{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2Fc29f4e31-7ba6-4b25-8c93-e3911f0cf34d","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 200px;\" title=\"Geoengineering part 1: the case to try modifying the climate\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allow=\"clipboard-write\" seamless src=\"http://player.captivate.fm/episode/c29f4e31-7ba6-4b25-8c93-e3911f0cf34d\"></iframe>","title":"Geoengineering part 1: the case to try modifying the climate","description":"<p>Geoengineering, the modification of the climate using technological interventions to reverse climate change, is a hugely divisive issue and we\u2019ve decided to explore it in two episodes. </p><br><p>In this first episode, we talk to scientists working on potential geoengineering technologies who argue the case for conducting research into these interventions. We speak to <a href=\"https://theconversation.com/profiles/shaun-fitzgerald-98355\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Shaun Fitzgerald</a>, director of the Centre for Climate Repair at the University of Cambridge&nbsp;in the UK and <a href=\"https://theconversation.com/profiles/hugh-hunt-205860\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Hugh Hunt</a>, deputy director at the Centre, as well as <a href=\"https://theconversation.com/profiles/ben-kravitz-1240340\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Ben Kravitz</a>, assistant professor of Earth and atmospheric sciences at Indiana University in the US. We're also joined by Stacy Morford, environment and climate editor at The Conversation in the US.</p><br><p>Part two, out tomorrow, will focus on the case against a particular type of solar geoengineering called solar radiation management. </p><br><p>This episode was written and produced by Katie Flood, Mend Mariwany and Gemma Ware, with sound design by Michelle Macklem. Our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. <a href=\"https://theconversation.com/geoengineering-the-scientists-who-argue-modifying-the-climate-could-buy-the-world-time-podcast-237670\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Full credits for this episode</a> are available. <a href=\"https://theconversation.com/uk/newsletters/the-daily-2\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Sign up here for a free daily newsletter</a> from The Conversation.</p><br><p><strong>Further reading:</strong></p><ul><li><a href=\"https://theconversation.com/what-could-we-do-to-cool-the-arctic-specifically-188626\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">What could we do to cool the Arctic, specifically?</a></li><li><a href=\"https://theconversation.com/climate-engineering-carries-serious-national-security-risks-countries-facing-extreme-heat-may-try-it-anyway-and-the-world-needs-to-be-prepared-222120\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Climate engineering carries serious national security risks \u2212 countries facing extreme heat may try it anyway, and the world needs to be&nbsp;prepared</a></li><li><a href=\"https://theconversation.com/blocking-out-the-sun-wont-fix-climate-change-but-it-could-buy-us-time-50818\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Blocking out the sun won\u2019t fix climate change \u2013 but it could buy us&nbsp;time</a></li><li><a href=\"https://theconversation.com/the-overshoot-myth-you-cant-keep-burning-fossil-fuels-and-expect-scientists-of-the-future-to-get-us-back-to-1-5-c-230814\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">The overshoot myth: you can\u2019t keep burning fossil fuels and expect scientists of the future to get us back to&nbsp;1.5\u00b0C</a></li></ul><h2><br></h2><p><br></p><br /><hr>","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/8bd6b523-fba6-4b27-8e73-ef47819e2a1a/1611166542483-58b6f7d3c94d8860121628183369a447.jpeg"}