In this final episode of Access Undone, I try to outline the ways I would reverse the damage that has been caused in the last decade by the Department of Education and NCSE. I explore three solutions and argue that if all three were implemented, it would save the agencies from being part of the 21st century's greatest education scandal and, even possibly put them in the same definition of Ireland's most famous minister, Donagh O'Malley.

Welcome to access on done.

2

The collapse of special education.

3

I special podcast from unsharp dot Nash.

4

This is Simon Lewis.

5

A teacher and principal for over 20 years.

6

In this series, I look back over the

short history of how children with

7

additional needs have slowly but surely

been cast aside by the education system.

8

I argue that much like the crimes of the

Catholic church on children, where the

9

scandal of the 20th century, that how the

state is treating children with additional

10

needs will be the scandal of the 21st.

11

During the Aon debacle.

12

The department of education

run a number of webinars.

13

To explain the process to principals.

14

I attended one of them.

15

And I sat in my office, staring at my

zoom screen with over 30 of my colleagues.

16

There was a nice man and woman

from the department of education.

17

Who explained that there was a court

ruling that meant that schools would

18

now be responsible for filling out the

education profile for the Aon form.

19

He explained that they had run a pilot

in several schools and that everyone

20

was really happy with dot pirate.

21

And there was very

little workload involved.

22

He thanked us all for our cooperation.

23

When it came to question time.

24

I spoke up.

25

I explained I was one of the so-called

pilot schools and I told them how long

26

the form actually took to fill out.

27

Much longer than the 20 to

30 minutes he had advertised.

28

I explained that I had actually

surveyed several schools and none of

29

them were very happy at all with this.

30

I asked the room.

31

Had anyone else, any thoughts

on it or had they been involved?

32

It's a very odd feeling.

33

Seeing 30 sets of eyes looked

down after you say something.

34

And you just know.

35

They are letting you drown.

36

The guy from the department told

me that my complaint was the

37

first he'd heard about this.

38

He'd been to lots of schools in the pilot.

39

And that everyone.

40

He had spoken to.

41

I was happy.

42

Over the last few months.

43

I've charged.

44

It had the department of education and the

NCSE have slowly, but surely made things

45

worse for children with additional needs.

46

I argued that as soon as the

47

children that were hit the hardest.

48

And when we emerged from the

emergency these same children

49

remained rooted in austerity.

50

Where the resources that were taken

away from them were never returned.

51

The NCSE never criticized

the government for failing to

52

fund their service properly.

53

And in fact, their CEO at the

time, Teresa Griffin welcomed their

54

budget in 2012, which included

a 15% cut to resource hours.

55

Instead, they invested ways to

save money by cutting resources.

56

I am convinced the new Brunswick

model was dropped once they

57

realized it actually costs more

than what they already had in place.

58

The massive expansion of what

they call autism units without any

59

research into how they actually

benefit children and using them.

60

Nevermind the possible ethics of

putting children into something called

61

units and providing minimal support

for them when they are enrolled.

62

We also saw how the NCSE did everything

they could to rid themselves of any

63

responsibility to any individual

child through the set allocation

64

model and instead forced schools to

perform the miracle of the loaves

65

and fishes to resource children's

needs with ever decreasing supports.

66

When there plan to not have any details

of children risked being upended by

67

a court ruling, which would've seen

them forced to identify the needs of

68

children for the assessment of need.

69

Aided by their friends and the

department of education, as you heard,

70

just there, the representative bodies,

which we discussed in a previous

71

episode on the unions, which we also

discussed in a previous episode.

72

They managed to wangle their

way out when schools were gaslit

73

into doing the work for them.

74

In 2023, they, again, tried to pull the

wall over school's eyes by removing the

75

criteria for special allocation teaching

hours after it was revealed that they

76

couldn't get the data from the HSE.

77

Uh, small uprising from parent

groups, advocacy groups, and a few

78

teachers was again, gotten over

by the support of their friends.

79

Most infamously from the IPN who told

their own members how wrong they were.

80

Those inventing a new educational term.

81

Called quantum.

82

Which as I found funny, could be

defined as a unit of the smallest

83

amount of something, usually energy.

84

At the same time, the HSE

failed to meet the needs of

85

tens of thousands of children.

86

When it came to speech and language,

occupational therapy, mental health,

87

psychology, psychiatry, and so on.

88

And in many cases, the only service

that was available to any child with

89

additional needs was their school place.

90

As you can see the link between

the states treatment of women

91

and children in the 20th century

supported by an independent partner

92

in the form of the Catholic church.

93

And now the 21st century is treatment

of children and their families.

94

This time supported by

an independent body.

95

The NCSE the last decade to me is a

dark mark on our education history.

96

What's worse to me is that much like

the crimes of the 20th century, what

97

empowered the state and its partners

for treating children in the way they

98

did was compliance through silence.

99

People that spoke up were often ridiculed.

100

Isolated.

101

Ignored.

102

And told that they were

the only ones complaining.

103

And everyone.

104

else was happy.

105

However, despite the last decade, as

I said, at the end of the last episode

106

in 2024, the NCSE came out with a

process which they called new for

107

resourcing special needs assistance.

108

Right now they're rolling out the red

carpet for us explaining how it works.

109

Perhaps we're about to see the

seeds of hope for children with

110

additional needs from the NCSE.

111

I've reached the point of the

podcast now, where I feel I

112

need to offer some solutions.

113

If you've listened to this show for a few

years, you might remember an episode I did

114

shortly after the newest CEO of the NCSE.

115

John Carney took the reins of the NCSE.

116

I given that I'm just big, loud mouth

with a microphone and a few ideas.

117

I don't expect anything I

say to ever hit his desk.

118

But for those of you that are interested.

119

I'm going to give you an updated

summary of those thoughts.

120

I read back over my ideas.

121

And to be honest, I now disagree

with at least one thing I had

122

argued for a couple of years ago.

123

However, there's one idea.

124

That I really liked.

125

When I was discussing the,

special education, teaching

126

hours, the allocations, and

it was during a conversation.

127

I had on the radio with

Karen Cudahy in Newstalk.

128

Well to tell the truth.

129

It came from the national principal's

forum, in the first place, but Karen

130

coulda, he made a really good analogy.

131

It was a nice, simple idea.

132

Which emerged after those set allocations?

133

I just said, and 20, 23, and I had the

job of speaking to Karen Cudahy on news.

134

Talk about it.

135

And he came up with the analogy

that to me, made it make sense.

136

To the man on the street.

137

The national principal's forum

recommended that rather having all

138

the complicated, meaningless and an

accurate algorithms that decided what

139

special education resources to award

to children in schools, the principals

140

would simply out outline the supports

they required for the school year on.

141

These would be provided.

142

They would do this on the system called

pod, which is the primary online database.

143

We do like our acronyms and

whatever it was put in pod.

144

That's what we would get.

145

And Karen could, he asked me.

146

Would it be similar to how

people filed their tax returns?

147

Um, that is one decides

how much tax they declare.

148

And if something looks a little

bit fishy, Then it's investigated.

149

And to me, it was a really good analogy.

150

There are only 3000 primary schools in

Ireland and we have lots of data on them

151

already that is used for the allocations.

152

Their size and their dash

status are two indicators.

153

Literacy and numeracy scores are

terrible indicators, but I will

154

concede that they also exist and

they are the only other variables

155

now used for allocating resources.

156

The key variable missing are the

actual needs of children in the school.

157

The national principal's forum suggested.

158

The principals would simply input

what the children in the school need.

159

Now, before you poopoo this idea and

came, the principals would take the

160

Mickey out of the whole thing and

applied for ridiculous amounts of

161

hours, way beyond what they need.

162

Just hang on for a minute.

163

And hear me out.

164

I don't think a school principal should

be expected to just pick a number out

165

of the air and pop it in the system.

166

The NCSE already has a system

where a school inputs, the

167

level of need of all children.

168

When they're applying for a view of their

resources, there would be nothing that

169

difficult about using that documents to

give a reasonable calculation of what

170

hours each child's need equates to.

171

They've had that they had that

172

So let's say my current set allocation

in my school is about 200 hours a week.

173

That's go with $200 a week.

174

It isn't my allocation.

175

By the way, before you start going mad.

176

And let's say I filled out the

form on a calculated 205 hours, but

177

I decided to apply for 250 hours

a week for just for the crack.

178

Well, that should raise alarm bells.

179

If I applied for 250 hours, when

I should, when the calculation

180

said I should be a brown 205.

181

And I should expect to have

that evaluated and reviewed.

182

The document could be used to

calculate the allocation of SNS as

183

well as this, with the same system.

184

And in some ways it already does.

185

If I need an extra SNA or two

in my school, I have to seek

186

review of my current resources.

187

Ultimately the department and

the NCSE has seven years of

188

data on the Set allocations.

189

So it would be extremely easy to

get this system up and running.

190

With only 3000 schools and over

200 people working in the NCSE.

191

I think this could be managed

very easily and very quickly.

192

There were lots of

advantages to this model.

193

The main one is it takes a lot

of bureaucracy out of the system.

194

We don't need all those people

sitting in their offices and they

195

can now work directly with schools.

196

It also would stop the crazy horrible

system, which has been christened

197

the cluster games by principals.

198

This model would mean that schools

would receive an allocation to the

199

nearest full teacher and no more

fractions of hours will be necessary.

200

However that aside, I don't believe this

model alone would fix special education.

201

There's a reason why this

model isn't already in place.

202

And this is because we already

know the state and the NCSE is

203

not providing enough supports to

children with additional needs.

204

It is likely to cost the giving

children, exactly what they need.

205

We'll be more than double of

what they're giving already.

206

We need to look at ways to

systematically alter the education

207

system insofar as possible.

208

So you're going to have

to hear me at this one.

209

Too, but I think we might have.

210

Maybe too many teachers and SNS

working in special education right now.

211

Now, hopefully you haven't spelt your

hot cup of coffee all over yourself.

212

Hearing that did that big mouth Lewis,

just say we've too many teachers and

213

SNS after everything he said about

not having enough supports in schools.

214

Sorry for shouting.

215

I'm getting onto myself.

216

Anyway, let me reverse a little before

I go on and get you back to your coffee.

217

We probably don't have too many per se.

218

But we have too many working in

contexts that they shouldn't be.

219

I believe we're actually missing another

profession within our profession.

220

Most developed countries have these as

standard in their classrooms these days.

221

And that position.

222

Is the teaching assistant position

or the TA, as it seems to be known in

223

most other countries that have them.

224

What is a teaching

assistant you might ask.

225

And how is it different to a

special education teacher or

226

a special needs assistant?

227

Well, the teaching assistants is someone

who is the second adult in a classroom.

228

Who supports the teacher with all of the

things that a PSAT or an SNA doesn't do.

229

For example, a teaching assistant

can sit with a group of children

230

in the classroom and help at work.

231

A teaching assistant can sit outside

the classroom with a child who has

232

maybe has some sensory needs and needs a

little bit of time out of the classroom.

233

A teaching assistant can cover

the class for a very short time.

234

If the teacher is on their break or is

talking to a child that outside of the

235

classroom or sorting out an incident that

happened on yard, a teaching assistant can

236

take care of display, work photocopying,

and so on in a way they are the position

237

that the SNA originally was a general

second pair of hands in the classroom.

238

The SNA position has become

specialized on children's care needs.

239

So we need the teaching assistant to

look after the non-car needs of children.

240

I feel so strongly about this, that

if someone was to ask me the first

241

thing I would do, if I were the

minister of education, if I had a

242

magic wand, Well, you know what?

243

My first one would be to

separate church and state, but

244

my number two would actually be.

245

A teaching assistant in every classroom.

246

I really mean now my second thing that

I would ask for, if I was a minister

247

for education will be to have a

teaching assistant in every classroom.

248

The impact of a teaching assistant in

every classroom, I would argue we'll

249

do more for children with additional

needs than any other measure, except of

250

course, separation of church and state.

251

But that is for another day.

252

And honestly, I do believe the separation

of church and state would have a massive

253

impact on special education in Ireland.

254

Anyway, having teaching assistants would

allow special needs assistants, have the

255

time to upskilled to be able to offer

basic care services such as OT and SLT.

256

I really realize this is in the

plans for S and A's from the NCSE

257

already, but I can't see where they

will get the time to do these things.

258

Without someone like a teaching assistant

to take care of a lot of what used

259

to be known as secondary care needs.

260

You might think could be done.

261

But I have another bit of secret

sauce to not only pulling the NCS.

262

I E out of the Meyer, this

step will probably have a

263

massive effect on the H S E.

264

If you talk to most infant teachers in

the last couple of years and ask them,

265

what is the biggest issue you face?

266

They will likely tell

you one of two things.

267

One is a huge speech and language issue.

268

And the other is anxiety.

269

And this is where wraparound

services need to be on site.

270

There are several countries where

it is entirely normal to have an

271

onsite psychologist in the school.

272

I went to Finland last year and I went

to a small school of around 200 pupils.

273

They had a psychologist two days a

week, shared the bigger school nearby

274

of about 300 pupils who had the

psychologist for the other three days.

275

Most finished schools have full-time

psychologists, social workers on nurses.

276

And just in case you're rolling

your eyes at the relieving.

277

Even Scandinavian, loving that

you seem to hear all about why

278

is it always the Scandinavians?

279

Get it rice.

280

There are other places provinces

in Spain and the Netherlands also

281

have this as standard and actually

sometimes better than Finland setup.

282

Can you imagine the positive

impact on Irish primary schools?

283

If we had these now basic services, I

think about all those pilots going on

284

in certain counties, which simply need

to be rolled out to all primary schools.

285

I do understand that like Finland,

we have a huge amount of small

286

rural schools, but Finland managers

very well with clusters of schools

287

sharing these wraparound services.

288

And if we had these people in our schools,

I can guarantee you, you would see the

289

waiting lists for therapies, counseling,

psychiatry, dropping to manageable levels.

290

Very quickly.

291

I would argue we would

sort had so many issues.

292

We would end up saving more money than

we currently spend dealing with the

293

issues when children get older, such

as the impact of early school, leaving,

294

teenage mental health and so on.

295

I think the NCSE could, uh, would be

well capable of managing a system like

296

this, the school inclusion model, which

they were thinking of promoting a few

297

years ago was something like this.

298

Their therapies pilot was happening

in Wicklow ankle dare until COVID

299

times, and these were the, and

this was the seeds of this idea.

300

I'm not really suggesting anything

particular wild here, anything I've

301

said here, I think is pretty sensible

and so much maybe conservative.

302

However, at the moment, the

NCSE isn't quite there yet.

303

However, since the Starship recording

this podcast, they look like they

304

might be starting to sow the seeds.

305

A few weeks ago, the NCSE published

the revision of the guidelines for

306

schools applying for an SNA review.

307

And to be honest.

308

It's not that it's very different

to what was there before.

309

In fact, it's not very different at all.

310

But it's how it's being rolled out.

311

Isn't really that bad.

312

And I was very, very early days,

but if this is the beginning of

313

things to come, it is possible that

the scandal of the last gate decade

314

may be on its way to being fixed.

315

Of course, there is a very long

way to go on the NCSE structures

316

are still quite fractious.

317

For example, if you're applying for SCT

supports and SNA supports, you have to

318

deal more or less with two completely

different sections of the NCSE who won't

319

know a single thing about each other.

320

They need to untangle the layers of

bureaucracy that they built over the last

321

decade with all of the office staffs.

322

I get them out front

facing around the country.

323

However, these already signs

do look slightly positive.

324

The question is how long will

it take for the unraveling and

325

rebuilding to take to happen?

326

This episode is going out just before the

20, 24 general that action and whatever

327

party is in charge of education and

whatever minister falls into the role.

328

I was special education.

329

If this continues to exist, I hope it

is a row that is taken very seriously

330

with a decent minister who genuinely

cares for children with additional needs.

331

I would hate for it to be given

to someone who sees it as simply

332

a platform for a sexier portfolio.

333

I believe the minister who manages

to fix special education will be

334

held with the same celebrations

as we do for the likes of dun MRT.

335

You brought in free second

336

He is still widely considered to

be the best minister for education

337

in the history of the state.

338

So the question for the next minister

for education is will they do a donor?

339

Or will they like so many before them

stick with the compliance of silence

340

and the destruction of soundbites.

341

As for the NCRC, after a decade of error,

parable damage that was done to children

342

and those working with them will the

seeds, they just planted continue to grow.

343

There's so many people I'd like to thank

for their support in writing this series.

344

And it's probably appropriate.

345

If not disappointingly predictable.

346

That I can't tell you their names.

347

The people that contacted

me, contacted me anonymously.

348

I just fear for what might

happen if they went public.

349

And in some ways for this series,

I was simply the messenger.

350

The onshore.net podcast is written

and produced by me, Simon Lewis.

351

If you'd like to hear more of my thoughts

on primary education in Ireland, you

352

should subscribe to my maiden mist

on Shaw dot Nash slash subscribe.

353

If you've enjoyed the podcast, please

consider reviewing it on your favorite

354

podcast player, as it will help

other people find it more easily.

355

Until next time.

356

Thanks for listening.

357

And we'll see you again soon.