In this episode of the Future Proof HR podcast, Thomas Kunjappu sits down with Jamie Rivero, HR Director at MYCO Mechanical, Inc., to explore what disciplined HR leadership looks like in a rapidly changing environment. Drawing on nearly two decades of experience across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, retail, and construction, Jamie shares how HR leaders can navigate AI adoption and major system decisions without losing credibility or trust.
Jamie explains why moving too fast on AI and HR technology often creates more problems than it solves. She unpacks the importance of understanding the business before evaluating tools, pressure-testing vendor claims, and building ROI cases that connect time saved to real business outcomes rather than surface-level efficiency metrics.
The conversation also examines where AI can support HR teams and where human judgment must remain central. Jamie outlines how HR leaders can reduce low-value work with technology while protecting high-stakes decisions like hiring, performance management, and employee relations, offering a grounded view of what it takes to lead HR through ongoing change.
Topics Discussed:
If you are an HR leader, people strategist, or executive navigating AI, HR technology, and constant change, this episode offers practical insight into how experienced HR leaders make decisions that stand the test of time.
Additional Resources:
And it's like everybody thinks AI.
2
00:00:02,020 --> 00:00:05,670
Just because it's AI, it's going to
simplify things, or it's going to reduce
3
00:00:05,670 --> 00:00:07,530
costs, or it's going to reduce headcount.
4
00:00:07,550 --> 00:00:11,430
And I feel like you really need to
do a lot of due diligence when it
5
00:00:11,430 --> 00:00:15,480
comes to vetting AI technology and
really figuring out and spending
6
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:17,010
the time if it's the right fit.
7
00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:19,840
Thomas Kunjappu: They keep
telling us that it's all over.
8
00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:23,860
For HR, the age of AI is upon
us, and that means HR should
9
00:00:23,860 --> 00:00:25,510
be prepared to be decimated.
10
00:00:26,020 --> 00:00:27,370
We reject that message.
11
00:00:27,610 --> 00:00:29,710
The future of HR won't be handed to us.
12
00:00:29,860 --> 00:00:34,960
Instead, it'll be defined by those
ready to experiment, adopt, and adapt.
13
00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:40,420
Future Proof HR invites these builders to
share what they're trying, how it's going,
14
00:00:40,660 --> 00:00:42,520
what they've learned, and what's next.
15
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:46,930
We are committed to arming HR
with the AI insights to not
16
00:00:46,930 --> 00:00:48,610
just survive, but to thrive.
17
00:00:53,790 --> 00:00:57,480
Welcome to the Future Proof HR podcast,
where we explore how forward thinking
18
00:00:57,480 --> 00:00:59,575
HR leaders are preparing for disruption.
19
00:00:59,969 --> 00:01:03,129
Thomas Kunjappu: and redefining what it
means to lead people in a changing world.
20
00:01:03,469 --> 00:01:06,719
I'm your host, Thomas
Kunjappu, CEO of Cleary.
21
00:01:07,099 --> 00:01:09,039
Today's guest is Jamie Rivero,
22
00:01:09,389 --> 00:01:11,699
HR Director at MYCO Mechanical, Inc.
23
00:01:12,089 --> 00:01:16,809
A strategic global HR and operations
leader, Jamie focuses on aligning
24
00:01:16,809 --> 00:01:18,609
human capital to business outcomes.
25
00:01:19,069 --> 00:01:22,989
Building culture that drives performance
while safeguarding compliance and risk.
26
00:01:23,619 --> 00:01:27,419
With experience leading transformation
and fostering resilient teams, Jamie
27
00:01:27,419 --> 00:01:30,499
blends integrity, a clear strategic
vision, and hands-on operational
28
00:01:30,499 --> 00:01:32,729
chops to deliver measurable results.
29
00:01:33,009 --> 00:01:34,419
Jamie, welcome to the podcast.
30
00:01:34,899 --> 00:01:35,959
Jamie Rivero: Thank you for having me.
31
00:01:36,839 --> 00:01:41,289
Thomas Kunjappu: So tell me a little
bit about your background and the
32
00:01:41,289 --> 00:01:43,639
scope and industry that you work at.
33
00:01:44,299 --> 00:01:44,679
Jamie Rivero: Sure.
34
00:01:45,019 --> 00:01:47,999
So I've been working in human
resources for about 18 years.
35
00:01:48,039 --> 00:01:51,569
I've worked in grocery, like
grocery retail, healthcare,
36
00:01:51,859 --> 00:01:54,709
manufacturing and logistics,
where I spent most of my career.
37
00:01:54,709 --> 00:01:58,299
And now about six months ago, I
made the jump into construction,
38
00:01:58,309 --> 00:02:01,599
which has been definitely a
change, but there's definitely some
39
00:02:01,599 --> 00:02:03,469
similarities in the manufacturing
40
00:02:03,489 --> 00:02:05,619
and warehousing background.
41
00:02:05,629 --> 00:02:07,559
And I oversee all facets of HR.
42
00:02:07,809 --> 00:02:12,259
So from recruitment all the
way up to talent development,
43
00:02:12,259 --> 00:02:14,419
full life cycle of employment.
44
00:02:15,759 --> 00:02:18,449
Thomas Kunjappu: That is a
lot of different industries.
45
00:02:18,478 --> 00:02:21,259
I'd be excited to get into what's similar,
46
00:02:21,259 --> 00:02:21,879
what's different.
47
00:02:22,309 --> 00:02:29,399
But first, I'd like to ask you a little
bit about how you've maybe moved across
48
00:02:29,399 --> 00:02:32,309
different companies with AI-driven
cultures that are a little bit different
49
00:02:32,319 --> 00:02:36,789
or attitudes towards AI and or technology.
50
00:02:37,369 --> 00:02:40,459
Can you tell me a little bit about
these mindset shifts and what that
51
00:02:40,459 --> 00:02:42,549
means for you being an HR leader?
52
00:02:43,759 --> 00:02:47,119
Jamie Rivero: So I definitely
have dealt with a stark difference
53
00:02:47,119 --> 00:02:48,889
in terms of attitude shifts
54
00:02:48,889 --> 00:02:49,289
towards AI.
55
00:02:49,869 --> 00:02:55,668
So my previous company was running
towards AI at a very fast pace,
56
00:02:55,668 --> 00:03:01,679
which I am all for AI, but I feel
like right now it's like a buzzword.
57
00:03:01,689 --> 00:03:05,589
And it's like everybody thinks, you know,
AI, just because it's AI, it's going to
58
00:03:05,969 --> 00:03:09,489
simplify things, or it's going to reduce
costs, or it's going to reduce headcount.
59
00:03:09,509 --> 00:03:13,389
And I feel like you really need to
do a lot of due diligence when it
60
00:03:13,389 --> 00:03:17,439
comes to vetting AI technology and
really figuring out and spending
61
00:03:17,439 --> 00:03:18,969
the time if it's the right fit.
62
00:03:19,519 --> 00:03:24,839
And where I'm at now, definitely not as
running towards it that quickly, which
63
00:03:24,849 --> 00:03:28,919
is obviously a big difference, but I
actually welcome it because I do, I feel
64
00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:30,326
like you need to find the balance with AI.
65
00:03:30,326 --> 00:03:33,653
And I'm sure we'll jump into it
a little bit more in terms of why
66
00:03:33,653 --> 00:03:34,401
that is and why that's a benefit.
67
00:03:34,401 --> 00:03:36,079
Thomas Kunjappu: So then what does
68
00:03:40,799 --> 00:03:45,129
that mean for you as an HR leader in
your day-to-day when you have this?
69
00:03:45,129 --> 00:03:49,139
Because it's one thing for the business to
have like an attitude or a certain culture
70
00:03:49,139 --> 00:03:54,679
around AI, but then what does
that mean for you and how your
71
00:03:54,679 --> 00:03:56,099
daily rhythms are different?
72
00:03:57,299 --> 00:04:03,489
Jamie Rivero: Yeah, so AI definitely
has hit HR as an industry very heavily.
73
00:04:03,549 --> 00:04:05,339
And it's a topic at all
74
00:04:05,339 --> 00:04:06,249
the conferences.
75
00:04:06,249 --> 00:04:08,049
I've been seeing it for
the last couple years.
76
00:04:08,049 --> 00:04:10,909
It's like most of the content
at HR conferences is now AI.
77
00:04:12,239 --> 00:04:18,019
And where I feel like it's a little
bit challenging is I feel like so
78
00:04:18,019 --> 00:04:22,899
much technology has flooded the space
right now, but there hasn't been a
79
00:04:22,899 --> 00:04:26,839
whole lot of framework in terms of
best practices on how to implement it.
80
00:04:26,849 --> 00:04:30,269
What are the implications of AI
technology, especially from a
81
00:04:30,269 --> 00:04:31,899
legal and a compliance standpoint?
82
00:04:31,899 --> 00:04:35,739
And that's a lot of the feedback that I've
heard at a lot of these HR conferences.
83
00:04:35,739 --> 00:04:39,979
It's like AI, AI, but it's like,
how do we actually implement it?
84
00:04:40,009 --> 00:04:41,589
What are the best practices?
85
00:04:42,159 --> 00:04:47,279
And I feel like maybe we ran a little bit
too fast towards AI and we skipped some of
86
00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:47,779
those steps.
87
00:04:47,779 --> 00:04:50,308
And I feel like a lot of companies
are now trying to figure out
88
00:04:50,359 --> 00:04:52,209
all of that kind of legal
89
00:04:52,209 --> 00:04:55,879
and compliance aspect, which
I think is really important.
90
00:04:56,308 --> 00:05:00,299
And for me, also, HR, there's a
HR, there's a human aspect to it.
91
00:05:00,579 --> 00:05:05,339
And we can talk about later about
the implications of when it's
92
00:05:05,339 --> 00:05:07,279
appropriate to use AI technology.
93
00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:11,159
But there's certain things in HR where I
don't know that it's ever going to make
94
00:05:11,159 --> 00:05:13,849
sense for AI technology to be utilized.
95
00:05:13,849 --> 00:05:19,139
And that's something that I feel like as
HR leaders, we really need to figure out.
96
00:05:19,209 --> 00:05:23,539
And I feel like also we also
need to embrace AI technology.
97
00:05:23,539 --> 00:05:26,659
Like I know there's a lot of
people who are resistant to
98
00:05:26,659 --> 00:05:27,639
it, because a lot of times when
99
00:05:27,639 --> 00:05:31,109
you hear AI, you think, you know,
it's going to replace jobs, and
100
00:05:31,189 --> 00:05:32,619
it's going to eliminate our jobs.
101
00:05:32,619 --> 00:05:38,129
And I feel like we need to be open
to it, but also understand, like,
102
00:05:38,139 --> 00:05:39,709
it's not going to take our job.
103
00:05:39,739 --> 00:05:43,079
And I feel like if you position
yourself, like you will be
104
00:05:43,089 --> 00:05:45,509
a very valuable HR person.
105
00:05:45,509 --> 00:05:49,229
Like there's no way that AI technology
is going to totally eliminate your job.
106
00:05:50,859 --> 00:05:54,279
Thomas Kunjappu: So there's a lot to
unpack there, but let's start with, I
107
00:05:54,279 --> 00:05:56,159
guess, just the concept up top, right?
108
00:05:56,159 --> 00:05:59,419
That like from a vendor perspective,
there's been lots of pushing of
109
00:05:59,419 --> 00:06:01,859
the technology into the HR realm.
110
00:06:01,874 --> 00:06:03,049
You've had some experience with this.
111
00:06:03,049 --> 00:06:07,119
Like do you evaluate a potential
partnership in, I guess you call
112
00:06:07,119 --> 00:06:08,469
it right, it's a flooded market.
113
00:06:09,059 --> 00:06:09,649
Jamie Rivero: Yeah.
114
00:06:10,159 --> 00:06:11,744
And it definitely is a flooded market.
115
00:06:11,744 --> 00:06:14,902
If you walk expos at conferences,
I would say probably like 40
116
00:06:14,902 --> 00:06:16,764
to 50% of it now is all AI
117
00:06:16,949 --> 00:06:18,349
technology, maybe more.
118
00:06:18,829 --> 00:06:21,979
And I would say definitely,
first and foremost, you need
119
00:06:21,979 --> 00:06:23,279
to understand your business.
120
00:06:23,299 --> 00:06:27,279
And when I say that from an HR
perspective, it's not just understanding
121
00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:28,979
your business from an HR perspective.
122
00:06:29,129 --> 00:06:32,209
If you want to be an effective
HR leader, you need to understand
123
00:06:32,209 --> 00:06:33,429
the business as a whole.
124
00:06:34,049 --> 00:06:37,539
And that's something that I always
try to do anytime I join a company.
125
00:06:37,799 --> 00:06:40,558
I want to understand my role,
but I also want to understand
126
00:06:40,558 --> 00:06:42,069
how my role impacts other
127
00:06:42,069 --> 00:06:43,069
areas of the business.
128
00:06:43,379 --> 00:06:46,439
Because oftentimes when you're
implementing AI technology,
129
00:06:46,439 --> 00:06:48,149
like it's going to impact not
130
00:06:48,149 --> 00:06:48,558
just HR.
131
00:06:49,409 --> 00:06:52,289
And if it's from an HR
perspective, it's going to impact
132
00:06:52,308 --> 00:06:53,499
other areas of the business.
133
00:06:53,509 --> 00:06:55,469
So I think having a full
understanding of that.
134
00:06:55,889 --> 00:06:57,504
Also vetting the software.
135
00:06:57,529 --> 00:07:01,199
Is this a software
company that is brand new?
136
00:07:01,519 --> 00:07:03,019
Has it been around a while?
137
00:07:03,059 --> 00:07:06,839
Understanding does this
software fit my business today?
138
00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:09,529
And is it going to fit my
business if my business doubles
139
00:07:09,529 --> 00:07:10,299
or triples?
140
00:07:10,739 --> 00:07:14,849
I think oftentimes people make a lot of
short-sighted decisions and I've seen
141
00:07:14,849 --> 00:07:20,159
it over the years where it's like you
decide on a technology or a software
142
00:07:20,169 --> 00:07:24,289
and, you know, it fits your business
today, but then you're not thinking
143
00:07:24,339 --> 00:07:28,399
a couple of years down the road, is
this software going to be able to grow
144
00:07:28,399 --> 00:07:30,319
and support the company as we grow?
145
00:07:30,859 --> 00:07:34,949
Because there's a lot of money
and time that gets spent in
146
00:07:34,999 --> 00:07:36,589
implementing different types
147
00:07:36,589 --> 00:07:37,989
of software solutions.
148
00:07:38,019 --> 00:07:41,859
And there's nothing worse than
spending a ton of time on a project.
149
00:07:41,859 --> 00:07:45,159
And then three years later, you're
like, this doesn't fit anymore.
150
00:07:45,558 --> 00:07:49,279
And then also definitely
diving into the ROI.
151
00:07:50,849 --> 00:07:54,808
So I feel like a lot of these software
companies, and I see it because I've been
152
00:07:54,808 --> 00:07:56,589
through a lot of these sales pitches.
153
00:07:56,599 --> 00:07:58,264
It's we can save you $1.2
154
00:07:58,709 --> 00:08:01,399
million, we can save you $300,000.
155
00:08:01,399 --> 00:08:03,379
And it's and it goes back
to my point of you really
156
00:08:03,379 --> 00:08:07,259
need to know your business because
you should be calculating the ROI.
157
00:08:07,819 --> 00:08:10,729
Obviously they can give you
tips and help you with it.
158
00:08:10,729 --> 00:08:13,649
But I always get fearful when
companies are like, we'll do
159
00:08:13,649 --> 00:08:15,189
the ROI calculation for you.
160
00:08:15,189 --> 00:08:18,369
And then they start throwing these
random numbers and it's, we'll even
161
00:08:18,369 --> 00:08:20,189
talk to your executive team about it.
162
00:08:20,189 --> 00:08:23,939
And I'm like, I can't even imagine like
putting you in front of my executive team
163
00:08:23,939 --> 00:08:25,479
because you don't even know our business.
164
00:08:25,529 --> 00:08:27,029
Like they're going to poke holes in that.
165
00:08:27,029 --> 00:08:30,689
So I think it's really important to
vet that and also get references.
166
00:08:30,699 --> 00:08:33,078
Like I've been through sales pitches.
167
00:08:33,078 --> 00:08:36,068
I've been through almost to the point
where we're going to sign and they can't
168
00:08:36,078 --> 00:08:41,088
produce references that are similar to
our business or who could talk to what
169
00:08:41,219 --> 00:08:42,919
exactly we need the software to do.
170
00:08:43,669 --> 00:08:46,759
So I think it's really hammering
home, like spending a lot of
171
00:08:46,759 --> 00:08:50,199
time in that due diligence phase
before you sign a contract.
172
00:08:52,039 --> 00:08:52,369
Thomas Kunjappu: Got it.
173
00:08:52,369 --> 00:08:57,349
So due diligence, understanding your
business, figuring out your process.
174
00:08:57,429 --> 00:09:00,329
There's the understanding
the potential vendor partner.
175
00:09:00,809 --> 00:09:06,559
And if you put it all together, you
can create something that can work.
176
00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:10,254
But then I've also heard about
leveraging pilots wherever
177
00:09:10,624 --> 00:09:12,434
you can try before you buy.
178
00:09:12,714 --> 00:09:13,684
Does that generally work?
179
00:09:13,714 --> 00:09:16,884
Has that worked for you or
does it depend on the use case?
180
00:09:17,614 --> 00:09:19,284
Jamie Rivero: It's a great idea in theory.
181
00:09:19,294 --> 00:09:23,764
What I oftentimes find is there are a
lot of software companies that will offer
182
00:09:23,764 --> 00:09:27,374
you pilots, but it's oftentimes not live.
183
00:09:27,634 --> 00:09:34,494
It's a sandbox type of territory
where you can't really fully
184
00:09:34,634 --> 00:09:36,734
see what it can do as it's
185
00:09:36,764 --> 00:09:38,124
integrated into your business.
186
00:09:38,134 --> 00:09:42,764
And that's where I found I
oftentimes struggle because I've
187
00:09:42,764 --> 00:09:44,044
run into situations, and I'm
188
00:09:44,044 --> 00:09:47,424
sure a lot of people experience this
where, sales people will tell you
189
00:09:47,424 --> 00:09:50,634
whatever and they'll tell you, oh, yeah,
the software does this, it does that.
190
00:09:50,634 --> 00:09:54,324
And then it's like you get midway through
the implementation and it's no, actually,
191
00:09:54,334 --> 00:09:56,274
it can't do that or that's custom.
192
00:09:56,734 --> 00:10:00,154
And then they try to charge you for
the development and stuff like that.
193
00:10:00,164 --> 00:10:03,734
And that's why I say I think pilot
programs are definitely helpful.
194
00:10:03,734 --> 00:10:06,454
And the more that you
can see live, the better.
195
00:10:06,574 --> 00:10:10,624
But you also have go into
it knowing like, it is very
196
00:10:10,624 --> 00:10:12,594
difficult to vet everything out.
197
00:10:12,694 --> 00:10:13,704
But I think it's important.
198
00:10:13,914 --> 00:10:17,014
Like, you don't want to skip
that due diligence phase.
199
00:10:18,654 --> 00:10:21,634
Thomas Kunjappu: And then do you
think that there's some things that
200
00:10:21,634 --> 00:10:22,914
are just I don't know, are there some
201
00:10:22,914 --> 00:10:27,904
use cases or types of areas
that are just really hard to
202
00:10:27,904 --> 00:10:32,554
do right and leads naturally to
over-promising and under-delivering?
203
00:10:32,564 --> 00:10:36,934
Or is it really just, in your
experience, about the specific
204
00:10:36,999 --> 00:10:38,689
partnership in question?
205
00:10:39,339 --> 00:10:40,459
Jamie Rivero: I think it's a mix of both.
206
00:10:40,509 --> 00:10:46,459
A lot of companies have very specific ways
and processes that they do certain things.
207
00:10:46,469 --> 00:10:48,789
I'll give you an example,
performance review process.
208
00:10:49,809 --> 00:10:55,789
I ran into a situation where
I didn't feel 100% about the
209
00:10:55,789 --> 00:10:57,929
performance module of the software.
210
00:10:58,339 --> 00:11:02,039
I knew going into it was probably going
to be a little bit of a challenge, but
211
00:11:02,059 --> 00:11:07,449
I was a little surprised during the
implementation of how hard it was to get
212
00:11:07,459 --> 00:11:09,879
the system to do something so simple.
213
00:11:10,289 --> 00:11:13,979
And I think that companies need
to consider that when they're
214
00:11:13,979 --> 00:11:19,289
evaluating software, like how firm
are you on your existing process?
215
00:11:19,309 --> 00:11:23,089
Because a lot of times like you have
to adapt and sometimes you have to
216
00:11:23,089 --> 00:11:25,389
pivot and change to make things work.
217
00:11:25,869 --> 00:11:29,679
And then there's certain companies
where they're just dead set on
218
00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:30,670
this is how it's going to be adapt.
219
00:11:30,670 --> 00:11:30,673
And sometimes you have to pivot
and change to make things work.
220
00:11:30,673 --> 00:11:30,679
And then there's certain companies
where they're just dead set on
221
00:11:30,679 --> 00:11:31,159
this is how it's going to be done.
222
00:11:31,159 --> 00:11:34,459
And then obviously it's a big
problem when the software solution
223
00:11:34,479 --> 00:11:36,569
can't do what you need it to do.
224
00:11:36,569 --> 00:11:41,099
And I think that I'm running into a lot
of that in the market right now where
225
00:11:41,099 --> 00:11:44,199
it's like they lack the customization.
226
00:11:44,269 --> 00:11:46,269
And I think that if you're
a company where you need
227
00:11:46,269 --> 00:11:47,619
customization, that's something you
228
00:11:47,619 --> 00:11:50,229
really need to vet in
the process early on.
229
00:11:51,099 --> 00:11:54,169
But if you're not and you're looking
for more of that out of the box turnkey
230
00:11:54,179 --> 00:11:55,949
solution, then that works for you.
231
00:11:55,969 --> 00:12:00,029
But it just depends on like the specific
processes of your business and how married
232
00:12:00,029 --> 00:12:01,019
you are to them.
233
00:12:02,729 --> 00:12:03,149
Thomas Kunjappu: I see.
234
00:12:03,149 --> 00:12:08,249
So then you mentioned ROI and how
that's important own yourself and
235
00:12:08,309 --> 00:12:12,189
understanding the nuances of the business
versus something that's more generic.
236
00:12:12,519 --> 00:12:15,329
Can you tell me a little bit about
your, at least your mental model for
237
00:12:15,529 --> 00:12:18,899
making these ROI cases to leadership?
238
00:12:18,899 --> 00:12:22,639
What are the inputs and the kind
of the so what's that you go for?
239
00:12:23,499 --> 00:12:23,759
Jamie Rivero: Yeah.
240
00:12:23,769 --> 00:12:27,929
So most of my career, and I feel
like I've been very successful
241
00:12:27,929 --> 00:12:33,509
with pushing big initiatives because
I do spend so much time to figure out
242
00:12:33,519 --> 00:12:39,679
what the ROI is and really lay it out
where it's like when I'm coming to the
243
00:12:39,679 --> 00:12:45,189
executive team to spend money or to
implement something, I've already thought
244
00:12:45,199 --> 00:12:48,979
through in terms of what are the benefits,
245
00:12:48,999 --> 00:12:52,049
what are the downfalls, so
the pros and cons, what are
246
00:12:52,049 --> 00:12:54,129
the costs associated with it?
247
00:12:54,149 --> 00:12:55,879
When will we typically see the ROI?
248
00:12:57,099 --> 00:13:00,559
What are all the inputs
or processes that go in?
249
00:13:00,569 --> 00:13:05,459
How am I measuring them, understanding
like what is the expected outcome,
250
00:13:05,459 --> 00:13:06,879
but also taking a step further.
251
00:13:06,989 --> 00:13:11,199
And I found that obviously I was in
an operations role heavily as well.
252
00:13:11,489 --> 00:13:16,189
Everybody wants technology and
they want enhancements and stuff
253
00:13:16,189 --> 00:13:19,919
like that, but they come at a cost.
254
00:13:19,939 --> 00:13:22,239
So what are we getting from the cost?
255
00:13:22,289 --> 00:13:27,539
And oftentimes I'm laying out, okay,
we're going to free up this many
256
00:13:27,539 --> 00:13:30,749
hours a week, or we're going to free
up this person, but then also coming
257
00:13:30,749 --> 00:13:33,089
with a plan in terms of this is
258
00:13:33,212 --> 00:13:36,242
Speaker 3: This is now what I'm gonna
do with this person, or this is now
259
00:13:36,242 --> 00:13:39,572
what I'm gonna do with this time,
or I'm gonna eliminate head count.
260
00:13:39,932 --> 00:13:45,212
I feel like taking it so far, like
that has made it very easy for
261
00:13:45,212 --> 00:13:46,772
me to get things pushed through.
262
00:13:47,284 --> 00:13:49,839
Jamie Rivero: Whereas I've seen
other people, they struggle.
263
00:13:49,839 --> 00:13:53,309
It's this software is going
to cost $57,000 a year.
264
00:13:53,309 --> 00:13:54,669
And then you have executives,
265
00:13:54,669 --> 00:13:55,939
like, where are we getting this money?
266
00:13:55,939 --> 00:13:57,049
Why are we going to spend on it?
267
00:13:57,059 --> 00:13:58,119
What's the value?
268
00:13:58,529 --> 00:14:02,749
And that's why I think it's important
to really be able to build that business
269
00:14:02,749 --> 00:14:07,669
case, because I think it makes it so
much easier, but also understanding.
270
00:14:07,669 --> 00:14:11,589
Maybe you go through the ROI process and
you realize, and I've actually ran into
271
00:14:11,589 --> 00:14:13,799
this, where the software looks so great.
272
00:14:13,809 --> 00:14:15,219
It looked like such a great solution.
273
00:14:15,219 --> 00:14:17,109
It was cutting edge, leading the market.
274
00:14:17,109 --> 00:14:19,919
But then I'm like, wait a
minute, there's no ROI here.
275
00:14:20,319 --> 00:14:25,209
Or the ROI is so minimal compared to
the amount of work and stuff like that.
276
00:14:25,209 --> 00:14:27,849
And it's just there's no
justification for the cost.
277
00:14:27,849 --> 00:14:29,519
And sometimes that does happen too.
278
00:14:30,909 --> 00:14:32,649
Thomas Kunjappu: So you told me
something that, you just mentioned
279
00:14:32,649 --> 00:14:34,409
something that's this next level,
280
00:14:34,419 --> 00:14:37,749
which is an ROI calculation
typically says, look, we saved this
281
00:14:37,749 --> 00:14:39,469
many hours or this many dollars.
282
00:14:39,609 --> 00:14:43,159
And that's usually expressed
in time for personnel, right?
283
00:14:43,409 --> 00:14:46,749
Maybe there's other things about like
outcomes, whether it's whatever it is,
284
00:14:46,799 --> 00:14:51,679
error reduction or compliance,
which is just useful or some
285
00:14:51,679 --> 00:14:53,559
kind of employee productivity
286
00:14:53,559 --> 00:14:54,409
benefit as well.
287
00:14:54,409 --> 00:14:58,669
But strictly on the HR team, it's
typically about like hours saved, right?
288
00:14:58,709 --> 00:15:02,049
That goes into the outcome.
289
00:15:02,049 --> 00:15:05,069
But then you're taking that a step
further to say why the hours saved
290
00:15:05,079 --> 00:15:08,604
matter, not assuming that everyone
thinks that itself is a goal.
291
00:15:08,624 --> 00:15:11,684
Because why, after all,
does the HR team get paid?
292
00:15:11,694 --> 00:15:14,434
It's to spend time doing
things that is valuable, right?
293
00:15:14,434 --> 00:15:19,004
But then if you're going to save time,
you're saying, but then here are things
294
00:15:19,004 --> 00:15:23,304
that is business aligned that we can do
that is even more important that we're
295
00:15:23,304 --> 00:15:24,944
going to be able to do with that time.
296
00:15:24,944 --> 00:15:30,774
So the ROI isn't like this many hours
saved, but it's these other things
297
00:15:30,874 --> 00:15:34,004
done without any new additional hiring.
298
00:15:34,724 --> 00:15:35,894
Jamie Rivero: Yeah, absolutely.
299
00:15:35,904 --> 00:15:37,084
Because you have to be careful.
300
00:15:37,084 --> 00:15:38,924
I've run into situations where
301
00:15:38,924 --> 00:15:44,164
I've had managers come to me and we
had invested a bunch in enhancements,
302
00:15:44,174 --> 00:15:45,774
software development, that type of stuff.
303
00:15:46,294 --> 00:15:49,434
And they're still telling me that
they're overloaded with their work
304
00:15:49,434 --> 00:15:50,934
and they need more head count.
305
00:15:50,944 --> 00:15:53,424
And I'm like, but wait a
minute, we've done all this.
306
00:15:53,474 --> 00:15:54,914
So there's something wrong there.
307
00:15:54,924 --> 00:16:00,054
So I think like being able to make that
case of this is what we plan to save
308
00:16:00,164 --> 00:16:02,089
and taking a step further and sharing.
309
00:16:02,124 --> 00:16:06,724
This is the value that we can bring
to the business and looking at more HR
310
00:16:06,724 --> 00:16:10,334
related activities that maybe have fell
by the wayside that we could focus on.
311
00:16:10,334 --> 00:16:13,404
Or I feel like businesses
are also changing so rapidly.
312
00:16:13,414 --> 00:16:17,414
And I think a lot of businesses want
like that human connection still.
313
00:16:17,414 --> 00:16:22,294
So if we can free up our HR team where
they're not doing these monotonous
314
00:16:22,304 --> 00:16:26,354
type tasks, what more can we add
on their plate that is going to
315
00:16:26,354 --> 00:16:27,744
connect to the bottom line of the
316
00:16:27,814 --> 00:16:30,984
business or connect to our
strategic goals of the business?
317
00:16:32,184 --> 00:16:36,274
Thomas Kunjappu: Yeah, there's so many
different interrelated problems, right?
318
00:16:36,724 --> 00:16:39,044
And it's sometimes hard to
pinpoint exactly what it is.
319
00:16:39,044 --> 00:16:41,154
So I feel like there's
something there in that story.
320
00:16:41,354 --> 00:16:46,114
Can you tell me a little bit more about
that manager or management investment?
321
00:16:46,114 --> 00:16:47,474
What was the initial thinking?
322
00:16:47,484 --> 00:16:51,634
And I imagine there was some kind of
like software or technology solution
323
00:16:51,644 --> 00:16:55,804
that we thought would solve the
problem, but maybe it was still there.
324
00:16:56,364 --> 00:16:57,634
So what was the initial thinking?
325
00:16:57,634 --> 00:16:59,784
And then how did that evolve?
326
00:16:59,834 --> 00:17:00,684
And maybe you can
327
00:17:00,684 --> 00:17:03,454
think of everything as an experiment
along the way that worked or
328
00:17:03,454 --> 00:17:07,044
didn't work, but maybe the root
cause itself was misdiagnosed?
329
00:17:07,064 --> 00:17:08,584
Or how do you think about that?
330
00:17:09,444 --> 00:17:09,904
Jamie Rivero: Yeah.
331
00:17:09,904 --> 00:17:13,874
So obviously there were a
lot of enhancements that
332
00:17:13,874 --> 00:17:16,064
were made in our ERP system.
333
00:17:16,084 --> 00:17:19,614
And we have an in-house team, but
we also had consultants and there's
334
00:17:19,614 --> 00:17:21,314
a lot of costs that's associated.
335
00:17:21,314 --> 00:17:25,364
And oftentimes when you're looking
at those enhancements, you want
336
00:17:25,364 --> 00:17:27,324
to understand what is the ROI?
337
00:17:27,779 --> 00:17:29,514
Is this worth our time and money?
338
00:17:29,544 --> 00:17:36,194
And having the manager fully understand or
present what exactly is this change going
339
00:17:36,194 --> 00:17:39,104
to simplify and taking it a step further.
340
00:17:39,814 --> 00:17:43,584
And one of the things we were seeing
a number of enhancements being
341
00:17:43,584 --> 00:17:47,584
made, but it was like business
was not drastically changing in
342
00:17:47,584 --> 00:17:51,904
terms of sales, but the manager
continually was like, I'm overloaded.
343
00:17:51,904 --> 00:17:53,214
My team's overloaded.
344
00:17:53,864 --> 00:17:56,854
So then I'm questioning,
okay, what is going on here?
345
00:17:56,984 --> 00:18:02,244
We did these four things and this
was supposed to reduce our spend.
346
00:18:02,254 --> 00:18:04,354
And I'm going back into all the
347
00:18:04,354 --> 00:18:06,314
fine details of these projects.
348
00:18:06,334 --> 00:18:09,244
And for me, really management issue.
349
00:18:09,699 --> 00:18:13,944
But also it made me kind of
question, okay, maybe we need to
350
00:18:14,524 --> 00:18:16,384
dive deeper into your analysis.
351
00:18:16,384 --> 00:18:20,064
And that was a pain point I've
learned over the years is like,
352
00:18:20,834 --> 00:18:24,254
you can have teams do analysis of
353
00:18:24,694 --> 00:18:26,824
This has been a fantastic
conversation so far.
354
00:18:27,064 --> 00:18:29,854
If you haven't already done so,
make sure to join our community.
355
00:18:30,094 --> 00:18:32,764
We are building a network of the
most forward-thinking, HR and
356
00:18:32,764 --> 00:18:35,944
people, operational professionals
who are defining the future.
357
00:18:36,424 --> 00:18:39,034
I will personally be sharing
news and ideas around how we
358
00:18:39,034 --> 00:18:41,044
can all thrive in the age of ai.
359
00:18:41,404 --> 00:18:44,389
You can find it at go cleary.com/cleary
360
00:18:44,819 --> 00:18:45,429
community.
361
00:18:46,054 --> 00:18:46,894
Now back to the show.
362
00:18:47,421 --> 00:18:50,701
Jamie Rivero: whether it's time studies,
whether it's ROI and stuff like that.
363
00:18:50,701 --> 00:18:51,751
But it is really important.
364
00:18:51,751 --> 00:18:54,311
Like you can't always take
everything at face value.
365
00:18:54,311 --> 00:18:57,881
And you need to, especially when there's
a significant amount of money involved,
366
00:18:58,351 --> 00:19:01,541
you really have to take the time to
go through that analysis and make
367
00:19:01,541 --> 00:19:03,791
sure are they looking at every aspect?
368
00:19:03,811 --> 00:19:05,461
Are these calculations correct?
369
00:19:05,471 --> 00:19:06,471
I've seen issues where
370
00:19:06,471 --> 00:19:12,611
there's a formula and it's when
you're authorizing financial expenses
371
00:19:12,611 --> 00:19:14,101
or implementing something big
372
00:19:14,101 --> 00:19:15,431
that's going to disrupt the business.
373
00:19:15,431 --> 00:19:17,241
You want to make sure that You want to
make sure that you're doing it right.
374
00:19:17,591 --> 00:19:20,721
And that you're spending money
that is actually adding value.
375
00:19:21,071 --> 00:19:25,341
And for me, like what I was seeing was
maybe these weren't the right solutions.
376
00:19:25,341 --> 00:19:29,421
Like maybe we weren't spending our
time and money in the right areas.
377
00:19:29,941 --> 00:19:34,291
And it made me dive deeper into the
specific management of that area.
378
00:19:34,311 --> 00:19:36,421
And obviously, it's a lesson learned.
379
00:19:36,521 --> 00:19:41,691
Like you really can't just blindly take
everything you have to dive in and make
380
00:19:41,691 --> 00:19:44,741
sure that analysis is 100% accurate.
381
00:19:44,761 --> 00:19:47,731
And if you're not sure, then you need to
make sure that you're asking the right
382
00:19:47,731 --> 00:19:50,251
questions to get to the bottom of that.
383
00:19:51,051 --> 00:19:53,791
Thomas Kunjappu: And which part of
that involves like understanding
384
00:19:53,801 --> 00:19:54,851
how the business works, right?
385
00:19:54,851 --> 00:19:58,011
Or how that group is actually doing
their like day-to-day activities that
386
00:19:58,021 --> 00:20:02,531
leads to this analysis and this set of
concerns, which you're trying to solve
387
00:20:02,541 --> 00:20:04,291
for with some kind of process or software.
388
00:20:04,641 --> 00:20:05,256
Great point.
389
00:20:05,356 --> 00:20:07,026
So it's okay.
390
00:20:07,106 --> 00:20:10,506
Maybe you don't necessarily trust
vendor math or manager math.
391
00:20:10,546 --> 00:20:14,666
And you want to ensure that
you're double checking the work
392
00:20:14,776 --> 00:20:16,356
yourself and that makes sense.
393
00:20:16,446 --> 00:20:20,376
And now that we're in this age of
AI, are all these things the same?
394
00:20:20,376 --> 00:20:23,546
Or do you feel like it's all these
cautions that you have, these lessons
395
00:20:23,546 --> 00:20:28,796
that you've learned from trying to improve
outcomes and get to higher ROI and all
396
00:20:28,796 --> 00:20:33,526
these steps that we talked about in this
age of AI, does it feel any different
397
00:20:33,646 --> 00:20:40,176
than, I don't know, the age of SaaS or any
kind of technologies beforehand in terms
398
00:20:40,176 --> 00:20:43,186
of your process or even the challenges?
399
00:20:44,186 --> 00:20:45,646
Jamie Rivero: It
certainly feels different.
400
00:20:45,646 --> 00:20:49,096
I think the more implementations
you go through, the more
401
00:20:49,096 --> 00:20:50,706
sales pitches you go through.
402
00:20:50,706 --> 00:20:56,726
I think that there's a sense of, I don't
know if jadedness is the right word.
403
00:20:57,356 --> 00:21:00,946
But as you go through these
different experiences, you learn,
404
00:21:01,306 --> 00:21:05,426
like, I went through a number of
very large software implementations
405
00:21:05,426 --> 00:21:06,706
over the last couple of years.
406
00:21:06,736 --> 00:21:11,326
And while they all panned out
at the end, for the most part, I
407
00:21:11,326 --> 00:21:13,286
did run into a number of hiccups.
408
00:21:13,776 --> 00:21:18,556
And for me, I've always tried to take
those setbacks as like lessons learned.
409
00:21:18,566 --> 00:21:24,886
So like now every time I go into another
software evaluation, I'm always like,
410
00:21:24,996 --> 00:21:28,261
I have in the back of my
head, learn this the hard way,
411
00:21:28,306 --> 00:21:29,706
make sure you do this better.
412
00:21:30,176 --> 00:21:34,636
And I always try to do a postmortem
anytime I do like an implementation
413
00:21:34,636 --> 00:21:37,066
of any sort, because I want
to understand not just from my
414
00:21:37,066 --> 00:21:39,676
perspective, but also what
my team has went through.
415
00:21:39,676 --> 00:21:42,236
What could we have done differently?
416
00:21:42,246 --> 00:21:43,606
What did we learn?
417
00:21:43,676 --> 00:21:45,536
What did we not vet properly?
418
00:21:46,066 --> 00:21:50,926
And then as we go through more and more
of these implementations, we're in a much
419
00:21:50,966 --> 00:21:57,456
better mindset and much stronger in terms
of hopefully really vetting them out
420
00:21:57,466 --> 00:21:59,996
better, but also being able to deliver
421
00:22:00,016 --> 00:22:02,696
exactly what we're intending to get.
422
00:22:03,826 --> 00:22:06,776
Thomas Kunjappu: Anything in particular
that I know it's every, depending on
423
00:22:06,776 --> 00:22:10,831
what kind of project and the vendor and
the context, it all can be very distinct.
424
00:22:10,831 --> 00:22:13,561
And you're talking about the processes
that if you have that in place, it's
425
00:22:13,561 --> 00:22:19,111
helpful, but any particular other
meta lessons or big ones that come to
426
00:22:19,111 --> 00:22:20,431
mind that you'd be willing to share?
427
00:22:20,961 --> 00:22:21,371
Jamie Rivero: Yeah.
428
00:22:21,371 --> 00:22:25,651
So I went through an experience
earlier this year with a payroll
429
00:22:25,661 --> 00:22:26,101
vendor.
430
00:22:26,601 --> 00:22:30,831
It was payroll HRS and
it was a great system.
431
00:22:31,511 --> 00:22:33,021
I still love it.
432
00:22:33,041 --> 00:22:38,111
the system the implementation process was
horrible and I learned a lot of lessons
433
00:22:38,111 --> 00:22:44,221
throughout it one of the caveats and every
HR person anytime you bring up payroll
434
00:22:44,221 --> 00:22:48,681
systems we all have gripes about all
of them there is not a perfect payroll
435
00:22:48,701 --> 00:22:55,691
hrs system out there but for me i had a
challenging implementation because there
436
00:22:55,691 --> 00:22:59,151
were a lot of things that were promised.
437
00:22:59,211 --> 00:23:03,781
And I was very smart about it in
terms of getting things in writing.
438
00:23:03,781 --> 00:23:07,131
Like I would not agree to sign the
contract until I got certain specifics
439
00:23:07,131 --> 00:23:11,231
in there because the certain specifics
were, they depended upon our business.
440
00:23:11,281 --> 00:23:14,241
And for me, like they
were major deal breakers.
441
00:23:14,251 --> 00:23:17,271
If you can't do this, then this
is not the software for us.
442
00:23:17,291 --> 00:23:22,891
And I should have known early on that this
implementation was not going to go well.
443
00:23:22,891 --> 00:23:24,261
And I was smart about it.
444
00:23:24,271 --> 00:23:26,821
So one of the things I've
learned in implementations is
445
00:23:26,831 --> 00:23:28,491
in any software agreements,
446
00:23:28,991 --> 00:23:30,951
don't pay a lot for implementation.
447
00:23:30,951 --> 00:23:35,081
Like oftentimes when they quote you,
they will throw like high numbers for
448
00:23:35,081 --> 00:23:38,171
this is our implementation fee, or
this is the cost of implementation.
449
00:23:38,191 --> 00:23:40,511
I've always negotiated
them down substantially.
450
00:23:40,511 --> 00:23:42,991
Because what I've learned is once
451
00:23:42,991 --> 00:23:46,331
you pay those big fees for
implementation, they have you on the hook.
452
00:23:46,951 --> 00:23:52,911
But if you pay a lot less, they have more
in the game than you do at that point.
453
00:23:52,931 --> 00:23:56,801
So it becomes easier from a
negotiating factor as well
454
00:23:56,801 --> 00:23:58,531
as trying to get stuff done.
455
00:23:59,081 --> 00:24:00,681
And with this payroll
456
00:24:00,681 --> 00:24:05,151
provider, there were a lot of things like
there were delays in terms of starting
457
00:24:05,191 --> 00:24:09,801
implementation, which our business was
dependent upon the system going live
458
00:24:09,801 --> 00:24:14,481
in January, because we had performance
reviews, there were benefits involved,
459
00:24:14,481 --> 00:24:16,351
like there were a lot of moving pieces.
460
00:24:16,381 --> 00:24:18,231
And they had assured me like, we're gonna,
461
00:24:18,771 --> 00:24:19,721
we're gonna go live.
462
00:24:19,721 --> 00:24:22,161
And I knew it's probably
not gonna trend that way.
463
00:24:22,181 --> 00:24:26,461
And it got worse as the implementation
went, was moving forward because
464
00:24:26,461 --> 00:24:29,711
it was like more and more things
were getting dropped on us.
465
00:24:29,771 --> 00:24:31,141
I'll give you a quick example.
466
00:24:31,151 --> 00:24:34,601
So we were in two countries, we're
in the United States and Canada.
467
00:24:34,941 --> 00:24:39,851
And one of the premises of this
software move was I wanted a payroll
468
00:24:39,851 --> 00:24:44,271
system that could do both US and
Canada in one system, rather than
469
00:24:44,271 --> 00:24:46,411
running two standalone programs.
470
00:24:46,951 --> 00:24:50,031
They assured me throughout the process,
we can do Canadian payroll, went
471
00:24:50,031 --> 00:24:52,821
through the demos, talked to a client.
472
00:24:52,881 --> 00:24:54,961
But one thing that wasn't
disclosed to us was that
473
00:24:54,961 --> 00:24:57,881
they couldn't pay Canadian
employees directly.
474
00:24:57,941 --> 00:24:59,301
They weren't set up yet.
475
00:24:59,691 --> 00:25:04,471
So we would have to export a file
out of the system, then move it
476
00:25:04,471 --> 00:25:07,721
to our bank, who would then pay
the Canadian employees directly.
477
00:25:08,121 --> 00:25:11,891
They dropped that on me, I guess,
four weeks when we were supposed
478
00:25:11,891 --> 00:25:13,861
to go live, like four weeks before.
479
00:25:14,341 --> 00:25:17,441
And I'm like, wait a minute, it's
not just I just send a file to
480
00:25:17,441 --> 00:25:18,961
the bank and then they just pay.
481
00:25:18,961 --> 00:25:22,131
There's a lot of stuff that's
involved in terms of that.
482
00:25:22,861 --> 00:25:27,431
Then it got to a point where I
actually had to delay the project.
483
00:25:27,431 --> 00:25:29,871
Like I had to stop it essentially
because there were a lot
484
00:25:29,871 --> 00:25:30,711
of things that were popping
485
00:25:30,711 --> 00:25:33,561
up that were like out of the
scope of the original agreement.
486
00:25:34,096 --> 00:25:36,311
Even in like the learning
management piece of it, they were
487
00:25:36,311 --> 00:25:38,041
trying to pass costs along to me.
488
00:25:38,041 --> 00:25:39,906
And I'm like, wait a minute,
I have in writing like that
489
00:25:39,971 --> 00:25:40,901
you were paying for this.
490
00:25:41,341 --> 00:25:44,081
So it got to a point where I had
to stop the project completely.
491
00:25:44,081 --> 00:25:47,941
And because we didn't spend that
much in the implementation, we had
492
00:25:47,941 --> 00:25:52,101
a lot of negotiating power because
they had so much more tied up into
493
00:25:52,101 --> 00:25:53,821
this implementation than we did.
494
00:25:54,171 --> 00:25:55,021
But it was a mess.
495
00:25:55,051 --> 00:25:56,161
I learned a lot from it.
496
00:25:56,171 --> 00:25:59,151
It was a great, I still
think it's a great system.
497
00:25:59,531 --> 00:26:05,386
But it taught me the importance of things
that we probably should have vetted
498
00:26:05,396 --> 00:26:09,726
better up front, as well as the importance
of getting certain things in writing.
499
00:26:11,276 --> 00:26:12,006
Thomas Kunjappu: Great points.
500
00:26:12,006 --> 00:26:16,916
And now we're really talking about
like contracting in that detail, right?
501
00:26:16,976 --> 00:26:18,306
Yeah, in a true partnership, right?
502
00:26:18,306 --> 00:26:21,836
There should be skin in the game
a little bit on both sides, right?
503
00:26:21,836 --> 00:26:23,376
It needs to be fair.
504
00:26:23,791 --> 00:26:28,616
And that's a great example of
something at surface level.
505
00:26:28,856 --> 00:26:31,536
And even at level two, the
answer is yes, we're aligned.
506
00:26:31,536 --> 00:26:35,256
But then, and even post-pilot, when
you're actually getting to an actual
507
00:26:35,446 --> 00:26:39,476
four weeks beforehand, you actually
learn something where there's so many
508
00:26:39,476 --> 00:26:42,806
assumptions that were like made that
was not, there was not alignment on
509
00:26:43,436 --> 00:26:45,426
or potentially was willfully hidden.
510
00:26:45,496 --> 00:26:46,066
I'm not sure.
511
00:26:46,526 --> 00:26:49,396
But these are the, yeah, like
all these pitfalls, but a common
512
00:26:49,396 --> 00:26:51,536
theme I'm sensing here is it
513
00:26:51,536 --> 00:26:54,676
really maps to your
business processes, right?
514
00:26:54,696 --> 00:26:57,316
You need to understand like
what is, what matters and
515
00:26:57,896 --> 00:26:59,296
doesn't matter to your business.
516
00:26:59,371 --> 00:27:01,131
I don't know if you had a great bank
517
00:27:01,131 --> 00:27:05,421
and it's an automated process to
just whatever it is you need to do
518
00:27:05,421 --> 00:27:07,911
to transfer the money and make
it happen, that's one thing.
519
00:27:07,911 --> 00:27:12,981
But you can't change banks
because of many other reasons.
520
00:27:13,011 --> 00:27:15,691
That leads you to a
black hole here, right?
521
00:27:15,691 --> 00:27:20,261
So it really is getting to as many
detailed levels of understanding
522
00:27:20,261 --> 00:27:25,001
about what really matters and you're
inflexible on versus what you could push
523
00:27:25,001 --> 00:27:26,931
forward on from a process perspective.
524
00:27:27,451 --> 00:27:32,386
Within this or many other projects,
what are your tools to bring
525
00:27:32,586 --> 00:27:34,406
skeptical leaders alongside?
526
00:27:34,566 --> 00:27:36,406
So let's say you've done your own math.
527
00:27:36,466 --> 00:27:36,726
You feel like this is a project that you
528
00:27:36,726 --> 00:27:36,746
want to move forward with, whatever it is.
529
00:27:36,746 --> 00:27:37,566
And you're looking've done your own math.
530
00:27:37,576 --> 00:27:39,856
You feel like this is a project
that like you want to move
531
00:27:39,866 --> 00:27:41,126
forward with whatever it is.
532
00:27:41,531 --> 00:27:45,526
And you're looking to bring in
it could be leadership or it
533
00:27:45,526 --> 00:27:47,276
could be the management team.
534
00:27:47,706 --> 00:27:48,636
How do you bring them along?
535
00:27:49,696 --> 00:27:50,086
Jamie Rivero: Yeah.
536
00:27:50,086 --> 00:27:54,576
So oftentimes whenever I'm
thinking or trying to solve a
537
00:27:54,576 --> 00:27:56,396
business problem, I'll oftentimes
538
00:27:56,396 --> 00:27:57,176
talk to you.
539
00:27:57,266 --> 00:27:58,766
I would talk to the executive team.
540
00:27:58,806 --> 00:28:03,756
Hey, we have this issue and really
try to get their candid perspective in
541
00:28:03,756 --> 00:28:09,096
terms of what the actual issues are,
show them that I fully understand what
542
00:28:09,096 --> 00:28:11,536
the business issues are, and really
543
00:28:18,326 --> 00:28:19,386
push back on it.
544
00:28:19,416 --> 00:28:24,486
And then I take that feedback,
and I'm gonna do my own research.
545
00:28:24,506 --> 00:28:29,066
And oftentimes, when I'm pitching certain
things, I'm already taking into account
546
00:28:29,086 --> 00:28:34,506
that skepticism or their concerns and
making sure that I'm addressing them
547
00:28:34,506 --> 00:28:39,086
so that they feel comfortable and
that I'm not dismissing them or trying
548
00:28:39,086 --> 00:28:41,336
to forge ahead without their buy-in.
549
00:28:41,336 --> 00:28:44,966
Like I at least want to make sure
that I take the time to address it.
550
00:28:45,446 --> 00:28:49,626
And I've found that's very helpful
in getting things pushed through
551
00:28:49,756 --> 00:28:51,116
and also finding advocates.
552
00:28:51,326 --> 00:28:54,461
Like certain times on the executive,
they're going to, there are certain
553
00:28:54,471 --> 00:28:56,031
people that are going to align with you.
554
00:28:56,031 --> 00:28:57,551
They're going to buy
into what you're doing.
555
00:28:57,551 --> 00:29:01,911
So having them help to push things
through, I find is very helpful,
556
00:29:01,911 --> 00:29:04,871
like getting people on your
team and getting them to buy in.
557
00:29:05,401 --> 00:29:08,701
Because when they start to see
like maybe certain other people
558
00:29:08,701 --> 00:29:10,191
that they have a lot of respect for
559
00:29:10,211 --> 00:29:15,891
also sold on this, I think it becomes
a lot easier to get people on board.
560
00:29:16,491 --> 00:29:19,486
And then also just making sure
that you include the people in
561
00:29:19,531 --> 00:29:21,101
the process who are skeptical.
562
00:29:21,161 --> 00:29:23,661
If you go back to them and you
address all their concerns and they're
563
00:29:23,661 --> 00:29:27,741
still skeptical, there's been times
where I've set calls up with certain
564
00:29:27,761 --> 00:29:30,241
implementation people or subject matter
565
00:29:30,241 --> 00:29:34,731
experts to flush out those concerns
and alleviate that if they're
566
00:29:34,731 --> 00:29:38,051
going to hold the process up for
moving forward with a solution.
567
00:29:39,221 --> 00:29:40,091
Thomas Kunjappu: Love those tips.
568
00:29:40,101 --> 00:29:43,876
So let's circle back to something
you brought up way up front, which
569
00:29:43,876 --> 00:29:48,841
was actually about how you think
that with AI technologies, there are
570
00:29:52,041 --> 00:29:55,821
some processes that you feel
like, especially in HR, you always
571
00:29:55,821 --> 00:29:58,241
want humans in the loop, right?
572
00:29:59,581 --> 00:30:01,741
So tell me a little bit about
how you think about this.
573
00:30:01,741 --> 00:30:06,821
How do you think about where,
how to bring in AI versus not?
574
00:30:08,121 --> 00:30:13,001
Jamie Rivero: So I think a lot of
the lower level tasks, they talk
575
00:30:13,011 --> 00:30:14,951
about AI a lot in talent acquisition.
576
00:30:14,951 --> 00:30:15,071
And
577
00:30:15,071 --> 00:30:16,081
I think it's super helpful.
578
00:30:16,081 --> 00:30:19,271
And that is one area that I've
definitely implemented AI with.
579
00:30:19,301 --> 00:30:19,641
But
580
00:30:20,201 --> 00:30:24,831
where I don't think it's a good idea is
where it's making final hiring decisions.
581
00:30:24,931 --> 00:30:28,701
So I think definitely having
it help through writing job
582
00:30:28,701 --> 00:30:30,311
descriptions, sorting through
583
00:30:30,311 --> 00:30:34,256
applicants, some of the candidate
communications in terms of
584
00:30:34,351 --> 00:30:37,191
scheduling interviews or sending
rejections, that type of stuff,
585
00:30:37,191 --> 00:30:38,591
I think is definitely helpful.
586
00:30:38,601 --> 00:30:43,951
But where I would never want to put AI
is like making final hiring decisions,
587
00:30:43,951 --> 00:30:48,841
because I feel like there's a lot that
goes into making a hiring decision.
588
00:30:48,841 --> 00:30:52,491
And I would never fully feel
comfortable like having technology
589
00:30:52,491 --> 00:30:53,811
just make that decision.
590
00:30:54,171 --> 00:30:57,511
Even like handling like sensitive
employee, like relations
591
00:30:57,511 --> 00:30:59,111
issues and stuff like that.
592
00:30:59,401 --> 00:31:03,781
I don't think AI technology
should be involved in.
593
00:31:03,811 --> 00:31:08,351
I also like anything with an ethical
gray area, like I would never.
594
00:31:09,251 --> 00:31:10,501
It's just me, like I just
595
00:31:10,501 --> 00:31:12,951
wouldn't feel comfortable
having AI technology.
596
00:31:12,951 --> 00:31:15,621
But I feel like it's very
valuable for a lot of
597
00:31:15,621 --> 00:31:20,171
those lower level, low value type
tasks and stuff like that, but also
598
00:31:20,171 --> 00:31:24,121
finding that balance because I feel
like i've seen it from employees
599
00:31:24,321 --> 00:31:26,191
where they get frustrated if they
600
00:31:26,201 --> 00:31:28,691
think something's an AI response.
601
00:31:28,751 --> 00:31:32,991
If they get an email from someone
and say they use ChatGPT or whatever
602
00:31:33,011 --> 00:31:35,491
to write it, it does not go well.
603
00:31:35,501 --> 00:31:36,021
I've also
604
00:31:36,021 --> 00:31:39,121
gotten pushback from employees that
are like, my performance review was
605
00:31:39,121 --> 00:31:41,591
written by ChatGPT instead of my manager.
606
00:31:41,611 --> 00:31:44,301
So like, I feel like you
got to find a balance.
607
00:31:45,681 --> 00:31:46,541
Thomas Kunjappu: Yes.
608
00:31:46,541 --> 00:31:50,021
And those are great examples
of the first one, the email
609
00:31:50,021 --> 00:31:51,061
depends on what the email is.
610
00:31:51,061 --> 00:31:53,881
But if it's like you're, you think you're
talking to a human about a particular
611
00:31:53,881 --> 00:31:58,121
job issue, and you feel like you get
a robot thing back unexpectedly, or
612
00:31:58,221 --> 00:32:01,661
obviously performance management,
that's something that is high stakes.
613
00:32:01,691 --> 00:32:04,901
And you want to, if you're going
through the trouble of going, having
614
00:32:04,901 --> 00:32:07,781
this process, you're doing it for some
reason, or if it's meaningless, maybe
615
00:32:07,781 --> 00:32:11,421
then, and go ahead, put in the AI in
it, but then why have the process?
616
00:32:11,571 --> 00:32:12,311
One might ask.
617
00:32:13,166 --> 00:32:14,166
So, right.
618
00:32:14,346 --> 00:32:14,696
Then,
619
00:32:17,236 --> 00:32:20,396
I just want to push you a little bit
more on these ethical kind of things.
620
00:32:20,396 --> 00:32:20,436
Even in performance reviews or
621
00:32:23,066 --> 00:32:28,466
in hiring decisions, what do you think
about AI technologies enabling you in
622
00:32:28,466 --> 00:32:33,836
the background to, I don't know, pull
in a bunch of scores and give you some
623
00:32:33,836 --> 00:32:36,216
context help make a hiring decision?
624
00:32:36,236 --> 00:32:41,186
Or help a manager pull in a bunch of
data around activities and time tracking
625
00:32:41,186 --> 00:32:47,551
information and performance 360 feedback
to give you a starting point upon which
626
00:32:47,571 --> 00:32:51,581
then the trained manager, the trained HR
person is supposed to take further action.
627
00:32:52,311 --> 00:32:55,411
Do you see risks even with
that kind of approach?
628
00:32:56,751 --> 00:32:59,421
Jamie Rivero: I'm actually
in support of a lot of that.
629
00:32:59,491 --> 00:33:04,521
I think where I see the risk is
where I see certain managers who
630
00:33:04,781 --> 00:33:06,501
that's what they're going to rely on.
631
00:33:06,531 --> 00:33:10,691
They don't want to think they're just
going to say, okay, this looks great.
632
00:33:10,691 --> 00:33:13,351
Or AI told me to make this decision.
633
00:33:13,351 --> 00:33:14,041
So I'm going to make it.
634
00:33:14,041 --> 00:33:17,271
So I think it, I think it just
gets into knowing your workforce,
635
00:33:17,271 --> 00:33:22,021
but also like training and the
education of your management team.
636
00:33:22,031 --> 00:33:25,616
But I do feel like there is a
lot of value in AI technology,
637
00:33:25,616 --> 00:33:30,296
especially I've done it where I'm
dumping data into an AI technology.
638
00:33:30,296 --> 00:33:34,286
And I'm like, summarize this, and it can
spit it out very quickly, much quickly
639
00:33:34,286 --> 00:33:38,326
than years ago, where I was spending a
ton of time trying to make the perfect
640
00:33:38,326 --> 00:33:40,446
summary or presentation on something.
641
00:33:41,136 --> 00:33:44,851
But yeah, I think just like the
education of the managers, knowing
642
00:33:44,891 --> 00:33:48,971
your workforce, certain workforces,
they're very innovative, very ahead
643
00:33:48,981 --> 00:33:50,781
when it comes to management development,
644
00:33:50,781 --> 00:33:51,331
stuff like that.
645
00:33:51,331 --> 00:33:55,291
And then there's others where you
probably need to spend some more time,
646
00:33:55,331 --> 00:33:57,851
like investing into that management team.
647
00:33:59,391 --> 00:34:02,191
Thomas Kunjappu: So then if you're
looking ahead, you, a fool's errand, but
648
00:34:02,211 --> 00:34:06,391
let's try it, Jamie, in the next like
two or three years, what do you think a
649
00:34:06,391 --> 00:34:09,271
future ready HR team looks like for you?
650
00:34:10,630 --> 00:34:15,110
Jamie Rivero: So I would say finding
that balance of like human centric
651
00:34:15,121 --> 00:34:20,371
leadership, I think that people
still crave that human connection.
652
00:34:20,371 --> 00:34:22,701
And that's what I hear
from a lot of employees.
653
00:34:22,721 --> 00:34:25,371
I don't think we should
fully walk away from that.
654
00:34:25,371 --> 00:34:28,241
So it's like finding that like mix.
655
00:34:28,650 --> 00:34:34,071
Also having the tech savviness, I
think technology is really valuable.
656
00:34:34,071 --> 00:34:37,511
And I think as HR professionals,
we need to embrace it.
657
00:34:37,821 --> 00:34:40,053
We need to not be scared
of it, not run away.
658
00:34:40,053 --> 00:34:40,860
away from it.
659
00:34:41,501 --> 00:34:45,460
And also just ensuring
that we're also changing.
660
00:34:45,460 --> 00:34:48,766
Like I've noticed I've been in the
workforce now for about 18 years.
661
00:34:49,081 --> 00:34:53,311
And I've noticed over the last 10
years, things have dramatically changed.
662
00:34:53,331 --> 00:34:57,771
And I also see a lot of
companies who are not adapting
663
00:34:57,791 --> 00:34:59,861
are not doing well financially.
664
00:34:59,861 --> 00:35:01,751
And I think that really speaks to it.
665
00:35:01,751 --> 00:35:06,371
And I think as HR professionals,
if we want to position ourselves
666
00:35:06,381 --> 00:35:10,511
to be leaders in our area or
industry, we need to embrace change.
667
00:35:10,571 --> 00:35:12,861
We need to stay on top of it.
668
00:35:13,111 --> 00:35:16,131
It's no longer you get your HR
certification and you're good.
669
00:35:16,271 --> 00:35:20,211
Every year I'm continually doing
professional development because
670
00:35:20,221 --> 00:35:22,271
things are changing so rapidly.
671
00:35:23,811 --> 00:35:24,321
Thomas Kunjappu: Absolutely.
672
00:35:24,321 --> 00:35:26,831
So then do you think there's, I
don't know, new skills that will
673
00:35:26,831 --> 00:35:34,121
be emergent even more or new titles
even, or a mix is the mix of an HR
674
00:35:34,271 --> 00:35:37,001
team in, is that like the skill sets
675
00:35:37,001 --> 00:35:39,746
does it get, does that
change a little bit as well?
676
00:35:39,746 --> 00:35:40,156
Do you think?
677
00:35:40,746 --> 00:35:43,666
Jamie Rivero: Yeah, I think
people analytics is huge.
678
00:35:43,666 --> 00:35:46,896
So like metrics was like the
big buzzword I remember for a
679
00:35:46,896 --> 00:35:48,056
number of years, but now it's
680
00:35:48,056 --> 00:35:50,106
switching to analytics, which
I think are so important.
681
00:35:50,116 --> 00:35:54,706
And I think that I'm seeing a
lot more technology type roles.
682
00:35:54,716 --> 00:36:00,096
So whether it's AI managers, project
management of AI product owners,
683
00:36:00,466 --> 00:36:04,296
that type of stuff, because it
does require a certain skillset
684
00:36:04,306 --> 00:36:08,016
to be able to evaluate, implement
these softwares and also run them.
685
00:36:08,036 --> 00:36:11,656
There's a number of HRIS softwares
where you actually need a team of
686
00:36:11,666 --> 00:36:13,886
people to run the day-to-day of them.
687
00:36:14,326 --> 00:36:18,926
So I'm seeing a lot more
technology-capable type roles
688
00:36:18,936 --> 00:36:21,256
hitting the market over the
last couple of years for sure.
689
00:36:21,256 --> 00:36:23,396
And I'm sure that's going
to continue to grow.
690
00:36:24,846 --> 00:36:25,156
Thomas Kunjappu: Great.
691
00:36:25,156 --> 00:36:28,586
So thank you for this a wonderful
conversation jamie we've been
692
00:36:28,641 --> 00:36:32,816
really going in detail to the
nitty-gritty of identifying a
693
00:36:32,816 --> 00:36:34,556
project on making sure that it
694
00:36:34,556 --> 00:36:38,426
actually aligns with the business
overall and then figuring out
695
00:36:38,556 --> 00:36:40,566
how to vet different vendors
696
00:36:40,586 --> 00:36:46,036
an roi case doing the math yourself
including and double checking things
697
00:36:46,116 --> 00:36:51,316
alongside vendors and managers all the way
before you actually can get some value.
698
00:36:51,326 --> 00:36:55,486
Thank you for sharing some of the
failures along the way or setbacks that
699
00:36:55,486 --> 00:36:59,316
help you get lessons and get stronger.
700
00:36:59,316 --> 00:37:02,046
And there's some great
negotiating tips in there as well.
701
00:37:02,466 --> 00:37:02,836
Yeah.
702
00:37:03,106 --> 00:37:04,976
Like everyone has to feel like
they have skin in the game, right?
703
00:37:04,976 --> 00:37:08,836
In a project that's involved
in trying to get it successful.
704
00:37:09,431 --> 00:37:14,901
Thank you again and for all the folks
out there who are future-proofing
705
00:37:14,911 --> 00:37:19,021
their own organizations and their own
hr functions i hope you found some
706
00:37:19,021 --> 00:37:25,391
value in this conversation and once
again we'll catch you on the next one.
707
00:37:26,251 --> 00:37:29,311
Thanks for joining us on this
episode of Future Proof HR.
708
00:37:29,551 --> 00:37:32,161
If you like the discussion, make
sure you leave us a five star
709
00:37:32,161 --> 00:37:35,041
review on the platform you're
listening to or watching us on.
710
00:37:35,461 --> 00:37:38,401
Or share this with a friend or colleague
who may find value in the message.
711
00:37:38,701 --> 00:37:43,651
See you next time as we keep our pulse on
how we can all thrive in the age on AI.