Recorded live at the Exchange ETF Conference, host Ryan Nauman welcomes Christopher Getter, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager at Simplify Asset Management, to discuss why private credit has become a hot—and increasingly scrutinized—topic in wealth and asset management. Getter explains recent idiosyncratic blowups, AI-related disruption risks in tech-heavy private credit, and broader late-stage credit-cycle behavior as spreads tighten and managers reach for yield. He argues concerns are warranted but not comparable to 2008, noting private credit has already repriced with discounts to book value widening north of 20% while high yield spreads remain relatively tight. The conversation highlights liquidity and structure mismatches for retail investors, manager dispersion, and why private credit can offer floating-rate exposure and higher returns—alongside hidden volatility and drawdown risk. Getter also discusses liquid alternatives such as managed futures, currency strategies, and hedged high yield, emphasizing that advisors should look beyond labels, understand true exposures, and ensure investors are compensated for the risks taken.

Learn how Zephyr can help financial advisors create modern diversified portfolios here.

Learn more about Simplify Asset Management here.

00:00 Welcome and Disclosures

00:38 Live From ETF Exchange

01:35 Meet Christopher Getter

01:57 Simplify and Alt ETFs

03:05 Why Private Credit Scrutiny

05:09 Spreads and Pain Priced In

08:05 Systemic Risk or Not

08:50 Not Another 2008

09:48 Late Cycle Credit Behavior

10:30 Retail Fit and Liquidity

12:48 Private vs Public Credit

14:56 Liquid Alternative Options

17:25 High Yield With Hedge

18:19 Advisor Due Diligence

19:33 Wrap Up and Where to Learn More

Connect with Ryan Nauman:

LinkedIn

X

Welcome to the Adjusted for Risk Podcast.

2

00:00:04,980 --> 00:00:09,570

Join myself, Brian Nauman as I

talk market investment economic.

3

00:00:09,570 --> 00:00:12,990

Let's get started in life as

I help prepare you for the

4

00:00:12,990 --> 00:00:14,850

upcoming week in markets.

5

00:00:15,690 --> 00:00:17,880

I work for Zephyr in all of express.

6

00:00:18,725 --> 00:00:23,165

Self in my podcast, guests are

solely of their own opinions and do

7

00:00:23,165 --> 00:00:28,415

not reflect the opinion of Zephyr

or Informa its Payers company.

8

00:00:28,985 --> 00:00:33,305

This podcast is for information

and purposes only and should not be

9

00:00:33,305 --> 00:00:35,735

relied on for investment decisions.

10

00:00:38,625 --> 00:00:42,015

Welcome everyone to zephyr's

Adjusted for Risk podcast.

11

00:00:42,015 --> 00:00:47,915

We are recording on location

at the Exchange ETF conference.

12

00:00:47,915 --> 00:00:49,565

It's been a great couple of days.

13

00:00:49,565 --> 00:00:52,804

I've had some fantastic

conversations and the next one.

14

00:00:52,820 --> 00:00:57,320

I'm sure is gonna be a great conversation

to one that I'm really looking

15

00:00:57,320 --> 00:00:59,870

forward to on a very timely topic.

16

00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:04,400

You know, it's one of the hottest topics

in the wealth and asset management

17

00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:06,440

space has been private credit.

18

00:01:06,950 --> 00:01:11,780

The asset space has grown tremendously

since the great financial crisis

19

00:01:12,470 --> 00:01:14,539

and now it's under heavy scrutiny.

20

00:01:14,690 --> 00:01:15,585

Well, I have on the.

21

00:01:15,885 --> 00:01:20,925

Perfect guests to tell us if the

concerns are warranted or not.

22

00:01:21,375 --> 00:01:25,215

But first, this episode is sponsored

by the award-winning Zephyr, which

23

00:01:25,215 --> 00:01:28,935

helps investment professionals

make more informed investment

24

00:01:28,935 --> 00:01:30,795

decisions on behalf of their clients.

25

00:01:31,065 --> 00:01:31,335

All right.

26

00:01:31,335 --> 00:01:32,085

Enough for me.

27

00:01:32,205 --> 00:01:33,585

I've already talked enough.

28

00:01:33,670 --> 00:01:35,860

Let's bring on the star of the show.

29

00:01:35,920 --> 00:01:38,050

I'd like to welcome Chris Getter.

30

00:01:38,500 --> 00:01:42,370

Chris is the managing director

and portfolio manager at

31

00:01:42,370 --> 00:01:44,320

Simplify Asset Management.

32

00:01:44,320 --> 00:01:46,570

Chris, thank you so much for coming on.

33

00:01:46,780 --> 00:01:48,070

It's an honor to have you.

34

00:01:48,070 --> 00:01:50,080

I'm really excited

about this conversation.

35

00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:52,240

Can you please tell us a little

bit more about yourself and

36

00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:54,009

simplify asset management?

37

00:01:54,310 --> 00:01:54,700

Sure.

38

00:01:54,705 --> 00:01:55,570

Thanks for having me on, Ryan.

39

00:01:55,570 --> 00:01:56,650

I'm excited to be here too.

40

00:01:57,340 --> 00:02:02,635

Um, so I joined Simplify about two

years ago and most of our focus.

41

00:02:03,590 --> 00:02:07,850

Is on bringing alternatives

into the ETF structure.

42

00:02:07,850 --> 00:02:12,800

So we are taking full advantage of some

of the regulatory changes that occurred

43

00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:17,720

just over five years ago, uh, specifically

with respect to deployment of leverage

44

00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:23,180

utilization of derivatives in ETFs to

make what would normally be strategies

45

00:02:23,180 --> 00:02:27,560

that are restricted to institutional

investors available to a broader

46

00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,140

audience in the liquid ETF structure.

47

00:02:31,445 --> 00:02:32,510

Uh, that's fantastic.

48

00:02:32,510 --> 00:02:36,980

Chris, I'm a big believer in

democratization of investments.

49

00:02:36,980 --> 00:02:42,589

Like why should these institutional level

strategies be only for institutions?

50

00:02:42,859 --> 00:02:44,720

Right, and especially alternatives.

51

00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:45,019

They can.

52

00:02:45,215 --> 00:02:48,485

It brings such good benefits

to a portfolio through

53

00:02:48,485 --> 00:02:53,435

diversification, you know, maybe

enhanced risk adjusted returns.

54

00:02:53,704 --> 00:02:57,125

So I'm glad that, especially

in the ETF wrapper where um,

55

00:02:57,485 --> 00:03:00,395

they're easier to access access.

56

00:03:00,545 --> 00:03:04,115

You also have that transparency and

everything that goes along with that ETF.

57

00:03:05,225 --> 00:03:08,765

And like I said, private credit,

it's come under huge scrutiny

58

00:03:08,975 --> 00:03:11,340

recently for, for obvious reasons.

59

00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:13,460

But Chris, how have we.

60

00:03:14,020 --> 00:03:19,060

Got to this point where people are

now concerned that this crisis, if

61

00:03:19,060 --> 00:03:22,390

you want to call it crisis, I don't

think it's a crisis yet, but could

62

00:03:22,390 --> 00:03:28,360

snowball into, you know, a major

crisis for the financial markets.

63

00:03:30,460 --> 00:03:35,440

So I, I, I'm not in the crisis

camp and I think what we have

64

00:03:35,440 --> 00:03:39,070

seen in private credit is.

65

00:03:39,785 --> 00:03:46,175

Maybe, maybe it's the tell, but a

lot of it is really more endemic

66

00:03:46,175 --> 00:03:49,835

to what's gone on in private credit

and how the asset class has evolved.

67

00:03:50,585 --> 00:03:54,845

So going back to the summer,

early fall of last year, you

68

00:03:54,845 --> 00:03:56,405

had some idiosyncratic events.

69

00:03:57,215 --> 00:04:02,375

Uh, first brands tricolor More

recently you've had MFS naturally

70

00:04:02,375 --> 00:04:05,345

leads people to wonder, you know,

are there, are there many, many

71

00:04:05,345 --> 00:04:06,845

more of these idiosyncratic events?

72

00:04:06,845 --> 00:04:07,625

That's number one.

73

00:04:07,820 --> 00:04:07,880

Yeah.

74

00:04:08,420 --> 00:04:14,420

Number two is the disruptive potential

of AI as it pertains to the tech

75

00:04:14,420 --> 00:04:19,670

sector where a lot of private sector

credit has been deployed much more

76

00:04:19,670 --> 00:04:21,050

so than in the high yield market.

77

00:04:21,500 --> 00:04:25,730

Technology in the high yield market

is, is somewhere between five and 10%.

78

00:04:25,730 --> 00:04:29,570

It tends to be skewed more

towards, uh, consumer sectors.

79

00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:34,490

And the third, more recently is the

impact of what's going on in Iran and

80

00:04:34,490 --> 00:04:37,265

how that might dent the uh, US economy.

81

00:04:38,135 --> 00:04:41,795

All of that has a gain weight,

um, against private credit.

82

00:04:42,665 --> 00:04:46,534

But more broadly, if we look at what's

gone on in the high yield market,

83

00:04:46,534 --> 00:04:50,675

we've been saying that high yield is

probably too tight for, you know, going

84

00:04:50,675 --> 00:04:56,405

on a year now, um, not only do some

of the, the economic variables that

85

00:04:56,405 --> 00:05:01,775

we look at suggest to us that high

yield had been stretched, but also the

86

00:05:01,775 --> 00:05:05,555

realized bank level of bankruptcies

among corporates has now risen.

87

00:05:05,975 --> 00:05:09,395

To about 50% above the

trailing 12 month average.

88

00:05:09,395 --> 00:05:14,105

So there's clearly some signs of stress

in the market against that, Ryan, and

89

00:05:14,105 --> 00:05:18,635

I'd weigh the fact that we've had a

significant repricing already, um, and

90

00:05:18,635 --> 00:05:22,745

probably more advanced in private credit

than it is in the high yield market.

91

00:05:22,745 --> 00:05:24,664

So high yield market spreads, bottomed.

92

00:05:25,130 --> 00:05:28,640

In January, there are about

70, 75 basis points wider.

93

00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:33,350

So far in private credit, you've had

discounts, widen discounts to book

94

00:05:33,350 --> 00:05:36,980

value, um, widen to north of 20%.

95

00:05:37,280 --> 00:05:39,590

So there's a lot of pain

priced into the market already.

96

00:05:40,669 --> 00:05:43,970

That's interesting that there is a

lot of pain because like you said,

97

00:05:44,510 --> 00:05:49,370

when I look at credit spreads, they're

pretty, they've gone up a little bit

98

00:05:49,370 --> 00:05:51,289

recently, but they're still very tight.

99

00:05:51,289 --> 00:05:51,650

It's like.

100

00:05:52,685 --> 00:05:55,835

I feel as if they should be wider

for the uncertainty that's out there.

101

00:05:56,284 --> 00:05:56,615

Right.

102

00:05:56,675 --> 00:06:02,435

But you're seeing that more, you know, pri

the private space is kind of indicating

103

00:06:02,435 --> 00:06:04,715

maybe there is some distress out there.

104

00:06:05,135 --> 00:06:05,825

I think so.

105

00:06:05,825 --> 00:06:08,235

Um, so our estimates, I.

106

00:06:09,765 --> 00:06:12,860

Okay, going back to wind spreads, were

at the tights, and you're right, they,

107

00:06:12,860 --> 00:06:17,300

they were upwards of the 90th percentile,

actually upwards of the 95th percentile

108

00:06:17,300 --> 00:06:19,280

of tightness relative to their history.

109

00:06:19,850 --> 00:06:23,270

Um, our assessment at the time

was that they were probably

110

00:06:23,270 --> 00:06:25,520

200 ish basis points too tight.

111

00:06:25,669 --> 00:06:26,900

This is in the US high yield market.

112

00:06:27,620 --> 00:06:32,060

You've had a roughly 80 basis point

widening so far, so they're still tight.

113

00:06:32,065 --> 00:06:32,414

Mm-hmm.

114

00:06:33,235 --> 00:06:35,810

So I, I definitely agree

with, with that sentiment.

115

00:06:36,350 --> 00:06:38,210

So do you think, and I think.

116

00:06:38,780 --> 00:06:41,630

You kind of already answered this

question, but do you think the

117

00:06:41,630 --> 00:06:44,990

concerns in private credit, that

issue, they're a little overdone,

118

00:06:45,289 --> 00:06:47,720

maybe we're a little too concerned and

119

00:06:50,659 --> 00:06:51,470

o overdone.

120

00:06:51,470 --> 00:06:54,590

I, I don't know if I'd say they're

overdone, they're warranted.

121

00:06:54,650 --> 00:06:59,060

This is a new asset class that people

have not the sort of familiarity with.

122

00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:04,310

I think people are coming to the

realization in some cases, um, that

123

00:07:04,340 --> 00:07:07,340

their capital is locked up, right?

124

00:07:07,340 --> 00:07:07,460

Like.

125

00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:12,919

It, it, it's not that this is a surprise

to people, it's a surprise that, you know,

126

00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:16,039

it's a surprise to them that they were

gonna want their money back that quickly.

127

00:07:16,430 --> 00:07:19,880

So I don't think it's a, it's nothing

endemic to the asset class, aside

128

00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:24,590

from, you know, people, people starting

to have a better appreciation for

129

00:07:24,980 --> 00:07:26,510

the way that these structures work.

130

00:07:26,510 --> 00:07:29,720

And the second thing is, there's

being a huge amount of dispersion.

131

00:07:30,350 --> 00:07:33,650

Like if you pick, you know, let's

just say you pick A, B, D, C to

132

00:07:33,650 --> 00:07:34,820

express your private credit view.

133

00:07:35,615 --> 00:07:39,125

Business development company that

lends to the, to the private sector.

134

00:07:39,784 --> 00:07:42,905

Um, you could have a very

good experience last year.

135

00:07:43,595 --> 00:07:46,085

You could have bought

somebody that was up 25%.

136

00:07:46,745 --> 00:07:49,235

You could have bought

somebody who was down 25%.

137

00:07:49,805 --> 00:07:55,595

So I think we need to separate

the asset allocation decision from

138

00:07:55,655 --> 00:07:57,365

the manager selection decision.

139

00:07:57,365 --> 00:08:00,515

And, and clearly if you pick

the manager who's down 25, who's

140

00:08:00,515 --> 00:08:02,680

gated you in, who's written down

assets and being in the paper.

141

00:08:03,380 --> 00:08:04,460

Probably ain't so happy.

142

00:08:05,090 --> 00:08:09,560

Yeah, I think that's perfect, Chris,

because my next thought was, you

143

00:08:09,560 --> 00:08:13,370

know, is this more of a systematic

issue where just, and you brought it

144

00:08:13,370 --> 00:08:18,350

up earlier, you know, tech, you know,

ai, it's gonna disrupt the tech space.

145

00:08:18,350 --> 00:08:23,810

And we've seen the software companies

that was recent, um, you know, that caused

146

00:08:23,810 --> 00:08:25,970

some distress within private credit.

147

00:08:27,140 --> 00:08:29,360

Part of me thinks, you

know, it's not systematic.

148

00:08:29,645 --> 00:08:35,284

It's more concentrated and then also, like

you said, there's a misalignment between

149

00:08:35,945 --> 00:08:38,255

the offering and who's investing in it.

150

00:08:38,585 --> 00:08:40,475

I think that's starting to show too.

151

00:08:40,475 --> 00:08:44,615

Do you think it's just more

concentrated to certain areas of private

152

00:08:44,615 --> 00:08:46,895

credit and not really systematic?

153

00:08:47,585 --> 00:08:48,815

Yeah, I don't think it's systematic.

154

00:08:48,815 --> 00:08:49,895

In fact, the, the one.

155

00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:53,270

I will answer an additional

question, which you, you haven't

156

00:08:53,270 --> 00:08:55,310

asked is, is how much is this?

157

00:08:55,310 --> 00:08:56,330

Like 2008?

158

00:08:56,660 --> 00:09:00,260

And that's where I really get frustrated

because the, you know, if you look

159

00:09:00,260 --> 00:09:03,890

at what the, the, if you wanna call

it, the threat from AI to some of

160

00:09:03,890 --> 00:09:08,150

these companies is, it's not that

they won't be going concerns anymore.

161

00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:09,630

They may be less profitable.

162

00:09:09,630 --> 00:09:12,000

We've already seen layoffs and,

and those have been happening for

163

00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:13,530

a year, oh, well over a year now.

164

00:09:14,100 --> 00:09:19,439

Um, it's that they might have not

have the sort of rentier level margins

165

00:09:19,439 --> 00:09:22,680

that they enjoyed in the past, but

it's probably not that they're going

166

00:09:22,680 --> 00:09:24,660

to cease to exist as a going concern.

167

00:09:24,660 --> 00:09:29,219

Contrast that with 2008, where you

had structures that were built on

168

00:09:29,219 --> 00:09:33,630

faulty assumptions, and when the

bottom started caving, it brought

169

00:09:33,630 --> 00:09:35,100

down the rest of the house of cards.

170

00:09:35,189 --> 00:09:37,469

I don't see a lot of similarity.

171

00:09:37,955 --> 00:09:40,175

To what's gone on in the

private credit market.

172

00:09:40,175 --> 00:09:44,405

But you know, again, that's not to

dismiss the fact that we are probably

173

00:09:44,405 --> 00:09:46,115

in the late stages of a credit cycle.

174

00:09:46,475 --> 00:09:47,585

Yeah, yeah.

175

00:09:48,185 --> 00:09:50,255

What does that, I'm glad

you brought that up.

176

00:09:50,285 --> 00:09:53,225

The, why does that impact it then?

177

00:09:53,225 --> 00:09:54,695

That late stage of the credit?

178

00:09:54,695 --> 00:09:56,465

Can you go into a little

bit more detail there?

179

00:09:56,765 --> 00:09:57,185

Yeah.

180

00:09:57,185 --> 00:10:02,195

I mean, in the same way that

many of us are behaviorally

181

00:10:02,195 --> 00:10:04,775

tempted to reach for returns.

182

00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:07,490

Credit managers do the same thing, right?

183

00:10:07,490 --> 00:10:08,900

I mean, spreads get tighter and tighter.

184

00:10:09,020 --> 00:10:12,140

I money's coming in, yeah, I

gotta put it to work somewhere.

185

00:10:12,740 --> 00:10:17,690

And so you start stretching for that

extra little bit of yield and that yield

186

00:10:17,690 --> 00:10:21,860

comes at progressively less compensation

for the risk that you're underwriting.

187

00:10:22,100 --> 00:10:24,830

That's late stage credit cycle behavior.

188

00:10:25,370 --> 00:10:26,030

Interesting.

189

00:10:26,180 --> 00:10:26,690

I love that.

190

00:10:26,690 --> 00:10:27,050

Thank you.

191

00:10:27,770 --> 00:10:29,540

Great, great insight there.

192

00:10:30,545 --> 00:10:34,895

So then I brought it up a little, you

know, that misalignment, you know, for

193

00:10:34,895 --> 00:10:39,965

the past year, even before that, it's like

private credit that, or just alternative.

194

00:10:39,995 --> 00:10:44,255

Private managers are really trying

so hard to get into the retail space.

195

00:10:44,405 --> 00:10:46,835

Private wealth, same time, private wealth.

196

00:10:47,405 --> 00:10:51,725

They really want to get in and bring

it, get exposure to private markets.

197

00:10:52,055 --> 00:10:53,585

Both want each other.

198

00:10:54,125 --> 00:10:54,335

Right?

199

00:10:54,425 --> 00:10:55,505

But do you think.

200

00:10:56,105 --> 00:11:00,755

Maybe we should have taken a step back

and like really thought about this because

201

00:11:01,325 --> 00:11:07,145

now all of a sudden those retail investors

at private wealth, like you said, they

202

00:11:07,145 --> 00:11:10,355

weren't in the investment very long

and now all of a sudden they want money

203

00:11:10,355 --> 00:11:13,115

out where they just misalignment there.

204

00:11:13,115 --> 00:11:17,255

They didn't really understand the

investment that they're getting into, and

205

00:11:17,255 --> 00:11:19,925

that's kind of the, the bigger issue here.

206

00:11:21,500 --> 00:11:22,610

It is possible.

207

00:11:22,790 --> 00:11:27,020

Um, you know, I, I certainly didn't

come on here to point fingers Ryan,

208

00:11:27,020 --> 00:11:31,310

but I, I do think that, uh, do it,

there, there is a little bit of shiny

209

00:11:31,310 --> 00:11:36,380

new toy and, you know, you, you either

somewhere between shiny new toy and

210

00:11:36,380 --> 00:11:40,850

fomo, oh, you know, my buddy, his

advisor or put him into private credit.

211

00:11:41,450 --> 00:11:44,510

Um, and there may be some, you know.

212

00:11:45,440 --> 00:11:47,960

There may be some excitement

around it that isn't matched by

213

00:11:47,960 --> 00:11:51,020

the due diligence that's gone into

considering whether it's a fit.

214

00:11:51,590 --> 00:11:56,750

I mean, uh, there are plenty of

institutions who can underwrite the

215

00:11:57,140 --> 00:12:02,780

illiquidity, the hidden volatility,

the ability to put capital to

216

00:12:02,780 --> 00:12:04,580

work on a called basis, right?

217

00:12:04,580 --> 00:12:06,710

You're committing to if, if

you're an institutional investor,

218

00:12:07,160 --> 00:12:08,005

you commit to put capital.

219

00:12:08,645 --> 00:12:12,035

To work when the private

credit sponsor asks for it.

220

00:12:12,515 --> 00:12:15,815

That's not really easy for

an individual investor to do.

221

00:12:16,235 --> 00:12:21,305

And I think some of what we've seen,

the enthusiasm to get into it perhaps

222

00:12:21,305 --> 00:12:22,745

wasn't paired with enough due diligence.

223

00:12:22,745 --> 00:12:23,975

Yes, it's a great product.

224

00:12:23,975 --> 00:12:28,805

I often say it's a great product

for the right portfolio, but at

225

00:12:28,805 --> 00:12:32,375

the same time, it can be a terrible

product for the wrong portfolio.

226

00:12:32,405 --> 00:12:32,555

Mm-hmm.

227

00:12:33,155 --> 00:12:36,485

And if you don't understand that, and

the financial advisor job is really hard.

228

00:12:37,310 --> 00:12:41,420

All the new products out there and

the demands on them, you know, but,

229

00:12:41,540 --> 00:12:45,770

you know, continue to educate, make

sure that those product aligns with

230

00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:48,260

what, uh, what the investor needs.

231

00:12:48,680 --> 00:12:51,710

Why, let's compare it to public credit.

232

00:12:52,819 --> 00:12:55,880

Why is private credit a good

alternative for public credit?

233

00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:57,680

And let's assume it's

for the right investor.

234

00:12:57,685 --> 00:12:57,855

Mm-hmm.

235

00:12:58,100 --> 00:13:03,230

Why is it a good alternative to your

traditional ag or public credit?

236

00:13:04,010 --> 00:13:06,140

So there's, there's a couple

of things it offers you.

237

00:13:06,215 --> 00:13:06,275

Yeah.

238

00:13:06,845 --> 00:13:14,765

Um, one of which is the private nature of

it doesn't have as much public scrutiny.

239

00:13:14,825 --> 00:13:15,515

That's number one.

240

00:13:15,905 --> 00:13:18,815

Number two, floating rate issuance.

241

00:13:19,685 --> 00:13:22,865

So if, if you say, I, I really

like credit, but I'm a little bit

242

00:13:22,865 --> 00:13:25,535

concerned about interest rates

going up, private credit might

243

00:13:25,535 --> 00:13:26,825

be a good fit for your portfolio.

244

00:13:26,825 --> 00:13:28,805

You can immunize some of

that interest rate risk.

245

00:13:29,885 --> 00:13:35,255

Um, the, the what those net out to

over time has historically been.

246

00:13:36,050 --> 00:13:40,310

A higher return than investment

grade or high yield credit,

247

00:13:40,760 --> 00:13:41,870

we say, okay, that's great.

248

00:13:41,870 --> 00:13:41,960

Mm-hmm.

249

00:13:42,590 --> 00:13:46,550

Um, and the other thing that, that,

which I do believe, uh, investors

250

00:13:46,550 --> 00:13:52,010

have been sold a bill of goods on, is

the lack of volatility where the high

251

00:13:52,010 --> 00:13:53,990

yield market has undergone stress.

252

00:13:54,590 --> 00:13:56,450

Private credit has really

taken it on the chin.

253

00:13:56,450 --> 00:13:59,240

We don't have decades worth of history

here the way we do in some others.

254

00:13:59,240 --> 00:14:00,375

But if you go back to 2020.

255

00:14:01,460 --> 00:14:06,290

Um, I think the high yield market was off

mid-teens, private credit was off 38%.

256

00:14:07,310 --> 00:14:07,610

Okay.

257

00:14:07,610 --> 00:14:12,230

So you have this, what people perceive

to be a lack of volatility until

258

00:14:12,230 --> 00:14:15,380

you have a massive rapid drawdown.

259

00:14:15,920 --> 00:14:20,150

That's the trade off of getting

these higher returns and, and,

260

00:14:20,150 --> 00:14:21,320

and the less interest rate risk.

261

00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:24,530

So it's, it's every bit is vol

and actually measured volatility

262

00:14:24,530 --> 00:14:25,940

in private credit, much higher.

263

00:14:26,405 --> 00:14:28,385

Than any other form of public credit.

264

00:14:28,685 --> 00:14:30,635

But that's the draw is more return.

265

00:14:31,145 --> 00:14:31,415

Yeah.

266

00:14:31,415 --> 00:14:34,175

Well, there's no free lunches, Chris.

267

00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:37,265

I, I think I learned

that early in my career.

268

00:14:37,385 --> 00:14:42,785

No free lunches unless you can't just

have higher return without a drawback.

269

00:14:43,055 --> 00:14:43,445

Right.

270

00:14:44,225 --> 00:14:48,755

And Chris, if you tell me I can

get 10% return with no risk,

271

00:14:48,755 --> 00:14:50,555

I would be a little concerned.

272

00:14:51,125 --> 00:14:53,825

It'd be a little, I might, uh,

be like, uh, Chris, what are

273

00:14:53,825 --> 00:14:54,845

you trying to cellmate here?

274

00:14:55,235 --> 00:14:55,325

Yeah.

275

00:14:55,330 --> 00:14:55,480

Um.

276

00:14:56,570 --> 00:15:01,280

So with that being said, are there

some other strategies out there?

277

00:15:01,280 --> 00:15:01,490

Yes.

278

00:15:01,490 --> 00:15:04,880

Private credit, you brought

out the benefits and, and what

279

00:15:04,880 --> 00:15:06,500

it can bring to a portfolio.

280

00:15:07,040 --> 00:15:11,750

Are there other strategies that might

provide some similar benefits that

281

00:15:11,750 --> 00:15:16,700

private credit without that risk,

maybe without that volatility such as

282

00:15:16,850 --> 00:15:22,970

liquidity risk that maybe investors

can, um, invest in that like said

283

00:15:22,970 --> 00:15:24,590

doesn't have the liquidity risk.

284

00:15:26,240 --> 00:15:31,400

So in terms of the, within the

alternatives bucket, and I'm, I'm a

285

00:15:31,400 --> 00:15:35,959

big fan of, of ensuring that I use the

plural alternatives, not alternative.

286

00:15:36,590 --> 00:15:42,199

Because as, as an, as advisors go

from traditional 60 40 to, you know,

287

00:15:42,199 --> 00:15:49,400

55, 35, 10, you know, 50, 30, 20, um,

you, you, you, you gotta have, it's

288

00:15:49,400 --> 00:15:54,800

inexcusable to not have multiple assets

within that alternatives component and.

289

00:15:55,175 --> 00:15:58,535

While, while I do think private credit

fits in there, I think there are plenty

290

00:15:58,535 --> 00:16:04,595

of other liquidy accessible, perhaps even

more pedestrian things that go in there.

291

00:16:04,595 --> 00:16:06,215

Like a managed future strategy.

292

00:16:06,245 --> 00:16:07,085

That's a good fit.

293

00:16:07,085 --> 00:16:07,295

Right?

294

00:16:07,295 --> 00:16:11,375

It doesn't, I mean, just even setting

aside what we are doing at simplify,

295

00:16:11,675 --> 00:16:17,105

managed futures generally exhibit low

correlation with stocks and bonds.

296

00:16:17,105 --> 00:16:18,635

They're zigging when you're.

297

00:16:19,025 --> 00:16:23,255

You know, 60 40 zagging,

um, currency strategies.

298

00:16:23,285 --> 00:16:26,555

We've recently been pushed into

the currency space with a strategy

299

00:16:26,555 --> 00:16:30,005

that is, is done phenomenally

well, all systematically managed.

300

00:16:30,425 --> 00:16:38,165

Um, not only has it produced fantastic

absolute returns, it's diversified,

301

00:16:38,165 --> 00:16:42,665

the very low correlations, almost

actually negative correlations between

302

00:16:42,905 --> 00:16:45,035

stocks and with stocks and bonds.

303

00:16:45,425 --> 00:16:48,155

And critically it is.

304

00:16:48,215 --> 00:16:51,845

Uh, lowly correlated

with other alternatives.

305

00:16:52,055 --> 00:16:54,335

So that's kind of what

you want in a portfolio.

306

00:16:54,335 --> 00:16:58,745

Like things, things that have a

positive return but don't behave

307

00:16:58,745 --> 00:16:59,855

like other stuff in the portfolio.

308

00:16:59,885 --> 00:17:01,475

That's a very valuable property.

309

00:17:01,805 --> 00:17:04,625

So I think those are in,

again, both of those things.

310

00:17:05,135 --> 00:17:06,035

Very liquid.

311

00:17:06,214 --> 00:17:07,685

Um, easy to access.

312

00:17:07,730 --> 00:17:09,920

Yeah, I love those examples.

313

00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:11,660

I think they're great.

314

00:17:11,750 --> 00:17:15,348

Um, alternative, I wouldn't even say

alternatives to private credit, but

315

00:17:15,348 --> 00:17:19,339

just something else to consider for that

alternative sleeve that you talked about

316

00:17:19,339 --> 00:17:24,890

that provides liquidity, which you know,

is very important to a lot of people.

317

00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:25,579

Yeah.

318

00:17:25,700 --> 00:17:27,319

One more, I might, I'm

sorry to interrupt you.

319

00:17:27,319 --> 00:17:27,950

No, go ahead, Ryan.

320

00:17:27,980 --> 00:17:31,790

Um, one more that I might add, like

if, if you like, if you like credit.

321

00:17:31,790 --> 00:17:34,820

Um, and you think private

credit is maybe not the space

322

00:17:34,820 --> 00:17:35,690

for you, for whatever reason.

323

00:17:35,690 --> 00:17:41,450

Portfolio fit, valuation, concern,

fundamentals, um, like get into

324

00:17:41,450 --> 00:17:43,310

high yield, but with a credit hedge.

325

00:17:43,310 --> 00:17:46,399

I mean, we do this, um, one of

our portfolio, our, our high yield

326

00:17:46,399 --> 00:17:53,720

portfolio is built with benchmark,

like high yield exposure, but then

327

00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:55,370

we put a credit hedge on top of that.

328

00:17:55,370 --> 00:17:57,800

So if you, if you think I'm gonna

wanna be in this at some point,

329

00:17:58,010 --> 00:17:59,060

don't bother market timing it.

330

00:17:59,435 --> 00:18:01,385

Yeah, that's hard to do.

331

00:18:01,655 --> 00:18:05,435

Um, you know, but if you get into

something where you have a structural

332

00:18:05,524 --> 00:18:10,985

page that should cushion the exposure

in the event of a drawdown and adds to

333

00:18:10,985 --> 00:18:12,635

your return over the course of time.

334

00:18:12,635 --> 00:18:14,825

'cause it's not a direct

page, it's an indirect page.

335

00:18:14,825 --> 00:18:15,635

Mm-hmm.

336

00:18:15,636 --> 00:18:17,225

Um, that should be very valuable as well.

337

00:18:17,585 --> 00:18:17,825

Yeah.

338

00:18:17,915 --> 00:18:18,575

Fantastic.

339

00:18:18,575 --> 00:18:19,205

Chris.

340

00:18:19,294 --> 00:18:24,544

Lastly, whether it is through

managed futures or private credit

341

00:18:24,544 --> 00:18:26,585

or you know, some currency product.

342

00:18:27,155 --> 00:18:30,185

What should be the primary

considerations that financial

343

00:18:30,185 --> 00:18:33,965

advisors should consider when, you

know, incorporating these products?

344

00:18:33,965 --> 00:18:37,895

Obviously alignment, but is there anything

else that they should think about?

345

00:18:38,645 --> 00:18:41,345

And it really could be any alternative.

346

00:18:41,375 --> 00:18:45,095

I mean, there's so many different

alternatives out there, but Yeah.

347

00:18:45,095 --> 00:18:50,075

Uh, to me it's, um, peel, peel

back the label, like the, you know,

348

00:18:50,075 --> 00:18:52,145

label does not equate to risk.

349

00:18:52,280 --> 00:18:52,340

Hmm.

350

00:18:53,149 --> 00:18:57,260

Uh, understand what risks you

are underwriting and make sure

351

00:18:57,260 --> 00:18:58,490

that those are intentional.

352

00:18:58,550 --> 00:19:04,340

For example, um, you know,

this is a silly one, but we use

353

00:19:04,340 --> 00:19:05,629

a lot of total return swaps.

354

00:19:05,629 --> 00:19:07,580

We tend to be derivatives intensive.

355

00:19:08,120 --> 00:19:11,629

Um, a total return swap

entails some counterparty risk.

356

00:19:12,110 --> 00:19:13,790

Like it's a little foolish.

357

00:19:13,790 --> 00:19:17,090

It's quite rich of me to ask

my investors to get paid for

358

00:19:17,090 --> 00:19:18,290

underwriting counterparty risk.

359

00:19:18,290 --> 00:19:19,580

Like we should have that part down pat.

360

00:19:20,149 --> 00:19:20,270

Mm-hmm.

361

00:19:20,510 --> 00:19:21,860

So understand what.

362

00:19:22,175 --> 00:19:24,095

What exposures you're getting.

363

00:19:24,425 --> 00:19:28,625

Make sure you're getting paid for them

and that's before, you know, that's either

364

00:19:28,625 --> 00:19:30,425

before or after you get to the issues.

365

00:19:30,425 --> 00:19:32,255

You mentioned a fit within a portfolio.

366

00:19:32,645 --> 00:19:32,825

Yeah.

367

00:19:33,905 --> 00:19:35,765

Chris, fantastic.

368

00:19:36,185 --> 00:19:37,505

Love the conversation.

369

00:19:37,535 --> 00:19:40,325

Really timely, important conversation too.

370

00:19:40,325 --> 00:19:45,935

Like I, I agree that yes, there's some

issues out there and some of the, it

371

00:19:45,935 --> 00:19:47,595

is warranted with private credit, but.

372

00:19:48,274 --> 00:19:50,135

Is it a full blown on crisis?

373

00:19:50,135 --> 00:19:50,855

Probably not.

374

00:19:51,034 --> 00:19:54,065

Like the headlines say,

um, pick and choose.

375

00:19:54,125 --> 00:19:55,595

You gotta do your due diligence.

376

00:19:55,774 --> 00:19:59,165

Like maybe more, do more due

diligence now than before.

377

00:19:59,195 --> 00:20:01,865

But, um, fantastic conversation.

378

00:20:02,045 --> 00:20:02,764

Thank you so much.

379

00:20:02,764 --> 00:20:03,905

Such an honor to have your own.

380

00:20:03,965 --> 00:20:06,365

Where can our audience

get more information about

381

00:20:06,365 --> 00:20:08,135

simplify asset management?

382

00:20:08,225 --> 00:20:12,840

You can visit our website,

uh, www dot simplify us.

383

00:20:13,669 --> 00:20:15,409

Uh, please don't hesitate to reach out.

384

00:20:15,409 --> 00:20:17,060

There's an email, there's

a phone number on there.

385

00:20:17,060 --> 00:20:18,189

We'd be delighted to hear from you.

386

00:20:18,875 --> 00:20:19,324

Awesome.

387

00:20:19,445 --> 00:20:23,044

Thank you Chris, and thank you everyone

for listening to this episode of

388

00:20:23,044 --> 00:20:25,235

zephyr's Adjusted for Risk podcast.

389

00:20:25,534 --> 00:20:28,594

You can watch all of our other

episodes on the Zephyr YouTube channel.

390

00:20:28,774 --> 00:20:29,554

Spotify.

391

00:20:29,584 --> 00:20:32,615

Please be sure to like, subscribe

and give us a follow on LinkedIn.

392

00:20:33,004 --> 00:20:35,375

Thank you very much and have

a great rest of your week.

393

00:20:35,735 --> 00:20:36,155

Thanks everyone.

394

00:20:36,155 --> 00:20:36,905

Let's get started.