Shownotes
Oral Argument Re-Listen: Case v. Montana | Case No. 24-624 | Oral Argument Date: 10/15/25
Link to Docket: Here
Case Preview: Here
Question Presented: Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.
Oral Advocates:
- For Petitioner: Fred A. Rowley, Jr., Los Angeles
- For Respondent: Christian B. Corrigan, Solicitor General, Montana
- United States as Amicus Curiae: Zoe A. Jacoby, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice
Holding: Brigham City’s objective reasonableness standard for warrantless home entries to render emergency aid applies without further gloss and was satisfied in this case.
Result: Affirmed.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Kagan delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch filed concurring opinions.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Timestamps:
[00:00:00] Episode Preview
[00:00:50] Argument Begins
[00:01:02] Petitioner Opening Statement
[00:03:12] Petitioner Free for All Questions
[00:27:25] Petitioner Sequential Questions
[00:39:50] Respondent Opening Statement
[00:41:41] Respondent Free for All Questions
[00:55:44] Respondent Sequential Questions
[01:00:52] United States as Amicus Curaie Opening Statement
[01:02:01] United States as Amicus Curaie Free for All Questions
[01:09:15] United States as Amicus Curaie Sequential Questions
[01:10:40] Petitioner Rebuttal