{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2F351beb1f-7791-4908-b156-5e489b40c51d","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 200px;\" title=\"'The CJEU, its legal reasoning, and its interaction with its Advocates-General': CELS Seminar\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allow=\"clipboard-write\" seamless src=\"http://player.captivate.fm/episode/351beb1f-7791-4908-b156-5e489b40c51d\"></iframe>","title":"'The CJEU, its legal reasoning, and its interaction with its Advocates-General': CELS Seminar","description":"Speaker: Eleanor Sharpston KC, Advocate General, CJEU (2006-2020) and Goodhart Professor, University of Cambridge (2023/2024) \r\n\r\nAbstract: The CJEU is a court that speaks through a single judgment, and that \u2018dialogues\u2019 with its Advocates General without ever saying quite what that dialogue means. What is the reader to make of the interplay between the individual opinion of the advocate general and the collective decision of the judges? The final seminar in the series asks some questions, suggests some partial answers, and invites reflection on whether the current arrangements should \u2018evolve\u2019 (and, if so, in what direction).\r\n\r\nThis entry provides an audio-only item for iTunes.\r\n\r\nFor more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/3aeff3d5-bb24-428b-a8a3-48dac7f4e8f1/4465530.jpg"}