Artwork for podcast Adjusted for Risk
Independent vs. Consolidators: Defining Wealth Management's Future
8th April 2026 • Adjusted for Risk • Ryan Nauman
00:00:00 00:40:13

Share Episode

Shownotes

In this episode of Zephyr’s Adjusted for Risk, Ryan Nauman speaks with Pete McGratty, Executive Director of RIA Development at Verdence, about the evolution of wealth management and the shifting landscape of the independent channel. Pete outlines three phases of change, from early broker-driven models to the breakaway movement and today’s emerging split between traditional independent RIAs and large PE-backed consolidators. They discuss how scale is expanding service menus (technology, planning, tax, private investments) while differing values can recreate “wirehouse” behaviors inside independence. Pete frames a “four-legged stool” for evaluating firms—fiduciary alignment, proactive client relationships, planning, and investments—and explains how smaller firms can compete by leveraging community resources, succession solutions, and shared capabilities. The conversation also dives into private markets, especially private credit, emphasizing client fit, education, due diligence, and the risks of interval fund liquidity mismatches.

Learn more about Zephyr here.

Learn more about Verdence here.

00:00 Welcome and Sponsor

01:02 Meet Pete McGratty

03:07 Wealth Management Evolution

05:55 Third Wave of Independence

10:42 Consolidators vs RIAs

16:35 Ecosystem Choosing Sides

19:47 How Small RIAs Compete

23:17 Private Markets Opportunity

27:46 Interval Funds and Risks

33:23 Due Diligence Solutions

38:39 Wrap Up and Resources

Connect with Ryan Nauman: LinkedIn

Transcripts

Speaker:

Let's go.

2

:

Ryan Nauman Market Strategist Zephyr:

Hello everyone and welcome to

3

:

zephyr's adjusted for Risk podcast.

4

:

I am Ryan Nauman, the market

strategist here at Zephyr.

5

:

One of the hottest trends in the

wealth management space has been the

6

:

question whether to go independent

or remain as a captive advisor.

7

:

Well, I have on the perfect

guest to share his great.

8

:

Insights about the evolution of the

wealth management space and the current

9

:

landscape of the independent channel.

10

:

But first, today's episode is sponsored

by the award-winning Zephyr, which

11

:

helps investment professionals

make more informed investment

12

:

decisions on behalf of their clients.

13

:

Alright, enough from me.

14

:

Let's go ahead and move on

to the star of the show.

15

:

I would like to welcome Pete McGrady.

16

:

Pete is the executive director

of RIA Development at Verdant.

17

:

Pete, thank you so much

for coming on the podcast.

18

:

It's really an honor to have you and

we had a great conversation last week.

19

:

Really looking forward to this one.

20

:

It's gonna be a good one.

21

:

Can you please tell us a little bit

more about yourself and verdant?

22

:

Peter McGratty Executive Director RIA Development Verdence:

Sure.

23

:

Thank you very much for having me.

24

:

I'm honored to be part of your program.

25

:

a little background about me.

26

:

I spent the first half of my

career on the institutional money

27

:

management side of the equation.

28

:

I spent a portion of it as a sell side

research analyst and was fortunate to

29

:

be awarded wall Street Journal, Allstar

bank Analyst while I was doing that.

30

:

And then subsequently I was on

the buy side managing money.

31

:

But about 15, 16 years ago, I pivoted

to the Wealth Management Channel and

32

:

in the wealth management channel.

33

:

What I've really been doing is working

with independent across the country

34

:

working with them typically on items

like continuity and succession planning.

35

:

Helping firms break away from

existing or from wirehouse or broker

36

:

dealer firms to create their own

independent RIA but primarily working

37

:

with existing independent RIAs.

38

:

To help 'em free up their time and

to help 'em be more competitive with

39

:

the firms that they're out there

competing with, how do we do that?

40

:

We can provide them a lot of support

around public and private investments.

41

:

We can provide them support

around financial planning, around

42

:

operations, around compliance.

43

:

But again, the whole idea is to free

up their time and provide them the

44

:

tools so they can be competitive.

45

:

Ryan: Yeah, that's fantastic.

46

:

And as we know, financial advisors,

especially on the independent side, they

47

:

have to wear many different hats and man.

48

:

Manage a lot of different

roles of their practice.

49

:

So helping them so they can do

probably what's most important.

50

:

And that's the relationship management

practice part of it is most important.

51

:

So Pete, let's start just by talking

about the evolution in this space.

52

:

I'm gonna age myself.

53

:

20 years ago when I started, it was.

54

:

It was more brokers, right?

55

:

There wasn't financial planning.

56

:

It wasn't you know, it was all

commission based for the most part.

57

:

Can you just add a little bit more

color to the evolution over the

58

:

years of the wealth management space?

59

:

Peter McGratty: Yeah so as I mentioned,

I've been a part of the wealth

60

:

management space for about 15, 16 years.

61

:

I really pivoted from the

money management world

62

:

into the wealth management

world around:

63

:

so I can speak.

64

:

To my experience since then.

65

:

And I really see three, evolutions,

and you'll have to forgive me since

66

:

I haven't been around for 30 years.

67

:

But my understanding is, you know

that the independent channel really.

68

:

Started probably when I

started my career back in:

69

:

Maybe earlier than that, the industry

was really dominated by the FINRA world

70

:

the wirehouse and broker dealer world.

71

:

And then you saw the CFP program emerging

and you started to see independent I

72

:

can't speak a lot to that 'cause a lot

of that was before my time, but I do

73

:

remember those independent firms starting

to, and that whole independent channel

74

:

starting to form as an alternative.

75

:

when I pivoted from the institutional

money management world, in back

76

:

around 2010 that really had

started, the independent channel

77

:

was really more fully formed.

78

:

And I think we were moving into the

second evolution of the of the channel.

79

:

And that was the breakaway movement where.

80

:

a sufficient the independent channel

had become sufficiently established.

81

:

and there was a growing ecosystem

of firms that were there to support

82

:

independent and then I think

following a series of high profile.

83

:

Mistakes by the wirehouses or

conflicts by the wirehouses.

84

:

One that stands out in my mind was

the auction rate preferred securities.

85

:

That they thrust down their client's

throats and then they blew up.

86

:

I think you saw greater and greater

interest upon by the wirehouse advisors

87

:

to start to consider the independent

channel as an option, and you really saw

88

:

that accelerate between 2010 and 2020.

89

:

And now I think and now I think the reason

you and I are talking and we can talk

90

:

about this some more when the time comes,

I think we're on the precipice of a, of

91

:

a third evolution, and that evolution is

gonna redefine the independent channel.

92

:

Ryan: Yeah, we are definitely,

let's, yeah, let's go there.

93

:

Pete, I think that's a perfect

segue and, and the evolution

94

:

of the space is, is spot on.

95

:

I think you what, let's talk about the

independent space is it's one of the

96

:

hottest topics now, going independent,

as you mentioned, what isn't being

97

:

talked about in the independent

space, everyone talks about just.

98

:

You go independent or not?

99

:

A lot of talk about m and a activity

right now, but is there an aspect to

100

:

going independent or being independent

that maybe he's not talked enough about

101

:

that , is kind of behind the scenes?

102

:

Peter McGratty: Yeah.

103

:

I really think it's this idea that we're

on the precipice of another evolution

104

:

of the channel and what I mean by

that is, You know, if you go back to

105

:

2010 and 2010 to 2020, what you found

is a lot of these advisors had gone

106

:

independent and they really liked it.

107

:

For the first time, they had the

freedom to do what they wanted to do.

108

:

They had the freedom to do the

things that they saw were necessary

109

:

to take care of their clients.

110

:

I think they liked.

111

:

The idea of a fiduciary duty where they

can do well by doing right by their

112

:

client and being fully aligned with them.

113

:

And it was also a fantastic sort of a

marketing differentiator versus the world

114

:

that they'd come from in the wirehouses.

115

:

And so most of them were.

116

:

Very happy and saw a long

future ahead of them.

117

:

And I would describe them as all

wanting to die with their boots on.

118

:

And so during that that period from 2010

to:

119

:

become more interested in this business

model and consolidating the independent.

120

:

wealth managers, there wasn't as much

interest on the part of the advisors.

121

:

They were happy with the new world

that they'd found and created and

122

:

weren't really looking to exit.

123

:

but of course, as we all know, the

average age of an advisor today is 58 or

124

:

60, depending on the survey you look at.

125

:

so as the decade progressed,

there were more and more

126

:

folks approaching retirement.

127

:

And some of the multiples that were

being offered by these consolidators

128

:

became more and more attractive.

129

:

And so over the decade, some of

these consolidators went from being

130

:

smaller, relatively smaller to some

of them have become quite large.

131

:

And now that they have become quite large.

132

:

There's sort of two dynamics

that folks have been dancing

133

:

around for the last few years.

134

:

that is one that these firms, as they've

gotten larger, they have the scale.

135

:

To invest in resources and expand

their menu of solutions to clients

136

:

that some of the smaller independent

firms just don't have the scale and

137

:

don't have some of those resources.

138

:

So that's one delta.

139

:

And then the second, I think

more important one is the

140

:

rec growing recognition.

141

:

That the two types of firms, the

independent and the consolidator, have

142

:

different agendas, they have different

goals, they have different values.

143

:

what do I mean by that?

144

:

The the consolidators are

really driven, a much more

145

:

institutional p and l type model.

146

:

They're looking to grow profits.

147

:

They're looking to grow they're

looking to grow revenues.

148

:

They're looking to grow profits.

149

:

They're looking to grow the firm with

the idea of ultimately, selling out to

150

:

another private equity firm or going

public at some point down the road.

151

:

So they have a very, they're very

focused on running a business.

152

:

I think that the traditional

independent wealth management firm,

153

:

of course they're also running

a business, but their priorities

154

:

their values are very different.

155

:

on.

156

:

First on on the client, and really

try and have a relationship with the

157

:

client and taking care of that client.

158

:

And for most of these folks, those

clients over time become almost friend.

159

:

Not only friends, but almost family.

160

:

and secondly, they've

remained very focused on.

161

:

On planning and providing a very

strong planning and investment

162

:

solution for their clients.

163

:

And so their values are very different.

164

:

One is very much to grow and

get bigger and to monetize

165

:

the success of that growth.

166

:

And the other is really still focused

on client first, planning first.

167

:

So to tie it back to your question,

this next evolution, we've now

168

:

reached a point where the large firms.

169

:

a competitive advantage

because of their scale.

170

:

And that's starting to create

differences that folks need to address.

171

:

And secondly, recognition that

there's two very different value sets.

172

:

And so the question is how does,

how do we how does the independent

173

:

channel respond to those differences?

174

:

Ryan: Well, let's talk

about those differences.

175

:

PE.

176

:

Mentioned the different value sets,

which I think make a lot of sense.

177

:

And exactly what you said, the independent

side, they're more about, the planning,

178

:

their clients become family, whereas

more of the consolidators they, are

179

:

looking to grow and, to increase their

multiples, so there's different values.

180

:

How do you really distinguish the two

the consolidators from the independence?

181

:

Peter McGratty: So in terms of,

like I said, there's two sort of two

182

:

ways that I think about the issue.

183

:

One is scale.

184

:

So clearly the consolidators these

days have become very large and they

185

:

have more resources which means they

can invest in technology to facilitate

186

:

operations and administration.

187

:

can also invest in resources like having.

188

:

Multiple investment options on the

menu which could range from passive

189

:

to passive plus to active strategies

could range from portfolios that

190

:

own ETFs or mutual funds or SMAs.

191

:

And then more recently it might also mean.

192

:

Making private investments

available to clients.

193

:

On the planning side, it also

may mean, you know, you can do

194

:

some more sophisticated planning.

195

:

In some cases family office type services.

196

:

you're starting to see firms

offer tax services, so the menus

197

:

are expanding so that's one big.

198

:

Differentiator and that has to

be addressed as we go forward.

199

:

But the values question, I think is

the more interesting one that you ask.

200

:

And how do I think about values?

201

:

I really think of, a wealth management

firm as being a four-legged stool.

202

:

The first leg is around the

fiduciary responsibility that you

203

:

are really going to do what's in

the best interest of your client.

204

:

Not only, because you have to from a

regulatory standpoint, because that's

205

:

what you believe is the right thing to do.

206

:

So no conflicts of interest, transparency,

do what's best for the client.

207

:

That's leg number one.

208

:

leg number two, is to have a proactive

relationship with your clients,

209

:

which means I'm a client first type.

210

:

I'm doing what's in their best interest.

211

:

I have limited the number of folks

that I am working with so that I

212

:

can have a proactive relationship.

213

:

I can know who you are.

214

:

As oppo I can know who you are.

215

:

The third leg is the planning focus and

the fourth leg is an investment focus.

216

:

And in those two, those are

planning and investments obviously.

217

:

You can do, you know, planning

or investment light, or you can

218

:

do planning and investment strong

or heavy, to do a good job.

219

:

And I think that's the best way to

evaluate it because what you find

220

:

is the traditional firms, continue

to be fiduciary, transparent,

221

:

no conflicts of interest.

222

:

some of the larger firms are

starting to offer products that are

223

:

paid for as a product, so there's

a conflict of interest there.

224

:

A good example is they might sell

insurance, separate from the management

225

:

fee on the second leg in terms of

the number of clients that you have.

226

:

I think Michael Kitsis has done a lot

of really good research on how many

227

:

clients you should have, and history

suggests that, any individual can

228

:

really, can only really know about a

hundred to 125 or 150 clients before

229

:

you start to forget who they are.

230

:

And I've seen some of these larger firms.

231

:

Stacking numbers much higher

than that on their advisors.

232

:

On the third one, in terms of planning,

there are clearly firms that are very

233

:

planning heavy where the advisors or

a team that is supporting the advisor

234

:

believes in doing very comprehensive.

235

:

Planning and doing updating that

planning over the client's lifecycle.

236

:

also seen some of these larger

consolidators use it as a loss

237

:

leader and doing planning light

upfront to help win the business

238

:

and bring the assets on board.

239

:

And then the fourth one under investments.

240

:

Having been a former money manager myself.

241

:

There are only so many best portfolios

that you can put your client in.

242

:

I've seen larger firms, the

consolidators offering, even bragging

243

:

about 10,000 models, and they're

just not 10,000 best portfolios.

244

:

That reeks to me of I'll give

you whatever you want, Mr.

245

:

Client, as long as you bring

your assets over to us.

246

:

So what I'm saying around the values is.

247

:

A lot of the independent RIAs are sticking

to their knitting and trying to stay true

248

:

to those four, four legs to the stool.

249

:

The concern amongst the independent, the

more traditional independent RIAs, and

250

:

a concern that I increasingly have is

that some of these larger consolidators,

251

:

not all of 'em, I don't wanna blanket

everybody but we're seeing more and more.

252

:

Some of these folks are simply

recreating the old the old wirehouse

253

:

model within the independent channel.

254

:

And that that only we believe is not in

the best interest of the client, but it

255

:

also makes it, more difficult for, the

independent RIAs because they look the

256

:

same, but they're not, in fact the same.

257

:

Ryan: Yeah, Pete, I'm really glad

because as you were describing that,

258

:

kind of talking about the consolidators,

I was just, I was like, aren't we?

259

:

Is this maybe like wirehouse

part two or two point?

260

:

Know or wirehouse light, it kind of seemed

like those consolidators are starting

261

:

to take the model of the wirehouse.

262

:

Peter McGratty: Yeah.

263

:

And that's why I said earlier that

we've been, I think that the independent

264

:

channel or the folks in the independent

channel have been dancing around this

265

:

issue for the last few years because.

266

:

I think people have been starting to

sense that this change is going on

267

:

and that, yes, just like you said,

that they are starting to recreate

268

:

the old model in new clothes.

269

:

But I think in the last six

months or so, it's increasingly

270

:

becoming clear that this split.

271

:

Is no longer something we think might be

happening, but we know it is happening.

272

:

And I think there's a growing sense that

we know it's happening and we need to

273

:

start to circle the wagons and figure

out how we're gonna deal with this issue.

274

:

what do I mean by that?

275

:

One of the things that's starting,

you know, so before it was, oh, how

276

:

are we gonna distinguish our brand?

277

:

Because they're actually different.

278

:

it's more than that now

it's becoming very material.

279

:

Where even the Echo, the folks in

the ecosystem that have been there

280

:

all along to support the independent

RIA are starting to choose sides.

281

:

So I hear stories of firms who are

saying, you know, it's much easier to

282

:

work with one large consolidator who's

gonna continually send business to me

283

:

than go Chase 50 independent RIAs who

are only periodically gonna have business

284

:

that in a number of places.

285

:

I've seen it specifically

with the custodians.

286

:

Obviously they like more

assets with fewer clients.

287

:

That's good for their business

288

:

and I was at a large custodian's or

wealth management conference and of

289

:

last year, and they basically came

right out and said in their keynote

290

:

that we are gonna support these large

consolidator firms and that the smaller.

291

:

Independent firms have to figure out how

they're gonna be able to compete with

292

:

the scale of these large consolidators.

293

:

And then I've also heard of

recruiting firms who are reorienting

294

:

towards, I'll do lots of recruiting.

295

:

Jobs for one large firm, rather

than focus on chasing marketing to

296

:

and chasing lots of smaller firms.

297

:

And so now you're starting to see

not only do we think there may be a

298

:

change, a difference in values that

we need to distinguish ourselves from.

299

:

But we also are now seeing the

industry starting to choose sides,

300

:

and that also puts pressure on the

smaller firms to find a solution,

301

:

which brings us to where we are today.

302

:

I think that, I think the

stakes are on the table.

303

:

People understand what's

happening and they're starting

304

:

to talk about it out loud.

305

:

And I'm seeing lots of,

a lot more conversations.

306

:

And a lot more action starting to

emerge on how the more traditional

307

:

independent can leverage that community,

the resources within that community

308

:

to find solutions to a, make sure

that they can brand and differentiate

309

:

themselves from the large consolidators.

310

:

And second, and equally important is

borrow one another's resources or scale

311

:

so they can offer the same kind of.

312

:

longer menu that the larger firms can do.

313

:

Ryan: Yeah, Pete, I completely agree.

314

:

Great stuff there.

315

:

What, so then how can smaller truth.

316

:

Independent firms compete in this

new environment where, like you're

317

:

talking about larger consolidators,

they have scale, they have access

318

:

to more like resources and so on.

319

:

How can the smaller firms

compete against that?

320

:

Peter McGratty: So like we're

having I'm a member of nafa,

321

:

Ryan: Okay.

322

:

Peter McGratty: which as works

with the sort of the more

323

:

traditional independent RIA.

324

:

This is a big topic of

conversation within our community.

325

:

And really what we're, so

what we're starting to focus

326

:

on is how can we leverage.

327

:

The folks in our community who

still believe in first client

328

:

first and second financial planning

is important and we wanna do

329

:

comprehensive and ongoing planning.

330

:

how can we find, let's identify the

resources, of the folks within our

331

:

own community and see how we can,

leverage one another within the

332

:

community to get those resources.

333

:

Use myself as a, as an example.

334

:

But I know there are others.

335

:

Vernon's Capital Advisors is a, is an

independent wealth management firm.

336

:

We are a NAFA member firm.

337

:

We're on the larger

side of that community.

338

:

We happen to have a lot of resources.

339

:

We have resources in financial planning.

340

:

We have resources.

341

:

Investment management, both on

the public and the private side.

342

:

We've got financial planning resources.

343

:

We've got operations compliance.

344

:

And through Burden's, RIA Plus, which is

a division I run at Vers we are now making

345

:

some of those resources available to

independents who wanna remain independent.

346

:

They still wanna run their own show,

they wanna have their own clients,

347

:

they wanna take care of those clients

the way they see fit, but they may not

348

:

have the scale, for example, to offer

five public investment strategies.

349

:

Ranging from private to active, or they

may not have the facility to do private

350

:

investments, which is increasingly

important for if you wanna chase larger

351

:

clients or family office clients, so that

there's an opportunity that they can find

352

:

enough that a NAP firm member can find.

353

:

firm that has the same values that are

still client first but has developed

354

:

some of these resources and is

willing to allow them to borrow them.

355

:

That would be one example.

356

:

Another big conversation we're having in

the community is developing a a continuity

357

:

and succession planning solution.

358

:

So again, rather than having

NAFA community members.

359

:

When they're ready to retire, sell

to one of these large consolidators

360

:

that don't have the same values

and may not be as good for.

361

:

clients or their employees, once they're

absorbed, can they identify other firms

362

:

within the community that might be a

better succession solution for them?

363

:

so I just give, I'm, you know,

I'm certainly not the only one.

364

:

There's a lot of firms

that have solutions.

365

:

But to make it concrete, what

the simple idea is are there f.

366

:

Are there firms within our community

that are still true to the values that

367

:

we think are important that we can

leverage one another in order to be

368

:

competitive with the larger firms and

not forfeit our what we believe to be

369

:

the right way to take care of the client?

370

:

Ryan: Yeah, Pete, that's fantastic.

371

:

You brought up private markets.

372

:

The, the hot topic in the space is

private markets on the investment

373

:

side, particularly private credit.

374

:

And I've had a lot of conversations

like whether you're a consolidator

375

:

small, independent advisor, but one

way to distinguish your practice

376

:

from your competitors is offering

private markets or, different types of

377

:

alternatives to investment portfolios.

378

:

ETFs Mutual.

379

:

They're table stakes.

380

:

You gotta do something else to help

create those investment portfolios?

381

:

Can you talk a little bit more about

the impact private markets are having

382

:

on the independent space and, and are

we there, are we trying to force, , a

383

:

square peg into a round hole right now?

384

:

Or is that merger or that

marriage gonna work out?

385

:

Peter McGratty: I would say there is

very definitely a role for privates.

386

:

In the wealth management

business for certain clients.

387

:

What do I mean by that?

388

:

We know today that clients are

interested in privates because they

389

:

hear about 'em on TV all the time.

390

:

and they're asking about them.

391

:

The reason they're asking about

them is because if you look at the

392

:

track record of private investments.

393

:

Over the last, I don't know, 10

or 15 years, there is evidence to

394

:

suggest that they generate better

returns with less volatility.

395

:

And therefore, by adding it to a

portfolio, you can improve the the return

396

:

and the diversification of the portfolio.

397

:

From a, an advisor standpoint, there's

clearly interest in it because.

398

:

It is differentiating.

399

:

Not everybody can offer it.

400

:

And it also because it improves

the out investment outcomes of the

401

:

clients that is also differentiating.

402

:

They also like it because honestly

the illiquidity of the the, of the

403

:

investment means that client is

gonna be one of your clients for.

404

:

If it's locked up for five or 10

years, there it helps with the

405

:

longevity of the client relationship.

406

:

But the real reason is because there

is an appropriate role for it in

407

:

some people's investment portfolios.

408

:

What does that mean by some

people's investment portfolios?

409

:

It means.

410

:

Typically larger clients qualified

purchasers north of 5 million in

411

:

investible assets or family office

type clients where they've got a

412

:

sufficient amount of assets, in their

portfolio that they can tolerate.

413

:

A portion of their investments

being longer term and less liquid

414

:

without impacting how they live

their lives in the shorter term.

415

:

so it's not for everybody but there

is good reason to offer it to some

416

:

clients, and there is good reason

for the advisors to want to offer

417

:

it to those particular clients.

418

:

The difficulty to your question becomes

how does an A wealth manager offer it?

419

:

And difficulty there is that most

advisors have been trained in

420

:

planning and in doing research and

due diligence for public investments.

421

:

and private investments are

very different in terms of.

422

:

How you do the due

diligence and selection.

423

:

They're very different in

how they're structured.

424

:

And there's a whole vocabulary

and knowledge base associated with

425

:

how these things are structured.

426

:

And the most important piece is that

there's, are clearly less liquid than

427

:

what people are accustomed to using.

428

:

and so so the first part of it is.

429

:

These advisors need a certain amount of

education so that they can understand it

430

:

and make good decisions and communicate

effectively with their clients.

431

:

And secondly.

432

:

going back to our previous

discussion, a scale issue.

433

:

You need to have the right people who have

experience, which means adding somebody

434

:

to staff that has experience doing this.

435

:

And you gonna need some technology to help

manage the administration because there's

436

:

a lot of paperwork associated with this.

437

:

And oftentimes that's too

much for the smaller firms.

438

:

To take on.

439

:

And so they really need a a third party

solution and borrow somebody else's scale.

440

:

so that's the addition.

441

:

That's that sort of covers why

it's difficult to offer it that

442

:

as a consequence of that, what

you've seen, and I'm gonna, I'm

443

:

gonna summarize a little bit here.

444

:

of that.

445

:

seen is that there's been a lot of

interest that, you know, the private

446

:

investments world, the private

markets world has identified that is,

447

:

there's a lot of assets that could be.

448

:

Invested in the Wealth Management Channel,

they've identified that there is interest.

449

:

There's a role for client private

investments in client portfolios.

450

:

They've identified that there's

interest from advisors themselves.

451

:

But the thing that has not been

tackled are these education and

452

:

due diligence and selection issues.

453

:

That the industry has not prepared to do.

454

:

And then once the private markets

providers, the funds realized that, that's

455

:

a, that's gonna be a difficult obstacle

to getting those dollars invested.

456

:

They started creating what the, what

they call interval funds, where they

457

:

put a long duration, illiquid private

investment in a semi-liquid wrapper

458

:

that looks and feels more like.

459

:

A public investment where there's a

daily NAV and there is some liquidity.

460

:

While it's not daily liquidity,

it's often quarterly liquidity,

461

:

and that liquidity is limited.

462

:

You know, you may only, well, maybe

only 5% of the fund can be liquidated.

463

:

And that creates, I think the difficulty

that you're alluding to and that we're

464

:

seeing in the news today is that it

feels like a liquid public investment.

465

:

when there's trouble and the

client wants to get out the,

466

:

they can't, the exits are closed.

467

:

And so they're all caught off guard.

468

:

I thought this was just like the rest

of my public investments and it's not.

469

:

and that can create some difficulty.

470

:

So the industry tried to take a shortcut

around the two things that we said.

471

:

You need more education and you need,

and the advisors needs more support

472

:

around due diligence and selection.

473

:

This just can't be a supermarket where

they go in and choose, and if they're

474

:

wrong, they can get out immediately.

475

:

Does that make sense?

476

:

Ryan: Yeah, Pete, that's fantastic.

477

:

And really, that's exactly what

I'm seeing on my side too, is.

478

:

I think you said at the beginning,

there's that misalignment.

479

:

Private markets, whether it's credit

equity, any illiquid investment, it can

480

:

be a fantastic, just like you say, it

can be a fantastic investment in the

481

:

right portfolio for the right investor.

482

:

At the very same time, that same

investment can be a terrible investment

483

:

in the wrong portfolio, wrong client.

484

:

So the alignment is so important.

485

:

And then you mentioned education.

486

:

That's so important all the way from

to the financial advisor to the client

487

:

because the worst thing that can happen

is when there's that first sign of

488

:

distress like we're having now, market

uncertainty, the crisis, the conflict.

489

:

Guess what a client's gonna do?

490

:

They're gonna run to the exits.

491

:

And we know it's behavioral and

that's what we're seeing now is.

492

:

They want liquidity and

whether even an interval fund

493

:

there, it's, it's semi-liquid.

494

:

And it, it poses issues and

that's what we're seeing.

495

:

And it all, I, like I said, it

all comes down to alignment and,

496

:

and education, so Fantastic.

497

:

Peter McGratty: just add to that what

we're seeing in the press right now

498

:

with some of this private credit news.

499

:

Everybody is experiencing this.

500

:

So again, this goes back to

due diligence and selection.

501

:

A, there's a very simple rule that

you often follow in when you're

502

:

investing in private markets.

503

:

And that is you wanna be in the

funds that don't want you as

504

:

an investor 'cause those funds.

505

:

Are doing so well at the investment

side that they don't really have

506

:

to work hard to raise capital.

507

:

They're very focused on

the investments themselves,

508

:

they tend to have a much.

509

:

I tend to have a more limited amount

of capital and a much narrower focus,

510

:

which allows 'em to really know what

their niche market is and manage.

511

:

And that makes it easier to

generate alpha and to manage risk.

512

:

You know, some of these interval

funds, the reason they created them

513

:

is 'cause they wanted everybody.

514

:

and they, maybe they weren't doing such

as good a job on the investment side.

515

:

And so I say that because.

516

:

for example, our private credit

fund has had no issues to date.

517

:

We tend to work with mid-tier

firms that are not the ones

518

:

at the conferences or on tv.

519

:

They're very, they're specialists in

their particular niche of the market.

520

:

And.

521

:

Knock on wood.

522

:

The private credit fund that we're

working with has had no issues because

523

:

they have a very narrow focus and are

not invested in this type of stuff

524

:

that some of these bigger funds are.

525

:

so I don't want everybody to

think, you know, use a broad

526

:

brush and say all funds are bad.

527

:

It again, comes back to this

due diligence and selection.

528

:

There are very good opportunities

even when markets are

529

:

difficult like they are now.

530

:

But clearly, I think you nailed

it on the head that the interval

531

:

fund, in particular, the structure

of that has, what was the word

532

:

you used in con misalignment.

533

:

and it absolutely is misalign

taking a long duration asset and

534

:

putting it in a short duration

vehicle, and that doesn't work.

535

:

Ryan: Yeah.

536

:

Yeah.

537

:

And let's talk about the due diligence.

538

:

I'm really glad you brought

that because I've gone to some

539

:

private market like super return

private market conferences, and.

540

:

Just the terminology they use.

541

:

I, I am, I'm moderating

a session and here I am.

542

:

I gotta pull up my phone

and Google it real quick.

543

:

Be like, oh my gosh.

544

:

What, what are they talking about?

545

:

It's not like they're talking about

when they're doing due diligence,

546

:

sharp ratios and standard dv.

547

:

It's a whole different world

for terminology due diligence.

548

:

How can you overcome, I mean, as

a financial advisor at that point,

549

:

should just kind of stick to what

you know and outsource that part.

550

:

Or like you said earlier, go

to somewhere where maybe yes,

551

:

you want private credit and.

552

:

There are some great managers out there.

553

:

Like you said, you got the right

clients, but then it's that next

554

:

step doing the due diligence,

which could be the hardest part.

555

:

Peter McGratty: It is the hardest part.

556

:

So I like to this is the interesting thing

about the whole evolution into private.

557

:

So there's, like I said, there's clearly

an interest and there's clear on the

558

:

part of advisors, clearly an interest

or role for it in a client's portfolio.

559

:

so why isn't it happening?

560

:

It's because of this education hurdle

and this due diligence and selection.

561

:

So it's very interesting to

watch the presentations of some

562

:

of the platforms out there.

563

:

They say.

564

:

give you access, you can come on

our platform and there's thousands

565

:

and thousands of funds that

you can choose from, and we've

566

:

put together some technology.

567

:

To you manage the administration of these

funds over their lifetime so that you can

568

:

do what you do best, which is pick funds.

569

:

that's their presentation.

570

:

And in my experience, when I go out

and meet with these they're saying

571

:

it's that choosing the fund is the

part that they're most terrified

572

:

of, which is why the adoption has

not happened as quickly as everybody

573

:

expected, because we have very strong.

574

:

Last 15 years, we've had very strong

public market returns, which are liquid.

575

:

And so why do I wanna risk my

client putting them into something

576

:

I don't fully understand?

577

:

That's not liquid because if you do it,

if you do the due diligence and selection

578

:

and you choose wrong, the, I like to say

the golden goose can become a rotten egg.

579

:

I mean, you could blow up your

client by doing something like that.

580

:

And so a lot of folks have said, you know,

I'm, I can't get my arms around this.

581

:

I'm just gonna stick to my knitting.

582

:

and so the two choices that you see.

583

:

Firm's takeout.

584

:

There are, I have the scale and size

to invest in a team and the technology

585

:

to actually do this correctly.

586

:

So, for example, using us Matt and

Ott, who runs the private market

587

:

investing function, advertent,

he's been doing this for 25 years.

588

:

He started doing it.

589

:

For the wealthiest folks in the Fidelity

network, including the friends and

590

:

family of the owners of Fidelity.

591

:

So he's grown up with a

lot of these managers.

592

:

He's seen how the different funds

and fund structures have behaved over

593

:

multiple market cycles over 25 years.

594

:

That requires.

595

:

firm that's willing to spend

to build that capability.

596

:

It's really an institutional capability.

597

:

And firms like us do that.

598

:

You see a lot of large

family offices do that.

599

:

But that's not something that a

lot of the smaller firms can do.

600

:

And even some of the big firms that

have tried it have found that they

601

:

haven't been terribly successful at it.

602

:

And so, so what you're seeing is the

emergence of a second a second option.

603

:

And that is, partnering with a third

party firm to provide you the due

604

:

diligence and support associated with it.

605

:

Some of 'em are literally

third parties much like the Ts.

606

:

Some of them are consultants.

607

:

in our case we're an independent RIA.

608

:

And when we do our due diligence

selection, our private our

609

:

principles, invest in everything

we recommend to our clients.

610

:

We put our best clients into them.

611

:

We've been doing this for a while

with knock on wood good success and,

612

:

we decided a couple of years ago

that we would invite, other RIAs to

613

:

invest their clients side by side

with ours if they chose and leverage

614

:

what we've put together in terms of a

team and the technology and structure.

615

:

knowing that.

616

:

We have as much to lose as they do.

617

:

We're doing it we're offering

it for the exact same reasons as

618

:

they do, and they can invest their

clients side by side with ours.

619

:

And the advantage for us is

that we get some more investing

620

:

in some of these funds.

621

:

We can negotiate better terms and

conditions for both our clients and

622

:

theirs when we invest in those funds.

623

:

Lower fees, lower

minimums, better covenants.

624

:

So if ever.

625

:

God forbid ever anything, ever go wrong.

626

:

We're on the advisory committee.

627

:

We have a say in how we just

how we solve the problem.

628

:

Ryan: Pete, that's fantastic.

629

:

Such a great conversation.

630

:

I knew it would, but you covered a lot,

brought a lot of great insight just from

631

:

the evolution, the difference between

consolidators, the independent channel.

632

:

Of the obstacles that's bringing how

they're different and then how you

633

:

can distinguish as a financial advisor

from your competitors get that leg up.

634

:

And that's potentially private

markets and the what that presents

635

:

the opportunity and challenges.

636

:

So thank you so much.

637

:

Where can our audience get

more information about vers?

638

:

Peter McGratty: They can visit our

website, Vernon's Capital Advisors or

639

:

they can if they wanna learn more about

how they can partner with us for some of

640

:

these solutions, and while they remain

independent, they can go to ria.plus

641

:

which is our website's web address

642

:

or they can clearly reach out to

me directly at p [email protected].

643

:

Ryan: Awesome.

644

:

Peter McGratty: See.

645

:

Ryan: thank you so much.

646

:

It was an honor to have you

on such a great conversation.

647

:

Thank you.

648

:

And thank you everyone for

listening to this episode of

649

:

zephyr's Adjusted for Risk podcast.

650

:

You can watch all of our other

episodes on the Zephyr YouTube channel.

651

:

Spotify.

652

:

Please be sure to like, subscribe

and give us a follow on LinkedIn.

653

:

Thank you very much and have

a great rest of your week.

654

:

Peter McGratty: So much Ryan.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube