

and were opposed during the election by the parties that ultimately won.

Speaker:

And the support for the Jacinda Ardern Labor government, I can't remember the

Speaker:

name of her Its support crashed from 50% in 2020 to 27 percent in that election.

Speaker:

That's a huge crash, Scott.

Speaker:

50 down to 27 percent is a lot.

Speaker:

There are many explanations for the wipeout, but significant sections

Speaker:

of the Kiwi electorate rejected Labor's progressive agenda on Maori

Speaker:

issues, and this was articulated by Chris Trotter, one of New Zealand's

Speaker:

leading left wing political analysts.

Speaker:

In an article titled, Losing the Working Class.

Speaker:

And Trotter argues that the co governance initiative was a crucial

Speaker:

catalyst for electoral defeat.

Speaker:

And You didn't see my message?

Speaker:

We can hear you there.

Speaker:

Hang on a second, Joe.

Speaker:

I'm going to mute Joe, because he's Yeah, probably half an hour or so.

Speaker:

Now I've muted Joe, he's having a private conversation.

Speaker:

Where was I?

Speaker:

What happened was Trotter contends that as a result, when the Labor government

Speaker:

of Jacinda Ardern moved forward with Indigenous co governance, the sovereignty

Speaker:

grenade finally exploded, and Labor discovered what it would take to make

Speaker:

the working class stop voting for it.

Speaker:

And what else did he say here?

Speaker:

Significantly, the leaders of both ACT, A C T, and New Zealand First, so these

Speaker:

are the two of the parties in this new coalition in New Zealand, the leaders

Speaker:

of two of those parties, guess what?

Speaker:

They're Maori.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Interesting.

Speaker:

I guess people would treat them like a Jacinta, Nampy, Jimba, Pryce.

Speaker:

They're obviously, yeah, they're obviously coconuts.

Speaker:

Just they're not, not the right type of Maori.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Given the voice referendum and the Kiwi election, ALB strategists might worry that

Speaker:

pursuing too progressive an Indigenous agenda in Australia could alienate many

Speaker:

of the traditional working class voters.

Speaker:

So basically saying, based on what's happened in New Zealand, Labor would

Speaker:

have to tread carefully in Australia if it pursues things like Treaty Your.

Speaker:

Self determination.

Speaker:

Yeah, which I agree wholeheartedly with them on, because it's just that if they

Speaker:

were to actually pursue that line Then they would potentially be wiped out

Speaker:

because the coalition would actually say, no, we're not going to go that far.

Speaker:

Yeah, it's probably why Palaszczuk decided to abandon the whole treaty

Speaker:

negotiations up here because the coalition had politicized its response to the

Speaker:

voice, which let the opposition leader, Christopher Foley, the option that he

Speaker:

could actually attack the Labour Party over the negotiations on a treaty.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

She cleverly said.

Speaker:

Well, unless you get bipartisan support for these things,

Speaker:

there's no point pursuing it.

Speaker:

And the LNP is not going to come to the party, so we're not even going to bother.

Speaker:

Which is a very clever political move.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

All right.

Speaker:

Which is precisely what Albanese should have done with the voice.

Speaker:

He should have actually said, look, we can't proceed with it because the

Speaker:

coalition's going to say no, you guys work on the coalition, get them to

Speaker:

over the line and that sort of stuff to say, yes, then we'll pursue it then.

Speaker:

Maybe people wouldn't have believed him.

Speaker:

I think, you remember the opinion polls were 60 40 in the

Speaker:

beginning, so it probably needed that defeat to convince people.

Speaker:

He could say it now, when it comes to treaty, or other sorts

Speaker:

of self determination things.

Speaker:

He could run the argument and people would believe him, but I don't, maybe

Speaker:

they wouldn't have believed him before.

Speaker:

So, one final thing on the Maori is that atheism is on the rise.

Speaker:

This is an article from The Conversation.

Speaker:

And the study was a particularly small sample size, so it was more about

Speaker:

qualitative rather than quantitative.

Speaker:

The authors wrote that religious belief amongst the Maori

Speaker:

has shifted significantly.

Speaker:

And, um, actually this figure's okay.

Speaker:

The number of Maori identifying as having no religion in the census Between

Speaker:

2006 and 2018, increased from 36.

Speaker:

5 percent to 53.

Speaker:

5%.

Speaker:

So that was the increase in the number of Maori having no religion.

Speaker:

And Christianity affiliation for Maori fell from 46 to 29.

Speaker:

Now that's in a 12 year period.

Speaker:

Now, are the Maori simply rejecting Christianity?

Speaker:

Or are they rejecting all supernatural, all supernatural phenomena,

Speaker:

including traditional Maori beliefs?

Speaker:

And these academics argue, our research examined the

Speaker:

apparent rise of Maori atheism.

Speaker:

We found the colonial history of religion was a driving force for

Speaker:

Maori who identified as atheists.

Speaker:

So they found people were Rejecting Christianity because they saw it as

Speaker:

a colonial sort of cultural feature that wasn't suitable to the Maori.

Speaker:

Scott and Joe?

Speaker:

I've often been bemused by our Indigenous brothers and sisters.

Speaker:

Attachment to Christianity and not, and not saying that as a

Speaker:

dilution of indigenous culture here.

Speaker:

Was it not a Native American who said, when the first white men came, they

Speaker:

had the Bibles and we had the land?

Speaker:

We closed our eyes to pray, and when we opened them again, we had

Speaker:

the Bibles and they had the land.

Speaker:

That's a good line.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Here's another one from the same research.

Speaker:

We also found Maori atheists said they experienced discrimination for their

Speaker:

lack of religion and their Maori ness was questioned within their community or work.

Speaker:

Black people in America have said the same thing.

Speaker:

About Native Americans?

Speaker:

No, no, no.

Speaker:

Black people.

Speaker:

So, African Americans.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Have said that effectively, Christianity is part of the

Speaker:

identity of being black in America.

Speaker:

And if you are an atheist, your very identity is being

Speaker:

questioned by your community.

Speaker:

So, it finishes off here, our research highlights the diversity of non

Speaker:

religion amongst Maori, which is neither reflected in representation

Speaker:

for Maori, nor considered in Maori Crown relations, and it's complex.

Speaker:

Anyway, link in the show notes, relevant sections, but yeah I wonder if that sort

Speaker:

of discussion will find its way into, uh, Australian Indigenous arguments

Speaker:

about whether Australian Indigenous people will drop Christianity, seeing

Speaker:

it as a sort of a colonial and cultural imposition, and whether being non

Speaker:

spiritual Will call into question your legitimate aspiration of being Indigenous.

Speaker:

See if those arguments make their way across the Tasman.

Speaker:

Certainly, certainly in the RI figures for Queensland.

Speaker:

Unadmittedly, I've not seen them for several years.

Speaker:

But the number of native beliefs or whatever the class is called, um, was

Speaker:

considerably lower than the Christian.

Speaker:

And I, I wonder how many Aboriginals still hold to traditional beliefs, as

Speaker:

opposed to some form of Christianity blended, possibly, with the surviving I

Speaker:

predict there, if you really questioned, there would be a surprisingly high

Speaker:

number of people who have a confusing mix of traditional spiritual, um, belief.

Speaker:

With Christian belief in some, in some, I mean, the Holy Trinity is inexplicable

Speaker:

in itself, but adding Yes traditional spiritual beliefs into that mix would be

Speaker:

something else again, and I think there would be a number of, a high number of

Speaker:

people who somehow would adhere to both in some complex mix that sounds impossible.

Speaker:

But when forced, say, uh, with one period of religious instruction

Speaker:

at school to choose between them, which one would they choose?

Speaker:

Yeah, well, whoever offers the best lollies and the most entertainment.

Speaker:

Well, possibly, yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Right, well, that's enough, I think.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

Trip around the world, New Zealand, will that transfer to Australia?

Speaker:

We'll find out in the Next year.

Speaker:

This is going to be the last episode for this year.

Speaker:

Take a bit of a break, come back in the new year, unless

Speaker:

something extraordinary happens.

Speaker:

Any other thoughts, gentlemen?

Speaker:

Any other closing comments you'd like to make, or just see you later?

Speaker:

You know, not in a Christian terms, but Merry Christmas to all our listeners, and,

Speaker:

Nadori Claren to you, my love, Sharon.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

Happy holidays.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Indeed, or even happy holiday, which is the Pastafarian greeting.

Speaker:

Oh, is it?

Speaker:

Yeah, I know that.

Speaker:

Singular.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

Singular, yes.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Alright.

Speaker:

Well, we're done for this episode.

Speaker:

We're done for the year.

Speaker:

Keep an eye you should be following us on Facebook because you'll get

Speaker:

notifications when our episode's coming out, so keep an eye on that to find

Speaker:

out when the next one's going to be.

Speaker:

It'll be a Tuesday night sometime in the new year.

Speaker:

Talk to you then.

Speaker:

Bye for now.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's a good night from me.

Speaker:

And it's a good night from him.

Speaker:

Good night.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube