This episode is one about courage. The courage to show up as the leader you want to be. The courage to say the things that need to be said. Leaders in high performing teams, leaders with impact, have that courage - even if it is uncomfortable and messy and doesn’t always go to plan.
I’m delighted to speak with Sharon Amesu, an expert in building courage in the workplace. We talk about:
If you want to transform your leadership impact book a free consultation call with me
Want to know the secret of great leaders? In Leaders with impact we'll be exploring what makes an impactful leader; sharing stories of success and strategies that set them apart.
If you are ambitious for your organisation but are struggling to identify what you can do differently as a leader to deliver the right improvements, then hit subscribe to learn how you can get clear on your strategy, implement some self-leadership and connect with those you serve.
New episodes are released every fortnight.
If you enjoyed the episode please leave a review on Apple podcasts (or your app of choice) and let me know what you thought on LinkedIn or instagram.
I’ll be back with the next episode in two weeks so in the meantime remember to sign up to my newsletter to get notified of new episodes, guest appearances and further insights on how to lead with impact.
Today's episode is one about courage, the courage to
Unknown:show up as the leader you want to be courage to say the things
Unknown:that need to be said. Leaders in high performing teams leaders
Unknown:with impact have that courage, even if it is uncomfortable,
Unknown:messy and doesn't always good to plan. I'm Lee Griffith
Unknown:communication strategist, executive coach and all around
Unknown:champion of leaders who shun the old school stereotypes. I'm here
Unknown:to help you get clear on your strategy, implement some self
Unknown:leadership and connect with those who serve through your
Unknown:communications so that you can deliver improved organizational
Unknown:performance, engagement and reputation sign up to my
Unknown:newsletters to receive even more useful insights into how to be
Unknown:an impactful leader. You can also find out how I can support
Unknown:your organization to better connect with the people it
Unknown:serves. Visit Sundayskies.com To find out more.
Unknown:In today's episode, I'm delighted to speak with Sharon
Unknown:MSU. An expert in building courage in the workplace. We
Unknown:talk about how organizations can change culture, tackle bias,
Unknown:build inclusive and diverse boards, and the inner work
Unknown:leaders need to do to embrace and make change happen. It's one
Unknown:that will get you thinking for sure. Enjoy.
Unknown:So Sharon, thank you so much for joining us on the leaders with
Unknown:impact podcast, we're delighted to have you here today. You're a
Unknown:workplace courage consultant, tell me what that entails. So
Unknown:what we understand from what I understand from years of working
Unknown:with organizations, and thinking about the various thought
Unknown:leaders, both past and present, to reflect on what it takes for
Unknown:us to be able to get the best out of our people in our
Unknown:organizations, for people to be able to articulate their views
Unknown:for them to be innovative, for them to be high performing, be
Unknown:the best that they can be, and do the best that they can is
Unknown:that it requires them to be able to raise their hands above the
Unknown:parapet, and almost at times risk getting things wrong. And
Unknown:the only way that we're able to do that, individually and
Unknown:collectively, is when we're willing to be courageous, when
Unknown:we're willing to step outside of those zones of comfort, and take
Unknown:the risks. And say even if I'm wrong, I'll still try. It's
Unknown:those who will have the attitude, the mindset to go
Unknown:again, and not allow fear of rejection, fear of ridicule, to
Unknown:determine whether or not they'll take the chance. And what
Unknown:underpins all of that, therefore, is courage. It's me,
Unknown:Angelou, who said that people forget what you say they'll
Unknown:forget what you do, or they'll never forget how you made them
Unknown:feel. And she also said that courage is the greatest of all
Unknown:of the virtues that you can't practice any of the other
Unknown:virtues, whatever they might be, you're not able to practice any
Unknown:of them. If you don't have courage, they're willing to take
Unknown:the risk. And in a time where what we need now more than ever
Unknown:is, is great innovation we want we need people who are willing
Unknown:to wrestle with the knotty, challenging issues that every
Unknown:organization is facing, we have to face into what's often
Unknown:described as VUCA, which is volatility and uncertainty,
Unknown:complexity and ambiguity, when we don't have the stable ground
Unknown:that we used to be able to stand on the predictability of the
Unknown:business landscape of the workplace futures and all of
Unknown:those things that helped us just to be able to perhaps walk with
Unknown:greater confidence, we have to find something a resolution
Unknown:within us that enables us to step into the unknown. And for
Unknown:me, it's courage. And that's courage in relation to a
Unknown:conversation that we have, are we willing to lean into those
Unknown:areas that can be taxing and polarizing? Are we willing to
Unknown:bring challenge where we see things are not quite going
Unknown:right, that there's a direction of travel that's not conducive
Unknown:to our growth? Or are we willing to face opposition and where
Unknown:there may be dissents to our view still hold our own? So
Unknown:workplace courage is all about that. How do we create cultures
Unknown:within our organization that are underpinned by courage where
Unknown:people are able to thrive, prosper, engage and really
Unknown:advanced personally and professionally? There's so much
Unknown:there that I want to unpack. How did you get to the point that
Unknown:you're at where that's your focus, because you've had quite
Unknown:an interesting career. It came largely from personal
Unknown:experience, as is often the case with these things need So as
Unknown:you've mentioned, my career started in law. But before that,
Unknown:what drew me into law in the first place was I grew up during
Unknown:the 1970s
Unknown:His 1980's. And during that time, in the UK, there was a lot
Unknown:of civil unrest, a lot of communities in particular, the
Unknown:black community were facing marginalization exclusion, they
Unknown:were facing significant disadvantage, discrimination.
Unknown:And what I witnessed, which has never left me was the resolve
Unknown:among those who are leaders without titles in the
Unknown:communities rising up and bring together their collective voice
Unknown:in the face of opposition, of obstruction, and obstacles, to
Unknown:speak truth to power, irrespective of consequence,
Unknown:because they had some grounded deep within them as to what was
Unknown:right and what was fair and what was just. And I grew up under
Unknown:that, in particular, my dad was a community activist, a social
Unknown:convener, and he was a prominent figure in my life and observing
Unknown:him, and seeing him speak to those who are leading in the
Unknown:education system and bring challenge to the way that in
Unknown:particular black boys were being treated in the education system
Unknown:back in the 1970s, and 80s. And in fact, in reality, he, it
Unknown:still persists today. But I saw courage. I saw individuals like
Unknown:him, and there were others alongside him, who had the sense
Unknown:of assuredness about them, that even though there were Goliath
Unknown:that they were facing, they had a sense of knowing who they are,
Unknown:that they were willing to do what needed to be done. Even if
Unknown:there was a cost to them. It was this ability to step over the
Unknown:inevitable fear, whatever that might have been reputation, and
Unknown:financially, whatever it might have been, they were willing to
Unknown:step over that to do the right thing and do what needed to be
Unknown:done. It was that that awareness, that early awareness,
Unknown:that really brought me into the legal sector where of course,
Unknown:courage is needed in practice extensively, because you'll be
Unknown:facing opponents who might be more senior to you. Certainly my
Unknown:experience was as a black woman in the profession being a
Unknown:minority on at least two fronts in terms of gender and race. And
Unknown:so having the ability to tackle stuff like impostor syndrome,
Unknown:and the fear of using your voice in a way as an advocate, which
Unknown:may attract some ridicule in the courtroom, or in the Rubin room,
Unknown:or whatever it might be, to be able to stand and hold your own,
Unknown:I had to draw on something. And what I often found myself
Unknown:drawing on in order to ground myself encouraged with those
Unknown:stories that I've just relayed to you looking back at those,
Unknown:those for me, matriarchs and patriarchs who are able to stand
Unknown:and hold their own, and courage. Therefore, I began through my
Unknown:own evolution. But then, as I began to work with organizations
Unknown:and coach leaders, who would often be leaders without
Unknown:authority, Lee, so they'd have a title, but no one would be
Unknown:listening to them, because then they lacked a sense of
Unknown:credibility and gravitas. Because they lacked courage.
Unknown:Oftentimes, they weren't willing to hold the courageous
Unknown:conversations, they weren't willing to manage performance,
Unknown:perhaps or were a member of staff was underperforming, and
Unknown:it was having an impact and other people on the team, the
Unknown:manager or leader was not willing to have the necessary
Unknown:conversation because they feared the the inputs and the impact of
Unknown:that. So I just began to notice and see these threads emerge and
Unknown:ask myself the question What does underpin high performance
Unknown:cultures or people being able to thrive? What does make for a
Unknown:good lead? What are the characteristics? What are the
Unknown:traits and all roads lead to courage? It's as though when we
Unknown:look at integrity. So if we were to ask for a list of
Unknown:characteristics of any good leader, we would point to no
Unknown:doubt, despite sometimes what we see in modern society of
Unknown:leadership would still point to fundamentally things like
Unknown:honesty, right, would point to integrity,
Unknown:would point to accountability. All of these whatever
Unknown:characteristical trait we would describe would then go on by
Unknown:extension to ask ourselves, then how do we do that? How do they
Unknown:manifest that? And at the heart of that each and every one of
Unknown:those will be courage. As Mayor Angelou says, It takes courage
Unknown:to be honest, because it may well be that you'll expose
Unknown:yourself to a weakness or vulnerability. It takes courage
Unknown:to be have integrity, because it may well be that you're
Unknown:wrestling with two opposing views. And in fact, behind the
Unknown:scenes as it were, no, Amin know the truth of something. But it
Unknown:takes courage to do the right thing to it takes courage to be
Unknown:transparent, and really be willing to hold your hands open
Unknown:and say here are here's the reality of what's going on.
Unknown:Because always there is the risk of the well, is this going to be
Unknown:damaging of my reputation? Is this going to impact us
Unknown:financially? Is this going to impact my future career, etc,
Unknown:those will all be considerations that every single leader will
Unknown:have a no doubt having a daily basis. But what I see I've
Unknown:witnessed it personally, professionally. And I see it now
Unknown:through my work is the leaders who are willing to be and I call
Unknown:it competent courage. It's something I've really gleaned
Unknown:from a brilliant author who wrote a book called choosing
Unknown:courage, and essentially says courage is not just this sense
Unknown:of speaking at will what comes to mind without any filter, and
Unknown:just doing whatever I want, without any consideration of how
Unknown:it impacts other people far from it. Courage is considered true
Unknown:courage is considered. It is about measuring, evaluating,
Unknown:reflecting on the risk, and then having regard to that, then
Unknown:taking action. Now, of course, that takes that's a contrast to
Unknown:those immediate acts of heroic courage, right? Where you've got
Unknown:people, someone who will see a child in the street, and a car
Unknown:is about to go toward them, and then they quickly run over and
Unknown:they lift them off and save the day. All right, so that's not
Unknown:there's not much analysis going on there, if any, it's
Unknown:instinctive, but the reality is Lee, that 98.8% of the acts of
Unknown:courage that take place are not those heroic acts. It's the
Unknown:everyday acts of being true to yourself, of speaking truth, to
Unknown:power, of being truly authentic, in how you show up at work.
Unknown:Those are daily acts, and those acts of considered competent
Unknown:courage are the ones that require us to have pause,
Unknown:reflect and really think about, are we going to step over that
Unknown:that line of fear? And do what needs to be done and make the
Unknown:decision that needs to be made? Yeah, there's so much synergy
Unknown:with the leaders I work with, because similarly, we're looking
Unknown:at how do they bring their selves, their full selves into
Unknown:an organization and perhaps fight against those stereotypes
Unknown:and the old school way of leadership that still prevail in
Unknown:a lot of organizations and still prevail, particularly I work
Unknown:with with public sector, and you know, we hear all sorts coming
Unknown:out of some of those organizations. And we look at
Unknown:how they can communicate and connect and take people with
Unknown:them. But it means for them to do that they've got to build an
Unknown:earn trust, which comes from that point that you're saying
Unknown:the courage to do things differently and to do things
Unknown:that feel correct and authentic to them? Absolutely. Absolutely.
Unknown:And that's the daily challenge, isn't it? Of Yeah, any, any
Unknown:leader who is worth their salt, they will, who is leading
Unknown:essentially, they will face daily challenges that they are
Unknown:confronted with, which draws on their ability to stand and do
Unknown:the right thing. And those roads, that the opportunities
Unknown:for us to do the wrong thing, avails itself to everyone
Unknown:throughout the day. And it takes courage to do the right thing.
Unknown:Yeah, yeah, completely. So today, we absolutely get to
Unknown:explore all of this in more detail, and also maybe help get
Unknown:some practical things that people who are listening can
Unknown:take forward. And I want to explore a bit around the topic
Unknown:of diversity in senior leadership as well. And this
Unknown:thought around tackling bias and discrimination in the workplace,
Unknown:because I know that's something that you're really passionate
Unknown:about as well. And I suppose I want to start from the point of
Unknown:acknowledging that it can be a really difficult subject for
Unknown:people to raise and talk about, they might feel uncomfortable or
Unknown:scared about saying or doing the wrong thing. And that backlash
Unknown:that comes when when they do and it doesn't necessarily need to
Unknown:be just about diversity issues. You know, the thing you're
Unknown:talking about courage, it could be anything that they're trying
Unknown:to challenge the status quo, is that fear of backlash and saying
Unknown:and doing the wrong thing. And I suppose I come from a point of,
Unknown:we need to have messy conversations and I completely
Unknown:acknowledge probably in the space of this, this conversation
Unknown:that you and I have in that I'm going to not word things very
Unknown:well or be a bit clumsy in my approach, but I'm
Unknown:kind of happen, happy to, you know, be put back in and
Unknown:corrected or, you know, at least I'm having that conversation.
Unknown:And I think we've that courage breeds comfortableness in in
Unknown:people to feel that they can say something without fear of what
Unknown:might happen as a result. So what's your advice, I suppose to
Unknown:leaders who perhaps are avoiding the difficult topics, whatever
Unknown:they might be, I always begin with the basic understanding of
Unknown:human behavior. And sometimes in these conversations, Lee, we
Unknown:lose sight of the fact that there is a fundamental humanity
Unknown:in me, and there's one in you. And that then helps us to
Unknown:appreciate what are the types of things that helps us to build
Unknown:good relationships with anyone else in our life?
Unknown:Well, one, there is a sense of patience, there is interest,
Unknown:genuine interest, there's genuine care. And we are able
Unknown:individually to discern when someone's genuinely interested
Unknown:in us when they genuinely care. We have an appreciation and
Unknown:awareness of whether is good intention toward us. Why does
Unknown:that matter? Because where those are in existence, that the sense
Unknown:that someone cares for me, that they have good intentions toward
Unknown:me, that they that between us we have that they listen, and then
Unknown:there is empathy between us, then when that person gets
Unknown:things wrong, which inevitably, they will, because back to that
Unknown:humanity point, there are none among us who are perfect, there
Unknown:is a certain level of grace, and there is a certain level of
Unknown:leeway, that just exists in the relationship that enables us to
Unknown:be able to accommodate each other's foibles and failings.
Unknown:When I look at my own personal relationships, my husband, my
Unknown:children, we say things to each other, and not intentionally,
Unknown:but sometimes there may be a comment mark, which may be
Unknown:slightly off, there is a relationship between us, which
Unknown:means that they're able to come back to me say I didn't actually
Unknown:like that statement. Like that comment, or vice versa. I know
Unknown:you didn't intend that. But here's how it impacted me. What
Unknown:it means is because there is this safety that we have created
Unknown:between us, I have greater confidence that I'm able to
Unknown:speak and know that if I'm saying something that might
Unknown:cause offence, there is sufficient mileage between us
Unknown:relationship capital between us that I can trust that they'll
Unknown:come and speak to me and they'll raise that issue, and vice
Unknown:versa. And for the large part that's not articulated that
Unknown:there's no no long conversation, what is their relationship
Unknown:capital between us, etc. But we essentially know through the
Unknown:time that we built relationship, we spent time with each other,
Unknown:we have conversations, we get to know each other's triggers, etc.
Unknown:We have built our communication to the point where there is
Unknown:safety, safety for candor, and vulnerability and honesty. We've
Unknown:created the conditions for that. So my first point that I would
Unknown:say to leaders is build good relationships around you, with
Unknown:people that you need to have honest conversations with so
Unknown:often, there is this sense that we we can just that the sense of
Unknown:impairment and fear is most definitely understood Lee, I get
Unknown:that, in particular in a time of canceled culture.
Unknown:And I think sometimes the volatility in our public sphere
Unknown:can be so divisive, it means that people fall into paralysis
Unknown:and don't say anything. If in doubt, I would say it's best not
Unknown:to oftentimes, especially were, in particular in social media as
Unknown:opposed to general relationships, because social
Unknown:media is just not the platform to be outing views that you are
Unknown:either not clear will be polarizing or have the potential
Unknown:to be polarizing. And I always advise leaders to be careful
Unknown:about how they articulate their courage in those sorts of
Unknown:platforms. But coming into the workplace, building
Unknown:relationships with your colleagues, those colleagues who
Unknown:are different, diverse to you in whatever form whether it be the
Unknown:protected characteristics of the equalities act in the UK, or the
Unknown:plethora of other forms of diversity. Find
Unknown:Finding out about different people's experiences,
Unknown:understanding their world, taking the time to be genuinely,
Unknown:humbly curious, having good intentions in that all of those
Unknown:create the conditions for people to be able to explore, and have
Unknown:candid, honest, courageous conversations.
Unknown:When it comes to the issue, for example of bias, as you just
Unknown:referenced, that that is something that exists in all of
Unknown:us. It's a part of, of the human condition, and cognition. So
Unknown:it's who we are. And it's by necessity, all right, there's
Unknown:lots of research, which points to the fact that having bias
Unknown:helps us to be able to make decisions more quickly. So we're
Unknown:not having to process the millions of pieces of data that
Unknown:we're receiving constantly, it helps us to have those shortcuts
Unknown:to decision making. So they're necessary. What becomes
Unknown:problematic is when those quick unconsidered subconscious
Unknown:decisions, as it were started to be detrimental to other groups,
Unknown:whatever those groups might be. And that's where we need to
Unknown:really question that, we have to engage in conversations around
Unknown:this. Because if we don't, the situation and problem does not
Unknown:go away, it simply becomes more embedded. And the paralysis that
Unknown:I often see around this, which is, it's too scary to talk
Unknown:about, I don't know if I'm going to get it wrong, I don't know if
Unknown:I'm going to cause offence leads people to and therefore I'm not
Unknown:going to talk about it. Meanwhile, this thing is these
Unknown:differences, these contentions, these issues, the data around
Unknown:discrimination, harassment, and so on, they still sit there not
Unknown:being dealt with. And also frustration begins to emerge for
Unknown:those disenfranchised and marginalized groups whose issues
Unknown:are not being addressed. So it doesn't go away. And therefore,
Unknown:the question is, how do we deal with it? Not should we deal with
Unknown:it. And it starts with having really good relationships,
Unknown:building strong relationships, communicating, you'd appreciate
Unknown:that league, communicating good intention, being consistent in
Unknown:that. And then over time, that builds trust, how you're able to
Unknown:have that open dialogue? Yeah. You touched on the thing around
Unknown:everyone having bias and I actually I interviewed Sharon
Unknown:Carter, who's the Chief Executive of hexagon housing for
Unknown:a previous episode of the podcast, and we had this same
Unknown:conversation around everyone has had some form of bias. And
Unknown:actually, the key is you bringing that awareness to
Unknown:yourself around how that's influencing your behaviors and
Unknown:your decision making. I know that's something that you work
Unknown:with organizations on a day to day basis. So how do leaders
Unknown:become more attuned, I suppose, to those biases that might be at
Unknown:play. There's a really interesting book that I came
Unknown:across recently in the title is called Slow looking, the
Unknown:author's name escapes me what it's called Slow looking. And it
Unknown:really, the author invites us to treat our lives and our
Unknown:relationships and our world, like it would like we're in an
Unknown:exhibition.
Unknown:And we walk through, and when we go into an exhibition, or a
Unknown:museum, or whatever it might be, we pay close attention we
Unknown:observe, we start to notice, because we've slowed down our
Unknown:pace, or we've taken the time to pay attention, we start to zoom
Unknown:in to things that we would otherwise miss. So if you can
Unknown:imagine the contrast between going to an art exhibition, and
Unknown:alternatively, simply rushing through to catch a tube, train,
Unknown:or capture training, you're just rushing the images at the train
Unknown:station, but you're you're getting your train, you're
Unknown:you're not really paying attention to anything but
Unknown:heading with a beeline right to your train, there's a different
Unknown:you're taking the time you're taking pause. I would say that
Unknown:the same applies really to how we become aware of our biases,
Unknown:we start to pay attention. We start to notice how we made
Unknown:decisions and ask ourselves questions about how we've made
Unknown:those decisions, such as would I have made the decision like this
Unknown:if the person had different characteristics? So for example,
Unknown:if I'm making a decision about a male colleague, when I made the
Unknown:decision if it was a female colleagues, same decision, or if
Unknown:it's a young person, would I have made the decision, same
Unknown:decision if it was an older person, or if it's a white
Unknown:colleague, would I have made the same decision if
Unknown:It was a colleague of a different ethnicity or race.
Unknown:Yes. So start asking ourselves those questions. Another really
Unknown:useful approach to this is to surround ourselves with other
Unknown:views or the diverse perspective, because so often
Unknown:what we can do is we make decisions on our own in
Unknown:isolation. We are almost like a confirmation bias we are, we're
Unknown:clear that we are right, because all of the evidence in our heads
Unknown:points the fact that we are. So we tend to believe ourselves.
Unknown:And when we've made a decision, we believe it's right. And
Unknown:that's why also I for example, value, and this is why I suspect
Unknown:we have when we're recruiting, we'll have a panel why, because
Unknown:simply having the perspective of one person making the decision
Unknown:about who should be recruited in an organization where, for
Unknown:example, it's a larger organization, then there is a
Unknown:sense of bringing a range of perspectives around the table
Unknown:that that we can discuss, and we can mull, and we can reason
Unknown:together to see what is out, are we seeing the same thing?
Unknown:Are there certain traits that I've missed that you have, you
Unknown:have seen, et cetera. So there is sort of a proverb which says
Unknown:that there is wisdom in the Council of many. And so sense
Unknown:checking gauging with others, here is what I'm thinking of
Unknown:doing. What do you think of that, and, and not as well,
Unknown:simply having that group be made of people who are like you,
Unknown:because otherwise, to some degree, whilst there's always
Unknown:many forms of diversity, the danger is Lee, that you're
Unknown:simply working within asking the opinion of people who think like
Unknown:you who have a shared background. And that diversity
Unknown:of perspective in reaching your decisions is clearly impaired.
Unknown:So having people who do have different viewpoints to your own
Unknown:different worldviews even to your own, and probing with them.
Unknown:And then in a more practical level, I, I believe that we as
Unknown:leaders, there's two more things. One is, I believe in the
Unknown:power of journaling, at least it links to the first point I was
Unknown:making, and that through the power of journaling, you're able
Unknown:to pay attention to patterns. So what are you seeing about
Unknown:choices that you've made?
Unknown:About behaviors? What are you noticing through feedback? Yes.
Unknown:So I believe that good leaders elicit feedback and do so
Unknown:routinely. They ask people, What how are you experiencing my
Unknown:leadership, my decision making the approaches that I'm taking,
Unknown:they create an open, confidential forum, for there to
Unknown:be that sharing in and then journaling? I believe, taking
Unknown:the time to really reflect on what am I hearing? What patterns
Unknown:Am I seeing, and taking the tap the time to respond to that. And
Unknown:then finally, a really practical thing is, there's something
Unknown:called the MIT test. The MIT test is something that's been
Unknown:used millions of times. And what it does is it's Americanized. So
Unknown:it's important for listeners to be aware that there is that lens
Unknown:to it. It's not necessarily an impairment in and of itself,
Unknown:it's that there will be aspects of it that won't be relevant,
Unknown:for example, to audiences in the UK or audiences in Europe,
Unknown:that's really something to be aware of. But there is great
Unknown:utility around it. Because what it essentially does, is it gets
Unknown:us to start thinking, Lee about the narratives and the stories
Unknown:that we have been exposed to that influence us. In other
Unknown:words, it acknowledges and it helps us to acknowledge that we
Unknown:are all socialized, there are none of us who are a void of the
Unknown:impact of our environment of our upbringing. We are all shaped by
Unknown:the views that we've been exposed to when we were growing
Unknown:up. We've all been shaped we all continue to be shaped by the
Unknown:media, that we can assume that by the imagery by the news
Unknown:that's around us. We're all influenced and shaped by that.
Unknown:And so what the those tests invites us to do is ask
Unknown:ourselves the question, so if this image flashes up, what's
Unknown:our immediate instinctive response to that?
Unknown:What's the word that we use? If we see a young black person who
Unknown:is wearing certain attire? Do we assume that they are involved in
Unknown:some type of illegal activity? What what comes up for us? And
Unknown:then through this process of the test, you're able to see where
Unknown:perhaps your biases sit. Now it can mean many confronting and
Unknown:challenging, but But what it does is I believe, is
Unknown:important to see it without judgment, just observe it slow
Unknown:looking, just observe what's coming, what what's emerged from
Unknown:it, and ask ourselves a question, what is it telling me?
Unknown:And how we got here? Now, part of that story narrative might be
Unknown:what did we hear about race when we were growing up? When we hear
Unknown:about people from other countries? What do we hear about
Unknown:migrants? And when we look at that, when we think about what
Unknown:is that narrative, something that's influencing now, how I
Unknown:perceive certain people from different demographics? And by
Unknown:extension, if, if it's sitting there somewhere beneath the
Unknown:surface? How do I become mindful? So that I don't allow
Unknown:it to impair how I engage with those people? Because so often,
Unknown:most of us, I believe, ly believe ourselves to be good
Unknown:people. There is no one who would consciously say yes, I am
Unknown:racist, and I am proud, I am sexist, and I am proud, I am
Unknown:ageist and I am proud, there are point naught naught percent of
Unknown:the population would consciously willfully and deliberately say,
Unknown:I have described I behave in a discriminatory way toward a
Unknown:certain group of people. And I do so unapologetically, most
Unknown:people believe themselves to be good people. All right. So if we
Unknown:have that as a fundamental premise is the hypothesis. And
Unknown:then we weigh that up against Well, what are the results in
Unknown:wider society? I'm talking about in the West principally, but if
Unknown:we if we weigh that up against the results and outcomes for
Unknown:various demographics. So if we look at the outcomes for women
Unknown:in the workplace, and the gender pay gap, for example, well,
Unknown:would you would the majority of men say, Yes, I think we should
Unknown:pay women less than men. No, there would never be that
Unknown:conscious decision. And that's having regard to all of this,
Unknown:this sort of historic structural issues. But ultimately, we are
Unknown:at a point in our history, where women for the most part are
Unknown:still underpaid compared to their male counterparts. It was
Unknown:just recently as having a conversation with my daughter
Unknown:about those disparities within the legal sector, and they are
Unknown:significant, they are stopped. And over time, cumulatively,
Unknown:they build up to a picture of huge disadvantage that impacts
Unknown:your retirement, it impacts your pension, etc, you can your daily
Unknown:living, yes. So having a conscious decision that we
Unknown:intention, rather, that we will check our biases, because all of
Unknown:us, fall victim to them,
Unknown:in some form or other, and being intentional by having this slow
Unknown:looking, observing, looking at our patterns, doing journaling,
Unknown:some reflection, asking for feedback from those around us as
Unknown:to how they're experiencing our behaviors, and also surrounding
Unknown:ourselves with people who will think differently to us to help
Unknown:us really reflect on our decision making all of those
Unknown:things, I believe how to mitigate the risk of negative
Unknown:bias in our decision making. Yeah, thank you. And I suppose
Unknown:linked to that, I know you do a lot of work with boards around
Unknown:building an inclusive board, and I suppose I'm interested in what
Unknown:does that look and feel like to someone who is external to that
Unknown:board? And what would they be noticing for a board who is
Unknown:truly embracing inclusivity? A good board always has a good
Unknown:chair.
Unknown:It starts there. It starts with any board that I've sat on.
Unknown:There has been a good board has always had a good chair and
Unknown:chair who has been mindful that diversity and inclusion is
Unknown:important that their intention about one eliciting people's
Unknown:views and also creating the space for those views to be
Unknown:heard.
Unknown:And they aren't they recognize that they are not the person who
Unknown:has all of the answers nor has to have all of the answers. They
Unknown:lean on the the knowledge in the group to progress the
Unknown:organization. If you look at any data point right now, Lee,
Unknown:you'll see that representation at board level is very poor in
Unknown:terms of diversity. It is very poor. In fact, it that stubborn
Unknown:data remains quite stark and shocking. So in terms of
Unknown:diversity and board representation, that is not
Unknown:there. What I'm what I'm speaking then to more broadly is
Unknown:acknowledgement on those books.
Unknown:odds of that gap and the intention to close it. And in
Unknown:the meantime, as they journey toward that are intentional
Unknown:about creating safe spaces, where board members are able to
Unknown:share their viewpoints, have open dialogue, you'll see
Unknown:evidence of active listening, taking the time to genuinely
Unknown:listen. And there is an intention for those boards to
Unknown:develop themselves. They understand the skills that they
Unknown:have. And they are intention about filling the gaps. That for
Unknown:me, is the evidence of seeing really good boards work well,
Unknown:having regard to the caveat that, that there could always be
Unknown:better whether it's greater diversity of experience and
Unknown:thought, how do organizations shift from, I suppose those
Unknown:tokenistic gestures that we often say? And they might say
Unknown:the right things, but actually, how do they shift that to take
Unknown:in the right types of actions, because you've you've referenced
Unknown:yourself the fact that, you know, change is taken a long
Unknown:time isn't really changing. And I've, you've seen reports in
Unknown:lots of different industries where they've, you know, 2030
Unknown:years, things were recommended, and they're still not really
Unknown:being executed there. Was those the report from the McPherson
Unknown:report, wasn't it? How, however many years on from from that,
Unknown:being one example. And you we get these flurries of activity
Unknown:where people feel they should be saying something, and then it
Unknown:will just goes quiet. So how did organizations do that shift?
Unknown:I believe that it's three parts to it. I describe it as
Unknown:commitment, compassion, and accountability. So if you can
Unknown:imagine, first of all commitment being on a vertical axes, and
Unknown:compassion being on a horizontal axes, where you have low levels
Unknown:of commitment, and low levels of compassion, you have apathy and
Unknown:indifference.
Unknown:Where you have high levels of compassion, but low levels of
Unknown:commitment, you've got tokenism. What does that look like? Oh,
Unknown:those poor people, they're treated so unfairly. That is
Unknown:that's so discriminatory, and so unfair. But when it comes to
Unknown:actually doing something about it, there is nothing, there is
Unknown:no action, there is no follow through. So that's compassion,
Unknown:you're moved, you're saddened by it, you're not doing anything
Unknown:about it. If you go on the high levels of commitment, low levels
Unknown:of compassion, there you have compliance. So I will do what
Unknown:needs to be done. Because regulation and the law requires
Unknown:me to do so I don't really care how it impacts people's lives.
Unknown:Here is what the law requires me to do. And you know, there may
Unknown:be some penalties for me, if I don't do it, ultimately, what
Unknown:happens there, Lee is that where those regulations perhaps are no
Unknown:longer in place, then you won't do it. Because there's no real
Unknown:tug on your heart. There's no sense of moral obligation to do
Unknown:the right thing. It's the legal obligation to do the right
Unknown:thing. But the sweet spot, and to your point around how you
Unknown:ensure the organization shift from tokenism to meaningful
Unknown:action is where you have high levels of commitment, you have
Unknown:high levels of compassion, and you have accountability. They
Unknown:sit in that top box. Because what that says is, I am moved by
Unknown:this issue. I will do the work because it's the right thing to
Unknown:do. And I'll be measuring my results to make sure that we are
Unknown:doing what we will still will do. Yeah, I'm very visual. So
Unknown:I've already got this, the chart in my head is you took that
Unknown:free, I think that's really helpful. Yeah, anyone can sit
Unknown:there and go, Where do I think me? Where do I sit? And where
Unknown:does my organization says I think that's really helpful. I
Unknown:suppose one of the things that triggered that thought, as you
Unknown:were talking is where the burden of change lies because I think
Unknown:there's this almost this push and pull of wanting to create
Unknown:safe spaces for those who perhaps feel minoritized or are
Unknown:minoritized and organizations hand over responsibility to
Unknown:those to make the change happen. And then that becomes a
Unknown:completely get really exhausting on them. The board think tick,
Unknown:we've done our duty, you know, we've done the compliance bit
Unknown:and we've handed it over. So how did leaders start to balance
Unknown:that empowering people with and making them feel
Unknown:and that they are being heard and listened to, and all of that
Unknown:stuff with the fact that they've got to take the personal
Unknown:responsibility for making change happen. So the place where it
Unknown:doesn't start is where our start, it doesn't rest solely
Unknown:with HR.
Unknown:And so often what happens is when it comes to this work, in
Unknown:particular, of driving, this agenda of diversity, and
Unknown:inclusion is often just allocated to HR, HR will sort it
Unknown:out, and all will be well. And that is one unfair and HR is too
Unknown:unrealistic. And three is just setting an organization up for
Unknown:failure. What we are talking about here is culture change,
Unknown:changing hearts and minds and mindsets. Well, how do we do
Unknown:that? It starts first of all, with role modeling, doesn't it?
Unknown:That you cannot do this work of setting the tone and culture of
Unknown:an organization, without the leaders in the organization role
Unknown:modeling, very clearly, transparently, honestly, what it
Unknown:looks like, by doing it and being it themselves, and also
Unknown:being honest, candid, and vulnerable when they get things
Unknown:wrong. So role modeling, communication across the
Unknown:organization is key, you'd Of course, appreciate this name,
Unknown:what is the direction of travel, and communicating that clearly
Unknown:across the organization everywhere in the organization
Unknown:that there be no dark corner that's obscured from this
Unknown:message that this is who we are. And it comes through every form
Unknown:of connection, communication, it comes through in your
Unknown:onboarding. So when you're recruiting people, this is who
Unknown:we are, this is the coach that we're seeking to create, it
Unknown:comes through in your performance reviews. So to what
Unknown:extent have you engaged with this particular type of
Unknown:attribute in your work? It's almost as though because you're
Unknown:by design, wanting to ensure this becomes embedded it across
Unknown:everything in unmissable and you ensure that it's threaded
Unknown:through everything. So role modeling, communication, and
Unknown:some of that I feel from experience, having witnessed it
Unknown:really take root in other organizations is this idea of
Unknown:the champion or the ambassador. So having those people in your
Unknown:organization who are specifically tooled and equipped
Unknown:to be the ambassadors, the voice, the champions of the
Unknown:agenda, they're the people who, who will continue to actively
Unknown:encourage other people to be participants to engage to be
Unknown:proactive and appreciate the value of this empowering them
Unknown:starts to empower others. So one thing that you can't do is drive
Unknown:even leaders powerful command, control leaders are not able to
Unknown:drive culture change on their own, that needs to be something
Unknown:that is cascaded and having those voices, what in your
Unknown:senior leadership team in your senior management team. And then
Unknown:as that goes further down, really having those champions
Unknown:that will highlight the vision, and draw people into that, as
Unknown:you go deeper into the organization, communicate those
Unknown:messages that you're seeking to communicate, have the same
Unknown:passion and fervor that you have, as a leader, those things
Unknown:are really impactful in ensuring that this doesn't just become
Unknown:one department issue, that this is actually something that all
Unknown:of us need to embrace actively.
Unknown:And do you think that that's the same approach and we briefly
Unknown:touched on the fact that there perhaps isn't great diversity at
Unknown:board level and when you do get someone who is representative of
Unknown:minoritized group at board they possibly have got this dual
Unknown:thing of of having to tackle head on bias and discrimination
Unknown:that they're facing because of this the situation that they're
Unknown:in whilst also being that role model for others in and outside
Unknown:the organization? Is the approach the same for that
Unknown:because I'm suppose I'm conscious of the burden and then
Unknown:being pigeon holed as the poster person for whatever that issue
Unknown:might be, which I suppose belittles their offer as a
Unknown:leader at that my senior level. Yeah, there is a danger there.
Unknown:There is that risk that you become the person the go to
Unknown:person but what we know is sort of the history of of a movement
Unknown:there's a great video that I watched of a of a movement and
Unknown:it was an individual who was moving and somehow others
Unknown:started watching him and they started moving in there just
Unknown:became this dance in this park of of these people just starting
Unknown:this movement, this gathering of of dancers in a park it was
Unknown:quite random
Unknown:And that's the, that's the hallmark of a really good
Unknown:movement. It's the empowering of the many. It starts with the
Unknown:one, it cascades to the next and the next and the next and the
Unknown:next. And when you're creating change, you're clear in the way
Unknown:in which you communicate, and you hold the space. And you
Unknown:encourage others people to be participants, that you are not
Unknown:the only solution to this by any stretch, that we are all coming
Unknown:in it together. And you start to cascade that knowledge and
Unknown:empower the next to be the beacon and the voice. So we get
Unknown:into the end of our time together, I want to touch
Unknown:briefly on the non traditional leadership development, because
Unknown:that's something that I'm interested in. And I don't think
Unknown:that senior leaders are particularly well supported in
Unknown:that transition from when they're being in their
Unknown:specialist role to this organizational generalist, and
Unknown:all the broader skills that they're expected to bring into
Unknown:that most senior role. How do you think leadership development
Unknown:needs to change to reflect maybe the issues that you and I've
Unknown:been talking about today, the leadership, development needs to
Unknown:change by first of all acknowledging that it needs to
Unknown:change.
Unknown:So if the expectation is that we can do as we're doing, to
Unknown:respond to the future of of the world of business of the
Unknown:workplace of the world, as we are, we will become irrelevant.
Unknown:Actually, leaders who recognize that there needs to be any
Unknown:evolution to be relevant are the ones actually who are best
Unknown:placed to respond to that. And then to understand what are
Unknown:people saying that they need from us? Because leadership is
Unknown:largely about how do we get the best out of people, so that they
Unknown:can be bought into our vision and to perform? That's really
Unknown:what leadership is about? Well, how do we get the best out of
Unknown:people, it's about understanding from them, what gets the best
Unknown:out of them, that making assumptions. And we know that
Unknown:we're aware of when we're appreciative of situational
Unknown:leadership. But in the main, what we understand now more than
Unknown:ever, is that people want to be consulted, they want to have a
Unknown:voice, they're feeling much more empowered, aren't they? So
Unknown:leadership needs to respond to that it needs to be much more
Unknown:distributed, it needs to be much more collaborative and
Unknown:inclusive, and the leaders who get that they understand that we
Unknown:need to change we do need to evolve, and then listening to
Unknown:their people as to how best to become who the leader that they
Unknown:need to be in the moment that we're in those the ones who will
Unknown:be most impactful in the future. Perfect. My final question, and
Unknown:it's a quickie. What's the one piece of advice you'd give every
Unknown:chief exec or senior leader listening to this episode? I
Unknown:would encourage every leader to be strong and courageous.
Unknown:Perfect. No more needs to be said. Thank you so much for your
Unknown:time today. I literally could talk all day about this as so
Unknown:many other questions, but I'm sure I'm sure you've got other
Unknown:things you need to be doing. So thank you for speaking with me.
Unknown:If you enjoyed the episode, please leave a review on Apple
Unknown:podcasts. And let me know what you thought on LinkedIn. You can
Unknown:find me at Lee Griffith. I'll be back with the next episode in
Unknown:two weeks time. So in the meantime, sign up to my
Unknown:newsletter at Sundayskies.com for monthly insights on how else
Unknown:you can lead with impact. Until next time!