Artwork for podcast Tracking Wisdom
Exploring the Intersection of Nanophysics and Consciousness
Episode 41 • 3rd September 2026 • Tracking Wisdom • Ears That Hear Media Corporation
00:00:00 00:27:14

Share Episode

Transcripts

Peter:

You're listening to the Tracking Wisdom Podcast, exploring the universal

2

:

truths that we see woven through culture,

consciousness, and the human experience.

3

:

Ryan: Good morning everybody, and

welcome back to another episode

4

:

of the Tracking Wisdom Podcast.

5

:

I'm Ryan,

6

:

Peter: I'm Peter,

7

:

Ryan: and today I wanted to talk about Dr.

8

:

Anita Goel.

9

:

So this is a physicist and MD

that we came across in yet another

10

:

Essentia Foundation interview.

11

:

Dr.

12

:

Anita Goel, MD PhD, she's a physicist

and world renowned expert and pioneering

13

:

in the emerging field of nano physics.

14

:

And she is a physicist by training

and has been enamored or, inspired

15

:

by, nano machinery, nanotechnology and

in particular she has a focus on DNA

16

:

transcription and DNA polymerase as a

nano machine, and has some theories around

17

:

how it might be interacting with quantum

mechanics and how using the biological

18

:

system, the living systems, which in

are inherently open versus the classical

19

:

physics and the work that's been done

historically on closed systems, how

20

:

studying that may help us make strides in

closing the gap that Einstein, Schrodinger

21

:

Penrose and the like have all acknowledged

that there's something missing,

22

:

something not quite complete about our

understanding of quantum mechanics.

23

:

And she has a, a theory that studying

this understanding, not only the

24

:

nanotechnology itself, but essentially

if her theories are proven to be, sound,

25

:

that we could use that as a quantum

sensor . That we could use biological

26

:

systems and their interaction with

the quantum field quantum mechanics to

27

:

detect those interactions and further

our understanding of quantum mechanics.

28

:

Is that a fair way of

29

:

Peter: Yeah, I think that the point

of the idea of the quantum detector is

30

:

that the system, so the D.N.A./D.N.A.

31

:

polymerase experimental system,

can be developed into, technology

32

:

that can be used to create the

equivalent of a double slit experiment

33

:

. Ryan: Right.

34

:

Peter: So, as you were saying, you know,

she points out that, quantum theory is

35

:

incomplete, and a way of reducing the

incompleteness is to turn away from

36

:

inanimate closed systems and start

to look at living systems, because

37

:

it'll just give us a different view.

38

:

I mean, everything that we

know is from experimentalists.

39

:

Well, I mean, not just

experimentalists theorists too, right?

40

:

Mm-hmm.

41

:

Ignoring living systems, because

living systems are too messy.

42

:

And, because of her work in Nanosystems

and her ability to manipulate living

43

:

systems and make them tractable

to experimentation, she's like,

44

:

oh no, they're not too messy.

45

:

And I think part of her.

46

:

Thing too is that the apparent messiness,

may have to do with the intrinsic

47

:

involvement of quantum effects.

48

:

Ryan: Hmm.

49

:

Peter: She says some clearer things

about quantum effects and living systems,

50

:

which are really interesting, but, the

big goal, at least that they're talking

51

:

about in this conversation, is to create

something like the double slit experiment.

52

:

Something that clearly demonstrates the

properties of quantum physics, but using a

53

:

completely new kind of experimental setup.

54

:

And it's not to duplicate the, mm-hmm.

55

:

Double slit, but an experiment that

has the impact of the double split

56

:

experiment and that it's a very

clear demonstration of, well the

57

:

double split experiment demonstrates

the kind of dual nature of light as

58

:

wave and particle at the same time.

59

:

The double slit experiment

demonstrates ensemble behavior.

60

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

61

:

Peter: And so, she's looking for a kind

of experiment to do in a biological

62

:

system, specifically her nanotech

setup with DNA and DNA polymerase,

63

:

and she says that the roadmap is

there, needs a lot more resource to

64

:

refine the resolution of the system,

65

:

Ryan: mm-hmm,

66

:

Peter: in order to set up the

correct kind of experiment.

67

:

Ryan: Yeah.

68

:

Peter: And then goes far field

later on into her own kind

69

:

of intuitive understanding

70

:

of the nature of, I guess

reality and consciousness.

71

:

Ryan: Yeah.

72

:

Peter: To some extent.

73

:

Ryan: Yeah.

74

:

And one thing that I did find interesting

is how, number one, she presented

75

:

the idealist paradigm, but, as we had

mentioned in previous episodes, it

76

:

seems that the scientists that we've

come in contact with that are on the

77

:

idealist side of the conversation,

all appear to have had a precipitating

78

:

experiential event, that then led

them to use their scientific skills

79

:

and knowledge to pursue this avenue.

80

:

And she, from all accounts that we can

tell, is the first one that I can recall

81

:

that came to this purely scientifically.

82

:

Peter: Intellectually.

83

:

Ryan: Intellectually and theoretically,

that we keep bumping up against walls with

84

:

the classical approach and the materialist

paradigm, specifically around the quantum

85

:

measurement problem and the hard problem

of consciousness that , by flipping

86

:

that on its head and starting with the

consciousness first paradigm, these

87

:

things become more readily answerable.

88

:

But she's very adamant

about using rigorous.

89

:

Yeah.

90

:

scientific approach and data.

91

:

And she has a very high

bar for her research.

92

:

She was saying she has high hopes for it,

but she's also her highest critic where

93

:

she's, very, stringent on making sure that

the output of this research is rigorous.

94

:

And that, it also encompasses

and answers all the classical

95

:

things that we already know.

96

:

That all has to be part of what comes

out of the experiment and the theory.

97

:

She's particularly interested

in the medicine side of things.

98

:

We've all benefited from, utility of

quantum mechanics with the smartphones

99

:

and things like that, quantum computing.

100

:

Peter: In terms of healthcare,

CAT scans, MRIs, x-rays.

101

:

Ryan: Sure.

102

:

Right.

103

:

Peter: Those are, yeah.

104

:

Ryan: And, she made a very specific

comment that medicine is essentially

105

:

still stuck in the biochemical.

106

:

Peter: So yeah, I mean it's this

kind of roadblock of knowledge

107

:

or dead end that we've hit just

I think in knowledge in general.

108

:

Ryan: Right.

109

:

Peter: There's a lot of discussion

about how, as you said, the founders of

110

:

quantum mechanics were very frustrated

with the incompleteness of the theory.

111

:

Which is what Schrodinger's cat is,

is a satirizing and exaggeration

112

:

of the problems of the theory,

the shortcoming of the theory.

113

:

And that, it's not just physics

that hit that roadblock.

114

:

Ryan: Right.

115

:

Peter: Like all the other disciplines,

like medicine is limited because

116

:

essentially medicine is completely

dependent on chemistry and physics.

117

:

Ryan: Right.

118

:

Peter: You know, she was a physician

who decided to become a physicist.

119

:

And her vision is that by breaking

through this roadblock in physics,

120

:

we can open huge horizons in, in

medicine, healthcare, and, and beyond.

121

:

Ryan: Right.

122

:

Peter: Because of course, every time

you crack the limitations of physics,

123

:

you open up incredible new technologies.

124

:

So yeah, she's a very, I

think, what's the word?

125

:

Free thinker?

126

:

Like visionary.

127

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

128

:

Peter: Very visionary, but, also very,

very committed to grounding herself.

129

:

And she's like, I have to play like a

child and dream big and then constrain

130

:

myself to what can we measure.

131

:

Ryan: Right.

132

:

Peter: And how can I figure

out how to measure it?

133

:

And she just goes back and forth

between these, these states.

134

:

Which kind of reminds me of Hoffman.

135

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

136

:

Peter: Talking about meditating,

137

:

Ryan: yeah,

138

:

Peter: and then doing science.

139

:

Ryan: Right.

140

:

Peter: Right?

141

:

And swinging between those states.

142

:

So you already mentioned,

open versus closed systems.

143

:

Ryan: Yeah.

144

:

Peter: Physical experimental systems

being inanimate and closed and being

145

:

at or near equilibrium, as she says.

146

:

And then living systems are open systems

that are, never very near equilibrium.

147

:

They're constantly building.

148

:

Ryan: Yeah.

149

:

Peter: She uses the term negentropic,

which I just thought was great.

150

:

And she talks about current physics and

future physics, current physics being

151

:

matter and energy and future physics

adding information into the equation,

152

:

that's her vision is to break through.

153

:

And her intention is to refine this

nanotech biological system that she works

154

:

with, to sufficient resolution to perform

this experiment; we don't know what it

155

:

would be, that will crack the barrier

156

:

Ryan: mm-hmm

157

:

Peter: of quantum physics.

158

:

Ryan: So she, specifically about the

DNA polymerase, is enamored by both

159

:

the energy efficiency of the molecule,

and its processing volume and speed.

160

:

She speaks to how the DNA polymerase

as it's transcribing and building

161

:

does a hundred billion computational

steps per 10 milliseconds.

162

:

And will be able to error correct

itself when there's mutations.

163

:

She does talk a little bit about whether

those mutations are random versus

164

:

environmental or quantum, and this is

part of where she's going with this is

165

:

to determine if there is a consequential

quantum and environmental element , that's

166

:

where information comes in, versus

something that's Darwinian and is random.

167

:

Peter: So you were starting to say

that she's interested in the polymerase

168

:

as a machine, as an nano machine.

169

:

Ryan: Right.

170

:

Peter: And she suspects that the way

DNA polymerase works, may be exploiting

171

:

quantum effects, in a non-trivial

way, for function and efficiency.

172

:

So you named the function of calculate

a hundred billion steps per base pair.

173

:

So each time the polymerase reads a

base of DNA, it needs to perform a

174

:

hundred billion computational steps

in order to find the correct base to

175

:

attach to the base that it wants to

connect, to build the matching strand.

176

:

But the other piece of it is that,

the polymerase is also acting as a

177

:

molecular motor, because it's moving

mechanically along the DNA strand.

178

:

And as a molecular motor, it's 99.9%

179

:

efficient.

180

:

And she says that, compared to 20 to

40% for an internal combustion engine.

181

:

Ryan: Right.

182

:

Peter: That these two extraordinary

features of the nano machine suggest to

183

:

her that something strange is going on,

184

:

Ryan: right,

185

:

Peter: that's beyond the

purview of just regular physics.

186

:

And so she suspects that there are quantum

effects happening, or that the polymerase

187

:

is exploiting quantum effects in some

ways, to give itself these superpowers.

188

:

Ryan: And I think that those are

both indicators, and potential uses.

189

:

Right?

190

:

If we understand better how

it manages to achieve a 99.9%

191

:

energy efficiency, that that could help

us in the material world to achieve

192

:

better efficiencies in energy usage.

193

:

And then she did say specifically,

the non-trivial quantum effects is the

194

:

question that starts the whole thing.

195

:

The effects of the quantum

collapse, and the coherence,

196

:

historically has been dismissed as

trivial to the biological system.

197

:

Her first step in pursuing this

theory is to determine does the

198

:

collapse happen before the end of

the computational phase, or after.

199

:

So if it extends long enough, then

we can interpret that there is a

200

:

potential for non-trivial impact of

quantum mechanics, versus if it happens

201

:

so fast that it would be trivial.

202

:

Peter: So does quantum ness

or superposition exist in this

203

:

system, of DNA and polymerase,

204

:

Ryan: long enough

205

:

Peter: long enough to be relevant

to, basically for the time

206

:

needed to read a base pair,

207

:

Ryan: right.

208

:

Peter: Which, as you

said, is 10 milliseconds.

209

:

So she has a specific timeframe for

which she needs to demonstrate the

210

:

sustained coherence of a quantum state.

211

:

Ryan: Yes.

212

:

Peter: I get that there's a thing

called superposition, which means

213

:

you are two things at the same time.

214

:

If you're a cat, you're alive and dead

at the same time, if you're a photon,

215

:

you're a wave and a particle at the

same time, and then at some point

216

:

that superposition collapses or that

quantum coherence has a decoherence.

217

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

218

:

Peter: And when that happens, now you've

gone from an indeterminate state of

219

:

being both things to the determinate

state of being a single thing.

220

:

Ryan: Yeah.

221

:

Peter: Okay, now here's the question.

222

:

Is the coherence very short or very

long ? Because, I read somewhere that

223

:

the reason that we can see photons

collapse is because there are so many

224

:

of them that the odds of some collapsing

at any given time are, are high.

225

:

But that the the timeframe of

decoherence is extremely long.

226

:

Ryan: Mm.

227

:

Peter: Like thousands

or millions of years.

228

:

And the, the only reason that we

see the decoherence is because

229

:

of these huge numbers of events

that we're we're considering.

230

:

On the other hand, I thought I

understood that superposition only

231

:

happens for infinitesimally small

amounts of time before collapse.

232

:

And then Penrose says it's all about,

okay, now we're in the measurement

233

:

problem because we're saying, oh, it's

not about the time, it's about whether

234

:

there's an observer or not, because the

observer is what creates the collapse.

235

:

And Penrose says, no, it's not

about an observer, that's garbage,

236

:

gravity is what creates the collapse.

237

:

And i'm not even sure how

that happens, because does,

238

:

Ryan: well I think he was, he was

talking about how Mass had impact on the

239

:

Peter: so the mass of the thing

allows you to calculate how

240

:

long the coherence will be.

241

:

Ryan: That's what he said.

242

:

Peter: Right.

243

:

Ryan: Yeah.

244

:

Peter: So is he saying it's

very short because photons

245

:

Ryan: are small.

246

:

Peter: Are small so they have very low

247

:

Ryan: or is it the other way around?

248

:

Peter: Gravitational effects, so

therefore they immediately collapse.

249

:

Ryan: Think it's the other way

250

:

Peter: so if you're a planet

251

:

Ryan: saying if, if it's

big, it collapses quickly,

252

:

Peter: immediately, right?

253

:

If you're a planet, you're just a

planet, you're not like two kinds

254

:

of planet, you're not, you're not

dead and alive at the same time.

255

:

But if you're a tiny

photon, you maintain your

256

:

Ryan: quantum state for

a long period of time,

257

:

Peter: for a long period of time.

258

:

Ryan: I think that's what he was saying.

259

:

Peter: Right, so what she's saying

is that the quantum state of the

260

:

DNA polymerase, DNA and polymerase

complex has to be long enough, has

261

:

to be at least 10 milliseconds.

262

:

If she can demonstrate that, then

she knows, okay, that's a relevant

263

:

Ryan: right

264

:

Peter: timeframe.

265

:

For what we're looking at.

266

:

So we can use this for

a quantum experiment,

267

:

Ryan: it at least says that there's.

268

:

Potential for meaningful impact.

269

:

Peter: Meaningful interaction.

270

:

Ryan: Right.

271

:

Peter: Because if it was shorter

than that, then there's no way the

272

:

quantum effect could be impacting

the reading of the base pair.

273

:

Ryan: Right.

274

:

Peter: She cites some other examples

where, so this is leading edge technology,

275

:

experimentalism, or whatever, that

it's not, it's very controversial.

276

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

277

:

Peter: Still, but there are

couple of studies suggesting,

278

:

the presence of non-trivial

quantum effects in living systems.

279

:

And she says there's some studies in

bird navigation, I believe it's bird

280

:

navigation, and in photosynthesis,

which we haven't looked up with this.

281

:

But she does indicate that,

she's not the only one looking at

282

:

quantum effects in living systems.

283

:

But it, it sounds like she's

the one who's most committed to

284

:

creating the definitive experiment.

285

:

Ryan: Right.

286

:

Peter: And she feels like she has

a system that she's working with

287

:

that she can continue to refine

in order to accomplish that.

288

:

Ryan: Right, she has the roadmap.

289

:

She seems to understand what

needs to happen, but that the

290

:

tools and measurements, still

need resolution improvement in

291

:

order to get to what she needs.

292

:

And she cited resource as a main

component of that of course.

293

:

And so she didn't talk

specifically about consciousness,

294

:

except really at two places.

295

:

At the beginning when she was

describing the idealist paradigm, and

296

:

suggesting consciousness first and

everything else comes out of that.

297

:

But then at the end, she went through

her theory and what her intent for her

298

:

experiments and pursuit is, and then

started to describe what she was calling

299

:

the fifth industrial revolution driven

around AI, which is obviously continuing

300

:

to develop, got into taking off her

scientific hat and putting on her humanity

301

:

hat that, as we start to grapple with will

the electronic systems become conscious,

302

:

what is the definition of consciousness?

303

:

The pursuit of understanding consciousness

has been there for a long time.

304

:

It's the hard question that periodically

I think we poke at, but hasn't had

305

:

the urgency, until now, where we have

now a compelling reason to have to,

306

:

really understand and define what is

consciousness, what defines consciousness.

307

:

And beyond that, if we take

the materialist paradigm to its

308

:

natural conclusion, if fact, the

machines take over human activity,

309

:

where is the purpose, right?

310

:

What, where do we find the

value and purpose in life?

311

:

And that the materialist paradigm

sort of shuts it down is basically

312

:

Peter: right

313

:

Ryan: being end.

314

:

Peter: Right.

315

:

And we heard this from Faggin as well.

316

:

Ryan: Yeah.

317

:

Peter: That if you adhere to the materials

paradigm, which is what is creating AI,

318

:

Ryan: right,

319

:

Peter: you maintain this mechanistic

perspective until the mechanisms

320

:

exceed the capabilities of humans.

321

:

And now the mechanisms have

more value than humans.

322

:

And now humanity has destroyed itself

because it's created machines that

323

:

have more value than their creators.

324

:

Ryan: Right.

325

:

Peter: And so, that fact of obvious

conclusion, compels us to shift

326

:

our understanding of consciousness.

327

:

And not to just change your minds,

but to really understand, to really

328

:

answer the question as, you're saying.

329

:

So there's this very dystopian, gloomy

message there, but at the same time, the

330

:

converse is, and this is also I think

something that's we've heard consistently

331

:

from people exploring these kinds of

ideas, that freeing ourselves from the

332

:

materialist paradigm will open infinite

horizons, and usher in a golden age of

333

:

combined spiritualism and technology.

334

:

Ryan: Yeah.

335

:

Peter: And that's something that she

talks pretty strongly about is, we're

336

:

really past the point where we can

talk about oh, it's just technology,

337

:

or, oh, it's just spiritualism.

338

:

She points out that there's thousands of

years of, what I'm going call non-material

339

:

technology, spiritual cultures and systems

and, and disciplines, that are focused

340

:

on the non-material aspect of reality.

341

:

But that they generally come at

the expense of material progress.

342

:

And I think this is maybe

a trivial illustration?

343

:

I don't know if it's a good illustration.

344

:

But the apparent material dominance

of the West over the East, where

345

:

these spiritual traditions are

stronger and more developed.

346

:

And she also mentions indigenous peoples.

347

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

348

:

Peter: So there's another example

of like, yeah, I think you can point

349

:

to pretty poor material success in

those cultures, even though there

350

:

may be exceptional spiritual success.

351

:

Ryan: Right.

352

:

Peter: And that we shouldn't

be having either or.

353

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

354

:

Peter: You know, we shouldn't be

materially supreme and wealthy and have

355

:

amazing technology, and chronically

depressed and anxious and troubled,

356

:

Ryan: right,

357

:

Peter: and sleepless.

358

:

And that it's now is the time to

understand the relationship of

359

:

the material and the non-material.

360

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

361

:

Peter: And I, I was gonna say exploit,

which is not the right term…

362

:

leverage the understanding of both,

to create this abundance and harmony.

363

:

Ryan: Yeah, I mean that, that has

been a consistent message amongst, I

364

:

don't know if it's been explicit with

all the thinkers we've been exploring

365

:

here, but definitely I know this one,

and I think others have described it

366

:

as well, which is, the the historical

mystical philosophy has been, there's

367

:

an interconnectedness with all things.

368

:

And the historical materialist perspective

has been compartmentalizing everything.

369

:

And I think it sounds like the idealist

philosophy has an expected outcome that,

370

:

if proven, the widespread awareness and

understanding of our interconnectedness

371

:

with each other, and the planet, and

all things will lead to better ethics,

372

:

geopolitical and business practices, that

by and large society will be constructive.

373

:

Peter: Yeah.

374

:

I mean, it will transform

our concept of values,

375

:

Ryan: right?

376

:

Peter: Values and value.

377

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

378

:

Peter: I think the, the current Western

industrial idea is that more is better.

379

:

That, I can and have, more than you.

380

:

And if I have more than you,

then I am more valuable than you.

381

:

I think the rise of dystopian fiction

is kind of an exploration of that.

382

:

You know, I, because I think

dystopian fiction is all about

383

:

the devaluation of the human.

384

:

Ryan: Yeah.

385

:

Peter: And tends to be about the

accumulation of power amongst the few.

386

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

387

:

Peter: And the division of haves and

have-nots and, you know, some few people

388

:

at the top on the island are in the sky

or on the special planet or whatever.

389

:

And the protagonists being

the undervalued, struggling

390

:

people without resource.

391

:

Um, and that with a real understanding of

both the nature of consciousness and the

392

:

nature of reality, which will go together.

393

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

394

:

Peter: If we understand the nature

of consciousness, then we will

395

:

understand the nature of reality.

396

:

And once we have that understanding,

this idea of have and have

397

:

not won't make any sense.

398

:

And I think when that shift

happens, where it becomes

399

:

viewed as scientifically proven.

400

:

Ryan: Right?

401

:

Peter: Right.

402

:

It, it has the imprimatur of, oh,

the scientists have shown this.

403

:

Then human culture will be able

to shift back to this harmonious,

404

:

kind of back to the garden, really.

405

:

Right?

406

:

So going way back to Joseph

Campbell and the garden, we lost

407

:

the garden because of an idea.

408

:

Ryan: Yeah.

409

:

Peter: Or knowledge.

410

:

But I mean, basically

it's a way of thinking.

411

:

Ryan: Yeah.

412

:

Peter: That I think it's pretty

trivial to hypothesize that that's

413

:

talking about materialist paradigm.

414

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

415

:

Peter: Once you start thinking

that I know I need clothes.

416

:

Clothes are important.

417

:

Everything to get clothes and,

you know, everything I do.

418

:

And God's not important.

419

:

Ryan: Mm-hmm.

420

:

Peter: It's the fact that

I'm naked, that's important.

421

:

That now you've lost, you've lost

security, you've lost happiness.

422

:

And the consistent message from these

thinkers that we're trying to listen

423

:

to and read is that there's a very real

possibility that, by pursuing science

424

:

in the right way, we can actually bring

humanity from the brink of dystopia, to

425

:

this golden age, return to to harmony.

426

:

Which is a very compelling idea,

a very compelling idea being put

427

:

forward by people who seem not to

be crackpots on the street corner.

428

:

Ryan: Right.

429

:

Peter: I mean, people are

seriously pursuing this.

430

:

Ryan: Yeah.

431

:

Using the scientific method.

432

:

Peter: Mm-hmm.

433

:

Ryan: Well, I found this speaker quite

interesting to listen to, and I was

434

:

inspired that there is a place in the

institution of science to come to this

435

:

intellectually and scientifically.

436

:

Not just from people who have had

experiences, but that there's a growing

437

:

understanding that the materialist

paradigm is limiting us, and it's

438

:

time to start expanding our concept

and considering an alternate view

439

:

of how this all comes together.

440

:

I would definitely encourage

everybody to watch the interview.

441

:

I found it interesting, even if

you're not super scientifically

442

:

inclined, it was interesting.

443

:

So we'll link that and

the Essentia Foundation.

444

:

There's other links to nanobiosym.com,

445

:

that is Dr.

446

:

Goel's company, and also the link to her

plenary discussion, so you could see both

447

:

the interview and her plenary presentation

at the symposium; and if you watch

448

:

it, let us know what you think of it.

449

:

Till next time, talk to you later.

450

:

Peter: Great.

451

:

Thanks.

452

:

Bye.

453

:

Thank you for listening to

the Tracking Wisdom podcast.

454

:

Join us next time as we

continue the discussion.

455

:

Don't forget to follow us on

Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube,

456

:

and visit www.eth-studio.com

457

:

for more information and content

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube