Long-range hunting is one of those topics that can start an argument in a hurry. For some hunters, taking an animal at 500, 600, or even 700 yards completely defeats the purpose of hunting. For others, it’s simply another skill—one that takes a tremendous amount of practice, preparation, and discipline to do responsibly.

But where exactly do we draw the line?

Because this conversation isn’t limited to rifles anymore. Modern muzzleloaders are capable of distances we would’ve never dreamed of a few decades ago. Archery equipment keeps getting faster and more capable, and technology like rangefinders, ballistic calculators, custom turrets, and increasingly accurate rifles has continued to stretch the distances hunters are comfortable shooting.

The equipment might be capable—but is the hunter?

This week, we’re talking about long-range hunting and asking a pretty simple question with a not-so-simple answer: How far is too far?

We get into the ethics of taking long shots at game, the difference between being able to hit a target and being able to reliably kill an animal, how much practice it actually takes to become proficient at distance, and why your maximum effective range probably shouldn’t be determined by what somebody else can do.

Whether you think long-range hunting is an impressive display of marksmanship or believe hunters ought to spend more time getting closer, there’s a lot more nuance to this conversation than simply picking a number and calling everything beyond it unethical.

Deep Roots Rifles USE CODE UPO10 FOR 10% OFF

Under Pressure Outdoors

underpressureoutdoors Official: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook | Linktree

Under Pressure Outdoors Podcast | By Hunters For Hunters | Patreon