Artwork for podcast Leaders with impact
(E19) The workplace courage expert Sharon Amesu
Episode 1913th May 2024 • Leaders with impact • Lee Griffith
00:00:00 00:48:38

Share Episode

Shownotes

This episode is one about courage. The courage to show up as the leader you want to be. The courage to say the things that need to be said. Leaders in high performing teams, leaders with impact, have that courage - even if it is uncomfortable and messy and doesn’t always go to plan.

I’m delighted to speak with Sharon Amesu, an expert in building courage in the workplace. We talk about:

  • what workplace courage is
  • how a background in criminal justice led to a new career direction
  • everyday courage Vs heroic courage
  • not avoiding difficult conversations and articulating courage
  • how organisations can tackle bias and discrimination
  • leadership awareness and reflection
  • changing cultures
  • building inclusive and diverse boards, including the importance of the Chair
  • the inner work leaders need to do to embrace and make change happen
  • the need to change leadership development

Resources and helpful links

If you want to transform your leadership impact book a free consultation call with me

About leaders with impact

Want to know the secret of great leaders? In Leaders with impact we'll be exploring what makes an impactful leader; sharing stories of success and strategies that set them apart.

If you are ambitious for your organisation but are struggling to identify what you can do differently as a leader to deliver the right improvements, then hit subscribe to learn how you can get clear on your strategy, implement some self-leadership and connect with those you serve.

New episodes are released every fortnight.

Get in touch

If you enjoyed the episode please leave a review on Apple podcasts (or your app of choice) and let me know what you thought on LinkedIn or instagram.

I’ll be back with the next episode in two weeks so in the meantime remember to sign up to my newsletter to get notified of new episodes, guest appearances and further insights on how to lead with impact.

Transcripts

Unknown:

Today's episode is one about courage, the courage to

Unknown:

show up as the leader you want to be courage to say the things

Unknown:

that need to be said. Leaders in high performing teams leaders

Unknown:

with impact have that courage, even if it is uncomfortable,

Unknown:

messy and doesn't always good to plan. I'm Lee Griffith

Unknown:

communication strategist, executive coach and all around

Unknown:

champion of leaders who shun the old school stereotypes. I'm here

Unknown:

to help you get clear on your strategy, implement some self

Unknown:

leadership and connect with those who serve through your

Unknown:

communications so that you can deliver improved organizational

Unknown:

performance, engagement and reputation sign up to my

Unknown:

newsletters to receive even more useful insights into how to be

Unknown:

an impactful leader. You can also find out how I can support

Unknown:

your organization to better connect with the people it

Unknown:

serves. Visit Sundayskies.com To find out more.

Unknown:

In today's episode, I'm delighted to speak with Sharon

Unknown:

MSU. An expert in building courage in the workplace. We

Unknown:

talk about how organizations can change culture, tackle bias,

Unknown:

build inclusive and diverse boards, and the inner work

Unknown:

leaders need to do to embrace and make change happen. It's one

Unknown:

that will get you thinking for sure. Enjoy.

Unknown:

So Sharon, thank you so much for joining us on the leaders with

Unknown:

impact podcast, we're delighted to have you here today. You're a

Unknown:

workplace courage consultant, tell me what that entails. So

Unknown:

what we understand from what I understand from years of working

Unknown:

with organizations, and thinking about the various thought

Unknown:

leaders, both past and present, to reflect on what it takes for

Unknown:

us to be able to get the best out of our people in our

Unknown:

organizations, for people to be able to articulate their views

Unknown:

for them to be innovative, for them to be high performing, be

Unknown:

the best that they can be, and do the best that they can is

Unknown:

that it requires them to be able to raise their hands above the

Unknown:

parapet, and almost at times risk getting things wrong. And

Unknown:

the only way that we're able to do that, individually and

Unknown:

collectively, is when we're willing to be courageous, when

Unknown:

we're willing to step outside of those zones of comfort, and take

Unknown:

the risks. And say even if I'm wrong, I'll still try. It's

Unknown:

those who will have the attitude, the mindset to go

Unknown:

again, and not allow fear of rejection, fear of ridicule, to

Unknown:

determine whether or not they'll take the chance. And what

Unknown:

underpins all of that, therefore, is courage. It's me,

Unknown:

Angelou, who said that people forget what you say they'll

Unknown:

forget what you do, or they'll never forget how you made them

Unknown:

feel. And she also said that courage is the greatest of all

Unknown:

of the virtues that you can't practice any of the other

Unknown:

virtues, whatever they might be, you're not able to practice any

Unknown:

of them. If you don't have courage, they're willing to take

Unknown:

the risk. And in a time where what we need now more than ever

Unknown:

is, is great innovation we want we need people who are willing

Unknown:

to wrestle with the knotty, challenging issues that every

Unknown:

organization is facing, we have to face into what's often

Unknown:

described as VUCA, which is volatility and uncertainty,

Unknown:

complexity and ambiguity, when we don't have the stable ground

Unknown:

that we used to be able to stand on the predictability of the

Unknown:

business landscape of the workplace futures and all of

Unknown:

those things that helped us just to be able to perhaps walk with

Unknown:

greater confidence, we have to find something a resolution

Unknown:

within us that enables us to step into the unknown. And for

Unknown:

me, it's courage. And that's courage in relation to a

Unknown:

conversation that we have, are we willing to lean into those

Unknown:

areas that can be taxing and polarizing? Are we willing to

Unknown:

bring challenge where we see things are not quite going

Unknown:

right, that there's a direction of travel that's not conducive

Unknown:

to our growth? Or are we willing to face opposition and where

Unknown:

there may be dissents to our view still hold our own? So

Unknown:

workplace courage is all about that. How do we create cultures

Unknown:

within our organization that are underpinned by courage where

Unknown:

people are able to thrive, prosper, engage and really

Unknown:

advanced personally and professionally? There's so much

Unknown:

there that I want to unpack. How did you get to the point that

Unknown:

you're at where that's your focus, because you've had quite

Unknown:

an interesting career. It came largely from personal

Unknown:

experience, as is often the case with these things need So as

Unknown:

you've mentioned, my career started in law. But before that,

Unknown:

what drew me into law in the first place was I grew up during

Unknown:

the 1970s

Unknown:

His 1980's. And during that time, in the UK, there was a lot

Unknown:

of civil unrest, a lot of communities in particular, the

Unknown:

black community were facing marginalization exclusion, they

Unknown:

were facing significant disadvantage, discrimination.

Unknown:

And what I witnessed, which has never left me was the resolve

Unknown:

among those who are leaders without titles in the

Unknown:

communities rising up and bring together their collective voice

Unknown:

in the face of opposition, of obstruction, and obstacles, to

Unknown:

speak truth to power, irrespective of consequence,

Unknown:

because they had some grounded deep within them as to what was

Unknown:

right and what was fair and what was just. And I grew up under

Unknown:

that, in particular, my dad was a community activist, a social

Unknown:

convener, and he was a prominent figure in my life and observing

Unknown:

him, and seeing him speak to those who are leading in the

Unknown:

education system and bring challenge to the way that in

Unknown:

particular black boys were being treated in the education system

Unknown:

back in the 1970s, and 80s. And in fact, in reality, he, it

Unknown:

still persists today. But I saw courage. I saw individuals like

Unknown:

him, and there were others alongside him, who had the sense

Unknown:

of assuredness about them, that even though there were Goliath

Unknown:

that they were facing, they had a sense of knowing who they are,

Unknown:

that they were willing to do what needed to be done. Even if

Unknown:

there was a cost to them. It was this ability to step over the

Unknown:

inevitable fear, whatever that might have been reputation, and

Unknown:

financially, whatever it might have been, they were willing to

Unknown:

step over that to do the right thing and do what needed to be

Unknown:

done. It was that that awareness, that early awareness,

Unknown:

that really brought me into the legal sector where of course,

Unknown:

courage is needed in practice extensively, because you'll be

Unknown:

facing opponents who might be more senior to you. Certainly my

Unknown:

experience was as a black woman in the profession being a

Unknown:

minority on at least two fronts in terms of gender and race. And

Unknown:

so having the ability to tackle stuff like impostor syndrome,

Unknown:

and the fear of using your voice in a way as an advocate, which

Unknown:

may attract some ridicule in the courtroom, or in the Rubin room,

Unknown:

or whatever it might be, to be able to stand and hold your own,

Unknown:

I had to draw on something. And what I often found myself

Unknown:

drawing on in order to ground myself encouraged with those

Unknown:

stories that I've just relayed to you looking back at those,

Unknown:

those for me, matriarchs and patriarchs who are able to stand

Unknown:

and hold their own, and courage. Therefore, I began through my

Unknown:

own evolution. But then, as I began to work with organizations

Unknown:

and coach leaders, who would often be leaders without

Unknown:

authority, Lee, so they'd have a title, but no one would be

Unknown:

listening to them, because then they lacked a sense of

Unknown:

credibility and gravitas. Because they lacked courage.

Unknown:

Oftentimes, they weren't willing to hold the courageous

Unknown:

conversations, they weren't willing to manage performance,

Unknown:

perhaps or were a member of staff was underperforming, and

Unknown:

it was having an impact and other people on the team, the

Unknown:

manager or leader was not willing to have the necessary

Unknown:

conversation because they feared the the inputs and the impact of

Unknown:

that. So I just began to notice and see these threads emerge and

Unknown:

ask myself the question What does underpin high performance

Unknown:

cultures or people being able to thrive? What does make for a

Unknown:

good lead? What are the characteristics? What are the

Unknown:

traits and all roads lead to courage? It's as though when we

Unknown:

look at integrity. So if we were to ask for a list of

Unknown:

characteristics of any good leader, we would point to no

Unknown:

doubt, despite sometimes what we see in modern society of

Unknown:

leadership would still point to fundamentally things like

Unknown:

honesty, right, would point to integrity,

Unknown:

would point to accountability. All of these whatever

Unknown:

characteristical trait we would describe would then go on by

Unknown:

extension to ask ourselves, then how do we do that? How do they

Unknown:

manifest that? And at the heart of that each and every one of

Unknown:

those will be courage. As Mayor Angelou says, It takes courage

Unknown:

to be honest, because it may well be that you'll expose

Unknown:

yourself to a weakness or vulnerability. It takes courage

Unknown:

to be have integrity, because it may well be that you're

Unknown:

wrestling with two opposing views. And in fact, behind the

Unknown:

scenes as it were, no, Amin know the truth of something. But it

Unknown:

takes courage to do the right thing to it takes courage to be

Unknown:

transparent, and really be willing to hold your hands open

Unknown:

and say here are here's the reality of what's going on.

Unknown:

Because always there is the risk of the well, is this going to be

Unknown:

damaging of my reputation? Is this going to impact us

Unknown:

financially? Is this going to impact my future career, etc,

Unknown:

those will all be considerations that every single leader will

Unknown:

have a no doubt having a daily basis. But what I see I've

Unknown:

witnessed it personally, professionally. And I see it now

Unknown:

through my work is the leaders who are willing to be and I call

Unknown:

it competent courage. It's something I've really gleaned

Unknown:

from a brilliant author who wrote a book called choosing

Unknown:

courage, and essentially says courage is not just this sense

Unknown:

of speaking at will what comes to mind without any filter, and

Unknown:

just doing whatever I want, without any consideration of how

Unknown:

it impacts other people far from it. Courage is considered true

Unknown:

courage is considered. It is about measuring, evaluating,

Unknown:

reflecting on the risk, and then having regard to that, then

Unknown:

taking action. Now, of course, that takes that's a contrast to

Unknown:

those immediate acts of heroic courage, right? Where you've got

Unknown:

people, someone who will see a child in the street, and a car

Unknown:

is about to go toward them, and then they quickly run over and

Unknown:

they lift them off and save the day. All right, so that's not

Unknown:

there's not much analysis going on there, if any, it's

Unknown:

instinctive, but the reality is Lee, that 98.8% of the acts of

Unknown:

courage that take place are not those heroic acts. It's the

Unknown:

everyday acts of being true to yourself, of speaking truth, to

Unknown:

power, of being truly authentic, in how you show up at work.

Unknown:

Those are daily acts, and those acts of considered competent

Unknown:

courage are the ones that require us to have pause,

Unknown:

reflect and really think about, are we going to step over that

Unknown:

that line of fear? And do what needs to be done and make the

Unknown:

decision that needs to be made? Yeah, there's so much synergy

Unknown:

with the leaders I work with, because similarly, we're looking

Unknown:

at how do they bring their selves, their full selves into

Unknown:

an organization and perhaps fight against those stereotypes

Unknown:

and the old school way of leadership that still prevail in

Unknown:

a lot of organizations and still prevail, particularly I work

Unknown:

with with public sector, and you know, we hear all sorts coming

Unknown:

out of some of those organizations. And we look at

Unknown:

how they can communicate and connect and take people with

Unknown:

them. But it means for them to do that they've got to build an

Unknown:

earn trust, which comes from that point that you're saying

Unknown:

the courage to do things differently and to do things

Unknown:

that feel correct and authentic to them? Absolutely. Absolutely.

Unknown:

And that's the daily challenge, isn't it? Of Yeah, any, any

Unknown:

leader who is worth their salt, they will, who is leading

Unknown:

essentially, they will face daily challenges that they are

Unknown:

confronted with, which draws on their ability to stand and do

Unknown:

the right thing. And those roads, that the opportunities

Unknown:

for us to do the wrong thing, avails itself to everyone

Unknown:

throughout the day. And it takes courage to do the right thing.

Unknown:

Yeah, yeah, completely. So today, we absolutely get to

Unknown:

explore all of this in more detail, and also maybe help get

Unknown:

some practical things that people who are listening can

Unknown:

take forward. And I want to explore a bit around the topic

Unknown:

of diversity in senior leadership as well. And this

Unknown:

thought around tackling bias and discrimination in the workplace,

Unknown:

because I know that's something that you're really passionate

Unknown:

about as well. And I suppose I want to start from the point of

Unknown:

acknowledging that it can be a really difficult subject for

Unknown:

people to raise and talk about, they might feel uncomfortable or

Unknown:

scared about saying or doing the wrong thing. And that backlash

Unknown:

that comes when when they do and it doesn't necessarily need to

Unknown:

be just about diversity issues. You know, the thing you're

Unknown:

talking about courage, it could be anything that they're trying

Unknown:

to challenge the status quo, is that fear of backlash and saying

Unknown:

and doing the wrong thing. And I suppose I come from a point of,

Unknown:

we need to have messy conversations and I completely

Unknown:

acknowledge probably in the space of this, this conversation

Unknown:

that you and I have in that I'm going to not word things very

Unknown:

well or be a bit clumsy in my approach, but I'm

Unknown:

kind of happen, happy to, you know, be put back in and

Unknown:

corrected or, you know, at least I'm having that conversation.

Unknown:

And I think we've that courage breeds comfortableness in in

Unknown:

people to feel that they can say something without fear of what

Unknown:

might happen as a result. So what's your advice, I suppose to

Unknown:

leaders who perhaps are avoiding the difficult topics, whatever

Unknown:

they might be, I always begin with the basic understanding of

Unknown:

human behavior. And sometimes in these conversations, Lee, we

Unknown:

lose sight of the fact that there is a fundamental humanity

Unknown:

in me, and there's one in you. And that then helps us to

Unknown:

appreciate what are the types of things that helps us to build

Unknown:

good relationships with anyone else in our life?

Unknown:

Well, one, there is a sense of patience, there is interest,

Unknown:

genuine interest, there's genuine care. And we are able

Unknown:

individually to discern when someone's genuinely interested

Unknown:

in us when they genuinely care. We have an appreciation and

Unknown:

awareness of whether is good intention toward us. Why does

Unknown:

that matter? Because where those are in existence, that the sense

Unknown:

that someone cares for me, that they have good intentions toward

Unknown:

me, that they that between us we have that they listen, and then

Unknown:

there is empathy between us, then when that person gets

Unknown:

things wrong, which inevitably, they will, because back to that

Unknown:

humanity point, there are none among us who are perfect, there

Unknown:

is a certain level of grace, and there is a certain level of

Unknown:

leeway, that just exists in the relationship that enables us to

Unknown:

be able to accommodate each other's foibles and failings.

Unknown:

When I look at my own personal relationships, my husband, my

Unknown:

children, we say things to each other, and not intentionally,

Unknown:

but sometimes there may be a comment mark, which may be

Unknown:

slightly off, there is a relationship between us, which

Unknown:

means that they're able to come back to me say I didn't actually

Unknown:

like that statement. Like that comment, or vice versa. I know

Unknown:

you didn't intend that. But here's how it impacted me. What

Unknown:

it means is because there is this safety that we have created

Unknown:

between us, I have greater confidence that I'm able to

Unknown:

speak and know that if I'm saying something that might

Unknown:

cause offence, there is sufficient mileage between us

Unknown:

relationship capital between us that I can trust that they'll

Unknown:

come and speak to me and they'll raise that issue, and vice

Unknown:

versa. And for the large part that's not articulated that

Unknown:

there's no no long conversation, what is their relationship

Unknown:

capital between us, etc. But we essentially know through the

Unknown:

time that we built relationship, we spent time with each other,

Unknown:

we have conversations, we get to know each other's triggers, etc.

Unknown:

We have built our communication to the point where there is

Unknown:

safety, safety for candor, and vulnerability and honesty. We've

Unknown:

created the conditions for that. So my first point that I would

Unknown:

say to leaders is build good relationships around you, with

Unknown:

people that you need to have honest conversations with so

Unknown:

often, there is this sense that we we can just that the sense of

Unknown:

impairment and fear is most definitely understood Lee, I get

Unknown:

that, in particular in a time of canceled culture.

Unknown:

And I think sometimes the volatility in our public sphere

Unknown:

can be so divisive, it means that people fall into paralysis

Unknown:

and don't say anything. If in doubt, I would say it's best not

Unknown:

to oftentimes, especially were, in particular in social media as

Unknown:

opposed to general relationships, because social

Unknown:

media is just not the platform to be outing views that you are

Unknown:

either not clear will be polarizing or have the potential

Unknown:

to be polarizing. And I always advise leaders to be careful

Unknown:

about how they articulate their courage in those sorts of

Unknown:

platforms. But coming into the workplace, building

Unknown:

relationships with your colleagues, those colleagues who

Unknown:

are different, diverse to you in whatever form whether it be the

Unknown:

protected characteristics of the equalities act in the UK, or the

Unknown:

plethora of other forms of diversity. Find

Unknown:

Finding out about different people's experiences,

Unknown:

understanding their world, taking the time to be genuinely,

Unknown:

humbly curious, having good intentions in that all of those

Unknown:

create the conditions for people to be able to explore, and have

Unknown:

candid, honest, courageous conversations.

Unknown:

When it comes to the issue, for example of bias, as you just

Unknown:

referenced, that that is something that exists in all of

Unknown:

us. It's a part of, of the human condition, and cognition. So

Unknown:

it's who we are. And it's by necessity, all right, there's

Unknown:

lots of research, which points to the fact that having bias

Unknown:

helps us to be able to make decisions more quickly. So we're

Unknown:

not having to process the millions of pieces of data that

Unknown:

we're receiving constantly, it helps us to have those shortcuts

Unknown:

to decision making. So they're necessary. What becomes

Unknown:

problematic is when those quick unconsidered subconscious

Unknown:

decisions, as it were started to be detrimental to other groups,

Unknown:

whatever those groups might be. And that's where we need to

Unknown:

really question that, we have to engage in conversations around

Unknown:

this. Because if we don't, the situation and problem does not

Unknown:

go away, it simply becomes more embedded. And the paralysis that

Unknown:

I often see around this, which is, it's too scary to talk

Unknown:

about, I don't know if I'm going to get it wrong, I don't know if

Unknown:

I'm going to cause offence leads people to and therefore I'm not

Unknown:

going to talk about it. Meanwhile, this thing is these

Unknown:

differences, these contentions, these issues, the data around

Unknown:

discrimination, harassment, and so on, they still sit there not

Unknown:

being dealt with. And also frustration begins to emerge for

Unknown:

those disenfranchised and marginalized groups whose issues

Unknown:

are not being addressed. So it doesn't go away. And therefore,

Unknown:

the question is, how do we deal with it? Not should we deal with

Unknown:

it. And it starts with having really good relationships,

Unknown:

building strong relationships, communicating, you'd appreciate

Unknown:

that league, communicating good intention, being consistent in

Unknown:

that. And then over time, that builds trust, how you're able to

Unknown:

have that open dialogue? Yeah. You touched on the thing around

Unknown:

everyone having bias and I actually I interviewed Sharon

Unknown:

Carter, who's the Chief Executive of hexagon housing for

Unknown:

a previous episode of the podcast, and we had this same

Unknown:

conversation around everyone has had some form of bias. And

Unknown:

actually, the key is you bringing that awareness to

Unknown:

yourself around how that's influencing your behaviors and

Unknown:

your decision making. I know that's something that you work

Unknown:

with organizations on a day to day basis. So how do leaders

Unknown:

become more attuned, I suppose, to those biases that might be at

Unknown:

play. There's a really interesting book that I came

Unknown:

across recently in the title is called Slow looking, the

Unknown:

author's name escapes me what it's called Slow looking. And it

Unknown:

really, the author invites us to treat our lives and our

Unknown:

relationships and our world, like it would like we're in an

Unknown:

exhibition.

Unknown:

And we walk through, and when we go into an exhibition, or a

Unknown:

museum, or whatever it might be, we pay close attention we

Unknown:

observe, we start to notice, because we've slowed down our

Unknown:

pace, or we've taken the time to pay attention, we start to zoom

Unknown:

in to things that we would otherwise miss. So if you can

Unknown:

imagine the contrast between going to an art exhibition, and

Unknown:

alternatively, simply rushing through to catch a tube, train,

Unknown:

or capture training, you're just rushing the images at the train

Unknown:

station, but you're you're getting your train, you're

Unknown:

you're not really paying attention to anything but

Unknown:

heading with a beeline right to your train, there's a different

Unknown:

you're taking the time you're taking pause. I would say that

Unknown:

the same applies really to how we become aware of our biases,

Unknown:

we start to pay attention. We start to notice how we made

Unknown:

decisions and ask ourselves questions about how we've made

Unknown:

those decisions, such as would I have made the decision like this

Unknown:

if the person had different characteristics? So for example,

Unknown:

if I'm making a decision about a male colleague, when I made the

Unknown:

decision if it was a female colleagues, same decision, or if

Unknown:

it's a young person, would I have made the decision, same

Unknown:

decision if it was an older person, or if it's a white

Unknown:

colleague, would I have made the same decision if

Unknown:

It was a colleague of a different ethnicity or race.

Unknown:

Yes. So start asking ourselves those questions. Another really

Unknown:

useful approach to this is to surround ourselves with other

Unknown:

views or the diverse perspective, because so often

Unknown:

what we can do is we make decisions on our own in

Unknown:

isolation. We are almost like a confirmation bias we are, we're

Unknown:

clear that we are right, because all of the evidence in our heads

Unknown:

points the fact that we are. So we tend to believe ourselves.

Unknown:

And when we've made a decision, we believe it's right. And

Unknown:

that's why also I for example, value, and this is why I suspect

Unknown:

we have when we're recruiting, we'll have a panel why, because

Unknown:

simply having the perspective of one person making the decision

Unknown:

about who should be recruited in an organization where, for

Unknown:

example, it's a larger organization, then there is a

Unknown:

sense of bringing a range of perspectives around the table

Unknown:

that that we can discuss, and we can mull, and we can reason

Unknown:

together to see what is out, are we seeing the same thing?

Unknown:

Are there certain traits that I've missed that you have, you

Unknown:

have seen, et cetera. So there is sort of a proverb which says

Unknown:

that there is wisdom in the Council of many. And so sense

Unknown:

checking gauging with others, here is what I'm thinking of

Unknown:

doing. What do you think of that, and, and not as well,

Unknown:

simply having that group be made of people who are like you,

Unknown:

because otherwise, to some degree, whilst there's always

Unknown:

many forms of diversity, the danger is Lee, that you're

Unknown:

simply working within asking the opinion of people who think like

Unknown:

you who have a shared background. And that diversity

Unknown:

of perspective in reaching your decisions is clearly impaired.

Unknown:

So having people who do have different viewpoints to your own

Unknown:

different worldviews even to your own, and probing with them.

Unknown:

And then in a more practical level, I, I believe that we as

Unknown:

leaders, there's two more things. One is, I believe in the

Unknown:

power of journaling, at least it links to the first point I was

Unknown:

making, and that through the power of journaling, you're able

Unknown:

to pay attention to patterns. So what are you seeing about

Unknown:

choices that you've made?

Unknown:

About behaviors? What are you noticing through feedback? Yes.

Unknown:

So I believe that good leaders elicit feedback and do so

Unknown:

routinely. They ask people, What how are you experiencing my

Unknown:

leadership, my decision making the approaches that I'm taking,

Unknown:

they create an open, confidential forum, for there to

Unknown:

be that sharing in and then journaling? I believe, taking

Unknown:

the time to really reflect on what am I hearing? What patterns

Unknown:

Am I seeing, and taking the tap the time to respond to that. And

Unknown:

then finally, a really practical thing is, there's something

Unknown:

called the MIT test. The MIT test is something that's been

Unknown:

used millions of times. And what it does is it's Americanized. So

Unknown:

it's important for listeners to be aware that there is that lens

Unknown:

to it. It's not necessarily an impairment in and of itself,

Unknown:

it's that there will be aspects of it that won't be relevant,

Unknown:

for example, to audiences in the UK or audiences in Europe,

Unknown:

that's really something to be aware of. But there is great

Unknown:

utility around it. Because what it essentially does, is it gets

Unknown:

us to start thinking, Lee about the narratives and the stories

Unknown:

that we have been exposed to that influence us. In other

Unknown:

words, it acknowledges and it helps us to acknowledge that we

Unknown:

are all socialized, there are none of us who are a void of the

Unknown:

impact of our environment of our upbringing. We are all shaped by

Unknown:

the views that we've been exposed to when we were growing

Unknown:

up. We've all been shaped we all continue to be shaped by the

Unknown:

media, that we can assume that by the imagery by the news

Unknown:

that's around us. We're all influenced and shaped by that.

Unknown:

And so what the those tests invites us to do is ask

Unknown:

ourselves the question, so if this image flashes up, what's

Unknown:

our immediate instinctive response to that?

Unknown:

What's the word that we use? If we see a young black person who

Unknown:

is wearing certain attire? Do we assume that they are involved in

Unknown:

some type of illegal activity? What what comes up for us? And

Unknown:

then through this process of the test, you're able to see where

Unknown:

perhaps your biases sit. Now it can mean many confronting and

Unknown:

challenging, but But what it does is I believe, is

Unknown:

important to see it without judgment, just observe it slow

Unknown:

looking, just observe what's coming, what what's emerged from

Unknown:

it, and ask ourselves a question, what is it telling me?

Unknown:

And how we got here? Now, part of that story narrative might be

Unknown:

what did we hear about race when we were growing up? When we hear

Unknown:

about people from other countries? What do we hear about

Unknown:

migrants? And when we look at that, when we think about what

Unknown:

is that narrative, something that's influencing now, how I

Unknown:

perceive certain people from different demographics? And by

Unknown:

extension, if, if it's sitting there somewhere beneath the

Unknown:

surface? How do I become mindful? So that I don't allow

Unknown:

it to impair how I engage with those people? Because so often,

Unknown:

most of us, I believe, ly believe ourselves to be good

Unknown:

people. There is no one who would consciously say yes, I am

Unknown:

racist, and I am proud, I am sexist, and I am proud, I am

Unknown:

ageist and I am proud, there are point naught naught percent of

Unknown:

the population would consciously willfully and deliberately say,

Unknown:

I have described I behave in a discriminatory way toward a

Unknown:

certain group of people. And I do so unapologetically, most

Unknown:

people believe themselves to be good people. All right. So if we

Unknown:

have that as a fundamental premise is the hypothesis. And

Unknown:

then we weigh that up against Well, what are the results in

Unknown:

wider society? I'm talking about in the West principally, but if

Unknown:

we if we weigh that up against the results and outcomes for

Unknown:

various demographics. So if we look at the outcomes for women

Unknown:

in the workplace, and the gender pay gap, for example, well,

Unknown:

would you would the majority of men say, Yes, I think we should

Unknown:

pay women less than men. No, there would never be that

Unknown:

conscious decision. And that's having regard to all of this,

Unknown:

this sort of historic structural issues. But ultimately, we are

Unknown:

at a point in our history, where women for the most part are

Unknown:

still underpaid compared to their male counterparts. It was

Unknown:

just recently as having a conversation with my daughter

Unknown:

about those disparities within the legal sector, and they are

Unknown:

significant, they are stopped. And over time, cumulatively,

Unknown:

they build up to a picture of huge disadvantage that impacts

Unknown:

your retirement, it impacts your pension, etc, you can your daily

Unknown:

living, yes. So having a conscious decision that we

Unknown:

intention, rather, that we will check our biases, because all of

Unknown:

us, fall victim to them,

Unknown:

in some form or other, and being intentional by having this slow

Unknown:

looking, observing, looking at our patterns, doing journaling,

Unknown:

some reflection, asking for feedback from those around us as

Unknown:

to how they're experiencing our behaviors, and also surrounding

Unknown:

ourselves with people who will think differently to us to help

Unknown:

us really reflect on our decision making all of those

Unknown:

things, I believe how to mitigate the risk of negative

Unknown:

bias in our decision making. Yeah, thank you. And I suppose

Unknown:

linked to that, I know you do a lot of work with boards around

Unknown:

building an inclusive board, and I suppose I'm interested in what

Unknown:

does that look and feel like to someone who is external to that

Unknown:

board? And what would they be noticing for a board who is

Unknown:

truly embracing inclusivity? A good board always has a good

Unknown:

chair.

Unknown:

It starts there. It starts with any board that I've sat on.

Unknown:

There has been a good board has always had a good chair and

Unknown:

chair who has been mindful that diversity and inclusion is

Unknown:

important that their intention about one eliciting people's

Unknown:

views and also creating the space for those views to be

Unknown:

heard.

Unknown:

And they aren't they recognize that they are not the person who

Unknown:

has all of the answers nor has to have all of the answers. They

Unknown:

lean on the the knowledge in the group to progress the

Unknown:

organization. If you look at any data point right now, Lee,

Unknown:

you'll see that representation at board level is very poor in

Unknown:

terms of diversity. It is very poor. In fact, it that stubborn

Unknown:

data remains quite stark and shocking. So in terms of

Unknown:

diversity and board representation, that is not

Unknown:

there. What I'm what I'm speaking then to more broadly is

Unknown:

acknowledgement on those books.

Unknown:

odds of that gap and the intention to close it. And in

Unknown:

the meantime, as they journey toward that are intentional

Unknown:

about creating safe spaces, where board members are able to

Unknown:

share their viewpoints, have open dialogue, you'll see

Unknown:

evidence of active listening, taking the time to genuinely

Unknown:

listen. And there is an intention for those boards to

Unknown:

develop themselves. They understand the skills that they

Unknown:

have. And they are intention about filling the gaps. That for

Unknown:

me, is the evidence of seeing really good boards work well,

Unknown:

having regard to the caveat that, that there could always be

Unknown:

better whether it's greater diversity of experience and

Unknown:

thought, how do organizations shift from, I suppose those

Unknown:

tokenistic gestures that we often say? And they might say

Unknown:

the right things, but actually, how do they shift that to take

Unknown:

in the right types of actions, because you've you've referenced

Unknown:

yourself the fact that, you know, change is taken a long

Unknown:

time isn't really changing. And I've, you've seen reports in

Unknown:

lots of different industries where they've, you know, 2030

Unknown:

years, things were recommended, and they're still not really

Unknown:

being executed there. Was those the report from the McPherson

Unknown:

report, wasn't it? How, however many years on from from that,

Unknown:

being one example. And you we get these flurries of activity

Unknown:

where people feel they should be saying something, and then it

Unknown:

will just goes quiet. So how did organizations do that shift?

Unknown:

I believe that it's three parts to it. I describe it as

Unknown:

commitment, compassion, and accountability. So if you can

Unknown:

imagine, first of all commitment being on a vertical axes, and

Unknown:

compassion being on a horizontal axes, where you have low levels

Unknown:

of commitment, and low levels of compassion, you have apathy and

Unknown:

indifference.

Unknown:

Where you have high levels of compassion, but low levels of

Unknown:

commitment, you've got tokenism. What does that look like? Oh,

Unknown:

those poor people, they're treated so unfairly. That is

Unknown:

that's so discriminatory, and so unfair. But when it comes to

Unknown:

actually doing something about it, there is nothing, there is

Unknown:

no action, there is no follow through. So that's compassion,

Unknown:

you're moved, you're saddened by it, you're not doing anything

Unknown:

about it. If you go on the high levels of commitment, low levels

Unknown:

of compassion, there you have compliance. So I will do what

Unknown:

needs to be done. Because regulation and the law requires

Unknown:

me to do so I don't really care how it impacts people's lives.

Unknown:

Here is what the law requires me to do. And you know, there may

Unknown:

be some penalties for me, if I don't do it, ultimately, what

Unknown:

happens there, Lee is that where those regulations perhaps are no

Unknown:

longer in place, then you won't do it. Because there's no real

Unknown:

tug on your heart. There's no sense of moral obligation to do

Unknown:

the right thing. It's the legal obligation to do the right

Unknown:

thing. But the sweet spot, and to your point around how you

Unknown:

ensure the organization shift from tokenism to meaningful

Unknown:

action is where you have high levels of commitment, you have

Unknown:

high levels of compassion, and you have accountability. They

Unknown:

sit in that top box. Because what that says is, I am moved by

Unknown:

this issue. I will do the work because it's the right thing to

Unknown:

do. And I'll be measuring my results to make sure that we are

Unknown:

doing what we will still will do. Yeah, I'm very visual. So

Unknown:

I've already got this, the chart in my head is you took that

Unknown:

free, I think that's really helpful. Yeah, anyone can sit

Unknown:

there and go, Where do I think me? Where do I sit? And where

Unknown:

does my organization says I think that's really helpful. I

Unknown:

suppose one of the things that triggered that thought, as you

Unknown:

were talking is where the burden of change lies because I think

Unknown:

there's this almost this push and pull of wanting to create

Unknown:

safe spaces for those who perhaps feel minoritized or are

Unknown:

minoritized and organizations hand over responsibility to

Unknown:

those to make the change happen. And then that becomes a

Unknown:

completely get really exhausting on them. The board think tick,

Unknown:

we've done our duty, you know, we've done the compliance bit

Unknown:

and we've handed it over. So how did leaders start to balance

Unknown:

that empowering people with and making them feel

Unknown:

and that they are being heard and listened to, and all of that

Unknown:

stuff with the fact that they've got to take the personal

Unknown:

responsibility for making change happen. So the place where it

Unknown:

doesn't start is where our start, it doesn't rest solely

Unknown:

with HR.

Unknown:

And so often what happens is when it comes to this work, in

Unknown:

particular, of driving, this agenda of diversity, and

Unknown:

inclusion is often just allocated to HR, HR will sort it

Unknown:

out, and all will be well. And that is one unfair and HR is too

Unknown:

unrealistic. And three is just setting an organization up for

Unknown:

failure. What we are talking about here is culture change,

Unknown:

changing hearts and minds and mindsets. Well, how do we do

Unknown:

that? It starts first of all, with role modeling, doesn't it?

Unknown:

That you cannot do this work of setting the tone and culture of

Unknown:

an organization, without the leaders in the organization role

Unknown:

modeling, very clearly, transparently, honestly, what it

Unknown:

looks like, by doing it and being it themselves, and also

Unknown:

being honest, candid, and vulnerable when they get things

Unknown:

wrong. So role modeling, communication across the

Unknown:

organization is key, you'd Of course, appreciate this name,

Unknown:

what is the direction of travel, and communicating that clearly

Unknown:

across the organization everywhere in the organization

Unknown:

that there be no dark corner that's obscured from this

Unknown:

message that this is who we are. And it comes through every form

Unknown:

of connection, communication, it comes through in your

Unknown:

onboarding. So when you're recruiting people, this is who

Unknown:

we are, this is the coach that we're seeking to create, it

Unknown:

comes through in your performance reviews. So to what

Unknown:

extent have you engaged with this particular type of

Unknown:

attribute in your work? It's almost as though because you're

Unknown:

by design, wanting to ensure this becomes embedded it across

Unknown:

everything in unmissable and you ensure that it's threaded

Unknown:

through everything. So role modeling, communication, and

Unknown:

some of that I feel from experience, having witnessed it

Unknown:

really take root in other organizations is this idea of

Unknown:

the champion or the ambassador. So having those people in your

Unknown:

organization who are specifically tooled and equipped

Unknown:

to be the ambassadors, the voice, the champions of the

Unknown:

agenda, they're the people who, who will continue to actively

Unknown:

encourage other people to be participants to engage to be

Unknown:

proactive and appreciate the value of this empowering them

Unknown:

starts to empower others. So one thing that you can't do is drive

Unknown:

even leaders powerful command, control leaders are not able to

Unknown:

drive culture change on their own, that needs to be something

Unknown:

that is cascaded and having those voices, what in your

Unknown:

senior leadership team in your senior management team. And then

Unknown:

as that goes further down, really having those champions

Unknown:

that will highlight the vision, and draw people into that, as

Unknown:

you go deeper into the organization, communicate those

Unknown:

messages that you're seeking to communicate, have the same

Unknown:

passion and fervor that you have, as a leader, those things

Unknown:

are really impactful in ensuring that this doesn't just become

Unknown:

one department issue, that this is actually something that all

Unknown:

of us need to embrace actively.

Unknown:

And do you think that that's the same approach and we briefly

Unknown:

touched on the fact that there perhaps isn't great diversity at

Unknown:

board level and when you do get someone who is representative of

Unknown:

minoritized group at board they possibly have got this dual

Unknown:

thing of of having to tackle head on bias and discrimination

Unknown:

that they're facing because of this the situation that they're

Unknown:

in whilst also being that role model for others in and outside

Unknown:

the organization? Is the approach the same for that

Unknown:

because I'm suppose I'm conscious of the burden and then

Unknown:

being pigeon holed as the poster person for whatever that issue

Unknown:

might be, which I suppose belittles their offer as a

Unknown:

leader at that my senior level. Yeah, there is a danger there.

Unknown:

There is that risk that you become the person the go to

Unknown:

person but what we know is sort of the history of of a movement

Unknown:

there's a great video that I watched of a of a movement and

Unknown:

it was an individual who was moving and somehow others

Unknown:

started watching him and they started moving in there just

Unknown:

became this dance in this park of of these people just starting

Unknown:

this movement, this gathering of of dancers in a park it was

Unknown:

quite random

Unknown:

And that's the, that's the hallmark of a really good

Unknown:

movement. It's the empowering of the many. It starts with the

Unknown:

one, it cascades to the next and the next and the next and the

Unknown:

next. And when you're creating change, you're clear in the way

Unknown:

in which you communicate, and you hold the space. And you

Unknown:

encourage others people to be participants, that you are not

Unknown:

the only solution to this by any stretch, that we are all coming

Unknown:

in it together. And you start to cascade that knowledge and

Unknown:

empower the next to be the beacon and the voice. So we get

Unknown:

into the end of our time together, I want to touch

Unknown:

briefly on the non traditional leadership development, because

Unknown:

that's something that I'm interested in. And I don't think

Unknown:

that senior leaders are particularly well supported in

Unknown:

that transition from when they're being in their

Unknown:

specialist role to this organizational generalist, and

Unknown:

all the broader skills that they're expected to bring into

Unknown:

that most senior role. How do you think leadership development

Unknown:

needs to change to reflect maybe the issues that you and I've

Unknown:

been talking about today, the leadership, development needs to

Unknown:

change by first of all acknowledging that it needs to

Unknown:

change.

Unknown:

So if the expectation is that we can do as we're doing, to

Unknown:

respond to the future of of the world of business of the

Unknown:

workplace of the world, as we are, we will become irrelevant.

Unknown:

Actually, leaders who recognize that there needs to be any

Unknown:

evolution to be relevant are the ones actually who are best

Unknown:

placed to respond to that. And then to understand what are

Unknown:

people saying that they need from us? Because leadership is

Unknown:

largely about how do we get the best out of people, so that they

Unknown:

can be bought into our vision and to perform? That's really

Unknown:

what leadership is about? Well, how do we get the best out of

Unknown:

people, it's about understanding from them, what gets the best

Unknown:

out of them, that making assumptions. And we know that

Unknown:

we're aware of when we're appreciative of situational

Unknown:

leadership. But in the main, what we understand now more than

Unknown:

ever, is that people want to be consulted, they want to have a

Unknown:

voice, they're feeling much more empowered, aren't they? So

Unknown:

leadership needs to respond to that it needs to be much more

Unknown:

distributed, it needs to be much more collaborative and

Unknown:

inclusive, and the leaders who get that they understand that we

Unknown:

need to change we do need to evolve, and then listening to

Unknown:

their people as to how best to become who the leader that they

Unknown:

need to be in the moment that we're in those the ones who will

Unknown:

be most impactful in the future. Perfect. My final question, and

Unknown:

it's a quickie. What's the one piece of advice you'd give every

Unknown:

chief exec or senior leader listening to this episode? I

Unknown:

would encourage every leader to be strong and courageous.

Unknown:

Perfect. No more needs to be said. Thank you so much for your

Unknown:

time today. I literally could talk all day about this as so

Unknown:

many other questions, but I'm sure I'm sure you've got other

Unknown:

things you need to be doing. So thank you for speaking with me.

Unknown:

If you enjoyed the episode, please leave a review on Apple

Unknown:

podcasts. And let me know what you thought on LinkedIn. You can

Unknown:

find me at Lee Griffith. I'll be back with the next episode in

Unknown:

two weeks time. So in the meantime, sign up to my

Unknown:

newsletter at Sundayskies.com for monthly insights on how else

Unknown:

you can lead with impact. Until next time!

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube