{"href":"http://player.captivate.fm/services/oembed?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplayer.captivate.fm%2Fepisode%2Fdcb18875-2d6a-4d67-bbab-e138118cdc05","version":"1.0","provider_name":"Captivate.FM","provider_url":"https://www.captivate.fm","width":600,"height":200,"type":"rich","html":"","title":"74 \u2013 Ed Ciarimboli \u2013 Masked Justice: Part 3","description":"In this episode of the Trial Lawyer Nation podcast, Michael sits down with fellow trial lawyer Ed Ciarimboli from Pennsylvania. Ed is part of the elite class of lawyers who have been able to take a case to trial in the COVID era. And with the final witness testimony being so monumental to the case that they settled immediately after he left the witness box, this trial story is one you need to hear to believe!\nThey begin with a brief discussion of Ed\u2019s background and how he started trying cases. A partner at a 12-lawyer and 3 location firm, Fellerman and Ciarimboli, Ed mainly focuses on commercial motor vehicle cases. He got into the AAJ speaking circuit about 9 years ago, where he began to really hone his skills as a lawyer. It was a couple of years after that when he was told he needed to become great at trying cases. When Ed asked why, the other lawyer responded, \u201cBecause you\u2019re the worst lawyer I\u2019ve ever seen at settling a case.\u201d So, Ed took the advice and has since focused his energy on being as comfortable as possible in the courtroom.\nWhen asked to elaborate on what he did to develop his skills as a trial lawyer, Ed insists the biggest factor was his investment in his education. He urges young lawyers to do more than join a webinar- they should go to conferences and workshops to truly focus on the different aspects of trial and HOW they\u2019re doing it. Body language and movement are crucial to a lawyer\u2019s performance in the courtroom, and after working with a long list of consultants and gurus on these topics, Ed encourages everyone who wants to be a great trial lawyer to put the effort into this.\nHe then clarifies that this doesn\u2019t mean following the dogmatic approach of one pro- it\u2019s about learning the fundamentals (taking depositions, cross-examinations, etc.) then studying different approaches to storytelling and choosing the best one for your particular case. This approach requires much more work than a cookie-cutter strategy, but both Ed and Michael agree that it\u2019s well worth the effort.\nMichael then starts to dig into the facts of Ed\u2019s case, which was unique and incredibly tragic. Ed explains how the defendant company purchased a huge molding machine from a broker. The defendant company signed the paperwork and assumed responsibility for the machine, then hired a crane company for the rigging and transportation of said machine. The crane company was told nothing about the details of the machine, notably the 55-gallon drum of hydraulic fluid still inside the machine. In the process of moving the machine onto the flatbed truck for transportation, the hydraulic fluid sloshed to the side and caused the machine to tip over onto Ed\u2019s client, killing him instantly.\nEd then explains how they ended up suing the company who purchased the machine and shares how his extensive work on commercial motor vehicle cases set him up for success on this case. Ed knew the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations \u201c100 million times better than the defense,\u201d which he used to his advantage in placing the blame on the defendant company whose only real defense was, \u201cWe hired this company.\u201d\nMichael continues the conversation by asking Ed how jury selection was handled. Ed shares how voir dire was conducted in a large old theater instead of a courtroom in order to allow for safe spacing between the potential jurors. And while he admits he was more nervous for this jury selection than any he\u2019s ever done before, the process went incredibly smoothly. He gives high praise to the judge, his jury consultants, and the jurors themselves, stating, \u201cI truly believe we won this case in jury selection.\u201d He also notes that the demographic composition of the jury pool was not skewed, something which will surprise listeners who believed COVID would cause people to resist sitting on a jury.\nEd then shares the setup of the courtroom, which included the jurors sitting in the gallery with two large screens in front of...","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":300,"thumbnail_url":"https://artwork.captivate.fm/80de4db6-da18-41b8-9643-156c5d06db25/tln-logo-itunes-1400.jpg"}