{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2Fcbcf2219-e98f-4663-8eb9-8cde5be4e2ed","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"<iframe style=\"width: 100%; height: 200px;\" title=\"RW4 Rejection, tenure and so-called excellence\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" allow=\"clipboard-write\" seamless src=\"http://player.captivate.fm/episode/cbcf2219-e98f-4663-8eb9-8cde5be4e2ed\"></iframe>","title":"RW4 Rejection, tenure and so-called excellence","description":"In this short related-work podcast, I share the stories of two people we\u2019ll call Alex and Blake who are facing the challenge of meeting tenure criteria. From this I reflect on the personal, professional and societal impacts entailed in this push for so-called excellence.  I then discuss two different papers that point in different ways to the need for institutional and cultural level response and present ideas for practical actions \u2013 for how we can address academic rejection and what it means to focus on soundness and capacity instead of excellence. As Moore et al state, excellence is not excellent and in fact is at odds with qualities of good research.","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/56494203-53a3-489e-b96d-3850f4ec0f94/gr-stocks-iq9sajezkoe-unsplash.jpg"}