{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2Fa02592f4-b2c3-46ec-b7ad-f0cfb4577832","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 200px;\" title=\"The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: CULS Panel event\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allow=\"clipboard-write\" seamless src=\"http://player.captivate.fm/episode/a02592f4-b2c3-46ec-b7ad-f0cfb4577832\"></iframe>","title":"The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: CULS Panel event","description":"This debate on 1 February 2019 focused on an age-old question between some of the biggest voices in constitutional law. Experience a debate between eminent professors, and hear them justify their preferred theories. This debate ties in with constitutional law teaching. \r\n\r\nPanellists: \r\n\r\n- Professor Paul Craig (St. John's College, Oxford), \r\n- Professor Christopher Forsyth (Robinson College, Cambridge) \r\n\r\nModerator \r\n\r\n- Professor Trevor Allan (Pembroke College, Cambridge) \r\n\r\nThis event was kindly sponsored by Clifford Chance. \r\n\r\nFor more information see the CULS website at: https://culs.org.uk\r\n\r\nThis item provides an audio entry for iTunes.","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/91e456b3-25df-467e-acc3-2b6fde343bfa/3053566.jpg"}