{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2F8de5b17d-bed8-454d-aeec-554a0059dc22","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 200px;\" title=\"Quotas and Consequences\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allow=\"clipboard-write\" seamless src=\"http://player.captivate.fm/episode/8de5b17d-bed8-454d-aeec-554a0059dc22\"></iframe>","title":"Quotas and Consequences","description":"\u200bLawPodder \u200bKavina Rajendran and Professor Julie Suk discuss Professor Suk's 2014 paper, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2258733 (Quotas and Consequences: A Transnational Evaluation). The episode explores the US jurisprudence surrounding quotas and the evolving discourse surrounding the consequences of quotas in countries such as Germany and Chile.","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/7ba21ef3-c421-42c5-8bd1-aeaff42ef603/2022-03-03-quotas.jpg"}