Artwork for podcast The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
Episode 424 - Housing and Gaza
15th April 2024 • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
00:00:00 01:21:15

Share Episode

Shownotes

Topics:

00:43 Technical Troubles and Audio Adventures

01:14 Introducing the Cast: From Velvet Glove to Tech Guy

01:43 A Week in Review: From Housing Affordability to Global Politics

02:57 Board Games and Gratitude: Quiddler and More

06:01 The Luhrmann Case: A Deep Dive into Defamation and Justice

18:29 Housing Crisis in Australia: Policies, Problems, and Public Opinion

34:41 The Role of Public Housing and Foreign Investment in the Housing Market

38:22 Reflecting on Australia's Housing Crisis and Policy Impacts

38:47 The Role of Land Costs and Construction in Housing Prices

40:52 Government Policies and Their Effect on Housing Affordability

41:26 Historical Perspectives on Home Ownership and Policy Changes

43:49 The Boomer Generation's Influence on Housing and Retirement

47:33 Exploring Solutions to the Housing Crisis and Negative Gearing Debate

52:27 The Global Stage: AUKUS, Japan, and International Relations

56:12 International Comparisons and the Complexity of Housing Markets

01:03:01 The Middle East Conflict: Perspectives, Reactions, and Media Coverage

01:19:28 Concluding Thoughts and the Australian Government's Stance

To financially support the Podcast you can make:

We Livestream every Monday night at 7:30 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.

You can sign up for our newsletter, which links to articles that Trevor has highlighted as potentially interesting and that may be discussed on the podcast. You will get 3 emails per week. After the fiasco mentioned in episode 454 I can't use Mailchimp anymore so for the moment, send me an email and I'll add you to a temporary list until something more automated is arranged.

We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can send us a voicemail message at Speakpipe

Transcripts started in episode 324. You can use this link to search our transcripts. Type "iron fist velvet glove" into the search directory, click on our podcast and then do a word search. It even has a player which will play the relevant section. It is incredibly quick.

Transcripts

Sir David:

Suburban Eastern Australia, an environment that has, over

Sir David:

time, evolved some extraordinarily unique groups of homosapiens.

Sir David:

But today, we observe a small tribe, akin to a group of Meerkats that

Sir David:

gather together atop a small mound to watch question and discuss the

Sir David:

current events of their city, their country, and their world at large.

Sir David:

Let's listen keenly and observe this group fondly known as the

Sir David:

Iron Fist and the velvet glove.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

And after 423 episodes, we are still trying to figure out audio.

Trev:

technical issues, despite all of the practice, dear listener.

Trev:

So yes, sorry about the audio last week.

Trev:

Um, and it still turns out I had errors in it, which I might get to fixing tomorrow.

Trev:

And now we're just trying to deal with Joe's audio, which was soft

Trev:

and muddy and trying to fix it.

Trev:

And we're doing that in a mad panic before the start time of eight o'clock.

Trev:

So, well, coming through loud and clear.

Trev:

From regional Queensland, Scott the Velvet Glove.

Trev:

Scott, how are you?

Scott:

Not too bad.

Scott:

G'day Trevor, g'day Joe, g'day listeners.

Scott:

I hope everyone's well.

Trev:

And possibly sabotaged by Peter Dutton for the abuse that Joe gives him as

Trev:

a member in his electorate or as a voter.

Trev:

Joe the Tech Guy, are you coming through loud and clear?

Trev:

I'm hoping so.

Trev:

That's better.

Trev:

Yes, that's better.

Trev:

Okay.

Trev:

So good.

Trev:

All right.

Trev:

We'll keep working on that as we go.

Trev:

So dear listener, Oh, what a week.

Trev:

Hey, what a week.

Trev:

We'll work our way through the different issues, have a chat

Trev:

about them, see where we end up.

Trev:

We'll talk a little bit about my anecdote in relation to the Bondi tragedy.

Trev:

Uh, we'll kick off a bit about housing affordability.

Trev:

I know we've done it lots, but there's more stuff come out.

Trev:

Um, and I think we'll get onto.

Trev:

Um, just the way that the Labor and the Coalition are really now sort of reduced

Trev:

town to about a third of the vote each, which leaves a third for Independents and

Trev:

how we're moving to perhaps a European style of Parliament that nobody's

Trev:

quite ready for yet, and Tasmania is the first example of that perhaps.

Trev:

And then we'll get on to Gaza and Israel and Iran and.

Trev:

All that sort of stuff, and, yeah, there we go.

Trev:

So if you're in the chat room, say hello.

Trev:

John's in there.

Trev:

Uh, he's calling in from Glen Innes.

Trev:

Good on ya, John.

Trev:

So, okay.

Trev:

Um, kicking off.

Trev:

Grateful for.

Trev:

I'm grateful for the game of Quiddler.

Trev:

You guys ever played Quiddler?

Trev:

No.

Trev:

No?

Trev:

Little board game, not that expensive, you can get it for under 20 bucks.

Trev:

Basically, uh, you get dealt cards that have letters on them.

Trev:

The letters have a value, a bit like Scrabble, in that hard to

Trev:

use letters have more points.

Trev:

You've got to form words.

Trev:

It's just a fun game.

Trev:

My wife and I have been playing it heaps and Yeah, getting a

Trev:

lot of fun out of that one.

Trev:

So if you're looking for a board game, dear listener, I highly recommend Quiddla.

Trev:

So Q U I D D L E R I don't get any commission or receive

Trev:

any royalties for that.

Trev:

It's an honest review.

Trev:

You guys got anything that you're grateful for?

Trev:

Anything good happen?

Trev:

Anything you want to share of your personal lives before we move on?

Scott:

I've had a couple of interviews just recently.

Scott:

I've still got to wait back to hear from one and another one that's coming

Scott:

up for me on Wednesday afternoon.

Trev:

Thoughts and prayers, Scott?

Scott:

Yeah, we can shove your thoughts.

Joe:

Joe, anything for you?

Joe:

Ah, nothing exciting, um There are a couple of games that I do play.

Joe:

Um, there's a word game that someone I know in the UK has

Joe:

written, I've just shared it in the chat, which is called Cell Tower.

Joe:

Um, which is just a little brain teaser.

Joe:

Uh, renews every 24 hours and you can work your way through trying to work out.

Joe:

Basically, there's however many words in a block.

Joe:

of letters, and you just have to work your way out the right number

Joe:

so you don't paint yourself in a corner by picking the wrong words

Joe:

and end up with letters left over.

Trev:

Very good.

Joe:

But that's a single player game.

Joe:

There's also an online jigsaw puzzle game, which you can actually play with

Joe:

multiple players, which we've done.

Joe:

It does kind of stifle the conversation though.

Trev:

Just back to Quiddla, um, you obviously have arguments about

Trev:

whether a word is a valid word.

Trev:

So we bought an old dictionary from a second hand bookshop.

Trev:

And if it's not in that dictionary, it's not a word.

Trev:

Because you can go online and there's all sorts of BS words online, on these

Trev:

online dictionaries, so, if you do end up with Quiddla, buy yourself a, get

Trev:

a hard copy dictionary, so you don't have to look up phones and, yeah,

Trev:

there's a little tip there, so, right.

Trev:

I,

Joe:

I remember playing Scrabble with mum's partner and he refused to

Joe:

accept that quoll was a valid word.

Joe:

Okay, well okay, it's just an animal, isn't it?

Joe:

It's a quoll.

Joe:

Well, yeah, yeah, but I mean, he's from the UK, nobody's ever heard of it.

Joe:

Yeah.

Trev:

Well, if you're using a UK dictionary, he might have challenged

Trev:

you, because it may not be in there.

Trev:

I

Joe:

think it, I think it's in the Oxford English.

Trev:

There you go, so yeah.

Trev:

Alright, um.

Trev:

John in the chat room says, are you going anywhere near the Luhrmann result?

Trev:

And the answer is no, cause I haven't even heard the result.

Trev:

What was it?

Trev:

Well, maybe we are.

Trev:

Scott, be careful, be careful Scott, not to commit any acts of defamation.

Scott:

Well, I'm not going to commit any, I'm just going to

Scott:

repeat what the judge said.

Scott:

The judge said that as far as he can tell that, uh, she was, that she and Luhrmann

Scott:

had sex in the, um, in Parliament House.

Scott:

And that he also couldn't, he also said that he didn't

Scott:

believe that it was consensual.

Scott:

So he had actually, it certainly sounds like the judge has come down on the

Scott:

side of the, uh, prosecution, but the judge, he actually was at pains to

Scott:

say that, that the burden of proof in a civil case is a lot lower than the

Scott:

burden of proof in a criminal case.

Scott:

So as far as he was concerned, there was no.

Scott:

Judgment of his guilt or innocence, but it was just saying on the balance of

Scott:

probabilities, he probably raped her.

Trev:

Therefore, the defamation case failed.

Trev:

Was thrown out, yes.

Trev:

Oh,

Joe:

wow.

Joe:

And said that he had doubts about the credibility of both witnesses.

Joe:

Uh, but that Lerman was, uh, I think he said something like, economical

Joe:

with the truth when it suited him, something along those lines.

Joe:

Hmm.

Joe:

But he said he didn't believe that, I think, uh, either

Joe:

witness was completely truthful.

Trev:

There we go.

Trev:

Well, I mean,

Scott:

it's one of those things, it's just, you know,

Scott:

like I said, it's not a burden.

Scott:

The burden of proof is very different under a civil case

Scott:

than what is in a criminal case.

Scott:

So the judge was at pains to actually point that out.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

Uh, whatever article I was reading basically said, in a

Joe:

civil case, you can just say, this is the most likely explanation.

Joe:

It's a burden.

Joe:

Whereas in a criminal case, you have to say you've excluded

Joe:

all other explanations.

Trev:

And so the Lerman case starts to, um, joins up now with what's

Trev:

becoming a longer list of defamation actions that were started and that

Trev:

backfired on the people who started it.

Scott:

It's blown up in his face, and the judge even said something about, um,

Scott:

I can't remember exactly what he said, but he said something about, you know,

Scott:

he's come in here to collect his hat, and it's been thrown back in his face.

Scott:

You know, which is just one of those things, it's, uh.

Joe:

And there's still the Toowoomba trial to go, isn't there?

Scott:

Uh, I believe so, yeah.

Trev:

Yeah, because it has been a weapon, this sort of defamation threat,

Trev:

that these huge payouts are possible.

Trev:

I sometimes have to question whether they were in line with the

Trev:

actual damaged reputation or not.

Trev:

But, uh, anyway, people might maybe start to think twice, a bit more.

Trev:

I mean, I

Scott:

think, um, Well, that's two, two high profile cases that

Scott:

have blown up in their faces.

Scott:

You know, like you've got, um, the soldier, can't remember his name.

Scott:

Robert Sazer.

Scott:

Sorry?

Scott:

Robert Smith.

Scott:

Robert Smith.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

You know, he sued and that soldier's blown up in his face.

Scott:

And then you've got Lerman's sued and that's blown up in his face.

Scott:

And

Trev:

I think there was a

Scott:

recent

Trev:

thing where there was reports made about Alan Jones.

Trev:

And, um, basically he hasn't started a defamation suit, and maybe in past

Trev:

times he might have thought about it, maybe learning some lessons from the

Trev:

current, you know, from those two cases.

Trev:

So, yeah.

Scott:

Well, I would hope so, because it's just, I, I'm just a little bit concerned

Scott:

about the level of, um, Litigiousness that's already going on in Australia,

Scott:

becoming a very litigious community just like the United States, which I just

Scott:

don't think is actually good for us.

Scott:

Yeah,

Trev:

you just want a genuine assessment of somebody's reputation and how

Trev:

it's been damaged and, you know.

Joe:

I'm thinking, you know, um, I would never have assumed that a

Joe:

defamation case was going to win because I remember the Geoffrey Archer case.

Trev:

Who's that?

Trev:

Geoffrey Archer.

Trev:

Geoffrey Archer, he

Joe:

was a novelist back in the UK, and he was accused of,

Joe:

I think, cheating on his wife.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

And he, he basically sued for defamation, lost, and then was,

Joe:

I think, jailed for, uh, perjury.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

He was jailed anyway, and I'm fairly sure it was in relation to that case.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

Um, so, yeah, that was in the 1980s in the UK.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

And kind of said, you can't just, the thing about defamation is very

Joe:

much, if it's a person who's rich and threatening somebody who's poor, they

Joe:

can't afford to defend themselves.

Trev:

And then there was Lance Armstrong was basically warding off enquiries from

Trev:

people with threats of defamation when people were writing things or wanting

Trev:

to write things about his doping.

Trev:

I think he was threatening defamation as a means of Stopping, um,

Scott:

that

Trev:

being exposed, so, yeah.

Scott:

The US has got a very different defamation system over there, don't

Trev:

they?

Trev:

Particularly if you're a public figure, it's kind of, um, almost all bets

Trev:

are off if you're a public figure.

Joe:

Well, you have to prove that they knowingly told a falsehood.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

Or that they acted in such a way that they should have reasonably known.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

So that they were, they were not just, oh well I thought it was different.

Joe:

You have to prove that they, they should have known better.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Maybe one of those rare areas where the US legal system might be, might be

Trev:

closer to the mark of what's the best.

Trev:

So yeah, oh there we go.

Trev:

So John, I wasn't planning on it, but um, there you go, some

Trev:

hot takes on that decision.

Trev:

Um, A sorry state of affairs really for our media, just the, I don't read the

Trev:

nuts and bolts of it, but just the way that he was entertained and rent paid.

Trev:

Yeah, that

Scott:

was bloody disgusting.

Trev:

Allegedly, thank you, Joe, allegedly entertained.

Trev:

They were

Scott:

allegedly entertained with, allegedly by hookers

Scott:

and drugs and everything else.

Scott:

Those were the allegations that were made.

Trev:

Yes, just.

Trev:

Uh, doesn't paint a good picture of, um, journalism in this country.

Trev:

Mmm.

Trev:

Mmm.

Trev:

Now, um, oh, the Bondi Junction, um, stabbings.

Joe:

Mmm.

Joe:

Yes, did you notice in a certain private Facebook group that

Joe:

somebody had posted some discussion literally hours after it happened?

Joe:

going on about the religion of peace and how it was obviously a muslim

Joe:

because he had a big thick beard

Trev:

No, I didn't

Joe:

Okay

Trev:

Yeah, you

Scott:

know I saw an interview with the mother and that sort of

Scott:

stuff of him and she did not look like Islamic or anything like that.

Scott:

She just looked like,

Joe:

you

Scott:

know, it's one of those things.

Scott:

I'm not sure where you legit stand on this, but, um, I said years and years

Scott:

ago to my brother, who's a psychiatric nurse, I said to him, you know,

Scott:

speaking is a purely non Professional from that field, I would suggest that

Scott:

the closure of asylums and everything else in Australia was a mistake.

Scott:

And he said, yes, I agree with you.

Scott:

So he actually reckons that, uh We don't have

Trev:

asylums?

Scott:

Sorry?

Trev:

We, we don't have asylums?

Scott:

We don't have them.

Scott:

No, you have to actually, you have to be a threat to yourself and

Scott:

others to get locked up in them.

Scott:

Right.

Scott:

See, whereas prior to that, you could actually commit someone who wasn't

Scott:

a threat to themself or others.

Scott:

Ah.

Scott:

So I would have thought that this bloke who had been under the treatment

Scott:

of physicians and everything for about 18 years, that they would have

Scott:

actually said, well, that's serious enough that we've got to lock him up.

Scott:

But anyway, they, the government chose to close them down many, many moons ago.

Joe:

The argument was the modern medications meant that a people could

Joe:

live a full and active life in community.

Joe:

However,

Scott:

only if they're taking the drugs.

Scott:

Yeah, exactly.

Scott:

Which is one of the things, if you're not going to take the drugs, you're going to

Scott:

end up falling off that wagon and you end up fucked up again, which means you're

Scott:

sleeping on the street, you're potentially a victim of violence, or you're

Scott:

potentially a perpetrator of violence.

Scott:

I think to myself, what would that mother actually prefer?

Scott:

Would she prefer to go and visit her son once a week?

Scott:

In a mental hospital, where she knows that her son was being medicated and

Scott:

looked after and everything else.

Scott:

Or would she prefer just to go and visit his grave now?

Joe:

Having been on psychiatric wards, they're not a place you'd want to be.

Scott:

No, I agree wholeheartedly.

Scott:

I agree wholeheartedly.

Scott:

They're not very nice places at all.

Scott:

But if you compare that to the number of people that are living

Scott:

on the streets now, um, you know, it's just one of those things.

Trev:

Well, my experience was that I was getting into an elevator in this

Trev:

apartment building and there's an elderly couple on the same floor who

Trev:

I know, and Um, they said, oh, they were, uh, heading in the elevator to go

Trev:

down to the shops to buy the newspaper.

Trev:

And I immediately was like, rolling my eyes, because that

Trev:

clearly meant only one newspaper, which was, uh, The Courier Fail.

Trev:

And um, as we got in the, in the elevator, um, the lady said, oh, I

Trev:

think we just, oh, wasn't that terrible what happened in Bondi, and she

Trev:

said, yeah, terrible, and, you know, Somebody should tell that Albanese

Trev:

that that was one of his immigrants.

Trev:

That's, you know, somebody should tell him.

Trev:

I was like, born in Australia at, at that point I'd only sort of just

Trev:

heard that he was a Queenslander.

Trev:

I said, well, I just heard he's a Queenslander.

Trev:

And she was like, oh, really?

Trev:

But I just thought, man.

Trev:

Yeah, that's people from Toowoomba, you can't trust them.

Trev:

Scott being from Toowoomba.

Trev:

Yeah, I was from Toowoomba.

Trev:

And I thought, wow, on a matter like this, we have, people are prepared

Trev:

to reduce that to party politics.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

And just, it was really disappointing.

Trev:

And, you know, they're a nice couple and, but I just thought this

Trev:

fucking Murdoch rag, if it, just the, the way it's, Propagandise

Trev:

people into being able to take that

Joe:

view.

Joe:

I don't think it's just that.

Joe:

I think whoever you hate the most, you're going to, if you're small

Joe:

minded, you're going to immediately assume it's whoever you hate.

Trev:

And you're looking for an excuse to blame whoever you hate.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

For everything that happens that's bad.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

It's like, really?

Trev:

Just on a day like this and you're ready to lay it at Albanese feet.

Trev:

And I was thinking, I was thinking to myself afterwards, I should

Trev:

have thought even quicker.

Trev:

Like I should have told her.

Trev:

No, it was one of, uh, Morrison's, um, immigrants, actually, it might be one of

Trev:

Dutton's, um, not Dutton, um, Costello's.

Trev:

Yeah, Abbott's.

Trev:

Oh.

Trev:

Or uh, somebody like that.

Trev:

'cause it was just the assumption that it had to be Albanese immigrant.

Trev:

It was just really.

Trev:

Depressing, but there we go.

Trev:

Yeah,

Joe:

uh,

Trev:

right, anyone got anything more to add on that or we'll just move on?

Joe:

Well, um, so which immigrants were the William Biller shooters?

Trev:

Uh, were they the ones out past Dolby?

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

I don't think there are any immigrant from anywhere except, um, White Anglo

Trev:

Saxon fridge from Yeah, well, exactly.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Well, maybe they weren't, Joe.

Trev:

I don't know.

Trev:

Just, you can't say that by looking at somebody, can you?

Joe:

Well, that's true.

Joe:

They might have

Trev:

identified as Indigenous.

Trev:

I don't know.

Trev:

Didn't hear that come out, but, um Yeah, that was depressing.

Trev:

All right.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

We're going to talk about housing now.

Trev:

So, there was A poll out from Essential asking people about, um, to what

Trev:

extent would you support or oppose the following housing policies in Australia?

Trev:

And, um, remove tax concessions like negative gearing and capital gains

Trev:

tax discounts for property investors.

Trev:

Overall, 24 percent strongly support and 27 percent somewhat support.

Trev:

and 30 percent were neutral.

Trev:

Only 19 percent would oppose that.

Trev:

So we're reaching the point where the majority of Australians are ready to

Trev:

remove negative gearing and capital gains tax according to this, uh, essential poll.

Trev:

So there's a mood out there for change is brewing, I think.

Trev:

Um, Unfortunately, in the same poll, I asked people about a policy

Trev:

of allowing first home buyers to access their superannuation to help

Trev:

them purchase their first home.

Trev:

And unfortunately, 57 percent of people were in favour of that,

Trev:

and 25 percent were neutral.

Trev:

Dear listener, all that will do, allowing young is boost up the price of housing.

Trev:

Saul Eslake.

Trev:

Scott, you listened to the 7am podcast.

Trev:

Yeah, and I listened

Scott:

to him this morning.

Scott:

He was very articulate.

Scott:

He laid the blame right at Howard's feet.

Trev:

And he said

Scott:

that, you know, everything Howard did was just going to inflate the prices.

Trev:

Yeah.

Scott:

Which is exactly what has happened.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

So he was

Scott:

It's one of those things.

Scott:

Howard has never made any secret that he hated the capital gains tax.

Scott:

He hates

Trev:

it.

Scott:

And he actually tried to He wanted to repeal it, but they

Scott:

all said no, you can't repeal it.

Scott:

So we did the next best thing, which is where he gutted it.

Trev:

You

Scott:

know, it's

Trev:

Now, were you a card carrying member of the Liberal Party at the time, Scott?

Trev:

Oh, I

Scott:

was, yes, a card carrying member of the Liberal Party.

Scott:

Did

Trev:

you think at the time, well, that's a good idea.

Scott:

No, not really.

Trev:

Right.

Scott:

I did actually have some questions of it.

Trev:

Okay.

Scott:

Because I didn't think it was that bad what they're asking

Scott:

you to do, to calculate the post.

Scott:

The post inflationary gain was all you paid tax on.

Scott:

Yes.

Scott:

Which was very reasonable.

Trev:

Mm.

Scott:

So if your property price is, uh, If your property price went up above

Scott:

the, above the, above the inflation rate, then you pay tax on that.

Scott:

And then they also had another thing that, um, said that that couldn't

Scott:

push you up into the next tax bracket or anything like they calculated the

Scott:

total tax on that at the highest rate of tax that you're currently getting

Scott:

charged, which was quite reasonable.

Scott:

Now what they've done is they have just slashed it and they've said

Scott:

that, you know, you hold something for 12 months, you sell it and you

Scott:

make a profit on it, you only have to pay tax on 50 percent of that.

Scott:

Now I don't know whether or not you still, um, I don't know where you actually

Scott:

get that, um, whether or not it, uh, I can't remember what it was called,

Scott:

I think it was, anyway, averaging or something like that on the income tax,

Scott:

you know, I'm not sure if you still get that averaging or whether or not

Scott:

you, you actually pay tax at the end.

Trev:

I think people who have a very variable income can average it out

Trev:

over a few years if they've had a spike for some reason of some sort.

Trev:

Yeah, but that's a I don't know if that's still the case.

Trev:

It used to be.

Scott:

That only relates to farmers and those sorts of people.

Scott:

You've got, um, that was where you average your income out over a few years.

Scott:

Is

Trev:

that what you're talking about?

Scott:

No, but the averaging was, averaging was something

Scott:

that was, was given to you if you were in receipt of capital gains.

Scott:

And that was to make sure that you didn't actually get boosted up into

Scott:

the top capital, and you didn't actually pay tax at the top rate.

Scott:

on the capital gain, it was at a lower rate because they averaged it out.

Scott:

So I'm just not sure if that's still the case or whether or not

Scott:

they just throw the 50 percent of it into your, into your income tax

Scott:

and you just pay the tax on that.

Scott:

I couldn't tell you.

Scott:

My

Trev:

memory, Scott, when capital gains was first introduced by Keating?

Trev:

I think,

Scott:

I

Trev:

think

Scott:

it was September 1985 was when it started.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

And basically it was announced that night, like in a budget or something like that.

Scott:

I don't know where it was announced.

Scott:

It was, it was either announced by, um, media conference or it

Scott:

was announced in the budget.

Scott:

I couldn't tell you.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

But it was pretty much the day of the change, which was from now on.

Trev:

Exactly.

Trev:

From this moment onwards.

Scott:

19th of September 1985.

Trev:

Yeah, um, there was, uh, assets bought prior to that time would be exempt.

Trev:

Pre

Scott:

CGT and they're exempt.

Trev:

Correct.

Trev:

And assets bought after that time would then be subject to

Trev:

the new capital gains tax regime.

Trev:

And it was, I don't know, I just have a memory of it being a, A bit of a shock

Trev:

and a bit of a well kept secret, or just, it sort of was just announced very

Trev:

suddenly and there was no opportunity for people to quickly acquire assets.

Scott:

No, there wasn't, because the assets and everything, if

Scott:

you didn't own it by September 1985, then you were fucked.

Trev:

Yeah, yeah.

Trev:

So, it was done in a way that stopped people from quickly buying assets

Trev:

to get in a pre CGT situation.

Trev:

No, I agree.

Trev:

And it

Scott:

was done like that.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Okay.

Trev:

Those were the days when people made decisions and said, boom, here it

Joe:

is.

Joe:

Did that have a depressionary effect on assets that people were investing in?

Scott:

I couldn't tell you.

Scott:

It's been years, so I couldn't tell you.

Scott:

It's just one of those things, like, you know, I don't understand

Scott:

why Howard had such a physic A philosophical hatred of it.

Scott:

It was just trying to take something Because it makes

Joe:

rich people less rich.

Joe:

Yes.

Scott:

I suppose so, but anyway, it's one of those things, like, see, up

Scott:

until then, there was a reason why you had to There were all these cases about

Scott:

whether or not something was capital, whether or not something was income.

Scott:

If it was capital, it was exempt from income tax because

Scott:

it was only a capital gain.

Scott:

So you didn't actually get taxed on it.

Scott:

After that, it didn't really matter because, you know, the posts, uh,

Scott:

the profit that was in excess of the inflation rate was what you paid tax on.

Trev:

Yes, wasn't it?

Trev:

Which was

Scott:

quite reasonable.

Scott:

It was, it was quite reasonable.

Scott:

And I don't understand why the hell they didn't want to actually maintain that.

Trev:

Yeah, well, you know, yeah, well, just on the essential polls

Trev:

still, you know, when we, the figure I gave before was for, um, just the

Trev:

overall sample that they took, so all people, all ages, all genders.

Trev:

And looking where it breaks up, say, by age, pretty much,

Trev:

there's not a lot of change.

Trev:

Um, people's views on, um, on getting rid of capital gain stacks and

Trev:

negative gearing, um, you know, very minor differences in the age groups.

Trev:

So, I found that interesting.

Trev:

And even in voting intention, Not a lot of difference amongst

Trev:

the different, um, groups.

Trev:

Greens, Labor, Coalition, Independents.

Trev:

You know, as far as these things go, in kind of agreement on this.

Trev:

So, we've reached a point.

Joe:

I did notice, actually, it was the 35 to 54 year olds that

Joe:

were most against any change.

Joe:

Um, uh, whereas the pensioners seem to be.

Joe:

As happy that things changed as the young people.

Trev:

Yeah, um, let me just see here, so, for the removal of the capital gains

Trev:

and the negative gearing, um, you say by age, um, so in the younger cohort,

Trev:

18 to 34, uh, 55 percent were in favour.

Trev:

Um, And in the older cohort, the 55 plus, it was still 48 percent were in

Trev:

favour of changing negative gearing and capital gains tax, so given the

Trev:

divide often in the age groups on other issues that we've looked at, I thought

Trev:

that was a relatively small difference.

Joe:

Yeah, I think it is, but I was surprised that, I was expecting

Joe:

the OEPs to be the reactionaries and go, I don't want any change.

Joe:

And it seems to be, um, 35 to 54, which is going to be families, sort of.

Joe:

You're already set up, you're in your house, and you're just

Joe:

hanging on, you don't want any depreciation of your assets, maybe.

Scott:

Which is one of the things that I do worry about, you know, because we can

Scott:

all talk about everything with housing prices and all that sort of stuff.

Scott:

However, if they do actually go down, and if they go down by a substantial

Scott:

amount, then that will depress the economy, because people will no

Scott:

longer feel as wealthy, because their housing prices have gone backwards.

Scott:

It's one of those things.

Scott:

Well, well,

Trev:

Scott, if they're not

Scott:

owning a house

Trev:

though

Scott:

If they're not owning a house, I agree, they're going to love that.

Scott:

They're going to love that, because the prices have come

Scott:

down, which will make them, make them more affordable for people.

Trev:

And that'll be a boost to the economy.

Trev:

If in fact we get to the position where more people If people don't

Trev:

own a house, then that sort of policy could be expansionary.

Trev:

Um,

Scott:

I don't see how it could be expansionary.

Scott:

It wouldn't be expansionary because all you're just doing is, you're

Scott:

taking established homes and making them belong to someone else.

Scott:

And you've also got these other people that are going to record

Scott:

losses and all that type of thing.

Scott:

And this is the other thing, Capital Gains Tax.

Scott:

You pay tax on the gain.

Scott:

You don't, you don't get a tax reduction for the loss.

Trev:

Nobody's going to suffer a loss though.

Scott:

I know that, not now, but anyway, it's one of those things.

Scott:

If you were to actually, if you were to actually depress house prices

Scott:

enough that it comes down, then, you know, you're not going to be able to.

Scott:

So you're arguing,

Joe:

one of those reports actually said, uh, that the removal of

Joe:

capital gains and negative gearing.

Joe:

create a 2 percent change in the value of houses.

Scott:

Which is no problem at all.

Joe:

Well, exactly.

Joe:

And that, yes, there would be a big shift in the ownership of houses, so people

Joe:

would get out of the investment market, but that that slack would be taken up

Joe:

by people who are currently renting.

Joe:

So really, it would have very little effect on the cost of houses.

Joe:

It just means that more people would be in, would be living

Joe:

in a house that they owned.

Scott:

Ah, John Seamans, where do you listen to Eastlake Scott?

Scott:

I listened to him on the 7am podcast this morning, they've got a Five part series on

Scott:

the housing disaster, I think it's called.

Scott:

So, yeah.

Scott:

Part one

Trev:

was today.

Trev:

It was very good.

Scott:

Yeah, part one was today.

Scott:

It's very much worth looking at, you know, worth listening to.

Scott:

It was very good.

Trev:

And the Saturday paper had an article, the Saturday paper

Trev:

and the 7am podcast are both

Scott:

Schwartz Media.

Scott:

Yeah.

Trev:

So, um, yeah, that was where that came from.

Trev:

And Salt Lake's very good.

Trev:

Um, Paying tax is

Scott:

never really reasonable according to

Trev:

Landon Hardbottom.

Trev:

Hello Landon.

Trev:

So, um, just, just on house prices then, in the same poll they asked people, Huh?

Trev:

Would you like to see house prices continue to rise, reduce, or stabilise?

Trev:

And overall, 15 percent wanted continue to rise, 45 percent wanted

Trev:

stabilise, and 40 percent of those surveyed wanted prices to reduce.

Trev:

That was a significant number, and probably matches the number

Trev:

of people who don't own a house, I would say, at this point.

Trev:

So yeah, um, that one of course, sorry Joe.

Joe:

Look, if you're a housing market, you don't care whether

Joe:

your house goes up or down, really.

Joe:

Um, but you might want it to go down for your kids.

Trev:

Yeah,

Joe:

true.

Joe:

So unless you're leaving an area, unless you're leaving the bubble, do

Joe:

you care about where the bubble is?

Trev:

Yes, true.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

What else was on here?

Trev:

Um, views on the Australian housing system.

Trev:

So, these were the options people were asked.

Trev:

Our housing system is working well, doesn't require change.

Trev:

Or, the housing system is not working in some parts and

Trev:

needs change in those areas.

Trev:

Or, the housing system is broken and needs to be fundamentally rethought.

Trev:

End.

Trev:

Only 9 percent of people thought the housing system was going well, 47

Trev:

percent wanted some tinkering, and 43 percent say the system's broken and

Trev:

needs to be fundamentally rethought.

Trev:

So, and that, um, what about being fundamentally rethought, was pretty

Trev:

much even across the age groups.

Trev:

Like, um, Uh, 42%, 45%, 44 percent from the young, middle aged to

Trev:

elderly all thought the same thing.

Trev:

So again, pretty common, unusually sort of uniform thinking by

Trev:

Australians on this issue, um, that the system has got some real problems.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

So, um.

Scott:

It's one

Trev:

of

Scott:

those things, like, you know, um.

Scott:

I know what Landon's saying, you've either got to have fewer

Scott:

people or more houses, well

Joe:

Well, the Bondi guy was trying to remedy that.

Scott:

Yeah, I know that.

Scott:

Too early,

Joe:

Joe.

Joe:

Too soon.

Scott:

It's one of those things, you can't, um, you can't actually

Scott:

You can't actually have a population that goes backwards because that

Scott:

will end up fucking up the economy.

Scott:

And if the houses and everything that we've got and that sort of stuff, if they

Scott:

become some kind of Runaway excuse to make a hell of a lot of money on, then,

Scott:

you know, it's just one of those things.

Scott:

You've just got to make a decision as to which is, which is better for you.

Scott:

You know, um, anyway, it's, I'm not sure why it has got to this sort of level

Scott:

because we have had high migration in the past and we have coped as a country.

Scott:

We have managed to put everyone in, we've managed to put everyone in

Scott:

under a roof and everything else.

Scott:

And we also managed to employ them and everything else.

Scott:

It's just, I just don't understand where it's all gone wrong.

Trev:

Well, we're trying to work that out in this podcast, aren't we?

Trev:

So we've, we've blamed, uh, negative gearing and capital gains, but, uh, we've

Trev:

blamed also land banking that we looked at last week where it's, uh, developers

Trev:

sitting on, on approvals and not actually releasing the land because to do so would

Trev:

cause a drop in prices if you had too much supply, so there's that issue, there's

Trev:

the way to counteract that is to have more public housing put onto the market

Trev:

supplied by the government because the government doesn't need to make a profit

Trev:

from it, in fact wants to depress it.

Trev:

say.

Trev:

If you were to, to get the government to be creating more public

Trev:

housing, that would be a solution.

Trev:

And in the podcast this morning, Scott, saw less like I think, or one of the

Trev:

commentators was saying how There was a significant amount of public

Trev:

housing built during the Menzies era.

Scott:

Yeah, I know.

Scott:

It's one of those things.

Scott:

It's something that Menzies was very proud of.

Trev:

Yeah, and it was the neo liberal policy of privatising everything, less

Trev:

government, that led to Australia, as well as other countries, but Australia

Trev:

in particular, pulling back and ceasing that sort of public housing.

Trev:

Um, building that had been a significant component of, of sort of the Menzies era,

Trev:

and unfortunately the tax concessions that were brought in, one of the arguments

Trev:

was it would lead to the creation of more housing, but it turns out the investors

Trev:

just bought existing houses and didn't actually create that many new houses.

Scott:

Exactly.

Scott:

It's one of those things.

Scott:

I don't understand what the hell was the problem with, um Public housing?

Scott:

No, what the hell was it?

Scott:

What the hell was the opposition leader's name at the time?

Scott:

Shorten?

Trev:

I

Scott:

don't understand what the hell, what the hell the problem

Scott:

was with his, um, with his policy.

Scott:

You know, he just said that he wasn't going to, he wasn't going to

Trev:

Murdoch didn't like it and he created a great scare campaign.

Trev:

Yeah, I know.

Trev:

And we got Morrison.

Scott:

We got Morrison instead, which is, you know, that's history.

Scott:

But you've just got to look at him.

Scott:

What he was actually saying was he just wanted to have negative gearing

Scott:

only available for new builds.

Scott:

Which honestly I think makes perfect sense.

Trev:

Um, yeah.

Trev:

Interestingly, our foreign investment laws, um, when people want to buy

Trev:

residential property, they could buy new units, for example, but they

Trev:

couldn't buy existing properties.

Trev:

So that was a way of Is that still the case?

Trev:

I'm pretty sure it would be, but I haven't looked at it for a long time.

Trev:

But, uh, that was done as a way of at least foreigners buying property

Trev:

would have to be encouraging some sort of new building.

Trev:

They couldn't buy existing ones.

Joe:

So, um, I know in London that there are laws saying that for every

Joe:

Yeah, whatever it is, ten high value apartments that you build, you have

Joe:

to buy five affordable apartments.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

Uh, and so friends in London have said, basically you get a tower block with one

Joe:

entrance on one side, which is for all the rich apartments, and one entrance on the

Joe:

other side that's for all the poor people.

Joe:

Well, at least it's there.

Joe:

Well, absolutely.

Joe:

It's basically saying, yeah, to get approval for X number of houses,

Joe:

you have to provide affordable housing in an equivalent amount.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

There was an article in the John Menendee blog by a guy, Michael Keating.

Trev:

He put forward some interesting ideas.

Trev:

Um, One of them was looking at the increase in population versus the increase

Trev:

in the number of dwellings since 2017.

Trev:

And um, over the last seven years, the increase in the number of dwellings has

Trev:

exceeded the rate of population growth.

Trev:

So, um, so, where people like Peter Dutton want to blame immigration

Trev:

for the housing crisis, he's got the statistics that show that

Joe:

basically How many kids does Dutton have?

Trev:

Yeah, I don't know.

Joe:

Well, maybe it's his fault for breeding too many.

Scott:

See, that's one of the things that I just don't understand, is that if

Scott:

they actually looked back on the proudest days of the Liberal Party, which was

Scott:

when Menzies was in charge, apparently, you know, you've just got to look at us.

Scott:

We were awash with migrants.

Scott:

We were awash with public housing.

Scott:

We did those two things at once.

Scott:

Why the hell aren't they trying to copy that again?

Trev:

Mmm, yeah.

Trev:

Another statistic he gave here was the increase in house prices and the

Trev:

increase in dwelling construction costs.

Trev:

And, somewhere like Melbourne, for example, between 2002 and 2010,

Trev:

median house price increased by 8.

Trev:

6%, but dwelling construction costs Increased by 4.6%.

Trev:

So that meant the land cost increased by 4%.

Trev:

Um, in the following 10 years, the Melbourne million

Trev:

house price increased 4.5%.

Trev:

Construction costs increased 2.4.

Trev:

That meant that the land increased, had to be 2.1.

Trev:

And from, um, 2020 to 2023, the median house price in Melbourne Rose 18%.

Trev:

Dwelling construction costs rose 7.

Trev:

7, so basically the cost of land increased by 11.

Trev:

3.

Trev:

So some of these statistics show, okay, we've had some periods of high

Trev:

construction costs, but there's also been in there periods of very high

Trev:

increase in the actual land component, not just the cost of housing.

Trev:

So, um So that's adding more information to the puzzle of why prices have gone

Trev:

up and he argues that we need more higher density sort of suburbs using

Trev:

less land, therefore Yeah, I agree.

Trev:

Yeah, makes sense.

Trev:

It's

Scott:

one of those things that when my, when my place was in Brisbane and that

Scott:

sort of stuff, that was supposed to be zoned for units and that type of thing,

Scott:

but um, the LNP government knocked that on the head and they said you can only

Scott:

have units up on the um, Logan Road.

Scott:

So anything that was off Logan Road was deemed to be,

Scott:

you gotta have bigger blocks.

Trev:

So

Scott:

I was able to split my block, but yeah, it's just one of those things.

Trev:

Um, in the same article, makes the point, first homeowner grants, um,

Trev:

stamp duty exemptions, things like that, they just, uh, don't lead to poor people

Trev:

getting houses, they just lead to higher house prices, because these people are

Trev:

now competing with each other, so if you give them a 50, 000, um, Sort of both.

Joe:

Or robbing your superannuation.

Trev:

Yes.

Joe:

It just means you have less superannuation.

Joe:

Yes.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

So, um, so yeah.

Trev:

And then in the Saturday paper was an article, The Men and Decisions Behind

Trev:

Australia's Housing Crisis, And that sort of was, um, following along the same lines

Trev:

as the podcast you listened to, uh, Scott.

Trev:

One of the interesting anecdotes in that was that, um, Howard was

Trev:

interviewed on a radio program, um, And, um, so, yeah, Brisbane Radio,

Trev:

2003, John Howard was being interviewed.

Trev:

Since the election of the coalition government, uh, seven years

Trev:

earlier, house prices had doubled.

Trev:

And Howard's interviewer wanted to know what the government

Trev:

planned to do about it.

Trev:

And he, Howard said nothing.

Trev:

Howard said, quote, I haven't found anybody in seven and a half years

Trev:

shake their fist at me and say, Howard, I'm angry with you for letting

Trev:

the value of my house increase.

Trev:

And, um, So that's been sort of cited with frequency over time, but the,

Trev:

um, There was actually something that followed that statement and the

Trev:

interviewer responded and said well Let me be the first to complain.

Trev:

People like myself are actually being forced to face the possibility

Trev:

We may be renting for the rest of our lives because getting into, and

Trev:

he was interrupted at that point, and Howard said Do you own a home?

Trev:

And the host said, no, I rent.

Trev:

And Howard said, no, well, I'm sorry.

Trev:

I was talking about people who own a home.

Trev:

So essentially his concern was only for people who owned a home and,

Trev:

uh, well, nobody's complained to me.

Trev:

And the interviewer is saying, well, I want to

Joe:

complain.

Trev:

And Howard goes,

Joe:

well, also, I suspect.

Joe:

Brisbane prices went up in that period because they were incredibly

Joe:

undervalued because of Sir Joe's legacy.

Joe:

Yeah, possibly.

Joe:

And people finally realised, the southern states finally

Joe:

realised that Sir Joe was gone.

Trev:

Mm.

Joe:

And that they could take their money from selling a Sydney or Melbourne

Joe:

house and retire on the difference.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

Mm.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

But at that point At that point, it made sense politically for Howard

Trev:

to favour people who owned a home, because they were the majority.

Trev:

And you got the most votes by pandering to that cohort.

Scott:

But now that majority has got their adult children still living with

Scott:

them at home, it's starting to turn.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

This is just one of the ongoing problems about the boomer generation

Trev:

is that they were such a large voting bloc who by age and circumstances had

Trev:

similar interests that governments were forced around the world to kind of.

Trev:

You know, uh, okay, all those guys are educated, let's now charge people

Trev:

for their university degrees, because it's not affecting the boomers.

Trev:

Let's now introduce superannuation, because that's what the boomers want.

Trev:

And just a range of policy decisions that were made, um, uh,

Trev:

with an eye to democracy, Scott.

Trev:

You know, like, we make decisions.

Trev:

That best help the majority of people.

Joe:

The tyranny of the majority?

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

Tyranny of the mass?

Joe:

I can't remember all the phrases.

Trev:

But unfortunately that meant a particular large voting group

Trev:

got particular favours and that was perhaps detrimental to the

Trev:

long term viability of the country.

Trev:

That's sort of one of the failings of a democracy.

Scott:

Yeah, but I'd still prefer to live in Australia's failed democracy than

Scott:

live in the People's Republic of China.

Trev:

Yeah, but I'm just saying it's one of the Or the

Scott:

Russian Federation.

Trev:

Yeah, yeah, but I'm just, um, just saying it's one of the things to consider.

Trev:

Hmm.

Trev:

Um, uh, what else did it say in here?

Trev:

Um, when Howard came into power, 42 percent of people Owned their home,

Trev:

free and clear, with no mortgage, 42%, um, and 28 percent had mortgages.

Trev:

Um,

Joe:

let me just see, uh, yeah, but they were mortgages of 18%.

Joe:

It was a different mortgage than you get these days.

Joe:

Yeah,

Scott:

they weren't that high back then.

Scott:

You know, it's, it's one of those things.

Scott:

It's the boomers would love to, we'd love to have you believe that they paid

Scott:

22 percent interest on a 400, 000 house.

Scott:

They paid 22 percent interest on a six on a 60, 000 mortgage.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

You know?

Trev:

Um, so in 2002, the average retirement age was 55.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Yeah, that was low, wasn't it?

Trev:

It was very low, but you know, it's,

Scott:

it's, what's going on in this world?

Scott:

I don't know.

Scott:

We're going backwards.

Scott:

I'm very, very pissed off about it because it's one of those things

Scott:

I just think to myself, you know.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

In a happier bygone era, I'd be thinking to myself, I've only

Scott:

got five years left of this shit.

Scott:

So, you know.

Trev:

Oh, that was the other thing.

Trev:

As the boomers have got older, the retirement age has been bumped up.

Trev:

Yeah,

Scott:

and they have bumped it up and up and up.

Scott:

And I just think to myself, if you actually want to solve the

Scott:

youth unemployment problem in this country, you've actually got to

Scott:

encourage some of those boomers.

Scott:

To pull outta the workforce now.

Trev:

Mm.

Trev:

Okay.

Trev:

Let me just finish the statistic here.

Trev:

2012, average retirement age was 55 and only 4% of homeowners aged over

Trev:

65 carried mortgage debt by 2020.

Trev:

So 18 years later, the average retirement age was 64 and more

Trev:

than 50% of homeowners, um, aged 55 to 64 still had mortgage debt.

Trev:

So within 20 years.

Trev:

Significant mortgage debt on those people.

Trev:

Hmm.

Trev:

Hmm.

Trev:

Ah, what else have we got here?

Trev:

Um,

Trev:

uh, oh, negative gearing.

Trev:

So, one of the arguments is that if you were to get rid of negative

Trev:

gearing, then rents would go up.

Trev:

And, you may ask yourself, dear listener, well we'll never know,

Trev:

will we, until it actually happens.

Trev:

And in this article they make the point that there's, the experiment has already

Trev:

been run, so the Hawke government, um, dropped negative gearing in 1985, and

Trev:

reinstated it in 1987, following sharp rises in rents in Sydney and Perth.

Trev:

So that seems to be an argument against abolishing negative gearing.

Trev:

But Saul S Lake and others point out that, um, rises in those two cities, Sydney and

Trev:

Perth, were a consequence of a shortage of supply and contrary to that Adelaide

Trev:

rents actually fell and the abolition had no impact anywhere else in the country.

Trev:

So if you want to take that experiment and the word of Saul S Lake, their negative

Trev:

gearing, if it was to be, dropped.

Trev:

would not lead to increases in rent.

Trev:

So at the time, Labor buckled in the face of a thorough, well, in what Saul

Trev:

Eslake calls a thoroughly dishonest campaign by the opposition leader, John

Trev:

Howard, uh, invested property interests, uh, in the usual media suspects.

Trev:

And they restored negative gearing and of course introduced

Trev:

a halving of the capital gains.

Trev:

So, um, What else is in this article that's of interest?

Trev:

Um, we've mentioned before how much it costs to have these deductions.

Trev:

Um,

Joe:

I

Trev:

told you

Joe:

about land valuation, by the way.

Joe:

Uh, what part was that, Joe?

Joe:

My, my recent land valuation went up 30%.

Joe:

Yeah, it's two years.

Joe:

So it's 15 percent per annum.

Joe:

Congratulations.

Joe:

No, not really.

Joe:

It means absolutely nothing.

Joe:

Congratulations

Trev:

on your higher rates, Phil.

Trev:

Pass that on to your tenants.

Trev:

Oh wait, you don't have any.

Joe:

Exactly.

Joe:

Can't claim it on negative

Trev:

gearing either.

Trev:

Uh, anything else of interest in this?

Trev:

Um, I think that's enough sort of stuff to have in your head at the moment

Trev:

about, uh, oh, here's an interesting one.

Trev:

In the seven years to the mid 2019, the median Sydney home Earned more

Trev:

than the median full time worker.

Trev:

So basically the average Sydney home in a seven year period increased in

Trev:

value at a yearly rate greater than the average median full time worker.

Joe:

And it only paid half the tax on that.

Trev:

Yes, indeed.

Trev:

There's some amazing statistics, isn't there?

Trev:

Um, yeah.

Trev:

Um, uh,

Joe:

what else was there?

Joe:

Well, it would be interesting to put together how much foregone tax, negative

Joe:

gearing and halving the capital gains.

Scott:

Um, it hasn't actually halved the capital gains tax because, you

Scott:

know, you would assume that you would be paying tax on 100 percent of the gain.

Scott:

You never were.

Scott:

You were only paying tax on the post inflationary gain.

Scott:

Yes.

Scott:

Which was probably 80 to 90 percent of what you were paying.

Scott:

So you've probably cut it by around about 30%.

Scott:

You haven't actually halved it.

Trev:

Well, according to this article, negative gearing costs 27 billion per

Trev:

annum and the cap, the CGT discount costs 19 billion per annum, uh, 20

Trev:

or 30, roughly 50 billion per annum.

Trev:

How many subs is that?

Trev:

50 billion used to get you 12 subs, and at that time it was outrageous.

Scott:

Yeah, but now you're talking about 300 billion for 10, wasn't it?

Trev:

That you'll, that we'll never get.

Scott:

Yeah, exactly.

Scott:

Uh,

Trev:

360 Yeah, so that's

Joe:

30 billion a sub.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

So yeah, uh, 50 billion a year, um, is what that's cost us.

Trev:

So one and a half submarines a year.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Look, you know, it's actually It's probably 10 Japanese

Trev:

subs a year, isn't it?

Trev:

Yeah,

Scott:

exactly.

Trev:

Ah, okay, um

Joe:

So what's the question, that now the Japanese are joining Orcus?

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

Do we get a discount on the subs?

Trev:

Maybe we could get Japanese subs now.

Joe:

Well, no, no, it's more, can we get a group rate?

Trev:

Between Japan and us, yeah.

Trev:

But Japan makes their own.

Trev:

They don't need to buy them.

Trev:

Yeah,

Scott:

but Japan doesn't make nuclear powered submarines.

Scott:

Well, exactly.

Scott:

So why are they joining AUKUS, if not?

Trev:

Because JAUKUS just sounds so good.

Scott:

No, they are joining to get access to American

Scott:

technology, which is hypersonic missiles and that type of thing.

Scott:

And they're also joining to get a greater air defence shield

Scott:

and everything like that.

Scott:

It's just, um, And they really don't like the Chinese.

Scott:

Well, they really don't like the Chinese, but they do have a

Scott:

fairly vexed history with China.

Scott:

Now, I know Japan started that war, but China has never forgiven them for it.

Scott:

No, they're

Trev:

very, they're very bitter

Scott:

about that.

Scott:

Oh God, yeah, they are very bitter about it.

Trev:

I remember my, um, homestay boys, Chinese, were very bitter about Japan.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

It's one of those things, like, you know, I was in China, I don't

Scott:

know, when I went over there years ago to go visit my brother.

Scott:

And there was a, um, there was a television show that was highlighting

Scott:

the atrocities committed by Japan.

Scott:

And they had it in, they had English subtitles, Japanese

Scott:

subtitles, Korean subtitles.

Scott:

They had all the subtitles on there just to actually try and get the message across

Scott:

that the Japanese were bastards, you know?

Trev:

Yeah, they're big on that.

Trev:

I've

Scott:

got no doubt that they were pricks to them, for sure.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Um, actually in this article there was another interesting, um, anecdote,

Trev:

uh, so, around Halloween, uh, October 31, 2020, we had, uh, big, uh, storms

Trev:

in South East Queensland cause a billion dollars worth of damage.

Trev:

A lot of that was down sort of Springfield way, as I recall.

Trev:

Just, just every house in the suburb lost, you know, badly damaged

Trev:

roof, uh, lots of hail damage.

Trev:

And what he says is, it took two weeks for the increase in demand for

Trev:

roof plumbers in Brisbane to hit the price of roof plumbers in Melbourne.

Trev:

It literally just swept down the country.

Trev:

So incredible demand for roof plumbers in Brisbane.

Trev:

And um, Two weeks later, in Melbourne, uh, price of roof plumbers went up.

Trev:

Anyway, um, all these interesting things that come into play, um,

Joe:

So the two weeks was for the southerners to realise there was a quick

Joe:

buck to be made and jump on a plane?

Trev:

Yes, or they could simply say to their boss, Um, well, you pay

Trev:

me extra or I will go on a plane to Brisbane and, um, I've got two

Trev:

years worth of work up there at this crazy rate, so you have to match it.

Joe:

I remember when the cyclone came into Yippoon, and a mate of mine who is

Joe:

up there said, a big truck turned up two days after whilst things were still shit,

Joe:

um, filled up with Bunnings generators.

Joe:

That he'd bought at 500 pound, uh, 500 a pop at Bunnings in Brisbane, stuck on

Joe:

the back of a truck, drove up to Rocky, and was flogging him at 2000 a pop.

Joe:

Right.

Trev:

Because the power lines were down

Joe:

there.

Trev:

There you go, yeah.

Scott:

What a prick.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Anyway, uh, so that's more information to put in your kit bag about trying to

Trev:

explain Australia's housing situation.

Trev:

Yeah,

Scott:

I, I just, I still don't think that negative gearing is entirely to

Scott:

blame because Canada doesn't have negative gearing and Canada is also suffering the

Scott:

same sort of housing crisis that we are.

Trev:

Now

Scott:

I can't remember which city is, I think it's Vancouver where prices have

Scott:

shot up ridiculously high over there.

Scott:

Just one city?

Scott:

I don't know if it's just one city or whether there's all the cities.

Scott:

It's just, it is what it is.

Scott:

It's, I, I, you know, I'm not, I've got a negatively geared

Scott:

property in South Ripley.

Scott:

There's no doubt about that.

Scott:

So it could be, you could be ignoring everything I have to say here, but

Scott:

it's just, I just don't think it's entirely the fault of negative gearing.

Scott:

I think it is, I think it is certainly to blame, but it is not entirely to blame.

Scott:

Well,

Trev:

that's the whole point of this conversation is we're

Trev:

saying there's a whole host of.

Trev:

Factors involved.

Trev:

Oh God, yeah.

Trev:

There's a shit load of

Scott:

Hef.

Scott:

There's a shit load of factors involved.

Trev:

And, and the, um, podcast with 7:00 AM made a good point

Trev:

about culture that Australia has, you know, for various reasons

Trev:

become a, a culture of, of property speculators and of DIY improvement.

Trev:

So we are way into DIY improvement much more than a lot of other

Trev:

cultures around the world.

Scott:

I agree.

Scott:

But,

Trev:

but also.

Joe:

Um, our rental system is set up for short term rentals.

Joe:

So, uh, yeah, I've got a friend who's just moved into an apartment

Joe:

in Germany, and the landlord was basically talking about ten years time.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

Yep.

Joe:

Yeah, the expectation was that, and it's, it's, it's a studio.

Joe:

It's not even a one bedroom apartment.

Trev:

Right.

Joe:

And, you know, I wouldn't expect anyone to be in a studio for ten years.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

You'd be thinking you're going to be married and have a family and

Joe:

you can't have kids in a studio.

Joe:

You want a slightly bigger place.

Joe:

But yeah, the assumption was that he was going to be in there long term.

Joe:

There was, there was no, this is a six month lease.

Joe:

And at the end of six months, we're going to jack your rent up.

Scott:

You can't even do that now.

Scott:

You've got to wait 12 months between rent increases to

Scott:

actually increase the rent again.

Scott:

It's just, hmm.

Trev:

All right.

Trev:

Um, some good news.

Trev:

Uh, Scott Morrison has been busy signing copies of his book, Plans for Your Good.

Trev:

Um, it's hot off the presses.

Trev:

You can pre order your copy today from Booktopia.

Trev:

Are

Joe:

you going to read it and review it for us, Trev?

Trev:

No, I'll wait till it's, I'll wait till it's in the 2 bin.

Trev:

Hmm.

Trev:

I won't have to wait long.

Scott:

No, I just think I'll just go borrow it from the library because I

Scott:

just don't, I'm not really interested in giving that bastard any more money.

Scott:

You know, I, anyway, once we get off air, I'll tell you a story up here.

Scott:

Oh, okay.

Scott:

All right.

Scott:

That's not really salacious or anything like that.

Scott:

Anyway.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

Okay.

Scott:

You'll make baby Jesus cry.

Scott:

No, it's not gonna make baby Jesus cry.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Um, I won't go into it.

Trev:

There was an article by Alan Patience in the John Menendew blog, um, basically

Trev:

talking about how with elections now, one third Labor, one third, uh, Liberal

Trev:

National and one third Independents, Teal or Green or Jackie Lambie or whatever.

Trev:

And.

Trev:

That we're moving away from what was the case, and Guy Rundle wrote a piece in

Trev:

Crikey looking at the Tasmanian situation.

Trev:

So, the Tasmanian Premier pulled an early election.

Trev:

Uh, they changed the number of parliamentarians and increased it, but the

Trev:

Liberal vote didn't match that increase.

Trev:

And they're kind of a parliament that's a bit of a one third, one third, one third.

Trev:

And, uh, the Liberal government is forming a rough coalition with the

Trev:

Jackie Lambie Network and seems to have enough to guarantee supply.

Trev:

Labor refused to get into an agreement with the Greens.

Trev:

Just point blank refused.

Trev:

Yeah,

Scott:

I know, which is one of the things that I do not understand, but it

Scott:

makes me think that perhaps we're not part, we're not privy to what the Greens

Scott:

actually do when they get into government.

Joe:

Or maybe we're not privy with how right wing Labor are.

Trev:

Yes.

Scott:

That's also a possibility.

Trev:

Guy Rundle's theory was that the Liberals and Labor are much closer in

Trev:

ideology than any of the other groups.

Trev:

And in fact, there should be a grand coalition of Liberal and Labor with

Trev:

the Greens as the genuine opposition.

Trev:

It's just that they couldn't bring themselves to admit

Trev:

how close they actually are.

Trev:

He doesn't say it in so few words, it's a bit more flowery, but, uh,

Trev:

You know, this is what happens when you talk about Europe and renting.

Trev:

Well, over there, there's a lot more of these sorts of, um, mixtures of

Trev:

coalitions of, uh, Yeah, there are.

Trev:

And we're hitting that one.

Trev:

Yeah,

Joe:

but then you also get the case of Israel, which was very much a proportional

Joe:

representation and they were held to ransom by The right wing conservatives,

Scott:

so that's where Likud had to go in with them and they have now reaped

Scott:

what they've sown, you know, I would have thought that if Benny, whatever

Scott:

his name was, Prime Minister and that sort of stuff, this war would have been

Scott:

over months ago because I think he would have flattened Gaza and he was, no,

Scott:

whatever his name is, Benny Gantz, was it?

Scott:

Was that the?

Scott:

Oh, okay.

Scott:

I don't know.

Scott:

I would have thought that if he was the Prime Minister over there, they would

Scott:

have flattened Gaza and then they were pulled out and they would have said,

Scott:

right, you want these borders open again?

Scott:

Give us back our people.

Scott:

You know?

Scott:

Because I just don't see the point in continuously bombing

Trev:

the Isn't that the first part of the plan you just mentioned?

Trev:

Flatten Gaza?

Trev:

Aren't they still doing that?

Trev:

Yeah,

Scott:

I know, but they've flattened Just haven't quite finished it?

Scott:

They could have actually stopped.

Scott:

You know, they could have flattened it and then they could have stopped,

Scott:

but instead they've got this obsession with going in and, you know, rooting

Scott:

everything out and all that sort of stuff.

Scott:

And I think to myself, you know, Hamas was a creation of the Israeli

Scott:

government because they wanted something that was against Fatah.

Scott:

You know, it's, uh.

Trev:

Okay.

Trev:

Well, let's talk about, uh, Gaza and the Middle East.

Trev:

So Iran recently, in the last few days, uh, sent a bunch of, uh, Missiles slash

Trev:

drones plus firecrackers across to Israel who were busy with their Iron

Trev:

Dome intercepting those objects and some got through, but apparently there

Trev:

was only one injury from that entire, um, project, which seems extraordinary.

Trev:

So, the coverage of this has been Affected by the, you know, the stabbings in Bondi.

Trev:

So here in Australia, you know, turning on the news, not

Trev:

a lot has been said about it.

Trev:

But, what, if you do look at the news, and you, or you read a Murdoch paper,

Trev:

because that's the only goddamn paper out there, or Fairfax, which who are

Trev:

just as bad, you Um, and they talk about, um, you know, everybody in the world has

Trev:

been warning Iran, don't do it, don't send missiles, but they did it anyway,

Trev:

and this is just a, goddamn Iranians.

Joe:

Well,

Trev:

uh,

Joe:

I, I read a thought that they gave them plenty of warning, they knew

Joe:

that the Iron Dome was going to stop them, effectively this was Iran, uh,

Joe:

Iran showing, uh, Not the saving face.

Joe:

They'd been attacked.

Joe:

They had to save face.

Joe:

Correct.

Joe:

This was the way of doing it.

Trev:

And how had they been attacked, Joe?

Scott:

Because they had their

Trev:

embassy blown up in Damascus.

Trev:

In Syria?

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

You would not know that that happened in Australia.

Trev:

Well, I knew about it.

Trev:

Well, how did you know?

Trev:

Because I read it on the ABC weeks ago when it happened.

Trev:

It's, so, so when Iran retaliated.

Trev:

It was because the Israelis attacked, uh, their embassy.

Trev:

It was actually the building beside the embassy, technically, I think.

Trev:

But, you know, with the intent of, and killed a number of people.

Trev:

And, and people are expressing shock and horror at the Iranians retaliating.

Trev:

Just imagine if somebody had, you know, Had done that to a US embassy anywhere on

Trev:

the planet, there'd be no question about the retaliation that would be expected.

Joe:

That then, then Hillary Clinton would be blamed.

Joe:

Yes.

Joe:

Hmm.

Scott:

Yes.

Scott:

But it just It's one of those things, you know, I just don't understand why the

Scott:

hell they decided to bomb that embassy.

Scott:

You know, it's, I just think to myself, that bastard is trying to,

Scott:

he's trying to extend this war.

Scott:

He's trying to keep them going and that sort of stuff.

Scott:

He's trying to drag the Yanks into it.

Trev:

Yeah.

Scott:

But I was very pleased that Biden has already said, no, the

Scott:

Israelis are on their own over this.

Trev:

Apparently that's a red line that was never crossed in any previous sort

Trev:

of world wars or major conflicts of,

Joe:

of

Trev:

attacking your enemies.

Trev:

Consulate like that in another country.

Joe:

Not by a nation state, no.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

So.

Trev:

By terrorists.

Trev:

Yes, but not by a nation state.

Trev:

So I think Israel has yet to claim responsibility, but the

Trev:

USA said, yep, Israel did it, so.

Scott:

Yeah, the Yanks have said Israel did it, so they're on their own.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

And there are all these warnings given because, um, different Western

Trev:

powers were citing to their citizens.

Trev:

Do not go anywhere near these areas.

Trev:

Um, it was because the Iranians had said we're going to send some bombs

Trev:

as a retaliation, uh, missiles.

Trev:

And anyway, they've sent them and they've said, uh, that's it.

Trev:

The project's over as far as we're concerned.

Trev:

Um, it was in retaliation for what was done to us and, uh, we're done now.

Trev:

We're not doing any more, but

Joe:

that's They have said to Israel, don't retaliate for the retaliation.

Trev:

Yes.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

So Which I don't blame them for.

Trev:

Interesting move by the Iranians.

Trev:

Yeah, of course,

Scott:

it was a very interesting move by them.

Trev:

Yeah, so, um, um, yeah.

Trev:

Headline in the New York Times, Israel bombed an Iranian embassy complex.

Trev:

Is that allowed?

Trev:

And Alan McLeod makes the point.

Trev:

Imagine if Iran just bombed the Israeli embassy in DC.

Trev:

Would anybody be asking if it was legal?

Trev:

Good point.

Trev:

Um, just a dearth of background material on that.

Trev:

And, um, You know, I saw comments by um, Penny Wong urging Iran not to

Trev:

escalate the conflict and when they did, Albanese decried Iran's actions

Trev:

and said, um, Iran has ignored our call and those of many other countries not

Trev:

to proceed with these reckless attacks.

Trev:

Anyone who cares for the protection of innocent life must

Trev:

stand against these attacks.

Trev:

Albanese continues, this escalation is a grave threat to the security

Trev:

of Israel and the entire region.

Trev:

It risks greater instability and devastation.

Trev:

And he says, Iran's ongoing flouting of international law, its

Trev:

egregious human rights abuses and threat to international security.

Trev:

Is why this government has imposed targeted financial sanctions

Trev:

and travel bans, he said.

Trev:

Now, I googled and tried to find anything where Australia condemned Israel for

Trev:

the bombing of the Iranian embassy in Damascus and I couldn't find anything.

Trev:

So, it's just the hypocrisy and the double standards, um, that just are annoying.

Trev:

Again, that might have been affected by the fact The, uh, bombing of Damascus

Trev:

Embassy, or the Embassy in Damascus, was on the 1st of April and that was

Trev:

around, the very next day was when that aid worker was killed, uh, Zomi?

Trev:

Yeah, it

Scott:

could well have, yeah, Zomi, whatever her name was.

Trev:

So again, the media was just full of, of that tragedy and not much about an

Trev:

Iranian embassy being hit by the Israelis.

Scott:

Yeah, was it done with, um, how'd they do it?

Scott:

They do it by aircraft or they do it by, um, cruise missiles?

Trev:

Not sure how it was done.

Trev:

I can't, I'm not sure.

Joe:

Usually it's, um, aircraft.

Joe:

The attack on the, um, nuclear processing plant was aircraft.

Trev:

Ah, what else have we got on this, um, oh.

Trev:

I showed image on one episode of those guys who were hit by.

Trev:

You know, walking along, there's some terrible stuff you can see online.

Trev:

One is, um, this one is reported extensively in a Guardian article.

Trev:

But, um, Israeli soldiers taking potshots at a starved Garzan clinging

Trev:

to a bag of airdropped food aid.

Trev:

Um, The soldiers wounded him repeatedly.

Trev:

He kept struggling to crawl to safety and they continued shooting for

Trev:

no reason until they murdered him.

Trev:

Cold blooded murder in broad daylight.

Trev:

You can see that on Twitter.

Trev:

And what's another example here?

Trev:

Uh, uh, just, just going back to the Australian aid worker who was

Trev:

killed and You know, like, the uproar here in Australia by our

Trev:

government, saying, This is outrageous.

Trev:

The Israelis have crossed the line here.

Trev:

I demand an explanation.

Trev:

How dare this happen?

Trev:

30, 000 Palestinians die, and nowhere near the Yes, but they're not Australians.

Trev:

I know, it's so pathetic to be so parochial into just Ignore 30, 000 people

Trev:

being killed, but then get all, um, just the reaction when one Australian does.

Trev:

It's really so small minded.

Trev:

I mean, by all means express the outrage for the Aussie aid worker

Trev:

being killed, but a proportionate amount of outrage for the 30, 000

Trev:

Palestinians who've been killed.

Trev:

Might be nice or consistent.

Trev:

You know, by the way, why was she there?

Trev:

Potentially because Australia had pulled back its funding of UNRWA.

Trev:

So groups like the ones she was with had to come in and, and,

Trev:

uh, sort of fill that void,

Scott:

fill

Trev:

that void.

Trev:

So, you know, is Australia partially responsible?

Trev:

There's a drone that killed her.

Trev:

was by a company that Australia is paying big sums of money to, as part

Trev:

of an agreement between, um, so getting sort of, uh, military supplies from.

Trev:

So, something like, oh, where is it here?

Trev:

Um, so, yeah, the lady's name was Zomi Franken.

Trev:

Killed by a drone, and we're, we're handing 900 million dollars to the

Trev:

company that helped murder her.

Trev:

So, the Israeli arms company that provided the tools for the murder, um,

Trev:

will be handed 900 million dollars.

Trev:

Yes, but guns don't

Joe:

kill people.

Trev:

People kill people.

Trev:

Yes, um.

Trev:

This is from an article in Crikey, and In February, in February, the ABC revealed

Trev:

the Defence Department had awarded Elbit Systems a 917 million contract despite

Trev:

equipment previously supplied by the company being torn out of Australian

Trev:

systems due to national security concerns and um, so they're going to be

Trev:

handsomely rewarded by Australians Was there any mention that, hey, Albanese,

Trev:

if you're so outraged by the murder of this Australian, do we reconsider paying

Trev:

900 million dollars to the company that supplied the drone that killed her?

Trev:

People like Richard Miles just simply refuse to respond when people like

Trev:

Crikey ask questions like that.

Trev:

Um, uh,

Joe:

Well, they just made the weapon, they didn't target it.

Trev:

Yeah, just, all the, all the outrage, but when you can do something,

Trev:

they're not prepared to do it.

Trev:

Um, The Onion had an interesting headline, satirical, it's like The

Trev:

Chaser or like, uh, The Batuta Advocate, headline in The Onion, Israel warns Gaza

Trev:

still harbouring hundreds of doctors.

Trev:

I mean, they're killing just hundreds of doctors, they're, ah,

Trev:

what else have we got here, we've got um Mind you, so's the NHS.

Trev:

Yes, but there's articles where doctors, both Palestinian and

Trev:

foreigners, are saying, look, lots of kids are killed by, you know, uh,

Trev:

bombs and by rubble falling on them.

Trev:

But we're also seeing groups of kids just brought in with gunshot wounds to the head

Trev:

and no other adult victims and the snipers are just picking off kids in the streets.

Trev:

Um, and then various reports by Palestinians and Twitter videos

Trev:

of, of, of people lying injured in the middle of the street.

Trev:

Bystanders unable to move to the middle of the street to try

Trev:

and pull them out of harm's way.

Trev:

And the snipers just continuing to take potshots at them.

Trev:

Like, it is dystopian what is going on there.

Trev:

Um, what else have we got?

Trev:

Places like Germany.

Trev:

There was a professor, um, who's Jewish.

Trev:

She's been disinvited from a guest professorship in Germany for signing a

Trev:

public letter in support of Palestine.

Trev:

The letter was just a pretty simple, um, document about supporting Palestine

Trev:

for the most obvious of reasons.

Trev:

Uh, she's been banned from her position.

Trev:

Yiannis Varoufakis.

Trev:

Has been, um, there's just been an order made against him, a ban on any political

Trev:

activity in Germany, Fiatus, because of his support for the Palestinians.

Trev:

And it's not just a ban on visiting Germany, but also

Trev:

from participating via Zoom.

Trev:

So, so some pretty heavy censorship occurring in Germany.

Trev:

Because,

Scott:

you know, anybody who's Germany feels a hell of a lot of

Scott:

guilt over this second world war.

Scott:

And they actually feel personally responsible for the Holocaust.

Scott:

And I just think to myself, it's time for them to get over that too.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

You know, because they are a modern, fully functional democracy

Scott:

now and that sort of thing.

Scott:

They can still have the history, but they've got to actually move on from

Trev:

it.

Trev:

There's reports of the Israelis using AI for targeting of, um, people.

Trev:

And also reports where When they've sort of located the activities of

Trev:

junior Hamas operatives, they've preferred to kill them in their

Trev:

homes rather than out in the field.

Trev:

Um, this is a method of war.

Trev:

And, uh, yeah, there's an extensive article in the Guardian about

Trev:

snipers targeting children.

Trev:

And, uh, gores.

Trev:

You guys, when you put, like, a bandage on Referred to as gauze, um, so it

Trev:

comes from, um, Gaza, because Gazans were skilled weavers for centuries.

Trev:

So that's where the word gauze comes from.

Trev:

Um, what else we got here in this just litany of disasters,

Trev:

so, ah, it's just incredible

Trev:

Brutality, uh, cold blooded killing, and, um, it's just continuing

Trev:

right in front of our faces.

Trev:

And it's not stopping, these people are now starving, um, oh, you know,

Trev:

allegations, even someone like Bob Carr, former New South Wales Premier

Trev:

said, You know, that attack on the Australian aid worker was probably to

Trev:

scare off and stop aid workers operating.

Trev:

So, in his view, it was an intentional act to scare off aid workers and to

Trev:

reduce the level of aid going into Israel.

Trev:

Not just some simple mistake.

Trev:

Um, you just couldn't put anything beyond them at this point.

Trev:

On the whole, they're doing terrible things.

Trev:

The Australian government has been very limited in its response.

Trev:

Um, Australian government is sending over a guy to talk to the Israelis to

Trev:

investigate the murder of that aid worker.

Scott:

Well, he's not going over to investigate.

Scott:

He's going over to advise the government on the investigation.

Scott:

Right.

Scott:

So he's going to actually be the Australian witness for the

Scott:

investigation and that sort of stuff.

Scott:

So he's going to be sitting in on meetings and all that type of thing.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

Good luck with that.

Trev:

Exactly.

Trev:

Um, yeah.

Trev:

And meanwhile I

Joe:

hope he speaks Hebrew.

Joe:

Hmm.

Joe:

Because what's the odds all the meetings won't be in English?

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

No, they won't be in English.

Scott:

They'll be in Hebrew.

Joe:

Yeah.

Trev:

And there we go.

Trev:

Yeah.

Trev:

A complete disaster, Australia doing nothing about it and in fact paying

Trev:

big money to the company that's made the drone that killed the Australian.

Trev:

And uh, meanwhile, criticise the Iranians, um, who are retaliating

Trev:

because their embassy was bombed by the Israelis, so they go to town

Trev:

criticising them, but not the Israelis.

Trev:

It's all so two faced, it's all so hypocritical,

Trev:

hypocritical, quite depressing.

Trev:

I don't know.

Trev:

And, uh, and there we go, that is another, um, episode.

Trev:

So, ah, alright Baldy listener, sorry for the audio last week.

Trev:

I'll try and fix that up, so long term it'll be better.

Trev:

But, uh, anyway, we'll be back next week.

Trev:

We'll talk to you then.

Trev:

Bye for now.

Trev:

And it's a good night from me.

Joe:

And it's a good night from him.

Trev:

Good night.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube