The discourse delves into the profound philosophical inquiry surrounding the potential for humans to transcend their inherent animalistic instincts. The speakers engage in a contemplative dialogue, probing whether it is feasible for humanity to rise above its primal nature. The conversation reveals a dichotomy in perspectives: on one hand, the assertion that elevating oneself may evoke notions of superiority, while on the other, the recognition that such elevation could lead to a clearer understanding of one's environment. This notion of ascendance is likened to achieving a heightened awareness, akin to gaining a panoramic view from an elevated vantage point. The discussion further extends to the implications of overcoming these basal traits, suggesting that such transcendence could mitigate societal issues such as violence and discrimination, thereby fostering a more harmonious coexistence among individuals. As the dialogue progresses, the speakers explore the relationship between human behavior and the instinctual patterns observed in the animal kingdom. They ponder the question of whether animals, unencumbered by constructs such as racism, possess a more profound connection to the natural order. This leads to an exploration of the complexities surrounding human social constructs versus animal instincts. The conversation is enriched by analogies drawn from nature, illustrating how interspecies dynamics often reflect human societal conflicts. The use of allegorical references serves to underscore the paradox of human advancement juxtaposed with lingering primal tendencies, compelling us to reflect on the essence of our humanity. In conclusion, the episode encapsulates a rich tapestry of thoughts that encourage listeners to contemplate what it truly means to rise above one's animal nature. It raises critical questions about self-awareness, societal evolution, and the intrinsic connections that bind us to both our animalistic roots and our aspirations for a more enlightened existence. The speakers invite the audience to engage in this profound exploration of identity and consciousness, urging a reevaluation of what it means to live as a sentient being in an increasingly complex world.
Takeaways:
The discourse on whether humanity can transcend its inherent animalistic traits is a profound inquiry.
Rising above one's primal instincts may facilitate a greater understanding of societal issues such as racism and violence.
The notion that animals are not burdened by human-like prejudices raises questions about our social constructs.
Engaging with the concept of 'rare sense' prompts a reevaluation of our perceptions of intelligence and common sense.
The podcast examines the dichotomy between human behavior and animal instincts, exploring potential lessons from nature.
Ultimately, the dialogue encourages reflection on what it means to evolve beyond our base nature.
Now, Rafiki, if it is true that the sphinx, meaning is, can.
Speaker A:
Can a human rise above his animal nature, how do you think that could be accomplished?
Speaker B:
Interesting thought there, if I may interject.
Speaker A:
Sure.
Speaker B:
Kind of going back to what I said earlier, you know, why?
Speaker B:
To me, that's giving off, like, it's a bad thing to be, like, to rise above.
Speaker B:
You know, that's.
Speaker B:
That's rising above something.
Speaker B:
You know, it's.
Speaker B:
We.
Speaker B:
We tend to, you know, use that term, rise above something like.
Speaker B:
Like.
Speaker B:
Like it's a struggle or something.
Speaker B:
Like it's not good to be there.
Speaker B:
That's where you should not be.
Speaker A:
Is this the same mental reset that says common sense is not so common anymore?
Speaker A:
They need to call it rare sense?
Speaker A:
Is this that same dude?
Speaker B:
Yeah, that's him.
Speaker A:
Well, how could you have that stance and then say this thing?
Speaker A:
Because in all actuality, wouldn't.
Speaker A:
Wouldn't rare sense be, hey, you rose above these thinkers.
Speaker B:
That doesn't mean I'm better than them, though.
Speaker A:
Who said.
Speaker A:
Who said.
Speaker B:
Who said rising above something.
Speaker B:
Rising above something.
Speaker B:
1010s.
Speaker B:
It can leave the doorway open to have individuals thinking, oh, if I get above this or get above that, I'm better than X, Y or Z or them.
Speaker A:
But here's a question then, mental.
Speaker A:
What happens when you.
Speaker A:
When you rise.
Speaker A:
When you rise above something?
Speaker A:
What happens when you rise in the air?
Speaker B:
You're no longer walking.
Speaker A:
No.
Speaker A:
What happens when you rise above in the air?
Speaker A:
So let me look down at the terrain.
Speaker A:
I don't know.
Speaker A:
Tell me, Paul, you get a clearer picture of.
Speaker A:
Of where you at, wouldn't you say?
Speaker C:
Yeah.
Speaker C:
So let me chime in here real quick.
Speaker A:
Go ahead.
Speaker C:
So I do believe that we have to rise above and evolve over our animal characteristics.
Speaker C:
And here's the reason why I say that.
Speaker C:
If we can learn how to rise above that.
Speaker C:
Now, I'm gonna take this in a direction that a lot of people do this.
Speaker C:
Like, where's this guy coming from?
Speaker C:
But let me put it this way.
Speaker C:
If we can rise above that animalistic characteristics, we wouldn't have the shootings that we have.
Speaker C:
We wouldn't have the racism that we have.
Speaker C:
We wouldn't have all that.
Speaker B:
Animals aren't racist.
Speaker C:
No, no, no, no, no.
Speaker C:
That's.
Speaker C:
That's the reason why.
Speaker C:
That's.
Speaker C:
That ties into that the animals are more connected to the omniverse than we are.
Speaker A:
Well, hold up.
Speaker A:
If animals ain't racist, why they only stay with their own kind.
Speaker B:
Do animals look at themselves as racist?
Speaker B:
As, as.
Speaker B:
As racist?
Speaker A:
I'm just saying, I'M just saying.
Speaker A:
I'm just saying, if you.
Speaker A:
But if you.
Speaker A:
If you look at.
Speaker A:
If you look at.
Speaker B:
They're different.
Speaker B:
They're different species,
Speaker A:
but they.
Speaker A:
I get what you saying.
Speaker A:
They different species, but in the end.
Speaker A:
But in the end, what are they doing staying with their group?
Speaker B:
Okay, so.
Speaker B:
So the only reason that now there's a races, he says one human species, right?
Speaker B:
Instead of working together like all the bears or all the.
Speaker B:
The animals that, that, that travel in herds and staying with.
Speaker C:
They grew.
Speaker C:
That's.
Speaker B:
That's.
Speaker B:
That's human thinking type shit.
Speaker B:
No, no, no.
Speaker A:
Watch this, watch this.
Speaker B:
Come on.
Speaker A:
This mental.
Speaker A:
What happens when one lion pride comes into another lion pride territory?
Speaker C:
There's your bra.
Speaker A:
Oh, don't that sound like some Crips and Bloods type stuff?
Speaker A:
Hey, man, you came into my neighborhood.
Speaker C:
You're in my territory.
Speaker C:
Get up out of here.
Speaker A:
Yeah, and they came in the territory, and instead of using guns, doing drive bys, instead of doing drive bys using guns, killing people, they got it in with teeth and claws, right?
Speaker A:
What happens when hyenas come around the lion pride?
Speaker A:
What happens when hyenas catch a lion by himself?
Speaker C:
They ganging up on it.
Speaker A:
Oh, that don't sound like some gang.
Speaker A:
Hey, bro, what you.
Speaker A:
You in the wrong neighborhood, dog.
Speaker B:
Yeah, I told you I was gonna
Speaker C:
throw it for a loop, everybody.
Speaker A:
I mean, I mean, even though we watch TV and I could see, you know, we watch Winnie the Pooh and we see this bear hanging out with this donkey and all that stuff, we all know Winnie the Pool in real life with A8EO.
Speaker A:
And when ate Eeyore and took his ass to the cave and hibernated with a full belly.
Speaker A:
So in all actuality, getting back to the question, what do you think makes man rise above his animal nature?
Speaker A:
Oh, oh, I forgot before here.
Speaker A:
Okay, we got an example.
Speaker A:
How do you.
Speaker A:
Tarzan.
Speaker A:
Tarzan was brought up by the apes.
Speaker A:
So here's the question.
Speaker A:
Would Tarzan as a human be more connected to the Omniverse since he was brought up by the apes?
Speaker C:
Very possible.
Speaker B:
I think so.
Speaker B:
I think he will be.
Speaker B:
I think he would be.
Speaker C:
Very possible.
Speaker A:
I got a question for you.
Speaker A:
How about.
Speaker A:
Let's reverse this.
Speaker A:
How about someone who goes in an animal who comes in and live with a human, and that human really, you know, watches and observes that animal?
Speaker A:
Could that animal teach that human how to be more connected?
