Artwork for podcast I Love You, Too
(Rebroadcast) What to look for in a long-term partner
Episode 3014th January 2025 • I Love You, Too • Relationship Center
00:00:00 01:15:22

Share Episode

Shownotes

What makes a good long-term partner, according to science? And why is it important to be mindful when we are choosing who to settle down with? In this episode, we dig into the research about what to look for and — equally important — what not to look for in a long-term partner. Plus, how do you clarify what you need in a partner? How can you differentiate between dealbreakers and “nice-to-haves” so that you can more effectively date?

Key Takeaways

00:00:00 - Intro and episode overview

00:02:42 - Why be mindful of who we choose as a long-term partner?

00:06:14 - What science says about what makes a good long-term partner

00:25:19 - What doesn’t make someone a good partner, according to research

00:51:21 - How to clarify what you need in a partner

01:04:40 - How to clarify what you want vs. what you need

Resources Mentioned

For full show notes with links, visit relationshipcenter.com/podcast

Downloadable Guide: What to look for in a long-term partner (includes the Relationship Inventory and the Ideal Mate Exercise)

Warren Buffett says the most important decision you’ll ever make has nothing to do with your money or career

Study from Tel Aviv: Dissatisfaction with Married Life in Men Is Related to Increased Stroke and All-Cause Mortality

Harvard Study of Adult Development

Plays Well with Others: The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Relationships Is (Mostly) Wrong, By Eric Barker

The Gottman Institute

How to Not Die Alone, by Logan Ury

Deeper Dating, by Ken Page

People Are Dating All Wrong, According to Data Science

Have a question or comment? Email us at podcast@relationshipcenter.com. We love hearing from you!

If you’d like to work with one of the talented clinicians on our team, go to relationshipcenter.com/apply-now to apply for a free 30-minute consultation.

To get a monthly email with our best content, go to relationshipcenter.com/newsletter.

If something in this episode touched you, will you share it with a friend? That helps us reach more sweet humans like you.

Lastly, we’d love it if you would leave us a rating and review wherever you listen to podcasts. And be sure to hit subscribe while you’re there so you never miss an episode!

Transcripts

Jessica:

Hello, dear listener.

2

:

We are on a short break, and this

is a replay of one of our most

3

:

popular episodes ever, What to

Look for in a Long Term Partner.

4

:

Enjoy.

5

:

Depression, negative affect, which

is like experiencing feelings like

6

:

irritability and shame on a regular

basis, and insecure attachment

7

:

are all relationship risk factors.

8

:

And, if people, um, are able to,

um, Establish a, what we call a

9

:

secure functioning relationship.

10

:

A relationship where both people

feel safe and heard and important.

11

:

Um, those risk factors don't matter

12

:

from the relationship center.

13

:

I'm psychotherapist and dating coach

Jessica Engle, and this is, I Love

14

:

You too, a show about how to create

and sustain meaningful relationships.

15

:

Josh: I'm professional certified

coach Josh Van Vliet and on today's

16

:

episode we're going to talk about what

to look for in a long term partner.

17

:

We're so happy you're here and please

remember that this show is not a

18

:

substitute for a relationship with a

licensed mental health professional.

19

:

So this is such a juicy topic today.

20

:

I'm really excited to

get into this with you.

21

:

We're talking about what to

look for in a long term partner.

22

:

And we've got a couple of questions

that we're going to be digging into

23

:

around this that I'm so excited to

hear what you have to share because

24

:

I

25

:

Josh: don't know, in fact, what

you're going to share today.

26

:

And the first question, well, I'm just

going to share all three questions

27

:

actually as kind of an overview of where

we're headed in this episode and the kind

28

:

of things that we're going to get into.

29

:

Jessica: Great.

30

:

Josh: We're going to start with

what does science say about

31

:

what makes a good partner?

32

:

Jessica: Wonderful.

33

:

Josh: And then look at how do I

meaning you the listener, clarify

34

:

what you need in a partner.

35

:

How do you clarify what

you need in a partner?

36

:

Because there are some things that

may be pretty consistent across

37

:

relationships that indicate, uh, this

tends to work well in a relationship.

38

:

And there may be certain things

that you are looking for in a

39

:

partnership that may be different.

40

:

Mm-Hmm.

41

:

. Josh: And then, uh, we're gonna

look a little bit at this question

42

:

of how do I clarify what I want

versus what I need in a partner?

43

:

Because we.

44

:

I often hear from folks, there's a

particular, you know, there's someone

45

:

they're, they're dating perhaps, or

they're, they're exploring things with,

46

:

but they don't have this particular thing.

47

:

Jessica: Yeah.

48

:

Josh: How do I figure out, is

this actually a deal breaker?

49

:

Or is this something that is

Well, maybe nice to have, but

50

:

not actually all that important.

51

:

Jessica: Right.

52

:

Yeah, and I actually want to add one more

question to this list, and a question

53

:

that we'll start with, which is why be

mindful about who you choose as a partner?

54

:

It may seem a little obvious to some of

us, but I think for others, there may

55

:

be a sense of like, well, love, if it's

meant to be, it's meant to be, um, won't

56

:

I just, won't it just happen organically?

57

:

Why, why should I be thinking about this?

58

:

Um, yeah, I want to share with

you a few things about why it's

59

:

really great to think about this.

60

:

So, uh, billionaire Warren Buffett,

he says, marry the right person.

61

:

I'm serious about that.

62

:

It will make a difference in your life.

63

:

And he actually attributes his

success to his first marriage.

64

:

Really?

65

:

Yeah.

66

:

I didn't know that.

67

:

Yeah.

68

:

He says that his relationship with

his first wife changed him as a

69

:

person, uh, and really encouraged

him to go out and do big things.

70

:

Um, and I think that the, the

wonderful thing is that science

71

:

really confirms what he's saying.

72

:

Um, we have a lot of really great

research, uh, showing that the key to a

73

:

happy life is meaningful relationships.

74

:

And even more specifically with

romantic love, we really know,

75

:

uh, the impact of happy versus

unhappy long term relationships.

76

:

So for example, we know that

happy long term relationships

77

:

produce healthier human beings.

78

:

We actually have less, say, heart

disease or other health issues

79

:

when we have a stable relationship.

80

:

Uh, and then we also know that people

actually live longer when they have

81

:

healthy long term relationships.

82

:

Um, we, I wanted to share this really

cool study that recently came out of

83

:

Tel Aviv, uh, that looked at health data

for 10, 000 Israeli men over 30 years.

84

:

And they found that men who were

dissatisfied with their marriage were

85

:

19 percent more likely on average.

86

:

To die during the 32 year study.

87

:

Mm hmm.

88

:

Dark.

89

:

Uh, and then strokes were 69 percent more

common among those who felt they had an

90

:

unsuccessful marriage compared to those

who indicated a very successful marriage.

91

:

They actually found that all

of these risks were the same

92

:

as if these men were smoking.

93

:

Wow.

94

:

Or not exercising.

95

:

Josh: Wow.

96

:

Jessica: Yeah, so pretty huge.

97

:

There's also a really famous study

out of Harvard, the Harvard study

98

:

of adult development that tracked a

couple of groups of men since:

99

:

This is a really sort of milestone piece

of research and they found among other

100

:

things that secure relationships at

midlife were a better predictor of health

101

:

30 years later than cholesterol levels.

102

:

And just in general, those researchers,

their big takeaway from all of

103

:

that data was if you want a happy

life, have happy relationships.

104

:

Josh: That's so interesting.

105

:

I was just reading a wonderful book

about relationships by Eric Parker,

106

:

and he's citing I think some of that

same research, but he also says.

107

:

That, uh, like happiness and sense

of well being for people who are

108

:

in, uh, unhappy relationships was

worse than if you were single.

109

:

Yeah.

110

:

Josh: There's like this, this high

benefit to being in a, uh, a meaningful,

111

:

uh, kind of secure functioning

relationship, uh, that kind of blows

112

:

everything else out of the water.

113

:

But there's also this flip side of.

114

:

If you choose the wrong person or be in

the wrong relationship for you, uh, it can

115

:

have a very big impact on your well being.

116

:

Jessica: Yes.

117

:

Like

118

:

Josh: you were saying in some of

the studies from, from Tel Aviv.

119

:

Jessica: Yeah, absolutely.

120

:

I'm sure there are people

hearing right now that are

121

:

like, yeah, no, I've lived that.

122

:

Not news.

123

:

Not news to me.

124

:

It's a very clear impact when we're

in a dysfunctional relationship.

125

:

Yeah.

126

:

Yeah.

127

:

So, maybe let's talk next about

what science tells us about what

128

:

makes a good long term partner.

129

:

Josh: Yeah.

130

:

I'm so curious to hear, uh, hear

what you've collected on this.

131

:

Jessica: Mm hmm.

132

:

Yeah.

133

:

So, I'm gonna be pulling, um,

partially from Logan Ury's

134

:

book, uh, How to Not Die Alone.

135

:

And she's really pulling

from the Gottmans.

136

:

The good old Gottmans.

137

:

Josh: Source of, uh, so much

wonderful wisdom about relationships.

138

:

Jessica: That's right.

139

:

So the Gottmans are a

couple up in Seattle.

140

:

Um, John Gottman, they, they've been

married for several decades, I think.

141

:

And John, uh, was the lead of

something called the Love Lab,

142

:

where they actually brought couples

in and, uh, really, uh, made love.

143

:

Watch them closely, and over time they

were able to pick up on things that

144

:

predicted the end of a relationship

within a really insane rate, I think

145

:

it was like 93 percent accuracy.

146

:

So one of the things that they looked

at is the characteristics that are, they

147

:

associate with what they call relationship

masters versus relationship disasters.

148

:

So we're going to talk about

seven of these characteristics.

149

:

The first is emotional stability.

150

:

Okay, so, somebody who can really

self regulate, not give in to anger

151

:

and impulsivity is going to be a

wonderful partner in the long term.

152

:

Second, we've got kindness, so think

generosity, empathy, supportiveness.

153

:

Third, we have loyalty.

154

:

Capacity to remain connected

and committed even when things

155

:

are getting really difficult.

156

:

Uh, fourth, we have a growth mindset.

157

:

Okay?

158

:

So instead of being, uh, you know,

taken aback by challenges, uh, self

159

:

critical, they're going to be motivated

by those challenges, willing to learn.

160

:

Okay?

161

:

Personality that brings out the

best in you is number five, right?

162

:

How are you around that person?

163

:

How fun are you?

164

:

Secure, are you anxious?

165

:

Whatever it is.

166

:

Uh, sixth is skills to fight well.

167

:

They can make repair attempts and

really de escalate, uh, conflicts.

168

:

They're really gonna invite in your

perspective, make you feel seen and heard.

169

:

And then seventh is the ability

to make hard decisions with you.

170

:

So the capacity to really, like,

take turns leading and following

171

:

somebody who can remain supportive

and collaborative rather than, say,

172

:

blaming when things go difficult.

173

:

Mm hmm.

174

:

Josh: Mm hmm.

175

:

Interesting.

176

:

I'm curious.

177

:

I want to dig in a little

bit more to some of these.

178

:

Emotional stability.

179

:

Mm hmm.

180

:

Josh: This one just jumped out at

me because I know for myself, and

181

:

I imagine this may be true for some

of the folks, uh, listening, I don't

182

:

always feel emotionally stable.

183

:

There are plenty of times when I feel,

you know, anxious or, uh, you know, having

184

:

a hard time processing something that

I don't feel like I'm acting my best.

185

:

Jessica: Yeah.

186

:

Josh: And so I'm, I'm curious to kind

of get into the nuance of that because

187

:

On the one hand, I can totally see what

they mean when someone is so caught up in

188

:

their, uh, you know, worries or anxiety or

anger or impulsivity that they can't kind

189

:

of act, they can't Pause, have a moment

of pause between the experience they're

190

:

having and the action that they take.

191

:

It can be very difficult.

192

:

It can cause some very

painful experiences.

193

:

Jessica: Yeah.

194

:

Josh: And at the same time, we're all kind

of emotionally unstable some of the time.

195

:

Jessica: Absolutely.

196

:

Yeah.

197

:

Yeah.

198

:

I think that's a really great point.

199

:

We certainly don't want to take

these points as, um, encouragement

200

:

to be perfect or to be, um, we

don't have to be always happy.

201

:

Or calm.

202

:

Um, yeah, so actually I might jump

forward a little bit to another, uh,

203

:

study that was really interesting by

a researcher called Samantha Joel.

204

:

She used machine learning models to assess

whether specific traits in a mate were

205

:

predictive of happiness with that mate.

206

:

Josh: Wait, what?

207

:

She used machine learning models

To tell if certain traits were

208

:

predictive of happiness in a mate.

209

:

Jessica: Yeah.

210

:

Josh: That's mind blowing to me right now.

211

:

Okay, keep going.

212

:

No,

213

:

Jessica: that's okay.

214

:

It's, it's an amazing piece of research.

215

:

Um, we'll talk a little bit more

about all of that in a bit, but

216

:

the thing I want to point out is,

what they found is that we are.

217

:

We look for traits, typically, that don't

have to do with long term happiness.

218

:

Don't have an impact on long

term happiness in a relationship.

219

:

Josh: Okay.

220

:

Sure.

221

:

So, like, for example, height.

222

:

Jessica: Right.

223

:

Perfect example.

224

:

And What she found is that, um,

interestingly enough, the thing that is

225

:

the biggest predictor of happiness in a

relationship is your partners, how they

226

:

would, um, respond to questions like, are

you happy, um, prior to the relationship?

227

:

Are you happy, uh, are

you free of depression?

228

:

Josh: Like how the partner

229

:

Jessica: would

230

:

Josh: respond.

231

:

So let's say I'm, I'm dating someone

and we're, we're talking about how this

232

:

person would respond before we'd met.

233

:

Jessica: Yes.

234

:

Josh: To saying, are you happy?

235

:

Jessica: Right.

236

:

And so, you know, this to me felt

a little bit like not great news

237

:

because, um, um, I I have a biased sample

as therapist and I see a lot of people who

238

:

struggle with depression and with anxiety

and particularly since:

239

:

like a tall order for everyone to, you

know, be in a position where they get

240

:

to say like, yeah, I'm perfectly happy.

241

:

That

242

:

Josh: would be nice if we were all in that

spot before we got into a relationship.

243

:

Jessica: Right.

244

:

Yeah.

245

:

And so, what was encouraging to me, you

know, they said, um, Depression, negative

246

:

affect, which is like experiencing

feelings like irritability and shame on

247

:

a regular basis, and insecure attachment

are all relationship risk factors.

248

:

And if people, um, are able to,

um, to establish what we call a

249

:

secure functioning relationship,

a relationship where both people

250

:

feel safe and heard and important.

251

:

Um, those risk factors don't matter.

252

:

Yeah.

253

:

Isn't that fascinating?

254

:

Josh: That's, uh, that's very encouraging.

255

:

Jessica: Yes.

256

:

Yeah.

257

:

Josh: And it points to something actually

really interesting to me that I've been

258

:

thinking about as we've been preparing

for this episode that is how much of this

259

:

is about like the individual qualities

that we're looking for in somebody.

260

:

And how much of it is about the

relationship, who we are together.

261

:

Jessica: Yes.

262

:

100%.

263

:

And those things are connected.

264

:

Right.

265

:

You know, I think what this brings me

back to is like, yeah, you could have

266

:

depression, you could have anxiety,

you could have attachment issues.

267

:

Many of us do.

268

:

And the thing you have power over

is building relationship skill.

269

:

What does it look like to respond even

when you are feeling emotionally unstable?

270

:

Right?

271

:

Can you have those feelings and also be in

relationship in a way that is functional

272

:

and um, you know, supportive of your bond?

273

:

Josh: Right.

274

:

That's, yeah, that's a, that's a really

good point because it's like we're not

275

:

saying you have to have cleared up all of

your feelings or your insecurities or your

276

:

worries or anxieties or doubts or whatever

before you get into a relationship.

277

:

It's really that focus on that

skill set of, okay, Can I develop

278

:

my capacity to have that experience?

279

:

And still relate in a way with other

people, with this person, uh, that kind

280

:

of, how would you put it, I'm blanking on

the words here, but like, it's functional.

281

:

Yeah.

282

:

Like it gives them a chance to

support you, gives, you know.

283

:

Jessica: Enhances the closeness

rather than increases it.

284

:

Okay.

285

:

So, yeah, a great example I think

is, uh, Um, let's say you are

286

:

going through a bout of depression.

287

:

For some people depression actually

manifests as irritability or anger.

288

:

And perhaps, you know, everything's

kind of getting to you.

289

:

So in the emotionally unstable, you

know, quote unquote, um, realm, the

290

:

way that might get expressed is your

partner comes in, maybe meets you late

291

:

for a date, and you chew them out.

292

:

Josh: Right.

293

:

Jessica: Right?

294

:

It's like,

295

:

Josh: what the hell's wrong with you?

296

:

I've been waiting for you.

297

:

That's

298

:

Jessica: right.

299

:

Josh: You always do this.

300

:

You're so inconsiderate of my time.

301

:

That kind of

302

:

Jessica: thing.

303

:

Yeah.

304

:

And we can all see where that goes.

305

:

No where fun.

306

:

And so the other option would

be, okay, I'm feeling really

307

:

irritable and my partner shows

up late, and I say, sweetheart.

308

:

I'm really struggling right now with,

with some depression or, you know,

309

:

a down mood and I'm just noticing

that I'm feeling a little irritable.

310

:

And I just need you to know it really

means a lot to me when you show up.

311

:

Josh: Even as you're saying that, I'm

like, oh, I want to be there for you.

312

:

Jessica: Yes.

313

:

Yeah.

314

:

So being able to go into naming

the emotion and asking for what we

315

:

need, that right there is emotional

stability because, hello, you're human.

316

:

You're going to have a lot of emotions.

317

:

Can you, um, you know, draw

people closer by expressing them

318

:

without a lot of, um, hard edges?

319

:

Josh: Yeah.

320

:

Yeah.

321

:

And I just loved how you, what you

modeled there of like, a way of

322

:

sharing same, you know, experience

that this person is having, but even

323

:

as I was listening to you, I felt

like, oh, I want to get closer to you.

324

:

I want to support you.

325

:

You're, you're sharing this thing that's

clearly maybe a little hard to share.

326

:

Jessica: Yeah.

327

:

Josh: Maybe feels a little scary to share.

328

:

And that draws me closer

versus the, the criticizing or

329

:

kind of

330

:

Josh: lashing out irritability

that definitely pushes me away.

331

:

And I'm like, okay, I don't want to

really interact with you right now.

332

:

Jessica: Yeah, absolutely.

333

:

Josh: Even if you know on some level

that person may be suffering and

334

:

actually isn't really about you.

335

:

Jessica: Yes.

336

:

Yeah.

337

:

Yeah.

338

:

And I really want to emphasize here,

people may have heard those examples

339

:

and kind of go like, I don't know how

to do that or that's very foreign to me.

340

:

And, yeah, I just want to emphasize this

is not like something you're born with.

341

:

This is something that we learn.

342

:

And so, if that's something that

you don't feel confident you

343

:

can do, great news, you can.

344

:

It's going to take maybe a little bit of

practice and training, but totally doable.

345

:

Josh: Yeah, that's, I love that.

346

:

That's like the good news of all of this

is that there are some very discreet

347

:

skills that we can learn both for

ourselves to name and understand what

348

:

we're experiencing, be able to express

it in a productive way, and then also

349

:

how to relate to other people around us.

350

:

In those moments.

351

:

Jessica: Yes.

352

:

Josh: And, and on the other side of

it, right, there's both how we, uh,

353

:

are with what we're experiencing, but

then there's also when we are in that,

354

:

the other partner's shoes, when our

partner is going through something.

355

:

Jessica: Yeah.

356

:

Josh: How do we be with them in

a way that, uh, is supportive

357

:

and loving and produces more

closeness instead of more distance.

358

:

Jessica: Right, and it's an

expression of some of these other

359

:

traits that we were talking about.

360

:

Kindness.

361

:

Loyalty.

362

:

Right?

363

:

Can you show up in a moment where your

partner is distressed in a way that, um,

364

:

yeah, again, allows you to get closer.

365

:

Mm hmm.

366

:

Josh: I know, uh, one of the things

that comes up for me when I hear

367

:

the word loyalty is, uh, a worry

that's like, Well, what if I don't

368

:

know if they're my person yet?

369

:

Mm

370

:

Jessica: hmm.

371

:

Josh: Right?

372

:

Like, I don't want to just be

loyal to whoever walks in the door.

373

:

Jessica: Yes.

374

:

Josh: And so there's, and we're

looking at what, like, what to

375

:

look for in a long term partner.

376

:

Mm hmm.

377

:

Josh: And so there's, there's an

interesting tension here between

378

:

loyalty is a wonderful quality.

379

:

Yes.

380

:

You

381

:

Josh: really do, it makes a big difference

in a partner, and at the same time we're

382

:

trying to assess, like You know, you

don't want to just be loyal immediately.

383

:

Jessica: Absolutely.

384

:

Well, yeah, I think there's a

lot we could pull out in there.

385

:

Dating is about assessing what

is possible in a relationship.

386

:

Yeah.

387

:

And so, I think that there's a way to

be loyal without having, Um, clarity or

388

:

a stated intention to be there forever.

389

:

Josh: If we haven't made an explicit

commitment to each other yet, like

390

:

how do I know if loyalty is present?

391

:

Um, like what, you know,

how am I assessing that?

392

:

How do I know, how do I

know if they're very loyal?

393

:

Jessica: Yeah, totally.

394

:

So, um, one way to look at that,

that I appreciate Logan talking

395

:

about in her book, um, is to look

at their other relationships.

396

:

So, do they have relationships with

people from earlier in their life?

397

:

Um, there's some exceptions to that,

some people move around, um, and, You

398

:

know, are they, are they meeting with

people from different phases of life,

399

:

because that indicates they, they do

retain relationships over time, um, and

400

:

then also just kind of getting a sense

of, of their relationships and, um, they

401

:

may make comments that indicate to you

either that they stick around when things

402

:

get hard or maybe they cut and run.

403

:

The other thing to look at there, I

think, is when you are in distress.

404

:

In some way.

405

:

How do they respond to that?

406

:

Do they pull away?

407

:

Do they shame or criticize you?

408

:

Or do they stay close?

409

:

Do they offer support?

410

:

And even, you know, I hear the piece

in here about like, it's not always

411

:

going to be appropriate at certain

levels of dating for someone to

412

:

like be your, your go to person.

413

:

Like maybe you've gone on a few dates.

414

:

Right.

415

:

It's not appropriate really to,

you know, lean on them in the

416

:

middle of a crisis potentially.

417

:

Right.

418

:

And at the level that you're

at, are they showing up?

419

:

Okay.

420

:

So, I can imagine someone who's gone,

you know, on a few dates with someone

421

:

else, um, if they understand that

person's going through something,

422

:

they might be reaching out, right?

423

:

To say like, I'm thinking about you

and I'm wondering how you're doing.

424

:

Is there anything I can do to support you?

425

:

Yeah.

426

:

Versus like, Gosh, I told that

person my grandma's sick and I

427

:

haven't heard from them in a week.

428

:

Josh: There's a whole, uh, other

podcast or multiple podcasts I'm

429

:

sure will, will make about, uh,

episodes will make about pacing.

430

:

Jessica: Yes.

431

:

Josh: Uh, cause that's, it's almost

like we kind of can't talk about what to

432

:

look for in a partner without looking,

talking about pacing and how to, uh, cause

433

:

some of this happens over time, right?

434

:

You're not going to know all of this

from the first date or the first

435

:

month, you know, some of these things

that you'll learn as you're saying.

436

:

out of experiencing each other at

each stage of dating and seeing

437

:

how are they responding when I'm

in distress or how, how are we

438

:

together when we're in distress.

439

:

Facing a difficult challenge.

440

:

Mm-Hmm.

441

:

difficult decision to have to make.

442

:

Um, you're gonna learn so much

out of that versus out of what

443

:

we may say about ourselves or,

444

:

Jessica: you know.

445

:

Absolutely.

446

:

I'm so looking forward

to that conversation.

447

:

And, um, yeah, I think that

what, what really struck me

448

:

about these different, uh.

449

:

These seven qualities I've, I've named

versus the ones we'll go over later of

450

:

like what are the common things people

look for that, that don't actually

451

:

correlate to relationship happiness.

452

:

Mm.

453

:

The ones that we're talking about that,

that the Gottman's, you know, uncovered

454

:

is they're, they take time to assess.

455

:

Right.

456

:

And the other ones are like, you can

assess them basically on a dating app.

457

:

Um, and so that, I think that's, Maybe

one of the like, truths of, of dating

458

:

mindfully for a long term relationship.

459

:

We have to take time to assess,

and we have to allow that

460

:

that's, that's just part of it.

461

:

Josh: Yeah.

462

:

That's a really good point.

463

:

Jessica: I have one more, sort of like,

Beautiful list that, uh, I think is

464

:

a great way to wrap our minds around,

like, what makes a relationship

465

:

master who is emotionally receptive.

466

:

Okay.

467

:

This comes from, excuse me,

comes from Ken Page's work.

468

:

He wrote the book and has a great

podcast called Deeper Dating.

469

:

One of my dating coach,

uh, mentors from afar.

470

:

Um, and.

471

:

He likes to talk about attractions

of inspiration, so attractions

472

:

of inspiration are relationships

characterized by ease and warmth, and we

473

:

can identify an attraction of inspiration

with a few different questions.

474

:

For example, are you inspired

by your partner's mostly

475

:

consistent caring and acceptance?

476

:

Are you inspired by their goodness,

their decency and integrity?

477

:

Is your love fueled by respect for

the kind of person your partner is?

478

:

Um, are you both willing to do

the hard work of healing the

479

:

relationship's areas of weakness?

480

:

Do you like who you are in

the presence of your partner?

481

:

Uh, does he or she make you a better you?

482

:

Josh: Mm hmm.

483

:

I love that list.

484

:

It feels like it also points

towards, um, how are we together.

485

:

Jessica: Yes.

486

:

Josh: Which, I've just been

loving that frame recently.

487

:

It's like, because there is this

interesting interplay between, there

488

:

are some qualities that you know,

you do want to look for in a partner.

489

:

Mm hmm.

490

:

Like you were mentioning earlier, uh,

from the Gottmans, and there's also this

491

:

quality of like, and how are we together?

492

:

And we relate differently to different

people, and kind of different people

493

:

bring out different qualities in us.

494

:

Jessica: Yeah.

495

:

Josh: And so, it's not like a kind of.

496

:

Uh, right, wrong, uh, kind of assessment

of like, oh, good partner, bad partner.

497

:

It's like, it's really more like

good partner for me or not, like, you

498

:

know, what is our relationship like?

499

:

How are we together?

500

:

Are we, as you're saying, like,

you know, emotionally responsive?

501

:

Are we kind?

502

:

Do we respect each other?

503

:

Is there room for, uh, both of us in

the relationship, both of what we need

504

:

and want, um, what's important to us?

505

:

Jessica: Yeah.

506

:

Yeah, it makes me think about a

couple therapists, you know, we

507

:

like to talk about there's the

individuals and then there's this third

508

:

organism, which is the relationship.

509

:

And we're really, you know, a couple

therapists is actually treating the

510

:

relationship, not the individuals.

511

:

And, um, yeah, so I think in

dating we can be assessing the

512

:

we ness from the very beginning.

513

:

So this makes me want to talk

a little bit more about what.

514

:

Doesn't make someone a good partner.

515

:

Ken Page, he talks about the attractions

of inspiration and he also talks

516

:

about what he refers to as refers

to as attractions of deprivation.

517

:

So, these are relationships I

hear clients talk about often.

518

:

They're easy to get caught in and, um,

they are characterized by a sense of lack.

519

:

Okay, so when I think of attractions

of deprivation, I tend to think of,

520

:

um, do you know the myth of Tantalus?

521

:

Uh, no.

522

:

From Greek mythology?

523

:

Okay.

524

:

So he was a king that was punished by,

uh, Zeus, uh, for some, something he did.

525

:

I don't remember what he did, but

he was punished by being placed

526

:

in a pool and near a fruit tree.

527

:

But the pool would, the water would rise

up right below his mouth and then go back

528

:

down over and over again all day long.

529

:

And he was punished.

530

:

He was very, very thirsty, and so

he wasn't able to drink any water,

531

:

and the fruit tree was like just out

of reach, and he was super hungry.

532

:

This is his eternity, so,

533

:

yeah, and so I think these attractions of

deprivation can have that experience where

534

:

it's like, it kind of feels like it's, we

almost get the love that we really need,

535

:

but then we never quite get all of it.

536

:

Josh: It reminds me of the

kind of intermittent, uh,

537

:

uh, reward reinforcement.

538

:

Jessica: Beautiful.

539

:

Yeah.

540

:

Josh: Um.

541

:

You probably know the studies better

than I do, but, uh, the kind of thing

542

:

where they've shown where rats and mice

and cages, and I think this has also

543

:

been shown to be true in humans, where

if we're intermittently reinforced for

544

:

doing something, like we do something

and sometimes we get a great result

545

:

Jessica: and

546

:

Josh: other times we don't.

547

:

It's more addictive, more engaging,

kind of, we want to do it more than

548

:

if we always get a good result.

549

:

Jessica: That's right, yeah.

550

:

Josh: And this is what drives

gambling and, you know, all

551

:

these other things, anyway.

552

:

Jessica: Yeah, it's a fascinating finding.

553

:

Yeah, they found that the, the mice,

when the mice were able to consistently

554

:

push a lever and get food or some sort of

substance, They were much less interested

555

:

in the lever than the rats who pushed

the lever, uh, and the food or drugs or

556

:

whatever only came out some of the time.

557

:

Yeah.

558

:

And that's exactly right.

559

:

And, um, Ken talks about that.

560

:

This is what we're talking about is

they're very, very addictive because that

561

:

circuitry gets activated inside of us.

562

:

We feel like maybe if I just try harder.

563

:

Josh: If I just do it right, if

I just communicate in the right

564

:

way to them, or if I just really

565

:

Jessica: Yeah, so characteristics

of an attraction of deprivation.

566

:

People may recognize

these from their lives.

567

:

This is when somebody may exhibit

lying or cheating behaviors.

568

:

Selfish behavior, unavailability.

569

:

Josh: When you say selfish

behavior, I've been selfish, so

570

:

Jessica: I just want to clarify,

571

:

Josh: what are we talking about

when we say selfish behavior?

572

:

Jessica: Yeah.

573

:

Good question.

574

:

Well, um, okay, how about you're on a

hike and you, your ankle starts to hurt

575

:

a little bit and your partner, um, really

just kind of pushes you to keep going.

576

:

Josh: Okay.

577

:

Yeah.

578

:

Yeah.

579

:

It's like they're, they're more

excited about finishing the hike.

580

:

Then they are about taking

care of you and your ankle.

581

:

Jessica: You got it?

582

:

Mm-Hmm.

583

:

. Uh, so selfish behavior unavailability

that maybe can't or won't commit to

584

:

fully, don't have time to spend with you.

585

:

Addictive behavior.

586

:

Hurtful behavior, right?

587

:

Maybe they're making digs or, um,

otherwise not really respecting you.

588

:

Uh, untreated or unresolved

emotional or psychological disorders.

589

:

Josh: And so again, with the untreated

or unresolved psychological disorders,

590

:

we're not talking about, uh, if you might

be experiencing depression or anxiety,

591

:

it's like a rule out for a relationship.

592

:

We're really talking, like, what

would be an example of that?

593

:

Jessica: Yeah, so untreated or unresolved,

uh, emotional psychological disorders

594

:

that might include bipolar disorder,

uh, that is not being addressed through

595

:

therapy or medication, uh, or major

depressive disorder where the person

596

:

really just refuses to get help for

it, were definitely, again, um, We

597

:

don't want you to come away from this

thinking you have to be perfect or,

598

:

um, you know, perfectly well adjusted

in order to have a relationship.

599

:

Many, many people have chronic depression

and anxiety that they have to manage.

600

:

Um, so maybe, uh, analogy might be

like, Um, Say you've, you've, you

601

:

know, are dating and you meet somebody

who's diabetic but they refuse to

602

:

take insulin, for example, right?

603

:

Um, if somebody is experiencing

depression, anxiety, how

604

:

are they managing that?

605

:

Are they going to therapy?

606

:

Are they taking other self care?

607

:

Approaches or not.

608

:

Josh: Right, like are they

getting support in some way?

609

:

Are they engaged in their healing?

610

:

Jessica: Mm

611

:

hmm.

612

:

Josh: All right.

613

:

And, and I would imagine also some of

these things point back to some of the

614

:

other criteria on this list, right?

615

:

Are they able to show up

in a way that is engaging?

616

:

that is consistently available, where

if, you know, their, uh, experience of

617

:

their mental health is such that, uh,

they may still be getting support, but

618

:

it's, it's so intense right now that

they just aren't consistently available.

619

:

Jessica: Yes.

620

:

Josh: That may not be, at this

time, the right fit for a partner.

621

:

Jessica: Mm hmm.

622

:

That's right.

623

:

Josh: And it can be so, this is the

thing I think about these attractions

624

:

of deprivation, it can be so tempting,

uh, to want to be there to help them

625

:

heal, whether it's from addiction or

whether it's from a major mental illness.

626

:

And, you know, I know I've sometimes

had the thought like, well, if

627

:

I'm not there, who else will be?

628

:

Um,

629

:

Josh: which is putting a lot of

responsibility on your shoulders.

630

:

Kind of over emphasizing or

maybe a distortion of our own

631

:

importance sometimes, right?

632

:

Like, oh, I have to save this person,

um, when it's like, it's not about

633

:

me or it's not about us, right?

634

:

It's about, uh,

635

:

are they really available for the

kind of relationship, the kind

636

:

of mutual, equal relationship

637

:

Jessica: that

638

:

Josh: we're really craving underneath?

639

:

Yeah,

640

:

Jessica: well, and I, I imagine there

may be a question in some listeners minds

641

:

of like, what about the loyalty piece?

642

:

Right.

643

:

Um, and I think that, again,

that, that comes back.

644

:

So to flesh that out a little bit.

645

:

Okay.

646

:

You just told me that I should be

loyal and look for loyal partners,

647

:

and then you're also telling me,

like, if someone's going through

648

:

something and they aren't available for

relationship, I should just cut and run.

649

:

That seems like it

doesn't quite make sense.

650

:

Um, and I think, again, this comes

back to, like, are they doing

651

:

anything to take care of themselves?

652

:

Um, there is, I think with the

loyalty piece, we have to balance

653

:

loyalty to ourselves and loyalty

to the other person, right?

654

:

If you're letting go of all of your

needs and not taking care of yourself,

655

:

that actually doesn't benefit the other

person or the relationship at all.

656

:

Josh: And I think there's also an

interesting nuance here between what

657

:

are we looking for at the beginning of a

relationship and how are we with someone

658

:

who we're in a committed partnership with.

659

:

Jessica: Yes.

660

:

Josh: Yes.

661

:

And that, uh, Yes.

662

:

You know, loyalty obviously shows up

differently at each stage, as you were

663

:

saying earlier, at each stage of dating,

uh, we may Uh, want to pause before

664

:

getting into a relationship with somebody,

for example, who's experiencing addiction.

665

:

Jessica: Yeah.

666

:

Josh: Untreated addiction.

667

:

Jessica: Right.

668

:

Josh: Um, that may not be the right

time to be in a relationship with

669

:

that person, uh, versus if perhaps

our committed partner, uh, becomes,

670

:

you know, has an accident, goes,

starts getting pain medication

671

:

for their pain, becomes addicted.

672

:

Mm hmm.

673

:

Josh: It's a different, maybe

a different conversation.

674

:

There is still perhaps a choice point at

some point in there, you know, we don't

675

:

need to go too far down that rabbit hole.

676

:

But it's just there may be a different

kind of, uh, process or like a way of

677

:

showing up in that moment that we wouldn't

have done at a stage of relationship

678

:

where it's like three weeks into knowing

this person, it's not appropriate for

679

:

us to be supporting them at that level.

680

:

Jessica: Yes.

681

:

Yeah, I think that's a really great point.

682

:

Uh, and I think part of what's happening

in here when we're dating is we're

683

:

really, we're making guesses at how

someone will be long term based on

684

:

the information that we're getting.

685

:

Josh: Which is kind of a foolish

endeavor given how completely

686

:

unpredictable life is and, you know, just

fundamentally we just don't know, right?

687

:

We just, we never know how

things are going to turn out.

688

:

We're just kind of taking our best guess.

689

:

We're gathering the information

we can and making Yeah,

690

:

Jessica: it is a bit of a fool's

errand, and we have to do our

691

:

best with that process, right?

692

:

And so, I think that, you know, if at the

beginning of a relationship, you know,

693

:

you You realize, gosh, okay, this person

is really suffering from an addiction.

694

:

Part of the thinking there is,

well, if this is what I'm finding

695

:

them in right now, the best

predictor of the future is the past.

696

:

Uh, and so I'm going to make the

assumption that if he's not willing to get

697

:

help or they're not willing to get help,

then this, this may only get worse, right?

698

:

Many mental health issues

without treatment just get worse.

699

:

Um, and so at that point, It may not be

accurate, but it may be self protective.

700

:

So those are the characteristics

of an attraction of deprivation.

701

:

I want to shift over to, back to

Logan Ury's book, and some of the

702

:

things that she pointed out are, uh,

easily observable traits that a lot of

703

:

people look for when they are dating.

704

:

That research actually shows,

Do not contribute to long

705

:

term relationship happiness.

706

:

Josh: I'm so excited for this list.

707

:

Jessica: I wonder if you have

guesses what is on this list.

708

:

Josh: I may have poked a little bit at

Logan Urie's book as I was preparing

709

:

for this episode, so I may have

some thoughts or ideas, um, but I'm

710

:

excited to get into the piece around

attraction as well, which may be part

711

:

of this list and maybe also a good one.

712

:

Separate conversation, but, uh, but go

ahead, I want to hear what's on this list.

713

:

Jessica: So the four things that

she, uh, discusses are wealth, and

714

:

we'll add a little caveat here.

715

:

Money does matter in general for

happiness and for relationships,

716

:

but only to a point.

717

:

So after your needs are, are really

met and a little more than that,

718

:

you know, going for the wealthiest

partner isn't going to have any

719

:

impact on relationship happiness.

720

:

The second one is physical attractiveness.

721

:

Uh, the reasoning there is lust fades.

722

:

Right?

723

:

Even if you've got the hottest,

uh, relation, or hottest partner

724

:

you could imagine, your lust

is going to fade over time.

725

:

It's not going to go away necessarily,

but, um, we have to have more

726

:

than that for the happiness.

727

:

Uh, similar personalities.

728

:

That's

729

:

Jessica: one I think will

maybe surprise some people.

730

:

And also shared hobbies.

731

:

Shared hobbies do not, it's, it's

so funny to me, I love that this

732

:

is on this list because I always

hear people say, well, I need to

733

:

find someone with common interests.

734

:

And that is not my experience

as a, as a dating coach seeing

735

:

a lot of relationships form.

736

:

That really doesn't, it doesn't matter

as much as people think it does.

737

:

Right.

738

:

Josh: Interesting.

739

:

Jessica: Okay.

740

:

Josh: Okay.

741

:

So wealth, physical attractiveness.

742

:

What's the third one?

743

:

Jessica: Similar personalities.

744

:

Similar personalities.

745

:

Like, I'm introverted

and I need an introvert.

746

:

Josh: Mm hmm.

747

:

Shared interests.

748

:

Okay.

749

:

But I think we should

talk about attraction.

750

:

Great.

751

:

Because that's, that's, uh, you know,

I think some of the other ones are

752

:

maybe a little bit less surprising

or less kind of controversial.

753

:

But a lot of us have this thought

that's like, well, I've got

754

:

to be attracted to the person.

755

:

Mm

756

:

Josh: hmm.

757

:

We don't even necessarily know what that

means, I think, when we say that, right?

758

:

There's like a lot of levels of

attraction that when we really unpack

759

:

it, there are a lot of different ways

that we're attracted to somebody.

760

:

So yeah, I'm, I'm curious to hear what

your thoughts are on this, because

761

:

I hear what Logan Urie is saying

about physical attractiveness and

762

:

that fades over time and that makes

sense and our bodies change, right?

763

:

So it's like even if you marry

the absolute hottest 20 years, are

764

:

they still gonna look like that?

765

:

No, they're gonna have whatever, they're

gonna have little wrinkles and things and,

766

:

you know, I've gained weight and whatever.

767

:

And so it's, if you're just relying

on that to keep your connection

768

:

going, you're going to be in trouble.

769

:

Jessica: Yes.

770

:

Josh: For any kind of meaningful

long term relationship.

771

:

And we want to be attracted

to the person we're with.

772

:

Jessica: Absolutely.

773

:

Absolutely.

774

:

Yes.

775

:

We want to be attracted to our partner.

776

:

It's important to be

attracted to our partner.

777

:

In fact, um, sexual satisfaction

is one huge piece of long

778

:

term relationship happiness.

779

:

Um, Now, whether you are attracted

to someone is a little different

780

:

from physical attractiveness.

781

:

Josh: Tell me more.

782

:

Jessica: So, let's think about

physical attractiveness as like, So,

783

:

what does society say about whether

or not this person is attractive?

784

:

Okay.

785

:

So, um, going back to Ken Page, one of

the concepts he presents that I love

786

:

is, uh, you know, looking at partners,

uh, looking at your attraction to

787

:

partners on a scale of zero to 10.

788

:

And what he's suggesting there

is you're not looking at, is this

789

:

person a 10 in the eyes of society?

790

:

You're looking at how drawn am I

to this person on all levels, okay?

791

:

And he really recommends actually

aiming for people who you are drawn to,

792

:

regardless of what society says about

them, your attractive, attraction to

793

:

them is between a four and a seven.

794

:

Josh: Wait, what?

795

:

Hold up.

796

:

So, a couple of things here.

797

:

Number one, so we're separating

out, this isn't like a ten on the

798

:

hot or not whatever online poll.

799

:

This is your personal attraction to them.

800

:

And you're telling me that we

shouldn't go for People who are a

801

:

10 on our own attractiveness scale.

802

:

Jessica: Yes, that's correct.

803

:

Well, um, I mean, you can give it a try.

804

:

Experiment at home.

805

:

Yeah, really.

806

:

Go do research and

development, see how that goes.

807

:

I mean, for a lot of people, they do go

for the, what for them is a 10 out of 10,

808

:

makes their knees weak and everything.

809

:

Ken's point, which I agree with, is

that Oftentimes, it's not just about

810

:

physical attraction or say, pheromones,

it's also about, um, some way that

811

:

they get our attachment system going.

812

:

Um, coming back to intermittent

reinforcement, it's often people who,

813

:

um, There's some sort of intermittent

reinforcement experience where we're

814

:

actually not going to get all the

things that we need from them and we

815

:

kind of pick this up on some level.

816

:

They may be people who remind us of

people from the past and basically they

817

:

just get our nervous system a little

bit activated in addition to attracted.

818

:

Josh: Mm.

819

:

Jessica: And so,

820

:

Josh: So they get our nervous

system activated in what way?

821

:

Say more about that.

822

:

Jessica: Yeah, okay.

823

:

So, you know, these concepts

feel like nesting, um, dolls.

824

:

Yeah, absolutely.

825

:

It's like I want to

explain all the things.

826

:

Yeah.

827

:

Um, okay.

828

:

So, um, You've probably heard the

like kind of pop psychology belief

829

:

that like we're attracted to people

who remind us of our mom or our dad.

830

:

Sure.

831

:

Jessica: Okay.

832

:

So it's kind of along those lines.

833

:

Other people, we, we project onto them.

834

:

Okay.

835

:

They remind us of people from our

past without us even really realizing.

836

:

Okay.

837

:

And so for a lot of people, the 10 out

of 10 is not just a hottie, doesn't just

838

:

fit our like, whatever type we might.

839

:

They often also, um, maybe on a

very sort of unconscious level, um,

840

:

remind us of somebody who we were

very attached to, but maybe didn't

841

:

get all of our needs met by, okay?

842

:

And there's a part of our nervous

system that wants to, uh, correct that.

843

:

Correct that experience, okay?

844

:

So this is referred to

as repetition compulsion.

845

:

Okay.

846

:

If you want to go real Freudian.

847

:

Ooh.

848

:

Ooh.

849

:

Freudian.

850

:

So we're drawn to relationships where

they remind us of past, um, sort of

851

:

unmet needs and we want to fix that.

852

:

On, on an unconscious level.

853

:

So if my dad was distant, I might have

a tendency to be attracted to people

854

:

who are a little aloof and may not be

that emotionally responsive, accessible,

855

:

responsive, engaged kind of person.

856

:

But my nervous system, uh, gets

really activated around them and

857

:

kind of draws me closer to them

in a way that feels like love.

858

:

Mm-Hmm.

859

:

. Because my first experience of a, um.

860

:

A man that I had deep love for

was one where there was love,

861

:

but also a lot of distance.

862

:

Josh: And so it, it, uh, it can often

feel, we kind of, I think, equate it

863

:

to that experience that we see in the

media and whatever, and like love at

864

:

first sight, like super intense, weak

at the knees, like the kind of romance

865

:

novel, like, ah, kind of experience.

866

:

And, um, what I'm, what I'm getting

and I, kind of what I, I think I've

867

:

seen also in my own life is that is,

it's very, like, almost addicting.

868

:

Jessica: Yeah.

869

:

Josh: It kind of has that, that experience

of, like, almost a compulsion or a, like,

870

:

kind of that intermittent reinforcement,

like, um, we kind of get high off of it

871

:

and we

872

:

Josh: kind of mix up some of those

signals also about what is attraction

873

:

and what is this other unmet need

trying to get expressed or get met.

874

:

Um, that kind of feels very compelling,

but ultimately is very likely to

875

:

be pretty unsatisfying in a long

term relationship and not actually

876

:

really meeting these deeper needs for

connection and intimacy and safety.

877

:

Jessica: Yeah, one of the chapters Logan

has in her book is called F the Spark.

878

:

Josh: I really appreciate

that, that, uh, title.

879

:

Jessica: Yes.

880

:

I know.

881

:

I love that too.

882

:

Yeah.

883

:

And, and the, the sort of idea in there

is in healthy long term relationships,

884

:

oftentimes attraction is something

that deepens over time and it may not

885

:

actually be present like, like that

sort of hot physical attraction that

886

:

you associate with the 10 out of 10.

887

:

That's not necessarily going to be

present right at the beginning when

888

:

you see them on the app, when you

talk to them, um, on the phone, when

889

:

you meet them for the first time.

890

:

Mm hmm.

891

:

Jessica: That sort of thing deepens

as you two create that really

892

:

secure, uh, warm connection.

893

:

I think that's very

surprising for some people.

894

:

Yeah.

895

:

Josh: Very counterintuitive.

896

:

It goes against all of the, the

love stories that we see, or almost

897

:

all the love stories that we see

in media and books and TV and.

898

:

Jessica: Yeah.

899

:

I really want to emphasize here,

because I think it's interesting.

900

:

easy to not hear this

totally, um, correctly.

901

:

We're not saying that you should keep

seeing someone if you are not attracted

902

:

to them or if your attraction to them

is low and just keeps getting lower.

903

:

That is not what we're saying.

904

:

Good.

905

:

Clarification.

906

:

As

907

:

Jessica: good a person as they are,

you do need to be attracted to them

908

:

and, you know, going Noticing your own

attraction, how it is over time, and

909

:

maybe not going for the 10 out of 10.

910

:

Um, and also, you know, just sort

of letting go of, gosh, what does

911

:

society think about this person and

their attractiveness, and noticing

912

:

your own draw to them on multiple

levels, physical, emotional, social.

913

:

spiritual, all of

914

:

Josh: them.

915

:

Yeah.

916

:

And so we're aiming for that

4 to 7 window out of 10.

917

:

Uh, just like you're saying,

we're not saying, Oh, if

918

:

it's a one, just keep going.

919

:

You're going to get the

track to them eventually.

920

:

No, we're not saying that, but, um,

kind of maybe dial it back from the

921

:

most intense 10 out of 10 because

that's going to be cause you problems.

922

:

Yeah.

923

:

Jessica: So, um, there,

there are a few other.

924

:

of these traits that are like easy to

look for but not actually applicable or,

925

:

um, important in long term relationships.

926

:

I want to name from that same study

I mentioned earlier from Samantha

927

:

Joel, um, with the machine learning

models that assess whether specific

928

:

traits in a mate were predictive

of happiness with that mate.

929

:

Mm hmm.

930

:

Uh, first one, race or ethnicity.

931

:

We have religious affiliation.

932

:

Josh: Really?

933

:

Jessica: Yeah.

934

:

Height.

935

:

Occupation.

936

:

Mm hmm.

937

:

Physical attractiveness.

938

:

Mm hmm.

939

:

Previous marital status.

940

:

Mm hmm.

941

:

Josh: Mm

942

:

Jessica: hmm.

943

:

Sexual tastes.

944

:

Josh: Interesting.

945

:

Jessica: And, sorry, last

one, similarity to oneself.

946

:

Josh: Mm hmm.

947

:

So, sexual taste, like, whether

or not they're similar to you or

948

:

indissimilar things, doesn't actually

correlate with, you know, sex.

949

:

Jessica: Right.

950

:

And I imagine, you know, if we

go back to what does matter, you

951

:

know, there's emotional stability,

kindness, loyalty, growth mindset.

952

:

Uh, the growth mindset in

particular, you know, um, Dan

953

:

Savage talks about, um, GGG, right?

954

:

Do you remember what the?

955

:

Josh: Good giving and

956

:

Jessica: Good giving, do I remember?

957

:

Good giving and game.

958

:

You got it.

959

:

So, um, they've got some skill.

960

:

That's a good one, right?

961

:

See, I'm not even remembering.

962

:

I'm like, here's a concept.

963

:

I'm an expert.

964

:

Josh: Uh, Dan Sapp.

965

:

Yeah.

966

:

My takeaway from that, I actually don't

remember exactly what his definition of

967

:

it was, was essentially that are they,

are Uh, kind of generous, uh, in the

968

:

bedroom and are they up for trying things?

969

:

Are they willing to explore

with you and experiment and

970

:

kind of, uh, be in it together?

971

:

Jessica: Um.

972

:

Yes.

973

:

Josh: So I think that's where you're

going with that growth mindset.

974

:

If I,

975

:

Jessica: you've got it.

976

:

Josh: Whether or not we have

the same tastes, are you,

977

:

are you open to exploring?

978

:

Are you open to being kind of experiment?

979

:

Are you interested in, in helping

your partner experience sexual

980

:

satisfaction and joy and happiness?

981

:

Jessica: Absolutely.

982

:

You got it.

983

:

Josh: So what's interesting I think

about this conversation is that this

984

:

list of what to look for in a partner

is also in many ways a really good

985

:

roadmap for how to be a good partner.

986

:

And that one of the, one of the traps

I think we can get into when we are.

987

:

Dating.

988

:

We're kind of serious about looking

for our long term partner is we get

989

:

into this very evaluative checklist

kind of assessing the other person.

990

:

Are they, are they this?

991

:

Are they that?

992

:

Are they that?

993

:

Nope.

994

:

Okay, next.

995

:

You know, and we forget

about how are we showing up?

996

:

Are we showing up in a way

that our, our partner will

997

:

recognize us when they find us?

998

:

Jessica: Yeah.

999

:

Yep.

:

00:49:24,870 --> 00:49:29,130

Josh: Um, and that this isn't a just

about what can I get from this person.

:

00:49:29,350 --> 00:49:29,600

Jessica: Yeah.

:

00:49:29,650 --> 00:49:34,800

Josh: Um, in the words of my friend and,

and coach Zoe Tobey, uh, what can I give?

:

00:49:34,960 --> 00:49:35,600

Mm hmm.

:

00:49:35,600 --> 00:49:38,490

Josh: That, that kind of switching from

that what can I get, what can I get,

:

00:49:38,490 --> 00:49:40,230

what can I get to, what can I give?

:

00:49:40,230 --> 00:49:41,280

Who are we together?

:

00:49:41,360 --> 00:49:41,690

Yeah.

:

00:49:41,700 --> 00:49:45,730

Josh: What is, do we have a shared vision

for partnership, for our relationship, for

:

00:49:45,730 --> 00:49:47,320

the kind of life we want to have together?

:

00:49:47,490 --> 00:49:51,240

Jessica: Yeah, I'm so glad you're pointing

that out because I think that is kind of

:

00:49:51,240 --> 00:49:55,340

the downside of knowing all these things

is you can, you can go into, I see a

:

00:49:55,340 --> 00:49:56,570

lot of my clients struggling with this.

:

00:49:56,580 --> 00:49:59,950

They'll go into dates and it's like,

I didn't really feel a connection.

:

00:49:59,990 --> 00:50:03,790

And like, I felt like, it just

sort of felt kind of businessy

:

00:50:03,790 --> 00:50:05,070

or formal or something.

:

00:50:05,730 --> 00:50:06,020

And

:

00:50:06,250 --> 00:50:08,640

Josh: it's like, yeah, and I

was sitting there assessing

:

00:50:08,640 --> 00:50:09,405

them on all these questions.

:

00:50:09,565 --> 00:50:10,295

Criteria.

:

00:50:10,355 --> 00:50:10,745

Jessica: Right.

:

00:50:10,755 --> 00:50:11,715

Josh: And I wasn't present.

:

00:50:11,715 --> 00:50:13,115

So it's of course you weren't connected.

:

00:50:13,125 --> 00:50:13,145

Yeah.

:

00:50:13,155 --> 00:50:14,615

Like you weren't, you weren't there.

:

00:50:14,615 --> 00:50:17,865

You weren't showing up and being

interested in doing the things that

:

00:50:17,865 --> 00:50:20,405

would naturally create a connection.

:

00:50:20,425 --> 00:50:20,855

Jessica: Yeah.

:

00:50:20,855 --> 00:50:20,895

Josh: Yeah.

:

00:50:20,895 --> 00:50:25,775

And so it's such a, yeah, we can, we can

so miss the opportunities in that way.

:

00:50:25,775 --> 00:50:26,035

Yeah.

:

00:50:26,315 --> 00:50:26,505

Jessica: Yeah.

:

00:50:26,505 --> 00:50:30,965

And I think that goes back to

really kind of like settling into

:

00:50:30,965 --> 00:50:33,765

the truth of like really dating

for a long term relationship.

:

00:50:33,785 --> 00:50:34,855

It takes time.

:

00:50:35,005 --> 00:50:35,325

Right.

:

00:50:35,385 --> 00:50:36,915

So allowing.

:

00:50:37,310 --> 00:50:41,750

Um, allowing you and the other

person to take that time, right?

:

00:50:41,750 --> 00:50:45,040

And going into a date, yes, I

want to be aware of things that,

:

00:50:45,190 --> 00:50:46,630

that they might be showing me.

:

00:50:47,260 --> 00:50:51,690

And like, let your evaluative brain know

we're going to take the time needed to

:

00:50:51,690 --> 00:50:53,190

really gather the information we need.

:

00:50:53,190 --> 00:50:55,100

We don't have to do it within one date.

:

00:50:55,880 --> 00:51:00,270

Um, and I think that can really bring

in more of that sense of ease and like,

:

00:51:00,360 --> 00:51:05,430

can we just be together and see what's

possible when we're more present?

:

00:51:05,680 --> 00:51:06,020

Josh: Yeah.

:

00:51:07,000 --> 00:51:07,190

Yeah.

:

00:51:07,190 --> 00:51:07,660

I love that.

:

00:51:08,875 --> 00:51:14,585

Okay, I, uh, so that, we've just talked

about how, what does science have to say

:

00:51:14,585 --> 00:51:18,415

about what makes a good partner in a lot

of wonderful depth here, going in all

:

00:51:18,415 --> 00:51:20,745

kinds of wonderfully nuanced rabbit holes.

:

00:51:21,255 --> 00:51:25,115

Um, so let's go into the second question

here, which is how do I clarify?

:

00:51:26,525 --> 00:51:27,255

Jessica: Yes.

:

00:51:28,235 --> 00:51:33,405

Yeah, because, uh, research is

research, and you are not a research

:

00:51:33,405 --> 00:51:34,815

study, you are an individual.

:

00:51:35,485 --> 00:51:41,955

And so, um, the tool that we

like to use on our team, uh,

:

00:51:42,205 --> 00:51:44,585

is, there's two tools actually.

:

00:51:44,595 --> 00:51:46,835

One is a relationship inventory.

:

00:51:47,530 --> 00:51:48,040

Okay.

:

00:51:48,660 --> 00:51:56,880

And this is where we are inventorying

in a, uh, spreadsheet past relationships

:

00:51:56,940 --> 00:52:01,690

and all sorts of things about those

relationships, uh, including what

:

00:52:01,730 --> 00:52:03,145

it taught us about what we do.

:

00:52:03,485 --> 00:52:05,735

Need or don't need in a relationship.

:

00:52:06,075 --> 00:52:06,305

Okay.

:

00:52:06,305 --> 00:52:09,875

So that's number one, looking at

the past to gain some insight.

:

00:52:11,305 --> 00:52:16,215

And then number two is something

called an ideal mate exercise.

:

00:52:16,795 --> 00:52:20,935

This I got from fellow therapist and

dating coach Pella Schaefer Weissman,

:

00:52:20,935 --> 00:52:24,885

and it's adapted from a book by

David Steele called Conscious Dating.

:

00:52:25,445 --> 00:52:29,745

And basically it's a three tiered

list where you write out everything

:

00:52:29,755 --> 00:52:34,135

that you that you are looking for

in a mate, and then you prioritize,

:

00:52:34,655 --> 00:52:36,675

uh, all of those different things.

:

00:52:38,465 --> 00:52:40,575

Um, yeah.

:

00:52:40,575 --> 00:52:42,545

So those are our two main tools.

:

00:52:42,785 --> 00:52:43,115

Josh: Okay.

:

00:52:43,345 --> 00:52:45,385

Are these tools that we can

make available to folks?

:

00:52:45,415 --> 00:52:45,865

Jessica: They are.

:

00:52:45,945 --> 00:52:46,515

Josh: On the pod?

:

00:52:46,575 --> 00:52:47,085

Jessica: Yeah.

:

00:52:47,195 --> 00:52:47,785

On the pod.

:

00:52:49,585 --> 00:52:50,665

Yeah, we'll definitely share those.

:

00:52:51,145 --> 00:52:52,835

Take a look in the show notes.

:

00:52:53,255 --> 00:52:58,935

Josh: And is there any, uh, guidance or,

you Kind of main takeaways from those

:

00:52:58,935 --> 00:53:00,655

things that we can share with folks?

:

00:53:01,225 --> 00:53:03,555

Jessica: Yeah, well, we'll talk

a little bit more about the ideal

:

00:53:03,555 --> 00:53:04,885

mate exercise in a little bit.

:

00:53:04,945 --> 00:53:08,555

Um, one thing I'll just say about the

relationship inventory, the point of

:

00:53:08,555 --> 00:53:10,865

that one is to really assess patterns.

:

00:53:11,405 --> 00:53:16,485

So, part of what we actually have people

do is, uh, we have them complete it

:

00:53:16,785 --> 00:53:21,370

such that they're completing it, um,

not By looking at one relationship at

:

00:53:21,370 --> 00:53:25,680

a time, but by looking at one dimension

of all their relationships at a time.

:

00:53:25,960 --> 00:53:30,930

So for example, um, you

know, attachment style.

:

00:53:31,590 --> 00:53:34,340

Okay, so if they go through,

they've got a bunch of relationships

:

00:53:34,340 --> 00:53:38,070

they're inventorying, they're

looking at the attachment style,

:

00:53:38,070 --> 00:53:41,660

writing down the attachment style

of each partner one at a time.

:

00:53:41,830 --> 00:53:42,070

Okay.

:

00:53:42,110 --> 00:53:45,010

So that they can really see the

pattern over time if there is one.

:

00:53:45,120 --> 00:53:45,420

Okay.

:

00:53:45,580 --> 00:53:46,050

Okay.

:

00:53:46,500 --> 00:53:47,260

So that's number one.

:

00:53:47,815 --> 00:53:51,225

Number two, I think this is a really

great way to look in particular

:

00:53:51,225 --> 00:53:55,215

for what we might refer to as

like your relationship kryptonite.

:

00:53:56,015 --> 00:54:01,835

So if you start to see that you

have like a soft spot for say, I

:

00:54:01,835 --> 00:54:08,985

don't know, creative souls who also

have, uh, untreated mental illness.

:

00:54:09,250 --> 00:54:13,240

And an avoidant attachment style,

therefore never commit to you.

:

00:54:13,240 --> 00:54:15,780

Um, that's some good information.

:

00:54:15,890 --> 00:54:16,140

Yeah.

:

00:54:16,170 --> 00:54:16,510

Right?

:

00:54:16,510 --> 00:54:19,400

So, we all have kind of

those, those soft spots.

:

00:54:19,400 --> 00:54:23,630

And, um, I think that only by looking

back and really assessing things

:

00:54:23,630 --> 00:54:25,390

over time can we start to see them.

:

00:54:26,450 --> 00:54:30,120

Josh: That's, that's really interesting

because I, you know, as we were saying,

:

00:54:30,120 --> 00:54:33,280

we can talk about the research and

all these things all day, and then

:

00:54:33,280 --> 00:54:36,560

there are different things for each

of us that are those little points.

:

00:54:36,810 --> 00:54:41,410

Points where we get hooked in by an

old pattern, for example, like what

:

00:54:41,410 --> 00:54:46,250

you're saying, and having some way

to look back in our own lives and

:

00:54:46,250 --> 00:54:48,640

see, oh, this is what it is for me.

:

00:54:49,120 --> 00:54:50,360

This is how it shows up for me.

:

00:54:50,360 --> 00:54:51,980

This is what I need to be aware of.

:

00:54:52,310 --> 00:54:54,630

Which is not going to be relevant

for everybody else, but it's super

:

00:54:54,630 --> 00:54:56,090

important for you to know for yourself.

:

00:54:56,150 --> 00:54:56,700

Jessica: Absolutely.

:

00:54:56,700 --> 00:54:57,740

Mm hmm.

:

00:54:58,680 --> 00:54:59,130

Yeah.

:

00:54:59,480 --> 00:55:02,970

The other resource that I really love

for this is Ken Page's book, Deeper

:

00:55:02,970 --> 00:55:04,390

Dating, which I mentioned earlier.

:

00:55:04,400 --> 00:55:08,030

There's a bunch of exercises in

there to help you discover what

:

00:55:08,030 --> 00:55:09,820

he refers to as your core gifts.

:

00:55:10,350 --> 00:55:14,700

And his whole premise is that we

all have gifts and when we end

:

00:55:14,700 --> 00:55:18,770

up being chronically single or in

relationships that are characterized

:

00:55:18,800 --> 00:55:23,860

by that kind of deprivational

quality, oftentimes we are not finding

:

00:55:23,860 --> 00:55:25,530

people who can honor our gifts.

:

00:55:26,340 --> 00:55:32,210

So an example of this would be, uh, let's

say, Uh, your core gift is a deep sense

:

00:55:32,220 --> 00:55:37,010

of kindness and, uh, you have a big heart.

:

00:55:37,710 --> 00:55:42,040

You may have a tendency, if you're, if

you're not able to really learn how to

:

00:55:43,050 --> 00:55:47,380

honor that gift within yourself and choose

people who honor it, you may attract

:

00:55:47,410 --> 00:55:50,295

people who, um, are harsh with you.

:

00:55:50,915 --> 00:55:57,105

And who are, um, yeah, not, not

respectful of the fact that you,

:

00:55:57,145 --> 00:55:58,415

you have a big sensitive heart.

:

00:56:02,495 --> 00:56:07,675

So that would be the, the main thing is

to do a little bit of that work on paper,

:

00:56:07,685 --> 00:56:09,955

perhaps with a friend or a professional.

:

00:56:10,380 --> 00:56:14,330

To really sense, uh, what are the things

I've learned from my past relationships

:

00:56:15,070 --> 00:56:19,920

and to get on paper what are all the

things I think I'm looking for in a mate.

:

00:56:22,350 --> 00:56:26,360

Josh: I imagine, actually don't know if

you do this with any of, uh, the folks

:

00:56:26,490 --> 00:56:32,280

you work with, but I imagine it may also

be useful in there to understand what

:

00:56:32,290 --> 00:56:37,535

are those kind of, uh, On paper things

like that I think I should be looking for

:

00:56:37,615 --> 00:56:40,645

that we're talking about earlier, these

qualities that don't actually correlate.

:

00:56:41,225 --> 00:56:42,245

What are those for you?

:

00:56:42,255 --> 00:56:47,685

Like are you really set on having a

partner who is, you know, also really

:

00:56:47,695 --> 00:56:54,195

into outdoorsy stuff for instance, or a

partner who is a certain height, um, and

:

00:56:54,295 --> 00:56:58,265

really kind of asking yourself, actually

one of our clinicians mentioned this to me

:

00:56:58,265 --> 00:57:02,745

that she also often asks people, will this

impact the quality of your relationship?

:

00:57:02,805 --> 00:57:03,095

Jessica: Yeah.

:

00:57:04,165 --> 00:57:08,075

Josh: And really, like, really looking

at that, right, it's like, really, will

:

00:57:08,075 --> 00:57:12,405

this really impact the quality of a

relationship if you're not both outdoorsy

:

00:57:12,425 --> 00:57:17,995

or you're not both, you know, therapists,

for instance, or you're not both, uh,

:

00:57:19,215 --> 00:57:21,785

really into gaming, whatever it might be.

:

00:57:22,720 --> 00:57:26,710

Jessica: Yeah, one of the things I really

appreciated that Logan talks about with

:

00:57:26,710 --> 00:57:31,420

the common interests piece that's a little

bit nuanced is you can absolutely have

:

00:57:31,420 --> 00:57:35,620

different interests so long as you manage

that in a way that doesn't negatively

:

00:57:35,630 --> 00:57:39,640

impact, uh, your quality time together.

:

00:57:40,960 --> 00:57:42,500

in either direction, right?

:

00:57:42,500 --> 00:57:46,300

Like if you, you want to give your

partner freedom to do the things that

:

00:57:46,300 --> 00:57:50,770

they love if you don't love them,

and they also need to be, you know,

:

00:57:50,860 --> 00:57:55,010

spending enough time with you to, to

really continue to deepen that bond.

:

00:57:55,170 --> 00:57:55,540

Right.

:

00:57:57,890 --> 00:58:02,450

Josh: The other thing that I've found

helpful in the past, and this also

:

00:58:02,470 --> 00:58:06,350

comes from Zoe Tobey, who I mentioned

earlier, He talks about creating an

:

00:58:06,350 --> 00:58:11,480

authentic relationship vision that

is all about how are we together.

:

00:58:12,030 --> 00:58:13,960

Talking a little bit more about

what we were saying earlier.

:

00:58:14,590 --> 00:58:15,770

What is the relationship?

:

00:58:16,190 --> 00:58:18,650

What is that kind of meeting

of the two of you together?

:

00:58:18,860 --> 00:58:24,380

It's like, uh, and so shifting

from things like, you know,

:

00:58:24,520 --> 00:58:26,710

they think the way that I do to.

:

00:58:27,040 --> 00:58:28,850

We communicate openly and lovingly.

:

00:58:29,020 --> 00:58:29,420

Jessica: Yes.

:

00:58:29,520 --> 00:58:34,750

Josh: That kind of, that's what we're,

we're attuning to, uh, or like we're,

:

00:58:34,950 --> 00:58:36,730

you know, we love wholeheartedly.

:

00:58:37,110 --> 00:58:37,710

Like, what

:

00:58:37,710 --> 00:58:43,240

Josh: are the qualities of how we are

together that I want in a relationship?

:

00:58:43,260 --> 00:58:43,770

Mm hmm.

:

00:58:44,350 --> 00:58:48,380

Josh: that will then help me navigate as

I'm exploring relationships with people.

:

00:58:49,650 --> 00:58:50,880

Is my vision present here?

:

00:58:51,750 --> 00:58:52,900

Do we have a shared vision?

:

00:58:53,060 --> 00:58:56,660

Are we both really interested in, you

know, helping each other fulfill our

:

00:58:56,660 --> 00:58:59,260

purpose as part of our shared vision?

:

00:58:59,370 --> 00:59:00,620

Jessica: Yeah, absolutely.

:

00:59:00,660 --> 00:59:01,390

I love that.

:

00:59:02,040 --> 00:59:07,510

There's an exercise that I like to do with

a lot of clients where we actually have

:

00:59:07,510 --> 00:59:10,000

them speak to their future partner, right?

:

00:59:10,000 --> 00:59:10,880

So I'm a drama therapist.

:

00:59:10,880 --> 00:59:17,040

I like to use role play and sort of

imaginal work and have a practice

:

00:59:17,050 --> 00:59:20,820

of Speaking to that future partner

and kind of feeling the energy of

:

00:59:20,840 --> 00:59:22,700

their rapport and of their dynamic.

:

00:59:22,710 --> 00:59:22,920

Mm.

:

00:59:23,260 --> 00:59:27,930

Jessica: Um, and I find that really

powerful, uh, because it, it can be,

:

00:59:27,930 --> 00:59:32,980

you know, we can shift out of the like

cognitive, cognitive analysis, this

:

00:59:32,990 --> 00:59:37,970

trait, this trait, this trait, and

shift into like experiencing what we

:

00:59:37,970 --> 00:59:42,020

want to feel potentially or what we

will feel, feel with that part, person.

:

00:59:43,320 --> 00:59:47,480

Josh: That is so interesting

because it's very much like what I

:

00:59:47,610 --> 00:59:49,200

remember doing when I was younger.

:

00:59:49,585 --> 00:59:50,975

Looking at online dating profiles.

:

00:59:51,045 --> 00:59:51,655

Mm hmm.

:

00:59:51,855 --> 00:59:56,765

Josh: That I got to a point, after doing

more of the kind of looking for the

:

00:59:56,765 --> 01:00:02,365

check boxes and I had whatever my things

were, and, um, not having great success

:

01:00:02,365 --> 01:00:04,995

with that, having some relationships

that didn't go the way I wanted them

:

01:00:04,995 --> 01:00:09,535

to, and realizing the more that I

was tuning into what's the energy of,

:

01:00:09,535 --> 01:00:11,445

of

:

01:00:11,625 --> 01:00:13,525

Josh: what's the energy I get

from reading this profile.

:

01:00:13,895 --> 01:00:18,085

The experience I have was far more

reliable for me in finding people

:

01:00:18,085 --> 01:00:20,295

who at least were a good possibility

:

01:00:20,385 --> 01:00:20,555

for

:

01:00:20,605 --> 01:00:21,275

Josh: connection.

:

01:00:21,915 --> 01:00:25,285

And then again leaning more into,

yeah, what is that experience

:

01:00:25,285 --> 01:00:26,535

of how we are together?

:

01:00:27,335 --> 01:00:33,415

and Um, yeah, I just, I'm appreciating

that and appreciating how important

:

01:00:33,435 --> 01:00:37,645

that is to be able to kind of

tune into that energy without

:

01:00:37,645 --> 01:00:38,945

getting too woo woo about it.

:

01:00:38,955 --> 01:00:40,925

But like, just like,

what's the experience like?

:

01:00:40,955 --> 01:00:41,345

Jessica: Yeah.

:

01:00:41,505 --> 01:00:46,535

Josh: What is it that I am going to

feel, I am going to feel recognized,

:

01:00:46,535 --> 01:00:50,845

I'm going to feel understood, I'm

going to feel loved, deeply loved, uh,

:

01:00:51,095 --> 01:00:54,885

feel like this person cares, feel like

there's this quality of playfulness,

:

01:00:54,895 --> 01:00:56,805

of, of connection that we're both.

:

01:00:57,340 --> 01:01:04,880

leaning in or both engaged, uh, that kind

of tunes our radar on a different way

:

01:01:04,880 --> 01:01:07,710

than when we're on that like checkbox

:

01:01:07,710 --> 01:01:07,770

Jessica: evaluative.

:

01:01:07,770 --> 01:01:08,340

Yeah.

:

01:01:08,480 --> 01:01:09,020

Josh: Kind of approach.

:

01:01:09,110 --> 01:01:10,010

Jessica: Absolutely.

:

01:01:10,180 --> 01:01:11,750

I love, I love that you did that.

:

01:01:13,750 --> 01:01:14,140

Josh: Okay.

:

01:01:14,360 --> 01:01:18,705

So, Anything else that you'd

want to say about how to clarify

:

01:01:18,705 --> 01:01:20,545

what, what I need in a partner?

:

01:01:22,185 --> 01:01:26,915

Jessica: I mean, I think maybe

the last thought here is we aren't

:

01:01:27,135 --> 01:01:29,065

always great at knowing what we need.

:

01:01:29,335 --> 01:01:29,935

Mm hmm.

:

01:01:30,445 --> 01:01:38,565

Jessica: We all have blind spots and

your loved ones may be able to see

:

01:01:38,615 --> 01:01:39,930

some things that you're not seeing.

:

01:01:42,010 --> 01:01:44,370

I want to caveat this,

some of your loved ones.

:

01:01:48,670 --> 01:01:55,110

You really want to choose people who

you trust and who you, you really

:

01:01:55,110 --> 01:02:00,040

trust their judgment and their

sense of you and maybe ask, what

:

01:02:00,040 --> 01:02:01,680

do you think I need in a partner?

:

01:02:04,880 --> 01:02:10,420

Josh: That is such a sweet and vulnerable

question because it really is, you're,

:

01:02:10,450 --> 01:02:12,440

you're kind of opening yourself up to.

:

01:02:15,180 --> 01:02:18,280

Very authentic kind of

feedback and support.

:

01:02:18,280 --> 01:02:21,840

What a sweet way to invite

in support from your friends.

:

01:02:22,070 --> 01:02:25,170

It's not just like, help me

swipe on my profile, or help

:

01:02:25,170 --> 01:02:26,240

me write my profile better.

:

01:02:26,240 --> 01:02:27,850

It's like, what do you

think I need in a partner?

:

01:02:28,820 --> 01:02:29,455

I really appreciate that.

:

01:02:29,775 --> 01:02:30,555

Be good for me.

:

01:02:31,325 --> 01:02:31,775

I love that.

:

01:02:32,715 --> 01:02:37,835

The other thought I was just having

about all of this is, uh, give

:

01:02:37,835 --> 01:02:40,215

yourself permission to experiment.

:

01:02:40,335 --> 01:02:41,225

Mmm.

:

01:02:41,775 --> 01:02:46,935

Josh: That, and it's, it can be a hard

thing to do, I think, especially when

:

01:02:46,935 --> 01:02:51,358

we're dating kind of into our thirties and

later in life, and it feels like there's,

:

01:02:51,358 --> 01:02:55,875

there's, there's Sometimes additional

pressure on timeline and, um, I've gotta,

:

01:02:55,935 --> 01:02:59,265

you know, gotta get the partner in order

so I can have the kids on the time and,

:

01:02:59,895 --> 01:03:05,035

but I respect that it can be a very hard

thing to do, but at the same time, we

:

01:03:05,035 --> 01:03:07,195

learn so much about what we really need.

:

01:03:08,130 --> 01:03:09,660

out of our experiences.

:

01:03:09,770 --> 01:03:10,040

Yeah.

:

01:03:10,040 --> 01:03:10,160

And

:

01:03:10,160 --> 01:03:14,040

Josh: we can have the best thoughts

about what we think we need and then

:

01:03:14,040 --> 01:03:18,760

we, the only way to kind of verify

is to go out and experience and go

:

01:03:18,760 --> 01:03:21,270

on dates and have some relationships.

:

01:03:21,340 --> 01:03:25,710

And, uh, out of that, you're

really going to see, oh, no, this.

:

01:03:26,365 --> 01:03:27,475

This is what's really important.

:

01:03:27,905 --> 01:03:29,655

Jessica: Such a great, such a great point.

:

01:03:30,025 --> 01:03:33,925

And to that point, you know, we have

a lot of clients who come to us who

:

01:03:33,935 --> 01:03:38,905

don't have a lot of relationship

experience and that this exercise of,

:

01:03:38,955 --> 01:03:43,105

of creating an ideal mate list and

whatnot is very hard for that reason.

:

01:03:43,465 --> 01:03:46,395

And I think going for the

experience is, is really important.

:

01:03:46,435 --> 01:03:48,175

And also, consider,

:

01:03:50,520 --> 01:03:51,050

Oh.

:

01:03:51,720 --> 01:03:52,170

Jessica: Yeah.

:

01:03:52,200 --> 01:03:52,740

Some more.

:

01:03:53,080 --> 01:03:57,720

Well, you know, we all, we, all of

us have relationships, whether or not

:

01:03:57,720 --> 01:03:59,200

we've, we have a romantic history.

:

01:03:59,660 --> 01:04:02,810

And you've probably learned a lot about

yourself and about what you need in

:

01:04:02,810 --> 01:04:05,780

relationships through your friendships,

through your family relationships,

:

01:04:05,780 --> 01:04:06,500

through your, through your work.

:

01:04:06,660 --> 01:04:08,010

Relationships with coworkers.

:

01:04:09,080 --> 01:04:12,580

So if you don't have a ton of

relationship experience, have no fear.

:

01:04:13,120 --> 01:04:17,240

Um, you probably know a fair amount

about yourself already just from

:

01:04:17,870 --> 01:04:19,470

looking at those relationships.

:

01:04:20,040 --> 01:04:20,430

Josh: Hmm.

:

01:04:21,390 --> 01:04:23,360

That's such a great suggestion.

:

01:04:23,460 --> 01:04:24,440

Great way to orient.

:

01:04:25,480 --> 01:04:28,620

Use all of your life

experience to learn and grow.

:

01:04:35,220 --> 01:04:41,550

Okay, well then, uh, maybe we'll round

it out here with how do I clarify

:

01:04:41,550 --> 01:04:43,120

what I need versus what I want?

:

01:04:45,230 --> 01:04:46,380

Jessica: Such a good question.

:

01:04:47,500 --> 01:04:48,520

And I will tell you.

:

01:04:48,529 --> 01:04:52,785

Uh, Transcribed Basically, everyone we

work with needs, needs help with this.

:

01:04:53,255 --> 01:04:53,595

Yeah.

:

01:04:54,415 --> 01:05:00,565

So, uh, in the Ideal Mate

exercise, the exercise is basically

:

01:05:00,565 --> 01:05:02,595

like you write your full list.

:

01:05:02,615 --> 01:05:05,095

These are all the things I

am looking for in a partner.

:

01:05:05,525 --> 01:05:07,565

And then you split them into three lists.

:

01:05:07,565 --> 01:05:09,235

The first one is requirements.

:

01:05:09,615 --> 01:05:11,515

So the traits you cannot live without.

:

01:05:12,140 --> 01:05:13,940

The second is strong desires.

:

01:05:14,330 --> 01:05:18,670

So your relationship would survive with

your partner if they didn't have these,

:

01:05:19,130 --> 01:05:21,170

but it might not necessarily thrive.

:

01:05:21,950 --> 01:05:24,800

I like to think of this one as

like, what are the things I'd be

:

01:05:24,800 --> 01:05:26,150

willing to go to therapy over?

:

01:05:26,790 --> 01:05:27,160

Hmm.

:

01:05:27,420 --> 01:05:27,850

Interesting.

:

01:05:27,980 --> 01:05:28,160

Okay.

:

01:05:29,360 --> 01:05:32,150

Jessica: And the third list is wants.

:

01:05:32,370 --> 01:05:36,950

So the icing on the cake, the relationship

can survive and even thrive without these.

:

01:05:38,460 --> 01:05:41,310

Josh: Can you give me some examples

of what types of things might,

:

01:05:41,360 --> 01:05:43,600

I mean, I guess it's probably

different for each person, but,

:

01:05:43,930 --> 01:05:45,660

uh, what might fall into these?

:

01:05:45,930 --> 01:05:46,570

Jessica: Absolutely.

:

01:05:46,850 --> 01:05:51,180

Well, I would suggest placing all of the

research based traits mentioned earlier

:

01:05:51,180 --> 01:05:54,300

on the list in your requirements section.

:

01:05:55,910 --> 01:05:58,950

And within that, because you've done

the relationship inventory and thought

:

01:05:58,960 --> 01:06:05,250

a few things through, placing like your

specific versions of those things, right?

:

01:06:05,250 --> 01:06:07,720

So remember, I mentioned

earlier, kryptonite, if you

:

01:06:07,730 --> 01:06:09,100

have that soft spot for that.

:

01:06:09,460 --> 01:06:13,660

sensitive creative souls who

can't commit and have untreated

:

01:06:13,660 --> 01:06:15,390

mental illness, write that down.

:

01:06:15,990 --> 01:06:21,720

And then strong desires, an

example of a strong desire.

:

01:06:21,720 --> 01:06:23,820

I mean, again, it really does vary.

:

01:06:23,880 --> 01:06:24,110

Josh: Yeah.

:

01:06:24,600 --> 01:06:25,300

Jessica: Um.

:

01:06:26,940 --> 01:06:30,250

Josh: Well, I'm just thinking about

For myself when I did my own version of

:

01:06:30,250 --> 01:06:32,300

this when I was looking for my partner.

:

01:06:32,510 --> 01:06:33,240

When I was looking for you.

:

01:06:33,820 --> 01:06:38,000

Um, that you know like smoking.

:

01:06:38,660 --> 01:06:39,210

Smoking was a

:

01:06:39,210 --> 01:06:40,020

Josh: deal breaker for me.

:

01:06:40,580 --> 01:06:44,640

And it isn't for everybody obviously like

that's not, it's very personal to me but

:

01:06:45,170 --> 01:06:52,310

I, as a person who is very sensitive to

smells, um, it, it was just so, I knew

:

01:06:52,310 --> 01:06:55,820

it was going to be so hard on my system

to be around somebody who was, was a

:

01:06:55,820 --> 01:06:59,900

cigarette smoker, that, that, that was

just a, that was a deal breaker for me.

:

01:07:00,450 --> 01:07:04,870

Um, and I think probably

strong desire for me was.

:

01:07:07,125 --> 01:07:09,375

I actually haven't thought about

it in this framework before.

:

01:07:09,985 --> 01:07:15,075

Um, well, maybe, um, strong

desire might have been profession.

:

01:07:15,135 --> 01:07:22,325

That someone who is in a helping

profession, who's, um, like engaged in

:

01:07:22,325 --> 01:07:23,935

work that's really meaningful to them.

:

01:07:24,745 --> 01:07:30,055

Um, I could have been okay if they

were, maybe there's really two

:

01:07:30,055 --> 01:07:31,305

separate things in there, right?

:

01:07:31,315 --> 01:07:34,215

Helping profession,

engaged in meaningful work.

:

01:07:34,335 --> 01:07:34,685

Mm hmm.

:

01:07:34,904 --> 01:07:35,425

Josh: Um, yeah.

:

01:07:35,950 --> 01:07:41,010

Helping profession, that's actually,

it's not a deal breaker, right?

:

01:07:41,090 --> 01:07:45,690

I could have been with somebody

who, uh, was, you know, a

:

01:07:45,690 --> 01:07:46,980

mathematician or something.

:

01:07:47,500 --> 01:07:49,430

And for all those mathematicians

out there, I'm not saying you're not

:

01:07:49,430 --> 01:07:51,170

helping people, just to be clear.

:

01:07:51,820 --> 01:07:57,760

Um, but you know, the more like kind

of therapist, coach, teacher, more like

:

01:07:57,770 --> 01:08:03,350

kind of that social end of the helping

spectrum, um, and it just happens to be a

:

01:08:03,350 --> 01:08:05,290

nice bonus that I'm with somebody who is.

:

01:08:05,560 --> 01:08:05,810

Jessica: Right.

:

01:08:05,830 --> 01:08:06,880

Josh: Oriented in that way.

:

01:08:07,350 --> 01:08:10,320

Um, whereas engaged in meaningful

work, that was probably closer

:

01:08:10,320 --> 01:08:11,440

to a deal breaker for me.

:

01:08:11,510 --> 01:08:12,110

Hmm.

:

01:08:12,870 --> 01:08:15,350

Josh: I think maybe the, the most

deal breaker version of it was,

:

01:08:15,380 --> 01:08:19,035

you know, They have to at least be

interested in finding meaningful work,

:

01:08:19,064 --> 01:08:20,915

even if they haven't found it yet.

:

01:08:20,925 --> 01:08:24,325

They're, they're on the search for work

that's really going to fill them up.

:

01:08:24,395 --> 01:08:24,854

Mm hmm.

:

01:08:25,305 --> 01:08:29,314

Josh: Um, but really I was, I was

very much hoping for a partner who

:

01:08:29,375 --> 01:08:35,555

loves what they do and, uh, is engaged

in doing work that matters to them.

:

01:08:35,625 --> 01:08:36,035

Jessica: Mm hmm.

:

01:08:36,795 --> 01:08:37,234

Yeah.

:

01:08:37,535 --> 01:08:40,955

Ultimately with this exercise,

what we want to end up with is

:

01:08:41,024 --> 01:08:44,665

a, a list that clarifies for us.

:

01:08:45,279 --> 01:08:47,620

You know, what should I be looking

at to determine whether or not to

:

01:08:47,620 --> 01:08:49,520

go on another date with this person?

:

01:08:49,970 --> 01:08:51,840

And generally, it's the requirements list.

:

01:08:51,840 --> 01:08:56,330

Do I have enough evidence to

tell me that they're, um, meeting

:

01:08:56,460 --> 01:08:58,729

those deal breakers, essentially?

:

01:08:58,859 --> 01:08:59,120

Right.

:

01:09:00,399 --> 01:09:02,660

Josh: That is a great, great point.

:

01:09:03,180 --> 01:09:03,620

Right.

:

01:09:04,720 --> 01:09:10,050

Yeah, I just, I'm really appreciating

that because that's all we need.

:

01:09:10,069 --> 01:09:12,300

It's another way of saying

that maybe it's like, is this

:

01:09:12,300 --> 01:09:13,770

a possibility worth exploring?

:

01:09:13,850 --> 01:09:14,359

Jessica: Yes.

:

01:09:14,649 --> 01:09:16,920

Josh: Because as you were saying

earlier, we don't need to know.

:

01:09:16,920 --> 01:09:20,090

In fact, it would be impossible to

know from one date or a couple of

:

01:09:20,090 --> 01:09:21,850

dates, is this your life partner?

:

01:09:22,529 --> 01:09:26,595

Um, all we can really answer is, Is

this a possibility worth exploring?

:

01:09:27,125 --> 01:09:30,395

Is this something that we

want to keep going and see?

:

01:09:30,495 --> 01:09:33,135

See what develops here, see

what our relationship is like.

:

01:09:33,665 --> 01:09:40,015

And, uh, if you know right off the bat,

I want kids, this person doesn't want

:

01:09:40,015 --> 01:09:42,625

kids, Kids is a deal breaker for me.

:

01:09:42,875 --> 01:09:44,375

That's not a possibility worth exploring.

:

01:09:44,385 --> 01:09:47,675

They may be a wonderful human,

but they're not your life partner.

:

01:09:49,055 --> 01:09:49,665

Jessica: Absolutely.

:

01:09:50,045 --> 01:09:55,045

Um, another thing I really love that Logan

Urie talks about in her book is a lot of

:

01:09:55,045 --> 01:10:01,125

times people will put, for example, um,

has traveled to over 10 countries or is

:

01:10:01,125 --> 01:10:04,695

this particular religion, um, et cetera.

:

01:10:05,225 --> 01:10:10,960

And, um, Ultimately, like, it's,

it's easier to identify, like,

:

01:10:10,960 --> 01:10:12,580

number of stamps in a passport.

:

01:10:12,770 --> 01:10:16,580

It's a little harder to identify

adventurous nature, right?

:

01:10:16,580 --> 01:10:19,450

And so we want to kind of, like,

tune into if we have things that

:

01:10:19,450 --> 01:10:24,630

are maybe identifiable within a

conversation or on, on a online

:

01:10:24,630 --> 01:10:28,100

dating profile, what is the quality

you're looking for underneath that?

:

01:10:28,100 --> 01:10:28,670

Josh: Mm.

:

01:10:28,910 --> 01:10:29,390

Interesting.

:

01:10:30,930 --> 01:10:36,800

Jessica: So for the wants, I do want to

say that I recommend for the wants section

:

01:10:36,950 --> 01:10:42,309

putting all of the irrelevant traits

that we talked about earlier, right?

:

01:10:43,180 --> 01:10:47,350

So these are the easily observable

ones, like, I'll give you an

:

01:10:47,350 --> 01:10:49,945

example Like a good wants list.

:

01:10:50,615 --> 01:10:51,555

5'10 or above.

:

01:10:51,555 --> 01:10:53,075

I

:

01:10:53,075 --> 01:10:53,735

Jessica: see that one a lot.

:

01:10:54,035 --> 01:10:54,865

Loves to dance.

:

01:10:56,275 --> 01:10:58,305

A chill personality, like me.

:

01:10:59,955 --> 01:11:01,415

Makes at least X.

:

01:11:03,555 --> 01:11:04,725

Not an accountant.

:

01:11:04,785 --> 01:11:05,525

I've seen that one.

:

01:11:05,865 --> 01:11:07,005

I'm sorry accountants out there.

:

01:11:07,015 --> 01:11:08,345

I really appreciate you.

:

01:11:08,455 --> 01:11:09,155

Josh: You do good work.

:

01:11:10,745 --> 01:11:11,675

Jessica: Never married.

:

01:11:12,080 --> 01:11:12,420

Uh huh.

:

01:11:13,390 --> 01:11:13,809

Jessica: Right?

:

01:11:13,900 --> 01:11:14,940

These sorts of things.

:

01:11:16,280 --> 01:11:18,510

Um, so again, it's still on your list.

:

01:11:19,840 --> 01:11:24,000

It may still be really important to

you and if it is in that category

:

01:11:24,000 --> 01:11:27,160

that, you know, research has said

like this doesn't actually contribute

:

01:11:27,160 --> 01:11:30,850

to happiness, it might be worth

placing those in the wants section.

:

01:11:31,370 --> 01:11:32,820

Now again, you do you.

:

01:11:33,110 --> 01:11:37,309

If there's something in there that you're

like, no, I genuinely cannot, you know,

:

01:11:37,460 --> 01:11:43,700

date someone who is ex religion, then

you need to have your list reflect that.

:

01:11:45,680 --> 01:11:51,180

Josh: Yeah, this isn't about doing

what you should do because you think

:

01:11:51,190 --> 01:11:52,830

that's what it's supposed to look like.

:

01:11:52,840 --> 01:11:53,620

It really is.

:

01:11:54,070 --> 01:12:01,490

A deep inquiry for you of what is on your,

like, this is absolutely essential list.

:

01:12:02,420 --> 01:12:06,270

And for some people, yeah, they,

it's essential for them to be raising

:

01:12:06,270 --> 01:12:08,059

their children in the same religion.

:

01:12:08,140 --> 01:12:08,450

Jessica: Yeah.

:

01:12:08,540 --> 01:12:11,330

Josh: And they need a partner who's at

least going to be on board with that.

:

01:12:11,400 --> 01:12:11,780

Jessica: Yeah.

:

01:12:11,820 --> 01:12:12,400

Absolutely.

:

01:12:14,315 --> 01:12:14,655

Yeah.

:

01:12:14,675 --> 01:12:18,965

One thing I also want to add about

these lists is, um, I find that

:

01:12:19,115 --> 01:12:24,785

people tend towards one side of, uh, a

spectrum or another with this exercise.

:

01:12:24,825 --> 01:12:29,815

Either they have like a lot of

requirements and a lot of them they

:

01:12:29,815 --> 01:12:33,415

consider deal breakers or they're just

kind of confused about what they need.

:

01:12:33,415 --> 01:12:35,055

They don't actually

have a lot on the list.

:

01:12:35,125 --> 01:12:35,375

Interesting.

:

01:12:35,925 --> 01:12:41,090

Jessica: And so I would have you

really think about Would my friends

:

01:12:41,090 --> 01:12:44,770

say I'm a little too picky or would

they say I'm not picky enough?

:

01:12:45,300 --> 01:12:50,160

And that might really point you towards

looking at the requirements list in

:

01:12:50,160 --> 01:12:53,950

particular and considering whether more

needs to be on there or actually less.

:

01:12:54,809 --> 01:12:59,600

A really great question that I like

to hold on to to kind of clarify

:

01:12:59,600 --> 01:13:04,910

where things go on this list is

if I met someone with every other

:

01:13:04,910 --> 01:13:06,610

trait that I want in a partner.

:

01:13:07,105 --> 01:13:11,515

Aside from this one trait I'm looking

at, would I be willing to accept that?

:

01:13:12,575 --> 01:13:16,065

I think that really clarifies,

like, is this a deal breaker or?

:

01:13:18,295 --> 01:13:19,245

Josh: That's a great question.

:

01:13:19,865 --> 01:13:20,355

Cool.

:

01:13:21,225 --> 01:13:23,845

Well, this has been a wonderful, uh, chat.

:

01:13:23,845 --> 01:13:24,395

I've enjoyed it.

:

01:13:24,395 --> 01:13:26,695

I hope other folks are

enjoying it as well.

:

01:13:27,065 --> 01:13:29,335

Um, should we wrap it up here for today?

:

01:13:30,050 --> 01:13:31,030

Jessica: Can I say one

more thing, actually?

:

01:13:31,190 --> 01:13:31,630

Of course.

:

01:13:32,809 --> 01:13:35,690

All of this may be a little bit

overwhelming and may feel a little

:

01:13:35,690 --> 01:13:38,360

bit like, I still don't feel clear.

:

01:13:38,990 --> 01:13:41,360

I really want to emphasize

here, this, this is going to

:

01:13:41,360 --> 01:13:42,870

take a little bit of a process.

:

01:13:43,100 --> 01:13:46,520

Okay, so just thinking in your,

in your head about all of these

:

01:13:46,530 --> 01:13:48,930

things may not be quite enough.

:

01:13:48,980 --> 01:13:51,130

And so, number one, put pen to paper.

:

01:13:52,400 --> 01:13:53,900

That can be so clarifying.

:

01:13:54,300 --> 01:13:58,309

And number two, get into conversation

with a friend or perhaps a professional

:

01:13:58,820 --> 01:14:03,900

to really help you, um, yeah, pull

apart what truly is important for you.

:

01:14:03,950 --> 01:14:07,180

You don't need to do this alone,

and in fact, I don't recommend it.

:

01:14:07,240 --> 01:14:11,240

Josh: Yeah, I am so grateful for all

of the friends and coaches and mentors

:

01:14:11,240 --> 01:14:15,780

who have supported me in my journey

with love and partnership, and it

:

01:14:15,850 --> 01:14:17,580

makes such a big difference to not be.

:

01:14:17,960 --> 01:14:19,320

Trying to figure it out by yourself.

:

01:14:19,460 --> 01:14:20,230

Jessica: Absolutely.

:

01:14:21,920 --> 01:14:22,440

Josh: All right.

:

01:14:22,840 --> 01:14:26,260

Well, thanks for joining

us for this episode today.

:

01:14:26,290 --> 01:14:28,960

If you found this episode useful,

we'd love for you to leave us a rating

:

01:14:28,960 --> 01:14:31,470

and review in your Apple podcast app.

:

01:14:32,040 --> 01:14:35,330

And you can find everything that

we mentioned in this show in our

:

01:14:35,330 --> 01:14:36,525

show notes on Apple Podcasts.

:

01:14:36,825 --> 01:14:37,875

Relationshipcenter.

:

01:14:37,915 --> 01:14:41,615

com slash podcast and until next time,

:

01:14:42,015 --> 01:14:42,684

Jessica: we love you too.

:

01:15:07,225 --> 01:15:12,235

Um, Uh, Um, Uh, Um, Uh,

:

01:15:14,755 --> 01:15:16,714

Um, Um, Uh.

:

01:15:16,714 --> 01:15:17,549

Ooh.

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube