Artwork for podcast Podmastery: podcasting insights and advice for indie creators
Podcasters, should we all boycott Spotify?
Episode 9010th August 2026 • Podmastery: podcasting insights and advice for indie creators • The Podmaster (Neal Veglio)
00:00:00 00:14:52

Share Episode

Shownotes

Last week I suggested, in a LinkedIn comment, that podcasters should all walk off Spotify together and keep them honest. Then I went and looked into how you'd actually do it. And that's when the truth of the situation emerged. And OMFG is it a situation. So this episode was going to be the good news about organising a walkout. Instead it's the honest version of why we can't.

In this episode:

— Where's the button to leave Spotify — One tap to skip you, a support ticket to go — The free rider problem, and why strikes need strike funds — Why the trade bodies can't help with this one — What happened when Neil Young actually tried it — My own conflict of interest, stated plainly — The one call to action worth changing this week

Podmastery goodies you can grab:

Transcripts

Speaker:

At the end of last week, I published an opinion piece about the pesky

Speaker:

new skip button in Spotify.

Speaker:

And when I was talking about it on LinkedIn, I mentioned

Speaker:

the idea of an industry-wide boycott to keep them in check.

Speaker:

And then I started thinking more deeply about that idea

Speaker:

and whether it's even possible.

Speaker:

Turns out it might not be.

Speaker:

And after recording it, I started investigating how I'd

Speaker:

pull my own show from Spotify.

Speaker:

And because I'd never considered it before, I hadn't realized

Speaker:

how difficult it is to do so.

Speaker:

I mean, sure, you can launch a podcast and choose not to have it in

Speaker:

Spotify in the first place, and the podcast hosting platform Buzzsprout's

Speaker:

own podcast did indeed make that decision until quite recently.

Speaker:

But if you wanna take your own show down from Spotify because they're

Speaker:

just not aligned with you, 'cause they do bad things like, I don't know,

Speaker:

trying to destroy their creators' very livelihoods by encouraging

Speaker:

people not to hear their content.

Speaker:

Well, if that's the case, you're out of luck.

Speaker:

Turns out that the only way to take your podcast off Spotify is to write

Speaker:

to Spotify and ask them really nicely to take your podcast off Spotify.

Speaker:

There's no button, which is quite something from a company that's just

Speaker:

built a very large button indeed

Speaker:

This is Podmastery Podcasting Insights, the podcast for people who've seen that

Speaker:

terrible Steven Bartlett ad on Instagram where he's claiming he can teach you

Speaker:

how to have a top-rated podcast and decided for themselves they'd rather

Speaker:

glug a whole bottle of Huel than spend even another second listening to

Speaker:

any advice from an overrated dragon.

Speaker:

I'm Neal Veglio, the podmaster.

Speaker:

Let's get you a step closer to podmastery

Speaker:

When everyone started offering their thoughts on Spotify testing

Speaker:

out this stupid skip ads button, I had a very visceral reaction to it.

Speaker:

And much like the idea that I'm sure every musical artist has had over the years,

Speaker:

even the ones that could afford to make it, My idea was, well, why don't we all

Speaker:

just leave as a podcasting collective?

Speaker:

Then I did some investigating.

Speaker:

See, last week when I published that idea on a comment in LinkedIn, I

Speaker:

thought that was where we could start shaping the direction for podcasters.

Speaker:

And this episode was gonna be all about the good news around that idea.

Speaker:

But now it can't be.

Speaker:

The theory of podcasting is that RSS makes you free.

Speaker:

There's no contract with Spotify, no exclusivity deals, no notice period.

Speaker:

You never signed anything apart from accepting the terms and conditions

Speaker:

of being published on their platform, which is a button click away.

Speaker:

There we are with the buttons again.

Speaker:

All of that is true, but what it doesn't give you is an exit.

Speaker:

If your show is externally hosted, the procedure for your exit is this:

Speaker:

contact support, send your feed and link, and then wait with no published

Speaker:

timeframe in mind If you're Spotify hosted, you can't remove the show at

Speaker:

all without deleting your whole account.

Speaker:

Their own suggested workaround involves publishing a placeholder

Speaker:

episode and then just deleting the rest of your back catalog around

Speaker:

it, which is not a workaround.

Speaker:

That's a hostage situation with a help article and terms and conditions.

Speaker:

So let's get the shape of this completely straight.

Speaker:

Spotify have built a one-tap button so your listener can skip past the bits

Speaker:

where you ask for financial support

Speaker:

and a support ticket queue for you to leave when they do that.

Speaker:

One tap to skip you and an email and an unspecified wait time to go.

Speaker:

It's funny where they chose to remove the friction, isn't it?

Speaker:

Right now, friction is the only reason that ad reads survive at all.

Speaker:

The only thing making people listen to ad reads is the pain point of them

Speaker:

having to bother clicking to skip them

Speaker:

And if they're doing something else like, I don't know, washing up or

Speaker:

driving, that's an even harder task.

Speaker:

So this button removes that friction entirely.

Speaker:

And from what little has been said about this, It sounds like that

Speaker:

button can be trained to remove that friction almost automatically.

Speaker:

It was an easy fix for them to destroy creators in favor of what?

Speaker:

I don't know.

Speaker:

Money?

Speaker:

Encouraging premium subscriptions to utilize this kind of a button And this

Speaker:

friction to leaving their platform is the same but in the opposite direction.

Speaker:

And whoever controls where the friction sits controls the outcome.

Speaker:

And we all know that most creators won't want to suffer FOMO of no longer being

Speaker:

available on their platform, particularly if there's no easy way to do it or a

Speaker:

timeframe to measure the result of trying.

Speaker:

So here's why a boycott fails.

Speaker:

First of all, you've got the free rider problem.

Speaker:

The benefit goes to every podcaster alive, including the ones who stayed.

Speaker:

The cost is borne only by those who decided to leave.

Speaker:

the rational move for any d- individual is to let everyone else

Speaker:

do it, and that's not cynicism.

Speaker:

It's what collective action does without enforcement.

Speaker:

It's why strikes need strike funds and people calling out, "Scab!" them

Speaker:

not to stay There's the asymmetric pain and the dominance trap.

Speaker:

Like the indie with 200 downloads loses maybe a third to half of their audience.

Speaker:

Spotify, well, all they're losing is one show out of roughly five million, and

Speaker:

the shows big enough to hurt them have got Spotify money, Spotify deals, and

Speaker:

ad revenue that a walkout would torch.

Speaker:

So they can't really do that, can they?

Speaker:

And the exit runs through their help desk, not particularly publicly.

Speaker:

A boycott only works as an event, so a thousand shows leaving on the

Speaker:

same Tuesday becomes a news story.

Speaker:

A thousand shows individually raising support tickets and waiting an unspecified

Speaker:

number of days for any human at Spotify to get round to it, that's not an event.

Speaker:

It's a temporary tech support challenge that only has to exist until they

Speaker:

update their marketing to discourage it with yet more propaganda or a bribe

Speaker:

And no press means no pressure, and no pressure usually means nothing changes.

Speaker:

So the mechanism defeats itself before anyone's even organized anything

Speaker:

Let's counter the argument that nobody could make this stick because there

Speaker:

are lots of trade bodies that could technically facilitate a movement.

Speaker:

You got Audio UK, which is a trade association for professional

Speaker:

audio production companies.

Speaker:

You got Podcasters United.

Speaker:

That's a thing that exists.

Speaker:

WGA East has genuinely unionized audio shops, but that's employees

Speaker:

organizing against an employer, a completely different mechanism

Speaker:

from independent business owners coordinating against a distributor.

Speaker:

And then you've got The Podcast Academy, which seems very good at

Speaker:

giving out awards and not much else

Speaker:

What none of these bodies has is the one thing that a union needs,

Speaker:

the power to make members act together and then bear a cost.

Speaker:

No strike fund, no binding vote, no mechanism.

Speaker:

Advocacy and networking are both genuinely useful, but not with this

Speaker:

And here's the aligned precedent that I think some people are thinking about

Speaker:

that is kind of relevant to this.

Speaker:

In January 2022, Neil Young, the musician, pulled his entire catalog

Speaker:

from Spotify over concerns with the content that top podcaster Joe Rogan

Speaker:

was putting out there on the platform.

Speaker:

And then Joni Mitchell followed, Nils Lofgren, India Arie.

Speaker:

All global press this with household names and real cultural weight.

Speaker:

But then just two years later, in March 2024, all were back

Speaker:

and Joe Rogan is still there.

Speaker:

So nothing actually changed.

Speaker:

So my point to you is that if Neil Young can't move them, a coalition

Speaker:

of indie podcasters with a shared Google Doc and lots of signatures

Speaker:

probably isn't going to either.

Speaker:

Let's talk about my personal dilemma because, you know, let's be honest

Speaker:

about this, everyone's got skin in the game, and I fully realize that

Speaker:

even bringing this up puts me in a slightly uncomfortable position.

Speaker:

Namely, that in order to advocate for a boycott, I'd probably have to lead it.

Speaker:

I'd have to participate, and that's an expensive principle to maintain.

Speaker:

So our network at Podnos, the Indie Creators Network, ICN, I could

Speaker:

technically get buy-in from the member podcasts to join in pulling

Speaker:

out eventually, and then I've gotta wait for Spotify to action the email

Speaker:

whenever they decide to get round to it.

Speaker:

But the Podnos client shows on my top-tier packages, they're not mine to

Speaker:

pull, and they belong to clients who quite reasonably refuse to lose half

Speaker:

their audience for a principle that their podcasting agency talked them into.

Speaker:

So within a week, I'd be the bloke who called for a walkout and then

Speaker:

didn't walk, and that's exactly the kind of BS move that this show exists

Speaker:

to literally take the piss out of.

Speaker:

Selling the feeling of action instead of the action.

Speaker:

Yeah, we're not gonna become that.

Speaker:

Sorry

Speaker:

So here's the fundamental problem here.

Speaker:

RSS gives you freedom to publish.

Speaker:

Nobody can stop you making the show.

Speaker:

Nobody can refuse you a feed.

Speaker:

No gatekeeper decides whether you're allowed to exist

Speaker:

But what it does not give you is control over where you end up.

Speaker:

Open distribution means anybody can pick your feed up, including

Speaker:

people you probably rather didn't, and getting them to put it down

Speaker:

again is a request, not a right.

Speaker:

So that's the actual trade in play here: freedom to publish, no control over

Speaker:

distribution, and they're not two separate problems you can fix one at a time.

Speaker:

They're the same thing viewed from either end

Speaker:

So here's the question.

Speaker:

If someone offered you the swap, i.e., a body with real collective

Speaker:

power, but you got that in exchange for needing permission to publish,

Speaker:

you probably wouldn't take it, right?

Speaker:

Nobody would.

Speaker:

We chose this, and mostly we chose right.

Speaker:

podcasters should unite against the behemoth of Spotify

Speaker:

is a lovely LinkedIn post.

Speaker:

It's also, if you follow it all the way down, a request to be governed

Speaker:

So where then is our leverage?

Speaker:

Well, here's the deal.

Speaker:

It's not with me and it's not with you.

Speaker:

The injured party in all of this at the moment is the advertiser who paid

Speaker:

for something they didn't get, and the networks like Acast, Audacy, The

Speaker:

New York Times, whose sold inventory is being suppressed by a competitor.

Speaker:

So now we've got contracts, money, lawyers involved.

Speaker:

All podcasters have is a gripe and social media posts

Speaker:

Oh, and let's not forget the hero in this story, the press,

Speaker:

namely James Cridland at Podnews.

Speaker:

Now, James did more damage to Spotify in one week of his reporting

Speaker:

than any boycott would have.

Speaker:

That's the reality of this here.

Speaker:

20 people posting on LinkedIn that they are gonna pull their shows from Spotify

Speaker:

with nothing more than a supportive like on the post is definitely not

Speaker:

gonna compete with tens of thousands of people reading James informing them

Speaker:

of how bad the platform's behaving

Speaker:

So here's the truth in all this.

Speaker:

The fight is very real, it just isn't ours to win, and pretending

Speaker:

otherwise wastes the energy we could be spending on the things that are

Speaker:

If collective leverage isn't available, individual leverage is all there is,

Speaker:

and you have exactly one asset no platform can skip, reorder, throttle,

Speaker:

or algorithm away from existence, and we'll talk more about that in a moment

Speaker:

and in a moment, I'll play you a trailer from one of our Podmastery community

Speaker:

members, which is incidentally exactly the sort of thing that no algorithm is

Speaker:

ever gonna recommend to you, which is kind of the point of having a community.

Speaker:

Join the waitlist now, podmastery.co/waitlist

Speaker:

Okay, so because I like to leave loose ends tied

Speaker:

On your next episode, here is something you can think about doing to combat this.

Speaker:

Change one call to action from your next episode from a

Speaker:

platform action to a direct one.

Speaker:

So not follow the show wherever you're listening to this, not leave

Speaker:

us a rating or review, and not check us out on YouTube, which is very

Speaker:

tempting at the moment because everyone else is trying to grow on YouTube.

Speaker:

But all three of these are numbers that Spotify, Apple, and Google own

Speaker:

and can devalue, re-weight, or take away from you whenever they fancy.

Speaker:

You're asking your listener for a favor in somebody else's currency.

Speaker:

Swap that out for something that comes back to you.

Speaker:

Maybe a reply, an email address, a name on a list Nobody has ever built a skip

Speaker:

button for an email I hope you found this episode informative and inspirational.

Speaker:

If you did, please do make sure that you get signed up to the community

Speaker:

waitlist, podmastery.co/waitlist.

Speaker:

I'm Neal Veglio.

Speaker:

Go make your next episode with the right call to action that

Speaker:

hopefully will bring you luck in your continuing journey towards pod mastery

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube