Artwork for podcast Resolve Riffs Investment Podcast
In Gold We Trust 2025 - The Big Long
Episode 2316th June 2025 • Resolve Riffs Investment Podcast • ReSolve Asset Management
00:00:00 00:59:25

Share Episode

Shownotes

ReSolve Riffs returns with a deep dive into the world of alternative assets, featuring Mike Philbrick—CEO of ReSolve Asset Management and co-founder of Return Stacked® ETFs, and Rodrigo Gordillo, President of ReSolve Asset Management and co-founder of Return Stacked® ETFs, both of whom are recognized voices in asset management and diversification. In this engaging episode, Mike and Rodrigo explore a broad range of topics, including gold’s structural fundamentals, bitcoin’s emerging role, portfolio diversification techniques, behavioral biases, and the macro trends shaping global investment strategies.

Topics Discussed

  • Structural fundamentals and the historical role of gold as a monetary asset
  • Institutional shifts and the public adoption phase in gold investing
  • Comparative analysis of gold versus bitcoin in today’s market
  • Portfolio diversification through equal risk contribution and return stacking
  • Behavioral influences and challenges in market timing and allocation
  • The impact of central banks, emerging markets, and global macro trends on gold demand
  • Leveraged products, futures, and the risks associated with volatility drag
  • Strategic portfolio construction using non-correlated assets for enhanced returns

Transcripts

Mike Philbrick:

So build up your intuition and your tolerance.

2

:

How, because it's gonna be,

some days you're gonna look at

3

:

it and go, this thing's stupid.

4

:

And then other days you're gonna be

like, oh my gosh, wow, look at that.

5

:

And you're gonna get a sense for that.

6

:

And then it allows you to build and

this is both at the institutional

7

:

level and the retail level.

8

:

This is across all things.

9

:

When you don't have an intuition

for an asset class, 'cause

10

:

you haven't dealt with it.

11

:

I would assume, most people are,

of the age that a lot of times

12

:

they don't have a lot of experience

with gold in the markets today.

13

:

So they're gonna have to

build up that intuition.

14

:

So start small, like, but start.

15

:

And, look at how it interacts

with your portfolio.

16

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: All right.

17

:

welcome everybody to this.

18

:

this gonna be a fun episode, about gold,

bitcoin, precious metals, all the fun

19

:

stuff that came out of this unique report.

20

:

But before I get into it, for those who,

are new to new listeners here, I got Mike

21

:

Philbrick, CEO of Resolve Asset Management

and co-founder of Return Stacked, ETFs.

22

:

Myself, I'm president of Resolve

Asset Management and co-founder

23

:

of Return Stacked ETFs.

24

:

And, today we have a special one for us,

something we've talked about a lot in the

25

:

past, Mike, since the day we met, we've

en talking about gold back in:

26

:

gold is, very near and dear to my heart,

given the lat Latin American angle and,

27

:

you know, US immigrating to Canada because

of, hyperinflation:

28

:

Man, do we wish we had

owned some gold back then?

29

:

so tell us a little bit about the

report that we're gonna cover.

30

:

'cause it was the first time I've read

it and, you know, you have all these

31

:

beliefs and, and it's always been part

of my portfolio and client's portfolios,

32

:

but seeing the numbers that they put out

and everything that they, that they talk

33

:

about was actually quite awe inspiring,

especially given what's happened recently.

34

:

So why don't you tell us a little

bit about the report, the authors and

35

:

Mike Philbrick: Yeah.

36

:

Again, it's in gold we trust

and, the report is done annually.

37

:

It's in its 19th year.

38

:

It's published by Increment Ag, which

is a Lichtenstein based asset manager.

39

:

started in 2007.

40

:

It's in four languages, and it really has

become the global industry Bible, on gold

41

:

and hard asset themes, across the world.

42

:

And probably because it's,

it's such an in-depth report.

43

:

So there's a 400 page report.

44

:

there's a sum rate report of 40 pages.

45

:

40 pages, and then there's

a video summary as well.

46

:

All of which, you know, depending

on where you are and, and how you

47

:

wanna, uh, how much you wanna dig

into it and how much time you wanna

48

:

devote to it will give you, some ideas

on, on how they think about gold.

49

:

And I think what's interesting is the

track record that they have from just

50

:

going back and looking through, if we,

if we look at:

51

:

we Trust report, that's when I started

really paying attention to the report

52

:

just because it was such a good, summary

of what was going on in the world.

53

:

And they were calling for a $4,800 gold.

54

:

you know, they talk about how a a bull

market or a market, evolves and, and

55

:

you, you and I know this, we've been

around to know that generally you

56

:

get a, an accumulation phase where

there's some buying, but it, it's

57

:

kind of ridiculed by peers, right?

58

:

It's, it's frowned upon.

59

:

And I would say really that's been

the case up until the last year.

60

:

you know, even, even central banks were

selling up until the last couple years.

61

:

Institutions have fairly sta

small allocations, but I think

62

:

we've transitioned into the, the

public participation phase in the

63

:

last year where you're starting

to see some people pay attention.

64

:

And I, I evidenced that from some of

the ETF flows we're seeing in North

65

:

America finally coming into the asset.

66

:

Whereas I remember us talking

about it last year where gold was

67

:

on quite a, quite a run and having

reasonably good performance and

68

:

AUM in the large ETFs and, uh,

69

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, it was going down

70

:

Mike Philbrick: was going down.

71

:

Right?

72

:

It, it, it's insane.

73

:

That, that was part of that stealth,

stealth market where you, you get

74

:

that sort of interesting buying.

75

:

that's sort of, there's

a transition happening.

76

:

There's people that are sick

of holding it, and there's

77

:

the new people that are in.

78

:

and so that was interesting.

79

:

And last year's theme was the new,

gold Playbook, which was the idea that,

80

:

you know, emerging markets are gonna

start to demand this, they're gonna

81

:

demand alternatives to the US dollar.

82

:

And, you know, we saw that over

the last year, we saw countries

83

:

like Poland becoming a major buyer.

84

:

2023 was a thousand tons, I

think, of gold bought by central

85

:

banks, which was the highest ever.

86

:

and gold, ETF outflows reversed in

sort of that second half of the year.

87

:

So we're starting to see, the public and,

you know, the, the, the public writ large,

88

:

both institutional and retail catch on.

89

:

So this year's report, is called The Big

Long, which is a, an homage to the Big

90

:

Short, obviously refers to the same sort

of, the Big Long is like well be long

91

:

Gold because there's a loss of, loss of

trust in fiat currencies and institutions

92

:

and global monetary systems, right?

93

:

That, you know, long-term assets like,

gold and Bitcoin are, somewhat of a

94

:

contrarian bet, but we're probably now

in the, in the fifth inning, if you will,

95

:

in the middle, in the middle innings,

and, you know, institutional allocators,

96

:

family offices, pensions and um, retail

investors remain heavily underweight.

97

:

And so, by the way, In Gold We Trust

report, if you put that, just Google that

98

:

you can get this report, from, Incrementum

and it's free and there's no obligation.

99

:

They don't take your email

or anything like that.

100

:

So it's, uh, quite a, quite a good report.

101

:

Got lots of great stuff that we're

gonna dig into and, uh, encourage

102

:

people to take a look at it.

103

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: so let's, um.

104

:

Let's start with just, let's

start from the beginning.

105

:

Okay.

106

:

Because I, this is some, something

that I get asked a lot and it's, I

107

:

think it's an important starting point

because as investment professionals,

108

:

we are often asked to think about

investments from the cashflow perspective.

109

:

What are, what are you investing

in, what are the cash flows,

110

:

what are the dividends?

111

:

What's the yield that you're

gonna achieve from these?

112

:

And that's ultimately what you

end up getting paid for, for

113

:

taking the risk and whatnot.

114

:

Yet, gold is not any of those things.

115

:

You know, you, gold is just this thing

that, that just doesn't seem to go away.

116

:

For thousands and thousands of

years, we have used it as a society.

117

:

it shouldn't have a positive

real rate of return.

118

:

And yet is ex exhibited pretty

robust, real rates of return,

119

:

especially in the last 40 years.

120

:

why is gold a thing that

we should care about?

121

:

Like, like how, how did we get here?

122

:

I.

123

:

Mike Philbrick: It's a, it's a

very interesting question and, and

124

:

one that's, that's hotly debated.

125

:

To some degree I look at it and say,

well, does the Mona Lisa create cash flow?

126

:

Does it have value?

127

:

So if you look at it from the perspective

of the Australian, Australian Austrian

128

:

School of Economics, that, that the

idea of cash flows is something that's

129

:

looked at a little bit differently.

130

:

So I guess I'm not, I'm not actually

sure, I'm not here to make that

131

:

argument, from the standpoint of, Hey,

it doesn't have cash flows, or it does.

132

:

What we do see though, is it's a monetary

asset and it's a monetary asset that

133

:

seems to be in demand by central banks,

which are running our monetary system.

134

:

It is an asset that over the last

5,000 years has represented an

135

:

interest, an asset that does not

allow an interest of somebody else.

136

:

It's not rehypothicated.

137

:

If you own it, you hold it in

your own hands, it's yours, and

138

:

it has some value of transaction.

139

:

And that transactional value is

happening between governments, between

140

:

people, been around for a long time.

141

:

so I, I guess I'm just not gonna

fight it and die on the rock that

142

:

says, well, it doesn't have cashflow.

143

:

There's a lot of things that we

buy in this world that don't have

144

:

cashflow that we perceive to have

value in some way, shape or form.

145

:

Yeah.

146

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

147

:

And it seems, look, it's, there's

a, I think I remember having Michael

148

:

Green on the podcast and having him

lay out the case originally why gold.

149

:

'cause we've had many stores

of value in the past, right?

150

:

We've had salt and, and you know,

silver and different types of metals.

151

:

But gold ended up being one

that was plentiful across the

152

:

whole crust of the planet.

153

:

So it seemed to pop up everywhere.

154

:

So if you were anywhere in the world,

you somehow mined this beautiful metal.

155

:

And then when trade began, that was the

one common area that people could kind of

156

:

see that was an ex, a medium of exchange.

157

:

And then when you have every culture

have gold, part of their ethos, right?

158

:

We can just go back to the

history of Latin America, India.

159

:

it, I think has just, it became

ingrained as a store of value.

160

:

And, and we have now created a

whole financial system around it.

161

:

Central banks own it.

162

:

And every single time in our, in

what we studied gold, it seems

163

:

to be a very important hedge for

global macro, volatility, right?

164

:

That like, that's number one.

165

:

And then currency debasement.

166

:

Those are the two elements that you can

kind of count on when, when governments

167

:

screw up from a fiscal perspective

or if when there's war or chaos.

168

:

Globally, we have seen a run to gold.

169

:

normally it's a run to the US dollar.

170

:

The reserve currency used to be

the, uh, used to be the, uh, UK

171

:

currency and before that many

other nations that, that existed.

172

:

But.

173

:

That, that took, that,

reserve currency dominance.

174

:

But when it became, when the

government itself started losing

175

:

control of their expenditures, gold

was always a place that seems to,

176

:

you know, be there for investors.

177

:

So from, from my perspective, it's

just something that we have observed

178

:

that does well, when I look at

portfolio construction, I want things

179

:

that make money over time, but act

differently and create some sort

180

:

of hedge for different scenarios

that bonds and equities can't do.

181

:

and we are, you know, it, it, it

was stealthily making money for a

182

:

couple decades and now people are

starting to pay attention, which

183

:

is interesting, this accumulation

phase that you were talking about.

184

:

Right.

185

:

now let's, let's get into,

why the recent run up in gold?

186

:

You talked a little bit about it, right?

187

:

But there, there's, there's a

structural reason and then there's,

188

:

there's some fundamental reasons.

189

:

I just talked about some fundamental

reasons, which is global macro volatility.

190

:

That's certainly been an important

thing that we've seen in the

191

:

last couple of years, right?

192

:

With the Ukraine war and what

we're seeing now with Donald Trump.

193

:

But then there's also the structural

area that you were, you were

194

:

about, that you also address.

195

:

And the structural area is how

much, like it's the, almost

196

:

like the stock to flow idea,

197

:

Mike Philbrick: Mm-hmm.

198

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: right?

199

:

Like there's only a set amount of gold.

200

:

There's one and a half percent of

gold being mine year over year.

201

:

Mike Philbrick: Yep.

202

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: and then, you

know, there's another stat that I saw

203

:

Mike Philbrick: And it costs

money to mine that gold.

204

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: and it costs

a lot of money to mine the gold

205

:

and the price, that, the the, it,

it's a 10 year cycle to mine it.

206

:

And the incentives to mine it were

the prices of 10 years ago when

207

:

they're like, okay, what's the price?

208

:

Now we'll start the process

of opening up this mine.

209

:

And, from a structural perspective,

it's just been interesting to see.

210

:

You know, I didn't even

know this from the report.

211

:

I'll, I'll push it up here.

212

:

what percentage of, let me ask the

audience here, what percentage of people's

213

:

portfolios, of investors' portfolios

do you think that gold represents?

214

:

If, if anybody wants to guess?

215

:

Anybody have an idea?

216

:

We got a three lance

lance nut and it says 3%.

217

:

Then we got a one and a five.

218

:

All right, I'm gonna share my screen here.

219

:

yeah, it's actually around 1%

according to this gold report, right?

220

:

So you're looking at, out of the

alternative sleeves that you got 42%

221

:

of the whole alternative asset class,

private equity, private real estate.

222

:

The infrastructure, art and commodities.

223

:

Gold is just 1%.

224

:

Right.

225

:

And there's a lot of room to run here,

if given that that, that we have had

226

:

zero adoption for all this time and

people are waking up to, I mean, it

227

:

really is the only class, asset class

that has done really well this year.

228

:

Right

229

:

Mike Philbrick: Yeah.

230

:

And I, I think, you know, there was, I,

I, I, there was that whole, process where

231

:

there was gold trading at a different

price in London versus Shin Zhang, China.

232

:

And you saw gold moving from the east to

the west or I guess from the west to the

233

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: on the, yeah.

234

:

Mike Philbrick: from the

west to the east rather.

235

:

And so, that's, that was where

we had that stealth buying.

236

:

Right.

237

:

And now you're seeing it more proliferate

into, and, and we didn't see it in

238

:

AUM on ETFs like GLD for example.

239

:

but now you've seen that.

240

:

And I was talking to a reporter, with the

Globe & Mail in Canada and we had done

241

:

a review last year on this very topic.

242

:

And it was just interesting to go

over it again and see this Yeah.

243

:

This change in, in regime from the

standpoint of central bank buying,

244

:

of, of the, the assets because

245

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: the one, this is

the one that you talked about, right?

246

:

This is the, the cumulative

gold ETF holdings

247

:

Mike Philbrick: Right.

248

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: going flat.

249

:

And then all of a sudden, you know,

you have this demand, like the price

250

:

of gold going up, and only now it's

starting to pull retail demand for it.

251

:

Mike Philbrick: yeah.

252

:

So, so the point is it's

not too late, right?

253

:

So if you only have a 1% allocation or

you have a zero allocation, then, you

254

:

know, this is something to consider.

255

:

And, you know, at, at the moment as we

sit and chat about this on May 23rd,

256

:

you know, we've got a little bit of

digestion going on in the gold market.

257

:

So it sets up the opportunity to

start to think about how you might

258

:

add assets, hard assets, like, uh,

Bitcoin and gold and, and, and how

259

:

they might compliment the portfolio.

260

:

but yeah, it's, it's astonishing

how low the exposure across, the

261

:

asset allocators it has become.

262

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Here's why.

263

:

It's

264

:

Mike Philbrick: in spite

of the performance, in

265

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

266

:

Here's why it's astonishing, right?

267

:

Because this, this is a chart that got me.

268

:

Where I'm like, if I would've shown

anybody, this is just, for those

269

:

listeners where I'm going, I'm looking

at the performance of gold against

270

:

different currencies from 2000 to

today, and it's just a sea of green.

271

:

It's not like other non-correlated

asset classes that tend to have, you

272

:

know, 50% of the, like commodities.

273

:

80% of the time they're losing money.

274

:

20% of the time when there's inflation,

they're making a lot of money.

275

:

Like gold has had a phenomenal

run, fairly consistent.

276

:

Volatility sim, similar to

equities, 15% annualized volatility.

277

:

It's actually lower than equities.

278

:

And yet, you know, if I'd shown you

blind these returns, you would've

279

:

jumped at this opportunity until

the moment I say it's a, it's gold.

280

:

Mike Philbrick: Mm-hmm.

281

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: There's just this

stigma, about gold in spite of the fact

282

:

that we had ETFs, central banks buy it.

283

:

Everybody knows about it.

284

:

There's just, there's none

of it in people's portfolios.

285

:

So that

286

:

Mike Philbrick: Well, well we're,

the interesting thing is it is

287

:

gonna be neat to watch the narrative

for investors change, right?

288

:

Because now we're in the public, public

phase of it actually creeping out into

289

:

institutions, creeping out into retail.

290

:

And then the question is, of

course, how do you, how do you

291

:

put it into your portfolio?

292

:

How are you gonna build

it into your portfolio?

293

:

What are the steps you

might take to do so?

294

:

And, um, what other assets might you

use that have similar characteristics?

295

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Well, it's

terrifying right now, let's be honest.

296

:

Right?

297

:

You got two, you got a,

a 25% return last year.

298

:

Another 20 plus percent return this year.

299

:

You know, it it, this is, this

is why I like the report because

300

:

it just, you always want some

framing, okay, where are we?

301

:

Is it over?

302

:

Is it now like a 50% bear

market for the next 10 years?

303

:

and so, you know, some of the key elements

about the report was how even like the

304

:

US 30 year yield is higher than, you

know, we've seen it in a long time.

305

:

And then the, and then Germany, the last

holdout of prudence when it came to fiscal

306

:

spend just finally threw in the towel.

307

:

And you've seen German bundts

yields just pop through the roof.

308

:

And, and so

309

:

Mike Philbrick: And, and what do

we know or what have we perceived

310

:

about the relationship between

real returns and the price of gold?

311

:

Previously, higher real returns

meant lower gold prices, right?

312

:

Because the, you could get a real

return, but in the face of rising

313

:

yields, you have gold strength.

314

:

That, to me, signifies

a kind of regime shift.

315

:

That this asset, and they refer to

it a little bit here and there, and

316

:

the report is like, are you playing

offense with this asset or are you

317

:

playing defense with this asset?

318

:

And previously you were

playing defense, right?

319

:

This is a defensive asset that

would actually score a few goals

320

:

for you, but now it looks like it's

turning into an actual asset that

321

:

can create returns for the portfolio.

322

:

It's shifting and there's a regime

shift afoot as we change into

323

:

the public, participation part.

324

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: So let me show

you a chart that I was updating

325

:

today that we used to use a lot.

326

:

You and me, Mike.

327

:

I'm actually, I'm actually gonna

block off some of it first 'cause

328

:

I, I'll show you what I used to do.

329

:

'cause I was, I was quite, again, I

know this, it's just when you see it.

330

:

Right.

331

:

It becomes a little bit surprising,

but I used to always, when I talk

332

:

to investors, look, you should

be as diversified as you can.

333

:

You're currently in equities and

bonds, you should probably be invested

334

:

in, um, as, as many non-correlated

things that are fairly liquid.

335

:

Right.

336

:

And so I would show I would show

a chart that showed equities,

337

:

gold, commodities, and currencies.

338

:

And, let me see if I can bring it up.

339

:

I'm gonna bring up an old chart here,

but, it was, they all ended up at

340

:

the same spot from 1990 to today.

341

:

Okay.

342

:

Let me,

343

:

yeah, there we go.

344

:

So we have, this is from 1990 to 20.

345

:

It wa 20 21, 20 23.

346

:

You can see how, you know, they all

kind of ended up at the same spot.

347

:

That dark blue line is an equal

risk portfolio of all of them.

348

:

But, since then, the, the treasury

component has just plummeted.

349

:

Right?

350

:

it has been like, this is,

this is the next chart here.

351

:

Like that blue line has just, this is a 30

year treasury, just absolutely plummeted

352

:

and flatlined from 2023 to 2025, and

the winner ends up in the, in the most

353

:

recent period to be almost to be gold.

354

:

Right?

355

:

Mike Philbrick: Right.

356

:

Which follows a period 2011 when Gold

peaked in its last run right to, what

357

:

was it last year at, at probably around

this time that was a, a 14 year, 13 year

358

:

sideways market in gold and maybe we're

on a 13 year sideways market in bonds.

359

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

360

:

I mean, it, it has happened before, right?

361

:

And few people know this, but how,

what was the largest drawdown for,

362

:

in real terms, for treasuries?

363

:

This is a, my favorite, Meb Faber quote,

is like, like 65% drawdown in real terms,

364

:

Mike Philbrick: Mm-hmm.

365

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: right?

366

:

Absolutely bonkers.

367

:

And, and what did well at the time,

you know, this is way back in, in the

368

:

1900s, but at the time you could have

invested in gold minoring mining stocks.

369

:

I actually did it in analysis.

370

:

'cause gold was pegged.

371

:

But if you invested in gold miners,

it did, they did fairly well.

372

:

which is something that the report

also talks about, and an interesting

373

:

kind of transition away from gold.

374

:

Like what did you, what did you

garner from the, the gold miners part?

375

:

Mike Philbrick: Well, it kind of,

that old Don Cox saying right?

376

:

When those who know it best, like it

least you got a buying opportunity.

377

:

And I mean, if there's something that

hasn't disappointed more often over

378

:

the last few years as Gold has actually

appreciated, and to see whether you're

379

:

looking at, you know, broad-based ETFs,

GDX, GDXJ, the juniors in in gold, they

380

:

really have not felt that participation.

381

:

You know, there's this old, you know, if,

if you get this gearing from, gold stocks

382

:

that, you, you sort of get like a three

to one leverage, when you buy gold stocks

383

:

versus, you know, just owning the gold.

384

:

And we haven't seen that.

385

:

We've seen sort of one-to-one

participation with a lot more

386

:

volatility over the last year, call it.

387

:

And if you go a little bit further

back and say, well, let's go back,

388

:

three years, what you see is, you

know, the large cap gold stocks

389

:

are up 65% and Gold's up 80, right?

390

:

So the stock side of it has

absolutely underperformed,

391

:

the the physical metal side.

392

:

But there's a lot in there when those

gold companies are producing, they sell

393

:

a lot of the production forward in order

to make sure they can make ends meet.

394

:

And when the price is kind of

languishing from:

395

:

up selling a lot of your production

forward just to kind of get by.

396

:

And then you start to getting,

get into a period where, like you

397

:

said, Rod, it's that 10 year cycle.

398

:

You gotta build a mine in

order to build the mine.

399

:

You wanna take some of that,

financing risk off the table.

400

:

So as you're building and producing,

you're selling forward your production in

401

:

order to make sure you've got that locked

in so you can run your, run your business.

402

:

So very interesting.

403

:

And it seems to me that, I don't

know, maybe that set, that set that

404

:

area is due for some catch up, but

that's always a bit funny too, right?

405

:

And you and I know that there's

the beta in gold stocks and then

406

:

there's the gold in gold stocks.

407

:

And when you mix the two, you know,

again, I think Increment did a great job

408

:

on here's an interesting portfolio of

how you might incorporate commodities

409

:

and gold and silver and thinking like

silver and gold stocks, and silver

410

:

stocks are more of these kind of

more offensive, like higher geared,

411

:

opportunities, which they absolutely are.

412

:

Which means they have

more downside risk too.

413

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Assuming you can't

lever up the thing, you wanna lever up

414

:

the most, like this is the basis, the

basis risk that you, that you take.

415

:

Like do you believe in gold

and what it's gonna do?

416

:

Well, yes, you could trade all

these other things because you

417

:

get more volatility outta them.

418

:

But for guys like you and me that love

futures contracts and, and want to

419

:

get, in order to get a better portfolio

construction, we can gear it up.

420

:

I'd rather gear up that

main, that main asset, right?

421

:

So

422

:

Mike Philbrick: Yeah, the, the,

the main factor, right, if you

423

:

like, like you've got, you've got

operational risk, so you're gonna

424

:

buy a co, a company that mines gold.

425

:

Well, there's operational risk there,

you know, tailing ponds go wrong.

426

:

The shit's not

427

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: how much, how much

of their gold exposure did they hedge?

428

:

Mike Philbrick: Yeah, exactly.

429

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: and so you're

not getting the upside, it's just,

430

:

it's, you're taking on, you're

taking on pro-cyclical risk that is

431

:

correlated to the, the economic cycle.

432

:

So I'd rather just buy the

pure gold, even silver, right?

433

:

Again, I think it's more about

gearing, but silver ends up being

434

:

more of an industrial metal,

435

:

Mike Philbrick: Yes.

436

:

More economic sensitivity, right?

437

:

Yeah.

438

:

So, so you want that

unique orthogonal nature.

439

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: yeah, and I think.

440

:

For, let's, let's kind of transition

a little bit toward Bitcoin, right?

441

:

Because they, this is kind of

what, what's been termed as the

442

:

new gold and the debates have, I've

been part of many debates, people

443

:

saying it's a hundred percent gold.

444

:

No, it's a hundred percent Bitcoin.

445

:

Bitcoin has the same qualities, but

you know, you can transfer it, quickly.

446

:

you can have it in low

quantities if you want to.

447

:

So you can have, you know, partial shares.

448

:

You can travel with it without anybody

having to, having to declare you can

449

:

walk through borders with all this

money in your pocket, in your brain.

450

:

Like all these benefits of the new gold.

451

:

so what are the similarities and

where, where is the risk there

452

:

Mike Philbrick: Oh, it's a,

it's a great, and you and I are

453

:

largely yes and people, right?

454

:

I, I don't think it's

an OR question, right?

455

:

You can incorporate both, quite honestly.

456

:

But as you say, so, so does Bitcoin

have central banks around the

457

:

world buying it in mass amounts?

458

:

Starting but not yet,

459

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Well, that's another

thing they covered in the report that,

460

:

Mike Philbrick: Yeah.

461

:

You're starting

462

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: you have

the crypto of, uh, what's his

463

:

Mike Philbrick: yeah.

464

:

El Salvador and

465

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: David Sachs.

466

:

El Salvador.

467

:

Buying, making it as you know, some.

468

:

Mike Philbrick: Yep.

469

:

So it's happening, right?

470

:

So if we, if we set the table,

so the market cap on gold is,

471

:

call it 15 to 17 trillion.

472

:

The market cap on, Bitcoin is 1.3

473

:

to 1.5

474

:

trillion, so call it 10 x.

475

:

So gold represents 10 x.

476

:

It's been around a lot longer, probably

makes sense that that's the case.

477

:

There's just different features to

these two asset classes and a different,

478

:

sort of track record or, and I mean,

by track record, I mean, historically

479

:

Gold's been around for a very long time.

480

:

Bitcoin is the new kid on the block,

and I think they both offer some very

481

:

interesting and unique characteristics.

482

:

One is that gold, you know, has

a historical volatility of 10%.

483

:

You know, it moves around a

bit, but it's not like gold.

484

:

Yeah.

485

:

Where it's like 80.

486

:

So volatility is just how

much it goes up and down

487

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Well, that's,

that's my framework for it.

488

:

All right.

489

:

I'm not fully, like, I, you know, you

are a, you're a lot more sold on this

490

:

being a wave of the future than I am.

491

:

I gotta be honest.

492

:

But let's, let's just go

through the similarities.

493

:

So it seems to have that same idea

that it's widely distributed around

494

:

the globe, so anybody can get it with

anybody, with a computer, which is

495

:

most of the population now can get it.

496

:

it is a, an asset that every four

years, the, the amount that can

497

:

be mined gets cut in half, right?

498

:

Until there isn't more to mine.

499

:

And so it becomes this asset, a

scarce asset that will go up and

500

:

down depending on whether humans

actually care about it or not.

501

:

Much like gold, right?

502

:

We couldn't have, we couldn't quite

pinpoint anything for gold except for the

503

:

fact that we want it and humanity uses it

and everybody's got broadly distributed.

504

:

some gold.

505

:

So, but, but 5, 6, 7 years ago,

the volatility of Bitcoin was 120,

506

:

Mike Philbrick: yeah,

507

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: is 15, golds

been 15, then it's gone down to a

508

:

hundred, to 80 and most recently going

down to 75% annualized volatility.

509

:

Now, that is a lot, right?

510

:

But this is, this is my framework for it.

511

:

So I like to use it in my portfolio as,

as a currency debasement trade, but I'm

512

:

always willing to have that go to zero.

513

:

I do an equal risk approach, and,

and we can talk about, I, I'll show

514

:

you some slides that I've shown

already in the ReSolve Riffs Podcast

515

:

back in the, the Christmas episode

with Meb, Corey and, and Wes.

516

:

But if I'm, if you're right, the

volatility of Bitcoin will con is it gets

517

:

more and more adoption, the volatility

of Bitcoin will get lower and lower and

518

:

lower, and if you're managing that kind

of currency debasement portfolio and

519

:

equal risk, then that Bitcoin portion

will get higher and higher and higher.

520

:

If I am, like, I'm not saying that I want

to be right about this, but let's say

521

:

that the other side happens and Bitcoin

becomes less and less of an option, that

522

:

there's some issues that gets attacked.

523

:

The volatility of that asset is gonna

go up and up and up back to where

524

:

it was in the beginning until it

goes up so high that from an equal

525

:

risk contribution perspective in my

portfolio, it becomes a non allocation.

526

:

Right?

527

:

So the volatility to me, gives me

all the information I need to require

528

:

an asset that I, I think is very

interesting, very, very interesting.

529

:

But we can manage the risk by not having

a static allocation, hopeful for the best.

530

:

You know what I mean?

531

:

Mike Philbrick: Oh yeah.

532

:

And, and also your initial allocation

or let, so in your context you say,

533

:

well, I want some hard assets in

my portfolio because I, I see a

534

:

lot of what's happening in debt.

535

:

I see debt monetization.

536

:

I see fiscal dominance, and I see some

things that are, are somewhat concerning.

537

:

And I'm getting the confirmation of

strangers through price, both price

538

:

and Bitcoin, and price and gold.

539

:

I, I have confirmation of

strangers in that more people

540

:

are buying and selling it.

541

:

That's why the price is rising.

542

:

So I like all, all of that makes sense.

543

:

And then to say, well then how

much, so if you have some position

544

:

in your portfolio, let's say you've

got 10% is kind of an easy one.

545

:

People say 10% in gold.

546

:

I dunno, I don't know how we got

there, but that might be right.

547

:

Might be not right.

548

:

But if you got 10% in gold, then okay,

what does that mean for a Bitcoin holding?

549

:

Probably something in the neighborhood

of, why wouldn't we do 10% to the both

550

:

assets where you've got 8% in gold

exposure and 2% in Bitcoin exposure,

551

:

thereby equalizing those two exposures.

552

:

So you've got equal risk coming from

them and incorporating that, both the

553

:

old and the new into the portfolio.

554

:

From the standpoint of diversifying

the portfolio, I think at this point

555

:

we can probably suggest that Bitcoin

is a bit more of an offensive player.

556

:

Right?

557

:

So

558

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Well, I mean,

it is, it is in that like in:

559

:

it didn't do what gold did, right?

560

:

Gold went up, uh, in

, in, sorry, in:

561

:

And so, but, but this year it's

acting interestingly, right?

562

:

It's actually doing offsetting gold

and gold has a bad, bad period.

563

:

So it's, let me show you the, um,

564

:

Mike Philbrick: And, and gold and

gold having a trend while Bitcoin

565

:

was kind of languishing around

the highs and having pullbacks.

566

:

So they're very complimentary

to one another as well.

567

:

So again, I, I think it's, it's not an OR.

568

:

And then the next question is, you know,

as, as we are purveyors of the I concept

569

:

of Return Stacked Portfolio Solutions.

570

:

Well then, you know, why, why do

you want to even give up your stocks

571

:

and bonds that, you know, love and

572

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: but before, before we

get into that, let, let me just kind of

573

:

Mike Philbrick: Well that was just a

574

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: address, yeah.

575

:

Let me just address kind of the, the

concept of kind of equalizing risk here.

576

:

And I, and I did this at a time

when everybody was saying, I, I, you

577

:

should either be your Bitcoin or gold.

578

:

And I was just showing people

how unfair that comparison is

579

:

given the volatility, right?

580

:

So this is, I started a reasonable

period where, you know, Bitcoin

581

:

wasn't absolutely insane.

582

:

So 2018, just to show that yes indeed

Bitcoin has done 20% return versus gold

583

:

during that same period had done 10%.

584

:

So this is, this is a little, this

is back in, December of, of last

585

:

Mike Philbrick: Still relevant.

586

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Sharp ratio.

587

:

Sharp ratio around 0.6

588

:

for both of them though, right?

589

:

So what does that mean?

590

:

It means that if I were to scale goal

up to the same level of volatility

591

:

of Bitcoin, which can be done

with a futures contract, right?

592

:

This might seem a little insane,

but it's, it's insane to invest a

593

:

hundred percent of your assets in an

80 vol product in the first place.

594

:

If you're that type of person.

595

:

You can also just easily lever

up a gold futures contract, 5.7

596

:

times, I think, is that

what I ended up doing there?

597

:

to hit the same level of fall as

BTC, and now we're looking at, better

598

:

returns from gold during that period.

599

:

In fact, if I were to like, we

now know that:

600

:

gold's actually killing it.

601

:

Um, so, so the question is,

yeah, maybe gold, right?

602

:

And of course my answer

is, well, not both, right?

603

:

If you were to equal risk this,

again, you're equal risking,

604

:

you're grabbing instead of 5.7%,

605

:

you, you just buy 50% of Bitcoin and,

um, 285% of, of a gold, futures contract

606

:

and equal weight it and rebalance.

607

:

And guess what happens?

608

:

Because the correlations, what's

interesting is that they're both,

609

:

they both seem to be good for currency

debasement stuff, but the, their

610

:

daily correlations is some, it is

on average zero, sometimes negative.

611

:

And as you and I both know from

Shannon's demon and the rebalancing

612

:

premium, that when you have two

negative correlated assets that in

613

:

this case and both making money and

you're able to rebalance from them, you

614

:

create this, this rebalancing premium.

615

:

And so what's interesting is that by

putting this portfolio of equal risk

616

:

together, your volatility goes from 80 to

61, but your returns go through the roof,

617

:

your returns are significantly higher.

618

:

'cause of that rebalancing,

premium sharpe ratio goes up.

619

:

Right.

620

:

So again, this is a portfolio

construction over ethos or, you know,

621

:

a gold religion or a Bitcoin religion.

622

:

It's just be you like 'em

both put 'em in equal risk.

623

:

Now, I am not gonna invest

in an 80 vol anything.

624

:

I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna invest

in this portfolio I'm showing you.

625

:

Right?

626

:

And so, what an average investor could

do is what you just described, right?

627

:

Instead of levering up your gold, lever

everything, lever Bitcoin down to equal

628

:

risk to your, to your gold allocation.

629

:

So we could, you could do that by just

looking at the market cap of gold versus

630

:

Bitcoin, which I think is like bitcoin's,

what 10% of you mentioned it earlier.

631

:

Mike Philbrick: 10 to one.

632

:

Call it.

633

:

10 to one.

634

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: 10.

635

:

So, so 10 to one.

636

:

So that's, you know, nine, nine 90%

in, uh, in gold, 10% in Bitcoin.

637

:

When you do equal risk contribution, it

used to be like 7% when it, when you start

638

:

doing this with Bitcoin in the beginning

and now it's like bumping up to 15,

639

:

to 20 to 20%, and it'll vary depending

on like, volatility is expanding,

640

:

contract correlation, expand contract.

641

:

But I think that that, given that

they're in around the same theme,

642

:

I like that they're non-correlated.

643

:

Even if you like the people talk about

silver and miners, they're too correlated

644

:

to be able to benefit from the non

correlation if you can get the leverage,

645

:

if you want it to from just using this.

646

:

I like the, the fact that it's Bitcoin

and gold being so non-correlated that

647

:

they're creating their own return stream.

648

:

Mike Philbrick: on a

day-to-day basis, right?

649

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

650

:

Mike Philbrick: they really, really are.

651

:

And it, it stems from the fact

there are very different buyers

652

:

that own both of these assets still.

653

:

Bitcoin is going through

the institutionalization.

654

:

I mean, gold has been

institutionalized many, many moons ago.

655

:

And, um, so it's an interesting,

juxtaposition of both the new and the

656

:

old, but both have, you know, finite

supply building new supply is hard.

657

:

Costs money, whether you're, whether

you're mining Bitcoin or you're mining

658

:

gold, whether you're trying to, you know,

get the machines to solve the problem

659

:

or get a, get a a contract approved

to, uh, develop a, a site to mine gold.

660

:

These are, these are hard things

and uh, they cost money to do so.

661

:

but again, I also think there's

a different, a very different

662

:

group of buyers for each of those

if we look right down to it.

663

:

And the individual investor doesn't really

have to think through that in the sense

664

:

that they have access to the products.

665

:

Right.

666

:

You

667

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: In a way

they didn't a few years back.

668

:

Right?

669

:

Mike Philbrick: correct.

670

:

Right.

671

:

You've got, you've got, financialized

Bitcoin products, whether they're

672

:

through ETFs, whether through the

futures markets, all allowing you

673

:

to build in this unique asset class.

674

:

We've had that in gold for some time.

675

:

but again, combining those two together,

bringing both the old and the new

676

:

together and thinking through, not

letting the maniacs run the asylum.

677

:

Right.

678

:

If you, if you say, well, I'm gonna

give you a dollar of gold and a

679

:

dollar of Bitcoin, that's fine too.

680

:

But you know, you're largely gonna

be dominated by the higher volatility

681

:

asset, which is gonna be Bitcoin.

682

:

but if you're thinking through an

allocation from the perspective of,

683

:

well, I've got some gold and I, you

know, I'll sell a little bit of my gold

684

:

and buy a stack of gold and Bitcoin,

well, then you've got your Bitcoin

685

:

stacked on your gold, which you could do.

686

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: You, you

know what's interesting?

687

:

I, I just remembered and pulled this up.

688

:

When we, when we wrote the paper

on, um, the rebalancing premium,

689

:

like something about risk parity.

690

:

In the beginning we did an analysis on

the correlation between just three assets.

691

:

Gold stocks and, treasuries.

692

:

And so you can see the correlation

is very low just within gold.

693

:

And, and what's interesting here to

point out is that if you just do the

694

:

compound returns of the portfolio, like

the, just an arithmetic addition of what

695

:

they would do in a portfolio without

rebalancing, you're looking at a 6.7%

696

:

rate of return.

697

:

The rebalancing between gold stocks and

treasuries, which are not, you know,

698

:

the, the correlation is pretty low.

699

:

You're looking at an extra 1.2%

700

:

per year in that portfolio.

701

:

So that portfolio with daily rebalancing

compounded an 8% rate of return.

702

:

Now, now add a, another hyper

non-correlated asset 'cause it's

703

:

also, you know, low, it still has low

correlation to treasuries and, and stocks.

704

:

You're just adding more

rebalancing premium, which I love.

705

:

Mike Philbrick: And that, that's a, that's

a really interesting time period too.

706

:

June 82 to 2020.

707

:

So you've got gold peaking at that point.

708

:

You've got rates peaking, so

you get a great bond bull run,

709

:

but you get a pretty, pretty vi

vigorous, gold bear market, right?

710

:

So it, it's still, even though those

were more persistent trends throughout

711

:

that period, that 38 year period, you

still came up with wonderful rebalancing

712

:

opportunities between the asset classes.

713

:

And that's, that's such a wonderful thing.

714

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: And here's

why this is important, right?

715

:

Here's why it's important.

716

:

This goes back to, um, Antiel and

when he, when we brought him in to,

717

:

to speak about commodities, right?

718

:

This, this view that commodities

is, is a, has a zero, uh, real

719

:

rate of return on their own.

720

:

But when you create a commodity

portfolio and you weigh them

721

:

appropriately, and you, you capture

that rebalancing treatment, guess what?

722

:

Now you have a real return because you've,

you've basically extracted a yield from

723

:

non-correlated asset classes, right?

724

:

So in a, in a way, like, yes.

725

:

We just, we started the

conversation by saying, what type

726

:

of yield does gold provide us?

727

:

What type of and yield

does Bitcoin provide us?

728

:

And they don't.

729

:

But if you structure your portfolio the

right way, if you include 'em in your

730

:

portfolio just a little bit, you're

already gonna be capturing an excess

731

:

yield that is, you know, this idea of the,

that one plus one equals three, right?

732

:

Like this is the, the, whole is

greater than sum of its parts.

733

:

Mike Philbrick: And, and the

systematic nature of that, right?

734

:

You don't, you don't have to be super

smart, to just do your rebalancing.

735

:

I would say the, the challenge, I guess on

the behavioral side is it's uncomfortable

736

:

to rebalance sometimes because you're

selling what's working and, uh, and

737

:

buying what's not working a little bit.

738

:

but that does work over time.

739

:

and if you're, if you're gonna sin a

little as I think Rob Barnett says, if

740

:

you're gonna sin a little, go for it.

741

:

You know, let

742

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Let's talk

about setting, staying a bit more.

743

:

so let's go into other ways of

doing portfolio construction.

744

:

I think ultimately what we discovered

in trying to get people to add

745

:

diversifiers to their portfolio

is that they don't want it.

746

:

It's too different, it's too hard.

747

:

Even as I showed that incredible run

that Gold's had, since:

748

:

still resident to own something that

different when that they can't understand.

749

:

Right.

750

:

So I think the advent of, of Return

Stacking and all the things, all the

751

:

different, products that are coming

out that allow to stack things on top.

752

:

Give people an out.

753

:

Right?

754

:

You gotta, you, you now have an

option to possibly not have to sell

755

:

your favorite toys, sell your core

stocks and bonds in order to make

756

:

room for these weird diversifiers.

757

:

you can now actually just get,

keep your 60 40 or 80 20 and

758

:

just add the diversifiers on top.

759

:

Yes, in this case, you know, prop

volatility is likely to increase

760

:

a little bit, but you don't have

to go a hundred percent right.

761

:

You add a 10%, 20% allocation

depending on how, what your view

762

:

is on, currency debasement and

continued global macro spheres.

763

:

It's a great way to, you

know, yes and the problem.

764

:

Mike Philbrick: I totally agree, and

I kind of think that if we are honest

765

:

with ourselves, the math makes sense.

766

:

The returns are better in gold.

767

:

They were last year,

yet no one gave a Why?

768

:

Well, there's a huge

behavioral aspect to this.

769

:

Are my friends doing it?

770

:

My friends aren't doing it, and I'm

not feeling the pressure of that, of

771

:

those peers and that the, what do they

call them, sort of, best practices.

772

:

Then it's okay that, you know, we didn't

hear it from anybody that, oh my god,

773

:

gold did X and you're your diversified

funded Y and that was less than X.

774

:

No one ever says that.

775

:

Right now the darling in

the room is the S&P 500.

776

:

you know, we've been around

for a couple market cycles,

777

:

so it hasn't always been that.

778

:

Brick's been '08 and then the US back

in:

779

:

82 and it was gold and gold stocks.

780

:

So there's this huge behavioral

tax that people pay waiting for

781

:

that, that public adoption, right?

782

:

They're not in, when there's a stealth

opportunity, when you could be in,

783

:

if you were just simply rebalancing

or stacking or doing something

784

:

that allows you to participate in

the markets that your friends are

785

:

participating in so that your tracking

error's lower, so that your behavioral

786

:

biases don't undermine your success.

787

:

You know, versus taking the big

plunge we just talked about, you

788

:

know, the numbers from 1982 for

crying out loud, like it makes sense

789

:

to have some gold in your portfolio.

790

:

Yet the allocation by pension funds,

family offices, large, sophisticated

791

:

asset allocators is a sub 1%,

792

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

793

:

Mike Philbrick: right?

794

:

We're we, we all are humans.

795

:

Lemmings,

796

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: I mean, I must admit

the, the coal community is a little weird.

797

:

You know what I mean?

798

:

Like, it's those

799

:

Mike Philbrick: But I'm not talking.

800

:

This is the funny thing,

801

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: I'm not gonna.

802

:

Mike Philbrick: we get, we get

painted as the gold community.

803

:

I'm, I'm a centrist here.

804

:

I'm not a gold guy.

805

:

I'm a centrist.

806

:

I'm like, you should have some, 'cause

it's different because it adds value.

807

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: That's it.

808

:

Like from a, like, I, I can get behind it

from a portfolio construction perspective.

809

:

I just, this, you and I have met a

bunch of advisors that are, have been

810

:

all in on gold and good for them.

811

:

They, but they've been all in on gold.

812

:

Like a hundred percent of

813

:

Mike Philbrick: a long time.

814

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: do is

around precious metals.

815

:

I mean, we grew up with Eric Sprott.

816

:

Mike Philbrick: Oh yeah.

817

:

We're, uh, being Canadians,

818

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, right.

819

:

Like that's all that

820

:

Mike Philbrick: and, and you're,

you're Peruvian from, from the, the,

821

:

you know, so, so natural resources

in gold are, are well ingrained.

822

:

They're probably more acceptable

to us as investments than, you

823

:

know, a lot of people in the US.

824

:

And, and we do see that, like,

we see that in the numbers.

825

:

And I guess that this is, we're in that

public stage where you're, it's gonna

826

:

start to be okay as an allocator and

advisor to start incorporating gold.

827

:

Get this, it's gonna start to be okay.

828

:

You're gonna be able to actually do

that and not suffer the slings and

829

:

arrows of being considered a weirdo.

830

:

So that's something to consider.

831

:

The, the pendulum, the

behavioral pendulum is swinging.

832

:

It's a little bit more centrist.

833

:

The gold has, has some

returns that back it.

834

:

It's, we've got a number of concerns

that gold can respond well to, whether

835

:

those are geopolitical concerns, whether

those fiscal dominance, monetary,

836

:

there, there's some things that, that

evolve to make gold sort of a key

837

:

part of the portfolio, especially as

bonds start to potentially falter.

838

:

So it's going to garner some acceptance.

839

:

So now how are you as an allocator

or an advisor gonna start building

840

:

that non-correlated source

of returns into portfolios?

841

:

Bitcoin's going through the

same evolution, starting from

842

:

a much smaller base, obviously.

843

:

but again, how are you gonna

think through allocating to these

844

:

types of things in your portfolio?

845

:

Do you wanna take some of the

things that you know, love and

846

:

trust out, sell some of your stocks

and bonds, and do diversification

847

:

through subtraction possible?

848

:

Or do you wanna do diversification

through addition where you

849

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Well, let's talk

about that, the difference between

850

:

those two from a behavioral perspective,

because I don't think that gets enough

851

:

airtime in terms of when you, let's

say, everything Trump solves everything.

852

:

we have, we take care of the debt.

853

:

the US becomes a reserve currency again.

854

:

Everybody starts behaving.

855

:

No more wars.

856

:

You know, that's obviously

gonna affect gold negatively.

857

:

And if you've just chosen to have an

allocation of gold, you'll, if you've

858

:

made, sold your equities in order to get

gold, you are not only losing whatever

859

:

the 20% that gold might give you, you

are losing out an opportunity cost of

860

:

that equity component that may be up 30%.

861

:

Right?

862

:

So you're getting a double whammy by, in

terms of allocating when you make room

863

:

in your portfolio for these diversifiers.

864

:

Whereas when you stack 'em on top,

you're at the very least not having

865

:

that opportunity cost of owning the

equities in case they go up 20%.

866

:

You're still having a little bit

of tailwind, but you're cer you're

867

:

certainly cutting it by a lot.

868

:

Right?

869

:

So in terms of wrapping your mind

around adding weird things, you

870

:

know, you, I think everybody here

knows that, that we think that a

871

:

good solution here is stacking.

872

:

and, and, yeah.

873

:

And then you gotta decide when, right?

874

:

Like we, that's right now, even though

I've been an advocate of gold from the

875

:

beginning of my career, when people come

to me now and they say, should I allocate?

876

:

And I'm like, yeah.

877

:

Yeah, you need to allocate.

878

:

And, and then I have to go

back to these reports and be

879

:

like, okay, what's happening?

880

:

Like, why, why is this still,

why should I not be timing this

881

:

as much as, uh, as I want to?

882

:

And just the evidence is so like even

the Chinese government with the, the

883

:

capital controls, you know, nobody's

gonna invest in like a few people

884

:

invest in the stock market unless

they're really gambling in inside China.

885

:

Like apparently the only thing

that they can invest in without

886

:

a lot of control is gold.

887

:

And that's a large part as to

why all of this is happening.

888

:

And as it become more insular, I think

that's another interesting secular trend.

889

:

La Latin America, emerging markets

are buying more and more gold.

890

:

Mike Philbrick: Well, that, that was the,

that was the theme from last year, right?

891

:

That that would start to happen.

892

:

And the theme this year is now, now

we're, it's, it's the big long, right?

893

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: yeah,

now it's broad acceptance.

894

:

Now it's, I mean.

895

:

Mike Philbrick: is the part where

you, when you get the broader

896

:

acceptance, you're now gonna

start to get the green light.

897

:

Whether you're an allocator, working

with an institution or pension fund,

898

:

or you're an advisor working with,

individual families, you're gonna

899

:

start to get the green light to be

able to incorporate this and not sort

900

:

of compromise the, the relationship.

901

:

Right.

902

:

Not call into question the relationship

for doing something that's too weird.

903

:

And that, that's a real challenge in

managing assets on behalf of other

904

:

people is, you know, you wanna do

the mathematically correct thing and

905

:

the preferences of the individual

investor sometimes get involved and

906

:

don't allow for that to take place.

907

:

That, that's, that's about

as common as anything in this

908

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: And, and one thing

that I've learned quite a lot from, with

909

:

the com when it comes to macro cycles

is, Bob Elliott, who constantly reminds

910

:

us about how long it takes for macro

cycles to actually play out, right?

911

:

They take years, if not decades, to

fully play out to their maximum extent.

912

:

When, like, even, even the, the recent

disinflationary growth period where

913

:

equities kept on going up, right?

914

:

It was like there was a straight line

with a low volatility bonds, 40 years.

915

:

Like these are long secular

cycles that we've seen and bonds

916

:

have finally broken, right?

917

:

And it took 40 years for them to, to

break in any meaningful way whatsoever.

918

:

And so when you think about.

919

:

Just the concept of,

okay, price of gold is up.

920

:

Well, there's gonna be all this demand.

921

:

Where are we gonna get

the, the supply from?

922

:

Nowhere.

923

:

It's gonna take 10 years

to build more supply.

924

:

You know, we still, we're not, I'm

not seeing any commercials to, to

925

:

sell my, my gold jewelry to get gold,

926

:

Mike Philbrick: Not yet.

927

:

That will be a sign though.

928

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: that will

definitely be a sign right.

929

:

When you like, these are the,

930

:

Mike Philbrick: melting down the

silver, uh, the silver forks and spoons.

931

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah.

932

:

So when I think about it that

way, I, I got, that gives me,

933

:

okay, I need to have this as part

of my core strategic portfolio.

934

:

Right.

935

:

It's not gonna be a fun ride on

its own, but it is a portfolio.

936

:

Mike Philbrick: yeah.

937

:

And allocate.

938

:

This is the nice thing.

939

:

You can allocate it.

940

:

into the portfolio over time.

941

:

Like, you do not have to take the

approach that today is the day where I'm

942

:

gonna allocate the full X amount, right?

943

:

So let's say you, you come to the

conclusion that, well, alright,

944

:

this is an asset class I probably

should have 10, 10% in the portfolio.

945

:

So what are the steps I'm gonna take?

946

:

Well, let's buy 1% today.

947

:

Let's get it on the books,

let's get, let's get started.

948

:

Because when you own it, you watch it

and you get familiar with it, and you

949

:

get some intuition as to how the asset

responds in different circumstances.

950

:

And that's always something that's,

that's a bit challenging and unique.

951

:

When something has gone to, through

the process of becoming a 1% allocation

952

:

across investors' portfolios, they're

really not paying attention to it, right?

953

:

So build up your intuition

and your tolerance.

954

:

How, because it's gonna be,

some days you're gonna look at

955

:

it and go, this thing's stupid.

956

:

And then other days you're gonna be

like, oh my gosh, wow, look at that.

957

:

And you're gonna get a sense for that.

958

:

And then it allows you to build the,

and this is both at the institutional

959

:

level and the retail level.

960

:

This is across all things.

961

:

When you don't have an intuition

for an asset class, 'cause

962

:

you haven't dealt with it.

963

:

And I would assume, you know, most people

are, are of the age that a lot of times

964

:

they don't have a lot of experience

with gold in, in the markets today.

965

:

So they're gonna have to

build up that intuition.

966

:

So start small, like, but start.

967

:

And, and look at how it

interacts with your portfolio.

968

:

And then, you know, in, in our, as you've,

as you've mentioned so eloquently already,

969

:

our perspective is you don't need to

sell what's in your portfolio to add

970

:

these diversifiers to stack them on top.

971

:

And that will help alleviate some of the

tracking error that comes from those times

972

:

when those main assets are doing great.

973

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: Yeah, I mean, I think,

I think we're moving the needle, Mike.

974

:

I think we're gonna take

this from 1% to two.

975

:

Mike Philbrick: Let's do it.

976

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: I'm

feeling it this time.

977

:

It's crazy because we literally have

had this conversation in every room that

978

:

we stepped in since the day I met you.

979

:

Mike Philbrick: and I know, and I feel

as though, like, I get painted as a

980

:

gold bug I'm just, I'm a gold centrist.

981

:

I'm not a gold bug.

982

:

I

983

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: we're not, we

don't have outrageous weightings

984

:

of gold in our portfolios.

985

:

Mike Philbrick: at all.

986

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: just not zero.

987

:

It's not zero.

988

:

Mike Philbrick: Exactly.

989

:

Exactly.

990

:

Rodrigo Gordillo: still have a bunch

of people waiting, um, and watching.

991

:

I'm just curious if

anybody has any questions.

992

:

I'm just gonna go up and

see if there were any.

993

:

There are some things

we can't discuss here.

994

:

Uh, volatility drag a problem

with UGL on daily reset.

995

:

Okay.

996

:

So UGL is the double bowl, I think, right?

997

:

Yeah.

998

:

so

999

:

Mike Philbrick: Yeah.

:

00:50:26,144 --> 00:50:26,774

So that's, yeah.

:

00:50:26,774 --> 00:50:27,314

Let you go.

:

00:50:27,314 --> 00:50:27,524

Go

:

00:50:27,584 --> 00:50:30,074

Rodrigo Gordillo: we've, we've

discussed volatility drag quite a bit.

:

00:50:30,104 --> 00:50:31,964

There's a couple articles

on the return stack site.

:

00:50:31,994 --> 00:50:35,384

If you look up volatility drag, you'll,

you'll get to understand a little bit

:

00:50:35,384 --> 00:50:40,761

more about, whether it's even a thing

that, uh, you need to worry about from

:

00:50:40,761 --> 00:50:42,171

a portfolio construction perspective.

:

00:50:42,171 --> 00:50:47,601

Like there is no shame in using 2x levered

anything as long as you are rebalancing

:

00:50:47,961 --> 00:50:51,081

and you are, you are rebalancing it

against other non-correlated stuff.

:

00:50:51,621 --> 00:50:58,001

Volatility drag, is, is basically,

you know, when you, when you 2x an

:

00:50:58,001 --> 00:51:04,301

asset class, what tends to happen

is your variance goes up by 4x

:

00:51:04,521 --> 00:51:09,650

and your, compound rate of return

is the variance of the portfolio.

:

00:51:10,070 --> 00:51:13,980

It's half the variance of, uh, is your

arithmetic rate of return minus half

:

00:51:13,980 --> 00:51:15,090

the variance of the portfolio, right?

:

00:51:15,090 --> 00:51:18,390

So what you end up getting

penalized if you are just owning

:

00:51:18,390 --> 00:51:20,820

that asset at 2x of volatility.

:

00:51:20,820 --> 00:51:26,760

But that doesn't just apply to 2x S&P

or 2x gold, it applies to 2x anything.

:

00:51:26,820 --> 00:51:31,980

If you are increasing the volatility

of your portfolio, whatever it is,

:

00:51:31,980 --> 00:51:35,970

you are increasing the variance

and you are getting a drag from the

:

00:51:35,970 --> 00:51:40,020

compounding of, or negative compounding

of that, like that variance drag.

:

00:51:40,530 --> 00:51:45,645

But if you are increasing

leverage in order to have a

:

00:51:45,645 --> 00:51:47,325

more diversified portfolio.

:

00:51:47,535 --> 00:51:51,049

We, we use the example in one of the

podcasts that we did, where you talk

:

00:51:51,049 --> 00:51:55,699

about the 2x S&P 500 versus stacking

a hundred percent S&P and a hundred

:

00:51:55,699 --> 00:51:56,989

percent trend following, for example.

:

00:51:57,589 --> 00:52:02,599

When you stack a hundred percent S&P, your

volatility is actually, you're, you're

:

00:52:02,599 --> 00:52:06,772

getting, you're not getting twice the

return, and your volatility is, doubling.

:

00:52:07,522 --> 00:52:11,122

When you are stacking a non-correlated

def, what we call defensive leverage

:

00:52:11,122 --> 00:52:15,889

on top, you're stacking the return,

but because it's non-correlated to

:

00:52:15,889 --> 00:52:19,789

the underlying asset, you're not

increasing your, necessarily the,

:

00:52:19,909 --> 00:52:22,639

the standard deviation and therefore

your variance drag is much lower.

:

00:52:22,909 --> 00:52:23,269

Okay.

:

00:52:23,899 --> 00:52:27,319

And so it just, the, the answer

is it depends on how you use it.

:

00:52:28,279 --> 00:52:31,969

Okay, so, so use it for

portfolio construction.

:

00:52:31,969 --> 00:52:33,499

Use it to create robust portfolios.

:

00:52:33,499 --> 00:52:37,069

Make sure you're rebalancing and if

you do it, it's a great instrument.

:

00:52:37,069 --> 00:52:40,579

It's volatility that you can use

to, to create rebalancing premium.

:

00:52:41,280 --> 00:52:44,830

Mike Philbrick: The, um, those,

those, I would, I would add one final,

:

00:52:44,920 --> 00:52:48,100

you know, UGL, that type of thing,

where it's two x at the same asset.

:

00:52:48,160 --> 00:52:52,000

Those are, those are often trading

assets, so you should be engaged in

:

00:52:52,000 --> 00:52:54,040

the, in the trading of the assets.

:

00:52:54,040 --> 00:52:57,730

As, as you've mentioned, they regear

up every day, so if you make 10%,

:

00:52:57,730 --> 00:52:59,170

they're gonna regear that up tomorrow.

:

00:52:59,770 --> 00:53:03,675

At some point you get, you know, lots

of leverage built into your position

:

00:53:03,855 --> 00:53:08,355

and you have a correction, and that's

where you get that volatility drag.

:

00:53:08,625 --> 00:53:12,015

But if you were harvesting that and

saying, well, no, I'm, I'm, I'm gonna

:

00:53:12,015 --> 00:53:15,525

trim a little as it goes up, and

then I'm gonna add a little when it

:

00:53:15,525 --> 00:53:19,935

goes down, you can attenuate that

and, and you might do that with cash,

:

00:53:19,935 --> 00:53:21,195

you might do that with other assets.

:

00:53:21,200 --> 00:53:25,305

It, it, it's all fine, but it does

require, the leveraging is daily and

:

00:53:25,305 --> 00:53:27,285

the asset is somewhat volatile at times.

:

00:53:27,285 --> 00:53:30,105

So it can require adjustments daily.

:

00:53:30,315 --> 00:53:32,925

If, if, if you're doing that

type of thing, it, it's fine.

:

00:53:33,225 --> 00:53:36,345

Certainly when we're looking at

futures contracts and things like that

:

00:53:36,465 --> 00:53:39,705

in portfolios that we're managing,

those are reviewed daily and are

:

00:53:39,705 --> 00:53:44,175

rebalanced, you know, brought back in

line on, on a regular basis because

:

00:53:44,175 --> 00:53:48,335

the volatility with the, the leverage

and the other pieces of the puzzle.

:

00:53:48,395 --> 00:53:48,605

Right.

:

00:53:48,605 --> 00:53:49,955

The other positions in the portfolio,

:

00:53:50,510 --> 00:53:53,270

Rodrigo Gordillo: Look, when it comes to

leverage, we always talk about internally

:

00:53:53,270 --> 00:53:56,990

that, that you don't want, when it comes

to leverage, you don't want LICE, and LICE

:

00:53:56,990 --> 00:54:02,630

stands for leverage that, is illiquid,

concentrated or excessive, right?

:

00:54:02,630 --> 00:54:06,770

So in this case, we're talking about a,

a liquid product, but it is concentrated

:

00:54:06,770 --> 00:54:09,440

and it can be excessive depending

on how much you put into it, right?

:

00:54:10,070 --> 00:54:12,470

And so you just wanna avoid

LICE when it comes to leverage.

:

00:54:12,680 --> 00:54:17,210

And, and what you really want it to be

is, is, is part of a portfolio, or you

:

00:54:17,210 --> 00:54:19,760

want to stack it with other things.

:

00:54:20,300 --> 00:54:23,960

And, and if you're gonna use leverage,

use what we call defensive leverage,

:

00:54:23,960 --> 00:54:27,380

things that are non-correlated to

the thing that the, the main stack

:

00:54:27,380 --> 00:54:29,300

that you are, that you're gonna use.

:

00:54:29,300 --> 00:54:33,260

So if, if you keep that in mind, you are

gonna minimize the chances of blowing up.

:

00:54:33,757 --> 00:54:34,207

All right?

:

00:54:34,777 --> 00:54:35,767

We're coming up to an hour.

:

00:54:35,827 --> 00:54:38,347

Mike, anything that, that we may

have missed that you want to chat?

:

00:54:38,789 --> 00:54:41,969

Mike Philbrick: Uh, no, I think, I think

we've covered just about everything

:

00:54:41,969 --> 00:54:43,709

that we wanted to, uh, discuss.

:

00:54:43,709 --> 00:54:45,689

I think the report is well worthwhile.

:

00:54:45,779 --> 00:54:51,159

Um, we've got one of the, portfolio

managers at Incrementum that's gonna

:

00:54:51,159 --> 00:54:55,029

join us in June, and we'll take a

little bit more into the report itself

:

00:54:55,029 --> 00:54:59,259

and talk a little bit more of the,

uh, the intricacies of, of the gold

:

00:54:59,259 --> 00:55:02,229

market itself, things that, that what,

where we'll learn some stuff as well.

:

00:55:02,529 --> 00:55:06,009

So look forward to that and, uh,

look forward to tuning in with that.

:

00:55:06,009 --> 00:55:09,895

And I think, you know, the other thing

is every year that he was, um, in

:

00:55:09,895 --> 00:55:13,345

talking with the, the guys over there,

they've noted that every year when they

:

00:55:13,345 --> 00:55:15,445

launch the report, gold is, goes down.

:

00:55:16,960 --> 00:55:17,230

Rodrigo Gordillo: now what

:

00:55:17,305 --> 00:55:17,727

Mike Philbrick: It's just, it's just

:

00:55:17,830 --> 00:55:18,610

Rodrigo Gordillo:

Because they launched it.

:

00:55:18,610 --> 00:55:20,620

They launched it into

a poor seasonal period.

:

00:55:20,620 --> 00:55:25,900

Or like we, we do seasonality and I think

gold is entering a poor seasonal period,

:

00:55:25,900 --> 00:55:27,520

which is gonna be a great entry point.

:

00:55:28,000 --> 00:55:28,600

Mike Philbrick: Exactly.

:

00:55:28,840 --> 00:55:31,780

Starting start, start

your allocation today.

:

00:55:31,780 --> 00:55:34,090

Go slow, go steady, get the intuition.

:

00:55:34,330 --> 00:55:36,587

You're gonna see that, public opinion.

:

00:55:36,797 --> 00:55:39,767

This is, you know, for what

it's worth, from my perspective,

:

00:55:40,097 --> 00:55:41,357

public opinion is changing.

:

00:55:41,357 --> 00:55:42,947

We're entering that public phase.

:

00:55:43,157 --> 00:55:46,487

We're seeing that in the

AUM growth in, in the ETFs.

:

00:55:46,727 --> 00:55:48,407

So it's something to look at and consider.

:

00:55:48,407 --> 00:55:52,964

And how you might allocate to that there

are many ways to, to slice that, sandwich.

:

00:55:53,384 --> 00:55:56,174

Uh, we would, we would encourage

you to look at the idea of return

:

00:55:56,174 --> 00:55:57,764

stacking as a way to incorporate it.

:

00:55:58,304 --> 00:56:00,974

And, uh, if you have any questions

as always, reach out to us and,

:

00:56:01,079 --> 00:56:02,909

Rodrigo Gordillo: You know, we've got a

couple minutes and they, there's a couple

:

00:56:02,909 --> 00:56:04,139

of questions that I do want to answer.

:

00:56:04,189 --> 00:56:04,379

sorry.

:

00:56:04,519 --> 00:56:06,344

So they were talking about

borrowing costs, right?

:

00:56:06,344 --> 00:56:09,044

So the, you know, it

depends on how you borrow.

:

00:56:09,044 --> 00:56:12,814

You can get, again, if you're using,

There's a bunch of product out there

:

00:56:12,814 --> 00:56:16,624

that is, that is helping you create

capital efficiency by making revenue

:

00:56:16,624 --> 00:56:21,404

on your portfolio, by giving you

like, WisdomTree as a 90 60, right?

:

00:56:21,404 --> 00:56:24,974

You're getting, you're getting

leverage at the cheapest possible level

:

00:56:25,364 --> 00:56:27,664

of, on the futures markets, right?

:

00:56:27,664 --> 00:56:28,264

So yes.

:

00:56:28,684 --> 00:56:32,734

What you're gonna need to de decide

is what you're stacking, is it

:

00:56:32,734 --> 00:56:35,224

likely to do better than cash?

:

00:56:35,554 --> 00:56:35,854

Right?

:

00:56:35,944 --> 00:56:42,034

And what, what we've seen, what we've

shown you from gold, is that gold has

:

00:56:42,334 --> 00:56:44,044

had positive real rates of return.

:

00:56:44,044 --> 00:56:48,344

So when you think about creating

portfolios, especially in the

:

00:56:48,344 --> 00:56:51,644

context of return stacking, it

really is like, the way I think

:

00:56:51,644 --> 00:56:52,964

about it is Lego blocks, right?

:

00:56:53,624 --> 00:56:57,224

See if I have different colored Lego

blocks here you have your equity.

:

00:56:57,484 --> 00:56:59,744

let's assume that this is, you

got your equity risk premium.

:

00:57:00,299 --> 00:57:04,409

That you are going to buy and get

exposure to, you're gonna get your bond

:

00:57:04,469 --> 00:57:08,195

risk term premium that you're gonna

eventually over the long term get, you

:

00:57:08,195 --> 00:57:09,965

know, paid for taking duration risk.

:

00:57:10,445 --> 00:57:12,785

And then let's say that's a

hundred portfolio, then you gotta

:

00:57:12,785 --> 00:57:15,695

decide, okay, what excess returns

can I count on to be there?

:

00:57:15,725 --> 00:57:17,765

Well, it turns out the gold

has had pretty decent excess

:

00:57:17,765 --> 00:57:19,955

returns in the last 40 years.

:

00:57:19,955 --> 00:57:23,435

So then you're whatever excess returns

that end, that's you're stacking

:

00:57:23,435 --> 00:57:27,875

that return on top, and then you find

another, thing that you want to stack,

:

00:57:27,875 --> 00:57:32,939

whether it's, uh, know, managed future

trend or, merger arbitrage or, you

:

00:57:32,939 --> 00:57:36,959

know, market neutral portfolios that

you can, you can literally decide

:

00:57:36,959 --> 00:57:39,809

to stack all of these different risk

premiums that are non-correlated to

:

00:57:39,809 --> 00:57:44,519

each other, to the level of portfolio

volatility that you can stomach, right?

:

00:57:44,519 --> 00:57:47,099

So yes, everything costs, to stack.

:

00:57:47,159 --> 00:57:48,419

It's always the risk-free rate.

:

00:57:49,199 --> 00:57:53,309

But every asset that we've

discussed today has had a

:

00:57:53,309 --> 00:57:55,589

long-term excess return above cash.

:

00:57:55,979 --> 00:57:59,969

And if you feel like you can count

on that over a long enough time

:

00:57:59,969 --> 00:58:04,979

horizon, then really you're just

stacking excess returns plus the cash

:

00:58:04,979 --> 00:58:07,319

premium you get on your core holdings.

:

00:58:07,499 --> 00:58:07,739

Right?

:

00:58:07,769 --> 00:58:09,539

So, hope that answers your question.

:

00:58:09,649 --> 00:58:14,059

and yeah, if you guys ha want to reach

out and ask any further questions, you

:

00:58:14,059 --> 00:58:17,602

can reach out at, RodGordilloP on Twitter.

:

00:58:17,742 --> 00:58:19,722

Mike, what's your,

what's your handle, Mike?

:

00:58:19,722 --> 00:58:20,202

99.

:

00:58:20,202 --> 00:58:20,952

Is it still?

:

00:58:21,762 --> 00:58:24,372

Yeah, Mike, that's his,

his, uh, football jersey.

:

00:58:25,002 --> 00:58:25,982

Mike Philbrick: MikePhilbrick99.

:

00:58:26,592 --> 00:58:27,462

Rodrigo Gordillo: MikePhilbrick99.

:

00:58:28,189 --> 00:58:31,639

And, uh, please, you know,

this is not investment advice.

:

00:58:31,639 --> 00:58:34,219

This is just a couple guys talking

about some research that we

:

00:58:34,219 --> 00:58:35,689

thought was interesting to share.

:

00:58:36,099 --> 00:58:39,909

and be happy to, to discuss further

offline for anybody who wants to do that.

:

00:58:40,209 --> 00:58:43,969

And, uh, looking forward to that gold

conversation continuing June, Mike.

:

00:58:44,779 --> 00:58:46,729

Thanks for, thanks for

it was your initiative.

:

00:58:46,729 --> 00:58:48,109

I, I really enjoyed this conversation.

:

00:58:48,109 --> 00:58:48,589

Thank you for that.

:

00:58:49,229 --> 00:58:49,509

Mike Philbrick: Absolutely.

:

00:58:49,899 --> 00:58:50,989

Stay diversified everyone.

:

00:58:51,829 --> 00:58:52,069

Rodrigo Gordillo: All right.

:

00:58:52,369 --> 00:58:52,879

See y'all.

:

00:58:53,009 --> 00:58:53,619

Mike Philbrick: See ya.

Follow

Links

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube