{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2F52c07ed7-42db-46dc-8d13-80ab62b7843f","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 200px;\" title=\"Originalism (with Joel Alicea)\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allow=\"clipboard-write\" seamless src=\"http://player.captivate.fm/episode/52c07ed7-42db-46dc-8d13-80ab62b7843f\"></iframe>","title":"Originalism (with Joel Alicea)","description":"<br />\nThe conservative legal movement is in the midst of a great debate about its future. For decades, <a href=\"https://www.aei.org/events/common-law-originalism-2019-walter-berns-annual-constitution-day-lecture-with-james-stoner/\">originalism </a>\u2014 the idea that the original meaning of the Constitution is binding on today&#8217;s interpreters \u2014 has been and remains the movement&#8217;s default theory. But that idea&#8217;s meaning is now in flux as new theories challenge longstanding beliefs about its core philosophical beliefs. In this episode, Devorah and Daniel talk to Joel Alicia about originalism&#8217;s varying interpretations and its future in the conservative legal movement. <br />\n<br />\n<br />\n<br />\n<a href=\"http://www.cooperkirk.com/lawyers/joel-alicea/\">Joel Alicea</a> is an attorney at Cooper &amp; Kirk, PLLC, in Washington, D.C. This episode is inspired by Joel\u2019s essay from the Spring 2015 issue of National Affairs, \u201c<a href=\"https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/originalism-and-the-rule-of-the-dead\">Originalism and the Rule of the Dead</a>.\u201d   <br />","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/772081ae-c222-47c1-96d3-8a24b908d4f5/nationalaffairspodcast-finallogo2-3000px.png"}