Artwork for podcast The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
Episode 316 - NSW + 1 Hour but - 40 years
12th October 2021 • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove • The Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove
00:00:00 02:00:53

Share Episode

Shownotes

Topics:

  • NSW Leadership Thoughts
  • Gladys Excused and ICAC Vilified
  • Federal ICAC
  • New leader Dominic Perrottet
  • From Crikey
  • From The Spectator
  • Is Religious Belief Relevant?
  • The Perfect Example- Perrottet and Cemeteries
  • Perrotte’s Neo-Liberalism is the biggest worry
  • NSW VAD Update
  • Dan Andrews is The Man
  • Banknote artwork
  • Goodbye Facebook
  • 'Missing' man joins search party looking for himself
  • Jessica Rowe and Pauline Hanson
  • Uproar as all-boys netball team beats girls to win state title
  • Understanding Class in Australia
  • Larrikins, bogans and bullshit artists
  • Blue-collar blokes are deserting the left. The future is female
  • Climate Change Acceptance
  • Energy
  • Keith Pitt wants to lend Coal Companies $250 billion
  • Nuclear by Newspoll
  • Nuclear by Essential Report
  • Nuclear by The Spectator
  • Nuclear by Bob Carr

To financially support the Podcast you can make:

We Livestream every Monday night at 7:30 pm Brisbane time. Follow us on Facebook or YouTube. Watch us live and join the discussion in the chat room.

We have a website. www.ironfistvelvetglove.com.au

You can email us. The address is trevor@ironfistvelvetglove.com.au



Transcripts

Speaker:

Suburban Eastern Australia, an environment that has, over time,

Speaker:

evolved some extraordinarily unique groups of homosapiens.

Speaker:

Despite the reputation of their homeland, some are remarkably thin

Speaker:

skinned, some seem to have multiple lifespans, a few were once thought to be

Speaker:

extinct in the region, others have been observed being sacrificed by their own.

Speaker:

But today We observe a small tribe akin to a group of meerkats that gather together

Speaker:

atop a small mound to watch, question, and discuss the current events of their city,

Speaker:

their country, and their world at large.

Speaker:

Let's listen keenly and observe this group fondly known as the

Speaker:

Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove.

Speaker:

Hello dear listener, this is the Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove podcast.

Speaker:

Where we talk about news and politics and sex and religion.

Speaker:

It's been a couple of weeks since we last spoke to you.

Speaker:

So we've got a few things to talk about, a few things have happened.

Speaker:

And, uh, well, we'll get right into it after the introductions with me.

Speaker:

Nearly as always, when she's not swanning around in Western Australia

Speaker:

on some junket of some sort.

Speaker:

On the Swan River.

Speaker:

Yes, swanning around on the Swan River.

Speaker:

Shay, the subversive, how are you, Shay?

Speaker:

Good evening, I'm very well, thanks for having me.

Speaker:

And Joe, the tech guy.

Speaker:

Evening all.

Speaker:

So Shay, wonderful time in Western Australia, sampled some wines, did you?

Speaker:

Yeah, that's what I'd planned.

Speaker:

I'd planned to go to the AFL Grand Final or at least the bar afterwards,

Speaker:

but unfortunately police had other ideas, so I got quarantined for 14 days.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, anyway, Qantas sent you there to work and then it turns out you couldn't work

Speaker:

and you spent the two weeks studying.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

Cooped up.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

So, anyway, it's just going to take a bit longer to keep everyone safe and get

Speaker:

this border stuff sorted and yeah, then we'll have people moving around again.

Speaker:

Well, I guess it wouldn't have been entirely surprising.

Speaker:

You would have not have counted your chickens until you

Speaker:

actually got to the airport.

Speaker:

Absolutely.

Speaker:

The whole time I was just like, There's no way they're going to let me in.

Speaker:

There's no way.

Speaker:

That proved to be the case.

Speaker:

In fact, they let you in.

Speaker:

In fact, I almost, I was like over the moon, yeah.

Speaker:

So the police said, yeah, come on in.

Speaker:

Yep, just get tested day 11.

Speaker:

And then, um, yeah, missed a phone call from them to say, actually no.

Speaker:

You didn't get past the luggage carousel.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

They started phoning you.

Speaker:

I might have made it, but I was in my uniform and I was changing

Speaker:

in the bathroom to go to the pub.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So if I'd left the airport in my uniform, I might have made an escape, but no.

Speaker:

So anyway, no pub, no adventures.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Sat in a room.

Speaker:

Very good.

Speaker:

Well, you're refreshed.

Speaker:

Now last week, didn't do a podcast.

Speaker:

I just, I'm going to do a book review and I just didn't, it's a really

Speaker:

important book and I didn't feel that I'd studied it enough and was able to give

Speaker:

it a good enough sort of explanation.

Speaker:

So Less is More by Jason Hickel.

Speaker:

That will be next week.

Speaker:

And it's very interesting because, uh, it gives a nice little history of capitalism.

Speaker:

Basically, when we're looking at renewables and the climate change, he's

Speaker:

really saying, um, we've got an obsession with growth in the West and that Even if

Speaker:

we get all these things sorted the just continual growth that capitalism demands

Speaker:

means that jobs and growth Well, yes that we're gonna have problems so it gives

Speaker:

a really interesting explanation of how capitalism is addicted to growth and that

Speaker:

if we continue to just grow then We'll still have problems with our climate etc.

Speaker:

So that will be next week.

Speaker:

Hello in the chat room Dire Straits and Brommen Uh, Brollman,

Speaker:

you're still in quarantine.

Speaker:

Fingers crossed not too much longer, so.

Speaker:

Um, also, uh, in other news, so you might remember last year we had our,

Speaker:

our Black Mass for the Noosa Temple of Satan, which was held at the J,

Speaker:

uh, Noosa sort of community hall.

Speaker:

And, tried to rebook it this year, and they said no, because of the

Speaker:

abuse that we receive from Christians.

Speaker:

From loving Christians.

Speaker:

They called our staff all sorts of names and threatened them with all sorts of

Speaker:

things, so because of their actions We're not allowing you to book the room again.

Speaker:

So, the only response to that is to protest in the streets.

Speaker:

So, the plan is that we will be getting a permit for a street march, where we will

Speaker:

be marching up and down Hastings Street.

Speaker:

Uh, Saturday night, the 30th of October, and people will be dressed up.

Speaker:

Not just a street march, it's a Halloween celebration.

Speaker:

Well, it's a protest about what's happened, and we'll incorporate

Speaker:

parts of the Black Mass ceremony as part of a protest, and then we'll

Speaker:

all de camp to a pub afterwards, so that will be interesting.

Speaker:

If you're in the Noosa area at all, uh, Saturday the 30th,

Speaker:

it will be quite an event.

Speaker:

I'll be there.

Speaker:

Got my outfit worked out.

Speaker:

Can't tell you what it is, but it's pretty good.

Speaker:

I think it's going to be pretty good.

Speaker:

Alright, so, um, so there we go.

Speaker:

Uh, alright, well, what's happened around Australia?

Speaker:

Of course we had the whole, uh, Gladys Berejiklian with her sudden resignation

Speaker:

and basically following the New South Wales ICAC coming out and saying,

Speaker:

Hmm, all that stuff that was going on with her and her ex boyfriend.

Speaker:

Worthy of further investigation.

Speaker:

And so she resigned as, um, premier and said, I'm out of it

Speaker:

and completely not even going to hang around and wait and see.

Speaker:

So I'm out of here.

Speaker:

And really the reaction to that was very measured.

Speaker:

The reaction by, by journalists, some journalists, by the

Speaker:

community, I can't really.

Speaker:

Worrying, depressing.

Speaker:

It's kind of part of the reason why I didn't even do a podcast last week.

Speaker:

I found it all quite depressing actually.

Speaker:

Because here was somebody who was being, uh, investigated for corruption.

Speaker:

And with some evidence there that deemed it worthy.

Speaker:

And the sympathy that she got from different sectors.

Speaker:

Was quite astounding, I thought, and you really had to say to these people, hang

Speaker:

on a minute She is the one who is being investigated for corruption and it's her

Speaker:

decision to reside and not hang around and So the shovel had put out a piece of the

Speaker:

puzzle Almost immediately saying, looking forward to Andrew Boltz, you can't even

Speaker:

be corrupt anymore, think peace, tomorrow.

Speaker:

And then they did one subsequently saying, well it wasn't just Andrew

Speaker:

Boltz, but it was basically half the journalists in Australia, and he's right.

Speaker:

So, of course, the Murdoch papers excused Gladys.

Speaker:

And, I guess, no surprise.

Speaker:

I guess.

Speaker:

Um, a typical example was Janet, Paul Brookson, in The Australian,

Speaker:

who said, Other leaders stand small in Berejiklian shadow.

Speaker:

Gladys Berejiklian can leave with her head held high, knowing she

Speaker:

led not just New South Wales, but the country, into a pandemic.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

The gaslighting.

Speaker:

That these people shamelessly do to try and say that New South Wales, even now,

Speaker:

this perite, is saying, well, we're showing Australia, we're leading the

Speaker:

rest of Australia out of the wilderness.

Speaker:

Guys, we, we haven't been in lockdown in Queensland or Western Australia.

Speaker:

People are going to the pubs, enjoying themselves.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

It's you guys who actually screwed it up more than anybody.

Speaker:

And you want to gaslight us and paint this picture?

Speaker:

Well, no, no, so New South Wales didn't go into a lockdown until six

Speaker:

months after the virus had escaped.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

It was a stay at home order.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

Remember?

Speaker:

Oh, yeah, that's right, yes.

Speaker:

She couldn't even say the words.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

So, you know, shortly after her resignation, maybe it was the

Speaker:

next day, was the Sunday Mail.

Speaker:

Um, and the, the front page of the headline, of the Sunday Mail, was bagging.

Speaker:

Anastasia Palisade, um, saying something about, um, her handling of the pandemic.

Speaker:

And then a few pages in was an article by Peter Credlin, opinion piece, saying

Speaker:

the wrong leader lost their job and saying it should have been Dan Andrews.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

It bears no relationship to the facts and they're just completely shameless.

Speaker:

Um, uh, so another example was, um, from Shari Markson, who said, Lynch

Speaker:

Mob takes down yet another leader.

Speaker:

ICAC has left NSW rudderless and has robbed the people of a popular Premier

Speaker:

at a time of crisis and uncertainty.

Speaker:

A lore unto themselves, ICAC is addicted to the power and publicity

Speaker:

of the bombshell political scalp.

Speaker:

Yeah, they've got a few scalps over the years but that's because over

Speaker:

the years people have been corrupt.

Speaker:

Even Berejiklian was saying Words to the effect, I was very rude

Speaker:

of them to do this at this time.

Speaker:

Like, couldn't they have waited?

Speaker:

To what?

Speaker:

Because this is such an important time for New South Wales.

Speaker:

Well, it's kind of like the Trump impeachment.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

They couldn't impeach him whilst he was in power because, you know,

Speaker:

he was a busy run of the country.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

And after he had left power, they wouldn't have been able to impeach him

Speaker:

because he was no longer president.

Speaker:

Yes, exactly.

Speaker:

But even, um, My wife's got a couple of friends who shall remain nameless.

Speaker:

Educated women, and they were like really sympathetic to Glaris

Speaker:

Berejiklian, one even put a coat on her front fence in support.

Speaker:

Wow.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's what people were doing, was putting a coat on their front fence.

Speaker:

Do they live in New South Wales?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

They live here?

Speaker:

Yes, one of them does, yes.

Speaker:

And they're very sympathetic to her.

Speaker:

And another woman brought low by a dastardly man.

Speaker:

Well, is there a bit of this sisterly sympathy?

Speaker:

Yes, there is.

Speaker:

Where they have not Looked at this rationally and coldly and and calmly and

Speaker:

have applied a different standard to a sister Is is that what's happening here?

Speaker:

It's it's not so much She is being held accountable for her these allegations.

Speaker:

It's that so many men aren't right So that might be where the sympathy is stems from

Speaker:

Where she's actually been, you know, has to resign, doesn't have to resign, but

Speaker:

chose to resign, chose to, you know, face the consequences more or less, depending

Speaker:

on how you, that's just how it was framed.

Speaker:

Certainly, but even as I'm saying it, I'm like, well, I

Speaker:

don't know, this is balanced.

Speaker:

I can hear my own bias, but I can't help it.

Speaker:

But in New South Wales, they've caught men and men have resigned.

Speaker:

Like, who's the guy with the wine bottle?

Speaker:

I can't even remember his name, but there's different.

Speaker:

Basically men.

Speaker:

She's probably the first woman.

Speaker:

I don't know the exact history of New South Wales corrupt and corrupt politics.

Speaker:

So, but there's certainly been enough men that it's not a

Speaker:

picking on women issue here.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

In ICAC's, um, what they've done.

Speaker:

So, I mean, ICAC's not perfect and there have been cases where some

Speaker:

people have been investigated by ICAC and had their, subsequently, so

Speaker:

all ICAC And then they'd recommend that the police should prosecute.

Speaker:

So there's been some people who've been investigated and then

Speaker:

a recommendation that they be prosecuted and then the re and the

Speaker:

prosecutions failed quite miserably.

Speaker:

And, um, that.

Speaker:

There's going to be no perfect system.

Speaker:

There, that's a pretty good segue though, because as part of my white

Speaker:

collar crime and corruption unit, I came across this reading that was,

Speaker:

uh, it's 2016, but here are some good suggestions to kind of hone and finesse.

Speaker:

ICAC.

Speaker:

So, one of them is, uh, the Commonwealth should appoint, this is for federal

Speaker:

level, but they could be applied anywhere, the Commonwealth should appoint an

Speaker:

independent parliamentary ethics officer.

Speaker:

The Commonwealth should appoint an An ethics officer, so somebody you can

Speaker:

go to, to talk in confidence about certain situations or particular

Speaker:

potential conflicts of interest.

Speaker:

Instead of an ICAC?

Speaker:

No, as well as.

Speaker:

So imagine Gladys has found herself in love, right?

Speaker:

She's also looking at, seriously looking at giving Wagga Wagga five million

Speaker:

dollars for Whatever the camp was, and she actually has somewhere to go to hash

Speaker:

this out where it won't be used against her later, and she can actually discuss

Speaker:

the ethics and what she should do, and the ethics guy or girl might say, you

Speaker:

should disclose that straight away, and you should absolutely step away from this.

Speaker:

That makes sense.

Speaker:

That makes sense, right?

Speaker:

So if you actually are serious about the injustice Gladys has faced, then these

Speaker:

are the types of things you put in place.

Speaker:

You have structures because what we're finding is that politicians

Speaker:

aren't necessarily exemplary humans.

Speaker:

They are just humans.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So the other suggestions were a handbook for not just public servants,

Speaker:

but for the general public, which I think would be important too.

Speaker:

Because I think that part of all of this media stuff is they're

Speaker:

actually mirroring public sentiment, which they're seeing on Twitter.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Right?

Speaker:

And that's partly because a lot of the general public aren't paying a high

Speaker:

level of interest into the goings on.

Speaker:

So then they're all shocked and surprised that Gladys has to go.

Speaker:

Do you know what I mean?

Speaker:

Some training.

Speaker:

I like this.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And then finally, All of the existing major integrity institutions

Speaker:

must be given budgetary security.

Speaker:

So you know how we discussed that, uh, Gladys started taking

Speaker:

the funding ah, from icac?

Speaker:

Yes, yes.

Speaker:

So, um, we've used the example here of defunding, defunding of the

Speaker:

office of the Australian Information Commissioner after the Senate refused

Speaker:

to pass legislation abolishing it.

Speaker:

So they just cut the funding instead of pass legislation.

Speaker:

So what we should put in place is they're given budgetary security

Speaker:

and only the appropriations can be adjusted by parliament.

Speaker:

So it'd be three structures we could put in place to make the system fairer.

Speaker:

Yes, that's good.

Speaker:

So that was, that came out of your course as a, as what,

Speaker:

who came up with these ideas?

Speaker:

I'd say, um, The Mandarin's free daily newsletter.

Speaker:

I'm a bit concerned of the source, but.

Speaker:

Now I like the idea of training and I like the idea of somebody you can go to.

Speaker:

Like, for example, with the law society, they said, you know, if

Speaker:

you have an ethical issue, we have someone you can talk to and, um,

Speaker:

just bounce an idea off or whatever, and it won't be held against you.

Speaker:

A little bit like the seal of the confessional operating in this case.

Speaker:

Like.

Speaker:

You know, you can confide in somebody and say, um, I better not say this in

Speaker:

the Sydney Morning Herald, but Yes, yes.

Speaker:

I can remember one.

Speaker:

They gave an example of this solicitor who was about to enter into a romantic

Speaker:

relationship with a client, and he was seeking Advice and and they joked

Speaker:

that by the tone and and urgency in his voice It seemed like it was a very

Speaker:

urgent response that he was requiring

Speaker:

He was on a promise

Speaker:

That's right Yes, that makes sense.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah, so I I like that.

Speaker:

Um, let's see if they take it up.

Speaker:

So the comparisons though with um Berjiklian and Scott Morrison

Speaker:

is we don't have a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

Yes You know why we don't.

Speaker:

Yes, because they don't want to pass it.

Speaker:

They're scared of what they'll find.

Speaker:

Well, well, according to this tweet from Aaron Dodd, it was because

Speaker:

Scott Morrison, um, He said, you know, I talked to Jenny about this.

Speaker:

She has a way of really clarifying things and she said, Why would

Speaker:

you create a federal ICAC?

Speaker:

I don't want to be a prison wife.

Speaker:

So that might be why, you know, against Jen's recommendation.

Speaker:

So even someone like Tanya Plibersek said, Thanks, Gladys,

Speaker:

for your hard work managing COVID and thank you for your service.

Speaker:

We don't need a Labor opposition.

Speaker:

That can only be what I said about them just gleaning public sentiment

Speaker:

and just cowering underneath it.

Speaker:

So, um, so anyway, um, what else did we have?

Speaker:

Well, I think you missed the shovel.

Speaker:

Oh, did I miss the shovel one?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Oh yeah, so just been catching up on the latest analysis in the media

Speaker:

and got to tell you, This person who forced Gladys Berejiklian to have a

Speaker:

relationship with a corrupt politician, hide it from the public, give out dodgy

Speaker:

government grants, and then resign sounds like a nasty piece of work.

Speaker:

Honestly, the Shovel Batuta Advocate sum up these issues that we face.

Speaker:

In 10 to 20 words, so well, so often, compared to major media outlets.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

So, um, what do we have here, um, uh, The Spectator, for example,

Speaker:

said, Friday's taking down of Gladys Berejiklian by the New South Wales.

Speaker:

ICAC is a political hit job.

Speaker:

Not your typical party political hit, but a deliberate calculated decapitation

Speaker:

of the New South Wales government by an unelected body determined to prove

Speaker:

it's bigger than any mere politician.

Speaker:

In moving against an elected Premier, doing her damnedest to steer her state

Speaker:

through its biggest crisis since the war, ICAC decided its narrow agenda,

Speaker:

fighting corruption, and it's outweighed profound state and national interests.

Speaker:

All said with a straight face.

Speaker:

Yeah, so, um, um, Essential Poll came out with some stuff today and it said,

Speaker:

um, to what extent would you support or oppose the establishment of a,

Speaker:

sort of, basically a federal ICAC?

Speaker:

And total support, 78%.

Speaker:

Total oppose, 11%.

Speaker:

And that's been consistent for a number of years that they've done the poll.

Speaker:

Um, in terms of age groups and sex, um, uh, it's a large majority of all

Speaker:

demographics would support a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

Um, stronger support amongst those aged over 55 and Greens voters, and no

Speaker:

surprise that Coalition voters were the most likely to oppose a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

So even amongst the, let's see, the Coalition supporters, It was still 77

Speaker:

percent in favour and 13 percent against.

Speaker:

It's extremely high, so, um Must be hard showing your face at the moment

Speaker:

being a Liberal supporter, surely.

Speaker:

Surely even they must be thinking, it is time to clean this up.

Speaker:

Oh, I was just saying, Labor's just as bad.

Speaker:

Seriously, that's what that's saying.

Speaker:

It's true, they are.

Speaker:

It's the 9 percent of Greens voters who oppose it I'm wondering about.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Thinking about Gladys Berejiklian's resignation, which is closer to your view?

Speaker:

The first is it's maybe more supportive of a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

And the other one is it's made me less supportive of a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

And, um, 47 percent say that the treatment of GLADIS makes them

Speaker:

more supportive of a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

And 21 percent say the treatment of GLADIS makes them less

Speaker:

supportive of a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

Meaning, She was so hard done by, they feel that they don't want that

Speaker:

to happen in the federal sphere?

Speaker:

Come on!

Speaker:

One other, uh, possible explanation is the optics.

Speaker:

So, I mean, she normally is not unkempt, and the day she came out and announced

Speaker:

it, she did look very like a victim.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

You know, whereas a man might have faced it with some, you know, stoicism Could

Speaker:

be some gender socialization at play.

Speaker:

She was pretty stoic though.

Speaker:

Drunken?

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

She didn't Holding back tears?

Speaker:

No, she didn't look They didn't look Her eyes didn't look moist to me.

Speaker:

She's a hard nut, I reckon.

Speaker:

Anyway, that might be a possible explanation for the Yeah, the

Speaker:

telling thing in that last one actually is the unsure 32%.

Speaker:

That just means a lot of people have no idea about any of it.

Speaker:

What's interesting is that 54 percent of men More supportive,

Speaker:

but only 40 percent of women.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

So they obviously feel that she's hard done by, I think.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

So, this resignation of Gladys, correct, made women not as strong

Speaker:

in their support of a federal ICAC.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

Right, um, so, our new leader, well, the new leader for New South Wales.

Speaker:

The good news for New South Wales.

Speaker:

Rub your hands together, you've got a brand new Premier.

Speaker:

And doesn't he look good?

Speaker:

Dominic Perretier.

Speaker:

All of our Premiers are Palaszczuk, Perretier.

Speaker:

When you've got an awkward name, just add an A at the end of it.

Speaker:

Shay?

Speaker:

I was going to say, old owner's name doesn't spell Shay.

Speaker:

Ray.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, there was a photo of him, because of the, uh, sort of acceleration of the

Speaker:

Freedom Day that he brought forward, um, him and a few of his colleagues

Speaker:

standing in a bar having a beer.

Speaker:

And, uh, it's a very blokey photo.

Speaker:

scene and if you convert it to black and white it looks very 1950s and

Speaker:

you know, state of the art sailings just come in and so I think New South

Speaker:

Wales have moved their clocks forward an hour and backwards 40 years.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

That's the way it looks to me.

Speaker:

So I mean people joke about Queensland being full of hicks and all the rest

Speaker:

of it and And, New South Wales, when I look at this photo and your leader.

Speaker:

Hey, we got VAD before New South Wales.

Speaker:

Yes, indeed.

Speaker:

So, uh, not a good look, New South Wales.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Pull your fingers up.

Speaker:

Pull your fingers out.

Speaker:

Pull your socks up.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, what we've got, um, poor New South Wales, they've got a

Speaker:

Pentecostal Prime Minister and a hardline right wing Catholic Premier.

Speaker:

But not Opus D.

Speaker:

Well, not openly and not admitting to it, but he was brought up in a

Speaker:

school which was Which was Opus Dei.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And he would have had a lot of spiritual teaching from Opus Dei ministers.

Speaker:

And, uh, so, so no, he's not, you couldn't say he's Opus Dei, but

Speaker:

they're a very secretive bunch.

Speaker:

They are.

Speaker:

and It's one of those ones where, of course, you're going to deny you're

Speaker:

over stoked, because that's the whole point of being over stoked.

Speaker:

So what we're saying is he's not a universally Unitarian.

Speaker:

He's not what?

Speaker:

Universally Unitarian.

Speaker:

Um.

Speaker:

So in America, when you're an atheist, but you can't be an

Speaker:

atheist, you have to go to a church.

Speaker:

Ah, okay.

Speaker:

It's the church you go to.

Speaker:

Oh, right.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

So who knows, but he's got some views which we'll come to, which, Um, are quite

Speaker:

conservative in terms of social things.

Speaker:

And he's also got some economic views that are just so neoliberal.

Speaker:

It's probably the most worrying thing about this guy.

Speaker:

So, let's talk about, um He's willing to sacrifice a few New South Wales

Speaker:

people on the altar of, um Pubs.

Speaker:

Yeah, yes.

Speaker:

Of the economy.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

So, um, let's have a look at some of the things that he has said, so,

Speaker:

so he's definitely a member of the conservative right wing faction of

Speaker:

the Liberal Party, uh, he opposed the marriage equality, uh, bills.

Speaker:

He opposed A bill requiring priests to disclose child sexual abuse.

Speaker:

He voted against the introduction of safe exclusion zones outside abortion clinics.

Speaker:

He voted against abortion decriminalization.

Speaker:

Wants to stop welfare payments to women fleeing domestic violence, as this

Speaker:

allegedly contributes to rising divorce rates in single parents families.

Speaker:

He did a shoddy job managing the iCare programs, which

Speaker:

cost NSW 3 billion, left it.

Speaker:

Workers without compensation.

Speaker:

He blames the welfare system for declining birth rates and family

Speaker:

breakdown because, uh, if you've got a welfare system, you don't need kids

Speaker:

to look after you in your old age.

Speaker:

Quite literally, that's the thinking there.

Speaker:

Uh, yeah, there's no incentive.

Speaker:

Stated, quote, there's no incentive to have children if the state will

Speaker:

take care of you in your old age.

Speaker:

He, of course, has six kids and he's one of them.

Speaker:

Um, well, with any luck, they'll desert him in his old age.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

You need to rely on the welfare state.

Speaker:

And he praised Donald Trump's election saying it was a victory of people who

Speaker:

have been taken for granted by the elites.

Speaker:

None of that looks good.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Taken for granted by the elites like Donald Trump?

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

New South Wales, how did you vote this guy in?

Speaker:

Oh wait, you didn't.

Speaker:

It just happens, doesn't it?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Ah.

Speaker:

Roman says, I'm wondering whether the assisted dying legislation in New

Speaker:

South Wales has any chance of getting through with the new leadership.

Speaker:

Apparently he has said it's going to be a conscience vote.

Speaker:

Who knows?

Speaker:

Some people have suggested he's Is that like the conscience vote that

Speaker:

we had on abortion up in Queensland?

Speaker:

Yes, I wonder where if he Actually did exercise that vote

Speaker:

according to your conscience.

Speaker:

You'll get kicked out of the party.

Speaker:

Yes, who knows?

Speaker:

Yeah, who knows how that will go.

Speaker:

Interesting one.

Speaker:

Didn't he need an independent support to form government?

Speaker:

And that's why he's even I don't know.

Speaker:

I think they're running a minority government there.

Speaker:

I'm not sure.

Speaker:

But, um, some things I've read, people have said, look,

Speaker:

he's toned down the social.

Speaker:

Moral issues a little bit in recent times, they felt.

Speaker:

Um, but I also heard that Gladys fell on her own sword so that, um, effectively

Speaker:

the Nationals wouldn't take over.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Because if she was standing aside Ah, then the Deputy Barilaro Right.

Speaker:

Would be Premier.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Whereas if she resigned, a Liberal got to take.

Speaker:

Premier the, yeah, the premier shape.

Speaker:

Oh, okay.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

So, so it was a smart, a political move rather than, right.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Um, yeah.

Speaker:

Maybe we've got it wrong.

Speaker:

I mean, maybe it's not so bad after all.

Speaker:

Rowan Dean in the Spectator says it's not often these days that somebody

Speaker:

who is a conservative, a Christian and a contributor to this magazine.

Speaker:

Ends up as one of the most powerful leaders in the country.

Speaker:

So the news that Dominic Perrottet is now Premier of Australia's Premier State is

Speaker:

to be warmly welcomed by all who value traditionalism, reason and freedom.

Speaker:

Pop out the bubbly, and if it's Dom Perignon, so much the better.

Speaker:

Dom Perignon for Dom Perrottet.

Speaker:

Yes, so clever.

Speaker:

Yeah, so lots of people, of course, have been talking about his Catholic faith.

Speaker:

End.

Speaker:

what that means to the decisions he'll make as Premier.

Speaker:

And he's obviously picked up a lot of moral ideas from his Catholic faith,

Speaker:

one would have thought, and he's going to be making decisions, one would have

Speaker:

thought, based on his Catholic faith.

Speaker:

Catholic faith.

Speaker:

Some people in the religious groups are appalled that people are questioning and

Speaker:

are concerned about this man's faith as if it's got nothing to do with his job.

Speaker:

He's premier of a state.

Speaker:

He's, he is the guy who runs the ship in terms of lawmaking, laws that are

Speaker:

basically about morals quite often.

Speaker:

He's not just a car park attendant, in which case you're right, if he

Speaker:

was, then his religion would be irrelevant, but given the decisions

Speaker:

he's having to make, it's entirely relevant to know what his religion is,

Speaker:

because you get an idea of how he'll make his decisions based on that.

Speaker:

So, so is religious belief relevant?

Speaker:

And there was a really interesting article by Chris Stephenson Who is a sort

Speaker:

of a pro secular writer in Queensland.

Speaker:

I've never met her.

Speaker:

I hope to meet her at some stage.

Speaker:

Have you ever met her, Kristen?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, um, she tells an interesting story which sort of exhibits why this is

Speaker:

important, uh, religious belief in terms of people who are not just decision

Speaker:

makers, but also just commentators.

Speaker:

So there's a Melbourne emergency doctor, Stephen Parnas, who has

Speaker:

become something of a social media celebrity during the COVID 19 pandemic.

Speaker:

So he's been tweeting about his direct experience with COVID patients and

Speaker:

encouraging people to get vaccinated.

Speaker:

So he's an emergency doctor, Stephen Parnas.

Speaker:

And this week, uh, our symbolic hero of the pandemic, Was told he was just

Speaker:

plain wrong about the subject of faith and power, and he spat the dummy.

Speaker:

So, uh, this guy, Dr.

Speaker:

Parnas, um, Vented his frustration that people were making an issue of

Speaker:

peritaze devout Catholicism, and Parnas tweeted, I can't believe we're back here!

Speaker:

Assess any MP on their politics and policies rather than

Speaker:

in their religious beliefs.

Speaker:

So, there's a, uh, researcher, Ronnie Salt, was quick to respond and say, Oh,

Speaker:

dear listener, swear words coming up, keep the kids out of this, on this episode.

Speaker:

Um, so Ronnie Salt says, How fucking dare you?

Speaker:

How dare you sit up there on your privileged hill of male

Speaker:

superiority and tell women not to discuss powerful men's religion?

Speaker:

How fucking dare you?

Speaker:

Powerful religious men use their religion to undermine

Speaker:

the rights of women every day.

Speaker:

Good point.

Speaker:

Parnas dug in.

Speaker:

He said, uh, it was an ad hominem attack.

Speaker:

He referred to the tsunami of responses he'd got from women,

Speaker:

and then in a fit of pique, he announced his departure from Twitter.

Speaker:

Time to leave this cesspit behind for a while.

Speaker:

So And the classic response to that is, this is not an airport, you don't

Speaker:

need to announce your departure.

Speaker:

That's it.

Speaker:

That's it.

Speaker:

Don't let the door hit you on the bum as you leave.

Speaker:

So, Chris Stevenson says, Parnas no doubt was also upset by my

Speaker:

contribution to the discussion, because she had Tweeted to him, it seems.

Speaker:

Why didn't you disclose the fact you were arguing as a fellow committed Catholic?

Speaker:

Why don't you disclose this when you're arguing against Voluntary Assisted Dying?

Speaker:

It matters because truth is, no matter what safeguards were in

Speaker:

place, nor how effective, you'd still oppose it because of your faith.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, because you have hardline faith, it's coloured your thinking on this issue.

Speaker:

You should have disclosed.

Speaker:

Your Catholicism, Mr Parnas, about these issues.

Speaker:

I don't see people commenting on Dan Andrews faith.

Speaker:

I comment on that all the time, and I say Sorry, but you are the rare outlier.

Speaker:

Because to most people, they don't care what his faith is because it

Speaker:

doesn't seem to impact his decisions.

Speaker:

His decisions are made for the good of the people of Victoria, not the

Speaker:

good of his follow faith believers.

Speaker:

So his decisions are actually often contrary to the interests of his faith.

Speaker:

Correct.

Speaker:

So, that's okay, because you go, clearly he wasn't influenced by

Speaker:

his faith, uh, in a way that was contrary to the ultimate decision.

Speaker:

But where people make a decision in alignment with their faith's

Speaker:

requirements, then you have a problem.

Speaker:

As we'll get onto With Perrottet, there's a situation with the running of

Speaker:

cemeteries in Sydney, where independent public service groups have said, we

Speaker:

need to amalgamate all these cemeteries and have them run by one organization.

Speaker:

Guess what?

Speaker:

The Catholics don't like that.

Speaker:

Because they lose power and money.

Speaker:

And also where would they hide the funds when they're being sued by sex abuse

Speaker:

victims if it isn't in the cemeteries?

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

So, Perrottet has come out very clearly and told his department

Speaker:

very clearly we want to support the Catholics position when it

Speaker:

comes to the running of cemeteries.

Speaker:

So he's making a decision that will favour the Catholic Church.

Speaker:

So, it's important we know, um, what's guiding their decision making.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

Dan Andrews in that case, according to his track record, is actually

Speaker:

going, well, stuff you Catholic Church, you don't get to run the

Speaker:

cerem the cemeteries and you miss out.

Speaker:

And so, um, Uh, his Catholic faith doesn't really come up except to say, gosh,

Speaker:

he made a decision that was contrary.

Speaker:

Who's Dan Catholic?

Speaker:

Uh, no, he's, uh, I don't know what he is.

Speaker:

He's Christian.

Speaker:

He's Christian, yeah.

Speaker:

I don't know that he's Catholic.

Speaker:

But your, your faith, um, didn't, um, stop you from making a decision contrary

Speaker:

to the interests of your faith group.

Speaker:

Well, um, a good example of that was, um, 80 percent of, People support Voluntary

Speaker:

Assisted Dying, uh, and I would find it hard to believe that he would vote.

Speaker:

In favor of his electorate rather than in line with his faith.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

And yes, and therefore, there is a deciding influence that I think

Speaker:

the public needs to know about.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

It's entirely relevant.

Speaker:

So, um, because it's relevant to the job, because he's making decisions that affect

Speaker:

the, the church that he's a part of.

Speaker:

So, um, so anyway, um.

Speaker:

Let me just get on with this article by Chris Stevenson.

Speaker:

So, um, so yeah, he had also made comments about Voluntary Assisted Dying.

Speaker:

So, uh, Chris Stevenson goes on, before Dr.

Speaker:

Parnas became a Twitter hero, I knew him as a passionate advocate

Speaker:

against Voluntary Assisted Dying.

Speaker:

And because I know that most people who oppose Voluntary

Speaker:

Assisted Dying do so for religious reasons, I had done some research.

Speaker:

Dr.

Speaker:

Parnas works at St.

Speaker:

Vincent's Hospital, a Catholic institution devoted to bringing

Speaker:

God's love to those in need through the healing ministry of Jesus.

Speaker:

In 2018, Dr.

Speaker:

Parnas and his associate, uh, Dr.

Speaker:

Michael, delivered the rerun Navarium Oration at the

Speaker:

Australian Catholic University.

Speaker:

The oration was titled, Widening the Door of Hope, a response to the

Speaker:

Victorian assisted dying legislation.

Speaker:

A cradle Catholic, Dr.

Speaker:

Parnas was educated by Jesuits.

Speaker:

He remains an active supporter of his alma mater, even sitting

Speaker:

on the school's foundation board.

Speaker:

And he's also active in his local Catholic Church.

Speaker:

So, Chris Stevenson said, I had to go looking for that information.

Speaker:

When Dr Parnas appears in newspapers, on radio, or in parliamentary briefings,

Speaker:

or rails against a voluntary assisted dying, he relies on his credibility

Speaker:

as a doctor, never disclosing that the fundamental reason for his

Speaker:

opposition is his deep Catholic faith.

Speaker:

Just so.

Speaker:

When he suggested that Premier Perrottet should not be judged on

Speaker:

his religious beliefs, he failed to disclose that he was speaking as a

Speaker:

fellow Catholic and political activist.

Speaker:

So, people need to know that.

Speaker:

Good point, Chris.

Speaker:

Very good.

Speaker:

Um, uh, she goes on and I think there's other examples that she

Speaker:

gave in relation to somebody else who was talking about, um, um.

Speaker:

Marriage equality and claimed to be a person of no particular faith, but

Speaker:

she smelled a rat investigated, and sure enough, they were religious.

Speaker:

So good article on why we need to know.

Speaker:

And I think, um, hard to argue, um, and yeah, I've got a link to the article

Speaker:

about the cemeteries and well, you know, I, I think, um, Uh, we don't need to know

Speaker:

about um, what businesses politicians are involved in, because obviously

Speaker:

that's their own personal business and why is it any concern of ours?

Speaker:

You'd never say that, would you?

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Yeah, indeed.

Speaker:

And let's face it, these groups are businesses.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

These church groups are running businesses, and so, you know, He may

Speaker:

not be a shareholder, because they don't have shares, but he's as good

Speaker:

as a shareholder in these groups.

Speaker:

And, um, you remember the dual nationality case with the Catholic Church?

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

With a member of dual nationality with the Catholic Church back in the fifties.

Speaker:

I think it was.

Speaker:

So do you remember the scandal a couple of years ago about the section of 44

Speaker:

and whether you are a member of the.

Speaker:

And so it went to the high court because they said being a member of the Catholic

Speaker:

faith effectively their allegiance is to a foreign country, which is the Vatican.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, back then it was recognised that an allegiance to the Vatican

Speaker:

was a conflict of interest.

Speaker:

Did the High Court actually say that?

Speaker:

It didn't say that, I think, but certainly there was It was worthy

Speaker:

of going to the High Court about it.

Speaker:

It was worthy to go, yeah.

Speaker:

It was raised as a concern back then.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, um, so no, we need to look at his faith and, you know, let's

Speaker:

see what he does in that regard.

Speaker:

Now, more worrying, I think, is, um, uh, yep, Alison, we've just done that,

Speaker:

I'll just leave the comments, keep commenting in there, so Perrottet, uh,

Speaker:

his, incredibly, I think his neoliberalism is going to be more of a worry than New

Speaker:

South Wales and his religion, I think.

Speaker:

Um, so this was from an article on the Saturday paper by Mike second, and, uh,

Speaker:

Pite is the whole neoliberal package.

Speaker:

So Green's MP or MLC David s Shoebridge ticks off some of

Speaker:

the manifestations of this.

Speaker:

So, according to David s Shoebridge, um, as treasurer ate was completely

Speaker:

committed to a privatization agenda.

Speaker:

Albeit rebadged as Asset Recycling, rather than Privatization, Asset Recycling.

Speaker:

So, Perrottet oversaw the sale of the government's 49 percent stake in the

Speaker:

WestConnex motorway for 11 billion.

Speaker:

Uh, prior to that we've seen the sale of electricity distribution and generators.

Speaker:

Uh, sold the land titles registry, actually Queensland did that as well.

Speaker:

He's had a highly developed plan to sell off all the state's plantation forests.

Speaker:

In a billion dollar one off deal, but the terrible Black Summer fires did so

Speaker:

much damage to the estate it took buyers out of the market, otherwise you would

Speaker:

have sold the state's plantation forests.

Speaker:

We don't have enough appreciation of the commons, and that the commons

Speaker:

belongs to multiple generations.

Speaker:

You convert the commons into money.

Speaker:

And blow it on something, you've just robbed future generations.

Speaker:

Yes, but it gets you elected next time around.

Speaker:

Who cares about 20 years down the line?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

It's just a, this pillaging of future generations by the current

Speaker:

generation is not recognized by people.

Speaker:

And also, I think there's a fairly good argument that privatization

Speaker:

hasn't shown the benefits that were argued back in the eighties.

Speaker:

Uh, never does.

Speaker:

So the whole thing with that, um, disaster with.

Speaker:

Because they've got to make a profit.

Speaker:

They have to do everything that the public service would have done

Speaker:

in terms of provide service, but then make profit on top of that.

Speaker:

You've got to do more with less.

Speaker:

Obviously, standards of service deteriorate.

Speaker:

Well, the argument is that civil service is so inefficient that

Speaker:

the profit is made from making the thing run more efficiently.

Speaker:

Yeah, particularly when it comes to monopoly type stuff.

Speaker:

Electricity, water, these are not things that you put in the hands of private

Speaker:

enterprise who can then screw you over.

Speaker:

These things, as a society, we need.

Speaker:

Right, um, so according to Shoebridge, he's a very aggressive privatiser.

Speaker:

The only real constraint is that so much has already been sold off

Speaker:

by labour and liberal governments.

Speaker:

There's not much left to sell.

Speaker:

So, um, so yeah, with the public insurer iCare, he got it to operate along more

Speaker:

private sector market based lines, and he developed a two billion dollar whole.

Speaker:

During his watch, which saw thousands of injured workers

Speaker:

inappropriately lose their benefits.

Speaker:

So, um, so yeah, if there's something to sell off, he will.

Speaker:

Now, what he also did was, uh, he got the Treasury, the New South Wales

Speaker:

Treasury, to, um, borrow 10 billion at very low interest rates that

Speaker:

he just invested in high yielding stocks and other financial assets.

Speaker:

Which is basically just gambling with taxpayers money.

Speaker:

Ten billion dollar loan, a cheap interest, and then went and

Speaker:

bought a few investments with it.

Speaker:

So Saul Aislake is not impressed.

Speaker:

I really like Saul Aislake.

Speaker:

And that's alright.

Speaker:

Treasury did it, so it's Wow.

Speaker:

So, um, I really like Saul Eslark.

Speaker:

He is a good, uh, neutral, uh, economist, I reckon.

Speaker:

I saw him speak live once at a lunch, and I just came away from it thinking,

Speaker:

Wow, is that guy in charge of his brief?

Speaker:

Like, he He is a smart guy, Saul Eslake.

Speaker:

When's the last time you had that experience when you

Speaker:

watched a politician talk?

Speaker:

Oh, Saul Eslake's not a politician.

Speaker:

I know.

Speaker:

We have so many great people in Australia, hardly any of them seem to be in politics.

Speaker:

The last time I was impressed by a politician for just being

Speaker:

super bright on something.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

You know, sometimes Malcolm Turnbull said things.

Speaker:

But he never put it into action, really.

Speaker:

But after Tony Abbott, when Malcolm Turnbull came in, it was like,

Speaker:

Oh, finally, we've got somebody in charge here who's not embarrassed.

Speaker:

He's not embarrassing.

Speaker:

And he spoke and you thought that all makes perfect sense.

Speaker:

But of course, what subsequently happened in action didn't.

Speaker:

Neat.

Speaker:

The promises.

Speaker:

I remember thinking that, um, the best Republican, um, president

Speaker:

the US has had in years, Right.

Speaker:

Um, was Obama.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

He was all words.

Speaker:

Very eloquent.

Speaker:

He was incredibly eloquent.

Speaker:

It's true.

Speaker:

But he was a right wing politician.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

Indeed.

Speaker:

So in terms of one in power who who's impressed as being totally over their

Speaker:

brief Let me think about that one.

Speaker:

Okay, can you think of one?

Speaker:

Not lately.

Speaker:

No Penny Wang.

Speaker:

I don't know about yeah, Penny Wang.

Speaker:

Maybe that seemed to be across her Portfolio, I don't know about impressed.

Speaker:

Mmm, but certainly Um, so what else has, uh, Saul Eslake Peritei?

Speaker:

Um, he says that's a risky thing to do.

Speaker:

Although one thing he's looking at doing is, um, What'd you go like Iceland then?

Speaker:

Uh, what about Iceland?

Speaker:

Oh, they put all their money in No, sorry, it was the UK.

Speaker:

Councils that have put all their money into the Icelandic banks that went, right,

Speaker:

collapsed during the financial crisis.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

But the Icelandic people actually were the only ones on the planet who really took

Speaker:

on the managers in charge of those banks.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And, and punished them.

Speaker:

Really said we're not gonna let that happen again.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

But, but it was, you know, government's gambling with money.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Anyway, uh, so Saul Eslake says that's dangerous, although, um, Perrottet

Speaker:

wants to change the GST formula.

Speaker:

He says Western Australia is grossly overpaid, and Saul Eslake says,

Speaker:

fair enough, they are, and that's a good point by Perrottet, so, um, so

Speaker:

he says, yep, that's a good point.

Speaker:

Also, um, what else does Perrottet want to do is, uh, currently, there's

Speaker:

a lot of stamp duty on land transfers.

Speaker:

And he's saying we should get rid of the stamp duty on land transfers and instead

Speaker:

put an annual land tax on everybody, including dwellings that you own.

Speaker:

So rather than collecting tax on the transfer of property, just

Speaker:

collect it on owning property.

Speaker:

Makes sense?

Speaker:

Yeah, apparently.

Speaker:

Um, like rates, but a government rather than a, a state government bill

Speaker:

rather than a local government bill.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Land tax.

Speaker:

There's currently land tax in Queensland and other states, but you have to have

Speaker:

a significant amount of property that is not principal place of residence

Speaker:

when you start getting a land tax bill.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Happy days when you can get a land tax bill, because you,

Speaker:

because you're doing all right.

Speaker:

Unless you're the federal government.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, um, Because they don't get any of that.

Speaker:

No, no, other way around, um, a friend of mine is up near the new army base,

Speaker:

or the extension of the army base up in Rockhampton, and apparently there's a

Speaker:

whole load of farms have been resumed.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

To extend the army base.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And the local shire has lost two million dollars of rates a year.

Speaker:

Of course.

Speaker:

Because it's now owned by the federal government who won't pay rates.

Speaker:

Yes, that's it.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

There we go.

Speaker:

So it was a huge hole in the budget.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

Interesting.

Speaker:

Um, Also, um, so yeah, Salt Lake says nearly all economists

Speaker:

agree that's a good idea.

Speaker:

Get rid of the transactional stamp duty, putting in a annual land tax.

Speaker:

I thought there was a talk of putting in, um, stamp duty on possibly share trading

Speaker:

to try and stop speculative trading.

Speaker:

Oh, lots of people put it up as a good idea, but I've never

Speaker:

heard any government actually.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

But I mean, was there a reason that land You have stamped easy

Speaker:

on land was for a similar reason.

Speaker:

I don't know how it came about, it was just easier.

Speaker:

I don't know the historic, the history of it.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah, I don't know.

Speaker:

Shares probably did have some sort of transfer tax at some point, but not sure.

Speaker:

And of course the other reason not to is Because stamp duty is

Speaker:

paid when you have cash in hand.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Whereas a land tax, you may actually be asset rich and cash poor.

Speaker:

Yes, that's right.

Speaker:

It's a risky bold move if he does it.

Speaker:

So, but he seems to be a bit of a risk taker.

Speaker:

I mean, he's happy to take a risk with the state's finances on that loan, so.

Speaker:

Uh, Interesting character.

Speaker:

Not his money.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

Well, this is the thing, isn't it?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Um, so, voluntary assisted dying.

Speaker:

There's an independent Alex Greenwich.

Speaker:

Greenwich?

Speaker:

Greenwich?

Speaker:

Greenwich.

Speaker:

Greenwich.

Speaker:

He's going to put up a bill and Parataya said it's going to be a conscience vote.

Speaker:

So that will be interesting to see how that all pans out.

Speaker:

By the way, uh, voluntary assisted dying in Victoria.

Speaker:

How's it been going?

Speaker:

And Um, it's been in effect for more than three years in Victoria, and there's a

Speaker:

report from Victoria's Voluntary Assisted Dying Review Board, and it says during

Speaker:

that time, 836 people have been assessed as eligible for Voluntary Assisted Dying,

Speaker:

uh, 674 permit applications were made.

Speaker:

Um, 597 permits were issued.

Speaker:

Not sure what the difference is there.

Speaker:

Uh, the big important number is 331 people have died from taking the

Speaker:

prescribed medications in Victoria.

Speaker:

Not a huge number, but kind of what you'd expect really.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

One every three days.

Speaker:

So, um, so, there we go.

Speaker:

Um, Dan Andrews is going to bring in secular qualified mental

Speaker:

health practitioners in every government secondary school as

Speaker:

opposed to chaplains who have to be from a religious organization.

Speaker:

Good on you, Dan Andrews.

Speaker:

Um, did you see the story about the, um, the artist, um, Jens Harning,

Speaker:

um, so he's a Danish artist.

Speaker:

Just a little light change of pace here, dear listener, from

Speaker:

all this depressing stuff.

Speaker:

This is somebody fighting back the system.

Speaker:

So, um, so Harning created, uh, two artworks in 2007 and 2011, where he

Speaker:

affixed bank notes onto a canvas as a commentary on the average incomes in

Speaker:

Denmark and Austria respectively in the Konsten Museum of Modern Art loved them.

Speaker:

And I offered them in the equivalent.

Speaker:

Uh, of 3, 900 to remake both of those, um, uh, canvases.

Speaker:

So they provided him with 115, 000 worth of cash to put on the

Speaker:

canvas, and they were going to pay him basically 3, 900 for his fee.

Speaker:

And when they unwrapped the canvases, they were met with two completely blank

Speaker:

canvases titled, Take the Money and Run.

Speaker:

So the, uh, the art gallery or whatever it is, um, Museum of Modern Art, uh, they're

Speaker:

suing him now, but he doesn't care.

Speaker:

He's not paying it back.

Speaker:

He said, The work is that I have, I have taken their money.

Speaker:

Or the word is.

Speaker:

I encourage other people who've been working conditions as

Speaker:

miserable as mine to do the same.

Speaker:

If they're sitting in some shitty job and not getting paid.

Speaker:

And, uh, actually being asked to pay money to go to work, uh,

Speaker:

grab what you can and beat it, so That would be tough as an artist.

Speaker:

It's like, man, you're only paying me 3, 900, I've got to do all this stuff,

Speaker:

blah, blah, blah, like you Meanwhile, you're happy to give me 115, 000.

Speaker:

The dollars to stick on the bloody canvas.

Speaker:

You would actually have the money in your hand and look at the

Speaker:

canvas and go, what am I doing?

Speaker:

New idea.

Speaker:

Take the money and run.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And you keep an eye on the messages for me, Joe.

Speaker:

Um, if you can, Alison and Bronwyn are having a good chat in there.

Speaker:

So, um, uh, oh, Alison says, I don't think Dan Andrews announcement

Speaker:

about secular professionals will affect chaplaincy at all.

Speaker:

I'm sure it's a totally separate thing.

Speaker:

Um, Roman thinks it's being offered as an alternative.

Speaker:

Anyway, we'll get further details on that as they come to hand.

Speaker:

Um, lots of different people saying goodbye to Facebook.

Speaker:

So Reason Australia was, did an article about Fiona Patton, who

Speaker:

basically said, there's just too much nasty commentary that it totally

Speaker:

spoils the page, and too hard to deal with, and so we're just out of here.

Speaker:

No point having a Facebook page.

Speaker:

Nope.

Speaker:

Find some other way of dealing with it.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

That's not surprising.

Speaker:

No, it does seem to be getting pretty ugly.

Speaker:

There's been no resolution yet of the whole thing with people making defamatory

Speaker:

comments that the owner of a page Facebook took themselves down for a while, so

Speaker:

Facebook took themselves down, right, yes.

Speaker:

Solved that problem.

Speaker:

Yes, um, but the government does recognize that it's up to them to change the law

Speaker:

on that one, so they're trying to get the state To agree to something on that.

Speaker:

So, uh, that's going to be a legislative solution to that one.

Speaker:

Um, here's stories of people going missing and searchers

Speaker:

are sent out looking for them.

Speaker:

So, um, there was this guy in Turkey who went missing.

Speaker:

I've heard about that, yeah.

Speaker:

And, um, uh, He'd been drinking with some friends and he wandered into a

Speaker:

forest and when he failed to return, uh, Well, he's out in the forest

Speaker:

and he's going, Jesus, I'm lost.

Speaker:

He sees this group of people walking along and he says, I'll just, I'll

Speaker:

just tag along with these guys and eventually I'll be led to, you

Speaker:

know, out of this goddamn forest.

Speaker:

And he's walking along with them for about half an hour or so.

Speaker:

Then they start calling out his name.

Speaker:

He says, I'm here.

Speaker:

What?

Speaker:

And they were a search party looking for him.

Speaker:

I actually have a similar story.

Speaker:

Really?

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah, we went to a beach on Jersey, which was down the side of a cliff.

Speaker:

And we came back and we picked up the car in the car park on the main beach.

Speaker:

Towards the end of the afternoon and we saw the lifeboat go out and we went

Speaker:

down to have a chat with them and they said, Oh, yeah, apparently there's a

Speaker:

family stuck in the cove around there and the tides coming in and we're

Speaker:

really worried about them and we go.

Speaker:

That was us.

Speaker:

We climbed up the side of the glove.

Speaker:

There's a footpath up the side of the glove.

Speaker:

At least you didn't join the search party in a boat.

Speaker:

I wept with laughter when I saw that.

Speaker:

And then you're in the boat.

Speaker:

Joe!

Speaker:

What?

Speaker:

Oh, it's me you're looking for.

Speaker:

Ah, that would have been funny.

Speaker:

Um, Jessica Rowe.

Speaker:

So.

Speaker:

She has a podcast.

Speaker:

I think it was a podcast.

Speaker:

I mean, who doesn't have a podcast it!

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

When you tell people you're on a podcast, they go, Eh, everyone is.

Speaker:

Well, I'm lucky.

Speaker:

I seem to be an age demographic where it's still pretty rare.

Speaker:

So yeah, people are impressed because you hang out with old people, old white men.

Speaker:

I usually leave that part out.

Speaker:

Anyway, she had a podcast and she had, um, well, she's obviously tried to appeal

Speaker:

to a left ish type of audience, I think.

Speaker:

And she made the mistake of inviting Pauline Hanson onto the show and

Speaker:

doing a bit of a soft interview, I think, because Pauline talks of love,

Speaker:

raising kids and why she keeps going.

Speaker:

But a lot of people tweeted back at her saying, what the hell are you doing

Speaker:

giving this woman a platform, essentially?

Speaker:

And she then contacted, uh, her bosses and said, can we drop

Speaker:

that podcast and delete it?

Speaker:

Cause I've felt the heat from all this.

Speaker:

So what do you reckon, Shay?

Speaker:

Is that?

Speaker:

Is that, uh, cancelling or is it anything to be concerned about or do you have

Speaker:

any thoughts on, on her succumbing to the backlash from the community?

Speaker:

No, I just think, um, Grace Tame lands her communication with a real clang.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And I just think she's super, super powerful.

Speaker:

And I don't remember the exact quote.

Speaker:

But it came out almost immediately after Rose and it was just like, sometimes when

Speaker:

Grace talks it, even for me, who I seem to like, think I'm pretty up to date,

Speaker:

it's like being slapped across the face.

Speaker:

It's so obviously, you know, impactful that Jessica Rowe was doing this.

Speaker:

So I think Jessica Rowe bowed to pressure, fine.

Speaker:

She should have maybe prepared for some backlash.

Speaker:

You're gonna have Pauline Hanson.

Speaker:

Like, Pauline Hanson's made a career out of being controversial.

Speaker:

It was never just gonna slide through, was it?

Speaker:

I think it's important not to see people with opposing political views.

Speaker:

As monsters, which is what happens when you isolate them when you don't hear them.

Speaker:

And in some ways, it is important to realize that these are real people

Speaker:

who might be misguided, um, but still think they are doing the right thing.

Speaker:

Um, I, I think it becomes a lot easier to come to bipartisan agreement.

Speaker:

And the problem is we are too divided.

Speaker:

We see the other side as the other.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

And we don't sit down and talk to them.

Speaker:

Mm hmm I guess the counter to that would be that Pauline Hanson

Speaker:

has plenty of opportunity to Demonstrate to people her humanity.

Speaker:

So if she hasn't managed to do that in the forums that are offered to her

Speaker:

already Why take up space on a forum?

Speaker:

Because if she's showing it in a forum, it's not necessarily going to

Speaker:

be a right wing forum that the left leaning people aren't going to hear.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

This to me is a little bit like, um, George W.

Speaker:

Bush.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

Has been on a lot of programs post his presidency where they've gone soft on him.

Speaker:

And there's been almost a rehabilitation of George W.

Speaker:

And, uh, he's a nice guy, he's an ex president, and we'll

Speaker:

forget all that stuff about him.

Speaker:

The Middle East, and, and just, uh, going soft on him,

Speaker:

I, I, I sort of think why he's had his chance to put his views out there.

Speaker:

Um, Grace Tain, let's see what she said.

Speaker:

She said, This is how discrimination and hate is suddenly enabled and normalized.

Speaker:

Everyone's entitled to their own view, but not all views should be

Speaker:

valorized by promoting their source.

Speaker:

Falling doesn't need to be heard, but those who's oppressing, she's

Speaker:

both driven and reinforced, do.

Speaker:

So, that was, um, that was Tame.

Speaker:

What's her first name?

Speaker:

I've got her first name, so.

Speaker:

Isn't it Grace Tame?

Speaker:

Grace Tame.

Speaker:

So,

Speaker:

uh, from Sean McAuliffe, he says, Isn't this a story about

Speaker:

the triumph of free speech?

Speaker:

Ro asks the questions she wants, Hanson gives the answers she wants, people get

Speaker:

to rail against it, being a podcast, Ro gets to change her mind and we

Speaker:

get to express our opinion about it.

Speaker:

I suppose.

Speaker:

It's working!

Speaker:

Yeah!

Speaker:

Like, at the end of the day, uh, Ro's free to make a decision and she's also

Speaker:

free to decide, shit, that didn't work with my audience, I'm gonna pull it.

Speaker:

The audience is free to say, that's a really shitty interview, and if you want

Speaker:

us to listen to your interviews in future, don't put this shitty interview stuff on,

Speaker:

and, uh, Pauline gets to say, Goddamnit.

Speaker:

Was it her audience, or was it a wider public?

Speaker:

Well Or political commentators?

Speaker:

Who will know?

Speaker:

I guess she saw the comments from people she perceived as her audience.

Speaker:

Was she clear about the aim of having her on?

Speaker:

What's the aim of Jessica Rowe's podcast?

Speaker:

Have constructive conversations?

Speaker:

Or talk about cooking or?

Speaker:

I don't know exactly.

Speaker:

But maybe she doesn't either.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, uh, well, in her tweet, telling people about her interview with Pauline

Speaker:

Hanson, she says, um, um, let's see.

Speaker:

So didn't talk anything about her life in politics, but delving into

Speaker:

her life outside of parliament.

Speaker:

And she talks, love raising kids and why she keeps going.

Speaker:

So, it's basically saying, a look at the human side rather than the

Speaker:

political side of Pauline Hanson.

Speaker:

I mean, I think it's as important as the book, The Banality of Evil.

Speaker:

Which is literally a history of the guy who ran the train lines.

Speaker:

In the Second World War.

Speaker:

Was it Hess or something like that?

Speaker:

No, no, no.

Speaker:

It was some civil servant who just ran the trains.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

The problem was the trains were full of Jews going to the concentration camp.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And it was how banal this job was.

Speaker:

And yet this man literally transported or was, yeah, involved in transporting

Speaker:

millions of people to their deaths.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Was that when he was in the dock at the Hague or whatever it was?

Speaker:

I thought that was what the banality of evil was about, was about that one of

Speaker:

the key, Goring or Hess or somebody No, no, no, I Was such an ordinary looking

Speaker:

character, banal, and was so evil.

Speaker:

Just looking at the man in the witness box, he just looked like Some dull

Speaker:

accountant, and it seemed incongruous that, um, he was something else.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

Anyway, Anyone in the chat room have an opinion on that one?

Speaker:

Let us know.

Speaker:

I kind of agree with Sean McCarth on this one.

Speaker:

Free speech, people can say stuff, people can complain about what people

Speaker:

say, and people can make decisions, and um, I really personally think

Speaker:

Pauline Hanson gets enough chance to,

Speaker:

Show her softer side on any number of times soon.

Speaker:

Um, Netball.

Speaker:

I don't think we've spoken about netball much on this podcast over the years.

Speaker:

Netball, here's my theory on netball.

Speaker:

If you were to invent netball today, you'd never get off first base.

Speaker:

Because creating a sport played on a hard ground, where people have to stop within

Speaker:

one step, is just It's just destined to create knee and ankle issues for

Speaker:

people, like it's, um, not a good idea.

Speaker:

So, anyway, Netball Queensland has been accused of turning, uh, its

Speaker:

own championships into a farce.

Speaker:

You want to tell me about Penalty of Evil?

Speaker:

No, uh, no.

Speaker:

Oh yeah, sorry, it's saying it's Eichmann in Jerusalem.

Speaker:

Oh right, okay.

Speaker:

So it was a Jewish, uh, reporter.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Who covered the trials.

Speaker:

Yeah, yep.

Speaker:

And essentially he was like an accountant and seemed quite ordinary.

Speaker:

Well, and saying the fact that he couldn't even string a sentence together.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And couldn't believe that this was the evil architect of destruction.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Well, there's a lot, you know, Pauline Hanson can hardly

Speaker:

string a sentence together.

Speaker:

The analogy's starting to work.

Speaker:

I'm starting to see the analogy here, Joe.

Speaker:

I'm starting to see it.

Speaker:

Okay, back to the netball.

Speaker:

So, um, Netball Queensland accused of turning its own

Speaker:

championships into a farce.

Speaker:

Essentially, they allowed an under 17 all boys team to compete.

Speaker:

In the Under 18s Championship, and the boys essentially thrashed them,

Speaker:

and the crowd got quite irate watching it, and nasty comments made from the

Speaker:

side, and, um, They don't have a state championship for boys due to player

Speaker:

numbers, so they won their seven games by an average of 29 goals, and the closest

Speaker:

contest came in the semifinals when they beat the opposition by 23 goals.

Speaker:

So, yeah.

Speaker:

Shay, any thoughts as a representative of women's netball?

Speaker:

Yeah, well, uh, I've been this height, which for the listeners is 172 centimeters

Speaker:

since I was about 13, and I've got very broad shoulders, so My parents had hoped

Speaker:

I'd be a swimmer, but I wasn't a swimmer.

Speaker:

So netball it was, so I was goal attack for like many years

Speaker:

representative and absolutely my knees and ankles are kaput as a result.

Speaker:

And um, I think the obvious solution is mixed netball.

Speaker:

There was a boys team played against my daughter, um, under 14s, I think.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

A couple of years ago.

Speaker:

Same age, signed to 14 boys against 7.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, and they play an incredibly different game.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

They, uh, it's just watching them, having watched girls play time and

Speaker:

time again, to watch an all boys team on the court was so different.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, they, Over a third, those types of rules, they, they, they were just, I

Speaker:

don't know, they, they were more physical.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And, and not pushing each other because it's a no contact, but, um,

Speaker:

they, they were more aggressive in the way that they went for the ball.

Speaker:

Um, they just played a very different game.

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

And it is, I don't know what the answer is because obviously they have to

Speaker:

be able and maybe as you say, mixed.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah, well certainly, uh, I always played with girls until I was 17

Speaker:

or 18 and then did Mixnet Ball.

Speaker:

And that was a hoot, you know, and it did actually sort of balance

Speaker:

the kind of physicality versus the, you know, um, practice technique

Speaker:

of women who'd played for years.

Speaker:

It seems like the obvious thing, having one boys team play against the girls.

Speaker:

I'm not sure that that is, you know, striving for equality.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

I, I think solutions could be.

Speaker:

Well, at least the girls team who made the final should have been declared the

Speaker:

netball champions for that year, like, should have got the trophy, perhaps.

Speaker:

Or, what they should do is maybe say to boys, You know, drop down three years.

Speaker:

Like you have to be under 15 boys against under 18 girls or something,

Speaker:

or whatever level you need to go down to make it a fairer contest.

Speaker:

Obviously didn't do that in this case.

Speaker:

Um, and really, or let the boys compete, but say, well, you don't

Speaker:

get to go into the final cause you can compete in this, but.

Speaker:

Um, uh, but you don't get to go into the finals, I don't know, but, um, maybe

Speaker:

just make him young enough so that it evens it up, but that was just crazy.

Speaker:

That's just crazy.

Speaker:

Do you think it'd still be appealing to boys with all

Speaker:

those extra limitations though?

Speaker:

Well, if, if, if it's only, well, it's, it's hardly appealing

Speaker:

if you're flogging people.

Speaker:

That must be a bit tough.

Speaker:

It's not, it's actually no fun in sport to be.

Speaker:

You know, I've played competitive squash for years, and if you're in

Speaker:

the wrong grade and you're killing everybody, there's no fun in that either.

Speaker:

So you want, and that's what they should learn.

Speaker:

So, um.

Speaker:

Yeah, I know that the professional teams play against men in their training.

Speaker:

Ah.

Speaker:

So the Firebirds and that will play against some men's

Speaker:

teams in their training.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

So, there we go.

Speaker:

We learn something every day.

Speaker:

I didn't know that you were a netballer.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And I'm happy that my theory on knees and ankles stood up.

Speaker:

It's perfect.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

I've also got a theory about netball referees.

Speaker:

Are they called referees or umpires?

Speaker:

Either is fine.

Speaker:

They're really wannabe Nazis.

Speaker:

Yeah, I never made a good umpire.

Speaker:

I never played I was all like, ah, let it go.

Speaker:

Oh, was it a step?

Speaker:

Yeah, and particularly you see netball.

Speaker:

I've never played mixed netball, but I did, I've watched a little bit with my

Speaker:

kids at different times, so this is cool.

Speaker:

Where there's guys who have obviously never played netball before, and they're

Speaker:

in a mixed team, and they've got that ungainliness about them, the umpire

Speaker:

will pull them up on a stepping core that just isn't there, because they just

Speaker:

don't like the look of this ungainly guy.

Speaker:

And they just love blowing that whistle.

Speaker:

They're shockers.

Speaker:

They love blowing the whistle.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

I think they take it upon themselves to be fair, like, especially for

Speaker:

the taller, leaner ones, because even though they are standing 1.

Speaker:

5 metres or whatever, 3 feet.

Speaker:

They look like they're up nice and close, so just, yeah, they'll take

Speaker:

it upon themselves to take their job very seriously as umpires.

Speaker:

Yeah, if I had a son who was looking to start a relationship with a

Speaker:

netball umpire, I'd be very worried.

Speaker:

I'd be warning him against it.

Speaker:

Um, in terms of the knees and ankles, hmm.

Speaker:

I believe it's the sudden stop.

Speaker:

It's the no, no traveling rule.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, that I heard from a physiologist is actually very, very hard.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And in fact, in professional netball, they have to learn how

Speaker:

to stop correctly so that they can stop without doing the damage.

Speaker:

Um, and it's the kids long term if they don't get that training

Speaker:

end up with major damage.

Speaker:

So I've played a bit of Frisbee, so Ultimate Disc Frisbee, and when you're

Speaker:

running and you catch the Frisbee, you are allowed to take three or four

Speaker:

minor steps, like just to pull up.

Speaker:

You don't have to do it.

Speaker:

Within two steps.

Speaker:

Like if you're running flat out in a certain direction, you catch the Frisbee.

Speaker:

You, uh, there's no rule about a precise number of steps

Speaker:

that you have to pull up in.

Speaker:

Um, it's just, you try and do it in what is a reasonable amount of pull ups time.

Speaker:

So.

Speaker:

I haven't seen that game.

Speaker:

There you go.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So you'll have to look that one up.

Speaker:

I will.

Speaker:

So you have to run.

Speaker:

It's, it's Parallel to each other or kind of like a field.

Speaker:

It's, it's like, um, how would you describe, people are spread out.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

And so there's no offside, so you can throw the frisbee way forward, um, and

Speaker:

when somebody catches it, they then throw the frisbee to somebody else way

Speaker:

forward, and you, and you score like a touchdown in an end zone is how you score.

Speaker:

Cool.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

This is a really good game.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

So, um, you catch the frisbee and take three or four or whatever necessary steps

Speaker:

depending on how fast you've been running.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

Right, um, There was an article, uh, in the Quarterly Essay by Lech Blaine,

Speaker:

and, um, I've got a bit of an edited extract here, so, um, Uh, it was

Speaker:

titled The Larrikin Myth, Class and Power, and he says, Scott Morrison, a

Speaker:

Pentecostal rugby union fan from the eastern suburbs of Sydney, plagiarised

Speaker:

the identity of men like my father.

Speaker:

The career politician reinvented himself as ScoMo, a rugby league loving

Speaker:

everyman from the Sutherland Shire.

Speaker:

Why would a white collar toff camouflage as working class?

Speaker:

For power, Australia is divided between cosmopolitans and parochials.

Speaker:

The cosmopolitans, well educated and affluent, are concentrated in

Speaker:

Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne.

Speaker:

Parochials are located on the fringes of cities and in the regions, and are far

Speaker:

less likely to have a university degree.

Speaker:

Professor Megan Davis says class is the last taboo.

Speaker:

Clever progressives buy into so many negative tropes about

Speaker:

poor and uneducated people.

Speaker:

And they would do it to no other group of marginalised people.

Speaker:

And this writer says, My brother John comes from the underclass.

Speaker:

In 1985, his biological parents were sent to Boggo Road Jail for kidnapping.

Speaker:

John was placed into foster care with my publican parents in Rosedale,

Speaker:

on the outskirts of Bundaberg.

Speaker:

University was never for him, he became an unskilled labourer

Speaker:

before working as a bartender.

Speaker:

John beat all the obstacles in life to become a successful car

Speaker:

salesman and a loving father.

Speaker:

Nobody in his social circle attended university.

Speaker:

Unlike our dad's generation of Labor voting larrikins,

Speaker:

John's vivid lived experience

Speaker:

John Howard deployed the symbols, values and vernacular of working class

Speaker:

culture to attract jilted battlers from Labor's blue collar base.

Speaker:

Scott Morrison won the 2019 election by pretending to be a Howard battler.

Speaker:

And his brother John says, every human being just wants to be respected, so when

Speaker:

you come across someone who doesn't judge how you look or talk and who doesn't

Speaker:

care if you have a university degree.

Speaker:

It's dead set one of the nicest feelings in the world and, um, says

Speaker:

here the contempty feels emanating from progressives isn't an anecdotal anomaly.

Speaker:

At the 2019 election, Labor attracted an average swing of 3.

Speaker:

78 percent in the 20 seats with the highest percentage

Speaker:

of university graduates.

Speaker:

So that was 3.

Speaker:

78 percent where there's the high percentage of university graduates.

Speaker:

In the 20 seats with the lowest percentage of university graduates,

Speaker:

Labor softened an average of 4.

Speaker:

2 swing against it.

Speaker:

I've never heard that statistic before.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

It's a really interesting one.

Speaker:

Mmm.

Speaker:

Really interesting.

Speaker:

I've heard similar coming from the UK.

Speaker:

Mmm.

Speaker:

That Labor has become a party of Social justice, um, and not the

Speaker:

working person, the working man.

Speaker:

So we've talked about this a lot over the years, but I'd never heard that statistic

Speaker:

for Australia, about, um, about that.

Speaker:

Um, there we go.

Speaker:

The 20 seats were the lowest percentage of university graduates and Labor

Speaker:

suffered a swing against it, 4.

Speaker:

2%.

Speaker:

Interesting.

Speaker:

That's really what Labor suffered.

Speaker:

They need to be very aware of that if they're going to win.

Speaker:

So um, he says here in this quarterly essay, Australia, a

Speaker:

nation of self proclaimed straight shooters has been hijacked by a

Speaker:

pack of fabricated lar larrikins and bona fide o bullshit artists.

Speaker:

I reckon that's right.

Speaker:

Um, uh, for a quarter of a century, Australia's conservative establishment

Speaker:

has profited from pitting working class battlers against the inner city elite.

Speaker:

Coal mines are a threat.

Speaker:

against universities, larrikins against feminists and gays, patriots against

Speaker:

aboriginals, muslims and asylum seekers.

Speaker:

So Howard and Morrison have successfully offered the coalition as the natural

Speaker:

home for parochials who want to cast a protest vote against the snobbery

Speaker:

of cosmopolitans and the question is what do progressives do next?

Speaker:

So lots of food for thought there, no disagreement from me and What

Speaker:

if they just abandoned workers?

Speaker:

Well, they did.

Speaker:

But, like But, I mean, have they?

Speaker:

I mean, frankly, you can probably, um, thank the unions for these six figure pay

Speaker:

salaries that the working people or, as this article goes on Historically These

Speaker:

people that do FIFOs and stuff, yeah?

Speaker:

Mm.

Speaker:

And that's been gradually being eroded by this casual contract

Speaker:

style thing instead of secure work.

Speaker:

So, if they're really, if they're really clear that they want to vote Liberal, and

Speaker:

Dominic Perrotais obviously and his, uh, and the federal government of Liberal,

Speaker:

are not appealing to the women's vote.

Speaker:

Then maybe that's what Labor does.

Speaker:

Wouldn't it be great if we had a party that was obviously

Speaker:

appealing to women's votes?

Speaker:

Yes, it would be great.

Speaker:

And aren't we 52 percent of the Australian population?

Speaker:

So, because Isn't, isn't it a fair, wouldn't it be a gamble?

Speaker:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

So, so what you're getting on to is the second part of this article from Crikey.

Speaker:

I'll talk about this and then we'll recycle back to where we are.

Speaker:

So, the second part from Crikey, so I looked at this article.

Speaker:

In the quarterly essay and said that, um, the structure of blue

Speaker:

collar workforce itself has changed with tradies at the vanguard.

Speaker:

So, over the past 30 years, many tradies have grown increasingly wealthy, likely

Speaker:

to operate small businesses, likely to own their investment properties.

Speaker:

So their interests no longer neatly align with collective labour as their

Speaker:

economic power rivals and sometimes exceeds that of white collar workers.

Speaker:

So, um, in this Crikey article it says, So should the left

Speaker:

give up on blue collar blokes?

Speaker:

Of course not.

Speaker:

Um, uh, many remain poorly paid, vulnerable to injury,

Speaker:

dependent on dodgy bosses.

Speaker:

Um, and winning over some of this cohort is an electoral necessity.

Speaker:

So, um, so Labor needs to win them over.

Speaker:

But in 2021, the average union member is a tertiary educated female teacher or nurse.

Speaker:

And the most economically disadvantaged group in Australian society is

Speaker:

single moms on welfare thinking.

Speaker:

The nostalgically to the hard hat and steel-cut boots wearing working man of

Speaker:

the 20th century warps one sense of who is now the most deserving of political favor.

Speaker:

So, uh, that sort of catches up with what you were saying.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So, um, well just.

Speaker:

That Perrette picture, with him in the bar, drinking the beer, trying

Speaker:

to do the scamo, I'm a man of the people, I go to the pub, drinking beer.

Speaker:

Wouldn't surprise me if it's the first time he's ever been in the pub.

Speaker:

Like, with six kids, hardline Catholic, workaholic, no doubt, all the rest of it.

Speaker:

Like, that guy would be Workaholic, because he doesn't want to

Speaker:

be at home with the six kids.

Speaker:

Well Uh, so he's looked at that image, like these politicians trying to build

Speaker:

themselves up as the working man, but, um, it's an interesting conundrum, isn't it?

Speaker:

That there's this shift where, uh, if you were to look at a well educated

Speaker:

white collar in a city's suburban, you, you, who's, who's not particularly

Speaker:

wealthy, you know, yet, you know, then they're probably going to vote Labor.

Speaker:

Um, once they've accumulated wealth, they'll then swap to the Liberals.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, and, but yeah, if you look at a roughest guts guy in a fluoro vest, uh,

Speaker:

You don't know what he's gonna vote, because he could be driving a 150, 000

Speaker:

Land Cruiser with a boat and a shed and a whole bunch of other things, like, he

Speaker:

could be doing really well for himself and considers himself a small businessman

Speaker:

and And the Liberal Party is his home.

Speaker:

Um, and I don't think Labor's worked out any of this stuff yet.

Speaker:

The Liberals have worked it out to some extent.

Speaker:

They've stopped late.

Speaker:

Give John Howard something.

Speaker:

Howard stole that.

Speaker:

Those Howard battlers.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Howard grabbed them.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And Labor's been trying to counter that ever since.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And given that statistic on the last election, Labor's certainly failed to

Speaker:

connect with that group of I thought, yeah, um, last election, uh, Work Choices

Speaker:

was the last major win I think they had.

Speaker:

Yes, yes.

Speaker:

So, um, so yeah, so that was that.

Speaker:

Um, so we can't just abandon them.

Speaker:

We'd need the numbers.

Speaker:

You've gotta tell a story that resonates with these people.

Speaker:

So, um, uh, I think the biggest,

Speaker:

the biggest driver at the moment, the biggest hole that I see.

Speaker:

is the coalition have a story of mining jobs and Labour and the Greens just do

Speaker:

not, there's a lot of scaremongering about the loss of, uh, rural jobs.

Speaker:

And so Labour and the Greens need to come up with a, this is our

Speaker:

plan for, uh, regional Australia.

Speaker:

This is what we're going to replace mining with.

Speaker:

This is the future.

Speaker:

Jump on board, get on with us, and we will create a new economy that's

Speaker:

not based on digging shit out of the ground, that is the future.

Speaker:

Yeah, but people could look at past experience with the auto workers and

Speaker:

whatever else that we had with, when we had manufacturing or, and And,

Speaker:

well, we're not going to support the car industry, but there'll be

Speaker:

other work for you, don't worry.

Speaker:

And then, there really wasn't the work there.

Speaker:

But rather than making a promise of, there'll be other work for you,

Speaker:

don't worry, is This is the work.

Speaker:

We are going to fund it.

Speaker:

This is the infrastructure we're going to put in place.

Speaker:

Because people would be rightfully distrustful and say, you

Speaker:

abandoned us for globalization.

Speaker:

Essentially, that's what the Tony Blair, the Third Way, you know, and the Left

Speaker:

jumped onto globalization and said, Well, we'll re-skill our low-skill people

Speaker:

and find them other jobs to do coding software and making computer games.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

And none of that happened.

Speaker:

So people are going, well, I want hang on for dear life to this coal job because

Speaker:

I don't believe you, I don't Yeah.

Speaker:

Believe you for a second that you're gonna find me an

Speaker:

alternative solar farm to work on.

Speaker:

Like, so they, and, and so there's the, I don't trust you about the alternative job.

Speaker:

And there's also.

Speaker:

We've mentioned before about, uh, Hillary and the deplorables, where there's this

Speaker:

looking down the nose of people who are uneducated and have these very provoked,

Speaker:

uh, parochial views or whatever, and considering them deplorables, so.

Speaker:

But the same with Brexit, you know, if you're worried about immigration, if

Speaker:

you're worried about people coming in and stealing your job, then you're a racist.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Rather than, I understand your fears, they're misplaced and this is why,

Speaker:

but not just treating people as social pariahs because they are afraid.

Speaker:

And are we doing that here?

Speaker:

Um, good point.

Speaker:

So nobody's come out from the Labor side and said, You guys

Speaker:

are a bunch of deplorables.

Speaker:

Oh, I don't know.

Speaker:

I I got the feeling the greens with their trip up north of the last election.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

That's, was was a big up yours to the, to the mining communities.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

And certainly, so I wouldn't say a leader of the Labor Party has referred to the

Speaker:

uneducated class as deplorables, but maybe there's enough rub off of other people

Speaker:

saying, who are educated and saying, well, if you don't believe in climate

Speaker:

change by now, you're a frigging idiot.

Speaker:

Like, like it would be enough.

Speaker:

Of just that class, which is what the quarterly essay says, is that the educated

Speaker:

left would never diss a black person, a gay person, um, a disabled person,

Speaker:

but a dumb hick from the regions who doesn't believe in climate change, well,

Speaker:

they're a dumb hick from the regions who don't believe in climate change, they'd

Speaker:

be a much more readily disliked class.

Speaker:

Willing to insult them.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

. So, eh, um, I dunno.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

I saw a, a thing from UQ talking about biodiesel.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

. And said we could grow our diesel on shore.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

We could do this in the regions.

Speaker:

We could literally turn the coal mining areas into large farms of biodiesel.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Which would imply all these workers.

Speaker:

It's an engineering job.

Speaker:

It's a similar skill set.

Speaker:

It's not a direct replacement, but effectively we're still creating fuel.

Speaker:

We're still, yeah, it's very much the same.

Speaker:

It's a primary industry.

Speaker:

Yeah, I think there are the jobs there to swap those coal miners over into, but I

Speaker:

fully understand that they don't trust And I think we need to put our money where our

Speaker:

mouths are and say, this is the future.

Speaker:

We are going to invest heavily in it.

Speaker:

This is not just a, there will be jobs, a vague promise, but some serious, right.

Speaker:

This is what we see as our strategy.

Speaker:

This is the investment we're going to make.

Speaker:

Uh, these are the commitments.

Speaker:

Now the question is, is it a core commitment or a non core commitment?

Speaker:

And you know, the problem is, if, uh, if all the renewables is being

Speaker:

done by private enterprise, then it's hard for government to guarantee

Speaker:

where any of this is going to happen.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So I think they've got to grab guys like Twiggy Forrest with

Speaker:

his hydrogen thing of plant or whatever and say to some district,

Speaker:

well, it's going to be right here.

Speaker:

That's where it's going.

Speaker:

You move off there, you come into here.

Speaker:

So yeah, people need to see some specifics because they rightfully don't trust

Speaker:

this magical job that's going to appear.

Speaker:

Mm hmm.

Speaker:

And if we get in correctly at the base level.

Speaker:

We can tax it so that all the profits aren't going to

Speaker:

a big multinational offshore.

Speaker:

And then I just need to say to people, Scomo is a bullshit artist.

Speaker:

He is not one of you.

Speaker:

He is actually screwing you over.

Speaker:

He's taking money from you.

Speaker:

And, and your tribe, and he's given it to those arseholes, um,

Speaker:

in the finance world and wherever.

Speaker:

So don't believe what he's saying.

Speaker:

He's not on your side.

Speaker:

Not only is he university educated, but it was a free university education.

Speaker:

Was it for him, yes.

Speaker:

Almost certainly.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Um, so yeah, people need to understand you can't trust him.

Speaker:

He's not one of you.

Speaker:

He's just a bullshitter.

Speaker:

Don't fall for it.

Speaker:

Here's what he's done.

Speaker:

Um, Yeah, but he doesn't hold the hose.

Speaker:

No, exactly.

Speaker:

That's right.

Speaker:

But Lotus just doesn't want to try and sell a story.

Speaker:

It's all small target.

Speaker:

As much as you say about the Mad Monk and the Budgie Smugglers,

Speaker:

at least he did hold the hose.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Let's see in the chat room.

Speaker:

Um, uh,

Speaker:

Oh, it's too hard for me to read them in, but good on you Bronwyn

Speaker:

and everyone in there who's going for all of those commentary.

Speaker:

So yeah, that's still, we've mentioned it before, we've talked about the deplorables

Speaker:

a lot and it's obviously still a Labor problem based on those statistics on

Speaker:

the 20 seats at the bottom end and top end of, of university education and the

Speaker:

way they went for and against Labor.

Speaker:

That's a real concern, but it happened.

Speaker:

With the pandemic, there's a small chance that there's been more division again.

Speaker:

Um, One of my uncles, who shall remain nameless, has been a One

Speaker:

Nation voter for many years.

Speaker:

Uh, but he also, um, loves the rabbitos and it seems like a

Speaker:

long bow, but hang in there.

Speaker:

I'm with you here.

Speaker:

So he lives in Greenway and he got to see, he got to see his beloved

Speaker:

rabbitos obviously lose, but play a grand final here in Brisbane.

Speaker:

And I will be looking forward to my next interaction with

Speaker:

him to basically find out.

Speaker:

If with all this COVID pe Cause he's quite a sensible man apart

Speaker:

from his normal political leanings.

Speaker:

And all this COVID stuff, he probably would have got the shits with it.

Speaker:

And then, with that extra, like, um, So here's what I'm trying to say.

Speaker:

There's a, uh, theme of xenophobia around one of my uncles, which I think might've

Speaker:

translated around the border controls.

Speaker:

So keeping us safe, keeping the people out and then getting to watch the rabidos.

Speaker:

He might now be a Labor voter.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Because Palaszczuk was a pretty xenophobic about southerners.

Speaker:

She was keeping our borders safe.

Speaker:

I just think might, that's labor, just needs might be labor just

Speaker:

needs to be more xenophobic.

Speaker:

Well, wasn't, I just think there might be a little bit more, um, a little bit more

Speaker:

division and it's not, not, may, maybe not as simple as this anymore, right.

Speaker:

Maybe.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

I'm an optimist.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Well, hang on.

Speaker:

Wasn't it labor fed?

Speaker:

The Pacific solution Labor has been.

Speaker:

Fair, not, not quite, but almost as bad as the liberals in terms of border control.

Speaker:

Uh, in what, what's labor said about border control?

Speaker:

Oh, historically.

Speaker:

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

In terms of, um, both people and stuff.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Not a, yeah, not, not a piece of paper between them.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Very.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

'cause they weren't prepared to argue.

Speaker:

Maybe they just believed it as well, but like with all issues, it just

Speaker:

seems to be a small target where they didn't want to, well, I think it was,

Speaker:

they couldn't sell it, so they didn't want to fight it very, uh, yeah.

Speaker:

It was a gut reaction for a lot of people.

Speaker:

Stopping the immigrants, stopping the boat people.

Speaker:

Mm-Hmm.

Speaker:

. Yep.

Speaker:

It, it wasn't a thought out.

Speaker:

And I'm sure Labor went, you know what, we're not going to be able

Speaker:

to persuade people on this one.

Speaker:

Let's just roll over because we're just going to lose votes and

Speaker:

we're not going to pick any up.

Speaker:

So it's, it's a vote loser.

Speaker:

So we're out of here when it comes to this argument.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

Essentially.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

Um, tough times for Labor ahead, um, but if they could just

Speaker:

sell a story, it would be easy.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Just, uh.

Speaker:

Sorry, go ahead.

Speaker:

I was just going to say, there's one really great thing about

Speaker:

Western Australia and that's the, Rupert doesn't own the paper there.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And they really love Mark.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

And they're, yeah, so I think, um, Labor could do well there.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Okay.

Speaker:

Labor could do well there.

Speaker:

They could do well enough there that the rest of the country doesn't matter.

Speaker:

That would be refreshing, a newspaper not run by Yes.

Speaker:

When you get it, you're like.

Speaker:

I'm reading the news.

Speaker:

That's why it's such a stark contrast.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

It's just like, yeah.

Speaker:

I mean, I've been subscribed to the Career Mail and The Australian.

Speaker:

I read The Guardian.

Speaker:

I read ABC News.

Speaker:

You almost burst out laughing reading the Murdoch stuff.

Speaker:

Just look at the headlines.

Speaker:

I read Spectator as well.

Speaker:

And.

Speaker:

New York Times, like, but honestly, you nearly burst out laughing, just, uh, you

Speaker:

know, there's a disaster in New South Wales with, with, um, Gladys, and we just

Speaker:

get a headline trying to poke something at Palaszczuk because she announced

Speaker:

herself as the Olympics minister or something simple, like, they're just so

Speaker:

detached from the reality, it is a joke.

Speaker:

But conversely, did you hear about the Mega battery fire in New South Wales.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

So there's a You remember the South Australia battery?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

There's another one being built in New South Wales and one of the

Speaker:

battery packs caught fire Right.

Speaker:

Major fire.

Speaker:

None of the national papers.

Speaker:

Never saw anything about it.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

It's like How?

Speaker:

Yeah, exactly You'd think that the murder press would have

Speaker:

picked up and run with that.

Speaker:

Hmm No, I didn't see it.

Speaker:

No, I was shocked.

Speaker:

So what's also happened with Murdoch is they've done a 180 on climate change.

Speaker:

It's such an astounding 180.

Speaker:

The Courier Mail and all Murdoch papers during the week had this sort of six

Speaker:

page lift out wraparound of the normal paper, which was essentially Well, of

Speaker:

course climate change is real and it's man made and we need to do stuff about

Speaker:

it and, you know, zero emissions by 2050, of course, and, and But did they say

Speaker:

how they were getting to zero emissions?

Speaker:

Well, I think from memory they really liked the Twiggy Forest hydrogen

Speaker:

thing, so I think that was one of them.

Speaker:

So, two things I heard.

Speaker:

One is carbon capture and storage, and the other one is hydrogen is great, but

Speaker:

it's blue hydrogen not green hydrogen.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

What's that mean?

Speaker:

And the difference is, green hydrogen is you take your renewable

Speaker:

energy when you're not using it.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So when the sun is shining, but people aren't using their air conditioners or

Speaker:

when the wind is blowing, but nobody's got their TVs on or whatever and you

Speaker:

crack water, you split water into hydrogen and oxygen and that's how you

Speaker:

get your hydrogen, blue hydrogen, you take fossil fuels, gas and you put it

Speaker:

through a chemical reaction with more fossil fuels powering that reaction

Speaker:

and at the end of it you get hydrogen that's been created by fossil fuels.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So you can create the hydrogen either with renewable energy or fossil fuel energy.

Speaker:

And at the moment, blue hydrogen is cheaper than green hydrogen.

Speaker:

Right, yep.

Speaker:

So So anyway, I think, who knows what's going on with Murdoch and who knows

Speaker:

where it will end up, but there's just this amazing 180 where essentially

Speaker:

it seems to me that the rest of the world is really saying to Australia,

Speaker:

we're going to stop dealing with you, like, when it comes to trade agreements

Speaker:

with the EU, until you guys get your emissions targets where we want them,

Speaker:

you're becoming a bit of a pariah state.

Speaker:

So I think.

Speaker:

From that point of view, they've come to the party, we have to do something, and,

Speaker:

um, I think that's part of, it's a little bit like South Africa with sanctions and

Speaker:

apartheid, like eventually the rest of the world shamed them into it to some extent.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

I think we've almost reached that point where business leaders are now saying,

Speaker:

okay, I guess we have to do it because if we want to sell our shit to the EU and

Speaker:

places like that, and the noises Biden's making, it's time for us to come on board.

Speaker:

Seems to be.

Speaker:

My understanding is it's just one stat.

Speaker:

Yeah, and it's all talk and it's obviously going to be very

Speaker:

favourable of large, um, ventures.

Speaker:

The sort of thing that Twiggy Forest and others would want to

Speaker:

do, large centralised ventures.

Speaker:

So, um.

Speaker:

Yeah, well, don't trust him for a minute as being genuine in it, and he could be

Speaker:

trying to obscure things to bring about a blue, um, hydrogen rather than a green

Speaker:

one, wouldn't surprise him the least.

Speaker:

But in any event, still a turnaround just to acknowledge Uh, actually,

Speaker:

yeah, it is man made, and yeah, we need zero emissions, and there

Speaker:

were nowhere near that before.

Speaker:

But, but I think this is just, this is the game plan.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Is, is fight every step.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

In your rearward action.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Until you've sweated all your assets as much as you can.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

You've dug as much coal out of the ground as you possibly can, and, and

Speaker:

fight every step of the way back.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, um, so just, how much time we got?

Speaker:

We got just a little bit longer?

Speaker:

Yeah, you're okay?

Speaker:

You're all good?

Speaker:

While we're still on that sort of climate change thing, so

Speaker:

just climate change acceptance.

Speaker:

So the essential report came out today, so you wouldn't have seen this before,

Speaker:

but the question was of Australians Um, Do you believe there is fairly conclusive

Speaker:

evidence that climate change is happening and is caused by human activity, or do

Speaker:

you believe that the evidence is still not in and we may just be witnessing

Speaker:

a normal fluctuation in the Earth's climate, which happens from time to time?

Speaker:

So, dear listener, uh, climate change is happening and is

Speaker:

caused by human activity, 59%?

Speaker:

As opposed to we are just witnessing a normal fluctuation

Speaker:

in the Earth's climate, 30%?

Speaker:

That's not good.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Don't know is 11%.

Speaker:

That's a, yep.

Speaker:

That's not good.

Speaker:

But you know what, like, I ran through it in our climate change episode and none of

Speaker:

that stuff you will read in newspapers.

Speaker:

No.

Speaker:

Or magazines.

Speaker:

You have to buy a book.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Or listen to a podcast.

Speaker:

You actually have to read a proper book or a podcast.

Speaker:

Or some long form podcast to get that information.

Speaker:

You don't get it in a newspaper or a magazine article.

Speaker:

So, um, so once you see it, it's obvious.

Speaker:

I think all you need to do is read the, um, the Exxon papers from the early 80s.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

So it was the Exxon scientists or the Shell, one of the huge oil companies,

Speaker:

that were going climate change is real, we need to do something about this.

Speaker:

And by the time we got to the executives, they decided what they were going

Speaker:

to do about it, which was deny it.

Speaker:

And pretend that it didn't happen.

Speaker:

And then cook the books.

Speaker:

And then cook the books.

Speaker:

And take Arthur Anderson down with them.

Speaker:

Yeah, but it was the whole, uh, you know.

Speaker:

The scientists themselves working for the oil companies.

Speaker:

So it's not that science isn't settled.

Speaker:

The scientists working for these companies 30, 40 years ago

Speaker:

knew that this was happening.

Speaker:

This is just muddying the waters.

Speaker:

But, you know, what I presented in that podcast, I mean, you've

Speaker:

heard every newspaper I access.

Speaker:

None of that was in there.

Speaker:

I had to go and buy a book and read about it.

Speaker:

So, or a long form podcast of some sort would probably do it UQ did, uh, what's

Speaker:

called Denial101x, which is a short, free course run by the university,

Speaker:

uh, which is, uh, how do we know that the Earth's climate is changing?

Speaker:

How do we know that humans are causing it?

Speaker:

And why do people deny that it's true?

Speaker:

And it's, as well, it's the psychology.

Speaker:

So it does talk about how we know that it's changing and how we know it's us.

Speaker:

But what's really interesting is the political reasoning behind,

Speaker:

the psychological reasoning behind.

Speaker:

Tribal allegiances.

Speaker:

Absolutely.

Speaker:

Speaking of tribal allegiances, just in the breakdown of that, uh, That 30 percent

Speaker:

who said we're just watching normal fluctuations, um, the older you are,

Speaker:

the more likely you are to think that.

Speaker:

And also, if you're a coalition voter, the more likely you are to think that.

Speaker:

So 39 percent of coalition voters think that it's just normal,

Speaker:

cyclical warming of the earth.

Speaker:

Only 23 percent of Labor, only 15 percent of Greens.

Speaker:

15 percent of Greens think that.

Speaker:

Wow, that's a worry, isn't it?

Speaker:

I got a great phone call while I was in quarantine.

Speaker:

Um, my friend's mum rang me.

Speaker:

She's just like, Had enough of, of little action.

Speaker:

All right.

Speaker:

So, and her, um, she lives in, um, for your listeners, she lives in the

Speaker:

neighboring suburb of Barton, which is a really beauty, beautiful, leafy suburb.

Speaker:

So on Thursday we're meeting for coffee and we're going to start an interest

Speaker:

group and then we're just going to try, I don't know, plant trees.

Speaker:

We don't actually know what we're going to do yet, but we're just

Speaker:

going to start doing something.

Speaker:

And then.

Speaker:

Hopefully build, build momentum.

Speaker:

Very good.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

There might be a trade group already.

Speaker:

I, it would, you would think so.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

It might be even just, I've, I've Googled it, but I haven't found

Speaker:

anyone specifically for Barden, but maybe in neighboring areas.

Speaker:

There is for the Gap.

Speaker:

Is there?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

If she wants to go to Taylor Range tomorrow, Wednesday night at 7.

Speaker:

30, there's a meeting of sort of Gap people for doing that sort of stuff.

Speaker:

Cool.

Speaker:

There you go.

Speaker:

It's close enough.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And I live in the Gap, so if you plant some more trees and make it beautiful.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Or there'll be people who know about stuff in Barden, so.

Speaker:

Exactly.

Speaker:

Perfect.

Speaker:

Thanks.

Speaker:

There you go.

Speaker:

That's good.

Speaker:

Um, addressing climate change.

Speaker:

Are we doing enough?

Speaker:

Are we doing too much or not doing enough?

Speaker:

Um, do you think Australia is doing enough, not enough or too much?

Speaker:

Or just climate change?

Speaker:

Not doing enough, 42%, doing enough, 31%, doing too much, 15%.

Speaker:

So either doing enough or doing too much.

Speaker:

How can doing fuck all be doing too much?

Speaker:

I mean, seriously, so either doing enough or doing too much is 46 percent

Speaker:

as opposed to not doing enough 42%.

Speaker:

More people think we're doing either enough or too much, but not enough.

Speaker:

Who is the more, uh, male and female is fairly even.

Speaker:

Obviously, young people are saying not doing enough, I think.

Speaker:

Well, but they're also saying doing too much, uh.

Speaker:

Younger people, 18 to 34 group, doing too much is 19%, whereas the 55 year age

Speaker:

group is saying doing too much is only 9%.

Speaker:

That's weird.

Speaker:

So the younger you are, the more likely you are to say doing too much.

Speaker:

Hmm.

Speaker:

And of course, uh, oh, now it's getting just bizarre.

Speaker:

Green.

Speaker:

Greens.

Speaker:

Green voters.

Speaker:

Doing too much, 18%.

Speaker:

And doing enough, 17%.

Speaker:

So if Greens vote it's 35 percent either doing enough or not.

Speaker:

I reckon some of these people are just trolling themselves with Greens voters.

Speaker:

They're just pulling their leg now.

Speaker:

I apologise to you, listener, for presenting this, this surely

Speaker:

bullshit study from the Central Poll, because that's just wacky.

Speaker:

I'd hate not to.

Speaker:

That's just, that's just wacky.

Speaker:

Speaking of wacky, Keith Pitt, Resources Minister.

Speaker:

He wants Australia, the government, to provide a 250 billion loan

Speaker:

facility for the mining sector in return for a commitment to net zero.

Speaker:

A 250 billion loan.

Speaker:

So, um For where they couldn't get a private loan because those

Speaker:

political advocate, uh, activists are forcing banks not to lend money.

Speaker:

Correct.

Speaker:

Banks are not lending to fossil fuel companies anymore.

Speaker:

It's nothing to do with the fact that fossil fuel is actually

Speaker:

not economically viable.

Speaker:

And the investors are worried they won't get their money back.

Speaker:

It's all those political activists.

Speaker:

And the free market capitalists of the coalition want to tell,

Speaker:

um, the market what to do.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So, 250 billion is about one eighth of Australia's GDP.

Speaker:

Um, Pitt's office was unable to tell Crikey how it came up with the 250

Speaker:

billion figure, and we asked Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce to explain.

Speaker:

But he said it's a matter for Pitt.

Speaker:

That's a mistake.

Speaker:

Is that Pitt the Younger?

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, I had a friend who commented on the, um, I can't remember which particular

Speaker:

scandal it was, but, um, he said he was Unimpressed by the way it worked

Speaker:

and I said it worked perfectly because the LNP's aim is to transfer public

Speaker:

funds into the pockets of their rich mates, their party donors, and in

Speaker:

that case it worked perfectly well.

Speaker:

It did what it was supposed to do.

Speaker:

Yeah, they're the greatest socialists.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Nationals.

Speaker:

Yep.

Speaker:

So, um, so David Littleproud has demanded the banking system be destabilised

Speaker:

by withdrawing deposit guarantees for banks that refuse to fund coal projects.

Speaker:

And Matt Canavan wants every Australian mortgage holder to pay what would

Speaker:

be in effect a coal tax by locking out banks that refuse to invest in

Speaker:

coal, thus driving up interest rates.

Speaker:

These guys are completely nuts.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Um, there you go.

Speaker:

That's part of that deplorables thing where we talk about

Speaker:

guilty, but they are nuts.

Speaker:

What can you do when they are?

Speaker:

They are.

Speaker:

And how come, like, that's not going to suit mortgage holders at all?

Speaker:

Coal workers, is it?

Speaker:

Surely not!

Speaker:

Crazy thought bubbles from some maniacs who we've actually got in charge of stuff.

Speaker:

This is Resources Minister, Keith Pitt.

Speaker:

I'm really frightening.

Speaker:

It's Agricultural Minister, David Littleproud.

Speaker:

These are ministers!

Speaker:

It's, it's the politicians who are so keen to prop up a single

Speaker:

industry in their electorates.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

Rather than working on diversity.

Speaker:

Yes.

Speaker:

So that 250 billion, um, according to the Reserve Bank in, uh, from

Speaker:

three years ago, the current level of replacement capital expenditure, that

Speaker:

is, how much investment is needed to continue to dig up the same amount that

Speaker:

is currently being produced, is around 10 billion for a five year period.

Speaker:

So Pitt's quarter trillion facility would guarantee 125

Speaker:

years of replacement investment.

Speaker:

In both coal and iron ore on current spending levels.

Speaker:

125 years of replacement investment.

Speaker:

It's just completely nuts that these guys are in charge.

Speaker:

Goodness me.

Speaker:

So, um Is this Matt appearing in some photographs with some coal dust sprinkled

Speaker:

on my face so I look like a miner?

Speaker:

Yes, that's it.

Speaker:

With the fluoro vest on.

Speaker:

That's it, yep.

Speaker:

Uh, just quickly, while we're still on energy, uh, and climate stuff, nuclear.

Speaker:

So, a couple of polls have come out.

Speaker:

Truly minucular.

Speaker:

Nuclear.

Speaker:

Nuclear.

Speaker:

Nuclear?

Speaker:

Question, um, from News Poll.

Speaker:

The US or UK will supply the nuclear propulsion system to power the

Speaker:

submarines, and Australia has not committed to developing a homegrown

Speaker:

nuclear industry in the future, do you think Australia should develop its

Speaker:

own domestic civil nuclear industry, including new nuclear power stations

Speaker:

in Australia to generate electricity?

Speaker:

Um, definitely 25% should consider 36%, no, 27% don't know.

Speaker:

12.

Speaker:

So either definitely or should consider was.

Speaker:

61%.

Speaker:

That's a lot of people in favour of nuclear.

Speaker:

There was another poll out by Essential, who I now don't trust at all based

Speaker:

on what we were talking about before.

Speaker:

Uh, To what extent do you support or oppose Australia's developing

Speaker:

nuclear power plants for the generation of electricity?

Speaker:

And total support was 50%.

Speaker:

Opposition was 32%.

Speaker:

Unsure, 18%.

Speaker:

So still quite supportive of nuclear.

Speaker:

Energy.

Speaker:

Um, it'd be great to put some of these people to a test as

Speaker:

to their actual knowledge.

Speaker:

Article from the Spectator I'll put in the show notes, which I'm actually only

Speaker:

just providing to the Patreons these days, so if you want the full show

Speaker:

notes, you have to become a Patreon.

Speaker:

So, um, article from the Spectator saying we need to have nuclear, but I came

Speaker:

across a very interesting article by Bob Carr, former New South Wales Premier

Speaker:

and former Federal Foreign Minister.

Speaker:

So, talking about nuclear, this is good.

Speaker:

Um, the industry, the nuclear industry, lacks a single example in a western

Speaker:

country of a new power plant being built remotely on time and budget.

Speaker:

According to World Nuclear Industry Status Report, 94 plants were

Speaker:

to come online across the next decade, but 98 get decommissioned.

Speaker:

Yet 48 of those to be built are to be in China.

Speaker:

Remove them and that leaves 46 coming online.

Speaker:

With the stubborn fact that 98 are being decommissioned in the rest of the world.

Speaker:

So excluding China, 46 coming, 98 going.

Speaker:

In 2019, for the first time, renewable sources excluding hydro

Speaker:

generated more power than nuclear.

Speaker:

In Australia, nuclear attracts not the remotest investor interest.

Speaker:

If nuclear were an option, a merchant bank or superannuation fund might

Speaker:

be maneuvering to own the space.

Speaker:

They might have formed a consortium with a miner and a construction company or

Speaker:

two with a brace of lobbyists at work.

Speaker:

It's not happening.

Speaker:

The contrast with the surge to renewables is stark.

Speaker:

Andrew Forrest and Mike Cannon Brooks are prepared to put their own

Speaker:

funds into a vast solar farm in the Northern Territory and Forrest to

Speaker:

make a huge commitment to hydrogen.

Speaker:

There is no single investor with a comparable zeal for nuclear

Speaker:

power, either high net worth or Individual or institution.

Speaker:

So he says, I argued for a pro nuclear case within the Labor Party

Speaker:

and scorned what I saw as the left's phobia against the nuclear option.

Speaker:

And this is Bob Carr saying, I thought coal more destructive and nuclear the

Speaker:

bridge to the era of new renewables.

Speaker:

But now it's clear that nuclear is lumbering, subject to breakdowns

Speaker:

and is crippling expensive.

Speaker:

New renewable sources such as wind and solar increased by 184 gigawatts.

Speaker:

Nuclear only grew by 2.

Speaker:

4.

Speaker:

Number of reactors has barely changed since the 80s.

Speaker:

Um, France was the poster child.

Speaker:

Here's an interesting bit.

Speaker:

Poor reliability plagues the fleet.

Speaker:

This is a fleet of nuclear reactors.

Speaker:

On any day, at least four plants are at zero output because of technical failures.

Speaker:

The average per plant is a month per year at zero production.

Speaker:

So one of the great arguments for nuclear is it's reliable,

Speaker:

consistent baseload energy.

Speaker:

But in France, the average per plant is a month per year at zero production.

Speaker:

Yeah, but there is one constant he hasn't factored in.

Speaker:

Uh, Uranium for nuclear weapons.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

That's the main reason for running nuclear power stations.

Speaker:

Ah, to generate the uranium for Yeah.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Ah, good point.

Speaker:

That, that's, that's Is that where you get, that's where you get it from?

Speaker:

That's the major reason for running, um, nuclear power plants.

Speaker:

Is that right?

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

As a waste material from the nuclear power, from the No, other way.

Speaker:

So the material, once it's gone through the reactor core, um, Is

Speaker:

then perfect as a nuclear weapon.

Speaker:

Is more suitable to be put into weapons.

Speaker:

There you go.

Speaker:

Not even a Scandinavian deficiency can provide a happy pro nuclear narrative.

Speaker:

Finland became the first country in Western Europe to order a new

Speaker:

nuclear reactor since 1988, but it's running 13 years late, plagued with

Speaker:

management and quality control issues, bankruptcies and investor withdrawals.

Speaker:

Who could have the faintest confidence that Australia could

Speaker:

throw up a nuclear reactor with more panache, um, than the Finns?

Speaker:

Um, doing big complex projects is hardly an Australian competitive edge.

Speaker:

Think of the submarines contract.

Speaker:

So there we go.

Speaker:

I didn't know that about the unreliability of nuclear.

Speaker:

I knew it's high cost and whatnot, but there you go.

Speaker:

Yeah, so it's, it's, my understanding is it doesn't financially work.

Speaker:

And the real reason for building and keeping the power plants running is

Speaker:

most of the countries with a nuclear reactor also have nuclear weapons.

Speaker:

There you go.

Speaker:

Right.

Speaker:

Well, we will and truly kept you out of the Shark Tank, Shane, for another week.

Speaker:

I'll be on my own next week.

Speaker:

I'm going to talk about Less is More by Jason Hickle.

Speaker:

How degrowth will save the world.

Speaker:

Excellent history of capitalism and economics.

Speaker:

Really, part of understanding the world is understanding political systems,

Speaker:

power, and economics, and climate, and he's got a lot of it all wrapped up

Speaker:

into a neat little theory and package.

Speaker:

So, so that's the plan for next week.

Speaker:

And then the panel, Still waiting to hear on the court case.

Speaker:

Um, don't know, haven't had a decision yet.

Speaker:

Fingers crossed.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

Uh, if you're anywhere, you've got any chance of being in Noosa

Speaker:

on the 30th, um, think about that as an interesting experience.

Speaker:

Um, we've got to apply for a protest permit.

Speaker:

So, hopefully that Is smooth sailing?

Speaker:

I mean, who wouldn't want a bunch of satanic protesters in Hastings Street?

Speaker:

On a Sunday night, is it bring your own goat?

Speaker:

So I dunno that we'll be having goats.

Speaker:

Um, could bless a goat I suppose.

Speaker:

But, um, yeah.

Speaker:

So anyway, keep that in mind.

Speaker:

Let us know if you're gonna go.

Speaker:

Alright, well until then, um, talk to you next week.

Speaker:

Bye for now.

Speaker:

Thanks.

Speaker:

Good night and has a good night from him.

Speaker:

Well, you probably wonder what our politicians do on Christmas Eve.

Speaker:

Well, when it's drought, they eat cattle.

Speaker:

Now, you don't have to convince me that the climate's not changing.

Speaker:

It is changing.

Speaker:

And my problem has always been whether you believe a new tax

Speaker:

is going to change it back.

Speaker:

Look, I just don't want the government anymore in my life.

Speaker:

I'm sick of the government being in my life.

Speaker:

Yeah.

Speaker:

And the other thing is, I think we've got to acknowledge is, you know, there's

Speaker:

a higher authority that's beyond our comprehension and right up there in

Speaker:

the sky, unless we understand, uh, that that's got to be respected, then we're

Speaker:

just fools and we're going to get nailed.

Chapters

Video

More from YouTube